MADISON, Wis. — In a case before the Wisconsin Supreme Court that seeks to force physicians to provide substandard care, the American Medical Association (AMA) and Wisconsin Medical Society (WisMed) today filed an amicus brief (PDF) arguing against ivermectin as a court ordered intervention for COVID-19 as the drug has not proven effective against the disease.

The amicus brief in Gahl v. Aurora Health notes that ivermectin is not within the standard of care for the treatment of COVID-19 and warned against the court compelling the use of a drug that medical consensus finds is unsupported by available medical evidence and discouraged by federal agencies and health authorities.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention and the Food & Drug Administration have issued advisories indicating that ivermectin is not authorized or approved for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. While the National Institutes of HealthWorld Health Organization, and Merck—the manufacturer of ivermectin—all state there is insufficient evidence to support the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

The AMA and WisMed stated in the brief:

“The overwhelming majority of studies investigating ivermectin have not found it to be an effective COVID-19 treatment. The few dissenting studies that exist have ‘substantially evaporated under close scrutiny’ and even ivermectin’s manufacturer ‘do[es] not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin for preventing or treating COVID-19. Thus, the consensus view of reasonable medical providers is that, apart from clinical trials, ivermectin should not be administered to treat COVID-19.”

Patients are encouraged to talk to their physicians about therapies authorized or approved for the treatment of COVID-19. These important conversations have been greatly complicated by misinformation about ivermectin and COVID-19. To provide patients with competent treatment, the AMA and WisMed urged the court to acknowledge the standard of care for the treatment of COVID-19 does not require physicians to administer ivermectin.

Spurred by a mission to promote the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health, the AMA continues to work in the courts to support evidence-based measures that reduce the risk of infection, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19 and ensure the health and safety of our nation’s workforces, families, and communities.



Similarly to treatment for Lyme/MSIDS, the Wisconsin State Medical Board and the AMA, which is run by a powerful private, nonprofit mob that exerts its influence through lobbying to censor and punish doctors who don’t toe the official party line in a “medical consensus,” are pushing back against COVID treatments that work.  How do I know ivermectin works?

Ivermectin has beat out NINE other medications – including the golden calf (Paxlovid) of the FDA.

Similarly to Lyme/MSIDS treatments that work, mainstream medicine simply ignores research that doesn’t come from supposed “medical consensus” – outliers need not apply.  This perfectly demonstrates that a Cabal is literally controlling medicine, and you are either in the group or you are not.  If you are in the group and regurgitate the narrative, you are fine.  If you disagree with the”consensus” you are ostracized, censored, bullied, persecuted, and unable to get your work published in journals.  This is reality.

It’s also imperative to understand that the CDC and the FDA are completely corrupt organizations that monopolize medicine.

Anything that competes with their vested interests is brutally attacked.

Our government agencies have vested interests in “vaccines” and own patents on over 50, as well as tests, and treatments.  This conflict of interest means business is more important than public health.  

For more:

I could literally go on to infinity with this…..

%d bloggers like this: