https://thevaccinereaction.org/2023/11/blacklisting-and-censorship-violates-freedom-of-thought-speech-and-conscience-barbara-loe-fisher/  Video Here (Approx. 20 Min)

Blacklisting and Censorship Violates Freedom of Thought, Speech and Conscience

by Barbara Loe Fisher

Nov. 2, 2023

Freedom of thought, speech and conscience are inalienable natural[1] and civil rights recognized in America and in countries where respect for autonomy[2] and protection of bodily integrity [3] [4] [5] places limits on the power of the state. Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Americans have the legal right to peacefully dissent and “petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” [6] The freedom to use our intelligence and follow our conscience [7] [8] [9] is absolute when we make a decision that involves taking a risk of injury or death for ourselves or on behalf of our minor child, [10] and the freedom to speak in the digital public square about what that means should be absolute as well.

This is a commentary about a special report I have researched and written on the systematic abuse of parents with vaccine injured children and the silencing of my voice and information published by the charitable National Vaccine Information Center in the digital public square both before and after the declaration of a coronavirus pandemic in 2020. I have submitted the report to the US House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. [11]

Entitled “The Silencing of Barbara Loe Fisher and the National Vaccine Information Center in the Digital Public Square: A Violation of Freedom of Thought, Speech and Conscience,” the report is anchored with more than 300 live linked references. [12] It  contains information about the collaborative actions taken by government officials, political operatives, corporations, academic and financial institutions, media, philanthropic foundations, and global governmental organizations to target, discredit, discriminate against and censor me and NVIC for our mission since 1982 to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education, and to defend the legal right of Americans to make voluntary decisions about vaccination without being coerced or sanctioned for the decision made.[13]    (Go to link for video & article)

_____________

Go here for Fisher’s report.

For more:

The following information about “FDA approved” tests is a perfect example of corrupt government agencies doing what they do best: monopolize and control disease for their own purposes – usually financial.

They have restricted doctor and patient choice, care, and access in a number of ways, but one way they cling to like a survivor on a raft is testing. Lyme testing has been fraudulent from the get-go and their suppression of other tests is something that should be made into a movie.  In so many ways the CDC and FDA are maniacal evil twins – both doing all within their power to monopolize medicine.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee has sued the CDC for suppressing direct detection tests for Lyme disease, and promoting their own newly patented, unproven metabolomics technology for diagnosis of LD. Current and former CDC representatives receive royalties as a result of working on the approval and promotion/CDC endorsement of a Lyme disease serology test.

Lee has been fighting back with equal tenacity and performed independent research on faulty COVID testing which showed COVID cases will be overstated by a factor of 72%!

Instead of fixing the obvious errors (no positive control sample, no data on false positives, faulty cycle thresholds, and refusal to publish Ct values due to it being “proprietary”,) HHS, FDA, and CDC opted for arbitrary and perpetual diagnosis of COVID.

It’s important the CDC and FDA control testing because then they can completely steer the narrative about any disease – even if the numbers are all based on faulty testing.  They’ve been doing this in Lymeland for over 40 years by

“setting arbitrary level of antibodies to diagnose a disease that has not been amenable to Koch’s postulates seems open to question.  By the same token, ignoring antibody results unless they meet arbitrary levels seems suspect.  The vast majority of patients in this series showed some WB antibody exposure, but many did not meet the arbitrary limits set….in our present state of knowledge, the diagnosis of chronic Lyme disease is a clinical one.  Many of the patients in this series have suffered serious ‘hurts’ when they have been told that they could not have LD because their WB did not meet arbitrary limits.”  ~ Dr. Burton Waisbren  IDSA founder who disagreed with his colleagues.  RIP

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/  Video within link (Approx. 10 Min)

Medscape: New Federal Oversight of Lab Developed Tests

Carl Tuttle

Hudson, NH, United States

NOV 1, 2023 — 

Please see the following inquiry sent to Dr. Paul Auwaerter regarding his commentary (verbal diarrhea) published on Medscape.  He has yet to respond to my serious question. Why not email Dr. Auwaerter and demand a response?

Auwaerter’s image was found on his Hopkins profile page:
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/profiles/details/paul-auwaerter

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “pauwaert@jhmi.edu” <pauwaert@jhmi.edu>, “pgauwaerter@gmail.com” <pgauwaerter@gmail.com>
Cc: “aaguilar@webmd.net” <aaguilar@webmd.net>, “DFlapan@Medscape.net” <DFlapan@Medscape.net>, “lkane@medscape.net” <lkane@medscape.net>, “gamiller@medscape.net” <gamiller@medscape.net>, “dolmos@webmd.net” <dolmos@webmd.net>, “sarah.wright@webmd.net” <sarah.wright@webmd.net>, “editor2@webmd.net” <editor2@webmd.net>
Date: 10/25/2023 9:51 AM EDT
Subject: Medscape: New Federal Oversight of Lab Developed
Tests

Medscape COMMENTARY
 
New Federal Oversight of Lab Developed Tests
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/997365

Paul G. Auwaerter, MD

Excerpt:

“I often see patients who are concerned they might have Lyme disease, or they’ve been told by other physicians that they have a tickborne or multiple infections. I’ve had patients who claim to have five or six infections: Lyme disease, Babesia, Bartonella, Mycoplasma, or Epstein-Barr virus. They bring LDT results from outside laboratories, which often have a proviso that these tests are only for research or educational purposes. Yet, they purport finding analytes (antibodies or proteins) that suggest the patient has an active infection. These patients may have been treated but are not improving, so they are referred to me.”

Oct 25, 2023

The IDSA Foundation
1300 Wilson Boulevard Suite 300
Arlington, VA 22209
Attn:  Paul Auwaerter, vice chair of the IDSA Foundation

Dear Dr. Auwaerter,

As a member of New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu’s 2020-2021 commission to study diagnostic testing for Lyme disease, I read your commentary with great interest. After a full year of deliberation, study results concluded that the FDA approved two-tier serologic immunoassay for Lyme was not reliable in all stages of disease. (No better than a coin toss)

COMMISSION TO STUDY TESTING FOR LYME AND OTHER TICK-BORNE DISEASES
https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/statstudcomm/committees/default.aspx?id=1515

“A commission to study the role of clinical diagnosis and the limitations of serological diagnostic tests in determining the presence or absence of Lyme and other tick-borne diseases”
 
With that conclusion, serology cannot be used to determine who has or does not have Lyme disease.

“FDA approval” (Federal Oversight) has failed miserably in this example.

The CDC has warned the medical community that “surveillance case definitions” (which include the IgM and IgG Western blot serologic bands) are not to be used for making a clinical diagnosis:

From the CDC website:

Lyme Disease (Borrelia burgdorferi)
2022 Case Definition
https://ndc.services.cdc.gov/case-definitions/lyme-disease-2022/

NOTE: A surveillance case definition is a set of uniform criteria used to define a disease for public health surveillance. Surveillance case definitions enable public health officials to classify and count cases consistently across reporting jurisdictions. Surveillance case definitions are not intended to be used by healthcare providers for making a clinical diagnosis or determining how to meet an individual patient’s health needs.
________________________

Recent announcements:

1. “Standard” Lyme testing once again proves fatal
https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-testing-proves-fatal/

“Lyme disease helped kill our son. A better test might have saved him.”

2. Sensitivity of Two-Tiered Lyme Disease Serology in Children with an Erythema Migrans Lesion 
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piad073

Abstract

In our prospective cohort of 192 children with a physician-diagnosed erythema migrans (EM) lesion, two-tier Lyme disease serology had higher sensitivity in children with multiple EM lesions (76.8% multiple lesions vs. 38.1% single EM; difference 38.7%, 95% CI 24.8 to 50.4%). The diagnosis of cutaneous Lyme disease should be based on careful physical examination rather than laboratory testing.

3. Jury awards $6.5M to Maine family for wrongful death, negligent misdiagnosis
https://fox23maine.com/news/local/jury-awards-65m-to-maine-family-for-wrongful-death-negligent-misdiagnosis-mercy-hospital-dr-john-henson-peter-smith-lyme-disease-lyme-carditis-physicians

Court records show Dr. Henson diagnosed smith with a skin disorder and a virus, writing “no sign of Lyme Disease.” Smith died of Lyme carditis.

(I understand that serology was NEGATIVE in this case)

Question:

Dr. Auwaerter…  I would like to call attention to the following 2009 tick study conducted here in New Hampshire:

Correlation between Tick Density and Pathogen Endemicity, New Hampshire
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671416/

The study found deer ticks were carrying multiple pathogens (co-infections) that could be transmitted in a single bite.

What FDA approved Tick-Borne Disease Panel are you recommending so as not to miss any of these infections?

A response to this inquiry is requested
Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Cc: MEDSCAPE EDITORIAL STAFF

Additional reference:

“Seronegativity in Lyme borreliosis and Other Spirochetal Infections” 16 September 2003
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3d6m45jzlhhwalu/Seronegativity.pdf?dl=0

“If false results are to be feared, it is the false negative result which holds the greatest peril for the patient.”

https://www.globallymealliance.org/blog/chronic-lyme-is-getting-more-validation?

This is evident in the updated wording on the CDC website, which says, “The state of the science related to the persistent symptoms associated with Lyme disease is limited, emerging, and unsettled. Additional research is needed to better understand how to treat, manage, and support people with persistent symptoms associated with Lyme disease.” While the CDC isn’t using the term chronic Lyme, they are validating the experience as well as the need for better research to understand it. Again, the needle is moving in the right direction.

With Lyme treatment and recovery, everything happens in baby steps (sometimes forward and sometimes backwards). We want to get immediately better, but when you’ve been sick for a long time, there isn’t a quick fix. We appreciate little progress as we work towards a larger goal of wellness. When it comes to validation of chronic Lyme disease, I similarly appreciate the progress that is being made, knowing there is still distance to be covered. I believe we Lyme warriors have reason to hope.

***

Writer
By Jennifer Crystal

https://www.globallymealliance.org/news/the-long-shadow-of-lyme-infection-cdc-update-sparks-new-conversation

Chronic and Persistent Lyme Symptoms: CDC Update Underscores Progress

The CDC’s update on Lyme infections is a shift in tone on the long-lasting symptoms and challenges faced by individuals. As acceptance of ‘long COVID’ and the concept of persistent illnesses grows in familiarity, the CDC’s update on Lyme disease is no exception.

In the evolving landscape of post-infection ailments, the CDC’s recent update delves into persistent symptoms following Lyme infections. This exploration underscores a crucial reality: infections can cast a long shadow, leaving individuals with enduring symptoms that debunk conventional CDC timelines, persisting for weeks, months, or even longer, despite what is deemed ‘appropriate’ treatment.

The CDC’s goes on to list disease agents or co-infections associated with chronic symptoms, including Borrelia burgdorferi, Campylobacter, Chikungunya virus, Coxiella burnetii, Dengue virus, Ebola virus, Epstein Barr virus, Enterovirus, Poliovirus, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), and West Nile virus. What’s striking is the challenge faced by many: identifying the specific infection triggering these persistent symptoms. For some, the initial infection might have gone unnoticed, leading to a diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

This update holds broader significance. For years, the medical community, including the CDC, resisted acknowledging the chronic nature of Lyme disease. Even after distancing itself from the IDSA Lyme treatment guidelines, which denied the existence of chronic Lyme, the CDC remained cautious in recognizing persistent Lyme symptoms. However, the arrival of COVID-19 shifted the paradigm dramatically.

The pandemic brought forth a wave of ‘long COVID’ cases, characterized by symptoms like debilitating fatigue and cognitive fog—symptoms strikingly similar to those endured by individuals with persistent Lyme disease, ME/CFS, and other chronic conditions. A 2022 CDC survey revealed the staggering scale of long COVID’s impact: nearly 18 million Americans wrestled with it since the pandemic began, with almost 9 million still affected at the time of the survey.

Perhaps ‘long COVID’ forced the hand of the CDC to shift its language around Lyme disease.  Nevertheless, this is not an admission of chronic Lyme, but it is an acknowledgement of chronic illness and symptoms that interplay with a Lyme diagnosis. This update underscores progress, acknowledging the enduring impact of infections. Yet, it serves as a stark reminder of the long road ahead in the fight for recognition and understanding of chronic Lyme disease. While the CDC’s step towards recognizing persistent symptoms is notable, the battle for acknowledging and addressing chronic Lyme disease at the CDC is far from over.

To see the updated webpage on the CDC’s website, click here

_____________

**Comment**

I do not share the same optimism as the authors of these articles, and I write about my reasons in the comment section of this article.

In short, the CDC is such an abject, conflict riddled organization that abandoned science so long ago, it should be completely disbanded.  Any statements it makes should not only be taken with a grain of salt – you should do the exact opposite.

If their brazen, continued illegal handling of COVID didn’t prove this, nothing will.

This institutionally biased agency has manipulated, ignored, and hidden data for its own purposes, insists upon using its own faulty tests, cherry picks and destroys inconvenient data, owns patents on virtually every aspect of disease, and actually purchased, monitored, and used your cell phone data.  Source

For some reason people still want to believe in this evil agency when it has done nothing to help patients.  And when I say nothing, I mean nothing. In fact, it has been the direct cause of patient suffering for over 40 years.  Did you know it began in 1798 as the Marine Hospital Service (MHS) which then morphed into the Public Health Service (PHS) in 1902 that sprayed for mosquitoes with DDT during WWII.  What started as 400 employees mushroomed to 15-16 thousand.  Did you know that it was behind the Tuskagee Experiment before changing its name to the Communicable Disease Center (CDC) which then became the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)?  The agency’s initial focus was on tropical and subtropical diseases.

Did you know it is not a true government agency due to vast amounts of private funding it funnels through the CDC Foundation?
No matter how many times this agency changes its name, it remains the same evil, corrupt agency.

I also question the entire premise of “Long-COVID.”  Until the “vaccinated” are separated from the unvaccinated – nobody will ever get a true picture of anything.  “Long-COVID” could very well be a bait and switch to distract from all the adverse reactions from the gene therapy injections that are riddled with so many problems it’s hard to keep up with them all.  ‘The powers that be’ definitely need a scape-goat and “Long-COVID” fits the bill perfectly.

I’m so done with the CDC and you should be too.  

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/concerns-over-cumulative-cardiotoxicity?

Concerns over Cumulative Cardiotoxicity with mRNA Injection

Troponin Measurements Before and After 4th Shot Give Clues

The field of pharmacovigilance and drug safety is loaded with regulatory structure and milestones. One of the exercises a new drug must go through is “cumulative toxicity” testing. If a drug is harmful, one dose may not be enough to bring out a side effect. However after 5 or more does, many times problems will emerge. It is usual and customary to count all adverse events for 30 days after a drug is stopped because it may have accumulated in the body or have induced lingering effects.

We have learned COVID-19 vaccines are very long lasting in the body, and since the start of the worldwide mass vaccination campaign, our public health agency sponsors have never mentioned cumulative toxicity as a concern.

Levi et al published an analysis in the European Journal of Heart Failure that appeared to make the COVID-19 vaccines look “safe.” But on the surface there are problems. 324 healthcare workers had cardiac troponin (test for cardiac damage) blood testing before and after the 4th injection. The authors focus on one unfortunate soul who had chest pain, a pathologic rise in troponin, and had to undergo more blood testing, ECG’s, echocardiography, and cardiac MRI. One out of 324 is far to many to have this problem with a routine vaccination!

What authors may have revealed in the cohort is cumulative cardiotoxicity. These patients were ~147 days after the last shot. Among healthy persons, we should be concerned over troponin elevated BEFORE the fourth shot.  (See link for article)

______________

Important points:

  • as many as 14.81% cumulatively sustained damage from shots 3 and 4
  • all small prospective cohort studies have found one or more cases indicating cardiac damage: MansanguanBeurgin, and now Levi
  • 75% of people in the U.S. took one or more shots

______________

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/nearly-1-in-3-covid-19-vaccine-recipients-suffered-neurological-side-effects-study

Nearly 1 in 3 COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Suffered Neurological Side Effects: Study

The people included in the study suffered from headaches, tremors, muscle spasms, insomnia, sleepiness, vertigo, and difficulty in concentration.

10/30/2023

Almost a third of individuals who received a COVID-19 vaccine suffered from neurological complications including tremors, insomnia, and muscle spasms, according to a recent study published in the journal Vaccines.

The study analyzed 19,096 people who received COVID-19 vaccines in Italy in July 2021, out of which 15,368 had taken the Pfizer vaccine, 2,077 had taken the Moderna version, and 1,651 took the AstraZeneca version.

While both Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vaccines, AstraZeneca, being an adenovirus vaccine, uses a different mechanism to trigger the immune response.

The study found that about 31.2 percent of vaccinated individuals developed post-vaccination neurological complications, particularly among those injected with the AstraZeneca jab. Different vaccines had a different “neurological risk profile.”  (See link for article)

_______________

Important points:

  • females faced an “increased risk of developing neurological complications”
  • a primary female sex steroid called estradiol triggers a specific immunity process to produce “antibodies against infections.”
  • Caution should be used when administering COVID-19 vaccines to vulnerable people, such as to those who suffer from allergies,” the study stated. “We strongly believe that our findings are relevant for public health regarding the safety of vaccines in a large cohort.”
If you are a Lyme/MSIDS patient YOU ARE VULNERABLE.

______________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-vaccine-dna-pregnant-mother-fetus/?

DNA Contamination in Pfizer Shots Could Transfer From Pregnant Mom to Fetus, Experts Suggest

According to a panel of experts, led by Steve Kirsch, regulators are ignoring proof that Pfizer intentionally concealed the presence of contaminants in its COVID-19 vaccines. Those contaminants could threaten unborn babies whose mothers receive the vaccine, the experts said in a recent video.

https://www.vaccineawarenessweek.org/?wix-vod-video

Vaccine Awareness Week

Oct. 29-Nov. 4

In the top link you will learn the story of Barbara Loe Fisher’s (and other’s) journey to safeguard vaccine safety and champion informed consent.  In short, her bright, healthy two and a half year old son suffered a reaction to his fourth DPT shot.  Instead of accepting what happened to her son she joined with other parents of DPT injured children and then co-authored a book on pertussis and the pertussis vaccine that was the first major critique of the U.S. mass vaccination system.  Forty one years ago she began the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) to help parents obtain referenced information on vaccine history, science, policy, law and ethics to facilitate educated vaccine decision making and encourage active citizen participation in the public policymaking and legislative process

She has been a voice of reason and compassion in the vaccine safety debate, defining and defending the human right to informed consent to vaccination.

NVIC has operated a Vaccine Reaction Registry since 1982 and provides a public forum for reporting of vaccine reactions and failures on The International Memorial for Vaccine Victims and the Vaccine Failure Wall. On the Cry for Vaccine Freedom Wall, NVIC provides a public forum for describing first person experiences of harassment and sanctions by physicians, government officials and employers when Americans attempt to exercise voluntary informed consent to vaccination.

  • NVIC also maintains an up-to-date list with links to vaccine laws, requirements and exemptions, for all 50 states.
  • It also publishes two free digital periodicals – the monthly NVIC Newsletter and weekly journal newspaper, The Vaccine Reaction emailed to more than 65,000 subscribers.
  • NVIC’s publication program also features vaccine information guides, brochures, posters, and in-depth special reports downloadable from the Ask 8 Information Kiosk and many may be ordered in print form by contacting us.
  • NVIC operates a free online advocacy communications network, the NVIC Advocacy Portal, to educate and empower citizens at the grassroots level in every state to secure and defend informed consent protections in U.S. vaccine policies and laws.
  • Every day, NVIC serves many new followers on TwitterMeWeGabMindsTelegram, and Rumble.
  • NVIC produces vaccine education video briefs and longer written referenced video commentaries. NVIC provides downloadable podcasts of longer commentaries on Sound Cloud, iTunes and through NVIC.org.
  • Check out the NVIC website for much, much more.

Over the past 40 years, Barbara has seen a disturbing shift in public conversations about vaccination, health and autonomy, especially since the declaration of a coronavirus pandemic in 2020. Parents of vaccine injured children and anyone defending the legal right to make voluntary vaccine decisions are being demonized, persecuted, sanctioned and censored in the digital public square. Her voice and the information that NVIC researches and publishes online has been scrubbed from social media platforms and is being stifled by Internet search engines. While NVIC has faced persecution for 15 years, go here and read an important article on how there’s been a new concerted effort to control information about vaccines and countering vaccine hesitancy.  The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is itself a hate group and has discredited and demonized anyone who questions vaccines. It has been publicly called out for blatantly lying to create false narrative.

Memes, Magnets and Microchips: Narrative Dynamics Around COVID-19 Vaccines,’ by the Virality Project, put out by the Stanford International Observatory, the NYU Center for Social Media Politics, the University of Washington Center for an Informed Public and Graphika found weaponization against its citizens by the government as the federal government, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of State, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Defense and more, joined with businesses and institutions in society, particularly universities, to create what is known as ‘the censorship industrial complex,’ or ‘the disinformation industrial complex.’

Fisher will present a report to the U.S. House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, CISA, and Big Tech against Americans.  She urges everyone to share this report with friends and family.  She also states the NVIC has been ghosted and would appreciate donations.

14th Annual Vaccine Awareness Week

October 29 – November 4, 2023

Sunday, Oct. 29

A video interview with Dr. Joe Mercola and NVIC co-founder and president Barbara Loe Fisher will kick off VAW week

Wednesday, Nov. 1

A special report about the silencing of NVIC’s voice in the digital public square will be published and accompanied by Barbara’s video commentary.

Thursday, Nov. 2

NVIC’s 2023 Annual State Vaccine Legislation Report will be published.

Friday, Nov. 3

The featured film Plandemic 2 will be shown on the Mercola.com website.

Dr. Mercola is generously matching the first $100,000 in donations to NVIC during this event. Your Donation Can Make Twice the Difference

Your donation is making a real difference! Thanks to your support for NVIC’s work, we can:

1. ADVOCATE to make vaccine safety and the legal right to exercise voluntary, informed consent to vaccination a national priority.

2.  DEFEND freedom of thought, speech and conscience and other civil liberties in America. 

3.  CALL for more and better quality science to anchor public health policies and laws 

4.  RESEARCH AND PUBLISH well referenced information on vaccine science, policy, law and ethics to empower individuals to make educated decisions about vaccination and health.

5.  ORGANIZE grassroots support for securing strong informed consent protections in state and federal government vaccine policies and laws. 

Every contribution brings us one step closer to living in a world where everyone can make informed vaccination decisions voluntarily without fear of being coerced or punished by anyone for the decision made. Together, we’re creating a brighter and healthier future. Thank you for being a part of this vital mission.

Since 2010, NVIC and Mercola.com have co-sponsored Vaccine Awareness Week to prioritize vaccine safety and informed consent in the U.S. Join us in spreading vital information on vaccines and informed consent during this critical time in our nation’s history.

Committed to transparency and accountability

NVIC has a small staff of part time employees and volunteers who operate the organization on a day-to-day basis. NVIC has an independent audit conducted every year and is a highly rated non-profit charity committed to transparency and accountability. More information about NVIC can be obtained on GuideStar.

For more: