Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Science Journals Engaged in Massive Disinformation Campaign

**UPDATE Sept. 2022**

This important article shows how medical journals and 86% of clinical trials are funded by Big Pharma, which means journal articles are nothing more than marketing machines.

https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/science-journals-disinformation-campaign

Science journals engaged in massive disinformation campaign

July 13, 2021

These highly regarded scientific journals got caught censoring important facts and stifling scientific debate, deriding anything that didn’t protect their Chinese interests

by Dr. Joseph Mercola

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • The Lancet and Nature have both promoted the natural origin theory for SARS-CoV-2, and protected the theory by refusing to publish counter arguments and/or publishing scientific statements by individuals with serious conflicts of interest
  • The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission included Peter Daszak, Ph.D., president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit organization that collaborated with various universities and organizations on research in China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). He was recently taken off the Commission due to controversy over his large number of conflicts of interest
  • The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission also includes Danielle Anderson, an Australian WIV virologist who left Wuhan shortly before the pandemic broke out. Anderson says she “does not believe” the virus is manmade. Anderson’s Commission biography does not mention that she worked at the WIV
  • In January 2021, 14 global experts submitted a letter to The Lancet in which they argued that “the natural origin is not supported by conclusive arguments and that a lab origin cannot be formally discarded.” The submission was rejected with the justification that the topic was “not a priority” for the journal
  • Richard Horton, the editor-in-chief of The Lancet is now being criticized for his long defense and support of the Chinese regime, and is accused of using The Lancet to pursue political causes and stifle scientific debate

More than a year ago, in February 2020, a group of 27 scientists wrote a letter published in The Lancet condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”1

Although The Lancet — like other medical journals — requires contributors to disclose financial or personal interests that might be viewed as possible conflicts of interests with their submissions, the 27 authors declared they had “no competing interests.”

June 21, 2021, The Lancet published an addendum admitting that “some readers have questioned the validity of this disclosure, particularly as it relates to one of the authors, Peter Daszak.”2

As a result, The Lancet asked the 27 signers to “re-evaluate” their competing interests and to declare any “financial and nonfinancial relationships that may be relevant to interpreting the content of their manuscript.” So far, Daszak has updated his previous claim of having no competing interests to include a 416-word disclosure statement clarifying that, indeed, he had several conflicts of interest.

First, he is the president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit organization that receives funding from a “range of U.S. Government funding agencies and non-governmental sources.”

Second — and most importantly — Daszak also explained that, although its work with China is currently unfunded, he and the Alliance have collaborated with various universities and organizations on research in China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Specifically, this work includes studies of bats and viruses, including “the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines.”

The Lancet Accused of Kowtowing to China

The COVID pandemic has brought attention to any number of problems within the academic arena. Disturbingly, we’ve discovered that scientific journals held in high regard for many decades — The Lancet has been around for 198 years — are colluding to censor important facts and stifle scientific debate. The Lancet statement deriding the lab leak theory as a conspiracy theory to be ignored is a prime example. As reported by the Daily Mail, June 26, 2021:3

“The Lancet letter, signed by 27 experts, played a key part in silencing scientific, political and media discussion of any idea that this pandemic might have begun with a lab incident rather than spilling over naturally from animals.

It was even reportedly used by Facebook to flag articles exploring the lab leak hypothesis as ‘false information’ … Yet it emerged later that The Lancet statement was covertly drafted by British scientist Peter Daszak — a long-term collaborator with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was carrying out high-risk research on bat coronaviruses and had known safety issues …

Four months later, The Lancet set up a ‘Covid-19 Commission’ to assist governments and scrutinize the origins. It was led by Jeffrey Sachs … Incredibly, he backed Daszak to lead his commission’s 12-person taskforce investigating Covid’s origins — joined by five fellow signatories to The Lancet statement …

Last week The Lancet finally ‘recused’ him from its commission and published an ‘addendum’ to its statement detailing some of his Chinese links. Yet critics say the journal has still failed to admit that six more signatories to that February statement have ties to Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance as directors or partners.

‘It would have been better for The Lancet to have stated that Daszak’s and other signers’ previous declarations were untruthful and to have attached an editorial expression of concern,’ said Richard Ebright, a bio-security expert and professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University in New Jersey.

Now The Mail on Sunday has learned that The Lancet is set to publish a second statement by these signatories that presses the case that Covid probably emerged through natural ‘zoonotic’ transmission from animals to humans.”

Richard Horton, the editor-in-chief of The Lancet is now being criticized for his long defense and support of the Chinese regime, and is accused of using The Lancet to pursue political causes and stifle scientific debate.4

In January 2021, 14 global experts submitted a letter to The Lancet in which they argued that “the natural origin is not supported by conclusive arguments and that a lab origin cannot be formally discarded.” Horton rejected the submission, stating it was “not a priority” for the journal.5

“The Lancet also published an entirely made up study claiming hydroxychloroquine was dangerous. This fraudulent paper made the media rounds and led to countries banning the drug’s use against COVID-19.”

Any medical journal worthy of a good reputation needs to be an open platform for wide-ranging debate. Horton’s refusal to publish the other side of the origins argument has without a doubt damaged the credibility and reputation of the journal. Tory MP Bob Seely told the Daily Mail:6

“The claims of a cover-up over the most important scientific issue of our time grow stronger by the day. It is vital we get to the truth over what appears to have been a cover-up on the pandemic origins with the collusion of journals such as The Lancet.”

Let’s also remember that The Lancet published an entirely fake study claiming hydroxychloroquine was dangerous. This paper using completely fabricated data made the media rounds and led to countries banning the drug’s use against COVID-19.

This too raises serious questions about the journal’s credibility. How was this fraud not discovered during the peer review process? Could it be that The Lancet allowed it because it would help protect the roll-out of profitable new COVID drugs and “vaccines”?

What’s Behind Science Journals’ Censorship?

What could possibly be behind science journals’ decision to silence debate in what appears to be a concerted effort to protect Chinese interests? In a June 18, 2021, article,7 Matt Ridley suggests it might have to do with the fact that “scientific papers have become increasingly dependent on the fees that Chinese scientists pay to publish in them, plus advertisements from Chinese firms and subscriptions from Chinese institutions.”

The Lancet is not alone in its less than objective stance on China. In 2017, the Nature journal admitted it censors articles containing words like “Taiwan,” “Tibet” and “cultural revolution” in its Chinese editions at the request of the Chinese government.8 “In April 2020 Nature ran an editorial apologizing for its ‘error’ in ‘associating the virus with Wuhan’ in its news coverage,” Ridley writes.9

Nature also attached an editorial note to several old articles, saying they were being misused “as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered,” and that “there is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.”

One of those articles, published in 2015, was titled “Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research.” The research being questioned was done by WIV researchers.

Gaslighting Alert: Abusers Now Play the Victim Card

For the past year and a half, scientists, doctors, reporters and anyone else who dared point out blatant discrepancies in the natural origins narrative have been attacked and painted as quacks and dangerous conspiracy theorists. They’ve been censored, deplatformed and publicly defamed and shamed. Many a fine career has been ruined or seriously tarnished by baseless personal attacks.

Now that undeniable evidence is finally reaching critical mass, natural origin defenders are playing the victim card. For example, Amy Maxmen, Ph.D., a journalist for Nature for the past 13 years, has been covering the SARS-CoV-2 origin debate. In a May 26, 2021, tweet, she stated the “debate over a lab-leak has become toxic and risky.”10

Angela Rasmussen, Ph.D., a natural origin proponent, responded saying that “the origins debate has become a toxic milieu dominated by opportunists, dilettantes, racist/misogynist assholes, and trolls.”11 Rasmussen claims she’s been personally attacked and abused for trying to explain the natural origin theory.

The irony is that the same people who abused others for talking about the lab leak theory are now getting a taste of their own medicine, and they don’t like it. They’re the ones who have been peddling misinformation all along, and as the masses are catching on to the deceit, they’re catching heat.

To deflect and finger-point yet again, abusers are now playing the victim. Another tactic is to claim that attacks on them are attacks on science itself. Dr. Anthony Fauci, for example, has stated this on more than one occasion already.12 13 In a June 2021 MSNBC interview, Fauci said criticizing him was “very dangerous,” and that: 14 15

“A lot of what you’re seeing as attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science because all of the things I have spoken about from the very beginning have been fundamentally based on science … If you are trying to get at me as a public health official and scientist, you’re really attacking not only Dr. Anthony Fauci, you are attacking science.”

His comments didn’t go over well, based on social media responses.16 Reporter Glenn Greenwald’s Tweet will suffice to summarize the general consensus:17

“Beyond the dangerous arrogance and pomposity of proclaiming ‘anyone who criticizes me is attacking Science’ — thus placing himself off-limits from questioning — he *admitted* he purposely issued false, anti-science, politicized claims … Once you *admit* that you made false statements in violation of The Science™, you don’t then get to equate yourself to The Science™ such that attacks on you are attacks on it.”

Another example is that of Dr. Peter Hotez, one of the most shockingly hateful people in the medical field who has publicly stated he wants to “snuff out” vaccine skeptics and has called for cyberwarfare measures to be deployed against me and others who share vaccine safety information. Coincidentally, this public plea was published in the journal Nature.18

This man, who has spewed all sorts of vile language at parents of vaccine-injured children and called for physical harm and imprisonment of people who don’t agree with the one-size-fits-all vaccine agenda is now complaining about getting bombarded with “anti-vaxx hate speech.”19

Billions of Dollars at Stake

To circle back to the question of why prominent and previously respected science journals are publishing propaganda and suppressing open discussion, the most likely reason — aside from their dependence on Chinese publishing fees and advertising dollars — is the fact that if SARS-CoV-2 is proven to be a manmade virus that escaped from a lab (regardless of its location), billions of dollars in funding for gain-of-function research and even vaccine research could evaporate.

As a publisher of research, it makes sense that journals would be willing to protect the research industry as a whole, and provide a platform for chosen spokespeople — such as Hotez — who shamelessly promote the official narrative, no matter how tenuous or unscientific it might be, or how clear the conflicts of interest.

Here’s another case in point: June 28, 2021, Bloomberg tweeted out a short video featuring Danielle Anderson, an Australian WIV virologist who left Wuhan shortly before the pandemic broke out. Anderson says she “does not believe” the virus is manmade. In response, Hotez tweeted:20

“And we’re in agreement: SARS-2 coronavirus has natural origins, was not produced through GOF [gain-of-function] research, and probably has nothing to do with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Coincidentally, Anderson is also on The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission,21 the same Commission that Daszak was on. Her Lancet Commission bio22 says nothing about her work at the WIV, only that she is a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne, Australia. Why is that? Is Anderson’s link to the WIV yet another “random coincidence” that has no bearing on her message? Or is it part of a pattern?

I believe the engineering of viruses and other pathogens is one of the greatest threats to life on earth at this point. We lucked out with SARS-CoV-2, as it turned out to be far less lethal than initially predicted. The next time we might not be so lucky.

As reported in July 2020, China has plans to erect high-security biolabs in all of its 23 provinces, despite concerns about leakage risks.23 Worldwide, there are hundreds of laboratories where this kind of research is taking place on a daily basis. Considering the history of lab leaks, it’s only a matter of time before something truly nasty gets out.

This is why we must get to the bottom of where SARS-CoV-2 came from. We must know if it was manmade because, if so, we need to ban gain-of-function research aimed at making pathogens more dangerous to humans.

Yes, there are harmless gain-of-function experiments, and that’s not what we’re talking about here, although, harmless experiments can, of course, be steps in a process that ultimately results in a dangerous bioweapon. Overall, I think we need to seriously reconsider the need and value of genetic manipulation of viruses and the creation of synthetic ones.

reprinted with permission

Sources:

____________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

CDC Stops Counting ‘Non Severe’ “Vaccinated” COVID Cases Back in May. Lowers PCR for “Vaccinated” in April – Nothing to See Here

https://www.businessinsider.com/risk-of-delta-variant-cdc-stopped-tracking-cases-vaccinated-2021-7

The CDC stopped tracking most COVID-19 cases in vaccinated people. That makes it hard to know how dangerous Delta really is.

Aria Bendix Jul 3, 2021
coronavirus testing
A nurse administers a COVID-19 test at a testing site in Suffolk County, New York, on December 18, 2020.   John Paraskevas/Newsday via Getty ImagesImportant excerpts from article below:
  • The CDC stopped monitoring non-severe COVID-19 cases among vaccinated people in May.
  • It’s hard to assess Delta’s risk without knowing what mild breakthrough cases look like — or whether they’re becoming more common.

Since May 1, the agency has only reported and investigated coronavirus infections among vaccinated people that resulted in hospitalization or death.

In a recent blog post for Harvard Health Publishing, Robert Shmerling, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, called the CDC’s decision not to track all breakthrough cases “surprising” and “disappointing.”

The coronavirus is going to stick around forever. Get ready for the new normal.  (See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

While the article is riddled with inaccuracies, the take-away here is the CDC has STOPPED counting the majority of cases in “vaccinated” people.  I reported on this fact earlier but it bares mentioning again as this decision is muddying all data being used, which is supplying the rhetoric and tyrannical action.  There is no way to know the impact of anything at this point, with data purposely twisted for a predetermined outcome.

BTW: it was done numerous times before:

But the fun doesn’t end here.

In April, the CDC issued new guidance to laboratories recommending reducing the RT-PCR CT value to 28 cycles, but only for those fully “vaccinated” individuals being tested for COVID.

In other words, lowering the CT threshold parameter will lead to missing infectious persons, and will give the illusion that “vaccinated” people aren’t contracting COVID.

The first question you must ask is, why would the CDC do such a thing?  When you understand their MO; the long and sordid history of corruption, conflicts of interest, and rigging variables for their own nefarious purposes – you can quickly surmise why.  They don’t want people to know the full story, because the full story would reveal that these “break-through” cases (getting COVID after being fully immunized) are far more prolific than the CDC wants to admit to – proving the injections are unnecessary and ineffective.

“Breakthrough” cases can also be deadly, with one study showing 6% end in death. As of June 28, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports 4,686 breakthrough cases resulting in death and hospitalization.

But these deaths and maimed bodies don’t matter, because it’s all for the greater good.

For some historical perspective, watch how “60 Minutes”covered the 1976 swine flu mass vaccination program which was halted after 4,000 reported adverse events.  In contrast, there are 463,457 adverse events reported after the COVID injections from December 2020 to July, 2021, and less than 1% are typically recorded.

For anyone reading this website, you already understand that the CDC owns the patents on not only the very pathogens, but on the testing which it rigs for its own pre-determined outcome. They’ve been doing this with Lyme/MSIDS for over 40 years and continue to get away with arbitrary testing cut-offs, which keeps thousands from diagnosis and treatment.  They are quite experienced at twisting data.

The inconvenient truths that the injections aren’t effective, safe, or needed isn’t good for Big Pharma, Big Tech, mainstream media, FDA, CDC, NIH, or our government – all of which stand to gain from these lucrative gene-therapy injections that aren’t vaccines.

Important quote:

“By tracking only cases requiring hospitalization or causing death, we may miss the chance to learn how people with ‘milder’ disease are affected by Delta or other variant infections, such as how long their symptoms last and how the infection may disrupt their lives.” Robert Shmerling, associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School

But, that is exactly the point.

Now only severe cases will be recorded, to downplay the fact the injections don’t stop infection or death.

Further, they are paying students to persuade people to get the jab and attempting to divide us by blaming the unvaccinated for the pandemic, particularly those who vote conservatively, even though numerous polls and studies have proven this tenant is inaccurate.

Meanwhile, these same corrupt ‘authorities’ are censoring and bad-mouthing cheap, effective treatments that work, so a misinformed public continues to believe their only recourse is to get the dangerous but lucrative COVID shots, our own government developed.

They are also hiding the number of fully “vaccinated” White House staffers who have contracted COVID.
Contracting COVID after being “vaccinated” is an inconvenient truth for the powers that be that must be denied at all costs.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

CDC Quietly Withdraws EUA for COVID PCR Test – It Can’t Distinguish Between COVID & the Flu

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-to-withdraw-emergency-use-authorization-for-rt-pcr-test-because-it-cannot-distinguish-between-sars-cov-2-and-the-flu/

CDC to Withdraw Emergency Use Authorization for RT PCR Test Because It Cannot Distinguish Between SARS-CoV-2 and the Flu

by Brian Shilhavy, July 25, 2021
Editor, Health Impact News

The CDC quietly announced last week that it was withdrawing its request to the FDA for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Most of the public is probably unaware that similar to the current COVID-19 injections that are not yet approved by the FDA, but only given Emergency Use Authorization, so too the hundreds of diagnostic tests that supposedly detect COVID-19 are also NOT approved by the FDA, but only authorized via an EUA.

What is the reason the CDC is withdrawing its EUA request for the Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel?

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test.

CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. (Source.)

Caitlin McFall, writing for Fox News, is the only one in the corporate media I could find that even reported this, and the few reports I found in the Alternative media so far have been mostly inaccurate.

McFall reports:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged labs this week to stock clinics with kits that can test for both the coronavirus and the flu as the “influenza season” draws near.

The CDC said Wednesday it will withdrawal its request for the “Emergency Use Authorization” of real-time diagnostic testing kits, which were used starting in February 2020 to detect signs of the coronavirus, by the end of the year.

“CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives,” the agency said.

The U.S. has reported more than 34.4 million cases of the coronavirus since the pandemic began in 2020 and more than 610,000 deaths.

But while cases of COVID-19 soared nationwide, hospitalizations and deaths caused by influenza dropped.

According to data released by the CDC earlier this month, influenza mortality rates were significantly lower throughout 2020 than previous years.

There were 646 deaths relating to the flu among adults reported in 2020, whereas in 2019 the CDC estimated that between 24,000 and 62,000 people died from influenza-related illnesses.

The CDC urged laboratories to “save both time and resources” by introducing kits that can determine and distinguish a positive test for the coronavirus and flu. (Source.)

So there you have it.

The CDC just basically admitted that many of the COVID-19 cases this past year could not be distinguished from “flu cases.” No wonder flu cases decreased to zero in so many places. See:
Health Officials Admit that Only Those Vaccinated for the Flu are Getting the Flu This Year

The ending of the EUA for the Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel will not happen until the end of the year, December 31, 2021, and the CDC recommends that laboratories start transitioning to other types of COVID-19 diagnostic tests that have been given an EUA by the FDA here.

At the time of publication of this article, the FDA has issued 251 EUAs for COVID-19 diagnostic tests since April 1, 2020. The vast majority of them are for the RT-PCR tests, including about 20 that were just issued EUAs since the beginning of this month, July, 2021.

The cash cow for these tests and the hundreds of companies that got rich selling them will now have to move on to the next phase to be able to cash in.

Diagnostic Testing Fraud: Controlling the Masses and Medical Kidnapping

We have been covering the corruption in the medical diagnostic testing field for the better part of a decade now, and we exposed it early on in the COVID-19 Plandemic last year as well.

Here are some of our previous articles from last year exposing the fraud of COVID-19 diagnostic testing.

When we started MedicalKidnap.com back in 2014, we learned that fraudulent diagnostic testing was a common way for doctors and hospitals to order children be removed from their homes.

Often they create false drug test positive results to remove children from their parents.

Alabama Lab Owner Arrested for Falsifying Results of Drug Tests Used to Medically Kidnap Children

The worst offender, by far, in medically kidnapping children by use of a medical diagnostic test, is within the field of radiology and finding “proof” of child abuse simply by looking at x-rays.

This whole field has developed a recent new class of pediatricians “certified” as “Child Abuse Pediatricians,” and the lucrative jobs of these doctors depend on them finding abused children and putting them into the lucrative child trafficking network known as “foster care.”

We have actually published an eBook on this topic, or you can look up individual cases on our MedicaKidnap.com website to learn how this evil system works.

When it comes to diagnosing “influenza,” we have exposed the fraud there as well, as pre-COVID-19 the CDC simply used estimates of cases of the flu, since they cannot verify actual numbers each year by diagnostic testing.

Annual Flu Deaths Scam Unwittingly Exposed and Replaced by the COVID Deaths Scam

So COVID-19 allowed them to just further exploit the fraud of diagnostic testing to create fear and panic, and achieve their goals of enslaving the public and rolling out their experimental mRNA injections.

With this latest announcement by the CDC that they are now going to retire the RT-PCR Diagnostic tests and replace them with other tests that can now test both COVID and influenza, it is pretty easy to see what their game plan is for later this year.

Just about everyone in the U.S. will be able to be tested “positive” for something by this Fall when the flu season starts.

This will be the “Hegelian principle” implementation for 2021. The government creates the problem, and then they create the solution, which we know now is more “vaccines” for everything in life that ails us, and try to punish those who don’t want to play their game.

I’m ready. Are you?

___________________

**Comment**

The CDC often quietly updates its website with inconvenient truth, when it works in their favor.  With COVID, this new information will make it possible for them to now jack the numbers of flu cases since they literally quit counting them making everything COVID.  I’m sure this will also be used to push the flu vaccine, which has never been effective, doesn’t prevent transmission, and actually increases your risk of contracting non-flu respiratory illness by 65%.

But there’s even something more diabolical going on here.

According to Jon Rappoport, the CDC/FDA is essentially confessing that they didn’t have a “virus” to begin with when they concocted the test using contrived samples of the virus. In short, they invented synthetic gene sequences and stated these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2. There is still no proof there is something called SARS-CoV-2. This article shows that the sequence used in PCR testing is present in ALL human DNA which equates C8 as a foreign hostile material and indeed the coronavirus – Covid19 – itself.

Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.

BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.

Rappoport states virology’s version of “we isolated the virus” to mean they created a soup in the lab containing monkey cells, toxic chemicals, drugs and random genetic material.  Researchers than assume that cells die due to a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup, therefore the virus must be the killer agent in the mucus – when it very well could be any of the components within the contrived soup.

The “new and improved” tests are nothing more than a money-maker for our corrupt public health ‘authorities’, who own patents on virtually every aspect surrounding COVID, including the spike protein.
They will now continue spinning their narrative utilizing these phoney tests.

Regarding Lyme/MSIDS, the CDC quietly updated their website from previously insisting Lyme can’t be spread congenitally to now admitting it’s possible, but rare.  But, as Lyme advocate Carl Tuttle points out: How can it be rare when nobody’s counting? The timing is impeccable.  Whenever there is a Lyme vaccine in the pipeline, the CDC finally admits how devastating and prolific tick-borne illness is.  I stand firmly with Tuttle that No Lyme vaccine should be considered until persistent infection is recognized.  But this will never happen because if they admit to persistent infection, they are also admitting that a vaccine would be ineffective against it.

The CDC often makes bold proclamations without a shred of evidence.  

For more on the PCR scam:

This completely bogus test has caused irreparable harm.  It’s been used to falsely elevate cases, then used to make the COVID injections appear to be working (by lowering the cycle threshold).  It has been used to make it appear that fully “vaccinated” people aren’t contracting or dying from COVID (called “break-through” cases) when many are, as well as to quarantine people, keep them from working, and causing unsubstantiated fear in the public.

This is not new.  Lyme/MSIDS patients have also been in a war due to faulty, arbitrary testing  that’s been rigged for a pre-determined outcome.

Category:

Activism, Testing, Viruses

NIH Developed Stabilized Spike Protein in 2019 – Before Identification of SARS-CoV-2

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-021-00912-9

A network analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine patents

Nature Biotechnology volume 39, pages546–548 (2021)Cite this article

A preliminary network analysis highlights the complex intellectual property landscape behind mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on global health and highlighted the importance of international cooperation to effectively combat SARS-CoV-2. Since the discovery and publication of the virus’s genome in January 2020, scientists have rushed to develop vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics on an unprecedented timescale. To date there are 80 vaccines in clinical trials and 70 more in clinical development, setting the stage for some of the fastest vaccine development and testing in modern history1. The vaccine technology platforms used by the most promising vaccine candidates range from viral vector–based and protein-based technologies to mRNA and lipid nanoparticle technology. Despite these impressive scientific achievements, barriers such as the vaccine cold chain and multiple forms of intellectual property (IP) protection stand in the way of equitable access and fair allocation.

Webs of intellectual property claims underpin the marketing of many vaccines. For example, the underlying technology used to develop a vaccine can be protected by patents, while manufacturing methods and techniques (know-how) can be protected by trade secrets.  (See link for article)

___________________

**Comment**

This important paper looks at patent applications and intellectual property claims. What is important to note is the revelation that our very own National Institutes of Health (NIH) developed the stabilized version of the spike protein used in COVID injections all the way back in 2019 – before the identification of SARS-CoV-2. 

The NIH has four other patent applications on a novel coronavirus vaccine. They have been studying mRNA for decades and the NIH patents are connected to more than a dozen vaccine developers. Please remember, the CDC is a vaccine manufacturer, owning over 50 vaccine patents, purchases and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually, and is not a neutral government agency. CDC scientists have exposed a long litany of agency corruption.

Also, important to understand is Youtube’s parent company Google has direct investment in the AstraZeneca/Oxford COVID “vaccine.” This is why YouTube censors anything that threatens the rollout and future profits of COVID-19 gene modification therapies.  Further:

  • Google is also partnered directly with the U.S. military, which is increasingly working on a transhumanist agenda
  • DARPA is heavily invested in transhumanist technologies for the use in soldiers, including brain-machine interfaces and other even more extreme ideas. They recently teamed up with the Wellcome Trust to create something called “Wellcome Leap,” a movement to usher in transhumanism
  • Investors are excited because the COVID-19 shot will most likely become an annual “vaccine” that is updated each season much like the seasonal flu vaccine  (which isn’t effective or safe)

I know that it feels daily as if we are stuck in a SyFy novel, but the truth is often stranger than fiction.  The reason they can get away with pushing gene therapy is by giving them the label of “vaccines,” to obtain Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).  Without this, slight of hand, the injections would be forced to go through lengthy safety testing, which has all been bypassed.  Please also see:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/07/09/covid-vaccine-invented-before-covid-whats-going-on/

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, German physician and epidemiologist, wonders whether the drug industry may simply be using the EUA to learn more about how the mRNA technology actually works, using the public as guinea pigs.  He points out that some injections have been found to be nothing but saline, which suggests some people are actually getting a placebo injection, even though they’re being told they’re getting the real thing and they’ve not signed up for a formal trial.

Are “undercover” studies being performed that we’ve not been told about? There are many unanswered questions about what’s really going on with this COVID “vaccine” rollout. 

In the case of the U.S., the main manufacturer, not just for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, [but also] a few others, is that same company, Emergent BioSolutions, which has an awful track record. The Pentagon lost a lawsuit in 2004 where they were accused of using U.S. military personnel as lab rats in an experimental off-label use of that particular anthrax vaccine they were producing …

Wodarg is very concerned that COVID-19 “vaccine” makers may be experimenting with various amounts of lipid nanoparticles, which could help explain some of the acutely lethal effects, and perhaps even the transfer phenomenon that appears to be occurring between vaccinated individuals and unvaccinated ones.

Of course, we don’t know if secret comparison trials are being done without our knowledge. What we do know is that Moderna has been working on mRNA vaccine technology for many years, and had been unable to solve the nanolipid toxicity problem. When the dosage was too low, the mRNA didn’t stick around long enough for the drug to work, and when too high, it became toxic.

Despite years of work, they were never able to determine an effective nontoxic dose of mRNA in nanolipid. At least they never announced success. Now we’re supposed to take their word that they got it all figured out in less than a year? No, most likely, they never did figure it out and are using the cover of the pandemic to release an untested vaccine on the public under the guise of emergency use authorization.

Effective nontoxic dosing is probably what the public COVID vaccination campaign is going to help them determine, so that knowledge can then be applied to other gene modification drugs and vaccines. It’s convenient in the extreme, seeing how they are not accountable for any of the damage and death their products are causing, and their unremunerated human test subjects now number in the billions.

As noted b Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, German attorney and co-founder of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, it appears we’re observing “the coming out of a very long-running strategy” to reduce the population and alter those who are left.  Source

In this powerful paper, posted all the way back in Sept. 2020, Dr. James Fetzer follows the long chronology which clearly demonstrates this ‘pandemic’ has been planned all along.  

It is my firm belief that the latest crack-down on those revealing this pertinent information has to do with the fact they are effectively getting to the root of the matter and need to be squashed.

  • In an unprecedented move of tyrannical proportions, the current regime is singling out 12 individuals for “killing people” due to simply giving information to base informed consent upon.
  • Public health ‘officials’ are wrongly pinning COVID cases upon the unvaccinated, despite testimony of true vaccine experts who state mass vaccination campaigns drive viral mutations, and the fact there are thousands of “break-through” cases – some of which end in death. There is also the data that shows the most “vaccinated” countries are the ones experiencing surges in cases, while the least-vaccinated countries are not. As of July, 5,492 fully “vaccinated” people have been hospitalized and over 1,000 have died.  Source  But this has been seriously understated as the CDC is lowering the PCR cycle threshold only for those getting the injections to downplay the fact many “fully vaccinated” are contracting COVID.
  • These officials also have issued an advisory telling Big Tech to to impose consequences (censoring 1st amendment free speech) on anyone defying the top-down accepted narrative.
  • This article states Facebook now says medical studies published in peer-reviewed journals are FAKE NEWS if they conclude things it disagrees with. 
  • And to continue their efforts to convince everyone to take their lucrative jab, they are now working with SMS carriers to dispel “misinformation” not just on social media, but in your private text messages, yet state they are “keeping politics out of the effort,” while they continue to deny life-saving treatments to suffering patients, deny the fact natural immunity to COVID may last years if not decades, and that previous infection may cut risk of reinfection by 84%.
Welcome to the new normal, where public health ‘officials’ censor experts trying to help patients.

As stated by Dr. McCullough, “All roads lead to the vaccine.”

For Lyme/MSIDS patients, this fact is nothing new.

Category:

vaccines, Viruses

COVID-19 Vaccine Associated Parkinson’s Disease

https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-vaccine-associated-parkinsons-disease-a-prion-disease-signal-in-the-uk-yellow-card-adverse-event-database-1746.pdf

COVID-19 Vaccine Associated Parkinson’s Disease, A Prion Disease Signal in the UK Yellow Card Adverse Event Database

Citation: Classen JB. COVID-19 Vaccine Associated Parkinson’s Disease, A Prion Disease Signal in the UK Yellow Card Adverse Event Database. J Med – Clin Res & Rev. 2021; 5(7): 1-6.

* Correspondence: J. Bart Classen, MD, Classen Immunotherapies, Inc, 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester, MD 21102, Tel: 410-377-8526. Received: 25 June 2021; Accepted: 18 July 2021

ABSTRACT

Many have argued that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its mRNA sequence, found in all COVID-19 vaccines, are priongenic. The UK’s Yellow Card database of COVID-19 vaccine adverse event reports was evaluated for signals consistent with a pending epidemic of COVID vaccine induced prion disease. Adverse event reaction rates from AstraZeneca’s vaccine were compared to adverse event rates for Pfizer’s COVID vaccines. The vaccines employ different technologies allowing for potential differences in adverse event rates but allowing each to serve as a control group for the other. The analysis showed a highly statistically significant and clinically relevant (2.6-fold) increase in Parkinson’s disease, a prion disease, in the AstraZeneca adverse reaction reports compared to the Pfizer vaccine adverse reaction reports (p= 0.000024). These results are consistent with monkey toxicity studies showing infection with SARS-CoV-2 results in Lewy Body formation.

The findings suggest that regulatory approval, even under an emergency use authorization, for COVID vaccines was premature and that widespread use should be halted until full long term safety studies evaluating prion toxicity has been complete. Alternative vaccines like the Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) vaccine should be explored for those desiring immunization against COVID-19.

___________________

**Comment**

This is paper #2 from Classen, an immunologist and former NIH contract scientist, showing COVID injections to be extremely dangerous as they can cause prion disease. In his current paper he utilizes 6-months of UK adverse event data on AstraZeneca (uses GM adenoviruses) and Pfizer injections (uses lipid-encapsulated synthetic mRNA), whose goal is to stimulate the spike protein and antibodies, which show clear signs of causing symptoms of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s ALS, and others.  

The study showed nervous disorders, tremors, and sleep disturbances, after the COVID injections – all of which are symptoms of prion disease.  

Classen is concerned because the reporting system is set up to report acute events, not neurodegenerative issues, which can be non-specific or overlap with other conditions, which could occur years or decades later.  Due to this, findings could be exponentially higher.

Paper #1 which analyzed the Pfizer injection is here and points out many important details to consider, including an important excerpt from the summary:

Many have raised the warning that the current epidemic of COVID-19 is actually the result of an bioweapons attack released in part by individuals in the United States government [10,11]. Such a theory is not far fetched given that the 2001 anthrax attack in the US originated at Fort Detrick, a US army bioweapon facility. Because the FBI’s anthrax investigation was closed against the advice of the lead FBI agent in the case, there are likely conspirators still working in the US government. In such a scenario the primary focus of stopping a bioweapons attack must be to apprehend the conspirators or the attacks will never cease. Approving a vaccine, utilizing novel RNA technology without extensive testing is extremely dangerous. The vaccine could be a bioweapon and even more dangerous than the original infection.

Important excerpt:

This analysis should serve as an urgent warning to those mindlessly following advice of politicians and public health officials regarding COVID immunization. Both groups have had a dismal record of protecting the health of the public. US public health officials ran the infamous Tuskegee syphilis study allowing people of color to die from syphilis because the public health officials refused to inform the patients, they had syphilis and that a treatment existed. There have been numerous less well-known experiments on prisoners and other vulnerable populations in North America. The infamous Nazi physician Josef Mengele was a public health doctor.…

5 doctors state the injections are bioweapons & what you can do about it. The injections are NOT “vaccines” but cause YOU to manufacture spike proteins – perhaps indefinitely – the very thing causing illness. Those getting the injections are possibly transmitting this spike protein to those foregoing the injections.  

 

Dr. Stephanie Seneff – Risk of Prion Disease video

(Approx. 3 Min)

Category:

Alzheimer's, research, vaccines, Viruses