Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

WHO Update

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/federal/who-update/

WHO Update

Working treaty draft and next steps

The World Health Organization (WHO) has been pushing forward with preparations for an agreement to create a global health governance. Although it has been referred to as a “pandemic treaty,” it’s been openly discussed that the agreement should cover much more. A summary of “key messages” from organizations interested in such a governance stressed the new agreement “should be linked with the global response to noncommunicable diseases,” and even included a suggestion that the agreement should happen at the United Nations (WHO’s parent organization), “in recognition of the fact that a pandemic response was larger than the health sector.”[i]

Nowhere has this been described as an agreement that would only be in effect in case of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), but it would instead set up standing surveillance methods in attempts to prevent another pandemic.

The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), a group designed to create and present the proposed agreement to voting members of the WHO at the World Health Assembly in 2024, has been meeting and collecting input from Member States and private or organizational stakeholders since February 2021. On July 13, 2022, the WHO Secretariat released a working draft of the document for consideration at the next meeting of the INB on July 18-20, 2022.[ii]

As a working draft, the document is incomplete, with suggested language and objectives. It relies heavily upon input from Member States and other stakeholders who were invited to use an online portal to respond to pre-written suggested focus areas and language, as well as contribute their own open-ended suggestions for the agreement.

The agreement is shaping up to include “four cross-cutting strategic themes of equity, governance and leadership, systems and tools, and financing,” as well as “five subthemes: access; transfer of technology and know-how; coordination, collaboration and cooperation; multisectoral actions; and capacities and systems strengthening.”

Here are some highlights of the working draft:

  • Governance mechanisms “could include” enabling “collaboration and cooperation across the United Nations system and other international and regional intergovernmental organizations and non-State actors and bodies as a means of strengthening the implementation” of the agreement.
  • Universal health coverage is mentioned 11 times in the document, as a goal to combat and respond to pandemics.
  • Data sharing across government and industries is a foundation of the governance plan and is being referred to as “transparency.”
  • Another principle in the document is “solidarity,” explained as, “[i]ntensified international cooperation, based on a set of specific obligations for Parties (especially, but not limited to, obligations from developed to developing countries) is required to prevent, prepare for, respond to and recover from pandemics.”
  • There will be international efforts to curtail free speech by addressing “infodemic management, public information and risk communication” especially through use of social media.

How is the WHO considering national sovereignty?

The definition of sovereignty is not limited to self-determination, but also includes “the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to other States and their peoples.” It is reasonable that the freedom of one country should not infringe upon another, but when it comes to a germ, can any state truly be sovereign under this definition?

The first public meeting of the INB was held April 12-13, 2022. There were 36,294 written comments submitted. The WHO Secretariat summarized that “[a] number of submissions referred to respect for national autonomy and sovereignty, noting that subnational and cultural bodies, and local health entities were better placed to make health decisions at the national level. Such a focus on sovereignty was justified by the differences in national health systems” (emphasis added). Let’s never forget that those working for the World Health Organization think sovereignty needs to be justified in order to be claimed.

The Secretariat admitted, “The majority of written contributions proposed that no international instrument should be established.”[iii]

There’s no opportunity for public input at the upcoming INB meeting. The next chance the public may have to comment is the end of September, 2022. [iv] We do not yet know what the stipulations will be for oral or written comment, but Stand for Health Freedom will alert our Advocates when it is time to make our voices heard.

What does this mean for Americans?

We must be vigilant to protect local authority. Once power is handed over, it is not given back. We can see evidence of this right now in the perpetual state of emergency declared by both our president and the secretary of Health and Human Services. The law was written to give authority to widen the reach of federal authority in a declared emergency, but there was no sunset on that power, nor any true guidance on what an emergency looks like, or when it ends.

Health advocates in the state of Georgia were able to remove World Health Organization International Classifications of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) definitions of illness being included in a recently passed state law. [v]They recognized the danger of linking state power over health care with a global definition — if the rights of a citizen in a state are linked to decisions made by a global body that is unaccountable to American voters, then the decisions made by that global body affect people in their communities, and people have no say in the matter once the link is made.

Steps You Can Take

Step One: We can learn from the Georgia example and watch our state bills for links to the World Health Organization. Get involved with your local health freedom groups. For a list of state actions by organizations already partnered with Stand for Health Freedom, click the button below. If your state does not yet have a group, help build the health freedom movement by finding or mobilizing local advocates and contacting SHF.

Step Two: Stay up to date with state, federal, and global events and happenings by joining SHF to receive health policy analysis and legislative alerts right to your inbox.

Step Three: Sign our petition to let the White House know Americans will not allow health sovereignty to be taken away by a global governance.

Step Four: Spread the word by sharing this post on social media, or with your friends and loved ones.

Step five: Support HR419, No Taxpayer Funding for the WHO.  Call your Senator and Reps.  Talking points:

My name is _________, I live in zip code ___________. I wanted to inform the Senator/Representative that our President, with HHS, is on the verge of joining international agreements that will funnel billions of U.S. tax dollars to the World Health Organization. At the end of May, the WHO will vote on amendments to International Health Regulations that would increase the use of declarations of global health emergencies and the surveillance capabilities of the WHO in countries around the globe. Next year, the WHO is scheduled to vote on a pandemic treaty being drafted right now to create more funding agreements and power centralized at the WHO. I need you to take action to stop the WHO from using fear of disease to destroy our Constitution. Please defund the WHO and check the power of the President to make these international agreements that will put Americans in danger!

References & Sources

[i] https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb1/A_INB1_10-en.pdf

[ii] https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb2/A_INB2_3-en.pdf

[iii] https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb1/A_INB1_10-en.pdf

[iv] https://inb.who.int/home/public-hearings

[v] https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legislation/document/20212022/210977

_________________

For more:

According to an article written last year, the U.S. is on course to become a ‘digital dictatorship’ under a proposed biomedical research agency. This agency would merge national security with public health, a perfect formula for a dangerous agenda that would destroy medical freedom as we know it.

This agency would “use both physical and mental health ‘warning signs’ to prevent outbreaks of disease or violence before they occur. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic ‘pre-crime’ organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness as well as ‘wrongthink.’”

This article proves the political interference at HHS as well as the fact governments are working in lockstep to bring in digital I.D.s & a social credit system.

The CDC already rules both research and the medical profession with an iron fist and medical freedom is increasingly under fire.
All of this sounds like a perfect prelude to global “vaccine” passports.

And all of this would fit perfectly with a global system that would overrule the U.S. constitution.  Do not let the dangling carrot of “Universal Health Care Coverage” fool you.  Remember when they told us we could quit wearing masks if we all got “vaccinated?” 

Millions Will Die From COVID “Vax” by 2028: Dr. David Martin

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/07/16/death-from-covid-vaccine

Will 100 Million Die From the COVID Vax by 2028?

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked

Story at-a-glance

  • David Martin, Ph.D., presents evidence that COVID-19 injections are not vaccines, but bioweapons that are being used as a form of genocide across the global population
  • The spike protein that the COVID-19 shots manufacture is a known biologic agent of concern
  • Martin believes the number that may die may have been revealed back in 2011, when the World Health Organization announced their “decade of vaccination”
  • The objective for the decade of vaccination was a population reduction of 15% globally, which would be about 700 million people dead; in the U.S., this may amount to between 75 million and 100 million people dying from COVID-19 shots
  • When asked what timeframe these people may die in, Martin suggested “there’s a lot of economic reasons why people hope that it’s between now and 2028”
  • The projected illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs by 2028 suggests the “fewer people who are recipients of these programs, the better;” Martin believes this may be why people 65 and over were targeted with COVID-19 shots first

In this revealing interview with Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com, David Martin, Ph.D., presents evidence that COVID-19 injections are not vaccines but bioweapons that are being used as a form of genocide across the global population.1

In March 2022, Martin filed a federal lawsuit against President Biden, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services alleging that COVID-19 shots turn the body into a biological weapons factory, manufacturing spike protein. Not only is the term “vaccination” misleading when referring to COVID-19 shots, it’s inaccurate since they are actually a form of gene therapy.2

“And we are not only not going to be sued for, you know, any libel or misinformation, we are actually holding people criminally accountable for their domestic terrorism, their crimes against humanity and the story of the coronavirus weaponization that goes back to 1998,” Martin says.3

SARS-CoV-2 Has Been in the Works for Decades

Martin has been in the business of tracking patent applications and approvals since 1998. His company, M-Cam International Innovation Risk Management, is the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries. M-Cam has also monitored biological and chemical weapons treaty violations on behalf of the U.S. government, following the anthrax scare in September 2001.4

According to Martin, there are more than 4,000 patents relating to the SARS coronavirus. His company has also done a comprehensive review of the financing of research involving the manipulation of coronaviruses that gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the beta coronavirus family.

Much of the research was funded by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci.5 Martin explained:6

“I think it’s important for your listeners and viewers to remember that it was 1999 when Anthony Fauci and Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill decided to start weaponizing coronavirus they patented in 2002 — and you heard that date correctly, that’s a year before the SARS outbreak in China.

The first time they patented what they called an ‘infectious replication defective chimera’ of coronavirus. And let’s unpack what that means.

Infectious means that it actually is more lethal to the target. Replication defective means its damage is primarily to the target and not to the target’s family or friends or community or anything else. And in 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented the replication defective infectious coronavirus chimera, which then became the first instance of SARS.

And it was perfected in 2013 to 2016 during the gain of function moratorium, where the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill was given an exemption from the gain of function moratorium so they could continue to weaponize the virus to the point where in 2016, Ralph Baric published a paper in which he said the Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one, coronavirus, was ‘poised for human emergence,’ so they knew this all along.

You know, they knew it was a bioweapon since 2005. They knew it was effective at taking out populations, harming populations, intimidating and coercing populations. And they did that all very intentionally for the purpose of destroying humanity.”

COVID-19 Shots Are an ‘Act of Bioterrorism’

According to Martin, the spike protein that the COVID-19 shots manufacture is a computer simulation of a chimera of the spike protein of coronavirus. “It is, in fact, not a coronavirus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction to make the human body produce a toxin, and that toxin has been scheduled as a known biologic agent of concern with respect to biological weapons for the last now decade and a half,” he said.7

Rather than being a public health measure as they were widely campaigned to be, COVID-19 shots are an act of bioweapons and bioterrorism. Martin shared that in 2015, Dr. Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance that funneled research dollars from the NIAID to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus research, stated:8

“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”

Daszak, who Martin refers to as “the money launderer in chief,” “actually stated that this entire exercise was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. And that is their own words, not my interpretation,” Martin said.9

Martin: 100 Million May Die Due to COVID Shots

Both Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 shots contain nucleic acid sequences that are not part of nature and have not been previously introduced to the human body. This amounts to a genetic engineering experiment that did not go through animal studies or clinical trials.

However, already people are dying from the shots and, Martin states, “many more will” due to issues such as blood clots, damage to the cardiovascular system and problems with liver, kidney and pulmonary function.10

An onslaught of reproductive and cancer cases related to the shots are also anticipated. “The fact of the matter is an enormous number of people who are injected are already carrying the seeds of their own demise,” Martin said.11 As for how many may die, Martin believes the numbers may have been revealed back in 2011, when the World Health Organization announced their “decade of vaccination”:12

“Based on their own 2011 estimate, and … this is a chilling estimate, but we just have to put it out there … When the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Chinese CDC, the Jeremy Farrar Wellcome Trust and others published The Decade of Vaccination for the World Health Organization back in 2011 their stated objective was a population reduction of 15% of the world’s population.

Put that in perspective, that’s about 700 million people dead … and that would put the U.S. participation in that certainly as a pro rata of injected population somewhere between 75 and 100 million people.”

When asked what timeframe these people may die in, Martin suggested “there’s a lot of economic reasons why people hope that it’s between now and 2028.”13 This is because of “a tiny little glitch on the horizon” — the projected illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs by 2028.

“So the fewer people who are recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better,” Martin said. “Not surprisingly, it’s probably one of the motivations that led to the recommendation that people over the age of 65 were the first ones getting injected.”14 Other populations at risk are caregivers, including health care providers, and others in the workforce who were forced to be injected, such as pilots.

“Why is it that we’re suddenly having 700 flights a day being canceled because, allegedly, airlines don’t have pilots? … the dirty secret … is there a lot of pilots who are having microvascular problems and clotting problems, and that keeps them out of the cockpit, which is a good place to not have them if they’re going to throw a clot for a stroke or a heart attack,” Martin said.

“But the problem is we’re going to start seeing that exact same phenomenon in the health care industry and at a much larger scale, which means we now have, in addition to the problem of the actual morbidity and mortality, meaning people getting sick and people dying.

We actually have that targeting the health care industry writ large, which means we are going to have doctors and nurses who are going to be among the sick and the dead. And that means that the sick and the dying also do not get care.”15

Why COVID Shots May Change Your DNA

It’s been stressed by the media and public health officials that COVID-19 shots do not alter DNA. However, Martin brings attention to a little-known grant from the National Science Foundation, known as Darwinian chemical systems,16 which involved research to incorporate mRNA into targeted genomes. According to Martin:17

“Moderna was started … on the back of a 10-year National Science Foundation grant. And that grant was called Darwinian chemical systems … the project that gave rise to the Moderna company itself was a project where they were specifically figuring out how to get mRNA to write itself into the genome of whatever target they were going after.

That could be a single-celled organism, it could be a multi-celled organism or it could be a human. And the fact of the matter is Moderna was started on the back of having proven that mRNA can be transfected and write itself into the human genome.”

It is completely unknown what the short- or long-term effects of the spike protein analog that’s inside people who received COVID-19 injections will be. But with respect to alteration of the genome, Martin states that data show mRNA has the capacity to write into the DNA of humans, and “as such, the long-term effects are not going to merely be symptomatic. The long-term effects are going to be the human genome of injected individuals is going to be altered.”18

Fraud Removes Big Pharma’s Liability Shield

The 2001 anthrax attack, which came out of medical and defense research, led to the passage of the PREP Act, which removed liability for manufacturers of emergency medical countermeasures.

This means that as long as the U.S. is under a state of emergency, things like COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed under emergency use authorization. And as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect, the makers of these experimental gene therapies are not financially liable for any harm that comes from their use.

That is, provided they’re “vaccines.” If these injections are NOT vaccines, then the liability shield falls away, because there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy. Further, lawsuits that can prove the companies engaged in fraud will also negate the liability shield. Martin states:19

“One of the convenient things about the PREP Act is the immunity shield from liability actually is only as good as the absence of fraud. Because if there was fraud in the promulgation of the events, leading to an emergency use authorization, then all of the immunity shield gets wiped out.

So the reason why it is so important for conversations like the one we’re having to actually be promoted and be advanced is because the pharmaceutical companies — and this includes Pfizer and Moderna and J&J — know they are perpetuating a fraud. The great thing about this is when that fraud is established, 100% of the liability flows back to them.

… when a fraud was the basis for a fraud, then we actually have a number of other legal remedies that allow you to pierce that veil. So in the end, there’s no question … and it’s quite evident based on the current mortality and morbidity data that given the fact that when it comes to biological weapons and bioterror each count comes with $100 million penalty. That’s what the federal statute gives us.

The penalty for corporate domestic terrorism, when you have per count $100 million a pop liabilities — that is an existential threat that takes a company like Pfizer or takes a company like Moderna out of existence. And that is what we’re working for every day.”

If you’d like to follow the progress of the ongoing legal cases seeking to expose the truth — that a criminal organization is seeking to obtain control over the global population via the creation of patented bioweapons marketed as novel viruses and injections — you can find all the details at ProsecuteNow.io, a website compiled by Martin and colleagues.20

____________________

More on Martin:

Conflicted Much? WEF ‘Anti-Corruption’ Champion Also Happens to Be Pfizer Director & Reuters CEO. Who Benefits?

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/07/08/wef-anti-corruption-czat-is-pfizer-director/

CONFLICTED MUCH? – World Economic Forum ‘Anti-Corruption’ Champion Is Pfizer Director AND Reuters CEO.

Seems legit.

Jim Smith – whose concurrent roles as a Pfizer board member and Reuters CEO appear to pose a conflict of interest – serves as a board member of the World Economic Forum’s anti-corruption initiative.

Smith’s leading role with the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Partnering Against Corruption Initiative follows controversy over his position at the pharmaceutical giant and mainstream media outlet, which frequently reports on Pfizer. Reuters has published tens of thousands of articles covering or mentioning Pfizer, though the articles never disclose Smith’s affiliation with either entity.

Smith serves on the board of the WEF’s Partnering Against Corruption Initiative, dubbed the “leading business voice on anti-corruption and transparency.”

(See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

Another perfect example of why we are in this very ugly place in history. 

People are allowed to have severe conflicts of interest and yet set international agendas.

Here we have a person, supposedly addressing corruption, who is lamenting public perception that institutions are not acting in the interest of the public.  He also just happens to be CEO of a large media outlet (Reuters) and also a board member in a “vaccine” manufacturing company as well as the extremely controversial WEF who essentially wants to take over the world.  Nice.

This person laments that public confidence has been corroded by “near-term priorities,” “payoffs propelled by election-cycle politics” and “quarterly results,” yet is guilty of partaking in all three as the WEF has shamelessly exploited COVID to advance its “Great Reset” to abolish private property ownership.

You can read more about the World Economic Forum at www.TakeDownTheWEF.com

Please also see this very informative video about Klaus Schwab, founder of WEF & evil mastermind of “The Great Reset.” And this article does a great job explaining WEF plans.

http://  Approx. 10 Min

0:00 – Who is Klaus Schwab?

0:46 – A quick refresher on the World Economic Forum

1:51 – Who can join the WEF?

3:05 – The WEF’s financial activities

4:18 – How Schwab is getting richer

5:38 – FTX insert 6:42 – Klaus’ controversial actions

9:41 – Some final thoughts

____________________

http://  Approx. 20 Min

This May Have Been the Greatest Crime in History

July 8, 2022

News host Tucker Carlson argues no one benefited more from the COVID pandemic than China.
  • 22 million Americans lost their jobs in the first two months of the lockdowns. Five million never went back to work.  National debt rose by nearly 10 trillion dollars, including our debt to China. Tech companies thrived while middle class America suffered.  It changed the balance of power in the world forever, putting China on top.
  • Drug overdoses, suicide, obesity, anxiety, alcoholism, illiteracy, crime, etc. skyrocketed. Marriages and birthrates dropped.
  • Health officials have lied so consistently about the true death counts from COVID, we will never probably know the truth.
  • Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance received millions in grants from Fauci & boasted about manipulating coronaviruses in a lab right before the outbreak.
  • Apparently, mainstream media is getting their marching orders from China. China pays American media a lot of money – tens of millions of dollars in advertising.  Instead of investigating where COVID originated, the NY Times COVID reporter decided to play the race card. The racist talking point became prevalent in March, 2020 – exactly when Chinese owned state media tweeted that terms like Wuhan & coronavirus were racist.  Before this, (Feb. 2020) American media continuously called it the Wuhan corona, or Chinese virus, etc., showing clearly they are bought out by China.
  • Our leaders appear to not care where COVID came from.
  • When a reporter asked Biden why he hasn’t asked China to be transparent on COVID origins, Biden just smiled and walked away.  Seriously
  • The same Wuhan lab is now working on Monkeypox.

Conflicts of interest have crept into every area of life:

The AMA, AphA, ASHP, in lock-step with the FDA, continues to promise to fight ‘misinformation’ – an overused & highly politicized term that simply means anything that defies the accepted narrative created by conflict-riddled public health ‘authorities’ that have patents on virtually every aspect of COVID.

If you are unaware, we are in a war for truth.

For more:

Latest Pfizer Data Dump: More Deaths & Injuries

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/deaths-injuries-pfizer-vaccine-trial-document-dump

More Deaths, Injuries Revealed in Latest Pfizer Vaccine Trial Document Dump

This month’s release of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine documents by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration reveals three more reports of deaths among vaccine trial participants and more instances of Pfizer listing injuries as “not related” to the vaccine.

Important excerpt:

Of the approximately 80,000 pages released this month, the most revelatory is a 3,611-page “confidential” document with no title — only the file name “fa_interim_narrative_sensitive.”

The document contains information about vaccine trial participants who died, who sustained adverse events during the trial or who contracted COVID-19 during the trial.

(See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

We need to be thankful for those willing to go through thousands of pages, which are purposely obscure. We also need to be thankful for those willing to dig through mounds of information to discover that the CDC is actually deleting VAERS reports and admits it never monitored VAERS for safety signals.

I mean, why bother?  If we repeat “‘vaccines’ are safe and effective” enough times, it will simply be true.

Recently, an 8 year old Mexican boy died 5 days after the Pfizer shot, and the same paper describes how an Oregon Ducks tight end died in a “tragic accident,” which is happening at an unprecedented scale nowadays, but is of course, is #ABV (anything but the “vaccine”).

Go here for a mounting list of adverse reactions & deaths reported to VAERS,

Fauci, aka Dr. Evil & a real-life spin “doctor” admits the shots ‘Don’t protect overly well’ against infection but continues the false narrative that they somehow prevent severe illness, despite data & reality showing otherwise.

While You Were Distracted by Boris, A UK Report Confirms the “Vaxxed” Account for 94% of all COVID Deaths Since April – 90% of Which Were Jabbed 3-4 Times

**UPDATE August 2022**

This article shows that the COVID shots give ZERO protection against death according to ONS data.  And this article, using data from the Netherlands & Canada, shows that “vaccine” effectiveness actually is negative against serious disease and death and that the “vaxxed” are actually more likely to be hospitalized or admitted to the ICU with COVID.

The data confirms that in the real world, regardless of how many doses of “vaccines” someone may have, it makes absolutely no difference to the likelihood that they may die from Covid, and in fact are making things worse.

Dr. Nass explains in this article how the shots don’t prevent transmission, severe illness or death and that we’ve been lied to repeatedly.

Quietly this month, a New York Supreme Court judge ruled that regulations mandating that people infected with or exposed to highly contagious communicable diseases be quarantined are a violation of state law, declaring them null and void. The Isolation and Quarantine procedures, known as Rule 2.13, were enacted in February.

It also appears France has said “no more” to COVID tyranny, and has managed to even unite divergent political parties. The National Assembly rejected government powers that would have demanded travelers show proof of “vaccination” or a negative test when entering France. The Prime Minister condemned this and pushed back stating there was collusion between the extremes. Some are calling it “The Shot Heard Around the World.”

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/11/boris-distraction-uk-gov-revealed-triple-vaccinated-94percent-covid-deaths/

Whilst you were distracted by Boris resigning, the UK Gov. quietly published a report confirming the Vaccinated account for 94% of all COVID-19 Deaths since April, 90% of which were Triple/Quadruple Jabbed

A report that was quietly published by the UK Government, just hours before Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced his resignation, reveals that Covid-19 deaths have risen dramatically among the triple vaccinated population in England over the past couple of months whilst declining drastically among the unvaccinated population.

With the most recent figures showing the vaccinated population in England accounted for a shocking 94% of all Covid-19 Deaths in April and May, and 90% of those deaths were among the triple/quadruple vaccinated population.

(See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • In March the UK Health Security Agency announced it would no longer publish “vaccination” status of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths due to the end of free universal testing, but this was a lie. The real reason was that the data clearly showed the “vaxxed” were suffering immense immune system damage and had higher cases, hospitalizations, and deaths than the unvaxxed. (see charts in top link)
  • Now there is even more evidence as the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has just published data on deaths by “vax” status.  The charts say it all:

Email Ad

The percentage of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status in England between 1st April and 31st May 2022, according to the latest ONS dataset published just hours before Boris Johnson’s resignation:

With news like this being swept under the rug by the mainstream media, it makes you wonder what else they will attempt to hide in the coming weeks?

BINGO