Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Inquiry to the Inspector General for Scientific Integrity of the Klempner Antibiotic Trials For Lyme Disease

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/30864725

Inquiry to the Inspector General for Scientific Integrity (Klempner antibiotic trials)

Carl Tuttle

Hudson, NH, United States

Aug 26, 2022 — 

The open inquiry below has been acknowledged by the National Science Foundation Office of Inspector General and Director of the Office of Research Integrity. Dr. Peggy Fischer has since retired so I am now communicating with her superiors. Updates to follow…

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “pfischer@nsf.gov” <pfischer@nsf.gov>
Date: 08/22/2022 1:29 PM
Subject: NIH funded study in 2001 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000938
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF)
Dr. Peggy Fischer
Associate Inspector General for Scientific Integrity
National Science Foundation
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1135
Arlington, VA 22230

Dear Dr. Fischer,

I would like to call attention to the 2018 letter below addressed to Dr. Mark Klempner Principal Investigator of the so-called “Klempner Antibiotic Trials” for Lyme disease (NIH funded in 2001) which by the way were stopped after only 90 days.

The reason for contacting you is strait forward; I believe (as do countless others in the medical/academic fields) that these studies were fatally flawed and set the stage for unimaginable pain and suffering all across America. The letter to Klempner below describes the issue and the attached document with over 360 references concluding the exact opposite of the Klempner findings, warrants an investigation.

Persistence of The Lyme Disease Bacterium, Borrelia burgdorferi
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wypdcr45cfmq16d/Persistence3.docx?dl=0

This “cherry picking” of the Klempner Antibiotic Trials by our Public Health Officials and Infectious Diseases Society of America has got to stop because all other evidence is pointing to an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug which would put Lyme in a different class of infection altogether, one requiring an immediate response similar to a Manhattan Project.

Since there is a 6-year time limitation [1] for occurrences of research misconduct to be brought to the attention of an institution or the Department of Health and Human Services, I’m not claiming misconduct here. I’m asking for your assistance as Associate Inspector General for Scientific Integrity as to what can be done to rectify the divergence between what Klempner has reported vs all the other equally important evidence.

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Respectfully submitted,

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Reference

[1] Requirements for Making a Finding of Research Misconduct
https://grants.nih.gov/policy/research_integrity/requirements.htm
___________________________________________

2018 letter addressed to Dr. Mark Klempner (There was no response)

From: Carl Tuttle <runagain@comcast.net>
To: mark.klempner@umassmed.edu
Cc: michael.collins@umassmed.edu, ddutko@hanszenlaporte.com, ryan.kantor@usdoj.gov, michelle.seltzer@usdoj.gov, william.rinner@usdoj.gov, makan.delrahim@usdoj.gov, tickbornedisease@hhs.gov, Elias, John, officeofthechancellor@umassmed.edu
Date: 04/27/2018 7:53 AM
Subject: Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease

April 27, 2018

University of Massachusetts Medical School
55 Lake Avenue North
Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
Attn: Mark S. Klempner, MD, Executive Vice Chancellor, MassBiologics

Dr. Klempner,

I would like to call attention to the attached study recently identifying chronic Lyme disease in twelve patients from Canada.

Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease
http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/33

All of these patients were culture positive for infection (genital secretions, skin “Morgellons” and blood) even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics.

In contrast, your 2001 antibiotic treatment study found; “no evidence of B. burgdorferi in a total of more than 700 different blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples from the 129 patients in these studies.”

Two Controlled Trials of Antibiotic Treatment in Patients with Persistent Symptoms and a History of Lyme Disease
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200107123450202#article_references#t=references

Not a single positive Dr. Klempner? Doesn’t this statistically prove that your methodology was fatally flawed?

Did you culture skin and genital secretions as the Middelveen paper reports? It would appear that you conveniently stopped looking after your results supported the existing thirty year dogma; chronic Lyme does not exist.

Persistent Lyme disease is not new and has been intentionally/deceitfully suppressed for decades as described in the Vicki Logan case identified in the following letter to past CDC Director Barbara Fitzgerald:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xaul84dqmqgbre0/Brenda%20Fitzgerald%20MD%20Director%20CDC.docx?dl=0

In 1991 B. burgdorferi had been isolated in culture from Vicki Logan’s CSF (CDC’s laboratory in Fort Collins CO.) despite prior treatment with 21 days of IV cefotaxime and 4 months of oral minocycline.

The dishonest science here in the U.S. has denied chronic Lyme which stifled research to find a curative approach. Now the rest of the world is suffering. 

We have lost nearly four decades to this 21st century plague due to the racketeering scheme identified in the RICO lawsuit filed by SHRADER & ASSOCIATES, LLP against the Infectious Disease Society of America, seven IDSA Panelists and eight insurance companies. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has aligned itself with the seven IDSA Panelists identified in this lawsuit.

Court Document:
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/LymeDisease.pdf

Lyme is an incurable disease when not treated immediately which is spreading across North America and deceitfully misclassified as a low-risk and non-urgent health issue. Patient experience is describing a disease that is destroying lives, ending careers, causing death and disability while leaving victims in financial ruin. Current antimicrobials are ineffective for eradicating all forms of the Borrelia spirochete.

Public outcry has been ignored for decades while the Centers for Disease Control sat on evidence that this infection was not easily treated with a one size fits all treatment approach as dictated by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Once again your studies were fatally flawed while supporting the controlling dogma leaving hundreds of thousands if not millions worldwide with a persistent infection and absolutely no relief. We have another AIDS on our hands.

Carl Tuttle

Independent Researcher

Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

Cc: -Michael F. Collins, Chancellor

-The Tick Borne Disease Working Group

-US Department of Justice

-Daniel R. Dutko, HANSZEN LAPORTE

________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Treatment

Leaked EMA Documents Confirms Why We Aren’t Allowed to Analyze “Vaccine” Vials

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/documents-leaked-from-the-ema-confirms?  Video Here (Approx. 14 Min)

Documents leaked from the EMA confirms why we aren’t allowed to analyze the vaccine vials

It’s like rolling the dice for what you get in your vial. Both the FDA and EMA knew this but kept this out of the public view because if it were known, nobody would take the vaccines.

Steve Kirsch

One of my readers has been trying to get my attention for 8 months on the EMA data leak that happened nearly 2 years ago.

He recently posted this substack article documenting his attempts to get visibility on what the EMA document leak revealed.

The gem in the article is this video which was posted 18 months ago that few people have seen. The video is just 14 minutes long and is very well done. The findings are all consistent with what I and others have long suspected: the vials are all different.

The key finding is the reason they won’t let anyone analyze the vials: mRNA is not intact. The BMJ wrote about this on March 10, 2021 [my comments are in brackets]:

  1. On Nov 23, 2020, EMA knew about the quality control issues with severely compromised mRNA integrity (ranging from 78% to 55%). [It’s supposed to be 100% if you want an effective vaccine.]
  2. Just two days later, a source in the US said the lots were now “back at around 70-75%, which leaves us cautiously optimistic that additional data could address the issue.”
  3. “The complete, intact mRNA molecule is essential to its potency as a vaccine,” professor of biopharmaceutics Daan J.A. Crommelin and colleagues wrote in a review article in The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences late last year.”
  4. The BMJ asked Pfizer, Moderna, and CureVac, as well as several regulators, what percentage mRNA integrity they consider acceptable for vaccines against covid-19. None offered any specifics. [“Wow, that’s really comforting. <sarcasm off>”]
  5. The EMA told The BMJ that the levels of truncated mRNA “and the amounts of a potential protein produced by the truncated mRNA would be too low to constitute a safety risk.” [uh… how does the EMA know that exactly?]
  6. Health Canada told The BMJ that Pfizer had conducted investigations into the root cause of reduced integrity in the commercial vaccine batches, and “changes were made in their processes to ensure that the integrity was improved and brought in line with what was seen for clinical trial batches.” Health Canada said the three agencies subsequently determined that “there was no concern with the RNA integrity or any other product specifications.” [Whew! Now I’m relieved! No data on the new levels produced. If you can’t trust Pfizer, who can you trust?]

In general, the BMJ wasn’t happy about anything they heard from the regulators. They were basically stonewalled in their requests.

The fact that it’s illegal for anyone to analyze the vials (they are government property) doesn’t help inspire confidence at all.

Even if you are getting 100% intact mRNA which would be really rare, you’re still not getting anything that resembles the virus. So the efficacy as far as PROTECTING you will be next to nothing. However, what it will do very effectively, if you got reasonably intact mRNA, is to cause you significant harm. You are playing a game of chance with your immune system and what is in the bottle.

The video highlights some of the things we learned from the EMA data breach:

  1. The EMA claims the documents were manipulated to make them look bad, but won’t say how they were manipulated. I’m not buying the EMA story at all.
  2. The Members of the European Parliament (MEP) weren’t allowed to read the contracts with the vaccine makers (only heavily redacted versions). Again, if you can’t trust Pfizer and the EMA, who can you trust?
  3. The mRNA is unstable, even at the required temperatures because light, movement (like shipping it to a destination), and any temperature variation disrupts it.
  4. Unstable mRNA means the spike protein (which was artificially propped up) could collapse making the whole process useless to support immunity, but still dangerous in terms of damage to cells. So you get all the risk and no benefit.
  5. The mRNA integrity was better in the clinical trial than commercial batches. But don’t assume that the vaccine worked in the trials since the trials were heavily gamed to produce favorable outcomes, mostly by excluding people with weak immune systems from the vaccine group (this is why there were 5X the number of exclusions in the vax group). So you’re looking at a vaccine which likely does absolutely nothing except make people believe they are protected. This mind control works quite well. People bought the story for over a year before they realized they were getting infected at the same rate as people who didn’t get the vaccine.
  6. The mRNA integrity varied between countries.
  7. Pfizer never told anyone that the commercial vaccines had lower mRNA integrity than the vaccines used in the trials. This is unethical, bordering on fraud.
  8. The EMA tried to cover it up. Instead of protecting the public and making Pfizer look bad, the EMA basically covered up the problem.
  9. Pfizer never told the public or governments about the risks associated with mRNA integrity. If it wasn’t for the leak, we’d never have known. But it’s all OK because the drug companies are exempt from any liability. The patient takes all the risk here, not the drug companies.
  10. EMA was concerned about visible particles in the vials. The BMJ never investigated that. Is it still a problem? I don’t think anyone cares to know the answer to that.
  11. The deaths in the trials are all dismissed as “unrelated to the vaccine” without doing the proper analysis.
  12. There should be an investigation into these issues, but the governments are not going to expose their own fraud since it would be too embarrassing so nothing will happen.

Summary

  • This video summarizing the leaked EMA documents constitutes yet more evidence that the vaccines confer no benefits, only risk.
  • However, like everything else, it will be ignored by the authorities.
  • However, this is important information for the public to know about how they are being manipulated into taking a useless vaccine.
  • NOBODY is calling for any quality control here.
  • Have you ever seen a study where the authors collect vials randomly and sequence them? It’s not going to happen. Not in my lifetime.

____________________

**Comment**

Researchers HAVE studied the ingredients within the vials as well as the blood of the “vaxxed” and have found frightening things:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

Moderna Sues Pfizer, BioNTech Over COVID “Vaccines”

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/moderna-sues-pfizer-biontech-over-covid-19-vaccines

Moderna Sues Pfizer, BioNTech Over COVID Vaccines

by Tyler Durden
Friday, Aug 26, 2022
Moderna announced on Friday that it’s suing rivals Pfizer and BioNTech SE, claiming that the mRNA technology in their Covid-19 jab infringes on its patents.

The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court in Massachusetts as well as in Germany, seeks unspecified monetary damages for patent infringement, and sets the stage for a massive legal battle between the three vaccine makers.

In a Friday statement, the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Moderna accused partners Pfizer and BioNTech of violating key mRNA patents in the development of the Comirnaty vaccine. The company says it had patents from 2010 to 2016 on mRNA technology which made its Spikevax jab possible, which the other two companies copied without permission.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

Evil always eats its own eventually.

The COVID debacle is and always has been about money and power.  It’s never been about health.  The lies and tales were spun from the very beginning, have continued to spin, and are now spinning out of control. 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Tickease Founder On Dangers of Ticks, What We Need to Know About Prevention

https://www.wideopenspaces.com/tickease-founder-on-ticks/

TickEase Founder Dan Wolff on Dangers of Ticks, What We Need to Know About Prevention

By |
 

Dan Wolff, aka: “Tick Man Dan,” wore a tie emblazoned with images of ticks to his wedding. He regularly wears shirts and even a wristwatch with pictures of the arachnids on them. He has two tattoos of the creepy, blood-sucking pests permanently inked onto his left leg. He even goes on tick hunting expeditions, and he keeps jars of them around his home. This may strike some people as weird, but for Wolff, they’re conversation starters on a subject he’s passionate about. Plus, it’s part of how he makes his living. Tick Man Dan’s mission is simple: to educate the public on the dangers posed from the diseases and parasites carried by ticks, and to promote his brand, TickEase. The company makes a set of specialty tweezers designed by Wolff himself that are meant specifically for the removal of ticks and their nymphs once embedded in a person.

When I spoke to Wolff via Zoom from his home in Massachusetts, I learned more about ticks in one 40-minute sitting than I had learned my whole life. We spoke about TickEase and their Tick-Kits, proactively preventing issues, and his general enthusiasm for these tiny creatures that are capable of causing such big problems.  (See link for article)

___________________

SUMMARY:

  • Out of necessity, Wolff created Tickease when he couldn’t find a good tick removal device – particularly for an embedded nymph (which is as small as a poppy seed).
  • Unfortunately Wolff regurgitates the “warmer weather gets more ticks” mantra – essentially propelling the ‘climate change’ myth regarding tick and disease proliferation. 
    • Ticks are marvelously ecoadaptive and can survive virtually all weather by burrowing under leaf litter and snow – and anything else they can find. 
    • The repeated mantra of “climate change”, wildlife proliferation, and surburban sprawl ignores the very real spreading of ticks by our own government who has experimented on ticks for decades.
    • Willy Burgdorfer, the “discoverer” of Lyme disease was a researcher at the Rocky Mountain laboratory where he weaponized ticks by force-feeding them numerous pathogens.
  • Ticks can be active year-round – proving their ecoadaptability.  They can go into a dormant state called diapause due to a anti-freeze-like substance in their bodies which actually feeds the Lyme bacteria.
  • Wolff found ticks can wake up fast with a feeding frenzy if there are periods of cold interrupted by a sudden increase in temps. Please watch this short video demonstrating how quickly this can happen.
  • Wolff dispels the myth that it takes 36 hours for ticks to transmit Lyme.  (It can happen in a few of mere hours)
  • He also points out that viruses can be transmitted in minutes and that ticks carry far more than just Lyme.
  • When removing a tick, do not agitate it or get the contents of the abdomen on you.

For more:

 

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Prevention, Ticks, Transmission

Strategies to Prevent Lyme & Tick Borne Infections

https://www.treatlyme.net/guide/how-to-prevent-tick-bites-and-lyme-disease  Video Here  (Approx. 3 Min)

Strategies to Prevent Lyme & Tick Borne Infections

Lyme disease and tick borne infections are spread through tick bites. The best way to prevent Lyme disease and related infections is to stop ticks from attaching to you. Another strategy is to quickly remove attached ticks before they spread infection. Here are some specific actions you can take to prevent Lyme and related infections.

Actions While Outdoors Where Ticks Live

ONE – Use A Good Tick Repellent On Your Skin

Before going into tick habitats, spray your skin with a tick repellent. Ticks are repelled by certain chemicals which limit their chances of getting on your skin or biting you. Common repellants include

  • picaridin,
  • DEET, and
  • essential oils.

Of these, picaridin and DEET work best because they last longer.

Research shows essential oils only work up to 20 minutes after application. Picaridin 20% can last 12 to 14 hours depending on whether a spray or lotion is used. The length of effect of DEET depends on the concentration. DEET 30% can last for 8 hours – while DEET 98% in Backwoods OFF can last for 10 hours.

DEET vs Picaridin

I prefer Picaridin vs DEET. Both are equally effective and recommended by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). But DEET leaves an oily layer on the skin and has potential neurotoxic effects that stop me from recommending this for people living with Lyme or who have had Lyme in the past. To be fair, the chances of neurotoxicity occurring from DEET are extremely small. However, I do not think a very small risk is worth it given how well picaridin works without any health risk.

You can use the EPA search tool to find approved tick repellents. Another option is to use an odorless picaridin 20% cream or spray product I carry at Marty Ross MD Supplements made by Proven Tick Repellent.

TWO – Spray Your Clothing with Permethrin

One other strategy is to spray your clothing, tent or camping equipment with permethrin and let it dry. Once dry, permethrin will remain effective for 6 weeks or 6 washes. Permethrin works on ticks two ways. First it is an irritant to ticks, once on permethrin coated fabric, ticks get “hot feet” and jump off. But if ticks remain on the fabric too long, the permethrin will actually kill them.

THREE – Wear Light Colored Clothing Covering Your Skin

Clothing provides a barrier to keep ticks from finding skin to bite. A strategy that can help includes wearing long pants tucked into your socks, shirts tucked in at your waist, and long sleeves. If you wear white or light colored clothing it may make it easier to spot ticks on your clothing – so you can brush them off before they reach bare skin.

FOUR – Perform Regular Tick Checks

While you are outdoors, perform regular cursory tick checks of your skin and clothing. If you find a tick, brush it off before it can bite you.

Actions Right After Coming Indoors

Once you are inside take actions to remove any ticks that might be on your clothing or attached to your body. You could remove your clothes and place them in a hot drier. The drier can blow any attached ticks off and the heat can kill them. With your clothes off, you will have an easier time seeing any ticks on your skin. Some suggest taking a shower. The idea behind this action is while naked showering, you will have an easier time seeing the ticks. The shower water itself does not kill a tick. There is also a potential that showering can dislodge ticks from your skin.

Safely Remove An Attached Tick

If you find a tick attacked, remove it safely. The best way to remove a tick is to grab the tick at the head using tweezers. Pull up slowly and carefully. This method limits the chances that an attached tick will vomit Lyme and related germs into the tick bite area. Other methods, like burning a tick off, increase the chances of germ transmission from an infected tick.

Decrease Ticks on Your Property

You can work to limit infected ticks on your property. One strategy is to place cotton or wool treated with permethrin in toilet paper cardboard tubes throughout your property. Rodents and varmints that carry ticks will pick up the cotton or wool and bring it back to their beds. Ticks exposed to the permethrin soaked cotton or wool will die.

Disclaimer

The ideas and recommendations on this website and in this article are for informational purposes only. For more information about this, see the sitewide Terms & Conditions.

_________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Prevention, Ticks