NEW DETAILS IN COVID TESTING SCANDAL
Del Bigtree and Jeffery Jaxen
New details have emerged about the test used for #COVID19, highlighting serious inaccuracies in results and past comments by the tests’ creator doubting the accuracy of PCR testing.
German virologist Christian Drosten’s guidelines on detection of the novel coronavirus for the PCR tests was accepted after only 24 hours of surveillance before becoming the standard. His paper is now being contested and peer reviewed for the first time allowing for some shocking discoveries of error that would potentially render the PCR test completely useless.
Please watch entire video in link above.
I’ve posted on the inaccuracy of COVID testing many times and that it’s essentially meaningless, yet is being used for world-wide tyranny. Many have gone so far as to state that COVID-19 is a ‘casedemic.’
I posted on the current demand for the retraction of the Corman-Drosten foundation paper, which has been challenged by 22 international scientists here: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/07/ten-fatal-errors-scientists-attack-paper-that-establish-global-pcr-driven-lockdown/
The Highwire video highlights a review report of the Corman/Drosten paper which states they have:
“identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test USELESS.“
Jaxen then presents an old 2014 interview with Drosten stating the PCR is an unsuitable test when MERS cases surfaced. He also stated that the test is so sensitive it can detect a single genetic molecule of the virus – which means even healthy people (uninfected) will be diagnosed with the virus. Drosten also criticized the media for creating the ‘pandemic,’ by boiling the matter up. So just 6 years ago Drosten had a completely different tune and did a 180 degree about-face with COVID-19.
While this is crucial information, the CRUX or foundation for this abysmal testing is the lack of a viral isolate from which to base everything upon. This is discussed in the “Ten Fatal Errors” link above and is clearly explained in the book “Virus Mania, How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits at Our Expense”. David Crowe also writes about it here:
Again, many will point to the plethora of articles claiming viral isolation, but when you drill down you find they took impure material, called it ‘virus’, added it to cell culture and observed cell death. Sometimes authors call this “virus-like” particles such as here: https://www.thelancet.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673620311855 and sometimes they boldly state viral isolation such as when they took material from patients with unexplained pneumonia, intermittent cough and fever such as here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/
But what none have done so far is PURIFED a singular virus from all else. To researchers, isolation can mean whatever they want it to mean, but purification is an entirely different matter.
The history of not purifying viruses is somewhat similar to the sordid history of Lyme/MSIDS and is presented in this wonderful interview with Kary Mullis, the creator of the PCR: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/
In this article you learn that the PCR:
played a central role in the HIV war (a war you don’t know about, that lasted 22 years, between Globalist post-modern HIV scientists and classical scientists.) The latter lost the war. Unless you count being correct as winning. The relentless violence finally silenced the opposition, and it seemed nobody would ever learn who these scientists were, or why they fought this thing so adamantly and passionately.
Mullis, like his friend and colleague Dr. Peter Duesberg, does not believe that AIDS is caused by the retrovirus HIV. He is a long-standing member of the Group for the Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis, the 500-member protest organization pushing for a re-examination of the cause of AIDS.
“Every time somebody takes a swab, a tissue sample of their DNA, it goes into a government database. It’s to track us,” says David Rasnick. “They’re not just looking for the virus. Please put that in your article.”
But the real clincher is that HIV was NEVER “separated from everything else.” According to Mullis it is a “laboratory artifact, a set of lab-tortured antigens around which a ‘test’ was built.”
Purification of an actual virus, which used to be the “gold standard”is no longer done.
HIV co-discoverer and Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier famously told journalist Djamel Tahi in an interview: “I repeat, we did not purify.” Please see this excellent commentary on Montagnier’s claims by Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al.
Nothing was proven before it was asserted. This became the norm, paving the way for the situation we are in now. Global viral communism.
Also, please see this video where in the first minute, Dr. Kaufman states that COVID-19 has not been purified, and that therefore no target for a vaccine exists: https://www.bitchute.com/video/TlxWZHk5yhFM/ The COVID Vaccine – Ask the Experts
Lastly, COVID-19 wouldn’t even be classified as a ‘pandemic’ unless the WHO changed the definition:
I found this highly interesting consider the above information. Australian Vaccine Abandoned After False HIV Response: www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-55269381
And this: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/21/redfield-birx-can-they-be-trusted-with-covid/ In 1992, two military investigators charged Redfield and Birx with engaging in “a systematic pattern of data manipulation, inappropriate statistical analyses and misleading data presentation in an apparent attempt to promote the usefulness of the GP160 AIDS vaccine.”