Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Neurologist Weighs in on Spate of SADS: “We Should Be Doing Autopsies on Every Single One”

https://jennifermargulis.substack.com/p/we-should-be-doing-autopsies-on-every

“We Should be Doing Autopsies on Every Single One”

A neurologist weighs in on the spate of sudden adult deaths

Jennifer Margulis

Robert Lowry, M.D., is a concussion and musculoskeletal expert who has been practicing medicine for over 25 years. When I spoke with him by phone last week, Lowry told me he’s seen an upsurge in young patients—adults under 40—coming to him with neurological problems.

These problems, he said, include everything from severe headaches to Bell’s palsy (facial paralysis) to strokes.

In every case he has seen, Lowry said, his patient was vaccinated. For this reason, he believes these neurological issues are actually COVID-19 vaccine adverse events.

Data From Mexico

Lowry pointed me to a 2021 article in Clinical Immunology that analyzed vaccine injury data from Mexico.

The study authors found that about 1 percent of people who got the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine reported having adverse neurological events afterwards.

Less than one percent. No problem. Right?

But, Lowry argued, that number is likely underreported by a factor of 10. And, he insisted, even if it is accurate, that percentage of adverse neurological events is simply too high to justify vaccination in otherwise healthy young adults.

(See link for article)

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • If 2/3 of the population got one dose, that is 5.3 billion people.  1% of 5.3 billion equals 53 MILLION who have likely already suffered from neurological injury.
  • You can calculate your risk of dying from COVID-19 by entering your age, place of residence, and underlying health issues into an online risk calculator.
  • Since the risk of dying from COVID for young adults is less than 1%, risk of injection damage outweighs any supposed benefit.
  • Healthy people are suddenly dying (SADS) in numbers never seen before.
  • When the deaths are “unexplained” but a history of vaccination within the past 12 months, Dr. Lowry believes the cause is likely the mRNA vaccines.
  • Physicians are seeing many more severe reactions and neurological and cardiac injuries after the second dose.
  • The most likely ways include micro-clots in the brain that result in neuron necrosis; myocarditis, pericarditis and other heart damage; and vasculitis (inflammation of the blood vessels), but is compounded by immuno-sensitivity.
  • The best way to find out the cause of these cases is by doing autopsies, and Lowry believes autopsies should be done on every single one of these healthy people who died suddenly.

Please note that Fauci told the government to tell others to NOT do autopsies on COVID patients.  Doctors are asking where the autopsies are of those who died after the COVID shots. Embalmers are showing blood clots and white, fibrous structures in the “vaxxed,” and that hospitals are covering up the deaths of babies by cremating them in house.

Autopsies would also give answers in Lyme-land.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Hospitals Covering Up Baby Deaths By Cremating Them – Funeral Home Whistleblower

https://rumble.com/v1c8w03-john-olooney-hospitals-are-covering-up-baby-deaths-by-cremating-babies-them.html  Video Here  (Approx. 50 Min)

Hospitals Covering Up Baby Deaths by Cremating Babies Themselves

July 14, 2022

John O’Looney is a brave Funeral Home whistleblower who has been raising the alarm since early on in the pandemic.

He joined us to discuss the findings from this embalmer which are in line with what Dr. Jane Ruby, Richard Hirschman and others have found – long, fibrous strands inside people who have been injected.

During our interview, John revealed shocking information regarding hospitals covering up baby deaths by cremating the babies themselves.

If you would like to support Zeee Media to continue getting the truth out to more people, you can donate via this link:  https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=WUUFGLFXH45R6

You may be unaware, but FEMA helps pay funeral costs for COVID-related deaths.  I actually knew of a man who died, and the family was told if they labeled it a “COVID death” funeral expenses would be paid.  It didn’t matter if he died of COVID or not – it became a matter of money, just like in hospitals and the use of the diabolical CARES Act which is being used to hand-cuff doctors from treating COVID with effective treatments.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Antibodies From Vaccines Interfering Instead of Neutralizing Because of Spike Protein Changes: Dr. Risch

https://www.theepochtimes.com/antibodies-from-vaccines-interfering-instead-of-neutralizing-because-of-spike-protein-changes-dr-risch

Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, in New York on July 7, 2022. (Bao Qiu/The Epoch Times)
Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, in New York on July 7, 2022. (Bao Qiu/The Epoch Times)

Antibodies From Vaccines Interfering Instead of Neutralizing Because of Spike Protein Changes: Dr. Risch

By Zachary Stieber and Jan Jekielek
July 20, 2022

The antibodies triggered by COVID-19 vaccines are interfering with people’s immune systems as newer virus variants emerge, Dr. Harvey Risch said.

The two most widely-used vaccines in the United States, produced by Pfizer and Moderna, both work by sending messenger RNA into muscle cells, where they produce a piece of the spike protein from the virus that causes COVID-19. The spike protein triggers the production of antibodies, which are believed to help prevent infection by SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, and fight illness if one still gets infected.

But the vaccines are based on the spike protein from the original virus variant, which was displaced early in the pandemic. Since then, a series of newer strains have become dominant around the world, with the latest being BA.5.

(See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • Risch points out what many experts have stated from the get-go: the mRNA gene-therapy injections, which aren’t vaccines, only create a narrow range of antibodies. 
  • Recovery from infection (natural immunity) is always far superior to “vaccines”.
  • Instead of neutralizing antibodies, the “vaccines” create interfering antibodies and are providing negative benefit in 4-8 months after the last dose.
  • Recent studies have indicated that people who were “vaccinated” are more likely to get infected with COVID-19, including Pfizer’s clinical trial in young children (pdf).  Real-world data also show higher rates of infection among the “vaccinated”.
  • Data from the UK showed people who had received both a primary vaccination series and a booster as having three times the rate of symptomatic infection as unvaccinated people.
Yet, research continues to push the gene therapy injections based on faulty research and erroneous modeling.
Fauci and Biden, both fully “vaxxed” and boosted, have tested positive and contracted COVID despite the injections.

Biden just like Fauci, will be taking the accepted narrative treatment, Paxlovid, which has been proven to cause a “rebound effect”.   But heaven-forbid they take either HCQ/zinc, or ivermectin – both of which are cheap, effective, and safe treatments for COVID but have been censored and banned despite decades of safety.

Fauci got major epidemiology and public health questions wrong. Reality and scientific studies have now caught up with him and predictably he says he will step down from his current position before the end of Biden’s term, but is far from making an official announcement.

Category:

vaccines, Viruses

Another Erroneous Model: Grossly Inflates Estimates of Lives Saved by COVID Shots But Will Be Used As Gospel

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/07/model-misspecification-and-grossly-inflated-estimates-of-lives-saved/

Model Misspecification and Grossly Inflated Estimates of Lives Saved

by Spiro Pantazatos | Guest Writer
Published July 18, 2022 | Opinion

Model Misspecification and Grossly Inflated Estimates of Lives Saved

In a recent study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Watson et al. apply mathematical modeling to estimate that mass COVID-19 vaccinations saved between 14-20 million lives worldwide during the first year of the COVID-19 vaccination program. Previous Brownstone [Institute] articles by Horst and Raman have already pointed out several erroneous assumptions in the study regarding infection- vs. vaccine-derived immunity duration as well as the fact it did not account for vaccine adverse events and all-cause mortality risk.

Here, I summarize the mechanics of how the authors arrived at their estimates of deaths averted due to mass vaccinations. I then elaborate on how flawed assumptions in the model can lead to grossly inflated estimates of averted deaths, which may explain the study’s lack of face validity and internal consistency.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Please remember how another erroneous model set this crazy-train in motion that grossly overestimated lives lost due to COVID. Ferguson’s “provably faulty information has arguably done more to move us into the era of medical martial law than any other single piece of misinformation. He was also the man behind a number of similarly over-the-top mortality projections in previous public health scares, including wildly faulty death forecasts for the 2005 bird flu scare and the 2009 swine flu scamdemic test run. So how does someone who consistently gets it so wrong get entrusted with constructing yet another faulty model for yet another public health scare? Hint: The Gates Foundation has 79 million reasons why. He was eventually tangled up in his own lies when he was caught cavorting with his mistress in direct contravention of the anti-social distancing rules that he so forcefully advocates for the peasants, but for some reason, despite making a big show of resigning in apparent disgrace for his actions, he is still advising the UK government on their scamdemic response.” Source

Seems the band plays on.

The conclusion in the opinion pieces states the faulty paper should not be used to inform public policy and guidelines, and that quantitative risk-benefit ratio analyses that use clinical trial or real-world data to compare risks of specific outcomes, such as all-cause mortality or myopericarditis following “vaccination” and coronavirus infection, are much more useful.

I’ll go one further.

This defunct, misleading article needs to be completely retracted.
Because you and I both know that it will be used ad nauseum to push dangerous gene-therapy injections on one and all, based on yet more faulty information that will be taken as gospel.

While the author posts a version of this article with figures and bibliography on ResearchGate, and tweeted the commentary to the original authors of the study in hopes for a response and rebuttal, he also submitted a shortened version to The Lancet Infectious Diseases and is awaiting their reply.

Don’t hold your breath.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

The Data Are In : Objective Scientists Were Right All Along

**UPDATE Aug. 2022**

Weiler just posted part two here.  In it, he shares Dr. Peter McCullough’s 2-hour presentation slides detailing how the COVID shots have failed.

Here’s part 1:

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-data-are-in-objective-scientists?

The Data Are In: Objective Scientists Were Right All Along

At the Michigan Health Summit, Dr. Peter McCollough presented for two hours straight and came to the correct conclusion: The vaccines have failed.

James Lyons-Weiler
July 20, 2022

ACTION ITEM: SHARING IS CARING. THE BEST THING YOU CAN DO IS SHARE THIS ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND TAG PHYSICIANS. SECOND BEST? GIVE THEM A GIFT SUBSCRIPTION, BELOW.

Most people do not know what negative vaccine efficacy is. Nor do they know the difference between vaccine efficacy and vaccine effectiveness. We’re changing that by teaching the world the Math of Vaccine Science this fall.

Measures like these require data. And Dr. Peter McCullough reviewed data for two hours in Grand Rapids, Michigan this weekend to a crowd of doctors and lay people. He sent me his slides. I’m presenting these slides to you without commentary – but with links to each resource he cites so you can share this Substack article with physicians and scientists who are beginning to scratch their heads. They are vaccinated, so why are they getting COVID? They are beginning to ask themselves: Why are such a high percentage of people who get serious COVID-19 vaccinated, when the promise was that the vaccine would prevent this? And why, if the vaccine is such a success, have only 21% of Americans taken their first booster? In that setting, why is Fauci proposing a “second” booster … and boosters likely every few months?

Popular Rationalism is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

I thank Dr. McCullough for sharing his slides with all of us. You can download the slidedeck here. To access the resource cited on each slide, click the image. Be sure to note the specific data Dr. McCullough highlighted, when he has.

Feel free to download these images and share them on social media with the cited link. Please also link to the United Healthcare Summit video here:

https://rumble.com/v1cf67t-united-healthcare-summit-saturday.html

This was a CME-qualified event. Contact info@ipak-edu.org subject line “CME Credits” and we will forward your email to the CME-providing institution.

(7/20/2022: This is the first 100 slides. There are 86 or so more to go. I’ll update the article and republish soon when it’s complete).

Please go to top link for slides.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses