Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

America’s Recipe for Systemic Disintegration

https://www.globalresearch.ca/america-recipe-systemic-disintegration/5791227

America’s Recipe for Systemic Disintegration

By Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null
Global Research, August 25, 2022

More than ever before in American history people are no longer able to trust their leaders in government, industry and the media. Rather than put our confidence in official positions of power and influence, there is a better way to concentrate our focus. That is, we should allow history, independent science and substantiated facts to be our arbiters.

For example, at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020, it was understandable that we lacked sufficient, objective information to make informed judgments and decisions. All of the data about the new coronavirus strain and its spread was derived and disseminated from official sources. Therefore, we had to rely upon the reputation of the professional institutions and the believability of so-called experts to guide us.

Without being political, partisan or biased, we can now review the official narrative and determine what was true, false and remains unproven. We were told there were enormous numbers of deaths among the elderly to justify emergency measures to rapidly develop novel drugs and new vaccines. However, the evidence shows the opposite. The vast majority of deaths in hospitals, critical care centers and nursing homes were people who died from pre-existing comorbidities that may have been complicated by SARS-2 infection. In addition, the earlier accepted course of treatment – quarantine and oxygen therapy – was shown to be largely ineffective and, in fact, further complicated rising mortality rates.

Moreover, if a patient in hospice care with terminal cancer or COPD became infected, the death would have been ruled Covid-19.  This manipulation of cause-of-death certificates presented an image that the virus was far more lethal than it actually was. Only about 7 percent of reported Covid deaths can actually be associated with the virus as the primary cause.

Many medical professionals have reported that the PCR diagnostic test used throughout the world was remarkably flawed with very high rates of false positives. it has been known for a couple decades that PCR is an unreliable diagnostic tool for infectious diseases. Had we not relied on PCR, the case rate would never have warranted such a hysteric reaction. In the absence of novel drugs targeting the SARS-2 virus specifically nor a vaccine, health officials held firm to the story that there was no effective treatment. Infected people should return home and quarantine themselves until their condition worsens. The reality is that there were multiple highly effective drugs and therapeutic protocols that could have been prescribed but weren’t. As a result, hundreds of thousands of lives were lost unnecessarily. Worst, this may have been the first time in American medicine when large numbers of orthodox physicians and medical experts, the large majority who are pro-vaccine, were attacked, ridiculed and cancelled for suggesting early treatment with FDA approved off-label drugs such as hydroxychoroquine and ivermectin. Any doctor who spoke out was fair game.

Locking down entire cities and quarantining large numbers of presumably infected people did nothing to stop the pandemic. Such brash measures miscalculated the long-term consequences. Throughout the pandemic depression and anxiety, suicides, alcohol consumption and drug overdoses reached record highs.

In addition, all of the propaganda about the Covid vaccines being safe and effective was indisputably erroneous. Clearly when the major institutions that create and execute national health policies are repeatedly wrong and misguided, the public quickly loses trust. These public health debacles, as well as other issues, cost taxpayers enormous sums. The latest is a $40 billion aid package to dump into the Ukrainian government’s losing war with Russia. It is unfathomable that supporting a nation militarily and economically, which has been ranked as the most corrupt in Europe, would take precedence over the severe crises in the domestic economy. Congress’ aid package becomes all the more ludicrous and egregious when we take into account the US’s increasing inflation, skyrocketing energy costs and widespread shortages in infant formula.  (See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • Those in power are the structural problem behind this catastrophe
  • About 75% of restaurants and bars closed during the pandemic will never reopen again.
  • The sole, fear filled, daily message given to the public was to get tested, and get the “vaccine” despite the glaring flaws of both.
  • A complicit media continually gives the official COVID narrative.
  • Educated people are supporting irrational beliefs.
  • Nothing is being done about the following:
    • 66 million Americans are now food insecure
    • 2 million don’t have clean drinking water
    • 4 in 10 Americans, 132 million, are financially broke
    • Obesity is the health risk most associated with Covid deaths; 40% of American adults, 20 years and over, are clinically obese and another 72% are overweight
    • Our federal health agencies remain in the grip of the junk food industry’s lobbying
    • 44 million Americans are uninsured and an additional 38 million have inadequate health insurance
    • 43 million American adults (21%) are illiterate
    • US total debt is now $91 trillion

Please read The Spartacus Letter, written anonymously due to fear of retribution, which delineates point by point the utter farce and mishandling of COVID.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Army Whistleblower: DOD, FDA, Violate Federal Code & Falsify Vaccine Injury Records

https://rumble.com/v1lbl6l-army-ltcol-theresa-long-md-full-testimony.html  Video Here (Approx. 32 min)

Army LtCol Theresa Long MD – Full Testimony 09/17/22

Exclusive testimony of Army Whistleblower LtCol Theresa Long MD (flight surgeon). Her testimony shows how the DOD, FDA and many other organizations are violating federal code and how the jabs are causing vaccine injuries to fighter pilots as well as their medical records are being falsified to cover up jab injuries. Injuries from brain tumors, cancer, and deadly heart conditions she shows how the jabs are injuring and grounding many young military pilots. Find out the dangers they are facing.

LtCol Theresa Long MD gave her “Whistleblower” testimony to the Alaska Medical Freedom Symposium in Palmer, Alaska. Hundreds were in in attendance with many more watching live online across the state and throughout the U.S and Canada.

Army LtCol Theresa Long MD give her heartfelt testimony just days after the passing of her Father.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

FDA Refuses to Release Autopsy Results on People Who Died After COVID Vaccines & ICAN Obtains CDC V-SAFE Data

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-autopsy-results-covid-vaccine-deaths-

FDA Refuses to Release Autopsy Results on People Who Died After COVID Vaccines

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said it’s barred from releasing the results of autopsies conducted on people who died after getting COVID-19 vaccines, but a drug safety advocate said the agency could release the autopsies with personal information redacted.
fda autopsy results covid vaccines feature

By Zachary Stieber

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is refusing to release the results of autopsies conducted on people who died after getting COVID-19 vaccines.

The FDA says it is barred from releasing medical files, but a drug safety advocate says that it could release the autopsies with personal information redacted.

The refusal was issued to The Epoch Times, which submitted a Freedom of Information Act for all autopsy reported obtained by the FDA concerning any deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccination.

Reports are lodged with the system when a person experiences an adverse event, or a health issue, after receiving a vaccine.

The FDA and other agencies are tasked with investigating the reports. Authorities request and review medical records to vet the reports, including autopsies.

The FDA declined to release any reports, even redacted copies.

The FDA cited federal law, which enables agencies to withhold information if the agency “reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption,” with the exemption being “personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”

Federal regulations also bar the release of “personnel, medical and similar files the disclosure of which constitutes a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”

The Epoch Times has appealed the denial, in addition to the recent denial of results of data analysis of VAERS reports.

‘Easily be redacted’

Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who advises the FDA as part of the Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, said that the reports could be released with personal information blacked out.

“The personal information could easily be redacted without losing the potential learnings from [the] autopsy,” Witczak told The Epoch Times via email.

People make the choice to submit autopsy results to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, Witczak noted.

“If someone submits their experience to VAERS they want and expect to have it investigated by the FDA. This includes autopsy reports,” she said.

Autopsies are examinations of deceased persons performed to determine the cause of death.

“Autopsies can be an important part of postmortem analysis and should be done especially with increased deaths following COVID-19 vaccination,” Witczak said.

FDA responds

An FDA spokesperson noted that deaths following COVID-19 vaccination are rare, citing the number of reports made to VAERS.

As of Sept. 14, 16,516 reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. Approximately 616 million doses have been administered in the U.S. through September.

The spokesperson declined to say whether the FDA would ever release the autopsy results but pointed to a paper authored by researchers with the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The paper, which has not been peer-reviewed, analyzed the approximately 9,800 reports of death to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccination lodged from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 17, 2021.

Researchers found that reporting rates were lower than the expected all-cause mortality rates.

“Trends in reporting rates reflected known trends in background mortality rates. These findings do not suggest an association between vaccination and overall increased mortality,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers noted that prior studies have found that adverse events reported to VAERS are an undercount of the true number of events.

Reprinted with permission from The Epoch Times. 

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

________________

**UPDATE**

Go here to listen to attorney Aaron Siri on the CDC losing a lawsuit and is forced to turn over 144 Million lines of Injection Data – “Vaccine” adverse events.

V-SAFE Covid Vaccine Injury Data – Shows

  • 7.7% Seek Medical Care After “Vaccination”
  • 25% Have Serious Side Effects
  • Out of the 10 million people who used v-safe, 3,353,110 were hurt

And 6,458,751 health impacts were reported by v-safe users.

Options for health impacts were:

  1. unable to work or attend school;
  2. unable to do your normal daily activities; and/or
  3. get care from a doctor or other healthcare professional  Source

https://thehighwire.com/videos/breaking-news-ican-obtains-cdc-v-safe-data/ 2 Minute Video Here

BREAKING NEWS: ICAN OBTAINS CDC V-SAFE DATA

After 2 lawsuits and months of litigation, ICAN’S legal team, headed by Aaron Siri, has obtained over 144 million rows of health entry data from approximately 10 million users of the CDC’s v-safe app. The public is encouraged to review this data by going to ICAN’s new v-safe Dashboard, available at icandecide.org/v-safe.

Please also watch this interview with former ITV & Sky News Exec Mark Sharman  and Del Big Tree on how mainstream journalism is dead due to its marching in lockstep with government and becoming nothing more than a propaganda machine.

This link shows the latest VAERS data and the mounting list of adverse reactions & death reported after the COVID shots:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Study Suggests the COVID shot ‘Caused One in 800 Adverse Events’ & Spinning ‘Vaccine’ Failure into a Win

http://  Approx. 1 Min

Sept. 29, 2022

Dr Joseph Fraiman speaks to Mark Steyn after a report is published suggesting the Covid vaccine ‘caused one in 800 adverse events.’

‘Our public officials aren’t speaking about this. It’s their duty to be speaking about the findings in our study.’ ~ Dr. Fraiman
I highly recommend the documentary “Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion.”
____________________

Vaccine Failure Is Not a Reason to Celebrate!

Reporting on a new study, U.S. News & World Report this week published an article, “‘Breakthrough’ Infections After COVID Vaccine Can Help Prevent Future Illness,” which spins vaccine failure as a reason to celebrate.

Let’s pause and read that again: Breakthrough infections … after COVID-19 vaccine … can help prevent future illness.

If you get the disease the vaccine was supposed to prevent, it can help prevent you from getting the disease the vaccine was supposed to prevent … again.  (See link for article)

Is this supposed to be good news?
_____________________
**Comment**
This only makes sense in the Topsy-turvy world of the new normal.
It is clear that this article was written to placate the burgeoning demographic who got the shot but got infected anyway, and who are left remorsefully scratching their heads.
The author points out the steps to placate a questioning public:
  1. Don’t mention the misleading messaging throughout the pandemic
  2. Don’t mention any of the harm that was done
  3. Offer speculation as fact
  4. Don’t mention the unvaccinated
  5. Don’t mention that once you are “vaccinated” you are forever “vaccinated”. There’s no going back.
Again, just repeat “It’s safe and effective”, even though the CDC is hiding data.
For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

New Study Supports Conclusion of Retracted 2020 Study Showing Unvaxxed Kids Healthier Than Vaxxed & the Vaxxed Had a 36% Higher Risk of Asthma

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/study-unvaccinated-healthier-vaccinated-kids/?

New Study Supports Conclusion of Retracted 2020 Study Showing Unvaxxed Kids Healthier Than Vaxxed

A new study by James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. and Dr. Russell Blaylock supports the conclusions of a study by Dr. Paul Thomas, published in November 2020 and later retracted after an anonymous reader expressed concerns.

study unvaxxed vaxxed health kids feature

In November 2020, a study that carefully examined 10 years’ worth of data from a pediatric practice in Oregon run by Dr. Paul Thomas was published. Five days following the publication of the study, Thomas’ license was suspended.

A month after that, the journal decided to inform the authors that an anonymous reader had expressed some concerns about the study.

This single reader’s comments that involved bad guesswork led ultimately to the journal’s decision to retract the paper, leaving the authors stunned.

The authors knew that the reader’s concerns had already been addressed during peer review, and expected the journal to rule in favor of not retracting the paper. The journal editorial board knew this, too.

The concern centered primarily on the question of whether the large differences in the number of medical visits required for attention to specific health conditions like anemia, gastroenteritis, asthma, ear infections and many others, were due to parents who did not vaccinate not showing up to their well-baby and well-child visits.

Because Thomas’ license was suspended, he had to focus on his case and try to keep his life from falling apart; the medical board kept postponing the hearing, and no hearing had occurred.

In fact, no hearing has been held to date.

James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. suggested to Thomas that perhaps the medical board had overreached by applying a penalty without due process, a fact that Thomas then shared with his lawyer.

When his lawyer wrote the medical board pointing out that Thomas had suffered a penalty without due process, they offered to reinstate his license, pending the outcome of a hearing, on the condition that he do no more research.

This clearly shows the agenda of the medical board was not to ensure that the children in the practice were receiving good pediatric medical care.

It is now clear that the singular priority of the medical board was to shut down Thomas’ practice of abiding by informed consent — as required by Oregon state law for all medical procedures — and to prevent him from sharing any additional findings from the 10 years of data that had been collected from his practice.

New study supports earlier conclusions by Thomas

Today, the study is revived by a second study, this time conducted by Lyons-Weiler and his medical collaborator, Dr. Russell Blaylock.

In this second study, the following questions were addressed:

  1. Which group of patients adhered to the regular well-child visit better, the vaccinated patients or those who had refused vaccines?
  2. In groups of patients matched for health check visitation usage, which adverse health outcomes following vaccination differed between vaccinated patients and those who refused vaccines?
  3. After adjusting for healthcare visitations and age, do vaccines still significantly affect overall adverse health conditions in a manner independent of their interaction with healthcare visitations and age?
  4. Did older patients in the practice who stopped vaccinating experience a decrease in the adverse health outcomes that have been attributed to vaccines?

The study results, which are found in the paper entitled “Revisiting Excess Diagnoses of Illnesses and Conditions in Children Whose Parents Provide Informed Permission to Vaccinate Them” show that the anonymous reader’s concerns were unfounded; the unvaccinated families made their well-child visits with greater frequency than the vaccinated families.

This study, funded by the public, answers the first questions.

The answer to the second question is “results vary,” but this may be due to smaller sample sizes reducing power (see the study for details).

The study split the patients into high, medium and low health care visitation usage blocks, and many of the adverse health effects are seen increased in the vaccinated group of patients within these blocks (blocks are groups of patients matched on health care visitation usage).

For the third question, the scientists found that after defining a model that included healthcare visit utilization and age, vaccines were still a significant factor that increased adverse health outcomes, many of which had previously been associated with vaccines.

Moreover, the authors also determined that vaccines were still significant following consideration of the interaction term between vaccination status and the other model factors.

Importantly, had the study authors not considered the interaction term, the results would have seemed to imply that vaccination was negatively predictive of adverse health outcomes.

In the model in which vaccines, health care visits per age and the interaction term was considered, the number of vaccines was a positive significant predictor of overall adverse health.

Interaction terms are usually ignored by studies that “adjust for” variables. Adding covariates into the model without considering the interaction term with the main effect — vaccines — can mask a significant effect on the rates of post-vaccination health issues, providing a misleading result.

It’s worth noting that breastfeeding — another correlate of lifestyle measures — had no significant singular or interaction effects.

Blaylock posed the final question to Lyons-Weiler, who conducted the data analysis.

When older children were studied, and those who had the most vaccines were compared to those to those of the same age who had fewer vaccines, a clear pattern emerged for most of the adverse health outcomes: the risk of having a higher adverse health outcome was higher in the most-vaccinated older children compared to the least-vaccinated older children to a degree that was larger than that expected given any variation between the two groups in healthcare visit utilization.

This reflects the positive health effects of vaccine cessation.

vaccine cessation
The age-matched effects of vaccine cessation. High Relative Risk values denote increased risk of a given health outcome in patients receiving more vaccines in the older age group (>1,500 days of age). The black bar shows the Relative Risk of HCV between these groups as a baseline.

The relative risk of adverse health outcomes in older children who continued to vaccinate compared to those who ceased vaccination in Thomas’ practice.

Combined, all of these results mean that the method developed by Lyons-Weiler to consider the number of office visits needed for adverse health outcomes represents a robust, reliable and rigorous advance in methodology for the study of adverse health outcomes following medical exposures, including vaccines.

The method, “Relative Incidence of Office Visits,” had already been shown to be more powerful.

Lyons-Weiler reports that this is necessarily so because the measure contains more information than mere rates of diagnosis.

The RIOV measure has a higher dynamic range than odds ratios and relative risks based on diagnosis only. Studies that focus on the rates of diagnosis are using a subset of RIOV but are only limiting their count of office visits to that for the initial diagnosis.

The authors estimated that vaccination increases the need for visits to the doctor for vaccine-related health outcomes at a rate of 2.56 to 4.98 new chronic-illness-related visits per unit increase in vaccination per year.

“That translates into far more chronic illness in vaccinating children than in those not vaccinating, a disease burden that is not considered in risk: benefit considerations when it comes to vaccine policies and laws,” said Lyons-Weiler.

The paper, which was subjected to blinded peer review, describes all of the details of the results, is open access, and is published in the peer-reviewed journal International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Research, and Practice.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense

Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge

Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge brings knowledge and people together in the pursuit of success in research via progressive science.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

___________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/asthma-risk-kids-vaccine-aluminum-exposure-cdc-study/

36% Higher Risk of Asthma in Some Kids Who Had Vaccine-Related Aluminum Exposure, CDC Study Shows

A federally funded study released Tuesday reported a “positive association” between “vaccine-related aluminum exposure” and “persistent asthma” in children 24-59 months old, but the study’s authors were careful to not suggest a causal relationship.

asthma aluminum vaccine cdc study feature
 
Overall, kids in the study who received 3 mg or more of vaccine-related aluminum had at least a 36% higher risk of developing persistent asthma than kids who got less than 3 the study’s lead author, Dr. Matthew F. Daley, told The Associated Press.  (See link for article)
 
_________________
 
**Comment**
 
It should be noted that the CDC has never done a study comparing the vaccinated with unvaccinated nor with children who weren’t exposed to aluminum at all in their vaccines.  To date, the CDC has never studied the cumulative effects of all the vaccines together.  Studies only look at one vaccine at a time typically compared to another vaccine (not a true placebo). 

Christopher Exley, Ph.D., an expert on aluminum toxicity, agreed the study will likely not result in altering the use of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines.

Exley added:

“The idea is to concede the smallest possible ground on aluminum toxicity and at the same time reinforcing what they want readers to think by citing multiple papers by stooges and those working directly for the aluminum industry — a classic example being where the authors look to reinforce that ingested aluminum is not a health issue in infants.”

Please read the entire article for all the details.

Also, please read James Lyons-Weiler’s take on it as well. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the
association between aluminum exposure and asthma inci-
dence, stratified by eczema presence/absence.

Weiler states:

Raise your hand if you’re a parent and you have noticed that your child with eczema seems at risk of autoimmune conditions, including autoimmune diseases of the airways like persistent asthma when exposed to vaccines.

The risk was associated with vaccine-associated aluminum dose – and the increased risk was HUGE. “aHz of 1.26 per 1 mg increase in aluminum” means a 26% increase in the risk of asthma per 1,000 mcg aluminum-containing vaccine received. Children on the CDC’s schedule receive 5,640 mcg of aluminum by age 13, so children with eczema have a 78% increase in their risk of developing asthma by age 13 compared to kids who receive no aluminum-containing vaccines.

Kids without eczema had a 19% increase in asthma risk per 1 mg increase in vaccine-sourced aluminum; by age 13, they have a 57% increased risk of asthma compared to kids who receive no aluminum-containing vaccines.

He then proceeds to wipe the floor with Dr. Paul Offit, who is calling for “extraordinary evidence” which Weiler states means randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which will never happen (just like in Lymeland).

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines