Archive for the ‘Cancer’ Category

Pfizer CEO Very Proud to Have Saved the World & Plans to Do it Again As ‘Cancer is the New COVID’ & Two New COVID Variants Appear Right on Time

A previous article reveals that AstraZeneca finally admits in court that their shot can cause side effects.  Now, it has been withdrawn globally, but surplus of newer ‘vaccines’ is cited as the reason why, not the fact the company is being sued in a class action over claims of death and serious injury in dozens of cases. 

‘Vaccine’ manufacturers never admit fault or wrongdoing. They simply spin a negative into a positive.

Stock in Moderna and Pfizer fell considerably due to low demand for their mRNA products, but true to form, they are promising ‘next-generation vaccines’ to tackle new strains and new diseases. 

They too have the global elite moniker: never let an opportunity go to waste.

Expect a lot more because it’s where all the money is.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6352145666112

Pfizer: Cancer is the new Covid & they expect their cancer drugs to be a “blockbuster”

On Fox Business this weekend, CEO Albert Bourla, a veterinarian, said this:

“Oncology, it is our new Covid. We did what we did with Covid. We are very proud to have saved the world but it is behind us now. We want to do [it] once more and I think oncology is our best chance to do it.”

Saved the world?

The experimental Pfizer Covid gene therapy injection did not reduce Covid transmission nor is there any proof that it reduced severity or death from Covid. Their only positive is that vaccinated people were less likely to go on ventilators and even that data is shaky. One doctor has stated that he has ‘absolute faith that mRNA vaccines will kill you.’

Data shows that natural immunity to Covid is what ended the pandemic, not ‘vaccination.’  UK scientists were unable to reinfect healthy people with COVID, even at doses 10,000 times higher than the original.  

The CDC deliberately lied to the public not only about the effectiveness but the safety of these injections.

Further, autopsies show that 93% of people who died after the COVID shot were killed by the shot itself.  The shots are linked to myocarditis, pericarditis, ITP, GBS, Bells Palsy, ADEM, PE, Febrile seizures, and more.  The benefit is ‘ZERO in all populations,’ despite what the CDC states.

Estimates show the shots caused 600K American and 17M global casualties.

Then there’s the issue of the overt deception that was used from the very beginning with blank package vial inserts, patents on ‘nucleic acid self-assembling nanoparticles‘ that can be programmed to administer any type of spike protein pathogen (including bacilluls, Borrelia burgdorferi, brucella, chlamydia, clostridium, staphylococcus, diphtheria, enterococcus, E. coli, Francisella tularensis, Legionella, Leptospira, Listeria, Moraxella, Mycobacterium, Mycoplasma, and Neisseria, among 100 others that can be control-released over time) and the fact the CDC quietly changed the definition of what constitutes a vaccine so that mRNA gene therapy injections developed by the U.S. military can be included.  They aren’t vaccines.

Former Pfizer scientist, Dr. Michael Yeadon who no longer believes in the model of acute respiratory illnesses being caused by submicroscopic, infectious particles, commonly known as viruses, due to the fact that if this model was correct, it would be straightforward to show transmission or contagion. His predictions are:

  1. A new event will trigger obligatory digital ID (eg for rations).
  2. If 1. isn’t a financial crisis, one of which they can trigger at any time, will destroy all sovereign currencies and steal almost all private property (David Rogers Webb). Total dependence upon the state in order even to be fed. CBDC (digital-only money) introduced.
  3. Lies about a wave of pandemics. Pharma will pretend to make mRNA vaccines. Govts will mandate them (if WHO hadn’t already done so). Digital ID validity will depend upon being up to date on jabs. No jab, no food. CBDC simply won’t work.
  4. Rinse and repeat until population reaches their desired levels. I think it’s likely many countries will be completely emptied, removing the need for the authorities to have to pretend that recovery is even the dream, let alone intent.

As to cancer…every cancer registry in the world is up with new cases and documented rapid progression of disease aptly termed “turbo cancer.” Cases are up by 2.5X in New York state Medicaid vs. a 2017-2019 baseline, and The American Cancer Society states that this year the number of newly diagnosed cases of cancer will surpass  the 2 million mark for the first time ever.

The trendline went up with the rollout of genetic COVID-19 injections.  

And it’s not like the FDA didn’t know.  The Moderna patent explains that when a foreign DNA sequence integrates with a host organism’s genome, it could lead to the activation of oncogenes, mutated genes that have the potential to cause cancer, or the inhibition of tumor suppression genes.  Researchers in the U.S. and Canada recently found DNA fragments in COVID-19 mRNA shots.

Go here for a review of a study that shows repeated injections of mRNA COVID-19 injections are taking down immune surveillance for nascent malignant cells while at the same time inducing autoimmunity.  

How was this allowed to happen?

Manufacturers skipped preclinical oncogenicity studies.

The shots are highly contaminated with plasmids, SV40 sequences that have been linked to cancer, metals, PEG, nanotechnology, lipid nanoparticles, black particles, white floating matter, impurities from human fetal cell lines, hexagonal crystalline structures, parasites and eggs, and a hydra-like moving, self aware organisms.

But, according to the CDC, more than 240 billion dollars will be spent on cancer care in the United States on a yearly basis by 2030.  Just think about that.  That is close to a quarter of a trillion dollars going into the pockets of certain people and organizations.

How very timely and convenient.

And speaking of timely:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/here-we-go-two-new-covid-variants-named/

Here We Go: Two New COVID Variants Named ‘FLiRT’ Reportedly Spreading Across the U.S.

By  
 

Just in time for the election…

Two new COVID-19 variants, collectively known as “FLiRT,” have been detected and are reportedly spreading across the United States.

The FLiRT variants are sub-lineages of the Omicron variant, named for the mutations they bear.

The Infectious Disease Society of America states that the nickname ‘FLiRT’ is derived from the technical names of the variants’ mutations. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reclassified it as a variant of interest and recommended close monitoring.

According to Mass Live, citing the latest data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the KP.2 variant is currently the dominant strain, accounting for about 25% of all infections nationwide.

Another FLiRT variant, KP.1.1, is also circulating in the US but is less widespread, making up around 7.5% of infections.

So-called experts are now claiming that individuals without the updated COVID-19 vaccines are likely to become infected.

So there you have it.  

Pfizer and Moderna profits had been at record lows due to low demand for the Covid shot. Time for a shot in the arm to increase those profits!

Do you trust these companies to create mRNA cancer treatments that very well might be caused or exacerbated by the COVID products they created?

Category:

Activism, Cancer, vaccines, Viruses

WHO Predicts 77% Rise in Cancer & U.S. Cancer Morality Hits New High #ABV

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/who-projects-77-rise-in-cancer-unvaxxed-tracked-by-new-cdc-medical-codes-facts-  Video Here (Approx. 11 Min)

WHO Predicts 77% Rise in Cancer

About a week ago, the World Health Organization released a shocking projection. Specifically, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (which is a sub-agency of the WHO) they released a report which projected a 77 percent increase in the number of cancer cases (worldwide) by the year 2050.
In terms of why this is happening (why the global incidence of cancers is expected to go from 20 million per year to 35 million)—the WHO offered a few explanations:
“The rapidly growing global cancer burden reflects both population aging and growth, as well as changes to people’s exposure to risk factors, several of which are associated with socioeconomic development. Tobacco, alcohol and obesity are key factors behind the increasing incidence of cancer, with air pollution still a key driver of environmental risk factors.”
Although, notice that amidst the WHO explanation on what is causing this massive spike in cancers, there’s something not mentioned.
Something that billions of people took (or, were forced to take) over the past 3 years. And while at the moment, most online fact-checkers are dutifully saying that there is definitely no connection between the vaccines and cancers, well… the reality is that the vaccines have only been on the market for about 3 years now. And so, the long term of effects of them (the 5, 10, 15 year effects) are definitely unknown—despite what anyone might say.
However, fear not: because the CDC is now tracking those who are unvaccinated, in order to see what their health outcomes are compared to those who are vaccinated. Sort of like… a control group.
_________________
**UPDATE**
Within this video Japan’s most senior oncologist, Professor Fukushima, who is an author of the following paper condemns mRNA ‘vaccines’ as “evil practices of science.”
Therefore this vaccine was from the beginning based on misconception, misconduct, and evil practices of science, totally defective, founded on misconceptions, leading to a totally false production, a false product, I believe. ~ Prof. Fukushima
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/mechanisms-of-increased-oncogenesis?

Mechanisms of Increased Oncogenesis and Increased Mortality in Cancer Related to SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein mRNA Injections: Japan

Repeated Exposures Cause Increased Risk (#PathogenicPriming) in One Age Group so Far; Breast Cancer an Outlier

JAMES LYONS-WEILER
APR 12, 2024

A study by Gibo et al. (2024) entitled Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan, provides an analysis of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the vaccination efforts, on cancer mortality in Japan.

The study examines age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for various types of cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically looking at changes following the administration of the third dose of mRNA-lipid Nanoparticle injections.

The authors reported a distinct temporal pattern in cancer mortality rates.

In 2020, there was no noticeable increase in cancer mortality, indicating that the initial phase of the pandemic did not significantly affect cancer death rates. However, following the rollout of the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021, an increase in excess mortality for some cancer types was observed. This trend became more pronounced in 2022, after the administration of the third vaccine dose, where significant excess mortality was noted across all cancers, with particular increases in ovarian, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers. (See link for article) 

Vaxxed Couples Begin ‘Dropping Dead’ from ‘Dual Turbo Cancer’

Hunter Fielding

Doctors have issued an emergency alert after seeing a sharp increase in Covid mRNA vaccinated couples dying simultaneously shortly after a “dual turbo cancer diagnosis.”

The couple were all vaccinated at the same time and were later diagnosed with deadly cancers together.

Many doctors are warning that while their patients seem relatively healthy when they are diagnosed with cancer, most are dead within a week.

They warn that the rapid onset of the turbo cancers means the suffers are virtually “dropping dead.”  (See link for article & pictures of couples dead from cancer)

The author points out that approximately 70% of the world has received at least one dose of the COVID ‘vaccine.’  Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines can cause very aggressive cancers called “Turbo Cancer”.

Ethical Skeptic on X has put out new data today (April 4, 2024) showing that Cancer mortality in the United States has hit a new record high after being fairly flat over the past year. This is a very concerning development.

Image

According to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, 1 in 3 people will get cancer. He seems quite certain about this. (See link for article)

_____________

https://slaynews.com/news/turbo-cancer-deaths-surge-vaxxed-15-44-year-olds/

Turbo Cancer Deaths Surge in Vaxxed 15 to 44-Year-Olds

Frank Bergman

An alarming new study has revealed a dramatic surge in Covid mRNA vaccinated young people dying from turbo cancers.

According to a new study, official government data shows a shocking spike in turbo cancer deaths in young people aged 15- to 44 years old since 2021.

In the last three years, doctors have been reporting skyrocketing cases of deadly turbo cancers.

People who have been vaccinated with Covid mRNA injections have been suffering from a high incidence of these fast-developing cancers.

Some doctors are reporting that cancers are so rapidly developing that their patients are dying within a week of being diagnosed.

An analysis of U.K. government data shows an unprecedented increase in cancer deaths among 15- to 44-year-olds who were vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines, according to a new report by data analyst Edward Dowd. (See link for article)

________________
With cancer rates soaring, the powers that be ‘TPTB,’ are predictably blaming anything but the ‘vaccine’ (#ABV) including ‘accelerated aging.’
You can’t make this up.

https://www.foxnews.com/health/cancer-rates-rising-people-accelerated-aging-study-finds-highly-troubling

Cancer rates rising in young people due to ‘accelerated aging,’ new study finds: ‘Highly troubling’

Slowing biological aging could be a new avenue of cancer prevention, says longevity expert
 By Melissa Rudy
Published 

Accelerated aging — when someone’s biological age is greater than their chronological age — could increase the risk of cancer tumors.

That’s according to new research presented this week at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting in San Diego, California.

“Historically, both cancer and aging have been viewed primarily as concerns for older populations,” Ruiyi Tian, MPH, a graduate student at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and one of the study researchers, told Fox News Digital.  (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

A new peer-reviewed study has concluded that 1 in 4 who got the COVID gene therapy shot will die early.  Nearly 30% of the total sample in the study found themselves in the hospital with some form of cardiac complication after getting the shots.

But true to form, ‘public health’ is sticking with the ‘nothing to see here’ mantra.

Category:

Activism, Cancer, vaccines, Viruses

Evidence for the Presence of Borrelia Burgdorferi in Invasive Breast Cancer Tissues

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378802154_Evidence_for_the_presence_of_Borrelia_burgdorferi_in_invasive_breast_cancer_tissues

Evidence for the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi in invasive breast cancer tissues

March 2024

DOI:10.1556/1886.2024.00021
Authors:  Niraj Jatin Patel, Sahaja Thippani, Jasmine Jathan, Gauri Gauri
Show all 7 authors
Download full-text PDF

Abstract

Borrelia burgdorferi , the causative agent of Lyme disease, has recently been demonstrated to infect and enhance the invasive properties of breast cancer cells, while also influencing the expression of inflammatory chemokines (CXCL8 and CXCL10). This study investigates the presence of B. burgdorferi in invasive breast cancer tissues using commercially available, FDA-approved breast cancer tissue microarrays consisting of 350 ductal, 32 lobular, and 22 intraductal invasive breast carcinomas, alongside 29 normal breast tissues. Employing fluorescent immunohistochemical staining and high-resolution imaging, the findings revealed that
  • approximately 20% of invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas, followed by
  • 14% of intraductal carcinomas, tested positive for B. burgdorferi,
  • while all normal breast tissues tested negative.
  • PCR analysis further confirmed the presence of B. burgdorferi DNA in breast cancer tissues.
  • Moreover, 25% of B. burgdorferi – positive tissues exhibited expression of both chemokines, CXCL8 and CXCL10, which was not observed in B. burgdorferi – negative tissues.
  • Analysis of available patient data, including age, indicated a correlation between older patients and B. burgdorferi – positive tissues.

This study validates the presence of B. burgdorferi in invasive breast cancer tissues and highlights the involvement of key CXCL family members associated with inflammatory processes.

_______________

**Comment**

It all of a sudden becomes quite clear why ‘the powers that be’ simply had to bury ivermectin and HCQ.  These drugs are turning out to be highly anti-viral and anti-cancer.  More and more is coming out on these safe, cheap drugs that have been effectively repurposed for cancer.  Due to a court order, the FDA had to remove its controversial verbiage on ivermectin from its website.  Predictably, the FDA claims no wrongdoing despite an estimated 500,000 deaths due to its suppression of ivermectin, as well as the fact doctors lost their jobs for simply endorsing the drug.

The FDA has a lot to answer for.

I also highly recommend reading and listening to this:  https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/302-how-to-save-your-life-if-you

On a personal side note relating to the above link: my holistic doctor (RIP) once told me that he successfully treated female cancers with testosterone and male cancers with estrogen.  At the time there weren’t any studies on this hormone approach for cancer and all he had to support it was his 35 years of clinical experience.  Now, it finally appears there are some studies:  https://hormonebalance.org/publications/

Another doctor we used has completely restored women who have severe endometriosis by using a cocktail of synthetic testosterones (nandrolone and stanozolol) that doesn’t break down into estrogen as well as the anti-androgen spironolactone to counter any facial hair or lowering of the voice.  My daughter still uses this treatment and it has worked amazingly for over ten years.  To say it has changed her life would be an understatement.

This too is a big reason hormone therapy is nearly banned in mainstream medicine.  It just does too many things for health which interferes with Big Pharma profits.

If you haven’t figured it out yet, the FDA could care less about true health.

For more:

Category:

Cancer, Inflammation, Lyme, research

Ivermectin Win: FDA Must Remove Controversial Verbiage From its Website While DOJ Attempts to Shut Down Pfizer Fraud Case

**UPDATE**

Besides bad-mouthing ivermectin, a U.S. government ‘cartel’ bribed large pharmacy chains like Walgreens and CVS with billions of dollars in contracts to promote COVID-19 vaccines and not fill prescriptions for ivermectin.  See:  The FDA’s War Against America’s Health

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-dr-mary-talley-bowden-reacts

Agency Capitulates by Removing False Claims on Ivermectin from Social Media and Internet

MAR 25, 2024

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Thursday evening March 21, 2024, in an unprecedented court case, the US FDA led by  Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, a previously respected Duke Cardiologist, has settled a court case and taken down all of its false and misleading claims on ivermectin. The drug has been part of community standard of care for the treatment of COVID-19 with an excellent safety profile and signals of benefit in 101 studies.

During 2021, in what has been called “A War on Ivermectin” the US FDA engaged in false and misleading tweets and public messaging to dissuade doctors, pharmacists, and patients from using the drug in The McCullough Protocol and similar multi-drug regimens for acute COVID-19.  (See link for article and video)

According to an Epoch Times article , a court ordered the FDA to walk-back its negative posts about using ivermectin for COVID:

  • Studies show ivermectin works against COVID the FDA itself cites, but it’s webpage currently states it is not authorized or approved for use in preventing or treating COVID.
  • The court settlement requires the FDA to delete multiple social media posts that are strongly against ivermectin.
  • For doing this, doctors who sued the agency are dismissing their claims.
  • According to one of the doctors who sued, “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”
  • Another ivermectin prescribing doctor who saw lives saved states that due to FDA interference, “we will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’”
  • The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the law did not authorize the FDA to give medical advice.
  • Numerous doctors have chronicled the highly coordinated and timed actions between the FDA, CDC, AMA, APHA, and corporate controlled media to squash ivermectin – an extremely safe, cheap drug on the WHO’s essential list of medicines that has been used for decades without a prescription in many countries, including Africa which had essentially ZERO COVID due to the prolific use of the drug.

“FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine,” U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, wrote for the court. The appeals court remanded the case back to the district court.

Predictably, the FDA didn’t get the memo:
  • and has not “admitted any violation of law or any wrongdoing, disagrees with the plaintiffs’ allegation that the agency exceeded its authority in issuing the statements challenged in the lawsuit, and stands by its authority to communicate with the public regarding the products it regulates.”
  • and has not changed its position that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The agency has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19.”
Welcome to the Twilight Zone.

For a quick flashback, watch this video of a doctor being forcibly removed by police from a hospital board meeting simply for endorsing ivermectin that he used in his own private practice, and for evidently breaking protocol by whispering a “thanks” to a politician who questioned hospital policy. He shared at about 7:00 that doctors on staff at the hospital would come and see him to get ivermectin but would not speak their mind or prescribe it for fear of retribution from hospitals or their own medical groups. He states that 99% of doctors now have a contract with the hospital and are beholden to it, and that ‘brutal’ COVID treatment protocols, which one nurse blamed for 90% of hospital deaths, were followed to the letter due to government financial incentives.  Hospitals were simply not interested in early treatment which have saved lives and freed up hospital beds.

This video shows how the CARES Act signed into law in 2020 waived patient rights, and made hospitals rich (approx. 100K per COVID patient) due to these government incentives.

The ivermectin-prescribing doctor was unable to eat in the hospital employee lounge because he didn’t take the COVID shot.

And the reason the suit was brought in the first case was due to doctors suffering repercussions after prescribing ivermectin to patients with COVID.  Pharmacists refused to fill prescriptions.

The FDA is certainly guilty, as well as other government agencies.  But so are hospitals, medical groups like the AMA, APHA, ASHP, mainstream media, and doctors themselves.

Unless action is taken, this can and will happen again.

________________

https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-03-22-department-of-justice-intervenes-pfizer-fraud-case.

Collusion coverup: Department of Justice intervenes in Pfizer fraud case, in a corrupt attempt to shut the case down

03/22/2024  Lance D Johnson
Story at a glance: (summary by “Neo” LLM via Brighteon.AI)- The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is attempting to shut down the Pfizer fraud case scheduled for April 17.- The lawsuit alleges that Pfizer-BioNTech violated the False Claims Act during their clinical trials and knowingly delivered a defective product to the world.- Former employee Brook Jackson, who worked at Ventavia Research Group (a company that conducted some of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials), is suing Pfizer, her former employer Ventavia, and another Pfizer contractor, ICON plc.- The DOJ asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming it would be inconsistent with their public health policy.- The DOJ’s motion to dismiss cites a flimsy hypothesis authored by the FDA, which supports the faulty vaccines and contradicts Jackson’s claims of fraud and negligence.  (See link for article)

Pfizer sunk to unbelievable lows to peddle their gene therapy shots including using children in ads
The shot not only flopped, it caused more COVID infections & an inflammatory syndrome

For more:

Category:

Activism, Cancer, Treatment, vaccines

CHD Sues AT&T on Behalf of Woman Who Alleges Cell Tower Caused 51 Strokes & NJ Residents Win Right To Deny Verizon’s Application To Build Nine 5G Towers on Boardwalk

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-lawsuit-cell-tower-wireless-radiation-51-strokes-

CHD Sues AT&T on Behalf of Woman Who Alleges Cell Tower Caused 51 Strokes

The lawsuit, filed on March 11, is Children’s Health Defense’s second case that strategically uses the Americans with Disabilities Act on behalf of those who get sick from wireless radiation.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.

A Minnesota woman alleging the radiofrequency radiation emitted by a cell tower near her home triggered 51 strokes on Monday sued AT&T and other companies involved in the operation of the tower.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD), which is funding the lawsuit, filed the complaint on behalf of Marcia Haller, who previously told The Defender she became disabled shortly after the cell tower was “upgraded” in 2019.

In addition to suffering dozens of strokes since then, she’s suffered vision and hearing loss, headaches, sleep disruption, chronic fatigue and cognitive impairment. She also experiences ongoing issues with balance, orientation and mobility.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota (Duluth), alleges the companies operating the tower must provide Haller with a “reasonable accommodation” and/or modify their “policies, practices or procedures” to comply with federal disability law.

In addition to AT&T, defendants in the suit include T-Mobile and American Tower.

This is CHD’s second lawsuit leveraging the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) on behalf of individuals suffering from radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure.

“CHD is excited to file the second complaint in this strategic line of cases,” Miriam Eckenfels-Garcia, director of CHD’s Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) & Wireless program, said.

“We hope we will be able to help Marcia get relief, while at the same time, drive the conversation around electromagnetic sensitivity, RF radiation, and the lack of recourse for those harmed by cell towers forward,” Eckenfels-Garcia said.

The case draws attention to the need for better federal regulation of RF radiation and outlines the scientific evidence that debunks the “RF radiation is safe” narrative, according to Eckenfels-Garcia.

According to the lawsuit, Haller’s physician said that Haller’s symptoms — including “life-threatening embolic strokes” — occur when she is exposed to high levels of RF radiation or pulsated RF radiation, such as 5G.

“Her physical impairments already substantially limit major life activities … and RF exposure triggers and/or exacerbates her symptoms and condition,” the complaint said.

The companies could “easily and with minimal cost” take action to end Haller’s symptoms, “but they have refused to do so” — despite receiving a letter about her symptoms.

The suit asks the court to declare that the ADA applies to Haller’s situation. This would mean that the companies would be liable for discriminating against Haller because they failed to accommodate her disability.

It also seeks injunctive relief, meaning that it wants the court to order the companies to “end the discrimination” by either relocating their tower or reducing the amount of RF radiation it emits.

Haller is requesting a jury trial and compensation for attorney fees and costs.

Cell tower was likely ‘upgraded’ for 5G

Marcia and her husband, Jay, believe the cell tower was upgraded in 2019 for deploying 5G. “They [the companies] won’t admit to what they did,” Marcia told The Defender. “They say they don’t have to tell us.”

Marcia at the time was in her third semester of nursing school and worked as a certified nursing assistant at a hospital.

On the weekend after the upgrade, Marcia was at home and began feeling dizzy and as if something “just didn’t feel right.”

She called Jay, who runs a trucking business, telling him, “Something’s wrong in my head … I don’t know how to explain it. I just feel like crap.” But she told Jay she didn’t need him to come home. “I’ll be fine,” she said.

The physical sensation was “awful,” Marcia said. In addition to dizziness, she had headaches and nausea. “I couldn’t pick my head up off the pillow without the room spinning and feeling very sick.”

‘We think you’re having a stroke’

The symptoms continued. On Monday, she went to urgent care and was diagnosed with vertigo.

She returned home. A few days later, she had blind spots in her vision and tingling in her arm with “almost a numb feeling.”

Marcia called the on-call nurse center. They told her, “You need to come down to the emergency room. We think you’re having a stroke.”

An MRI of Marcia’s brain showed numerous damaged areas called lesions. She was admitted to the hospital on Oct. 10, 2019, and diagnosed with strokes, vision loss and balance difficulties.

After three days in the hospital, the strokes stopped happening — meaning MRIs of her brain showed no new lesions — and Marcia returned home.

But before the end of the month, Marcia “started feeling the same thing again” and went back to the emergency room.

Jay recalled, “We were home — the kid [Marcia and Jay’s son] and I — and she was cooking dinner … She turned around and her face had actually drooped on this one. It was like ‘uh-oh.’”

Marcia went back to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with more brain lesions. A neurologist told Marcia the MRI scan of her brain looked like a “starry night” because of how many white spots, or lesions, appeared.

The doctors still did not know what was causing them, she said.

Multiple trips to the hospital

Over the following weeks, Marcia went “back and forth a few times” between her home and her local hospital.

After a night or two at the hospital, she would begin feeling better. But after returning home, her symptoms reemerged and she’d have to return to the hospital. “Each time, more strokes,” she said.

According to Jay, “A week or 10 days later, there’d be seven or 10 new ones [lesions appearing in the MRI scans]. This was going on for about a month. I think we rounded up to about 51 complete strokes.”

Still, her local hospital doctors couldn’t explain why this was happening.

In November 2019, Marcia saw doctors at the Mayo Clinic who began treating her symptoms with plasmapheresis to put new plasma in her blood, steroids and a medication called CellCept.

But after a second round of treatment, Marcia had more strokes — including one that temporarily impaired her hearing — and she continued to experience extreme fatigue.

‘That’s when we started piecing things together’

During one of Marcia’s stays at the Mayo Clinic, Jay “just woke up” with a strong sense that the cell tower radiation was causing Marcia’s symptoms. “Then he started doing research and that’s when we started piecing things together,” Marcia explained.

Based on what Jay was discovering, he and Marcia decided to try living elsewhere.

On March 3, 2020, they and their son moved into Marcia’s parents’ house a mile further away from the tower. Marcia “got a lot better,” she said. The strokes stopped.

By June, she was talking about returning to school, Jay said. “We’d go fishing every night and she just had a lot more energy.”

Around the same time, Marcia’s doctors at the Mayo Clinic had Marcia taking pill chemotherapy. “So they’re patting themselves on the back for the chemo,” Jay said, “I think it was moving that made it stop.”

But in October 2020, Marcia’s parents returned so Jay, Marcia and their son moved back to their house close to the tower.

In just a week, Marcia started experiencing the same symptoms again.

‘Living through this has stolen a piece of us we will never get back’

Jay and Marcia became more convinced that the RF radiation from the tower was making Marcia sick.

They think living so close to the tower may have been a factor in Jay’s development of rheumatoid arthritis. Their son, too, has had negative health episodes — including a major blood clot in his left arm — that Marcia and Jay suspect may have been linked to the radiation.

Jay said he wouldn’t call it a coincidence that “all members of our household have been struck with rare illnesses and permanent health problems that will impair us for the rest of our lives.”

“Living through this has stolen a piece of us we will never get back,” he added.

Oct. 16, 2020, they hired Frank DiCristina — a certified building biologist and certified EMR specialist — to measure the wireless radiation levels throughout their home.

DiCristina’s report showed peaks of up to 18 milliwatts per squared meter (mW/m2) — which is 18 times higher than what the Standard of Building Biology considers the “extreme limit,” noted DiCristina in the report.

In late October 2020, Jay constructed a Faraday cage — an enclosure with metal lining that blocks out all RF radiation — to give Marcia a place of relief from the radiation.

Having a space free of RF radiation has made a big difference in Marcia’s well-being, but she said it’s not fun having to go into a small enclosed space to feel OK.

She and Jay call the Faraday cage “the penalty box.” It’s a tiny room with no power and no windows — just a “complete black box with two beds,” Marcia said.

She and Jay sleep there, with their 18-year-old son spending the night away from home as often as possible. “I would be nervous to sleep in my house because I don’t want to get sick again,” Marcia said.

Marcia also now wears a silver-lined baseball cap designed to block RF radiation when in her home. With these measures, she slowly was able to complete her nursing program and return to work.

However, she still experiences symptoms on her property when outside the Faraday cage. “Simple things like enjoying the fire pit, gardening and just relaxing on the deck are now basically a memory,” Marcia said.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/new-jersey-residents-opposing-5g-towers-intervene-verizon-lawsuit/

New Jersey Residents Opposing 5G Towers Win Right to Intervene in Verizon Lawsuit

A federal judge last week gave residents of Belmar, New Jersey, the green light to intervene in a lawsuit brought by Verizon against Monmouth County after county officials denied the telecom giant’s applications to build nine 5G towers on a stretch of boardwalk located in the county.

Residents of Belmar, New Jersey, won the right to intervene in a lawsuit Verizon brought against Monmouth County officials for allegedly illegally denying the telecom giant’s applications to build nine 5G towers on a stretch of boardwalk located in the county.

U.S. Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day last week ruled that a local activist group, Belmar Against 5G Towers, and seven individuals who claim Verizon’s proposed wireless facilities could harm their local environment and property values may join the suit. (See link for article)

Important quote:

“The proposed 5G towers impact their health, the environment they live in, their property values and the aesthetics of their neighborhood, so it is important that they can advocate for their interests in this litigation,” Eckenfels-Garcia told The Defender.

________________

**Comment**

Expect to see more of this.

How many are experiencing symptoms but are not connecting the dots to EMF?

Once again, technology is being widely rolled out despite lack of safety. Please also note the supreme power the utility companies have been given and their complete lack of transparency and their disregard for human health.  This is the new norm, unfortunately.  I have discovered this personally when attempting to “opt out” of Smart Meters.  They simply don’t care.

People shouldn’t have to sue the utility company to be free of radiation emitting technology but here we are.  People also shouldn’t have to spend thousands of dollars to hire a company to expose and ameliorate this radiation as well, yet here we are.

Yes, a person could move, but before long there won’t be anywhere on planet earth to move to escape this damaging technology.  And that is, after all, the whole reason for it.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Cancer