**UPDATE**

Just today, ICAN previously reported that Dr. Barney Graham, Deputy Director of the Vaccine Research Center at Fauci’s agency – the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) within the NIH – stands to earn millions from sales of the Moderna vaccine, demonstrating a clear conflict of interest between his personal financial interest, and his role in developing safe and effective vaccines. When ICAN got Graham’s emails, many with Moderna’s CEO were redacted, as well as emails with Ralph Baric, a professor at UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health with ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

http://  Approx. 12 min

Jan. 11, 2022

Emails Showing Fauci CONCEALED Lab Leak Info

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/government-oversight-committee-publishes  Video Here

Government Oversight Committee Publishes That Fauci Was Aware of Evidence of a Lab Leak – and May Have Manipulated Science to Cover Up Lab Leak Theory

It’s Now Official. It’s Time for Action.

Even as Sen. Rand Paul calls Fauci out for spending his $480,000 per year income to call Harvard and Yale epidemiologists “fringe”

The GOP Oversight Committee has released a letter – and emails – asking tough questions about Fauci’s involvement in an alleged cover-up of evidence in support of a lab-leak origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Specifically, the letter states that he worked with Peter Daszak to side-step policies restricting gain-of-function research. Note they are not saying he “allegedly” did this.

“Despite Dr. Fauci claiming otherwise on multiple occasions, he was, in fact, aware of the monetary relationship between NIAID, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), EcoHealth Alliance Inc. (EcoHealth), and the WIV by January 27, 2020. Dr. Fauci also knew that NIAID worked with EcoHealth to craft a grant policy to sidestep the gain-of-function moratorium at the time. This new policy, designed by EcoHealth and agreed to by NIAID, allowed EcoHealth to complete dangerous experiments on novel bat coronaviruses—with very little oversight—that would have otherwise been blocked by the moratorium. In January 2020, Dr. Fauci was also aware that EcoHealth was not in compliance with the terms of its grant that funded the WIV.4 EcoHealth was required to submit an annual progress report to NIAID by September 30, 2019, and had not yet done so.”

The letter also informs Becerra that they will be interviewing Fauci over this issue and over the issue of his secret phone call with 11 scientists – none of whom work for the US Government – to spin the evidence that showed that the mutational differences between SARS-CoV-2 and other betacoronaviruses were not consistent with evolutionary processes.

They want to know if Fauci or Collins personally edited the cover-up piece, published in Nature Medicine. If they did, they are guilty of conspiring to mislead other government officials.  (See link for article as well as letter to Becerra)

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/military-documents-about-gain-of-function-contradict-fauci-testimony-under/  Video Here if they scrub the Youtube video

http://  Approx. 7 Min

Military Documents About Gain of Function Contradict Fauci Testimony Under Oath

  • Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.
  • The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
  • “The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
  • Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were buried.

[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.

The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top secret shared drive.

DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications.

Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.

The report states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the basis gain of function research moratorium.

According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S.

Dr. Fauci has repeatedly maintained, under oath, that the NIH and NAIAD have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program. But according to the documents obtained by Project Veritas which outline why EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal was rejected, DARPA certainly classified the research as gain of function. 

“The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.

Major Murphy’s report goes on to detail great concern over the COVID-19 gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines.

Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said,

“It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were shrouded in secrecy. “If something resides in a classified setting, then it should be appropriately marked,” Adams said. “I’m not at all familiar with unmarked documents that reside in a classified space, no.”

In a video breaking this story published on Monday night, Project Veritas CEO, James O’Keefe, asked a foundational question to DARPA:

“Who at DARPA made the decision to bury the original report? They could have raised red flags to the Pentagon, the White House, or Congress, which may have prevented this entire pandemic that has led to the deaths of 5.4 million people worldwide and caused much pain and suffering to many millions more.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci has not yet responded to a request for comment on this story.

READ THE DOCUMENTS

REJECTION OF DEFUSE PROJECT PROPOSAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DEFUSE

BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT PREventing EMerging Pathogenic Threats(PREEMPT)

U.S. Marine Corp Major Joseph Murphy’s Report to Inspector General of DoD

About Project Veritas

James O’Keefe established Project Veritas in 2010 as a non-profit journalism enterprise to continue his undercover reporting work. Today, Project Veritas investigates and exposes corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions to achieve a more ethical and transparent society and to engage in litigation to: protect, defend and expand human and civil rights secured by law, specifically First Amendment rights including promoting the free exchange of ideas in a digital world; combat and defeat censorship of any ideology; promote truthful reporting; and defend freedom of speech and association issues including the right to anonymity. O’Keefe serves as the CEO and Chairman of the Board so that he can continue to lead and teach his fellow journalists, as well as protect and nurture the Project Veritas culture.  

Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization. Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues raised through its investigations.  

_________________

For more:

https://www.lifezette.com/2022/01/supremes-hear-biden-case-for-vaccine-mandates

Supremes Hear Biden Case For Vaccine Mandates

This one will be close.

Justices are hearing arguments on vaccine mandates. It could go either way, with smart money against Biden. But watch Roberts, he’s gone south on important health issues before.

FNC: “The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Friday in a high-stakes public session to decide whether the U.S. government can begin enforcing sweeping COVID 19 vaccine requirements affecting nearly 100 million workers.

For three hours and 40 minutes, the justices heard oral arguments over federal vaccine and testing rules for businesses with 100 employees or more, and on vaccine mandates for health care workers at facilities receiving Medicaid and Medicare funding.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

Unfortunately, the author of the article didn’t utilize facts & data that are now available:

  • Nobody has a clue what’s in these injections and this should alarm everyone.
  • Independent researchers from across the globe are finding frightening contaminants.
  • Independent researchers are finding frightening objects in the blood of the “vaxxed”.
  • These injections have caused more adverse reactions & death than any other vaccine in VAERS history.
  • An American Heart Association study shows a link between the shots and heart attacks and the data has been confirmed by others.
  • Even the CDC admits the shots are causing heart disease.
  • A large Israeli study shows the Pfizer shot increases myocarditis three-fold.
  • None of these injections stop transmission or infection so the argument that lives are being lost daily due to dropping the “vaccine” mandate is completely false.
  • Although there are obvious holes in ‘breakthrough’ case reporting, data on the “vaccinated” shows many things:

The following data completely dismantles the narrative that these fast-tracked, experimental, unproven injections which aren’t vaccines, do not stop infection or transmission, have a boat-load of contaminants, and have caused more sickness and death than any vaccine in the history of VAERS, reduce hospitalization & death.  That is a lie.

The following independent analysis has been ignored by the CDC, the FDA and the NIH since October of 2021.

https://vector-news.github.io/editorials/CausalAnalysisReport_html.html

Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries

2021-11-15

Abstract

Policy makers and mainstream news anchors have promised the public that the COVID-19 vaccine rollout worldwide would reduce symptoms, and thereby cases and deaths associated with COVID-19. While this vaccine rollout is still in progress, there is a large amount of public data available that permits an analysis of the effect of the vaccine rollout on COVID-19 related cases and deaths. Has this public policy treatment produced the desired effect?

One manner to respond to this question can begin by implementing a Bayesian causal analysis comparing both pre- and post-treatment periods. This study analyzed publicly available COVID-19 data from OWID (Hannah Ritchie and Roser 2020Hannah Ritchie, Lucas Rodés-Guirao, Edouard Mathieu, and Max Roser. 2020. “Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19).” Our World in Data.) utlizing the R package CausalImpact (Brodersen et al. 2015Brodersen, Kay H., Fabian Gallusser, Jim Koehler, Nicolas Remy, and Steven L. Scott. 2015. “Inferring Causal Impact Using Bayesian Structural Time-Series Models.” Annals of Applied Statistics 9: 247–74. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-aoas788.) to determine the causal effect of the administration of vaccines on two dependent variables that have been measured cumulatively throughout the pandemic: total deaths per million (y1) and total cases per million (y2). After eliminating all results from countries with p > 0.05, there were 128 countries for y1 and 103 countries for y2 to analyze in this fashion, comprising 145 unique countries in total (avg. p < 0.004).

Results indicate that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 or y2 over and above what would have been expected with no treatment. y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means

  • 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment (vaccine) initiation.

y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means

  • 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment (vaccine) initiation.

Causal impacts of the treatment on y1 ranges from -19% to +19015% with an average causal impact of +463.13%. Causal impacts of the treatment on y2 ranges from -46% to +12240% with an average causal impact of +260.88%. Hypothesis 1 Null can be rejected for a large majority of countries.

This study subsequently performed correlational analyses on the causal impact results, whose effect variables can be represented as y1.E and y2.E respectively, with the independent numeric variables of: days elapsed since vaccine rollout began (n1), total vaccination doses per hundred (n2), total vaccine brands/types in use (n3) and the independent categorical variables continent (c1), country (c2), vaccine variety (c3). All categorical variables showed statistically significant (avg. p: < 0.001) postive Wilcoxon signed rank values (y1.E V:[c1 3.04; c2: 8.35; c3: 7.22] and y2.E V:[c1 3.04; c2: 8.33; c3: 7.19]). This demonstrates that the distribution of y1.E and y2.E was non-uniform among categories. The Spearman correlation between n2 and y2.E was the only numerical variable that showed statistically significant results (y2.E ~ n2: ρ: 0.34 CI95%[0.14, 0.51], p: 4.91e-04). This low positive correlation signifies that countries with higher vaccination rates do not have lower values for y2.E, slightly the opposite in fact. Still, the specifics of the reasons behind these differences between countries, continents, and vaccine types is inconclusive and should be studied further as more data become available. Hypothesis 2 Null can be rejected for c1, c2, c3 and n2 and cannot be rejected for n1, and n3.

The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policy makers.

They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the “key to gain back our freedoms.” The effect of vaccines on total cases per million and its low positive association with total vaccinations per hundred signifies a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19 associated cases. These results should encourage local policy makers to make policy decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates.

These results should also encourage policy makers to begin looking for other avenues out of the pandemic aside from mass vaccination campaigns.

Some variables that could be included in future analyses might include vaccine lot by country, the degree of prevalence of previous antibodies against SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 in the population before vaccine administration begins, and the Causal Impact of ivermectin on the same variables used in this study.

“Untruth naturally afflicts historical information. There are various reasons that make this unavoidable. One of them is partisanship for opinions and schools. If the soul is impartial in receiving information, it devotes to that information the share of critical investigation the information deserves, and its truth or untruth thus becomes clear. However, if the soul is infected with partisanship for a particular opinion or sect, it accepts without a moment’s hesitation the information that is agreeable to it. Prejudice and partisanship obscure the critical faculty and preclude critical investigation. The result is that falsehoods are accepted and transmitted” — Ibn Khaldun, 1379 A.D.

For more:

https://www.theblaze.com/news/cnn-anchor-calls-out-cdc-for-misleading-covid-hospitalization-data-and-dr-sanjay-gupta-agrees

CNN anchor calls out CDC for ‘misleading’ COVID hospitalization data, and Dr. Sanjay Gupta agrees

CNN anchor Jake Tapper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta, the network’s top medical correspondent, agreed Monday the method being used by the government to report COVID-19 hospitalizations is explicitly “misleading.”

What is the background?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which manages COVID data reporting, does not distinguish between people hospitalized for COVID (meaning complications from the virus caused them to be hospitalized) or people hospitalized with COVID (meaning people who test positive for COVID after being admitted for reasons unrelated to the virus).

(See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

In a rare moment of lucidity, mainstream media gets something correct. Everyone pause for a moment of thanks.

Highlights:

  • CDC’s Walensky was confronted “for COVID” numbers versus “with COVID” numbers, but she couldn’t give them.  Supposedly, that data is forthcoming.  (Don’t hold your breath)
  • NY data show that more people were hospitalized for reasons not related to COVID but then tested positive for COVID after being admitted.
  • CNN managed to cough up that COVID hospitalizations are likely inflated and are therefore ‘misleading.’
  • CNN’s Dr. Gupta even agreed stating there needs to be transparency.
  • Walensky faces increasing criticism over CDC-waffles.  Recently, she reported a CDC study that showed 75% of COVID deaths after “vaccination” have ‘at least four comorbidities.’ 

“Contrary to popular belief, CDC Director, disabled people aren’t just data points … How callous to say you’re encouraged by the prospect of their deaths,” Imani Barbarin, a disability rights activist, wrote.

Matthew Cortland, a lawyer who suffers from a chronic illness, tweeted: “It is ‘encouraging’ to [Walensky] that chronically ill and disabled Americans are dying … our deaths clearly don’t count.”

And these sentiments exemplify what this website has been desperately trying to highlight: human health is individual and highly complex. Medicine should never be a “one-size fits all” box where human beings are given the same exact formula. Time for real medical professionals to stand up for what is common, logical knowledge in the real world of facts.

For more:

And can we please quit talking about these shots as anything other than fast-tracked gene–modifying medical devices that don’t stop transmission or infection, have caused more death and adverse events than any other vaccine in the 30 year history of VAERS, and whose contents are completely unknown and unproven?

https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-biowarfare-pat-smith-lda/

Jan. 10, 2022

Answers still needed about possible biowarfare connection to Lyme disease

By Pat Smith

Forty-six years after a mother alerted public health about an unknown disease affecting her Connecticut neighborhood, patients still await answers about Lyme disease and help from the federal government− little has been forthcoming.

It’s been 37 years since I first saw Lyme as a board of education member in New Jersey, and 29 years since I first contacted New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith for help regarding Lyme disease.

I approached him because my school district had many seriously ill students and staff members who could find little medical help and no assistance for disrupted educations. Congressman Smith set up a Washington DC meeting for me with CDC and NIH officials to present a report on nine Monmouth/Ocean NJ school districts in the same situation, yet no public health authorities were involved to help the districts.

Shocking devastation

Officials were shocked and could not believe the devastation I described to them. They subsequently came to NJ and did their own study of five of the school districts, which confirmed the effects on the districts and these children. Congressman Smith held a Congressional meeting in Wall Township which overflowed the room. The CDC presented its study, and I spoke at this meeting as did my daughter who was then suffering seizures from Lyme.

The CDC refused to publish its school study, continuing to tell me they would, so the LDA asked the Lyme Times [published by LymeDisease.org] to publish it a few years ago for all to read, as it had been presented publicly by CDC.

Patients and advocates have been benefiting from Mr. Smith’s efforts to help us change that situation. Working with Congressman Smith, the Lyme Disease Association has been able to get bills introduced and passed over decades; educate federal & state legislators; help set up a federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group under the Department of Health and Human Services; help parents threatened with Munchausen-by-proxy [an accusation that the parents have made the child sick] whose children were going to be removed because of long-term treatment with antibiotics; and help doctors whose licenses were threatened for treating with antibiotics. Sadly, some parents still have had their children removed and Lyme-treating physicians continue to be harassed.

Unanswered questions

Uncomprehendingly, we are left with many asked but unanswered questions. There continues to be government resistance to solving even the most basic issues. One is the continued use of tests discussed during a 1994 meeting where dissenting researchers were refused the right to present a minority report—tests which studies have shown are less than 50% accurate, whereby a person can test negative and still have the disease. Scientists have come forth over time with tests to be examined, but CDC has appeared to have neither considered them nor recommended them for further study to our knowledge.

Why do CDC and NIH continue to rely on one set of treatment guidelines for Lyme disease which recommend (read: allow) only a few weeks of doxycycline for a complex organism such as Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria that causes Lyme disease, when there is another set of guidelines that permit doctor discretion?

Why are patients still told: it’s in your head; you need a psychiatrist; you’re cured because you had two weeks of treatment; you have to learn to live with it; don’t use alternative therapies; it’s not Lyme? (When you ask what is it, the response is a shrug.)

Why are some patients being misdiagnosed with MS, ALS, CFS, FM, lupus, ADD, RA, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s which turn out to be Lyme and other tick-borne diseases apparently causing these symptoms in a number of cases?

Why are doctors who help patients get better with long-term and combinations of antibiotics still called quacks, unable to be a part of insurance plans, and subject to medical board actions?

Why is research being privately funded in prestigious institutions investigating antibiotic treatment options while the government says research is done, and that long-term antibiotics don’t work and can be harmful?

Denial of chronic Lyme

Many doctors, scientists, patients, and advocates have known for decades it’s “chronic Lyme”—persisting symptoms after short-term treatment. This occurs in 20% or more of Lyme patients−often combined with other tick-borne diseases, almost 20 of which are now found in the US, and can be acquired singly or in combinations.

Those suffering or helping these patients have been ridiculed in media over the decades, with Lyme called a housewife’s disease, a yuppie disease, mass hysteria, conspiracy theory, hoax perpetrated by those anti science.  In 2021, the “long haulers” of COVID 19 have thankfully not been scorned or shamed, why are “chronic Lyme” sufferers singled out for this abuse?

Why investigate any biowarfare origins?

The origins of COVID19 have already been investigated and linked with the NIH having been shown to have funded “gain of function” research—modifying a biological agent to confer new or enhanced activity to that agent. Why is it then a conspiracy theory to investigate the murky origins of Lyme?

Biowarfare has been out there for hundreds of years.

“Man has used poisons for assassination purposes ever since the dawn of civilization, not only against individual enemies but also occasionally against armies. However, the foundation of microbiology by Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch offered new prospects for those interested in biological weapons because it allowed agents to be chosen and designed on a rational basis.”  (F. Frischnecht, Pasteur Institute: 2003, EMBO, “The History of Biological Warfare”-see NIH website)

It’s time for government transparency. Provide whatever the truth is about tick releases and other tick-borne disease experiments that some US scientists have come forth with and that government documents appear to support

476,000 people are diagnosed and treated annually in the US according to CDC. They and the general public deserve to know what happened in the past, to aid in the search for prevention and cure of Lyme and other tick-borne diseases.

Pat Smith is President of the Lyme Disease Association, which funds research, promotes education and jointly puts on an annual scientific conference with Columbia University. From 2017-2020, she served on the federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group.

___________________

For more:

**UPDATE March, 2023**

This update contains a list of pilots and flight attendants who recently had cardiac arrests inflight, many of whom died suddenly.  Now, in a “cost cutting solution,” and due to staffing shortages, there is a push to only have ONE fully vaxxed pilot in the cockpit which would be devastating should it occur, due to the potential for these pilots to suffer events while flying with no one else to take over.

https://rumble.com/vs048b-jab-injured-pilot-speaks-out-pilot-blacks-out-mid-air-bioweapon-shot-tearin.html  Video Here  (Approx. 17 Min)

COVID Shot Injured Pilot Speaks on Stew Peter’s Show

Cody Flint is 34 years old. Until recently he worked as an agricultural pilot. He has fifteen years of flying experience. Like so many other people, Cody received the Pfizer shot last year. He waited 48 hours, then went up for a flight, but everything was wrong. He got a severe headache, “like a bomb went off inside his head.” He got tunnel vision, couldn’t properly move his arms and legs, and he even blacked out. It’s a miracle he managed to successfully land his plane, and Cody isn’t sure how he did it because he doesn’t remember actually landing. Cody Flint joins us to discuss.

Now, ponder for a moment all the other pilots flying commercial airplanes which could be putting the public at great risk due to an injection that isn’t safe or effective, and isn’t even needed due to safe, effective treatments for COVID.

__________________

https://rumble.com/vrwsu9-pilot-speaks-out.html  Video Here (Approx 2 Min)

Another Pilot Speaks Out

Pilot Greg Pearson experienced heart issues after the COVID jab.  He was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation which can lead to blood clots in the heart and is a major cause of strokes. He states other pilots are too afraid to speak up even though they too are experiencing adverse reactions.

_________________

https://rumble.com/vrg01s-46096192.html  Video Here (Approx 22 Min)

Mother of Teen Working to Become Pilot Speaks Out

Canadian MPP Randy Hillier Exposes Adverse Reactions In Canada: 16 year old, actively working to become a pilot has been forced to put his dreams on hold because of the results of the pressure he faced to receive the shot.

  • pins and needles after shot
  • light headed, feel like he was going to pass out
  • chest pain
  • couldn’t breathe
  • heart rate was 137 bpm when his normal rate was 78 bpm
  • ultrasound showed water around his heart (pericarditis). Doctor states it is a “known side effect” of the Pfizer shot

For more:

___________________

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IQoUmvcoiStX/  Video Here (Approx. 11 Min)

“The Bigger Plan”

Dr. Chetty calls it “covid illness,” because a virus has not been completely isolated; however, the pathogen causing sickness and death IS the spike protein, and spike protein is what the “vaccine” is meant to make in your body.  He states this protein is one of the most contrived toxins or poisons that man has ever made, and that the aim of this toxin is to kill billions without anyone noticing. So the toxin or poison has been put into a virus (vector) to expose the entire population.

“This plan is to make sure that we can control and kill off a large proportion of our population without anyone suspecting that we were poisoned and so I think the justification for everything we see is warranted in understanding the endgame.” ~ Dr. Shankara Chetty

South African doctor, Dr. Shankara Chetty is a general practitioner with a natural science background in genetics, advanced biology,microbiology and biochemistry. From the start of the Covid pandemic, he has been critically watching the information arising from observations around the world.  He clearly explains what the COVID injections do and don’t do.  The spike protein is the toxin.

___________________

https://www.bitchute.com/video/LPBdTIqVXocL/  Video Here (Approx. 11 Min)

More Microscopy on COVID Vials Showing Sharp Objects, Worms With Eggs, & Perhaps a Microchip

German Pathologists and doctors present an analysis of the coronavirus “vaccine” during a shocking press conference in September, 2021. A clip of the conference reveals they also found numerous foreign objects in the injection, as well as in ‘vaxxed’ blood.

The live-streamed press conference was organized by the Stiftung Corona-Ausschuss, which can be loosely described as Germany’s equivalent of America’s Frontline Doctors. As expected, their remarkable presentation was slammed by the German legacy media.

The event was spearheaded by:

  • Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, who served as “head of the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years and then worked as a pathologist in private practice”
  • Prof. Dr. Walter Lang, who “worked as a pathologist at the Hannover Medical School from 1968 to 1985” before founding a private institute for pathology in Hanover 
  • Prof. Dr. Werner Birkholz, a former professor of electrical engineering with a focus on quality and risk management at Jacobs University in Bremen.
  • Introductions and the presentation was made by Dr. Ute Langer, a physician, and a surgeon.

SUMMARY:

  • Some of the foreign objects were described as “accurately constructed.”
  • Worms/parasites with visible eggs, which would normally drop their tail – had intact tails and were clearly seen – even their digestive tract. 
  • The type of worms seen cause cancer and severe pain as in rheumatoid diseases, joint pain, or even Alzheimer’s if they are found in the brain.
  • There appears to be an object that could be a microchip.  There are transparent objects with very sharp edges that shine like glass.
  • In May of 2021, Ulm University stated on South West TV News that after examining 4 batches of AstraZeneca COVID vials, up to two-thirds of the contents had substances that don’t belong there and only one-third was actually “vaccine” material.  Nobody has a clue what these foreign substances do inside the human body.
  • Authorities simply do not care and the manufacturing company didn’t even bother to respond. 
  • In December, the German doctors held a second powerful press conference headlined “Are Deaths and Adverse Health Effects After Vaccination Against Covid-19 Related in a Pathologically Detectable Way?”.

Please see this article on the subject, complete with pictures of the foreign objects as well as a transcript.  Also, go here for over 1,000 studies showing the COVID injections are dangerous.

For more:

Independent experts from across the globe are finding the exact same things.