Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

UK & US Data: COVID-19 “Vaccine”-Induced Fatality High & Israeli Ministry of Health Conducts “Vaccine” Survey: So Many Serious Events They Started Deleting Them

https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Seneff_costBenefit.pdf

COVID19 and AllCause Mortality Data by Age Group Reveals Risk of COVID VaccineInduced Fatality is Equal to or Greater than the Risk of a COVID death for all Age Groups Under 80 Years Old as of 6 February 2022.

Kathy Dopp, MS Mathematics and Stephanie Seneff, PhD
13 February 2022.

Abstract

As of 6 February 2022, based on publicly available official UK and US data, all age groups under 50
years old are at greater risk of fatality after receiving a COVID19 inoculation than an unvaccinated
person is at risk of a COVID19 death. All age groups under 80 years old have virtually no benefit from receiving a COVID19 inoculation, and the younger ages incur significant risk. This analysis is
conservative because it ignores the fact that inoculationinduced adverse events such as thrombosis, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, and other vaccineinduced injuries can lead to shortened life span. When one takes into consideration the fact that there is approximately a 90% decrease in risk of COVID19 death if early treatment is provided to all symptomatic highrisk persons, one can only conclude that mandates of COVID19 inoculations are illadvised. Considering the emergence of antibodyresistant variants like Delta and Omicron, for most age groups COVID19 vaccine inoculations result in higher death rates than COVID19 does for the unvaccinated.

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • For those under age 18, “vaccination” increases their COVID death rate and they are 51 times more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 18 to 29 are 16 times more likely to die from COVID vaccination than to prevent one COVID death and are eight times more likely to die from vaccination than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 30 to 39 are 15 times more likely to die from COVID inoculation than to prevent one COVID death, and seven times more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 40 to 49 are nine times more likely to die from the COVID inoculation than likely to prevent one COVID death in this age group, and five times more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 50 to 59 are twice (two times) more likely to die from the COVID inoculation than to prevent one COVID death and are slightly more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 60 to 79 are virtually equally likely to die from the COVID inoculation as to prevent one COVID death or die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 80+ are 0.13% less likely to die from the COVID inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.

____________________

https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/the-israeli-ministry-of-health-actually

The Israeli Ministry of Health Actually Did a Survey of Adverse Events after The Booster Dose

And it’s absolutely devastating

Well surprise, surprise. The Israeli Ministry of Health (MoH) conducted an actual survey of about two thousand people 3-4 weeks after they received the third (booster) shot of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, asking them about the adverse events they experienced following vaccination. The results are absolutely devastating to the COVID-19 vaccine program and the push for vaccine mandates.  (See link for article)

SUMMARY:

  • While the Israeli public was told by ‘every talking head on TV and every newspaper’ that the shots were extremely safe, the MoH and CDC completely ignored the unambiguous and unprecedented safety signals emanating from VAERS and IMOH, both of which are known to have a huge problem of under-reported events. Further, they took a page from Big Pharma’s playbook by deliberately failing to gather data appropriately to reflect what was happening in reality.
  • MoH put up a Facebook post deriding all the “fake news” about side effects that was quickly flooded with thousands of comments from those who were harmed.
  • MoH apparently panicked and were ‘caught in the act’ of deleting hundreds if not thousands of comments by people reading the comments who took videos of them being deleted. There are currently 27,000 comments but it’s unknown how many were deleted.  ICAN just issued a FOIA request to the CDC for a VAERS report that seemingly disappeared without a trace about a two year old boy “began bleeding out of the mouth, eyes, nose and ears within 6 hours” after the Pfizer jab.
  • MoH never investigated why so many never got the 2nd dose, even though it cost them eligibility for the green pass and the right to work.
  • Israeli data played a starring role for the FDA advisory hearing on boosters, where they again assured the shots were extremely safe due to the fact they had received so few reports, even when the ones they did receive were determined not to be linked to the shots – including a woman who had a stroke immediately after the jab. 
  • The article then painstakingly goes through the important take-aways from the survey which shows high numbers being adversely affected, even requiring hospitalization, and had difficulty performing daily activities, developed neurological problems, experienced a worsening of symptoms in those with pre-existing autoimmune disorders, depression, or anxiety, disruptions to menstrual cycles, etc.
  • This chart shows the under reporting factor (URF) for four adverse events (if you can’t read it, go to top link of article): 
  • The results of this survey should have put an immediate end to government plans for boosters.
  • The article, through a chart, shows that a sizable percentage of adverse events began on the same day as the “vaccination,” but that those in charge who are denying any causality are engaged ‘in an exercise of ghoulish gaslighting,’ where they shouldn’t be able to sleep at night.
  • The survey doesn’t show the percentage of people who died within a month of being “vaccinated”
  • Based on v-safe data, the CDC reported an overall hospitalization rate within a week of the first dose of 0.1%, which was also the rate for people who received a booster and primary series all from Pfizer only.
    • 28% were unable to perform normal daily activities, or 22% of the ‘Pfizer only’ group (this compares to 29% in the MoH survey).
  • The article goes in-depth into numerous adverse events and it is worth your time to look at the charts.

TN House Health Subcommittee Hearing on Natural Immunity, Ivermectin, Patient Rights, and Rights to Prescribe and Fill

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/tn-health-subcommittee-hearing  Video Here

03/01/22 – 12:00 pm

TN – House Health Subcommittee Hearing

The Tennessee sub-committee on Health are hearing bills about natural immunity, ivermectin, patients rights, and doctor-pharmacists rights to prescribe and fill.

Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Richard Urso, and Dr. John Littell will be giving testimony to the bills.  Go to top link for videos.  (Only Cole and Urso speak in this particular video)

Image links to WWDNYK Studios page of FB where this is shadowbanned. If you’re on FB, please share across groups on the medium – and elsewhere.

The first video doesn’t start until 7:45, and the actual speakers don’t begin until 41:00. Each speaker has 3 minutes.  This is imperative information to know and educate other on.  Please listen!

  • Dr. Ryan Cole starts first with natural immunity. If you had COVID, you are recovered.  No vaccine needed.  There is no emergency any more.  We need to lift all mandates immediately.
  • Dr. Richard Urso then speaks at 45:00.  COVID “vaccine” manufacturers went out of their way to omit those with natural immunity.  The reason: those who have recovered from COVID are at risk for a hyperimmune response after “vaccination,” and some WILL DIE.  Big Pharma didn’t want that fact to be exposed so they eliminated the potential entirely.
    • Research from Israel show the double “vaxxed” are 27 times more likely to get reinfected with COVID
    • data from other countries show that the triple “vaxxed” are more likely to DIE
    • CDC data shows:
      • cases and hospitalizations increased 1,000% in the “vaxxed” following Omicron
      • Cases skyrocketed 2,400% in the boosted
      • Hospitalizations also increased in the “vaxxed” from 1.4 per 100,000 to 35.2 per 100,000
      • COVID deaths also increased in the “vaxxed”
      • While there was also a jump in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in the unvaccinated, the increase wasn’t as significant compared to the “vaxxed”
    • natural immunity is long, broad, and durable – 18 years later, those with SARS-Cov1 still had immunity.  Immunity is likely life-long
    • The “vaccinated” are producing more spike protein than those with natural immunity
    • A UK study on high risk children age 10-14 showed they were 52 times more likely to die if “vaccinated”, compared to infection from COVID
  • There is an excellent question and answer section where many issues are discussed and cleared up

For those who are still pro-COVID injections, and believe they somehow help at all, the most clarifying discussion happens at 1:12:08 when a representative, who is also a doctor, asks specifically about the “effectiveness” of the COVID injections, and the fact he has a problem entertaining the idea that they weren’t helpful at all.  The responses:

  • Dr. Cole states that whatever small benefit (0.345%) the injections had early on during the middle of an epidemic with a fast-moving virus is completely diminished by the fact natural immunity and early treatments, that are far more effective than “vaccines”, were completely neglected and suppressed
  • The VAERS data base shows that death and adverse reactions are the highest for COVID shots than for any other vaccine in the history of VAERS
  • Experimental models are showing COVID mRNA injections go into liver cells and reverse transcription is occurring
  • Adverse reactions appear to be dose related.  In other words, the more jabs, the more reactions
  • While we can all optimize our health and immune systems, once you get the injection, it appears it becomes a part of your genome and is with you forever
  • COVID injections are gene therapies.

Pfizer “Vaccine” Flops….Increased COVID in Young Kids Following “Vaccination”

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/pfizer-vaccine-flops-increased-covid?

Pfizer Vaccine Flops… Increased COVID-19 in Young Kids Following COVID-19 Vaccination

Pfizer’s vaccine in children 5 to 11 elicits antibodies (yawn) but only 11% efficacy one month after kids were “fully vaccinated”. After one month, vaxxed kids are MORE likely to have a COVID-19.

In a non-peer-reviewed report (par for the lame course), researchers report that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine has only 11% “vaccine effectiveness” in kids 5 to 11 in prevented COVID-19 diagnoses one month following vaccination with two doses.

The report is light on details of how COVID-19 diagnoses were determined, reporting only that they used “NAAT” or “antigen results” reported to the New York State Electronic Clinical Laboratory Reporting System (ECLRS).

The report does not provide any data on the number of cases that occurred in the ‘vaccinating’; i.e., those people who received a single dose but for various reasons were not jabbed with the second dose.

When the data are broken into ages of single years, it’s clear that the vaccine is not only a total flop for the younger age groups: if they keep tracking these kids, they will likely have negative efficacy (more likely to have a COVID-19 infection) before two months have passed following being vaccinated.

Here’s the data from the report as their Figure 1:

In their Figure 2, we see the data past two months does, indeed, show a higher risk of COVID-19 diagnosis via an incidence rate ratio of <1. Values of the incidence ratio above 1.0 imply positive effectiveness; values <1.0 imply negative efficacy):

The authors try to confuse the reader with the following nonsense:

“Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated.”

Baloney. If this is true for the last time point, then it’s true for all of the time points. And the trend clearly shows the result in the last time point is not spurious.

The authors try to assure that the vaccine prevents serious illness, in the youngest age group, but since massive questions remain on false positives from PCR tests (they do not report Ct distributions), and the role of comorbid conditions is known, and they study does not adjust for comorbid conditions, the claims of reduced hospitalization rates and lowered incidence of severe disease cannot be accepted.

If the report were peer-reviewed, these issues might have been brought up, and the world would not, once again, be being told nonsense as fact by public health.

The Daily Mail reported on this, but has a misleading headline about “efficacy”, failing to pick up on the seriousness of the less-than-one incidence rate ratio. Daily Mail also confuses “efficacy” (measured in prospective randomized clinical trials) with “effectiveness” (measured in observational population studies)

Nevertheless, they provided a quote from Dr. Cody Meissner that shows that any attempts to expand this vaccine into the younger age groups won’t be easy:

“’I think we need to rethink this whole program of vaccinated adolescents and children. What is our objective?’ Dr (sic) Cody Meissner, the chief of pediatrics at Tufts Children’s Hospital in Boston and a member of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, told DailyMail.com”

_________________

For more:

New FDA Chief Prioritizes Fighting ‘Misinformation’

https://news.yahoo.com/u-fda-chief-says-prioritize-215603641.html

New U.S. FDA chief says he will prioritize fighting misinformation

FILE PHOTO: FDA Commissioner nominee Califf testifies at nomination hearing in Washington
·2 min read

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Misinformation about science is increasingly prevalent and a significant public health threat that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will focus on fighting, incoming Commissioner Robert Califf said on Thursday.

Califf, who was sworn in on Thursday, did not specify any particular misinformation the FDA should fight, but millions of Americans still refuse COVID-19 vaccines, with many conservative media outlets and Republicans in the U.S. Congress spreading doubt about their effectiveness.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Unfortunately the ‘powers that be’ continue to use slight of hand tricks utilizing division to accomplish their goal of putting a needle in each and every arm come hell or high water.

Hopefully by now it is clear as day that these corrupt, powerful public health ‘authorities’ have severe conflicts of interest, direct ties to Big Pharma, and are now guilty of trying to stop free speechwhich is a bedrock of freedom, and crucial for true science.  People should also be free to disagree and make their own choices. Medical freedom is particularly precious as across the board, “one size fits all” medicine is fundamentally flawed due to not taking individual differences, medical history, and personally held beliefs into account.

The gigantic elephant in the room is these experimental, mandated injections (which aren’t vaccines), haven’t stopped transmission or infection. They have caused more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS, and have not had any measurable impact on COVID mortalityIn short, they don’t work.

Califf, age 70, was FDA commissioner under Obama and has been severely criticized for his response to the opioid crisis.  He previously worked as a Big Pharma consultant and has millions in pharmaceutical investments.  Nine out of the last 10 FDA commissioners went on to work for Big Pharma or serve on a prescription drug company’s board of directors.  The FDA is broken, has mislead the public, is a captured agency, and has has lost ALL credibility.

This emphasis on fighting ‘misinformation’ is all a ruse for censorship upon anything the ‘powers that be’ deem a threat to their vested interests and has nothing whatsoever to do with health or science.  True science evolves, where debate and disagreement is encouraged as new information is continually being added to the picture.

The Viral Delusion Docuseries

https://paradigmshift.uscreen.io/  Go Here for Trailer & Episode One for FREE when it debuts.

THE VIRAL DELUSION

The Tragic Pseudoscience of SARS-CoV2 & The Madness of Modern Virology

“Amazing. Should be translated into every language on the planet.” ~ Dr. Vicci Costa

The Untold Story Behind The Pandemic

The doctors, scientists and journalists featured in THE VIRAL DELUSION examine in detail the scientific papers that were used to justify the pandemic, and what they find is shattering. In this shocking, five-part, seven hour documentary series, they explode every single major claim, from the “isolation” of the virus to its so-called genetic sequencing, from the discovery of how to “test” for SARS-CoV2 to the emergence of “variants” that in reality, they explain, exist only on a computer. Their point: that the so-called SARS-CoV-2 virus exists only as a mental construct whose existence in the real world has been disproven by the science itself.

They then go back through history to reveal how the birth and growth of virology has led to massive misunderstanding and misdiagnosis of disease: from Smallpox to the Spanish Flu, Polio to AIDS, to COVID itself – putting the pandemic in a whole new context better understood not as settled science, but the tragic culmination of misunderstood biology by the growing cult of virology, built on pseudo-science, to which much of the rest of the medical profession defers without understanding or examination, and the tragic consequences that have been wrought in its name.

In 2019, the virologists took center stage, and for the first time on film, their methods, miscues and tragedy they have wrought are put under the spotlight, revealing the extraordinary leaps of fantasy buried in their methodology, the contradictions quietly acknowledged in their papers, their desperate effort to change language to justify their findings, the obvious incongruence of their conclusions and the extraordinary stakes for our entire society in whether we continue to blindly follow their lead into a full-scale war against nature itself.

Featuring: Andrew Kaufman, MD; Tom Cowan, MD; Stefan Lanka, Virologist; Torsten Engelbrecht, journalist; Claus Kohnlein, MD; Kevin Corbett, PhD RN; David Rasnick, Biochemist PhD; Mark Bailey, MD; Dawn Lester and David Parker, Authors; Stefan Scoglio, Biochemist PhD; Saeed Qureeshi, Chemist PhD; Celia Farber, Journalist; Harold Wallach, PhD; Pam Popper, PhD, ND; Charles Geshekter, PhD; Amanda Volmer ND, Jim West, Author; Larry Palevsky MD; and more.

  • Episode One:  Behind The Curtain of The Pandemic. The Pseudoscience of SARS-COV2
  • Episode Two:  Monkey Business. Polio, the Measles, and How It All Began…
  • Episode Three:  The Mask of Death: Smallpox, The Plague and The Spanish Flu
  • Episode Four:  AIDS – The Deadly Deception
  • Episode Five:  Genetic Sequencing The Virus That Isn’t There
See The Series. Share the wisdom of these brave and brilliant voices.

As scary as our times are, they are pregnant with possibility: the possibility for a wider understanding of our health and our politics, the possibility of working together to free ourselves from misguided medical authorities, disastrous heath protocols and the corruption and injustice that leads to poor access to healthy food, limited access to fresh clean water, dwindling opportunities to breathe fresh clean air, lives filled with extraordinary stress and the un-stopped toxification of our planet – the known causes of disease.

If you would like to organize a private screening, or to reach out, email us at mike@contagiousdelusions.com

Coming March 21, 2022

__________________

For more on the lack of viral isolation:

For the other side of the viral issue:

FYI: I do not claim to understand all of this.  It’s far above my pay-grade; however, I will state there is disagreement in the scientific community on the viral issue.  Regarding COVID, China’s chief epidemiologist is on record stating:

“They didn’t isolate the virus, and that is the problem.” ~ Dr. Wu Zunyou

One thing is for sure, something funny is clearly going on. Dr. Malone states it quite simply.