Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

COVID Vaccine – Genetic Reprogramming Without Informed Consent & Ronavax Roulette: All About the Adjuvants

https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/blog/reprogramming-of-cells-without-informed-consent/

WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE

 

WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE

Blockbuster conversation with Dr. Carrie Madej exposing the fact that the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-vaccine is experimental in nature, has not been properly tested in humans, has not been proven safe and effective- (she explains closely how the raw data has been manipulated), and raises many questions regarding dangerous side-effects and adverse events, including death, as well as pointing to the genetic reprogramming of human cells without informed consent provided to those who take it: this is a transhumanizing and nanobot-containing vaccine, but people do not seem to understand this; given the multiple numbers of adverse effects being reported, she calls for an immediate moratorium to halt the rollout and calls for medical professionals to speak out.

Watch on Bitchute

Numerous others have called for a moratorium to this dangerous shot but so far, nobody’s listening:

For an excellent article on how there are no completed clinical trials on the COVID-19 shot, and should you get vaccinated, you are actually a test subject in a drug trial:  https://theduran.com/what-vaccine-trials/

But more importantly:

THE DNA TEMPLATE DOES NOT COME DIRECTLY FROM AN ISOLATED VIRUS FROM AN INFECTED PERSON.
This brings us full-circle to the fact you can not have an effective vaccine or test without an isolated/purified virus.

click

https://www.activistpost.com/2021/01/ronavax-roulette-all-about-the-adjuvants.html

Ronavax Roulette:  All About the Adjuvants

JANUARY 22, 2021

By Julie Beal

The coronavirus vaccines are supposed to be ‘intelligent’, because they use novel adjuvants that can target the immune system in specific ways. On the other hand, many of them could cause immediate ‘hypersensitive’ reactions such as anaphylaxis or seizures, or what seems like a delayed reaction, i.e. one that results in an autoimmune disorder. An adjuvant (say ‘add-joov-unt’) is a substance that’s deliberately added to a vaccine to make you have a certain kind of immune response.

If a vaccine only contains an antigen (e.g. a virus), it doesn’t make people produce enough antibodies, so adjuvants are added to force a reaction and make it last longer:

Adjuvants may be molecules, compounds, or macromolecular complexes that boost the potency, quality, or longevity of specific immune responses to antigens, but which should cause minimal toxicity.

Note, in the quote above, they can only say ‘should’, because adjuvants are bad for the body – that’s the whole point of them. They’re supposed to make you react, but only a bit! So if you’re thinking, “Right, OK, so what are these things, and what will they do to me?”, the answer is, “It depends!”  This is partly because we’ve all got a different genetic make-up, and different kinds of microbes living inside us.  But it also depends on which vaccine we’re talking about, because every company makes its own special blend, so they’re all a bit different too.

“However!”  You can be empowered by learning about how genetic vaccines work, and how the reaction to a vaccine is linked to autoimmune disorders and the little bugs that live inside you! This means getting a bit ‘sciencey’, e.g. how the body works, and what microbes like bacteria and viruses actually do in the body, and maybe even what DNA is. All of this is well worth knowing, especially if you’re required to keep getting extra shots for the ‘health passports’ which are planned to be used globally.

An overview of the ronavax adjuvants

There are several new adjuvants being used in the coronavirus vaccines (or ‘ronavax’), sometimes in different combinations, and it’s all a bit bewildering, especially with all the strange names and stuff you’ve never heard of. So instead of trying to learn about the names of individual adjuvants, it’s easier and more helpful to think of them in terms of how they operate. To break it all down a bit, we’ll group them into these basic categories:

  1. Nanoparticles
  2. MRNA and DNA
  3. Genetic inserts
  4. Electroporation
  5. Aluminium
  6. Pretend bacteria (Lipid A and CPG ODNs)
  7. Xenobiotic chemical modifications
  8. Lipids

The old adjuvants, like mercury and thimerosol, have been largely abandoned, because the new ones are meant to be cleverer, and more desired for use in genetic vaccines. Some of the new adjuvants have been tested and some are already licensed in other vaccines, but on the whole, they’re still experimental, especially since they work in combination with the other parts of the vaccine, and yet few tests seem to be required or conducted for the ronavax. The Pfizer vaccine, for instance, contains mRNA, which in itself is an adjuvant, but so far they’ve only tested it on a few rats, because the World Health Organisation does not require further studies. This is in line with genetically engineered protein vaccines, for which tests of genotoxicity are not required.

Not only are the new adjuvants very powerful, they’ve also been largely omitted from the public conversation about coronavirus vaccines. They are now able to target specific parts of the immune system, so, like the genetic vaccines they’re added to, the adjuvants are considered smart or intelligent. (See link for article)

_______________________

**Comment**

This is very important information for Lyme/MSIDS patients to understand since many are suffering not only with multiple pathogenic infections but the blow-back they can cause such as a MCAS-like illness where the body essentially considers everything a threat – or allergen.  

When I attended the ILADS convention a while back I was surprised at the emphasis on MCAS (mast cell activation syndrome), since this was something neither my husband nor I experienced.  Since that time, I’ve been besieged by patients with this disorder (including my own daughter) and have had to learn about it.  A simple way to express it would be to understand that many patients with tick-borne illness (and many other chronic conditions) find themselves suddenly sensitive to nearly everything around them.  This can include certain foods, body products, WiFi, mold, and many, many other things they used to be able to handle.  

Please see:  

The following ingredients are listed in the AstraZeneca ronavax:  excipients and contaminants  histidine, sucrose, sodium chloride, magnesium chloride, Polysorbate 80, EDTA, ethanol and hydrochloric acid. But it might also contain bits of baby, because it’s grown in cells from an aborted foetus (same for the J&J vax).

The article points out a wide range of disorders could result from this shot such as:  anaphylaxis, arthritis, various types of myelitis, stroke, seizures, heart problems, pregnancy and birth problems, things that go wrong with the blood, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and, yes, even death.  Most of these have been detected already from those getting the jab.  While anaphylaxis would be immediate, many other disorders would take time to develop – perhaps leading to misdiagnosis and putting the blame on something other than the shot.  The author points out that any collateral damage from the shots will net a tidy profit for the pharmaceutical industry, so all’s well – except to those suffering.

For more on the shot:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

CDC Stops Reporting COVID Injection Side Effects & 12,400 People in Israel Test Positive After Shot

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-stops-reporting-on-experimental-covid-mrna-injection-side-effects/

CDC Stops Reporting on Experimental COVID mRNA Injection Side Effects

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has just released its weekly Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), and for the second week in a row, there is no new data on adverse reactions to the two FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) COVID mRNA injections.

The last report on the experimental injections and the adverse side effects was from January 6, 2021, and only covered the first week of injections with the experimental Pfizer COVID mRNA shots, with an emphasis on allergic reactions and anaphylaxis shock.

The report on January 6th did not cover the Moderna injections which have also received emergency use authorization by the FDA.

Injuries and deaths due to the experimental COVID injections are being reported in the U.S. and around the world, so why is the CDC not examining these adverse side effects and reporting on them?

The lack of reporting certainly cannot be blamed on the change in administrations, because an MMWR report was published this week …..

As of last week, fifty-five people in the United States have died after receiving a COVID-19 injection, 96 life-threatening events have been reported, as well as 24 permanent disabilities, 225 hospitalizations, and 1,388 emergency room visits.

(See link for article)

**Please also see** 

___________________________

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/thousands-of-israelis-tested-positive-for-coronavirus-after-first-vaccine-shot

12,400 People in Israel Tested Positive for Coronavirus AFTER Being Injected with the Experimental Pfizer COVID Shot

Jan. 20, 2021

A military nurse prepares to administers the coronavirus vaccine in Tel Aviv. Image source.

by Ido Efrati and Ronny Linder
Haaretz.com

Excerpts:

Over 12,400 Israeli residents have tested positive for COVID-19 after being vaccinated, among them 69 people who had already gotten the second dose, which began to be administered early last week, the Health Ministry reported.

This amounts to 6.6 percent of the 189,000 vaccinated people who took coronavirus tests after being vaccinated.

Some 2.15 million people have been vaccinated in Israel over the past month, of whom 300,000 have already gotten a second dose.

Read the full article at Haaretz.com.

______________________

**Comment*

For more:  

Many falsely believe decisions are being made with raw data.  Clinical trials are ongoing, so if you decide to submit to the experimental device (it’s not a vaccine) you are taking part in an experimental trial that has been fast-tracked, bypassing animal safety studies. There is little recourse if you are injured.

Please note the serious limitations of the ongoing vaccine trials:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/19/covidgate-the-corruption-of-clinical-trials-part-1/

  1. No one knows length of protection of the vaccine
  2. No one knows how this affects children as schools prepare to mandate the vaccine to obtain an education
  3. No one knows the synergistic effects of this vaccine with others
  4. No one knows the long-term effects of this vaccine
  5. The Pfizer clinical data is explained here: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/14/pfizer-covid-vaccine-frenzy-high-volume-of-adverse-reactions-expected/
  6. The Moderna trial is also being tested on those with a low risk of COVID
  7. ZERO trials were designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcomes (hospital admission, intensive care, or death)
  8. ZERO trials are designed to determine if they interrupt viral transmission
  9. Moderna’s trial lacks adequate statistical power to assess severe COVID-19 outcomes.  The reason?  Hospital admissions and deaths are too uncommon in the study population of 30,000 people
On top of all of this, experts are warning it can cause sterilization.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

WHO’s New PCR Rules Guarantee COVID Cases Will Drop Making it Look Like The ‘Vaccine’ is Working

The World Health Organization initiated new rules regarding the PCR assays used for testing for COVID-19.  The WHO previously recommended 45 amplification cycles to determine if someone was infected with COVID.  They now state:

“Careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.  Source.

It is widely known that anything over 30 cycles magnifies the samples so much that even insignificant viral DNA sequences end up showing up positive even if viral load is extremely low or the virus is inactive and poses no threat.

COVID PCR tests don’t detect a virus, but identify a piece of RNA presumed to be from a virus.
Also, PCR tests can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and infectious viruses.

Now, with the WHO’s lower PCR thresholds, it’s practically guaranteed that COVID “case” numbers will drop dramatically around the world.

We’ve been warned about this tinkering with cycles to give whatever message our ‘authorities’ want us to believe. Previously they need high case numbers to justify draconian lockdowns, so they instituted a high cycle threshold. Now they desperately need us to believe their lucrative vaccines are working so they need case numbers to drop – hence the lowered PCR cycles.

For more on PCR tests:

COVID-19 would barely be a blip on the radar screen if the WHO hadn’t changed the definition of a ‘pandemic’.

The WHO also eliminated the pre-COVID consensus that herd immunity could be achieved by allowing a virus to spread through a population, and insists that that it comes solely from vaccines.  

Hopefully their agenda is becoming crystal clear to everyone.

Category:

Activism, Testing, vaccines, Viruses

Lyme Disease Mimics Cellulitis Skin Infection

https://danielcameronmd.com/lyme-disease-mimics-cellulitis-skin-infection/

LYME DISEASE MIMICS CELLULITIS SKIN INFECTION

patient with lyme disease being examined for cellulitis

Lyme disease can mimic acute and chronic illness. In their article “Lyme Disease Mimics Postoperative Cellulitis,” the authors describe a patient who developed an abdominal rash, which was initially diagnosed as cellulitis, six days after a laparoscopic left salpingo-oophorectomy surgery. [1]

By

The 40-year-old woman, who developed redness, swelling, pain, and a rash at the excision site, was treated with cephalexin and later switched to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX).

“Over the next 24 hours, there was a rapid expansion of abdominal redness and patchy areas of redness on her left groin and her right forearm,” the authors write. The patient had complained of muscle and joint stiffness but attributed it to recent outdoor camping and exercise.

The woman was “admitted for postoperative cellulitis remote from surgery.” She was treated with doxycycline for possible Lyme disease, due to her recent camping trip and exposure to ticks.

Within hours of starting doxycycline, the patient’s “abdominal erythema [rash] significantly receded, the forearm and leg rashes resolved, and the joint pain and stiffness improved markedly.”

The Lyme disease diagnosis was confirmed with an IgM Western blot test.

“Initial suppression of the worsening rash could have been due to a low level of TMP/SMX activity on Borrelia burgdorferi stationary phase cells,” the authors explain.

The woman’s IgG Western blot test was negative.

Although Lyme disease can present with erythema migran rashes, early rashes can be confused with cellulitis. The authors suggest, “Lyme disease should be considered in patients with cellulitis in areas of endemic Lyme.”

Lyme disease rashes have been misidentified

Lyme disease rashes were misidentified in a case series involving 88 patients who presented with an erythema migrans (EM).  In 13 of these patients, the rash had been incorrectly identified or treated.

“Rashes were often misidentified by clinicians and patients as a spider bite, cellulitis, or shingles,” wrote Aucott and colleagues. [2]

The authors concluded, “Until more accurate tests are developed for early Lyme disease, cases without a diagnostic EM rash will need to be managed carefully.

In patients with cutaneous lesions where the differential diagnosis of cellulitis is not certain, empiric antibiotics should be chosen that will have activity against both Lyme disease and common agents of cellulitis.”

Editor’s note: I have prescribed cefuroxime or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid if Lyme disease is a consideration. Neither cephalexin nor TMP/SMX are effective against Lyme disease. If I believe Lyme disease is involved, I will treat patients longer than 7 to 10 days.  You can look at the rash yourself as the journal is open access.

Related Articles:

What does a Lyme disease rash look like?

How the incidence of an EM rash can be inflated

Single dose prophylactic treatment of a tick bite only prevents a Lyme rash

References:
  1. Miles S, Mansuria S. Lyme Disease Mimics Postoperative Cellulitis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. Nov 15 2020;doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.002
  2. Aucott J, Morrison C, Munoz B, Rowe PC, Schwarzwalder A, West SK. Diagnostic challenges of early Lyme disease: lessons from a community case series. BMC Infect Dis. Jun 1 2009;9:79. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-9-79

____________________

For more:  

Category:

Lyme, research, vaccines

Wisconsin Call to Action: Support SB 4 & SB 5: Prohibiting COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates By State & Local Health Officials & Employers

image001-1

SUPPORT SB 4 and SB 5: Prohibiting COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates by State and Local Health Officials and Employers

Dear Wisconsin NVIC Advocacy Team Members, 

Your action is needed to support two good bills that are scheduled for a hearing on Thursday, January 21st at 12:00 PM in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Children and Families in the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) Room on the 4th floor of the Wisconsin State Capitol.

SB 4 would prohibit the Department of Health and local health officials from mandating COVID-19 Vaccines and SB 5 would prohibit employers from mandating COVID-19 vaccines as a condition of employment. 

ACTION NEEDED:

  1. Attend the hearing on 1/21/2021 beginning at 12:00 PM in the GAR Room and offer testimony in support of SB 4 and SB 5. Due to compliance with social distancing guidelines, seating in GAR may be limited. Additional public access will be available in room 400 Northeast.
    Click for Agenda or Information on how to testify at a public hearing. 
  2. If you are unable to attend the hearing, you can send written testimony to Senator Andre Jacques, Chair of the Senate Committee on Human Services, Children and Families at Sen.Jacque@legis.wisconsin.gov.  Copies of your written testimony will be distributed to members of the committee.  
  3. Contact Members of the Senate Committee on Human Services, Children and Families and ask them to support SB 4 and SB 5.  See contact information and talking points below.  
  4. Contact your own Wisconsin State Senator and ask him/her to support SB 4 and SB 5.  If you do not know who your State Senator is, register/login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal at http://NVICAdvocacy.org.  Click on the STATE TEAMS tab and select your state. Their names are displayed on the right side of the page and you can click on their name for contact information. You can also search here.
  5. Sign up to get NVIC’s Wisconsin “Heads Up” text alerts by texting “Wisconsin” to 202-618-5488.
  6. Login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal OFTEN to check for updates and forward this email to family and friends.  Please ask them to register and share their concerns with their legislators as well. 

Senate Committee on Human Services, Children and Families Members:

André Jacques (Chair) – O – (608) 266-3512

Joan Ballweg (Vice-Chair) – O – (608) 266-0751

Eric Wimberger – O- (608) 266-5670

LaTonya Johnson – O – (608) 266-2500 – District Phone – (414) 313-1241

Melissa Agard – O – (608) 266-9170

Emails: 

Sen.Jacque@legis.wisconsin.gov, Sen.Ballweg@legis.wisconsin.gov, Sen.Wimberger@legis.wisconsin.gov, Sen.Johnson@legis.wisconsin.gov, Sen.Agard@legis.wisconsin.gov

TALKING POINTS: (please add your own experiences why these bills are important to you to customize your testimony)

  • SB 4 and SB 5 need to be passed to prevent COVID-19 vaccine mandates from denying law abiding citizens the ability to work or participate in society. 
  • COVID-19 vaccines carry the risk of injury and death for some so there has to be informed consent and the right to refuse the vaccine without penalty. As of 1/7/21, there have already been 6,758 COVID-19 Vaccine adverse events and 66 COVID-19 Vaccine deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.  
  • Some short-term and all long-term risks of new COVID-19 vaccines are still unknown.
  • A Wisconsin nursing home has already started laying off employees for refusing COVID-19 vaccines.  In other states, COVID-19 vaccine mandates in businesses,  local governments, and schools are already threatening the jobs and education of some. Wisconsin needs to get out ahead of these discriminatory practices.
  • The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission affirms the legal right of an employer to exclude the employee from the workplace even if an employee cannot get vaccinated for COVID-19 because of a disability or sincerely held religious belief and there is no reasonable accommodation possible. SB 5 will protect employees’ rights to delay or refuse COVID-19 vaccines. 
  • While the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) allows employees to decline Hepatitis B vaccines, and OSHA and many labor unions have expressed opposition to annual influenza vaccination policies that do not include religious and/or personal objection exemptions, there are no exceptions offered by OSHA for COVID-19 vaccine mandates in the workplace, so the only hope for those who don’t want the vaccine is to pass a state law preventing mandates.  
  • People injured by a COVID-19 vaccine have little recourse. Vaccine manufactures and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. This federal law establishes that the only option for compensation for COVID-19 vaccine victims is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP. No legal or medical expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. Vaccination must be voluntary.

Sincerely,

NVIC Advocacy Team
National Vaccine Information Center
http://NVIC.org and http://NVICAdvocacy.org
https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Members/ContactUs.aspx

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials.  We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register  at http://NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC. 

______________________

Watch Sharyl Attkison on Full Measure for an excellent 9 minute report on the “vaccine” mandate.

**Comment**

  • Experimental medical devices that are still in clinical trials are unproven. Pfizer‘s data will not be available until 24 months after study completion. Moderna’s data won’t come out for two years.  Oxford’s/AstraZeneca’s data won’t be available until the trail is complete. Russian Sputnik V vaccine has NO plans to share participant data.
  • Thousands of experts are warning against it.  Even Chinese experts call for its suspension.
  • Experts are stating it can cause sterilization.
  • Experts state it can destroy your immune system.
  • There have been thousands of severe adverse reactions and deaths already.
  • According to a doctor, if 6 billion get the vaccine, 167 million will be unable to work, perform daily activities, and will require care. Nothing is known about long-term effects.
  • 100% of vaccine recipients using the high dose vaccine had systemic side-effects.
  • Questions regarding the potential of chronic inflammation, mutations, DNA replication, autoimmune responses, cancer causing genes, pathogenic priming, unsafe epitopes, remain unanswered.
  • It doesn’t prevent transmission or infection.
  • Experts state mRNA goes into your genes, starts expressing itself, stimulating the immune system and that you can never get rid of it once it is in your body, making you a type of GMO.
  • Moderna admits it injects an operating system into your body.
  • Experts state the toxic metals within vaccines make our bodies into antennas with 5G.
  • Within it is a dye (Luciferace) showing who has been vaccinated, and stored in the Cloud.
  • Our medical ‘authorities’ and monitoring boards pushing it have severe conflicts of interest and stand to gain from the $30 billion per year vaccine business.
  • These same ‘authorities’ are thwarting efforts to track adverse reactions, have quietly renamed adverse reactions immune responses to quell vaccine hesitancy, have stopped counting cases of the flu to inflate COVID cases, and have been using faulty testing designed to be positive.  
  • Vaccine research is corrupted.
  • The CDC admits that few deaths are caused by COVID.
  • Scientists have demanded retraction of The Corman-Drosten foundation paper, the paper the entire house of cards is built upon.  They didn’t use a viral isolate and there are no controls. You need a viral isolate for accurate testing and an effective vaccine.
  • COVID-19 wouldn’t even be considered a ‘pandemic’ unless the WHO changed the definition.
  • There are numerous successful treatments for COVID.
  • Vaccine manufacturers have a blanket exemption from any liability & have nothing to lose.
  • The claim that “vaccines safe and effective” is meaningless; an individual risk-benefit analysis is required.  Vaccines are filled with toxic ingredients including aluminum and mercury.
  • There has never been research done on the synergistic effects and absence of studies into long-term effects of vaccinating according to the CDC’s schedule.

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses