Warnings of “vaccine” shedding were dismissed as “misinformation,” yet the following study proves conclusively that “vaccine” shedding is indeed very real and that mRNA is shed in breast milk affecting babies.

These data demonstrate for the first time to our knowledge the biodistribution of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA to mammary cells and the potential ability of tissue EVs to package the vaccine mRNA that can be transported to distant cells.

Little has been reported on lipid nanoparticle biodistribution and localization in human tissues after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

Despite that, the authors say the following, possibly to get their letter past the JAMA censors:

The sporadic presence and trace quantities of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA detected in EBM suggest that breastfeeding after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is safe, particularly beyond 48 hours after vaccination.

Your first reading of the above sentence might suggest that the authors said “COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is safe”. But it is ominously qualified with “particularly beyond 48 hours after vaccination”, plainly meaning that breastfeeding within 48 hours after vaccination is NOT safe.  Source

Notice that the article’s conclusion contradicts the data.

Go here for a great article on how to read scientific papers.

Researchers must now become expert wordsmiths to couch their findings in order to get their work published.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2796427

Research Letter
September 26, 2022

Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk

JAMA Pediatr. Published online September 26, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3581

Vaccination is a cornerstone in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the initial messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine clinical trials excluded several vulnerable groups, including young children and lactating individuals.1 The US Food and Drug Administration deferred the decision to authorize COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for infants younger than 6 months until more data are available because of the potential priming of the children’s immune responses that may alter their immunity.2 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends offering the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to breastfeeding individuals,3 although the possible passage of vaccine mRNAs in breast milk resulting in infants’ exposure at younger than 6 months was not investigated. This study investigated whether the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA can be detected in the expressed breast milk (EBM) of lactating individuals receiving the vaccination within 6 months after delivery.

https://rumble.com/v1i147t-naomi-wolf-lays-out-the-case-for-banning-covid-vaccines-for-pregnant-women.html  Video Here (Approx. 8 Min)

Naomi Wolf Lays Out The Case For Banning Covid Vaccines For Pregnant Women

Published August 30, 2022

Steve Bannon: (00:00)

I want to bring in another fighter Naomi Wolf.  So Naomi, in probably the most important midterm election since the civil war, you got all this news now with new boosters, you’re doing research. I think you guys have 35 reports. You’ve got the two companies suing, you got Moderna suing them. Walk us through where are we in all this and how they talk about new boosters, they’re suing each other. Uh, you’ve got you’ve guys are, come from these reports. You’ve got a new one on, on, I, I think, uh, men’s fertility, where do we stand with all this?

Dr. Naomi Wolf: (00:35)

It’s it’s almost difficult to keep up with the new findings that back up, what you know is my belief that, um, these, these injections are intended or have the effect that no one’s stopping, who should be stopping of harming the American people. And more and more evidence is emerging that the harms are to reproduction. Um, and that the harms are very specifically 360 degrees to women’s, uh, ability to reproduce effectively or successfully. Um, and since I even last spoke with you, there’s been even more really disturbing evidence that, that I’d like to share with your audience if I may. And I do think it’s so important because, you know, as we’ve seen just in the last two weeks, legacy news outlets like associated press and the spectator are willing to, uh, hammer an immediately corrected math error immediately publicly corrected math error that one of our volunteers made, but they’re misdirecting or redirecting their audiences in a very dangerous way. Uh, that is really a disservice to their audiences away from what is emerging in multiple places from multiple databases, including elsewhere in the Pfizer documents as terrifying evidence of massive harms to female reproduction. So Cameron said, I could walk you through two new data points, uh, from our reports. Is that possible?

Steve Bannon: (02:02)

Yes. Go ahead. Go ahead. Ma’am

Dr. Naomi Wolf: (02:04)

Thank you so much. So, uh, one of them is, uh, Denver should have a very scary image. Um, and I’d appreciate it if your producer would post it, if not you, there it is. Oh my God. So that is ladies and gentlemen, that is a pregnant woman’s placenta. Um, and I’m gonna read, uh, Dr. James Thorpe’s description. It’s his image from a presentation he gave. Um, this is an ultrasound image of a third trimester placenta in a pregnant woman who received the Pfizer vaccine eight weeks prior. This is a typical pattern that is commonly seen by him. About eight weeks post Pfizer vaccine, the white areas surrounding the placenta lobes, also known as codons represent calcifications from significant inflammation. Typically this finding may be associated with significant growth slowing of the fetus. That is the pre-born baby reduced amniotic fluid volume, abnormal, fetal, fetal surveillance testing.

(03:07)
And then he goes on to describe what fetal surveillance testing should be and should do. And then he says the large dark area in the placental lobe on the right may consistent with a blood clot. So again, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t know how many of you, you know, have been pregnant, had babies, your wives or partners have had babies, but that is not what a sonogram looks like. That’s not what a placenta that’s healthy and normal looks like. Those are terrifying, uh, unnatural irregular classifications that Dr. Thorpe explains are related to inflammation and over and over again, the, the science that our experts are finding and that other independent good researchers like Dr. Corey, Dr. Uh, Malone, Dr. McDonough are, are finding is that these, uh, materials in the vaccines cause inflammation. Um, so when I was reading the description, again, there’s less volume of amniotic fluid, which of course the baby needs in order to develop normally, and anecdotally what we’re hearing from nurses.

(04:14)
And I don’t, I am not ashamed. Uh, you know, as for 35 years covering women’s health, women’s sexual health, women’s reproductive health with two giant best sellers about obstetrics and gynecology and female sexual response. Um, you know, I actually know what I’m talking about when there’s a problem with women and women’s health, especially things that are hard to talk about, like giving birth or menstruating, or, you know, menopause. You first get the signal from women telling their stories among themselves. And you also first get the signal from nurses talking among themselves. So anecdotes are important. And what we’re hearing is that nurses are saying they are inducing labor early, uh, with vaccinated moms because the babies, um, cuz not safe, cuz the placenta are compromised. And remember over and over on this show, I would say the lipid nanoparticles are traversing. Every membrane in the human body, the placenta is a membrane.

(05:13)
The placenta is the most sacred, important membrane God gave us in order to reproduce our species. And how do you have a placenta that is not compromised if these industrial fats, these lipid nanoparticles coded with polyethylene glyco are designed to cross the placental barrier and remember again and again, and this is all over social media today. Um, spokespeople here in Britain, in Europe, we’re saying to pregnant women, go ahead and get the injection, get the mRNA vaccine. It cannot cross the placenta. It can’t hurt your developing baby. They were lying. They were either ignorant and, and, and inflicting their ignorance on defenseless mothers and their innocent witnesses. We

Steve Bannon: (05:57)

We’ve only got a couple we’ve only got a couple minutes and I got to have you back on tomorrow morning. This is that important, but I got to ask you, were they lying or you think they just, in your professional opinion, misread the data?

Dr. Naomi Wolf: (06:09)

Well, it’s, it’s impossible to misread the data. And um, you know, next time I come on, I’ll walk you through Dr. Chandler’s latest report, which shows that even Pfizer knew in their own records, that women were sustaining 75% of the adverse events and of those 16% were what Pfizer called reproductive disorders, female reproductive disorders. So Pfizer was lying. The FDA saw every one of these pages, the FDA was lying. And so everyone up and down the chain of command in our HHS and in our health system was lying to pregnant. Women. ACOG must have been lying. The, you know, the, the licensing boards, the gynecologist boards. So, um, I, there’s no way to mistreat the data. The data are clear that women are being hurt. Okay. They’re right here on my phone. They’re right there on dairy cup. They’re any place?

Steve Bannon: (06:58)

Hang on. We’re we’re we’re gonna have you back on the 10 o’clock show. We’re working your schedule. Just last thing. I’ve only got 30 seconds. They just booted out 22 cadets or mid shipment at the coast guard academy. I think today I think a few of those women, how is this in 30 seconds? How is this still going on? If, if, if this is so is this is so cut and dry Naomi Wolf,

Dr. Naomi Wolf: (07:19)

Well, you know my answer, but I’ll just keep saying it because everything I’ve told you all you know is true. Um, and if, if, if we ever make a mistake, we correct it immediately. But look at the massive 37 reports, they all are true. And what I’ve warned you about for months is true. It doesn’t make sense as medicine. It makes sense. As warfare, these female cadets are being targeted. Our military is being targeted. It is a, you know, these injections do things to, to the female 360 degree reproductive system that can’t

Steve Bannon: (07:52)

Done. Naomi, we’ll get it’s war. We’ll get to the bar. Give how did, how do people, how do people get to daily clout real quickly

Dr. Naomi Wolf: (08:00)

Go to DailyClout.io and you’ll see all 37 reports there. You’ll see the latest by Dr. Chandler showing this damage.

_________________

Pfizer Recategorized Miscarriages as “Recovered or Resolved” Adverse Events

For more:

https://rumble.com/v1gy22f-gates-funded-factory-breeds-30-million-mosquitos-per-week-for-release-in- Video Here  (Approx. 3 Min)

“The mosquitoes being produced in this factory carry bacteria called Wolbachia that block them from transmitting dengue and other viruses, such as Zika, chikungunya and yellow fever, to humans. By releasing them to reproduce with wild mosquitoes, they spread the bacteria, reducing virus transmission and protecting millions of people from illnesses.”

Article: https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Mosquito-Factory

Interestingly, these are the same viruses Ivermectin was shown to treat:
https://www.science.org/content/article/antiparasitic-drug-has-bonus-effect-mosquitoes
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564151/

Please read this on Wolbachia, which may not be as safe as thought:

___________________

https://www.wpr.org/box-200-mosquitoes-did-vaccinating-malaria-trial-thats-not-joke

A box of 200 mosquitoes did the vaccinating in this malaria trial. That’s not a joke!

By Max Barnhart
Published:   Wednesday, September 21, 2022, 8:59pm

One Seattle morning, Carolina Reid sat in a room with nine other volunteers, each waiting to take part in a clinical trial for a new, experimental malaria vaccine.

Reid’s turn came. She put her arm over a cardboard box filled with 200 mosquitoes and covered with a mesh that keeps them in but still lets them bite. “Literally a Chinese food takeout container” is how she remembers it. A scientist then covered her arm with a black cloth, because mosquitoes like to bite at night.

Then the feeding frenzy began.

“My whole forearm swelled and blistered,” says Reid. “My family was laughing, asking like, ‘why are you subjecting yourself to this?'” And she didn’t just do it once. She did it five times. (See link for article)

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • The insects deliver live malaria-causing parasites genetically modified to not make people sick
  • The body creates antibodies against the weakened parasite
  • They used mosquitoes rather than a needle to save money
  • The small trial of 26 people showed efficacy for a few months (each gets paid $4,100 to participate)
  • The researchers believe this approach could result in a vaccine more effective than the current GSK RTS,S vaccine which has an efficacy of 30-40%.
    • RTS,S targets only one out of more than 5,000 proteins the parasite produces
  • Countries curb malaria by using netting, insecticidal sprays, anti-malarial drugs, and by releasing GM mosquitoes that supposedly can’t bite or lay eggs.
  • Others have attempted to make a vaccine from disarmed parasites using CRISPR, despite scientists warning that GM bugs could be weaponized, and that there are real risks with genetic manipulation.
  • To test this approach, participants had to get another round of bites but this time containing the real malaria parasite
    • out of 14 exposed to malaria 7 contracted it showing the vaccine was only 50% effective.  Our of the other 7, the protection only lasted a few months.
    • those that contracted it were given a drug to clear the infection
Similarly to COVID, cheap, effective treatments for malaria already exist but aren’t nearly as sexy or lucrative as GM bugs

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-09-20-usda-air-dropping-vaccines-from-helicopters-across-13-states

USDA air dropping vaccines from helicopters across 13 states, using vaccine “bait” deemed HAZARDOUS if ingested

(Natural News) The USDA, like many federal agencies, is deeply invested in the business of extermination. For example, most people don’t realize that the USDA mass murders millions of birds every year through deliberate poisoning campaigns. Natural News has published the USDA’s list of bird extermination from 2009 (PDF), showing how the agency murdered over four million birds in 2009 alone.

That program is called “Bye Bye Blackbird,” and it’s just one of many mass extermination programs run by the USDA. Another program involves the USDA mass murdering foxes, coyotes, bears, mountain lions, bobcats and river otters. As Natural News reported in 2018:

According to the latest report, the federal program last year killed 357 gray wolves; 69,041 adult coyotes, plus an unknown number of coyote pups in 393 destroyed dens; 624,845 red-winged blackbirds; 552 black bears; 319 mountain lions; 1,001 bobcats; 675 river otters, including 587 killed “unintentionally”; 3,827 foxes, plus an unknown number of fox pups in 128 dens; and 23,646 beavers.

Also in 2018, the USDA was caught murdering hundreds of kittens in incineration ovens as part of a medical experimentation operation. As NaturalNews reported in 2018:

…[T]he USDA has been experimenting on kittens by feeding them parasite-riddled raw meat for two or three weeks so their feces can be collected. Then they are killed via incineration. And at the end of the “study,” Bishops says, the USDA admitted that the baby animals were healthy.

(See link for article)

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • Now the USDA is using a fleet of helicopters to drop rabies vaccines disguised as food flavored with fishmeal in the following 13 states:
    • Alabama
    • Maine
    • Pennsylvania
    • West Virginia
    • Virginia
    • Tennessee
  • This tasty morsel will also be eaten by many other wildlife animals – including pets
  • It doesn’t even bother to claim these vaccines are safe: see its Oral Rabies Vaccine and Bait Information page here.)
    • the Safety Data Sheet warns:  Potentially hazardous to health if any of the following should occur: Ingestion, parenteral inoculation, droplet or aerosol exposure of mucous membranes or if broken skin is exposed to infectious fluids or tissues.  That same warning sheet also says, “Localized skin lesions are possible” if exposed.

  • And of course, many of these “potentially hazardous” vaccines will wash into local waterways, which the safety sheet specifically warns against:  Do not allow undiluted product or large quantities of it to reach ground water, water course or sewage system.
  • Oh, and if you do find them, you are supposed to “Incinerate in EPA licensed Bio/Medical waste facility.”
But I’m sure “climate change” is to blame.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/09/16/chronic-active-toxoplasmosis

By Dr. Mercola

Sept. 16, 2022

Story at-a-glance

  • At least one third of all people on Earth are infected with the parasite Toxoplasma gondii, averaging from 11-20% in the United States to 50% and higher in some Western European countries
  • The parasite has been implicated in ocular issues, schizophrenia, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease and various other neurological disorders, as well as in heart disease, pneumonia, recurrent headaches, even cancer; it is also known for causing psychological changes in its hosts
  • While the official word is that most toxoplasma infections are harmless and asymptomatic, the impact of the parasite could be much more devastating than the current mainstream medical convention presumes; it may also be cross-reacting with the spike protein and possibly contributing to the mystery of “long COVID”
  • According to recent research and clinical evidence, toxoplasma tissue cysts, previously considered harmless in immunocompetent patients, are capable of causing major health issues without converting to the cell-blasting form
  • Commonly used antibody tests can only detect antibodies for the “tachyzoite” (cell-blasting) form of the parasite but not the “bradyzoite” (tissue cyst) form
  • Dr Uwe Auf der Straße in Germany has done an important clinical investigation of the parasite, and his findings could shed light on “mystery” symptoms in many patients

Toxoplasma gondii, an intracellular protozoan organism, is a very “successful” parasite with extremely diverse host base and sophisticated, almost diabolical, methods of survival and proliferation.

It is found worldwide and is capable of infecting most warm-blooded animals as intermediate hosts, including people. It has also been found in some cold-blooded animals, such as fish. Its final hosts, inside which the parasites can sexually reproduce, are felines, including domestic cats. In the environment, toxoplasma can be found in soil, water, and other substances that have come in contact with the parasite, such as fertilizers.

At the moment, the predominant medical opinion is that at least one third of all people on Earth are in some way infected with this parasite1,2 averaging from 11-20% in the United States to 50% or higher in a number of Western European countries, for example in Germany.3 In Germany, the frequency of positive Toxoplasma detection increases from about 20% in the group of 18-29 year-olds, up to 77% in the group of 70-79 year-olds and for over 79 year-olds the frequency is 84%.4

The commonly known infection routes for people are eating uncooked meat, drinking contaminated water, or accidentally ingesting the parasite after cleaning a cat litter box.

While the official word is that most infections are harmless and asymptomatic, the impact of the parasite could be much more devastating than the current mainstream medical convention gives it credit for.

A few physicians and researchers who have been looking into Toxoplasma are challenging the conventional view on several counts. And while a number of “bombshell” scientific works on the topic have been published, the new discoveries have not yet made their way into the everyday medical practice.

It is extremely important that more doctors and researchers look into this right now — especially given the fact that an encounter with the spike protein has been shown to amplify latent or slow-developing biological malfunctions in people, and thus it is possible that “spike protein assisted” Toxoplasma may be wreaking havoc in many unsuspecting patients and contributing significantly to the mysterious “long COVID” or its injection-induced manifestation.

Toxoplasma Life Cycle

With a degree of oversimplification, there are three main forms in which this parasite exists during different phases of its life cycle. They are known as oocysts (eggs), tachyzoites (the actively proliferating adult form), and bradyzoites (tissue cysts).

The sexual reproduction of Toxoplasma gondii occurs within feline hosts. The cycle starts when the host ingests oocysts (“eggs”) or eats an animal infected with bradyzoites (tissue cysts).

Upon ingestion of the cysts, their protective wall is dissolved by proteolytic enzymes in the stomach and small intestine to release bradyzoites. The free bradyzoites then penetrate epithelial cells lining the small intestine where they proliferate to form new generations that can undergo sexual and asexual cycles. Following fertilization of the female gametes, a wall starts to form around the oocysts. The oocysts are then released to the environment along with feces.

Depending on the environment, it usually takes several days for the oocysts in feces to become infectious. Infectious oocysts can survive for up to several years in soil etc., until they are ingested by an intermediate host. Once they are ingested, their protective shield is also dissolved by proteolytic enzymes thus releasing the eggs into the intestine of the intermediate host.

They then penetrate epithelial cells lining the small intestine where they undergo a form of asexual reproduction to form tachyzoites. The newly formed tachyzoites then spread and actively penetrate other cells of the intermediate host where they are surrounded by a parasitophorous vacuole protecting them from the hosts’ immune system.5

The interesting thing about the parasitophorous vacuole is that the parasite uses a part of the membrane of the invaded host cell’s to form it, with the purpose of “hiding” from the host’s immune system.6

From there tachyzoites disseminate throughout the body and reach immunologically protected sites including brain, retina and fetus. In vitro studies revealed that tachyzoites can invade astrocytes, microglia and neurons of the mouse brain with subsequent formation of tissue cysts within these cells.7,8,9,10,11

As they continue dividing, tachyzoites ultimately cause the cell to break, releasing as many as 32 tachyzoites that then infect new cells. However, that activity usually attracts the attention of the immune system, which ultimately slows down tachyzoite multiplication. In response, the tachyzoites convert into bradyzoites (tissue cysts).12

In doing so, they change their surface structure nearly completely, which is a “major factor in the parasite’s strategy of survival” since the host’s immune system identifies microorganisms according to their surface structure, and by modifying its surface structure, toxoplasma increases its chance of successfully tricking the host’s immune system.13,14,15

The tissue cysts are common in a number of body tissues and organs including the eyes, cardiac muscle, neural tissue, and various visceral organs where they can last for the hosts’ entire lifetime.16

Houston, We Have a Problem

The general medical consensus (challenged by a small group of doctor and researchers) is that while the most active form of Toxoplasma, known as “tachyzoites” (the one that multiplies very fast and blasts host cells), can cause significant health issues, predominantly in immunocompromised hosts, the tissue cyst form (“bradyzoites”) is mostly innocuous, and, once the parasite succumbs to the attack by the host’s immune system and retreats into its tissue cysts, it just quietly sits inside those intracellular cysts and does very little.

Per mainstream medial convention, the vulnerable demographics are immunocompromised patients who can succumb to acute toxoplasmosis and develop potentially lethal inflammation of the brain (or become victims of a “reactivation,” where tissue cysts convert back to the fast-proliferating form, to the same effect), and newly infected pregnant women.

However, recent research has shown that bradyzoites, the toxoplasma tissue cysts, are not innocuous at all, and that they do reproduce inside the cysts and can cause inflammation and other issues without converting to tachyzoites, including in otherwise immunocompetent patients.

What complicates the issue even further is that nearly all commercially available tests (antibody blood tests and even PCR tests), are specific to the cell-blasting tachyzoite form of toxoplasma and do not detect the presence of tissue cysts.

And if that is the case — we are looking at a potentially large number of people ailing from “chronic active toxoplasma” that cannot be diagnosed by any of the commonly used methods. As a result — especially given that toxoplasma loves living in the brain — their very real and possibly exhausting physical disease may be classified or psychosomatic or straight out psychiatric.

They could be suffering from slow-developing brain inflammation, autism-like symptoms, dementia-like symptoms, or even pulmonary and heart issues — and the doctors might not even be looking in the direction of toxoplasma or ruling it out, based on negative antibodies.

(In its active form, the parasite has been implicated in ocular issues,17 heart disease,18 pneumonia,19 recurrent headaches,20,21 even cancer22 — as well as in addiction, schizophrenia, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, and various neurological disorders.23,24,25 And even in its latent form, it is believed to cause psychological changes in its hosts, ranging from entrepreneurial26 to suicidal tendencies.27

Among the researchers doing groundbreaking research in Toxoplasma are Dr. Jaroslav Flegr in the Czech Republic, Dr. Robert Yolken and Dr. Vernon Carruthers in the U.S., Dr Uwe Auf der Straße in Germany, and others.

The Work of Dr. Uwe Auf der Straße in Germany

Dr Uwe Auf der Straße is a GP in Germany and the author of the book titled, “Shadow Disease Chronic Active Toxoplasmosis.”28 Here is what he has to say about the “limits of our current laboratory medicine”:

“The current medical opinion is still that a negative IgM excludes an active toxoplasmosis and thus the need of a therapy. Due to research having hinted repeatedly of a significant effect of bradyzoite activity, and due to my own observations, I definitely cannot agree with that.

Tests only react to tachyzoite-specific antibodies and the sensitivity of a standard test system in case of an initial infection is only 81.8%.29 Basic research has done further substantial work which questions the accuracy of Toxoplasma antibody assays.

‘The currently available solid phase immunoassays were developed in the 1970’s to detect strains which were circulating at that time and there are strong indications, that … standard assays may substantially underestimate the prevalence of Toxoplasma infection in a population and its effect on health and disease.’30

Further it has been proven that, in cases of a Toxoplasma infection, tachyzoite–specific IgG, IgM and even PCR can render negative results.31,32,33

In a chronic active course of the disease, reliability of our currently used lab methods has not been proven and these are most likely not suitable to detect Bradyzoites or their activity, let alone the cyst burden.

Research still focuses predominantly on acute rather than chronic toxoplasmosis and it is only a general assumption, that cases with chronically active courses of the disease as presented here could be diagnosed by using the usual antibody assays – to my knowledge this has never been proven.

The number of Toxoplasma carriers without detectable tachyzoites antibodies, who can potentially become ill from a chronic active toxoplasmosis based on an increased activity within the cysts is unclear.

From my observations it can be assumed that the number is significant, otherwise there would not appear so many younger patients in my case collection (about 40%), who suffer from a chronic active toxoplasmosis without any detectable tachyzoite antibodies.

If the immune system ceases to produce Tachyzoite antibodies after some years, the disease will no longer be detectable in the blood. This does not mean that the Toxoplasma in the cysts are inactive.

There are numerous indications that an increased activity in the cysts can trigger a symptomatic illness, since, contrary to older assumptions, bradyzoites do not rest, but can be active and can reproduce and cause illness. This refers to the findings of Fergusson et al. (1989), McLeod et al. (2008) and Watts et al (2015).”34,35,36

Dr. Uwe Auf der Straße has observed that there was no significant difference in observed symptoms between his patients with positive antibody tests and his patients with negative antibody tests in whom he suspected chronic active toxoplasmosis, based on the preliminary diagnostic method he developed and ruling out other illnesses that can produce similar symptoms. (He also took into consideration their positive reaction to toxoplasma therapy.)

“I am convinced that a significant activity within the cysts, predominantly of the bradyzoites, is the decisive reason for the illness in both groups of patients who all have inconspicuous IgM values with regards to tachyzoites, and whose IgG values, if indeed there are any, don’t show any direct correlation to the severity of the illness.

The clinical pictures in both groups are identical, and the toxoplasmosis therapy is even more effective in group B [negative antibody tests]. The bradyzoites, the activity of which we cannot measure, are currently underrated strongly, and our established laboratory values produce only a pretended security.

It is difficult to develop reliable bradyzoite-specific tests, since bradyzoites reveal themselves only rarely to the immune system and only lead to a limited antibody production.”37

“Thankfully, basic research has begun to address this problem, and there are new and promising methods being developed, with the aim of getting a grip on this problem and reveal hitherto not detectable toxoplasma presence and even to determine the cyst burden.”38

Toxoplasma and the Mind

According to Kathleen McAuliffe, author of the book “This Is Your Brain on Parasites,”39 researchers have noticed a strong correlation between toxoplasma infection and schizophrenia and other mental disorders in humans. She also notes studies where anti-psychotic drugs inhibited toxoplasma in vitro.

In fact, the mind-controlling ability is Toxoplasma’s “trademark.” I wrote about it earlier in the article titled, “Don’t Underestimate Mind-Controlling Parasites.”

To quote Dr. Uwe Auf der Straße again, whose book I can’t recommend enough, “symptoms comprise an increased risk for the occurrence of schizophrenia40,41,42,43 psychoses44 or aggressive behaviour, also a doubling of the risk for accidents in cases where Toxoplasma antibodies have been detected.45

Explanations for that may point to the mentioned behavioural changes and the decreasing psychomotor resilience46 due to Toxoplasma infections. It is scary that even an increase in the number of attempted suicides has been correlated with antibody detection in toxoplasmosis.”47,48

“It fits this bill that toxoplasmosis infected rats are known to lose all fear of cats. They literally seek them out in broad daylight, to be eaten in the end, a behaviour that is very advantageous for the spreading of Toxoplasma, but not so good for the rat. The consequence is clear.

When the host is ‘ripe’ and contains many bradyzoite – cysts, it is simply more useful for the parasite when dead instead of alive, particularly if the death is caused by a cat. Death by car accident or suicide are thus somehow “inappropriate”, but can be regarded as a somewhat macabre continuation of such behavioural disturbances in the present.”

Many Tricks of Toxoplasma

The tricks of this parasite are endless. For example, it knows how to hijack the host’s macrophages — and instead of being destroyed by a macrophage,49 take over it and use it as a temporary home to transform into the active form and then use it as a cab to travel around the host’s body!

According to the accepted view, the release of actual “eggs” from the ingested oocysts into the host’s system happens due to the processes in the host’s digestive system. However, a study came out showing that the process can happen in the absence of digestive factors, and that the parasite can not only survive but also transform into its most active form inside macrophages, after being “eaten”:

“Our results show that the oocyst internalization kinetics can vary among a given population of macrophages, but similar processes and dynamics could be observed. Most of the cells manipulate oocysts for ~15 min before internalizing them in typically 30 min … Liberated sporozoites within macrophages then differentiate into tachyzoites within 4-6 h following oocyst-macrophage contact.”

Another paper, titled, “Inhibition of nitric oxide production of activated mice peritoneal macrophages is independent of the Toxoplasma gondii strain,” shows that Toxoplasma is capable of inhibiting nitric oxide production. Nitric oxide, that plays an important role in immune response50,51 and is frequently mentioned in the context of COVID.

It’s an “enzyme that is expressed in activated macrophages, generates nitric oxide (NO) from the amino acid L-arginine, and thereby contributes to the control of replication or killing of intracellular microbial pathogens.”52

The overall mechanism that the parasite uses to invade host cells is beyond of the scope of this article but if you are curious, you can check out the paper titled, “How does Toxoplasma gondii invade host cells?” If you want to learn more about how it modulates host cell’s responses, there is another technical paper titled, “Toxoplasma gondii Modulates the Host Cell Responses: An Overview of Apoptosis Pathways.”

And if you want to learn more about Toxoplasma and brain blood barrier, you can read this paper, “Toxoplasma gondii and the blood-brain barrier.”

Toxoplasma and the Spike Protein: A Possible Connection?

According to Dr. Uwe Auf der Straße, a patient could be potentially simultaneously infected with Toxoplasma and with one or more other pathogens, some of the them kicking in as opportunistic infections.

In that case, the clinical picture may be even more confusing, and the condition of the patient may be more severe, even though Toxoplasma is capable of causing enough trouble if it manages to sufficiently proliferate — whether in its active form or inside the tissue cysts — all on its own.

Dr. Uwe Auf der Straße’s book was published in 2019, so there is nothing about COVID in the book — but it is not illogical to presume that when a person with latent or relatively slowly developing Toxoplasma encounters the spike protein, whether it’s from infection or from the COVID injection, it may create a “perfect storm” and kick Toxoplasma in high gear, creating debilitating and/or mysterious symptoms, resulting in vaccine injury or “long COVID.”53

If the percentage of people with chronic active Toxoplasma is as high as Dr. Uwe Auf der Straße suspects, it is also not illogical to assume that due to the deficiencies in the current diagnostic standards and tools, a lot of people suffering from chronic active Toxoplasma may not be properly diagnosed, and their maladies may be attributed to psychosomatic factors or remain a medical mystery.

An additional complication is that “atypical mixed forms of the known Toxoplasma strains, which are significantly more aggressive than the previously known Toxoplasma strains have been detected in Germany, and this might happen worldwide.”54,55,56

Anecdotally, per Dr. Uwe Auf der Straße, patients with chronic active toxoplasma could experience increased irritability where they “blow up” out of nowhere even though they realize that there is no good reason and don’t feel good about being so irritable — as well as anxiety or depression, with men more prone to irritability, and women more prone to anxiety and depression.

At the same time, also anecdotally, increased irritability has been observed in some recipients of the COVID injection. And while there can be lots of factors causing mood changes, it could be something to look into.

Curiously, there is an overlap between the list of natural remedies that have been studied as potentially treatments against toxoplasma and showed improvements — and the list of “alternative” COVID and “long COVID” treatments.57,58,59,60 Due to the tremendous complexity of the issue and the fact that myriads of factors impact our immune response and reactions to treatments, further investigation of the correlation by honest and curious is urgently needed.

Conventional toxoplasma treatments are considered effective in treating tachyzoites but there is no known conventional treatment for the tissue cyst form.61

Better Diagnostics: Some Hope

According to Dr Uwe Auf der Straße, in his practice, he found one particular testing method to be more reliable than the conventional ones:

“The Lymphocyte-Transformation-Test (LTT) has made my work on Toxoplasmosis easier in the last months, but is not (yet) used for the diagnose of toxoplasmosis on a wider scale. By means of this test, we can detect activity of our immune system’s T-lymphocytes, which react specifically towards certain pathogens.

While the immune system is dealing with certain pathogens, T-lymphocytes become specifically reactive to this pathogen, and the intensity of this reactivity can be measured pathogen-specifically.”

“This is measurable for about 4 weeks, and thus the LTT mirrors the current activity of pathogens. A more than threefold elevated stimulating index (SI) indicates, that specific T-cells are present in the blood and thus an active confrontation of the immune system and the tested germ takes place.

A validation concerning chronic active toxoplasmosis has not yet been performed, but according to both Dr. Hopf-Seidel and my own experiences with patients suffering from a chronic active toxoplasmosis, it is most likely more sensitive than the Toxoplasma IgM.”

Dr Uwe Auf der Straße also speaks highly of the work of Dr. Yolken’s team:

“I consider a new approach of the scientific group led by Professor Yolken in Baltimore to be promising. A paper on this approach has been published in June, 2018.62 The scientists used a known detection method (a Western blot test) for the detection of Toxoplasma proteins, which also give proof of the presence of Toxoplasma.

Of 25 patients, who were suffering from severe psychic disorders, 3 patients (8.2%) were diagnosed as positive with Toxoplasma IgG. Four times as many, 12 patients (35.3%) were then diagnosed with Toxoplasma by detection of Toxoplasma protein in their blood.

The detection of these proteins seems to offer a significantly more sensitive method to diagnose toxoplasmosis than the usual available antibody tests. Until this can be used as a routine procedure, the tests will have to be examined in further studies.”

“The same group of scientists is currently developing another highly-sensitive method, which can detect Toxoplasma cysts in every stage of the disease. This concerns the MAG1 antigen, which occurs in great numbers inside the bradyzoite cysts and in their outer membrane. Antibodies which are directed against this MAG1 antigen can be detected in the laboratory.

The scientist could prove in mice that the amount of MAG1 antibodies detectable in the blood showed a significant correlation to the amount of bradyzoite cysts inside the brain. It was also shown that in case of negative MAG1 antibody detection, no bradyzoite cysts were found.

This marker could possibly be used as a scale for a chronic infection and for the burden with bradyzoite cysts in the future. This would be a huge step for laboratory diagnostics and for affected patients even more so.”

“Another approach is that clues for a disturbed metabolism in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) are being investigated intensively. In 2016 it was proven that CFS patients share anomalies in 20 metabolic pathways of their mitochondria.63 One might picture mitochondria best as our cells’ power plants.

The intensity of the illness in CFS patients negatively impacts the activity of the metabolic pathways and the quantity of metabolites, which result from the mitochondria’s work. This “shutdown” of the metabolism has been interpreted as a shifting of the mitochondrial metabolism into “survival mode.”

Toxoplasma can also very severely affect the mitochondria,64 and the intensity of affliction is probably related to the strain of Toxoplasma which has infected the patient.65 It would be of utmost interest if the deviations in mitochondria metabolism during a chronic active toxoplasmosis might resemble those detected in ME/CFS patients, as there is strong overlap in the symptoms of both diseases. They might even be identical in some cases.”

Conclusion

It is possible that due to imperfect diagnostics and insufficient understanding of this parasite in the medical community, a lot of people with chronic active toxoplasma remain undiagnosed or diagnosed incorrectly, and suffer profoundly from the lack of proper treatment.

It is also possible that Toxoplasma is a significant factor, contributing to complications from spike protein toxicity. I believe that understanding this issue is important. It requires time and attention of researchers and doctors, and my prayer is for solid knowledge to come, and for the “mystery” suffering to end.

About the Author

To find more of Tessa Lena’s work, be sure to check out her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.

___________________

For more:

Toxoplasmosis causes many mental issues and psychiatrist E. Fuller Torry believes that 75% of schizophrenia is associated with infections, with Toxo a significant portion.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/05/21/toxoplasmosis/

**UPDATE*

57 top scientists and doctors have also just issued a report calling for a stop on all COVID injections:  60a5ff1fd9f50f42f696aec6_23 Fifty Seven Top Scientists and Doctors

https://thenewamerican.com/live-wcfh-covid-2022/  Video Here

Speaking from London on September 27, Consultant Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, once a proponent of Covid vaccination, now presents findings that have convinced him that the mRNA vaccination campaign should be halted.

“There has been a rise in out of hospital cardiac arrests and heart attacks linked to Pfizer’s Covid-19 mRNA vaccine with plausible biological mechanisms of harm,” Dr. Malhotra said, according to a press release from the World Council for Health.

Moreover, Dr. Malhotra said, “Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.”

Dr. Malhotra’s findings have been published in The Journal of Insulin Resistance. In the paper, Dr. Malhotra notes that there has been “a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England” in 2021 and that “similar data” was found in Israel “in the 16-39-year-old age group.

Additionally, he found that “in the non-elderly population the “number needed to treat” to prevent a single death runs into the thousands.” He concludes: “It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.”

Dr. Malhotra’s findings have been released to international acclaim.

“Dr. Aseem Malhotra has written detailed narrative review of the literature on the uses and abuses of the mRNA covid vaccines,” said Stanford University professor of medicine and epidemiology Jay Bhattarcharya.

“These papers should be considered carefully by all public health authorities who seek to adopt principles of evidence-based medicine in their recommendations to the public regarding the covid mRNA vaccines,” Bhattarcharya continued.

Sherif Sultan, Professor of vascular surgery and President of the International vascular society also emphasized the importance of Malhotra’s work.

“These findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side effects and underscore the established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals,” Sultan said.Sultan concluded:

“Doctor Aseem Malhotra’s literature review and analysis is a cause for global concern.”
Leading scientists say the paper is important.

He also wrote “Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Through Read Evidence-Based Medicine” Part 1 and Part 2.

http://  Approx. 4 Min

Sept. 26, 2022

Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID Injections

This 11 minute interview with Dr. Malhotra also discusses his paper but in the beginning of the video he states some very important things:

“You need to understand that the current system is encouraging good people to do bad things. And the root of this problem are big, very powerful corporations that have too much influence on government, on health care, on media, and their primary responsibility is to produce profit for their shareholders, not to give you the best treatment….these corporations, unfortunately, and the way that they go about their business, by misleading people, by their business model being fraud, they act like psychopaths, and they are a psychopathic entity….the conclusion is that we have a psychopathic entity influencing health policy, and that needs to stop and it needs to stop now. ~ Dr. Aseem Malhotra

Paul Offit, a Top “Vaccine” Expert is Warning Healthy Young People to Not Get the COVID Booster.

http://  Approx. 24 min

Sept. 22, 2022

Dr. Vinay Prasad goes over a Lancet study that looks at myocarditis in young people 90 days after onset after the mRNA COVID shots.

For more:

http://

Sept. 19. 2022

Another safe, effective, cheap drug effective against COVID yet highly censored and maligned is ivermectin.  Mikki Willis, creator of the Plandemic series, recently created a 14 minute documentary on the effectiveness of ivermectin and the sordid backstory.
____________________
The ‘powers that be’ have chosen ineffective and toxic remdesivir to be given in hospitals, which have become the modern day killing fields.  Now, a group of attorneys are suing hospitals who capitulated due to the CARES Act which gives kick backs to hospitals for using the drug and ventilation (which also didn’t work but caused great harm), as well as mandating the experimental mRNA gene therapy injection for all their employees.

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/how-a-false-hydroxychloroquine-narrative

How a false hydroxychloroquine narrative was created, and much more

This is the most important article I ever wrote, because it cracks open the plandemic nut. Perhaps more appropriate, it lances the pandemic boil so all can see/smell the putridness inside.

I began writing on this subject on my blog in May 2020 and kept adding items. Because I only had 1,000 subscribers when I posted it to Substack in March, I am posting it again for the other 12,000 plus.

It is remarkable that a large series of events taking place over the past months produced a unified message about hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and produced similar policies about the drug in the US, Canada, Australia, NZ and western Europe.  The message is that generic, inexpensive hydroxychloroquine (costing only $1.00 to produce a full course) is dangerous and should not be used to treat a potentially fatal disease, Covid-19, for which there are no (other) reliable treatments.

Hydroxychloroquine has been used safely for 65 years in many millions of patients.  And so the message was crafted that the drug is safe for its other uses, but dangerous when used for Covid-19.  It doesn’t make sense, but it seems to have worked.

In the US, “Never Trump” morphed into “Never Hydroxychloroquine,” and the result for the pandemic is “Never Over.”  But while anti-Trump spin is what characterized suppression strategies in the US, the frauds perpetrated about hydroxychloroquine and the pandemic include most western countries.

Why do I say “Never Over”?  I am expanding on this claim with a), b), c) on August 30. Later in the paper additional evidence is provided.

a) Because if people were treated with HCQ at the onset of their illness, over 99% would quickly resolve the infection, avoiding progression to the late stage disease characterized by cytokine storm, thrombophilia and organ failure. Despite claims to the contrary, this treatment is very safe.  (Yet outpatient treatment is banned in many US states.) UPDATE Jan 15: The CDC forgot to rewrite its guidance on malaria and hydroxychloroquine during Covid.  CDC says hydroxychloroquine “can be safely taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers”  Only “when it is used at higher doses for many years, a rare eye condition called retinopathy has occurred.

b) If people were treated prophylactically with this drug (using only 2 tablets weekly) as is done in some areas and in some occupational groups in India, there would probably be at least 50% fewer cases after exposure. (Such treatment is currently banned in much of the US, including in my state of Maine.)

c) Protocols for in-hospital treatment (that were unknown during the initial peak of illness in the US and Europe) using HCQ and individually selected blood thinners, steroids, vitamins, zinc and other drugs such as used at NYU, have significantly reduced mortality of the very small number of people who might still progress to a serious illness. (The FDA, however, recommends against the use of HCQ outside of clinical trials, and the CDC and NIH recommend against it.)

If we followed a), b) and c) the result would be much briefer periods of infectiousness, lower viral loads, less severe illness and considerably less transmission.  The R zero (average number of people each case infects) would drop below one and the pandemic would soon die out.

Were acts to suppress the use of HCQ carefully orchestrated?  You decide.

Might these events have been planned to keep the pandemic going?  To sell expensive drugs and vaccines to a captive population?   Could these acts result in prolonged economic and social hardship, eventually transferring wealth from the middle class to the very rich?  Are these events evidence of a conspiracy?

Here is a list of what happened, in no special order. Please help add to this list if you know of other actions I should include.  This will be a living document, added to as new information becomes available.

I have penned this as if it is the “To Do” list of items to be accomplished by those who pull the strings.  The items on the list have already been carried out.  One wonders what else might be on their list, yet to be carried out, for this pandemic.  (See link for article)


**Comment**

Dr. Nass goes through the COVID debacle step by step on how the ‘powers that be’ suppressed cheap, effective, safe COVID treatments so the public appeared to have no choice but to submit to an experimental gene therapy never before used in humans.  It worked.  The indoctrination is complete and the division has never been greater.

She also goes through the fraudulent studies being used to this day to malign these treatments.  All the studies are fundamentally flawed and designed for a pre-determined outcome. She goes through crazy examples being used to paint treatments as dangerous (one guy used HCQ in the form of fish tank cleaner and subsequently died).  She demonstrates the complicity of medical journals who simply rode out controversy but never admitted fault, but further served to muddy the waters.  Then, journals didn’t tell the media that data were fabricated and the study fraudulent, which further propagated the lie.

She demonstrates how federal agencies like the FDA and CDC:
  • march in lockstep by making unsubstantiated and false claims (often based upon models), and restricting the use of these treatments to clinical trials which are virtually impossible to enroll in or use excessive doses
  • avoid funding clinical trails to test drug combinations like HCQ with zinc, azithromycin, or with both
  • create a NIH Guidelines committee for Covid treatment recommendations, in which 16 members have or had financial entanglements with Gilead, maker of Remdesivir, whom were appointed by the Co-Chairs.  Two of the three Co-Chairs are also financially entangled with Gilead.  The NIH treatment guidelines summary cherry picks the literature to claim HCQ provides no benefit.
  • frighten doctors so they don’t prescribe hydroxychloroquine, because prescribing outside the new NIH “standard of care” leaves them open to both malpractice lawsuits and potential loss of license.  This should ring a bell with Lyme/MSIDS patients as this has been done in Lymeland for over 40 years.
  • suddenly, and without precedent, require lab monitoring when using HCQ making it hard to use in outpatients.
  • use the WHO to pressure governments & professional societies to stop doctors from using HCQ
  • convince the public that COVID will be long-lasting
  • prevent COVID tests from other countries and fail to produce a valid test making it impossible to track anything
  • lie about COVID severity when it mattered
  • destroy the reputation of respected doctors who stood in their way
  • collude with social media to ban content that doesn’t agree with their accepted narrative
  • stop manufacturers from supplying the drug and turn them into surveillance/enforcement arms by having them collect information on all off-label use of hydroxychloroquine in New Zealand and Australia
  • attempt to retract published papers that provide evidence to support use of HCQ for COVID
  • have ‘bought’ scientists conceal their financial conflicts of interest in their HCQ clinical trials and publications as well as in the guidelines they produce
  • get their experimental, unlicensed drugs tested, much more expeditiously and cheaply than under ordinary circumstances, on Covid patients in large clinical trials
  • have a research organization with big Pharma members (A.O.K.I.) pressure the Russian Ministry of Health to remove HCQ from its treatment guidelines
  • stop the use of HCQ due to a fabricated study in countries with high COVID mortality
  • get state Pharmacy Boards to refuse to dispense HCQ outside of clinical trials
  • again collude with social media and mainstream media to ban and malign doctors giving a press conference about HCQ and then ban comments about the ban. Take down the doctor’s website as well.
  • have Dr. Fauci discredit published observational studies that show benefit using HCQ
  • censure and oust a state legislator because she credited HCQ for saving her life
  • cause articles favorable to HCQ to disappear.  Here is a brief description of the article:
    • Prodromos et al., Preprint, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.29781.65765 (meta analysis)  Hydroxychloroquine is Effective and Safe for the Treatment of COVID-19, and May be Universally Effective When Used Early Before Hospitalization: A Systematic Review  Meta analysis of 41 studies concluding: “HCQ has been shown to have consistent clinical efficacy for COVID-19 when it is used early in the outpatient setting, and in general would appear to work better the earlier it is used. Overall HCQ is effective against COVID-19. There is no credible evidence that HCQ results in worsening of COVID-19. HCQ has been shown to be safe for the treatment of COVID-19 when responsibly used.”
  • blame the pandemic on humans damaging nature and climate change: Cell, in the final paragraph, on September 3 by Fauci and Morens:

“The COVID-19 pandemic is yet another reminder, added to the rapidly growing archive of historical reminders, that in a human-dominated world, in which our human activities represent aggressive, damaging, and unbalanced interactions with nature, we will increasingly provoke new disease emergencesWe remain at risk for the foreseeable future. COVID-19 is among the most vivid wake-up calls in over a century. It should force us to begin to think in earnest and collectively about living in more thoughtful and creative harmony with nature, even as we plan for nature’s inevitable, and always unexpected, surprises.”

  • attempt to expunge official info that HCQ is safe but forget to remove malaria treatment guidance which still tells the truth but might disappear shortly:  CDC’s guidance states,

Who can take hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine can be prescribed to adults and children of all ages. It can also be safely taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers.

What are the potential side effects of hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine is a relatively well tolerated medicine. The most common adverse reactions reported are stomach pain, nausea, vomiting, and headache. These side effects can often be lessened by taking hydroxychloroquine with food. Hydroxychloroquine may also cause itching in some people. All medicines may have some side effects. Minor side effects such as nausea, occasional vomiting, or diarrhea usually do not require stopping the antimalarial drug. If you cannot tolerate your antimalarial drug, see your health care provider; other antimalarial drugs are available. 

How long is it safe to use hydroxychloroquine? CDC has no limits on the use of hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of malaria. When hydroxychloroquine is used at higher doses for many years, a rare eye condition called retinopathy has occurred. People who take hydroxychloroquine for more than five years should get regular eye exams.

Overdose of antimalarial drugs, particularly hydroxychloroquine, can be fatal

  • collude with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to smear HCQ by funding another paper (despite dozens of studies to the contrary) where HCQ actually did help, but the authors massaged the data to remove statistical significance… and shut the trial down prematurely.  Dr. Nass’s analysis is here.