Recently retired Dr. Anthony Fauci, from nearly half a century of corruption at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), teamed with two infectious disease colleagues from NIH, David Morens and Jeffrey Taubenberger to educate the world on why after all the current COVID-19 vaccines were not sufficient to take on respiratory diseases such as the novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2.
“After more than 60 years of experience with influenza vaccines, very little improvement in vaccine prevention of infection has been noted.”
“As pointed out decades ago, and still true today, the rates of effectiveness of our best-approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases.” ~ Dr. Fauci
After decades of Fauci et. al studying these viruses, and after all that we have collectively gone through, horribly divisive mandates and other pandemic-driven madness, Fauci KNEW and has always known the clot shots wouldn’t work, but the trio of authors report on why places like the NIH will need more money to develop the next generation of vaccines, even though 5.5 TRILLION and counting have already been spent.
“We estimate that there is anywhere from half a million upwards of two million people in the U.S. alone who are having material residual problems associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. We suspect anywhere between 10,000 and 30,000 people have died from reactions that likely were associated with the countermeasures.
The pandemic response is a reflection of a deeply rooted systemic problem. An apex research institute such as the NIH or even the WHO have become ever increasingly tied into medical industry, because that’s how drugs get developed. But industry depends on investors, higher stock prices, lots of sales and growth. Pharmaceutical companies can not move into novel products that don’t produce substantial returns or profits. And Fauci is a child of this system, and he knows no other way of life. ~ TrialSite News
Mainstream media, however, and true to form, is simply obeying its masters. The acting director of NIH incorrectly discounted the lab leak and mainstream media, rather than questioning it, simply ran with it. He was caught in numerous lies by independent watchdogs.
WHO abandons plans for crucial second phase of COVID-origins investigation
Sensitive studies in China were intended to pinpoint the source of the pandemic virus.
Feb. 14, 2022
Smriti Mallapaty
The World Health Organization (WHO) has quietly shelved the second phase of its much-anticipated scientific investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, citing ongoing challenges over attempts to conduct crucial studies in China, Nature has learned.
Researchers say they are disappointed that the investigation isn’t going ahead, because understanding how the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 first infected people is important for preventing future outbreaks. But without access to China, there is little that the WHO can do to advance the studies, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada. “Their hands are really tied.” (See link for article)
Recently, on the Joe Rogan Experience, Jordan Peterson announced the establishment of a new international movement, open to the public, devoted to developing an invitational vision of the future, trying to collectively formulate the answer to six key questions. We invite all those who might be interested to contribute to the conversation.
Our inaugural conference will take place in London, England Oct 31, Nov 1 and Nov 2, 2023. More details about the organization, public participation and the conference will be announced as soon as possible. Watch the full episode: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4GJZ…
That’s right folks. No admissions, no corrections, no apologies, just policy changes, and hand waving.
But the real clincher is that the FDA’s emergency use authorizations (EUA) for COVID-19 products – including tests and “vaccines” – and major Medicare telehealth “flexibilities” will remain intact – even after the emergency has ended. This blatant overreach will insure that the gene therapy injections and favored treatments, such as Paxlovid and Lagevrio, will continue.Heaven forbid those cash cows end!
HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra sent a letter to U.S. governors with the surprise announcement that perfectly demonstrates what this is all about:
“When this transition to traditional health care coverage occurs later this year, many Americans will continue to pay nothing out-of-pocket for the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) are a preventive health service for most private insurance plans and will be fully covered without a co-pay.Currently, COVID-19 vaccinations are covered under Medicare Part B without cost sharing, and this will continue. Medicaid will continue to cover all COVID-19 vaccinations without a co-pay or cost sharing through September 30, 2024, and will cover ACIP-recommended vaccines for most beneficiaries thereafter.”
Becerra did not bother to mention that COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission or infection, or that they potentially cause increased risk of COVID-19.
Welcome to the era of The Eternal Non-Emergency Emergency.
This insightful video with Bret Weinstein and Healther Heying (both PhDs in Biology) discuss public health tyrants in the U.S. and globally as the COVID narrative continues to crumble. Please also read this article on how CDC director Walensky is calling for an overhaul of the U.S. public health, and while this is desperately needed, an overhaul on Walsky’s terms will only further cover up the inherent problems and merge national security with public health – a dangerous agenda that will only further destroy medical freedom.
Fertility declines near the end of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence of the 2022 birth declines in Germany and Sweden
Bujard, Martin; Andersson, Gunnar (2022)
BiB Working Paper 6/2022. Wiesbaden: Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung
“Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, several countries faced short-term fertility declines in 2020 and 2021, a development which did not materialize in Scandinavian and German-speaking countries. However, more recent birth statistics show a steep fertility decline in the aftermath of the pandemic in 2022. We aim to provide data on the unexpected birth decline in 2022 in Germany and Sweden and relate these data to pandemic-related contextual developments which could have influenced the post-pandemic fertility development. We rely on monthly birth statistics and present seasonally adjusted monthly Total Fertility Rates (TFR) for Germany and Sweden. We relate the nine-months lagged fertility rates to contextual developments regarding COVID-19 mortality and morbidity, unemployment rates, and COVID-19 vaccinations.
The seasonally adjusted monthly TFR of Germany dropped from 1.5-1.6 in 2021 to 1.3-1.4 in 2022, a decline of about 14%. In Sweden, the corresponding TFR dropped from about 1.7 in 2021 to 1.5-1.6 in 2022, a decline of almost 10%. There is no association of the fertility trends with changes in unemployment, infection rates, or COVID-19 deaths. However, there is a strong association between the onset of vaccination programmes and the fertility decline nine months after of this onset.The fertility decline in the first months of 2022 in Germany and Sweden is remarkable. Common explanations of fertility change during the pandemic do not apply in its aftermath. The association between the onset of mass vaccinations and subsequent fertility decline indicates that people adjusted their behaviour to get vaccinated before becoming pregnant, as societies were opening up with post-pandemic life conditions. Our study provides novel information on fertility declines in countries previously not affected by any COVID-19 baby bust. We provide a first appraisal of the COVID-19-fertility nexus in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic.”
In the current administration, it appears that no amount of public face plants will get health officials quietly shuffled out of their positions. During the pandemic response, flawed as it was, the American people watched as a master manipulator with decades of experienced double talk, gaslighting families and bold faced lies to the public. Tony Fauci was a rare breed of operator with a pedigree to conceal inconvenient truths in realtime – and he did with masks, vaccines efficacy, safety and lockdowns.
Then we have CDC director Rochelle Walensky. She is in many ways the antithesis of Fauci and his ilk. Although much of the public knows that a manipulative response is coming after she’s asked a question, her answers leave people within earshot frustrated and hopeless. Not because she’s an inept public health leader but because her effort to conceal truths has front facing childlike unpreparedness.
At one time in her career, Walensky may have been a sharp, hard-hitting professor at Harvard and hospital chief propelling her into the director position at the top public health agency in the US. Yet, akin to a Benjamin Button of health communication and public relations, Walensky seems to regress in tact, professionalism and trust as her tenure as CDC director goes forward in time. With Charles Manson-like eye contact, Walensky often says things she probably shouldn’t say out loud – or at the very least, seems not to know any better. (See link for article)
________________
SUMMARY:
Walensky et al., who all knew Pfizer never properly tested their gene therapy product for effectiveness or safety, went from saying COVID jabs were 95% effective to they don’t stop transmission or infection, after millions had already received them.
She face-planted completely off the PR wagon when she blamed ‘too much optimism’ for the reason ‘nobody’ thought the efficacy would wane or be potent against other variants.
Some speculate that similarly to Brazil, this might be the path to require low-income families to have their children “vaccinated” to receive government aid benefits, such as food stamps.
The COVID-19 “vaccines” now add another 2-3 doses of vaccines to the 25 doses of other vaccines already on the CDC schedule that can be injected into babies and toddlers during their first 15 months of life.
This also opens the door for local health departments and schools to add these shots to the CDC list of recommended vaccines as a requirement for school attendance.This should trouble everyone.
Nobody seems to care that these gene therapy jabs DO NOT have FDA approval. They remain under emergency use authorization (EUA) and are linked to more adverse reactions and death than ANY other vaccine in the history of VAERS, which only has a 1% capture rate.
Walensky had the gall to state that ‘misinformation’ was the reason people are losing faith in the childhood vaccination schedule, despite the fact overall safety testing is less than what the world just experienced with COVID shots. This would almost be humorous if it wasn’t so serious.
When questioned over the known harm masks have caused children and adults, Walensky doubled down on the mantra that masks prevent transmission, despite a meta-analysis on 78 studies by Cochrane that determined masks probably make little to no difference in the outcome of influenza-like illnesses like COVID.The analysis also reported: “Harms were rarely measured and poorly reported.” Bingo! Can we pleeeeeeeze move on from the mask nonsense?
Go here for a “must read” article on how despite the good scholarship of the mask review, Cochrane has become nothing more than a “political junk science rag.” Within the article is a rare interview with Tom Jefferson, one of the study authors, who doesn’t trust the media (gee I wonder why?). Jefferson states: “Governments completely failed to do the right thing and demand better evidence.” I highly recommend reading the transcript as Jefferson highlights the shenanigans within science journals that will do virtually anything nowadays to publish the “right answer,” i.e. accepted answer for the accepted narrative.
In this important video, Dr. Prasad reads a statement from CDC director Rochelle Walensky and then states the following:
“She’s just making things up. She’s good at making things up. She made up the fact that there’s credible data that we should mask kids between 2 and 5 even though UNICEF and the WHO said not to do that. She made that up. She makes up lots of things, because she doesn’t actually use science to guide decision making, she just likes to make things up.” ~ Dr. Vinay Prasad
While health “authorities” try and cover their backsides and excuse their incompetence and/or evil intent by stating they had to do something other than wait around for “the science,” a Cochrane study author states it best:
“…it’s a complete subversion of the ‘precautionary principle’ which states that you should do nothing unless you have reasonable evidence that benefits outweigh the harms.” ~ Tom Jefferson, Cochrane epidemiologist
Latest mRNA jab for RSV,a common childhood virus causing cold-like symptoms, wins expedited review, after MSM and ‘the powers that be’ perform identical line-dance moves over a supposed ‘tripledemic,’ that many blame on lockdowns that isolated people from common infections they normally develop antibodies to.
Previously I posted Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts explaining the dystopian WHO International Health Regulations proposed amendments here; however, it’s worth revisiting as more is coming out including the fact it would supersede the U.S. Constitution and give unelected officials far too much power without any oversight or representation.
The WHO is demanding the power to dictate health policy worldwide, including:
• compulsory jabs
• lockdowns
• business and border closures
• detention of the noncompliant
A shipment of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 sent to Sudan. Many governments struggled to secure sufficient vaccines for their citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Credit: Ebrahim Hamid/AFP/Getty
The World Health Organization (WHO) last week published a draft of the first legally binding treaty intended to ensure that vaccines, drugs and diagnostics are shared more equitably around the world during the next pandemic, avoiding the deep divides seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Researchers say that the document is an ambitious effort to address searing inequities that occurred during the pandemic, but that it doesn’t do enough to force countries to share scarce resources or punish those that don’t comply.
“It has more heart and brain than I expected,” says Kelley Lee, scientific co-director at the Pacific Institute on Pathogens, Pandemics and Society in Burnaby, Canada. “But it still has insufficient teeth and an insufficient spine to ensure that we’ll definitely have a better response next time.”
The treaty has the potential to “make a tremendous difference for the next pandemic”, says Suerie Moon, a researcher who studies global health policy at the Geneva Graduate Institute in Switzerland. “This is a once-in-a-generation chance to fix some of the big weaknesses that we saw during COVID-19.” These failures included the huge gulf in access to vaccines. Compared with high-income countries, where some 73% of people have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, only 31% of people in low-income countries have had one or more doses.
WHO member states will now begin debating the terms of the document — known as the zero draft — at a series of meetings, the first of which will begin later this month. Researchers expect the negotiations to be contentious, and some of the language is likely to be watered down before the agreement is adopted in 2024. (See link for article)
______________
Key focus of the agreement:
equity
temporary waivers on intellectual property rights for rapid manufacturing of vaccines, equipment, masks, diagnostics, and drugs
data sharing
supplying pathogens & genomic sequences to a lab in the WHO’s network within hours of a new pathogen being identified
states will supply WHO 20% of the vaccines, diagnostics and drugs they produce – half as donations & half at affordable costs
parties will allocate no less than 5% of their annual health budget for pandemic prevention and response and should earmark an as-yet-unspecified percentage of their gross domestic product
despite the document’s intention to be legally binding, researchers worry that the current form is too weak to stop signatories from ignoring rules, and negotiations to ensure compliance have been pushed back to be addressed after the treaty has been accepted.
Whitney Webb Exposes Scary Truths About WHO’s New Chief Scientist
Investigative journalist Whitney Webb discusses the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recent appointment of Jeremy Farrar as its new chief scientist. Webb raises concerns about the WHO’s plans to expand its power by forcing member states to adhere to its guidelines and the potential consequences of this power grab. She also delves into Farrar’s background as the director of the Wellcome Trust, a major funder of medical research in the UK with ties to the pharmaceutical industry. Webb suggests that the Wellcome Trust’s influence on public health policy has been largely overlooked and warns of the potential implications of Farrar’s new role at the WHO.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
December 13, 2022, the World Health Organization named Dr. Jeremy Farrar as its new chief scientist for global health
Farrar, while director for the Wellcome Trust, was complicit in the coverup of SARS-CoV-2’s origin
The Wellcome Trust, which Farrar led from 2013 until February 2023, is part of the technocratic globalist network and the modern eugenics movement
Farrar has been on the forefront pushing the envelope on vaccine development, such that experimental gene therapy is now used as a preventive for viral infection. When COVID broke out, Farrar founded Wellcome Leap, which is basically the DARPA of global public health. Its focus is wholly on transhumanist research to usher in the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Farrar and WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus are part of a small and tight-knit but global network that is working behind the scenes to influence global health, finance and governance
December 13, 2022, the World Health Organization named Dr. Jeremy Farrar as its new chief scientist for global health.1 As chief scientist, Farrar will oversee the WHO’s science division “to develop and deliver high quality health services” worldwide.
As detailed in “The Dam of Lies Surrounding COVID Lab Leak Is Breaking,” February 1, 2020, Farrar convened a conference call with Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins and several scientists to discuss tell-tale signs that SARS-CoV-2 was genetically engineered, which meant the pandemic was the result of a lab leak.
At the time, Farrar wrote that “On a spectrum if zero is nature and 100 is release — I am honestly at 50!”2 But rather than being transparent, Farrar became complicit in Fauci’s and Collins’ coverup of SARS-CoV-2’s origin. But that’s far from the only reason to be concerned about Farrar’s new role.
Farrar’s Links to the Globalist Cabal
Farrar was the director of the Wellcome Trust from 2013 until February 2023, and as explained by investigative journalist Whitney Webb in the video above, the Wellcome Trust is part of the technocratic globalist network and the modern eugenics movement.3
Not only is the Wellcome Trust the archivist for the Eugenics Society, now known as the Galton Institute, but it also has a eugenics-directed center of its own. The Wellcome Trust’s Centre for Human Genetics investigates race genetics and susceptibility to diseases and infertility, and co-funds research and development of vaccines and birth control methods with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Wellcome’s board consists of present or former bankers, insurance executives and investment board members. The founder, Sir Henry Wellcome, while still alive, also founded the company that went on to become GlaxoSmithKline, so the Wellcome Trust is essentially the “philanthropic arm” of GSK. The Wellcome Trust is also one of the investors behind Vaccitech, a private company that holds the patents and royalties for the AstraZeneca COVID jab.
Considering the WHO’s plan to seize control over health care decisions worldwide, starting with pandemic responses — a move that will essentially turn the WHO into an incubator for a One World Government or New World Order (NWO) — its selection of Farrar makes sense. He’s part of the technocracy and is a eugenics insider already.
A Recipe for Disaster
If the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty gets signed this year (and there’s every reason to suspect it will be), then Farrar will wield unprecedented power and influence, as member nations will have no choice but to adhere to his medical recommendations. What’s so concerning about that is his willingness to embrace reckless science and transhumanist pie-in-the-sky ideals.
As noted by Webb, Farrar has been on the forefront pushing the envelope on vaccine development, such that experimental gene therapy is now used as a preventive for viral infection. When COVID broke out, Farrar founded Wellcome Leap, an organization that “builds bold, unconventional programs” that “aim to deliver … seemingly impossible results on seemingly impossible timelines.”4
The CEO of Wellcome Leap, Regina Dugan,5 worked at the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) from 1996 until 2012. Between 2009 and 2012, she served as its first female director. In 2012, Dugan left DARPA to create a DARPA equivalent for Google called Advanced Technology and Projects (ATAP). She later took on a similar project at Facebook, called Building 8.
DARPA, of course, is heavily invested in transhumanist technologies for the use in soldiers, including brain-machine interfaces and other even more extreme ideas. Wellcome Leap is basically the DARPA of global public health, with all the transhumanist connotations that brings, and this is the kind of mindset Farrar brings to his position as chief scientist at the WHO. What could go wrong?
“I would argue Farrar is a recipe for disaster when it comes to imposing experimental medical technologies on the population during public health crises,” Webb says. “This is a guy who was very much invested in this stuff …
In terms of the kinds of pandemic response policies he supports, it’s lockdowns, masks — essentially all of that stuff. And he was the architect of a lot of that, specifically for the WHO during COVID-19. He has consistently supported policies that really, ultimately, have little to do with public health.”
Farrar Will Usher In Transhumanism Globally
As explained in greater depth by Webb in her interview with Kim Iversen, what we’re seeing is the merger of the medical industry with Big Tech and the military-intelligence complex. There are longstanding plans to introduce biosurveillance, and this is being done primarily through the health care sector.
Surveillance technologies are basically being introduced and sold as technologies to help you manage your health better but, ultimately, it’s not about promoting health, it’s about implementing increasingly more invasive surveillance mechanisms without setting off alarm bells.
According to historian and WEF transhumanist “guru” Yuval Harari, wearable and/or implanted surveillance technologies will ultimately be used “to wipe out dissent, because even if you outwardly act like you agree with leadership and are supportive of certain agendas and policies, but you’re internally not, the government will know.”
As noted by Webb, “That’s his interpretation of that stuff and it’s just totally insane.” As for Farrar’s Wellcome Leap, there’s no doubt its focus, like DARPA’s, is on transhumanist research. For example, one project involves mapping infants’ brain development to create a “perfect child brain model” that they then intend to use as the basis for AI-based interventions in infants and toddlers, with the goal of making them “cognitively homogenous.”6 As noted by Webb:
“It just sounds like mad scientist stuff and per Wellcome Leap, which again is an organization with a lot of influence, they’re hoping to have 80% of kids subjected to that by 2030. So if Jeremy Farrar as chief scientist of the WHO is willing to sign off on a program like that, with those kinds of insane ambitions … I mean it’s just like something out of Aldous Huxley’s ‘Brave New World.'”
Farrar Is Part of Small but Global Network
Other investigators have also identified Farrar as being part of a small but global network that is working behind the scenes to influence global health, finance and governance. In September 2021, German journalist and filmmaker Markus Langemann posted the video above, in which he presents some of the highlights from a 170-page document that details more than 7,200 links between 6,500 entities and objects, including payment flows and investments related to the COVID scam.
The audio is in German but there is a captioned translation at the bottom of the video. You can review and download the document here.7 This document was created using software that investigators and detectives use to help them identify hidden connections between potential suspects based on publicly available data.
Red arrows are used throughout the document to indicate money flows, such as grants, donations and other payments. As one example, as shown on page 3, at least 21 U.S. universities are financed by and through just three key organizations, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Philanthropy project (a research and grantmaking foundation linked to the World Economic Forum) and the Wellcome Trust.
According to the anonymous IT specialist who created the document, the core of this “COVID criminal network,” around whom most everything revolves, is no larger than 20 or 30 people. Several of them appear on page 36, and among them we find not only Farrar, but also WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
This close-knit group of people got together May 8, 2019, at a CDU/CSU event where they discussed how to strengthen global health and implement the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The CDU/CSU is a political alliance of two German political parties, the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) and the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU).
From that May 2019 meeting onward, these individuals are found again and again, in overlapping working groups. You also find them rubbing elbows in the past.
One event Farrar attended that seems relevant was the February 14, 2019, tabletop exercise on International Response to Deliberate Biological Events, as shown on page 124. Individuals from the Chinese CDC and the Gates Foundation were also present.
In 2018, Farrar became a member of the International Advisory Board on Global Health. He also joined the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, a joint arm of the WHO and the World Bank, formally launched in May 2018. Dr. Anthony Fauci is also a member of this board.
Key Organizations
Due to the complexity of the network connections, there’s really no easy way to summarize them here. You simply have to go through the document, page by page. That said, key organizations, whose networking connections are detailed, include:
The Wellcome Trust
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
The World Health Organization
The Rockefeller Foundation
The World Bank Group
The World Economic Forum (WEF)
GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, founded by the Gates Foundation
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), founded by the governments of Norway and India, the Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust and WEF
The Global Fund
Forum of Young Global Leaders, founded by WEF in 2004
FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics, seeks to ensure equitable access to reliable diagnosis around the world
Big Pharma
Johns Hopkins University
Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin
The Robert Koch Institute
The European Commission
The European Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
The Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products
The German Global Health Hub
Of these, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation appears to be near the top, or the center, of this criminal network, depending on how you visualize it. Gates is also a major funder of the WHO, and, as noted by Webb, it’s likely billionaires like Gates and his Big Pharma and Big Tech allies who are the puppeteers pulling the WHO’s strings.
Ultimately, they’re the ones trying to seize control of global health, as medicine is the vehicle they’ll use to usher in their technocratic, transhumanistdystopia.
How the WHO Has Wielded Previous Pandemic Instruments
To give us an idea of how the WHO might end up misusing the powers it would gain through its Pandemic Treaty, we can look at the International Health Regulations (IHR),8 which the U.S. signed on to in 2005.
The IHR is what empowered the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).9 This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts.
The IHR allows the unelected director-general of the WHO to declare a PHEIC and, suddenly, all member states have to dance to his tune. It basically grants the WHO dictatorial powers over health policy.
PHEICs have included the phony H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2009, the inconsequential Zika outbreak in 2016, the overhyped Ebola outbreak in 2019, and, of course, the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020. All of these PHEICs were poorly handled and the WHO was criticized as inept and corrupt10 in their wake.
So, through the IHR, the WHO has already been significantly empowered to dictate global health policy with regard to pandemics, and they used that power to bamboozle the nations of the world into spending billions of dollars on countermeasures, especially drugs and vaccines, that didn’t work very well.
In that sense, the WHO is really just another wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Big Pharma collaborators make billions on the taxpayers’ dime, while the people of the world are left to suffer the consequences of fast-tracked vaccines.
Its handling of the COVID pandemic in particular has been unprecedentedly bad, as they were behind the withholding of early treatment with safe medicines worldwide. So, why would anyone expect the WHO to become less corrupt if given even more power and control, which is what the Pandemic Treaty will give them?
WHO Extends COVID Emergency
Additional evidence that the WHO is corrupt and inept can be seen in the fact that they, at the end of January 2023, extended the public health emergency over COVID for another three months.11 So, even though government officials around the world have publicly stated that the pandemic is over, the WHO is not willing to relinquish emergency powers.
Even if the WHO eventually drops the PHEIC, they have a plan to still keep everyone’s feet to the proverbial fire. As reported by STAT News:12
“In order to prepare for the eventual termination of the PHEIC, the emergency committee recommended that the WHO develop other ways to maintain attention on COVID, including accelerating the integration of surveillance for COVID into the long-standing program that monitors influenza transmission and viral evolution around the globe.”
In other words, they will continue fearmongering and pushing for the implementation of biosurveillance and vaccine passports/digital IDs. Similarly, during the January 2023 WEF meeting in Davos, Switzerland, former prime minister of the U.K., Tony Blair, called for a “digital infrastructure” to monitor everyone’s vaccine status, not only for COVID but also for all the other “vaccines that will come down the line.”13
Everywhere you look, pawns of the globalist cabal are singing the same tune. They want more surveillance and control over the population, which translates into less personal freedom and bodily autonomy.
US Extends COVID Emergency
President Biden is also holding on to his emergency powers even though no emergency exists. In September 2022, he said the pandemic was over.14 Then, January 11, 2023, he extended the public health emergency until April,15 ostensibly due to the emergence of XBB.1.5.
While this variant is rapidly spreading, it’s causing only mild cold symptoms. So, essentially, the government is hogging emergency powers because of cold symptoms now. What’s next? All the signs point to the idea that COVID is intended to be a “permanent emergency,” and, of course, the longer it drags out, the more people resign themselves to that fact.
Aside from facilitating unconstitutional overreaches, there are other reasons for keeping the public health emergency status as well. Importantly, it allows for the allocation of medical resources and funding that benefit Big Pharma and the medical industry. For example, lifting the emergency would limit who can administer the COVID jabs — such as pharmacists — at a time when Big Pharma is pushing to get more people to get boosted.
What Can You Do?
While preventing the WHO Pandemic Treaty from being enacted will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, as “regular people” have no say in the matter, there are still things you can do to protect your freedom. Importantly, do not sign up for a vaccine passport, digital ID or central bank digital currency (CBDC).
These will be sold as marvels of convenience but do not be fooled. They are the gateway to a prison state you will not be able to extricate from. Our best hope of thwarting the plan for a One World Government is to refuse to adopt these core surveillance technologies en masse. Once a nation goes completely cashless, the entire population is trapped.
Instead, we need to build and expand parallel economies and industries that do not rely on these technologies. Start small and local, and develop strong communities for mutual support and exchange. This way, you become more resilient against coercion.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 