Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

But She Looks Fine: From Illness To Activism

https://www.lymedisease.org/from-illness-to-activism-olivia/

From illness to activism, Olivia just keeps going

By Dorothy Kupcha Leland

May 3, 2023

I first became aware of Olivia Goodreau about six years ago.

I was at my computer, watching the livestream of the first meeting of the federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group, which convened in Washington DC in December 2017.

At one point, during the meeting’s public comments, a young blonde girl stepped up to the microphone and confidently said, “My name is Olivia Goodreau, and I am 13 years old…I have had Lyme disease for half of my life, and I do not remember what it feels like not to be sick.”

This poised and well-spoken teenager certainly got my attention. I imagine everybody else watching that day took notice as well.

That was just the beginning of Olivia’s public activism on behalf of Lyme patients. She and her family started an organization called the LivLyme Foundation. It has raised money to help pay for Lyme treatment for children, sponsored conferences, and given research grants to scientists.

Through it all, Olivia has functioned as the public face of the foundation. She speaks to the media, helps plan LivLyme events, and sometimes meets with legislators and prominent researchers—heady stuff for a teenager.

She has also worked with a team of design and development experts to create an app called the TickTracker. It allows people to use their cell phones to report and track the location of ticks.

And now she has written a book.

Mysterious symptoms

In her memoir But She Looks Fine: From Illness to Activism, Olivia tells her story from when she first starts experiencing mysterious health symptoms at age 7.

In second grade, weird things start happening. Her vision goes in and out, and sometimes she finds it hard to move her body. “My back turned into a wooden board,” she writes. “My feet became cement blocks.”

A bizarre episode during a school choir performance brings Olivia to the brink of collapse. She lands in the hospital and endures days of tests, including x-rays, EKGs, and an MRI. None of it reveals anything amiss. One doctor tells her she just needs to drink more water. The family chooses to keep looking for answers.

After she’s been seen by more than 50 doctors, someone thinks to test Olivia for Lyme disease. When her Western blot comes back positive, they give her the CDC-recommended protocol of 30 days of antibiotics. Initially, she feels better with the drugs. But a few days after finishing the pills, her symptoms return with a vengeance.

Eventually, Olivia is seen by renowned Lyme expert Dr. Richard Horowitz. He diagnoses her with chronic Lyme, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), various co-infections and a rare blood disorder. Slowly and surely, Olivia writes, his treatments help her feel better. But it doesn’t happen all at once.

Yearning for “normal”

About this time, the LivLyme Foundation is kicking into high gear and Olivia becomes heavily involved in the world of Lyme activism. She clearly takes great satisfaction from this, but she also longs for normal teenage experiences like friends, parties, and school activities.

Regrettably, some unfortunate instances of bullying mar her middle school years. (I’m aware of other young people with Lyme disease who also have been harassed at school. Not only do these kids have to deal with their miserable symptoms, but they must also put up with bad behavior from classmates. It’s the pits.)

A particularly compelling aspect of the book is the advice Olivia gives in the form of six letters. “Dear Parents,” “Dear Doctors,” “Dear Classmates,” “Dear Politicians,” “Dear Scientists and Researchers,” and “Dear Significant Other” speak to what ailing young people need from others in their lives.

Though not mentioned in the book, social media posts tell us Olivia will attend UCLA in the fall. (My alma mater!)

I suspect she will continue as a force to be reckoned with in the world of Lyme advocacy—or anything else she undertakes.

If you want an inspiring read, pick up a copy of But She Looks Fine: From Illness to Activism.

TOUCHED BY LYME is written by Dorothy Kupcha Leland, President of LymeDisease.org. She is co-author of When Your Child Has Lyme Disease: A Parent’s Survival Guide. Contact her at dleland@lymedisease.org.

For more:

FOIA Reveals Incestuous Relationship Between HHS/CDC & American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists

https://www.americaoutloud.com/foia-reveals-troubling-relationship-between-hhs-cdc-the-american-college-of-obstetricians-and-gynecologists/

FOIA Reveals Troubling Relationship between HHS/CDC & the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

by  | May 7, 2023

Imagine this – you’ve just learned you are pregnant. Emotions flood over you. Regardless of any decisions you make concerning the pregnancy, one thing is certain – your life is forever changed in this moment.

Fast forward to your first obstetrical appointment. Waiting nervously to meet your ob-gyn doctor, you make a mental checklist of issues you want to discuss. You presume conversations you are about to have with your doctor will be confidential. You also presume the medical opinions your doctor is about to give will be transparent and honest, in the best interests of you and your baby, and based on your ob-gyn’s independent medical judgment.

Spoiler alert: some conversations you will have with your ob-gyn have been pre-determined – namely, whether you should consent to take the COVID-19 “vaccine” while you are pregnant. Should you refuse your ob-gyn’s recommendation to take the COVID-19 shot, this will likely be recorded in your medical record, potentially shared with governmental officials, and you’ll be asked again to comply in future appointments.1 In what amounts to the ultimate patient betrayal, these pre-arranged COVID-19 “vaccine” discussions are not necessarily the product of your doctor’s independent medical judgment and do not provide informed consent about the known and unknown risks of the shots to both mother and baby. Rather, these conversations are likely fashioned to push the HHS’s/CDC’s pro-COVID-19 “vaccine” narrative, in what seems to be an attempt to capture ob-gyn doctors and their patients across two continents.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

This is not the first time the CDC has either used or created an organization to push their agenda.  The CDC created a “Lyme Corps” to sabotage state laws protecting Lyme disease patients:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/07/07/cdc-sabotages-state-laws-protecting-lyme-patients/  Excerpt:

It appears that the CDC Lyme Corps program is a national public health education program.  From 2013 to 2016, the CDC website provided no information regarding Lyme Corps.  In mid-May 2016, the CDC website posted a few sentences that provide meager information regarding Lyme Corps.  In a clear departure from normal federal transparency practices regarding public access to unclassified program information, the CDC has made Lyme Corps’ basic program information largely unavailable.

Internet research has found some information regarding Lyme Corps.  According to a conference poster, the CDC Lyme Corps program is a “new means of educating health care providers (HCPs) and the public about Lyme disease because: 1) recent surveys indicate that provider practices are often inconsistent with current Guidelines  and 2) inaccurate information about Lyme disease is disseminated broadly through internet forums, social media, and traditional media.  Pairing these needs with the desire for a “hands on” approach, we developed Lyme Corps. Lyme Corps trains students pursuing health care degrees… to provide Lyme disease education and outreach to both HCPs and the public. Participants’ primary responsibilities include: 1) educating colleagues; 2) educating HCPs via clinic visits and material dissemination; and 3) increasing public knowledge in-person and online.” [v]

As noted, the CDC appears to be concerned that “provider practices are often inconsistent with current guidelines”.  The ‘current guidelines’ referred to are the 2006 Lyme Guidelines written by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA).

To be clear, the CDC is using Lyme Corps to tell health practitioners the only valid treatment for Lyme, chronic Lyme and complications from coinfections are found in the 2006 IDSA Lyme Guidelines.  However, key science institutions and federal agencies would not support this objective.

With this history in mind, please read on to learn how captured government public health agencies are up to their old tricks:

SUMMARY:

  • The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) is the leading organization for obstetricians and gynecologists and has more than 60,000 members spanning North, South, and Central America. 
  • HHS launched a propaganda machine called COVID-19 Community Corps to push the COVID shots and awarded BILLIONS of tax dollars to recruit “trusted community leaders,” to exploit our most private relationships.  This is unethical and deceptive as government involvement – as well as payment, has not been fully disclosed.
  • The COVID-19 Community Corps announcement page has now been taken down with even the original URL removed. These HHS “trusted messengers” infiltrated every nook and cranny of our lives.
  • The ACOG received millions in grant money for being a founding member of the COVID-19 Community Corps, and recklessly endorsed the COVID shots in pregnancy even though NO CLINICAL TRIALS INCLUDED PREGNANT WOMEN.
    • The ACOG website archives show that its initial official recommendation was to allow pregnant women the freedom to choose the shots or not.  This abruptly changed to only follow CDC guidance.
    • One project is called “Engaging Women’s Health Care Providers for Effective COVID-19 Vaccine Conversations.”53 Another separate grant is entitled “Improving Ob/Gyns’ Ability to Support COVID-19 Vaccination, Mental Health, Social Support.54 Another appears to have received grant money in excess of an additional $1 million, funded at the same time – but this project was apparently so controversial that ACOG and HHS/CDC chose to redact it from public view; however, ACOG’s website provides clues on this project as it contains a special “conversation guide” page for Ob-gyn doctors, completely eliminating any necessary thinking on the part of the physician.  Doctors are told to document any pregnant woman’s refusal of the shots and they should continue to push them at subsequent visits. 
    • Doctors are to repeat the mantra that the shots do NOT cause infertility or spontaneous abortion (when VAERS data refutes this) or adverse maternal or fetal effects (when the CDC openly acknowledges “vaccine” damage and both Pfizer and the FDA knew the shots caused serious harm to both fetuses and infants).  A FOIA request shows despite high miscarriage ratesPfizer didn’t follow up, as well as:
      • The rapid decline in antibody and T cells in monkeys following the second dose.
      • Biodistribution studies (previously released in 2021 through a FOI request in Japan) showing widespread distribution of the “vaccine” with high concentration in the ovaries, liver, adrenal glands, and spleen.
      • Data on the impact of fertility outcomes for rats.
      • Data on fetal abnormalities in rats.
      • Calling these gene therapy products vaccines means that no genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies have been done.
  • Of the 275 organizations that are founding members, 25 are health and medical organizations including the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Nurses Association, (ANA), the American Medical Women Association (AMWA), and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).  This certainly explains some things.
  • According to a December 23, 2020 article published by CBS News, HHS ran “focus groups” to fine-tune its pro-“vaccine” message for what then HHS Deputy Assistant Sec. Weber referred to as “the moveable middle.”14 Weber also reportedly noted, “Communication science says you need a messenger who resonates as trusted.15
  • Harvard public health professor Jay Winsten, who has advised previous administrations, reportedly explained to CBS News in its December 2020 article, “You want to go for the low-hanging fruit, those that are easiest to pick and harvest.”17  Winsten added, “People trust their own doctors, their own nurses, their own pastors, their own social networks.” An article was published in the Journal of Health Communication in April of 2022 detailing the process.19 Featuring Weber as lead author, the article confirms that HHS did, in fact, target interpersonal relationshipsWeber’s efforts were so successful that after he retired from HHS, in revolving door fashion, he formed his own private company whose purpose is to achieve goals at the federal level –skills he developed on the tax-payer’s dime as a “public servant.”
  • Market research impacted every element of the “vaccination” campaign from the beginning.
  • Dr. Thorpe made a FOIA request to obtain documents involving the three $11 million “Cooperative Agreement” grants HHS/CDC made to ACOG during the pandemic which triggered 1400+ pages, and half was redacted.
  • The FOIA requests reveal government capture in that ACOG must fully comply with all existing and future HHS guidance.  No thinking persons need apply, just follow your orders. 
  • Government agencies are now using ACOG (and many other medical organizations) to deliver its messages without being seen.
  • Further, ACOG’s mandatory compliance with the CDC means that not only is the CDC inside the patient room influencing the conversation, but so is the Gates Foundation, Big Pharma, and many other private entities due to the fact the CDC Foundation gets money from these sources.
Yet more proof of the ongoing Lyme conspiracy and experimentation on American Citizens.

Do not trust public health agencies.  They stopped caring about public health decades ago, if they ever cared at all.

What Happens If a Tick Is Removed From a Student At School

https://www.lymedisease.org/pa-legislation-tick-removal-school/

If a tick is removed from a student at school, what happens next?

The Pennsylvania State Senate has passed legislation by Sen. Michele Brooks to create a standard protocol in response to a tick being removed from a student during the school day.

Senate Bill 232 would require school officials to notify parents in writing about the tick removal and provide information on the symptoms of Lyme disease. The notification will include the date of the tick removal and the recommendation that the child’s parent or guardian promptly seek medical treatment.

The bill also states that the tick must be preserved for the student’s parent or guardian to send to East Stroudsburg University’s tick lab for free testing for tick-related diseases including Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever or Powassan virus.

The school also has the option of sending the tick for testing.

“Testing a tick found on a child can provide critical information to help medical professionals prevent the child from long-term or chronic effects from the diseases ticks can carry,” Brooks said.

“In keeping with my ongoing efforts to combat the tick crisis in Pennsylvania, I encourage anyone who has removed a tick from themselves, a pet, and especially a child, to place it in a plastic zip-locked bag and send it to the tick lab.”

Pennsylvania leads the nation in the number of Lyme disease cases. Approximately one in four cases of Lyme occur in children, with children ages five to nine being at the greatest risk for contracting Lyme and other tick-borne illnesses.

The bill now moves to the House of Representatives for consideration.

SOURCE OF PRESS RELEASE: The Office of State Senator Michele Brooks

Editorial from Williamsport Sun-Gazette endorsing the legislation: Schools a logical ally in fight against tick-borne diseases

________________

**Comment**

What’s sad here is that it should be normal procedure to contact the parents of a child that has been bitten by a tick.  Duh.  But, in today’s crazy world, this has to be legislated.  And even then, it might not happen!

For more:

Rather than give medical advice about recommended treatment, I’m going to quote the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS – how to handle a tick bite):

“ILADS recommends that prophylaxis (preventive treatment) be discussed with all who have had a blacklegged tick bite. An appropriate course of antibiotics has been shown to prevent the onset of infection.

When the decision is made to use antibiotic prophylaxis, ILADS recommends 20 days of doxycycline (provided there are no contraindications).  The decision to treat a blacklegged tick bite with antibiotics often depends on where in the country the bite occurred, whether there was evidence that the tick had begun feeding, and the age of the person who was bitten.  Based on the available evidence, and provided that it is safe to do so, ILADS recommends a 20-day course of doxycycline.

Patients should also know that although doxycycline can prevent cases of Lyme disease, ticks in some areas carry multiple pathogens, some of which, including Babesia, Powassan virus, and Bartonella, are not responsive to doxycycline. This means a person could contract a tick-borne illness despite receiving antibiotic prophylaxis for their known bite.

ILADS recommends against single-dose doxycycline. Some doctors prescribe a single 200 mg dose of doxycycline for a known bite. However, as discussed in detail in the guidelines, this practice is based on a flawed study that has never been replicated.

Read more in the ILADS treatment guidelines.

For more on treatment:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/02/13/lyme-disease-treatment/  Although it’s highly doubtful even a LLMD will give you more than doxy, you can read and learn about herbs that are effective against the other coinfections and layer those in yourself.  Of course, discuss all treatments with your doctor.

Proof the Vaccines Were a Military-Backed Countermeasure & NIH Insider Gives Important History Lesson

https://brownstone.org/articles/proof-vaccines-were-military-backed-countermeasure/

Proof that the Vaccines Were a Military-Backed Countermeasure

Here is a high-level review of the manufacturing contracts between US DOD and Moderna.

Moderna’s injection, mRNA-1273 is co-owned with the US Government, as the company has been funded by the defense research grants for years and also received intellectual property transfers from the US Government, in addition to preclinical and clinical research work conducted for Moderna by the NIH Vaccine Research Center. The NIH and Moderna each have a separate Investigational New Drug number for this product.

Moderna entered 2 types of contracts with the US Government for Spikevax injection:

  • “Vaccine” contract and amendments that specifies R&D projects that the US Government ordered and paid for. Note that in Pfizer’s case no R&D activities were ordered or paid for by the US Government, as these were excluded from the scope of the contract.
  • “Manufacturing” contract(s) that ordered a large-scale manufacturing. This is different from Pfizer manufacturing contracts as the words “demonstration” and “prototype” are not used. I believe this is because OTA contracts must be for prototypes but FAR contracting doesn’t have to be.

Note on redactions. In both Moderna and Pfizer’s contracts many areas are redacted indicating a reason for redaction – the “redaction codes.” Redacted content has been given codes b (4) and b (6), standing for:

(b) (4) Disclosure of information that would affect the application of advanced technology in a U.S. weapons system,

and

(b) (6) Disclosure of information, including information of foreign governments, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States.

There are several versions of the contract available, plus amendments. The first version was signed on August 9, 2020 and the last available version is June 15, 2021. In one of them the name of the signatory on the Moderna side was redacted with (b)(6). In another version it’s unredacted – it was Hamilton Bennett, a senior director of vaccine access and partnerships.

This 35-year-old woman seems woefully underqualified, especially to “engineer the vaccine” as her role was described in the press. Moderna’s history is notable for high-profile departures of competent and experienced people. Based on press reports and accounts of insiders, Stephan Bancel’s toxic management culture led to departures of many qualified scientists including heads of R&D, Oncology, Cardiovascular, Chemistry, Rare Diseases, and even Vaccines (right around the time the company pivoted to vaccines in 2016).  Terminal incompetence is a prerequisite for terminal fraud.   (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

This website has posted Latypova’s important work before:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/01/11/covid-gene-therapy-injections-developed-by-u-s-military-are-called-counter-measures-were-ordered-as-prototypes/

If you still believe that COVID was about public health, hopefully this article crushes that notion. You must ask yourself why information on “vaccine” manufacturer’s contracts would be redacted for “affecting the application of advanced technology in a U.S. weapons system,” and “causing serious harm to relations between the U.S. and a foreign government.”  

What on earth does a “vaccine” that is touted as preventing transmission or infection (which doesn’t), and preventing severe illness, and death (which doesn’t) have to do with U.S. weapons and harming foreign relations?  In fact, more and more is coming home to roost showing long post-COVID “vaccination” syndrome is becoming an increasingly recognized disease occurring after the COVID shots, as well as the fact they have caused more reports of adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS, which is known to only pick up 1% of reactions.

________________

And buckle up for this zinger.  You will recognize many names and agencies:

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-and-illegal-us-bioweapons-activity-an-insiders-revelations-2432.pdf

COVID-19 and Illegal US Bioweapons Activity, an Insider’s Revelations

Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester, MD. J. Bart Classen, MD* Trends in Internal Medicine Review Article ISSN 2771-5906

Citation: Classen JB. COVID-19 and Illegal US Bioweapons Activity, an Insider’s Revelations. Trends Int Med. 2022; 2(2): 1-11.

* Correspondence: Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester, MD 21102, Tel: 410-377-8526, E-mail: classen@ vaccines.net. Received: 20 Aug 2022; Accepted: 23 Sep 2022; Published: 27 Sep 2022

ABSTRACT

Millions if not billions of people now believe that the world is under a bioweapons attack. A lot of blame has been placed on the US funding of bioweapons. Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the US NIAID/NIH has come under severe criticism for funding the infamous “Gain of Function” research. Many believe Fauci has not acted alone or even on his own accord. The Author worked as a fellow at NIAID/NIH from 1988 to 1991, starting soon after Fauci became head of NIAID. The author witnessed first hand infiltration of NIAID/NIH by Israel’s Mossad. While working at NIAID/NIH one or more coworkers expressed a need to “preempt the next Jewish Holocaust”. For thirty years since leaving NIH the Author has paid close attention to Mossad’s involvement in illegal US bioweapon activity and attempts to disclose his observations. The Author hopes to educate the public on the current bioweapon attack with COVID-19 and vaccines. The Author believes that Mossad intends to kill billions of people. Already 70% of the world’s population have received a COVID-19 vaccine which in all appearance has the ability to cause deadly non curable prion disease. The Author hopes the information provided will help those interested in ending this covert war.  (See link for entire paper)

_________________

Article highlights

The author claims:

  • The Covid virus spike protein is an ethnic bioweapon made to kill and disable billions of people selectively through both SARS-CoV-2 infection and, principally, nucleic acid (RNA or DNA) shots that encode the spike protein and have regulatory approval or emergency use authorization, with no manufacturer liability even for massive vaccine damage to populations.
  • Differential binding of the spike protein to ACE-2 receptor variants can lead to more damage in some ethnic groups than others.Europeans are the hardest hit, and [redacted] are relatively spared. (See herehere, and here.)
  • Blackmailer and [redacted] operative Jeffrey Epstein’s list of [redacted] intelligence assets includes Donald Trump, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, Larry Ellison, Michael Bloomberg, Bill Gates, Buzzy Krongard, and others promoting Covid jabs.
  • Dr. David Gorski, a harsh critic of doctors questioning leaky Covid spike protein-encoding nucleic acid shots having no long-term safety profile, has admitted financial ties to [redacted] operative Jeffrey Epstein through Seed Media Group.
  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is also listed in Epstein’s contacts as a presumptive [redacted] asset.
  • Although RFK Jr. laudably warns of vaccine harms, he blames the operation on Dr. Anthony Fauci and “big pharma corruption and greed,” steering people away from [redacted], implying he is controlled opposition.  Source

This website has also posted Classen’s work before as well:

All this murky history runs in tandem with Lyme/MSIDS which also has a bioweapon component to it, a connection with Fort Detrick, and with Fauci head of NIAID – controlling the research monies and therefore, research itself (remember he’s Mr. Science).  This history is important to review, chronicle, and share as it reveals a common black thread in an ongoing playbook that corroborates Dr. David Martin‘s work.  Once you understand how deep this goes, all the powerful people involved, as well as the vast amounts of money – it all begins to make sense.  This is why politics continues to trump science, logic, and humanity.

Tick Tock: CDC Takes Its Time Treating Chronic Lyme Disease

https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2023/03/10/tick-tock-cdc-takes-its-time-treating-chronic-lyme-disease/

Tick Tock: CDC Takes Its Time Treating Chronic Lyme Disease

BY GRACE BURNS |MARCH 10, 2023
a tick on a stalk of grass

Lyme disease is caused by a bacteria that’s spread through tick bites. If left untreated, the bacteria can affect a person’s joints, heart, and nervous system. Photo: Leroy Baptiste 

My knees buckled beneath the weight of my malnourished adolescent frame. Cold, dripping sweat met its match on the tile floor. Every ounce of strength I had cried out to my parents for help. I didn’t stay conscious long enough to realize they raced up the stairs at the sound of my fall, as if on command.

The year was 2018. Losing consciousness was among the everyday occurrences in my middle-class household in suburban West Hartford, Connecticut. Life had been this way since July 5, 2017, just days before my 17th birthday, when my legs went fully numb during a run.

Not until I was almost 20 years old was I diagnosed with chronic and neurological Lyme disease — 16 strains of it, to be precise.

I blame this delay in diagnosis on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s refusal to recognize and legitimize chronic Lyme disease. Whereas many patients with Lyme disease can recover after two to four weeks of antibiotics, others, like me, suffer long-term side effects, and no one knows why. This lack of understanding makes it difficult for any medical professional to treat me in a Lyme-specific manner. Doctors are often reluctant to acknowledge Lyme as a possible diagnosis, and are not sufficiently informed to identify symptoms.

Lyme disease is caused by a bacteria that’s spread through tick bites. If left untreated, the bacteria can affect a person’s joints, heart, and nervous system.

Tests for Lyme disease are unreliable, often producing negative results despite patients later discovering they carry upwards of 5, 10, or 16 strains of Lyme-causing bacteria. There is no proven “cure” or treatment plan for chronic Lyme disease. Stringent criteria are required by the CDC to be diagnosed with the disease, and patients are often passed off to other autoimmune or psychiatric diagnoses.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Another harrowing story.  Fortunately, there’s a good ending as the patient got to an experienced Lyme literate doctor (LLMD) for appropriate treatment.  This really is key.  Unfortunately, insurance will typically not cover this kind of treatment due to polarity within the medical community so patients must pay out of pocket.  It’s important to understand the sordid backstory to this in order to understand that attempting to get help from mainstream medicine is like shouting at the mountain.  If you are able – GO AROUND THE MOUNTAIN.  It will save you a lot of time, money, and heart-ache in the end.

For more: