Author Archive

MMR Fails to Protect Against Measles & Destroys Natural Immunity and Dengue Vaccine Trial: More Vaccinated Kids Died Than Unvaccinated

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-2024-narrative-on-measles-

The 2024 Narrative on Measles and Measles Vaccines Falls Flat on Facts: MMR Fails to Protect Against Measles Infection and Destroys Natural Immunity

Surprising facts to put things into perspective. Measles vaccines took longer, but have failed for the same reason COVID19 vaccines have failed.

By James Lyons Weiler and Alison Fujito

More recently, in 2012, MMR vaccine coverage was 90.6%, and in 2018/19, according to the CDC, it was 91.6%. With the latest data, the CDC states that MMR vaccination rates were 93% in the 2021/2022 and 2022/2023  school years. This thoroughly refutes any claims of a “dangerous shift” (or any shift), a new movement driving it, and “political infiltration.”

Journalism used to mean “reporting the facts.” Somewhere along the way, the definition changed; the Cambridge Dictionary now defines journalism as “the work of collecting, writing, and publishing news stories and articles in newspapers and magazines or broadcasting them on the radio  and television,”  without a word about facts.  (See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

Weiler completely dismantles the CDC narrative on measles, and “vaccine” hesitancy has nothing to do with measles cases or outbreaks.

Specifically, the alleged “rise” is not a rise. It’s a 3-4 year cycle, which occurs naturally and is also due to vaccine failure and the loss of passive immunity in infants and toddlers from pregnant and breastfeeding women.

OOPs!  There’s an inconvenient truth.

Here’s another:

The article’s title and content paint vaccine-hesitant people, regardless of reason, as an “infiltrating”organized political movement. But in fact, the exact opposite is true: vaccination mandate proponents, including vaccine manufacturers, are not only an “organized political movement;” US state vaccine policies are actually driven by well-funded national political organizations like Immunization Coalition, which counts 10 vaccine manufacturers among their “corporate members,” whose state groups advertise that they meet with their state legislators to advocate for stricter vaccination laws. Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers have donated to the campaigns of at least one state senator who proposed a state bill to require all children to be vaccinated against Covid.  

Well now.  That explains some things.

For more:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/wsd-dengue-vaccine-trial-kids-deaths-childhood-obesity-lead/

Dengue Vaccine Trial: More Vaccinated Kids Died Than Unvaccinated

The Defender’s Weekly Science Digest delivers a roundup of the latest research on children’s health, including studies on vaccines, drugs, chemicals, pesticides and lead exposure.

3/8/24

The vaccine worked — but the kids died

Long-term efficacy and safety of a tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003): 4·5-year results from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; The Lancet Global Health, February 2024.

The good news: the vaccine was 61.2% effective in preventing dengue and 84.1% effective in preventing dengue-associated hospitalization.

The bad news? Nearly twice as many vaccinated as unvaccinated children died during their clinical study.

Investigators enrolled 20,099 children, ages 4-16, 50.5% males, from 26 medical or research centers in “dengue territory” — Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, Panama, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand.

Sick or highly allergic children were excluded.

The researchers administered two doses, three months apart, of an experimental, live-attenuated  dengue vaccine to 13,401 children. The vaccine, TAK-003, was developed by Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

TAK-003’s slightly superior side effect profile did not translate into the most significant safety signal of all — death — as 11 vaccinated children died during follow-up versus just 6 unvaccinated children.

In July 2023, Takeda “voluntarily” withdrew its application to sell TAK-003 in the U.S. due to discrepancies in its data collection practices, according to a Takeda press release.

Hormone Secrets

http://

 Approx. 2.5 Hours

Hormones Secrets: Feel Great and Age Well Using the Bio-Identicals

By Dr. Robert Yoho

USE NATURAL HORMONES TO STAY HEALTHY, FEEL FANTASTIC, AND AVOID OVERPRICED, TOXIC DRUGS

Are you all worn out and wonder if it’s your hormones? Do you have questions about menopause or testosterone replacement? Have you heard that hormones cause cancer and heart disease?

Hormone Secrets will clear up the controversies for you.

Robert Yoho is an award-winning author who spent a career studying and prescribing hormones. He is retired, so he can tell you the truth. Hint: big Pharma and big money are involved, and you have been listening to lies.

Are some hormones dangerous? YES, and this book explains which ones. You will go to your doctor armed with exactly what to ask for. Is hormone replacement expensive? NO, not if you learn the secrets from Hormone Secrets.

THE PROMISE: Study this book and you will know more about hormones than 99 percent of doctors. THE GUARANTEE: I will help you find a doctor who can help. Hormones are difficult for physicians to prescribe—they are pressured to use toxic, expensive patent drugs instead.

http://

Hormone Secrets Part 2

______________

For more:

Superior Efficacy of Combination Antibiotics Therapy Versus Monotherapy For Lyme Disease in Mouse Model

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1293300/full

Front. Microbiol., 20 November 2023
Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease
This article is part of the Research TopicInsights in Infectious Agents and Disease: 2023View all 11 articles

Superior efficacy of combination antibiotic therapy versus monotherapy in a mouse model of Lyme disease

Yasir Alruwaili1,2,3Mary B. Jacobs2Nicole R. Hasenkampf2Amanda C. Tardo2Celine E. McDaniel2Monica E. Embers2,3*

Lyme disease (LD) results from the most prevalent tick-borne infection in North America, with over 476,000 estimated cases annually. The disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) sensu lato which transmits through the bite of Ixodid ticks. Most cases treated soon after infection are resolved by a short course of oral antibiotics. However, 10–20% of patients experience chronic symptoms because of delayed or incomplete treatment, a condition called Post-Treatment Lyme Disease (PTLD). Some Bb persists in PTLD patients after the initial course of antibiotics and an effective treatment to eradicate the persistent Bb is needed. Other organisms that cause persistent infections, such as M. tuberculosis, are cleared using a combination of therapies rather than monotherapy. A group of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs previously shown to be efficacious against Bb in vitro were used in monotherapy or in combination in mice infected with Bb. Different methods of detection were used to assess the efficacy of the treatments in the infected mice including culture, xenodiagnosis, and molecular techniques. None of the monotherapies eradicated persistent Bb. However,

  • 4 dual combinations (doxycycline + ceftriaxone, dapsone + rifampicin, dapsone + clofazimine, doxycycline + cefotaxime)
  • 3 triple combinations (doxycycline + ceftriaxone+ carbomycin, doxycycline + cefotaxime+ loratadine, dapsone+ rifampicin+ clofazimine) eradicated persistent Bb infections.

These results suggest that combination therapy should be investigated in preclinical studies for treating human Lyme disease.

________________

**Comment**

This research demonstrates clearly why many do not get better.  Mainstream doctors are still in the Dark Ages regarding all things Lyme/MSIDS and treat with the antiquated and unscientific IDSA Lyme Guidelines which have never worked and never will.

For more:

FDA Refuses to Enforce EUA Ad Restriction. ‘Vaccine’Coercion, Lockdowns, & Mask Mandates Need to be Criminalized – Make Manufacturers Liable For Injuries Again

https://rumble.com/v4i1b5x-fda-refuses-to-enforce-eua-advertising-restriction-but-also-insists-it-must.html  Video Here (Approx. 2 Min)

FDA Refuses to Enforce EUA Advertising Restriction — But Also Insists it Must Keep the Provision!

During the pandemic, ICAN witnessed many instances where state and federal public health entities falsely referred to COVID-19 vaccines released under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) as “approved” or “safe and effective” in direct violation of federal law and the conditions of the vaccines’ EUAs. ICAN’s attorneys sent two petitions to the FDA demanding it either enforce the terms of its own EUAs that prohibit advertisements with this illegal language or rescind the advertising restrictions entirely. 

FDA chose to do neither.
Go here to see many other instances where ‘health’ agencies made unsupported claims to the public.

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/lawmakers-need-to-criminalize-vaccine?  Video Here  (Approx. 2 Min)

Criminalize vaccine coercion, lockdowns, and mandates of masks and shots now

Or you’ll be required to stay in your house, lose your livelihood, and take more possibly deadly shots in the next putative “emergency”

The Covid bioweapon operation exposed vast lies by government and media about injections, masks, and lockdowns, injuring and killing millions and enriching a few overlords.

Action needed

Tell your congressperson and senator (who will probably ignore you) and your state legislators (who might pay attention) you insist they pass laws banning injection mandates. 

And while you’re at it, tell them no more mask mandates or lockdowns, either.

[Sample letter with references:  Letter to WI reps – Banning lockdowns, masks, shots copy]

If, unlike Covid jabs, future immunizations can confidently be shown to be safe, effective, and necessary in view of a significant threat, based on data and analysis that are fully transparent and verifiable by the public, then many will choose to take the shots.

But to coerce or require such shots must be made illegal.

This goes for schools and airlines too.

Impose mandates, go straight to prison. That must be the message.

Criminal law

Here is a sample draft statute for legislators:

Anyone who deprives a person of any right or privilege on the basis of whether that person has received, ingested, or had administered any medicine, therapy, medical procedure, prophylactic, vaccine, or immunization, or worn any mask or face covering, shall be guilty of a felony subject to imprisonment for not less than five years and a fine of up to $10,000.

Government officials or corporate executives found guilty under this section shall be subject to imprisonment for between 20 years and a life term.

(See link for article and videos)

______________

**Comment**

I highly recommend reviewing the words spoken in the videos in the above article where talking heads didn’t want the unvaccinated to sit next to them, to be able to buy food or to even to be able to receive needed medical help. This history must not be forgotten or downplayed or it will happen again. People should be ashamed of the heartlessly selfish words uttered.

SUMMARY: Just the facts

That would include this lot among many others:

It is 2024 and there is STILL no cure or proven ‘vaccine’ for respiratory disease.

Never again.

______________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chip-roy-liable-act-covid-vaccine-manufacturers

New Law Would Make COVID Vaccine Makers Liable for Injuries, Deaths

Children’s Health Defense is among the organizations that support a bill introduced Tuesday by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) that would remove the liability shield for manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines and open the door for vaccine-injured Americans to sue companies like Pfizer and Moderna.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) on Tuesday introduced a bill that would allow Americans to sue the manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines for vaccine-related adverse events, including deaths by removing the vaccine makers’ liability shield.

The Let Injured Americans Be Legally Empowered Act, or the LIABLE Act, would “allow Americans who took vaccines that were misleadingly promoted and forced onto many Americans via federal mandates to pursue civil litigation for their injuries,” according to a summary of the bill publicized by Fox News.

“These vaccines were given emergency use authorization unilaterally and did not go through the normal FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] approval process,” the summary stated.

For more:

Motherload of Research Shows Graphene Oxide is Harmful but New Report Suddenly Says It is Safe

https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/graphene-oxide-nanoparticles-are

Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles are in COVID Vaccines; a new report says they are safe for humans….They are lying!

SciTechDaily calls graphene oxide nanoparticles a “wonder material” that is now “verified safe” in humans by new research.1 It further declares graphene oxide is, in bold, “A revolutionary nanomaterial with huge potential to tackle multiple global challenges could be developed further without acute risk to human health, research suggests.”

Imagine that—graphene oxide nanoparticles are “without acute risk to human health.” That would suggest it’s harmless in vaccines, at least in the short run. The medical-industrial-military complex seems bent on proving graphene oxide nanoparticles are safe — perhaps  because critical researchers have discovered them hidden in COVID “vaccines.”2

The defenders of graphene oxide nanoparticles are handicapped in making safety claims because a motherload of research going back many years finds graphene oxide and nanoparticles in general are harmful to multiple body organs, to cells, and even to life itself across a spectrum of species.  (See link for article)

_______________

SUMMARY:

  • The new study dismisses the fact the blood of the volunteers who inhaled graphene nanoparticles consistently clotted when passed through arteries removed from people with pre-existing heart disease.
  • In the first respiratory study of its kind, it only involved 14 healthy volunteers. The fact the clotting problem was found in a statistically significant number should make the report even more alarming.
  • The study authors admit their nanoparticles are far more ‘clean’ or ‘pure’ than those in commercial use – which should cause even greater concern.
  • The authors ignore the vast literature on graphene harm to living things such as a 2016 review with 240 scientific citations which came to ominous conclusions about safety, pointing out toxicity concerns and oxidative stress.
  • Lung injury due to graphene has been studied in several studies but not in other organs.
  • No further humans studies and no commercial use should be allowed until further animal studies investigate this risk.
  • Concerning the COVID genetic injections – they should have been stopped within days of their release.  The fact the J&J shots were withdrawn because of 9 deaths due to thrombosis should be the precedent; however the mRNA shots continue to be promoted despite more than 36,000 reports of death to the VAERS reporting system as of Feb, 2024.
  • The government backed the Moderna and Pfizer deadly injections because they were picked as far back as 2010 by Bill Gates as his favorite “vaccine” investments. 

For more: