Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Wisconsin Call to Action: Support SB 4 & SB 5: Prohibiting COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates By State & Local Health Officials & Employers

image001-1

SUPPORT SB 4 and SB 5: Prohibiting COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates by State and Local Health Officials and Employers

Dear Wisconsin NVIC Advocacy Team Members, 

Your action is needed to support two good bills that are scheduled for a hearing on Thursday, January 21st at 12:00 PM in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Children and Families in the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) Room on the 4th floor of the Wisconsin State Capitol.

SB 4 would prohibit the Department of Health and local health officials from mandating COVID-19 Vaccines and SB 5 would prohibit employers from mandating COVID-19 vaccines as a condition of employment. 

ACTION NEEDED:

  1. Attend the hearing on 1/21/2021 beginning at 12:00 PM in the GAR Room and offer testimony in support of SB 4 and SB 5. Due to compliance with social distancing guidelines, seating in GAR may be limited. Additional public access will be available in room 400 Northeast.
    Click for Agenda or Information on how to testify at a public hearing. 
  2. If you are unable to attend the hearing, you can send written testimony to Senator Andre Jacques, Chair of the Senate Committee on Human Services, Children and Families at Sen.Jacque@legis.wisconsin.gov.  Copies of your written testimony will be distributed to members of the committee.  
  3. Contact Members of the Senate Committee on Human Services, Children and Families and ask them to support SB 4 and SB 5.  See contact information and talking points below.  
  4. Contact your own Wisconsin State Senator and ask him/her to support SB 4 and SB 5.  If you do not know who your State Senator is, register/login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal at http://NVICAdvocacy.org.  Click on the STATE TEAMS tab and select your state. Their names are displayed on the right side of the page and you can click on their name for contact information. You can also search here.
  5. Sign up to get NVIC’s Wisconsin “Heads Up” text alerts by texting “Wisconsin” to 202-618-5488.
  6. Login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal OFTEN to check for updates and forward this email to family and friends.  Please ask them to register and share their concerns with their legislators as well. 

Senate Committee on Human Services, Children and Families Members:

André Jacques (Chair) – O – (608) 266-3512

Joan Ballweg (Vice-Chair) – O – (608) 266-0751

Eric Wimberger – O- (608) 266-5670

LaTonya Johnson – O – (608) 266-2500 – District Phone – (414) 313-1241

Melissa Agard – O – (608) 266-9170

Emails: 

Sen.Jacque@legis.wisconsin.gov, Sen.Ballweg@legis.wisconsin.gov, Sen.Wimberger@legis.wisconsin.gov, Sen.Johnson@legis.wisconsin.gov, Sen.Agard@legis.wisconsin.gov

TALKING POINTS: (please add your own experiences why these bills are important to you to customize your testimony)

  • SB 4 and SB 5 need to be passed to prevent COVID-19 vaccine mandates from denying law abiding citizens the ability to work or participate in society. 
  • COVID-19 vaccines carry the risk of injury and death for some so there has to be informed consent and the right to refuse the vaccine without penalty. As of 1/7/21, there have already been 6,758 COVID-19 Vaccine adverse events and 66 COVID-19 Vaccine deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.  
  • Some short-term and all long-term risks of new COVID-19 vaccines are still unknown.
  • A Wisconsin nursing home has already started laying off employees for refusing COVID-19 vaccines.  In other states, COVID-19 vaccine mandates in businesses,  local governments, and schools are already threatening the jobs and education of some. Wisconsin needs to get out ahead of these discriminatory practices.
  • The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission affirms the legal right of an employer to exclude the employee from the workplace even if an employee cannot get vaccinated for COVID-19 because of a disability or sincerely held religious belief and there is no reasonable accommodation possible. SB 5 will protect employees’ rights to delay or refuse COVID-19 vaccines. 
  • While the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) allows employees to decline Hepatitis B vaccines, and OSHA and many labor unions have expressed opposition to annual influenza vaccination policies that do not include religious and/or personal objection exemptions, there are no exceptions offered by OSHA for COVID-19 vaccine mandates in the workplace, so the only hope for those who don’t want the vaccine is to pass a state law preventing mandates.  
  • People injured by a COVID-19 vaccine have little recourse. Vaccine manufactures and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. This federal law establishes that the only option for compensation for COVID-19 vaccine victims is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP. No legal or medical expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. Vaccination must be voluntary.

Sincerely,

NVIC Advocacy Team
National Vaccine Information Center
http://NVIC.org and http://NVICAdvocacy.org
https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Members/ContactUs.aspx

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials.  We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register  at http://NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC. 

______________________

Watch Sharyl Attkison on Full Measure for an excellent 9 minute report on the “vaccine” mandate.

**Comment**

  • Experimental medical devices that are still in clinical trials are unproven. Pfizer‘s data will not be available until 24 months after study completion. Moderna’s data won’t come out for two years.  Oxford’s/AstraZeneca’s data won’t be available until the trail is complete. Russian Sputnik V vaccine has NO plans to share participant data.
  • Thousands of experts are warning against it.  Even Chinese experts call for its suspension.
  • Experts are stating it can cause sterilization.
  • Experts state it can destroy your immune system.
  • There have been thousands of severe adverse reactions and deaths already.
  • According to a doctor, if 6 billion get the vaccine, 167 million will be unable to work, perform daily activities, and will require care. Nothing is known about long-term effects.
  • 100% of vaccine recipients using the high dose vaccine had systemic side-effects.
  • Questions regarding the potential of chronic inflammation, mutations, DNA replication, autoimmune responses, cancer causing genes, pathogenic priming, unsafe epitopes, remain unanswered.
  • It doesn’t prevent transmission or infection.
  • Experts state mRNA goes into your genes, starts expressing itself, stimulating the immune system and that you can never get rid of it once it is in your body, making you a type of GMO.
  • Moderna admits it injects an operating system into your body.
  • Experts state the toxic metals within vaccines make our bodies into antennas with 5G.
  • Within it is a dye (Luciferace) showing who has been vaccinated, and stored in the Cloud.
  • Our medical ‘authorities’ and monitoring boards pushing it have severe conflicts of interest and stand to gain from the $30 billion per year vaccine business.
  • These same ‘authorities’ are thwarting efforts to track adverse reactions, have quietly renamed adverse reactions immune responses to quell vaccine hesitancy, have stopped counting cases of the flu to inflate COVID cases, and have been using faulty testing designed to be positive.  
  • Vaccine research is corrupted.
  • The CDC admits that few deaths are caused by COVID.
  • Scientists have demanded retraction of The Corman-Drosten foundation paper, the paper the entire house of cards is built upon.  They didn’t use a viral isolate and there are no controls. You need a viral isolate for accurate testing and an effective vaccine.
  • COVID-19 wouldn’t even be considered a ‘pandemic’ unless the WHO changed the definition.
  • There are numerous successful treatments for COVID.
  • Vaccine manufacturers have a blanket exemption from any liability & have nothing to lose.
  • The claim that “vaccines safe and effective” is meaningless; an individual risk-benefit analysis is required.  Vaccines are filled with toxic ingredients including aluminum and mercury.
  • There has never been research done on the synergistic effects and absence of studies into long-term effects of vaccinating according to the CDC’s schedule.

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Ivermectin 2021 Update With Dr. Pierre Kory & Study Finds Restrictive Lockdowns Don’t Work

https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2021/01/17/dr-pierre-korys-slides-from-unbreakingscience/

http://  Approx. 1 hour

Jan. 16, 2021

Ivermectin 2021 Update with Dr. Pierre Kory

Dr. Jack and Dr. Pierre Kory discuss NEW SCIENCE on Ivermectin – prophylactic efficacy, effective across populations – Fact Checkers take NOTE – this is NEW science, NEW information that cannot be “Fact Checked” using OLD INFORMATION.

Dr. Kory, medical director at the Trauma & Life Support Center and a faculty member in the Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in the Department of Medicine at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, is President of FLCCC (Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance).  

Dr. Kory’s slides on Ivermectin: Kory-Slides-1-16-2021

  • Similarly to HCQ, Ivermectin’s been used for nearly 40 years, has an incredible safety record and is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines:  https://list.essentialmeds.org
  • Kory’s paper he began writing in April, took attempts with SIX journals to get published, that states COVID-19 is NOT a viral pneumonia.  They are not finding cytopathic changes on autopsy in the vast  majority of cases. COVID-19 is an organizing pneumonia, which is not infectious but a response or exposure to something causing inflammation/injury in the lungs. The primary treatment for organizing pneumonia is corticosteroids.  Paper here:  https://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/bmjresp/7/1/e000724.full.pdf  Important excerpt:  

Given this likely high prevalence of OP, AFOP or both in early COVID-19, a concern is that the increasingly adopted RECOVERY trial protocol (6mg dexamethasone daily for up to 10 days) may be insufficient given that treatment of secondary OP often requires higher doses, prolonged duration of treatment, and a careful and monitored tapering.9  Thus, additional studies comparing corticosteroid type, dosing and duration should be conducted along with the use of other immunosuppressive agents. 

FLACCC came up with the MATH+ protocol in early April and received a lot of flack for it, but they’ve been proven correct.  For more on MATH+ treatment for hospitalized patients:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/02/successful-covid-19-critical-care-stonewalled-by-cdc/ and https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/26/math-protocol-shows-profound-impact-on-survival-from-covid-19/

For Dr. Kory’s testimony to the Senate on Ivermectin:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/09/i-cant-keep-doing-this-pleads-wisconsin-medical-director/

For Dr. Weiler’s testimony at the Freedom Press Conference on the COVID-19 medical device (it’s not a vaccine):  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/04/medical-freedom-press-conference-must-see-video/

_________________________

Study Finds ‘No Significant Beneficial Effect’ of Restrictive Lockdowns

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eci.13484

Abstract
Background and Aims: The most restrictive non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for controlling the spread of COVID-19 are mandatory stay-at-home and business closures. Given the consequences of these policies, it is important to assess their effects. We evaluate the effects on epidemic case growth of more restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs), above and beyond those of less restrictive NPIs (lrNPIs).
Methods: We first estimate COVID-19 case growth in relation to any NPI implementation in subnational regions of 10 countries:
  • England
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iran
  • Italy
  • Netherlands
  • Spain
  • South Korea
  • Sweden
  • US

Using first-difference models with fixed effects, we isolate the effects of mrNPIs by subtracting the combined effects of lrNPIs and epidemic dynamics from all NPIs. We use case growth in Sweden and South Korea, two countries that did not implement mandatory stay-at-home and business closures, as comparison countries for the other 8 countries (16 total comparisons).

Results: Implementing any NPIs was associated with significant reductions in case growth in 9 out of 10 study countries, including South Korea and Sweden that implemented only lrNPIs (Spain had a non-significant effect). After subtracting the epidemic and lrNPI effects, we find no clear, significant beneficial effect of mrNPIs on case growth in any country. In France, e.g., the effect of mrNPIs was +7% (95CI -5%-19%) when compared with Sweden, and +13% (-12%-38%) when compared with South Korea (positive means pro-contagion). The 95% confidence intervals excluded 30% declines in all 16 comparisons and 15% declines in 11/16 comparisons.
Conclusions: While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs. Similar reductions in case growth may be achievable with less restrictive interventions.
_______________________
**Comment**
We can be very thankful Sweden and South Korea stood up to the concerted bullying or there would have been no control group to compare lockdowns to!
For more:  

Category:

Activism, Treatment, Viruses

Chinese Health Experts Call for Suspension of COVID Vaccines As Norway Investigates 33 Deaths, Germany Probes 10 Deaths

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/china-health-experts-suspension-covid-vaccines-norway/

China Health Experts Call for Suspension of COVID Vaccines as Norway Investigates 33 Deaths, Germany Probes 10 Deaths

Norway upped the number of deaths under investigation, from 23 last week to 33, while in Germany, health officials said they are investigating 10 deaths that occurred among elderly patients who received the COVID vaccine.

China health experts say Norway and other countries should suspend the use of mRNA vaccines like those produced by Pfizer and Moderna, especially among the elderly, according to Global Times.

Norway health officials said last week they were investigating the deaths of 23 elderly people who died shortly after receiving the vaccine, and had confirmed 13 of those were directly related to the vaccine.

Today, Bloomberg reported that the number of deaths under investigation in Norway had risen to 33 and that all had occurred in people ranging from age 75 to 80. According to Bloomberg, Camilla Stoltenberg, head of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, said at a press conference today:

“It is important to remember that about 45 people die every day in nursing homes in Norway, so it is not a given that this represents any excess mortality or that there is a causal connection.”

The Norwegian Medicines Agency previously told Bloomberg that all of the deaths occurred in people who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which until Friday was the only COVID vaccine approved for use in Norway.

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, which had originally prioritized the elderly for the vaccine, has since revised its advice to urge more caution when vaccinating the elderly, especially those with underlying conditions.

The institute told Bloomberg that “for those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences. For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant.”

The Institute also admitted to Global Times that the clinical trials that resulted in emergency approval of the vaccine included “very few people over the age of 85,” but added “we assume that the side effects will largely be the same in the elderly as in those over 65 years of age.”

According to the Global Times, a Beijing-based immunologist who requested anonymity said the mRNA vaccines had not proven safe for large-scale use or for preventing infectious diseases. Noting that people over 80 have weaker immune systems, he said they should not receive the vaccine, but instead should take medicines to improve their immune systems.

Meanwhile, The BMJ and other news outlets reported last week that in Germany, the Paul Ehrlich Institute is investigating 10 deaths in people ranging in age from 79 to 93 who died shortly after receiving the COVID vaccine.

U.S. health officials continue to push COVID vaccinations in nursing homes, despite growing resistance among nursing home employees to take the vaccine.

So far, there’s no word of any investigation into the deaths of 29 elderly people at a nursing home in New York. According to a Jan. 9 news report from Syracuse.com, a single nursing home in upstate New York vaccinated 193 residents beginning on Dec. 22 and subsequently reported 24 deaths within the span of a couple of weeks.

The facility attributed the deaths to a COVID-19 “outbreak,” even though there had been no COVID-19 deaths in any nursing homes in the entire county “until the first three deaths … were reported Dec. 29.”

Florida health officials and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are investigating the death of a 56-year-old doctor who died of a rare autoimmune disease 15 days after getting the Pfizer vaccine. A Johns Hopkins scientist told the New York Times it was a “medical certainty” that the death was related to Pfizer’s vaccine.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is investigating numerous severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, in healthcare workers who received the vaccine.

Sunday night, California health officials called for a pause on the use of a huge batch of Moderna’s COVID vaccine due to its ”higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions.” As The Defender reported this morning, California’s top epidemiologist Dr. Erica S. Pan is recommending providers pause the administration of lot ‘041L20A’ of the Moderna COVID vaccine.

According to the latest figures, updated Jan. 7, from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 66 deaths have been reported in the U.S. as being possibly related to a COVID vaccine. It’s estimated that only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported to VAERS.

Anyone who suspects an injury or death related to the COVID vaccine, or any vaccine, can go to the VAERS website and file a report.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

____________________

**Comment**

Bizarrely, the head of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health’s reminder that 45 people die in nursing homes daily and that it doesn’t represent excess mortality is quite hypocritical considering the fact back in September Professor Heneghan warned that the government’s “doom mongering” scientific advisers were neglecting to tell the public there is a:

  • four-fold increase in consultations in general practice in a GOOD Year
  • 8 fold increase in an epidemic year 
  • 50% increase in deaths between Sept. and January

Yet, these facts don’t matter in the Twilight Zone of COVID-19, where our public ‘authorities’ have: 

Unfortunately, Wisconsin nursing home staff risk losing their job if they refuse the jab:  https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2021/01/15/wisconsin-nursing-home-employees-laid-off-not-taking-covid-vaccine-rock-haven/4180247001/

If you haven’t signed the petition against mandatory vaccines, please do.  It’s your body:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/01/18/petition-to-stop-forced-experimental-vaccines/

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

FREE Webinar: In For the Long Haul: Lyme & COVID-19

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/in-for-the-long-haul-lyme-covid-19-tickets

https---cdn.evbuc.com-images-122291375-478899430059-1-original.20210105-175701

Date And Time

Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:30 PM CST

Project Lyme will host Dr. Daniel Cameron, M.D., MPH and Dr. Bill Rawls, M.D. to address issues facing the Lyme community during COVID-19.

About this Event

Project Lyme will host Lyme disease expert Dr. Daniel Cameron, M.D., MPH and integrative health innovator Dr. Bill Rawls, Medical Director of Vital Plan. They will be discussing the challenges that face the Lyme community as we continue to face the pandemic including the similarities between the long-haul patients, and how to stay healthy in these uncertain times.

Noah Johnston, Administrative Director of Project Lyme will moderate the discussion and take live Q&A from the virtual crowd. The event will also feature Jennifer Hoffmann, Program Associate at Project Lyme and Senior Director of the Generation Lyme initiative. Jennifer is a Lyme patient who was dually diagnosed with COVID-19 in March of 2020.

Once you register through Eventbrite you will gain access to the private Zoom link.

Project Lyme is happy to host this educational event for free. We request you donate through https://projectlyme.org/donate/ to help us continue to provide this content.

Category:

Lyme, Viruses

New York Supreme Court Judge Saves 80-Year-Old Patient From Death By Ordering Hospital to Give Life-Saving Ivermectin

http://

Trialsite News 1/18/21

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/new-york-supreme-court-judge-saves-80-year-old-patient-from-death-by-ordering-hospital-to-give-life-saving-ivermectin/

New York Supreme Court Judge Saves 80-Year-Old Patient from Death by Ordering Hospital to Give Life-Saving Ivermectin

Jan. 15, 2020

 

Judith Smentkiewicz. Her life was spared when her family intervened, and a NY Supreme Court judge ruled against the hospital trying to murder her. Image Source.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The genocide against the elderly is in full swing right now in the U.S. and around the world.

As we have recently reported, assisted living centers who are now injecting their residents with the experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID injections are killing off many of them, particularly the oldest residents above the age of 80.

As we reported yesterday, the Norwegian Medicines Agency announced that 23 people died after receiving the experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID injections, and that is out of only 25,000 injections nationwide. All of them were over the age of 80. See:  23 Seniors Have Died in Norway After Receiving the Pfizer Experimental COVID mRNA Injection

Earlier this week we reported that a nursing home in Auburn, New York, had zero deaths attributed to COVID until they started injecting the residents with one of the experimental mRNA COVID injections, and then 24 died. See:  24 Dead and 137 Infected at NY Nursing Home After Experimental COVID Injections

The biggest tragedy in these deaths, which reveals crimes against humanity and the medical system’s low regard for the lives of our elderly, is that these experimental injections are not even needed, as there are effective and safe treatments for COVID already available, where doctors are reporting a near 100% success rate in treating their patients with early treatment.

These are older drugs already approved by the FDA (none of the mRNA COVID injections are approved by the FDA yet) for other treatments.

We have reported on these drugs extensively, such as Hydroxychloroquine, and the medical scandal behind censoring this drug for use in hospitals. See our Hydroxychloroquine page in our COVID Information Center to learn more.

Another older drug that is already approved by the FDA that many doctors have had such success in treating COVID patients, to the point where they testified before Congress and called it a “miracle drug” because it was so effective, is Ivermectin.

Dr. Pierre Kory M.D., a pulmonary and critical care specialist who is also an Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, pleaded with members of Congress to have the NIH, CDC, and FDA look at the “mountains” of data that he and his colleagues have gathered on the drug Ivermectin, which is already approved by the FDA as an anti-parasitic drug, and their success in treating COVID patients.

He stated: “If you take it, you will not get sick.” See:  “I Can’t Keep Watching Patients Die Needlessly!” Medical Professor Testifies to Congress that COVID Cure Already Exists with Ivermectin

Family Fights the Medical Industrial Complex to Save Their Mother – NY Supreme Court Judge Rules in Their Favor

 

NY State Supreme Court Judge Henry J. Nowak

The Buffalo News is reporting a story out of New York State where family members of an 80-year-old woman, Judith Smentkiewicz, did their own research after their mother was diagnosed with COVID and put on a ventilator, where she was only given a 20% chance to live.

They read about Ivermectin and convinced one of the doctors in the ICU of Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital to let her try it.

“We did a lot of our own research, we read about Ivermectin … The results sounded very promising, and we decided we had to try something different,” Michael Smentkiewicz said. “We pressured the doctor in the ICU to give it to her. He finally agreed.”

On Jan. 2, Smentkiewicz was given her first dose of Ivermectin, and according to court papers filed by her family, she made “a complete turnaround.”

“In less than 48 hours, my mother was taken off the ventilator, transferred out of the Intensive Care Unit, sitting up on her own and communicating,” Kulbacki said in a court affidavit.

However, she was soon transferred to a different section of the hospital away from the ICU, and the doctors there refused to allow her to continue taking Ivermectin.

But after her mother was transferred to another hospital wing away from the ICU, doctors in that unit refused to give her any more doses of the drug, and her condition quickly declined, the family said in court papers.

“We were astounded when they refused to give her any more doses,” Michael Smentkiewicz said. “That’s why I called Ralph Lorigo and we took the hospital to court.”

Amazingly, the hospital did not back down even when faced with a fight in court. They defended their right to deny this woman life-saving medication so they could effectively kill her!

Kaleida Health, which operates the hospital, opposed the family’s request in court. Lorigo said Kaleida attorney Michael J. Roach argued to Judge Nowak that doctors – and not the courts – should be making decisions about medical care.

What about the patient and family members?? I am sure Ms. Smentkiewicz was in favor of the treatment her children had found for her which got her off of the ventilator and out of the ICU.

But this is how the Medical Industrial Complex works. They don’t think anyone should dare to question their alleged “authority.”

Fortunately, the Judge wasn’t persuaded, and basically saved this woman’s life.

On Jan. 8, Nowak ordered the hospital to “immediately administer the drug Ivermectin” to Smentkiewicz, court papers show.

“But the judge also told us verbally that Judith’s family doctor would have to write a prescription for Ivermectin, which he did,” Lorigo said. “In 46 years as an attorney, I’ve never seen another case where a family had to get a court order to continue a treatment that had already been started by a hospital.”

“This lady was on a ventilator, literally on her deathbed, before she was given this drug,” Lorigo told The Buffalo News about Smentkiewicz, a Cheektowaga resident. “As far as we’re concerned, the judge’s order saved this woman’s life.” (Source.)

The key here for everyone to note when advocating for a loved one to receive treatment from these older drugs, is what the Judge allegedly told the family verbally: get a prescription from your family doctor.

Then it is 100% legal, and the hospital cannot do anything about it, at least not legally, because medical physicians are allowed to prescribe drugs for “off-label” use.

The doctors in the hospital that decided to withhold this drug from Ms. Smentkiewicz are not named. They should be arrested and charged with attempted murder.

The reporter for The Buffalo News, Dan Herbeck, interviewed another doctor who gave his “reasoning” for withholding this treatment:

Dr. Thomas A. Russo, one of the region’s leading experts on infectious diseases, said he was glad to hear that Smentkiewicz is doing better, but he said people should never jump to conclusions about Ivermectin or any other drug based on one patient’s outcome.

“There are some indications that this drug may have some merit in treating Covid-19 … Yes, it is possible that it helped this woman,” Russo said. “But the trials and testing are ongoing. We don’t have definitive data yet to show it does help. Presently, it is not recommended as a treatment for Covid-19.”

Russo is the chief of infectious diseases at the University at Buffalo’s Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. He has no involvement in the Smentkiewicz case.

This is the “official position” of the medical bureaucrats, which is obviously crafted to protect the FDA who has given emergency use authorization (EUA) to new experimental drugs, including the new mRNA COVID injections, which has resulted in literally $TRILLIONS in federal funding being awarded to them to develop these new COVID drugs and vaccines. Older drugs already approved by the FDA with decades of proven safety, and whose patents have long since ran out, are a threat to this new market that COVID is creating.

They also summarily dismiss all of the clinical experience and data that Professor Dr. Pierre Kory from Milwaukee, along with his group the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) have discovered.

Thanks to Dr. Meryl Nass and her blog which tipped me off to this story. If her blog is not part of your newsfeed, it should be!

If your doctor is afraid to prescribe Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine due to political pressure, Dr. Meryl Nass has a list of resources where you can find someone who can:  How you can receive early effective treatment for Covid

Some of the Frontline Doctors have also published their protocols that they have had success with:  Frontline Doctors Publish their Early Treatment Protocol for COVID

_______________________

**Comment**

Again – learn from Lyme.  We’ve been dealing with shenanigans like this for decades:  

The only difference is we don’t have a judge ordering doctors to treat us appropriately.  

We have to hunt, peck, scratch up our pennies, and travel sometimes great distances to find a doctor with enough cojones to treat us properly as state medical boards come after them.  There are many states were there isn’t ONE Lyme literate doctor.  People in other countries have it even worse.  For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/25/what-makes-a-doctor-lyme-literate/

If you haven’t noticed, we now live in the Twilight Zone, where public health ‘authorities’ will do anything to make you believe there aren’t any effective treatments for COVID, and that you must submit to their experimental medical device (it’s not a vaccine), which has caused death and serious adverse reactions: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

For an excellent article on how there are no completed clinical trials on this experimental medical device, and should you get vaccinated, you are actually a test subject in a drug trial:  https://theduran.com/what-vaccine-trials/

Stop calling it a vaccine, because it isn’t. Please see:

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/01/14/its-not-a-vaccine-its-a-medical-device-2nd-dose-of-covid-19-vaccine-will-provide-more-intense-side-effects/

Isn’t it interesting that these ‘authorities’ have no trouble at all administering an experimental medical device with ZERO completed medical trials that has NEVER been used before and is causing serious adverse reactions and even death,  but refuse to treat a dying woman who is requesting an ancient drug with an excellent safety record, a plethora of clinical data, and which already worked for her?  

Category:

Activism, Treatment, Viruses