Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

48,465 DEAD Following COVID Shots According to Whistleblower Lawsuit & Fauci Protocols Killing People

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/whistleblower-lawsuit-government-medicare-data-shows-48465-dead-following-covid-shots-remdesivir-drug-has-25-death-rate/

Whistleblower Lawsuit! Government Medicare Data Shows 48,465 DEAD Following COVID Shots – Remdesivir Drug has 25% Death Rate

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Sept. 28, 2021

Back in July of this year we reported that Ohio-based Attorney Thomas Renz was filing a federal lawsuit in Alabama based on a “sworn declaration, under threat of perjury,” from an alleged whistleblower who claims to have inside knowledge of a cover-up of reported deaths filed with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). See:

Attorney Files Lawsuit Against CDC Based on “Sworn Declaration” from Whistleblower Claiming 45,000 Deaths are Reported to VAERS – All Within 3 Days of COVID-19 Shots

Attorney Renz spoke at an event in Colorado this past weekend, and stated that more whistleblowers have now come forward, and that the death rate with those taking the COVID-19 vaccines is much higher than they originally thought.

Presenting data that he claims comes directly from the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) database, there have been 48,465 deaths among CMS beneficiaries within 14 days of a 1st or 2nd dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

There are about 59.4 million Americans covered by Medicare, representing 18.1% of the population, so these are staggering numbers!

In his presentation, Renz states that they chose deaths within 14 days of vaccination, because the federal health agencies are no longer counting deaths within 14 days of a COVID-19 as a death among the “vaccinated,” but among “unvaccinated.

Renz also presented very damning data on the drug Remdesivir, the new COVID-19 drug that was rushed to market while existing, safe and effective older drugs like Ivermectin are prohibited in hospital settings.

According to CMS data, almost 26% of people put on Remdesivir die. But it is a huge money maker for the government and Big Pharma.

By contrast, only 3.5% of people put on Ivermectin died, according to CMS data. But there are no longer any patents on Ivermectin, so it is not a money maker for the government and Big Pharma.

As attorney Renz states: “You’re being defrauded by your government!”

He also goes on to show what are allegedly documents from Pfizer that seem to suggest they knew that “shedding” occurred with their COVID-19 mRNA shots.

Here is the presentation. I have excerpted the key data he presented. This is from our Bitchute channel, and it will also be on our Rumble channel.

____________________

https://thenewamerican.com/fauci-protocols-not-covid-responsible-for-many-deaths-in-us-dr-ardis-says/v  Video Here (Approx. 17 Min)

Fauci Protocols, Not COVID, Responsible for Many Deaths in US, Dr. Ardis Says

by Alex Newman

The reason hundreds of thousands of Americans died in hospitals over the last two years was not from COVID, contrary to the media narrative, warns Dr. Bryan Ardis in this interview on Conversations That Matter with The New American magazine Senior Editor Alex Newman. Instead, many of the deaths were caused by organ failure caused by the so-called “Fauci protocols” for COVID treatment imposed on the nation by the federal government and Dr. Anthony Fauci. More specifically, the deaths were caused by the drug Remdesivir, Dr. Ardis says, citing numerous studies–including one funded by Fauci’s office–that showed the drug was causing large numbers of deaths. Acute kidney and liver failure were both listed in the very study Fauci cited to claim the controversial drug was safe and effective. One study showed more than 50 percent of patients receiving the drug were dying. Once the organs shut down, the patients are put on respirators, all but sealing their fate. Make sure to share this video with loved ones.

For more:

More on Remdesivir:

For more:

Whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/09/22/three-whistleblowers-covid-jab-exposed-patients-deserve-to-be-heard-shots-kill-more-than-they-save/

Project Veritas has also been exposing a lot of important information:

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/09/29/jj-officials-kids-shouldnt-get-covid-vaccines-but-adults-who-dont-comply-with-mandates-should-be-inconvenienced/

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Study: Pfizer Vaccine Increases Myocarditis Threefold & Chinese Cupping Shows Why

**UPDATE Feb. 17. 2022**

And this telling video details how myocarditis concerns are growing. Jefferey Jaxen goes through the VAERS data as well.  Coroner states they are dealing with multiple cases.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/09/21/pfizer-covid-vaccine-increases-myocarditis-threefold

Study: Pfizer Vaccine Increases Myocarditis Threefold

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked

September 21, 2021

pfizer covid vaccine increases myocarditis threefold

Story at-a-glance

  • A large study from Israel revealed that the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA jab is associated with a threefold increased risk of myocarditis, leading to the condition at a rate of one to five events per 100,000 persons
  • Other elevated risks were also identified following the COVID jab, including lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes), appendicitis and herpes zoster infection
  • When myocarditis occurs, it reduces your heart’s ability to pump and can cause rapid or abnormal heart rhythms that can be deadly
  • In severe cases, myocarditis can cause permanent damage to the heart muscle and lead to heart failure, heart attack, stroke and sudden cardiac death; in August 2021, New Zealand reported the death of a woman following Pfizer’s COVID-19 jab, which they believe was due to vaccine-induced myocarditis
  • Due to the risk of myocarditis, Britain’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) recommended against COVID-9 injections for healthy 12- to 15-year-olds

As the mass administration of COVID-19 jabs continue worldwide, we’re beginning to see some of the more common side effects emerging. Myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, is among them. This condition can cause symptoms similar to a heart attack, including chest pain, shortness of breath, abnormal heartbeat and fatigue.1

A large study from Israel2 revealed that the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA jab is associated with a threefold increased risk of myocarditis,3 leading to the condition at a rate of one to five excess events per 100,000 persons.4 Other elevated risks were also identified following the COVID jab, including lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes), appendicitis and herpes zoster infection.5

Pfizer COVID Jab Poses Risk to the Heart

The real-world case-control study from Israel included a mean of 884,828 people aged 16 years and older in each of two groups: one vaccinated and one control.6 The increased risk of myocarditis was clear, with researchers noting:7

“The risk appears to be highest among young men. We found that the risk of myocarditis increased by a factor of three after vaccination, which translated to approximately 3 excess events per 100,000 persons; the 95% confidence interval indicated that values between 1 and 5 excess events per 100,000 persons were compatible with our data.

Among the 21 persons with myocarditis in the vaccinated group, the median age was 25 years (interquartile range, 20 to 34), and 90.9% were male.”

When myocarditis occurs, it reduces your heart’s ability to pump and can cause rapid or abnormal heart rhythms that can be deadly. In severe cases, myocarditis can cause permanent damage to the heart muscle and lead to heart failure, heart attack, stroke and sudden cardiac death.8 In August 2021, New Zealand reported the death of a woman following Pfizer’s COVID-19 jab, which they believe was due to vaccine-induced myocarditis.9

The death prompted the Ministry of Health to issue a statement to ensure “health care professionals and consumers remain vigilant and are aware of the signs of myocarditis and pericarditis” following the jab.10

A number of studies have now found a connection between COVID-19 jabs and myocarditis. In a September-October 2021 case report with literature review, it was concluded that “the outcomes of this case scenario confirm myocarditis as a probable complication of COVID-19 vaccines.”11 Another study from Israel detailed myocarditis following Pfizer’s COVID-19 jab in six male patients with a median age of 23 years.12

A similar study published in Pediatrics13 reported seven cases of acute myocarditis or myopericarditis in otherwise healthy adolescent males. Each had experienced chest pain within four days of receiving the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 jab. Data published in JAMA Cardiology14 by physicians from the Navy, Army and Air Force also revealed a higher-than-expected rate of myocarditis in U.S. military personnel who received a COVID-19 jab.

Dr. Charles Hoffe, a family physician from Lytton, British Columbia, told health officials that his patients were suffering adverse effects from the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, including myocarditis.15 About his young, male patients, Hoffe explained, “They have permanently damaged hearts.”:16

“It doesn’t matter how mild it is, they will not be able to do what they used to do because heart muscle doesn’t regenerate. The long-term outlook is very grim, and with each successive shot, it will add more damage. The damage is cumulative because you’re progressively getting more damaged capillaries.”

Officials Advise Against Vaccination of 12- to 15-Year-Olds

Due to the risk of myocarditis, Britain’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) recommended against COVID-9 injections for healthy 12- to 15-year-olds. JCVI member Adam Finn told Reuters:17

“… the number of serious cases that we see of COVID in children this age are really very small. There are uncertainties about the long-term implications of (myocarditis), and that makes the risk-benefit balance for these children really quite tight and much tighter than we would be comfortable to make the recommendation.”

In the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is also investigating myocarditis and pericarditis, which is inflammation of the outer lining of the heart, following mRNA COVID-19 jabs, stating that more than 1,000 cases have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since April 2021.18 According to the CDC:19

“As of August 25, 2021, VAERS has received 1,377 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people ages 30 and younger who received COVID-19 vaccine …

Most cases have been reported after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), particularly in male adolescents and young adults. Through follow-up, including medical record reviews, CDC and FDA have confirmed 798 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis. CDC and its partners are investigating these reports to assess whether there is a relationship to COVID-19 vaccination.”

Despite the risk, the CDC is still advising children aged 12 and older to get the jab, and August 23, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted full approval to Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA injection, now sold under the brand name Comirnaty, for people aged 16 and older.20

FDA Lists Myocarditis on Jab’s Prescribing Information

The injection’s approval represents the fastest approval in history,21 granted less than four months after Pfizer filed for licensing May 7, 2021.22 It’s also based on only up to six months’ worth of data from 44,060 people aged 16 and older.23,24 Half of them got the shots and half initially received a placebo.

However, in the second week of December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the control group and 93% of controls opted to get the real injection rather than remain in the control group for the remainder of the trial, which is slated to continue for another two years. In their prescribing information, the risk of heart inflammation is acknowledged. As reported by STAT News:25

“The FDA’s prescribing information for the vaccine includes its associated risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation that have appeared rarely among people who’ve received the mRNA vaccines, mostly within seven days after the second shot, health officials said.

Men under 40 appear to be at higher risk than women and older men, with the highest observed risk in boys age 12 to 17.”

Further, in its approval letter for Comirnaty, the FDA orders Pfizer to conduct research to investigate the risk of inflammation in and around the heart, as voluntary reporting mechanisms are insufficient.26

The FDA accepted Pfizer’s suggested timetable for the post-approval study to evaluate incidence of heart and heart sack inflammation, which includes the submission of an interim report at the end of October 2023, a study completion date of June 30, 2025, and submission of a final report October 31, 2025.

Spike Protein in the Jab Is Inflammatory

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,27 has been bravely warning of the dangers of COVID-19 jabs, in part due to the spike protein they contain.

In its native form in SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein is responsible for the pathologies of the viral infection, and in its wild form it’s known to open the blood-brain barrier, cause cell damage (cytotoxicity) and, Malone said, “is active in manipulating the biology of the cells that coat the inside of your blood vessels — vascular endothelial cells, in part through its interaction with ACE2, which controls contraction in the blood vessels, blood pressure and other things.”28

Malone is well aware of the actions of spike protein, as he worked to identify an effective drug that worked by blocking the action of the COX-2 enzyme, which is a key inflammatory enzyme. In one of his papers, he laid out how the spike protein and another protein in the virus directly turn on COX-2 promoter in infected cells.

This awareness of the spike protein as a biologically active protein made him alert the FDA in fall 2020 about the associated risks. His FDA colleagues transferred his concerns to the FDA’s review branch, which dismissed his concerns, saying they did not believe the spike protein was biologically active and there wasn’t enough documentation otherwise. As history now reveals, they proceeded with the EUA.

It’s since been revealed, however, that the spike protein on its own is enough to cause inflammation and damage to the vascular system, even independent of a virus.29 Blood clots are another serious concern related to the spike protein. According to Hoffe:30

“[It] becomes part of the cell wall of your vascular endothelium, which means that these cells, which line your blood vessels, which are supposed to be smooth so that your blood flows smoothly now have these little spiky bits sticking out.

So it is absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form, because your blood platelets circulate around in your vessels and the purpose of blood platelets is to detect a damaged vessel and block that damage when it starts bleeding.

So when a platelet comes through a capillary and suddenly hits all these covid spikes that are jutting into the inside vessel … blood clots will form to block that vessel. That’s how platelets work.”

Hoffe has been conducting the D-dimer test on his patients within four to seven days of them receiving a COVID-19 injection and found that 62% have evidence of clotting.31

Because of the risk of the formation of blood clots in your vessels, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi,32 a retired professor, microbiologist and infectious disease and immunology specialist who, along with several other doctors and scientists, formed Doctors for COVID Ethics, went so far as to say that giving the COVID-19 injection to children is a crime: “Do not give it to children because they have absolutely no possibility to defend themselves, if you give it to your child you are committing a crime.”

As mentioned, due to myocarditis risks in youth, Great Britain’s JCVI is also taking a precautionary approach for COVID-19 injections among 12- to 15-year-olds. Wei Shen Lim, COVID-19 chair for JCVI, stated, “The margin of benefit is considered too small to support universal Covid-19 vaccination for this age group at this time.”33

___________________

https://www.brighteon.com/f56e9e0a-205e-46c8-8cc9-759c0ff456f5  Video Here (Approx. 2 Min)

Chinese Cupping “Vaccinated” Blood Shows it Becomes JELLY

Health Ranger Report

Sept. 23, 2021

This certainly explains all the blood abnormalities, blood clotting, and heart issues being experienced after the shots.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, vaccines, Viruses

J&J Officials: Kids Shouldn’t Get COVID “Vaccines,” But Adults Who Don’t Comply With Mandates Should Be ‘Inconvenienced’

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/project-veritas-covid-vaccine-investigative-series-johnson-johnson-kids/

J&J Officials: Kids Shouldn’t Get COVID Vaccines, But Adults Who Don’t Comply With Mandates Should Be ‘Inconvenienced’

Project Veritas released the third video of its COVID vaccine investigative series exposing two Johnson & Johnson officials who argue children don’t need the COVID vaccine, in part because of potential long-term side effects.
Project Veritas released the third video of its COVID vaccine investigative series.

Project Veritas released the third video of its COVID vaccine investigative series Monday exposing two Johnson & Johnson (J&J) officials who argue children do not need to take the COVID vaccine, in part because of the potential long-term side effects.

One of the exposed J&J employees, a scientist by the name of Justin Durrant, laughs about inconveniencing unvaccinated adults if they refuse to comply with mandates being imposed upon them:

“Justin Durrant, J&J scientist: Inconvenience [the unvaccinated] to the point where it’s like, ‘I might as well just f*cking do it [and take the COVID vaccine],’ you know what I’m saying? Like ‘I can’t go out of state,’ I can’t – ‘my grandma’s in Canada and I can’t visit her,’ you know what I’m saying? You can’t go to France unless you’re vaccinated — you know you’ve just got to keep doing things like that where you’re almost like a second-grade citizen if you’re not vaccinated, but I know that’s awful.

Veritas journalist: You’re almost what?

Durrant: Like a second-grade citizen, like you can’t do anything that a normal citizen can do.

Veritas journalist: A second graded citizen?

Durrant: Yeah like top grade, like the ones that get it, and the ones that just like — then you can’t do sh*t. …

Veritas journalist: So then how do we punish [the unvaccinated]?

Durrant:  I mean if you can’t work, I feel like that’s punishment enough.

Veritas journalist: People what?

Durrant: Only way people really act and comply is if it affects their pockets, like if you’re working for a big company and you’re going to lose your job, best believe you’ll be the first one in line [to take the COVID vaccine].

Veritas journalist: Right, so if you’re working for a big company and you’re about to lose your job, you’ll be the first one in line?

Durrant: Yeah.

Veritas journalist: That’s so true. That’s smart, that’s what we need to do.

Durrant: That’s what we’re doing.

Durrant said he does not recommend taking his own company’s vaccine. He asked the Veritas journalist to keep that information private.

“Don’t get the Johnson & Johnson [COVID vaccine], I didn’t tell you though,” he said.

Both Durrant and Brandon Schadt, J&J’s regional business lead, said that applying the COVID vaccine on children would not move the needle in the battle against the pandemic.

“It wouldn’t make that much of a difference” if children are unvaccinated for COVID, Durrant said.

“It’s a kid, you just don’t do that, you know? Not something that’s so unknown in terms of repercussions down the road, you know?” Schadt said.

“It’s a kid, it’s a f*cking kid, you know? They shouldn’t have to get a f*cking [COVID] vaccine, you know?”

Schadt compared J&J’s COVID vaccine efficacy to the other pharmaceutical companies.

“J&J is like stepping in the best smelling pile of sh*t you could step in,” he said.

Originally published by Project Veritas.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Why Do Some “Vaccinated” People Have Horrible Side Effects, but Others Do Not?

**UPDATE Nov. 2022**

On top of the information presented below by Dr. Ruby, please also see this important video with Dr. Ryan Cole (pathologist) who explains how many people were not negatively affected by the shots due to the vials not being kept cold enough.  This error actually protected people from potential adverse reactions and death.  He too explains that the vials are all inconsistent and have different things in them, including manufacturing debris like stainless steel, aluminium, glass, etc.  “Vaccines” are supposed to be 99.9% pure.  The COVID shots are horrifically contaminated.

https://www.brighteon.com/acc1d89e-6427-4be5-8fde-2a2dab0579bd Video Here (Approx. 3 Min)

Why Do Some Vaccinated People Have Horrible Side Effects, but Others Do Not

Dr. Ruby on the Stew Peters Show gives the following information:

  • go to ClinicalTrials.gov and look up the number to the Pfizer trial
  • Pfizer has a number of different arms in their trial
  • All 3 phases are happening at once, which is illegal according to the FDA.
  • The problem is that each phase uses the phase before it to make accurate assessments for the next phase. That isn’t happening now as all arms are occurring simultaneously.
  • There are different dosages in each arm as well as a placebo arm, which means some people aren’t getting the “vaccine” at all. Dr. Wodarg of Germany has stated previously that some injections have been found to be nothing but saline, even though people are being told they’re getting the real thing and they’ve not signed up for a formal trial. There are still a lot of unanswered questions with this roll-out and a lack of manufacturer transparency.
  • While it’s unknown if secret comparison trials are being done without our knowledge, Moderna has been working on mRNA technology for years and has been unable to solve the nanolipid toxicity problem. When the dosage was too low, the mRNA didn’t stick around long enough for the drug to work, and when too high, it became toxic. They were never able to determine an effective nontoxic dose of mRNA in nanolipid.  Source
The dosage difference and the placebo are two important reasons why some are having catastrophic adverse reactions including death and some aren’t.
  • In the booster trial there are two arms, one of which includes a dose of 100mcg, and reference to a dose of 250mcg in a redacted paper. Manufacturers are hiding data.  This important video shows that information on the booster shots remains in the dark.
  • The manufacturing companies are fraudulent by not disclosing this information to the public and informing those in the trials.  If you get the jab you are actively enrolled in an ongoing study of which you are an uninformed Guinea Pig.
  • Regarding “vaccines” being “safe and effective,” please read this informative paper on how vaccine studies as a rule are a “complete methodological mess.”
    • preclinical safety studies are often not done
    • pharmacokinetic studies are not required for vaccines
    • observation periods are extremely short – often only 5-15 days after each dose
    • placebos are practically never used (they often use other vaccines)
    • since there is not placebo, there is no true control group
    • side-effects are literally “observed,” with no blood testing, no neurological exams, or any other exams.
    • majority of clinical trials are financed by the producers
    • study reports are often too incomplete
    • only healthy people are included in trials
    • “vaccine” is declared “effective” on the basis of being able to induce the production of antibodies, but this end point does not equal protection, immunity, and efficacy.

The ongoing COVID injection trial is not providing people with informed consent. It’s all a diabolical, mass experiment that corrupt public ‘authorities’ state is “safe and effective,” despite evidence to the contrary.

http://

5 Times Big Pharma Like Pfizer Used Africans as Guinea Pigs

Nov. 2020

If you truly are concerned about racism, this right here is systemic racism of the worst sort along with the atrocity of what Bill Gates did in India and what our own government did destroying evidence showing little black boys who got the MMR vaccine on time developed autism at a much greater rate.

Why isn’t this racism addressed?  Because the golden-calf of vaccines is involved, which must not have a word uttered against it.

“Are we going to continue with discrimination and segregation in the United States of America?”  Christina Parks, molecular biologist

**UPDATE**

https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/who-heartbroken-by-congo-sex-abuse-probe-findings-2021-09-28/

WHO employees took part in Congo sex abuse during Ebola crisis, report says

By and

GENEVA, Sept 28 (Reuters) – More than 80 aid workers including some employed by the World Health Organization (WHO) were involved in sexual abuse and exploitation during an Ebola crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo, an independent commission said on Tuesday.  (See link for article)

Can you blame Africans for being skeptical of and refusing a fast-tracked, experimental “vaccine” when they continue to endure this type of abuse?
I’m with Africa.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

The Narrative is Crumbling & Israeli TV: “Vaccine” is Worthless

**UPDATE Feb. 7, 2022**

https://www.bitchute.com/video/RV4mtvHqo4sf/

What Happens Next as the COVID-19 Narrative Crumbles

Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying (both have PhDs in Biology) discuss what will happen next to the public health tyrants in the U.S. and around the world as the COVID-19 narrative continues to crumble.  What is their plan B?

https://www.brighteon.com/c39c458e-70f1-4bcf-9ae7-17e5e92bbd99  Video Here Approx. 8 Min. (Language warning at end of video)

The narrative is crumbling. Something bad and big is going on.

Health Ranger Report

“Whoever planned this. It’s all planned.” – Dr. Bhakdi

“This system being put into place is based on lies.” Dr. Yeadon

“One of our problems here is the assumption that this is like every other vaccine we’ve ever seen.  And it’s not.” – Dr. Malone

50% of health care providers are absolutely not getting this injection. We don’t trust the data. The fox guarded the hen house. The companies did their own data. – Dr. Cole

“And with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”  – Kary Mullis, creator of PCR

Israeli TV Drops BOMBSHELL: Vaccine . . . Seems Useless

World NewsDesk
In the Israeli TV news report below, the ugly truth comes out: The “vaccinated” can get and spread  COVID to others just as easily as the unvaccinated.

Read the sub-titles:

  • For 60 years of age and up, 90% of new COVID cases were in the fully “vaccinated”, while 10% were in the partially “vaccinated” or the unvaccinated.
  • viral loads in both “vaccinated” and unvaccinated are the same, indicating that both groups can transmit the disease equally. Based upon this, the reporter points out the illogic of exempting “vaccinated” people from quarantine as they are clearly transmitting disease. He also states that this topic was taken off the table in an attempt to keep motivation high for people to get “vaccinated.”
  • whistleblowers are coming forward stating the number of “vaccine” damaged is much higher than is being reported.

He continues to state the jab lowers “severe” morbidity, but this is not true. Thousands of fully “vaccinated” have cases severe enough to be hospitalized and die from, and 80% of hospitalizations and deaths are now in the “fully vaccinated” despite the CDC manipulating data and changing definitions and goalposts.  If you haven’t figured it out by now, the CDC lies.

According to Dr. Rose, 6% of all “breakthrough cases” (people contracting COVID after being fully “vaccinated”) results in death. This fact challenges manufacturer’s claims that the injections prevent death from COVID.

This short video with Dr. Ruby explains why some experience horrific reactions to the jabs and others don’t.  In sum, those getting the COVID jabs are in an ongoing clinical study.  People are assigned to different arms of the study and are receiving differing dosages – including one arm of the study getting a saline placebo.  Everyone is told and believes they are getting the “vaccine” but some are only getting salt water and some are getting dosages so low it won’t work at all.  Others are getting toxic dosages that will negatively impact them.  Think Russian Roulette on a mass scale.

It’s also important to consider antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in that those who get the jabs.  They are at risk of a paradoxical reaction that causes them to have a more serious COVID case than if they hadn’t gotten the injection at all – as was shown in all previous animal studies using this technology.  Listen to a short video of a research scientist discuss many of these topics as well as the unsafe epitopes within the jabs.

FULLY VACCINATED PEOPLE ARE 65% MORE LIKELY TO BE HOSPITALIZED & 1540% MORE LIKELY TO DIE DUE TO COVID-19 THAN PEOPLE WHO ARE UNVACCINATED

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses