Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Inside the Vaccine Trials

http://  Approx. 1 hour 10 Min

Inside the Vaccine Trials

7/30/25

This film offers an intimate look into the lives of vaccine trial volunteers. These individuals came forward with hope and trust, only to encounter serious, lasting health complications.

www.vaccinetrialstories.com

Go to link for transcript

_______________

**Comment**

I don’t think the word ‘vaccine’ should be used in the title for this piece because it’s an experimental gene therapy injection in an ongoing clinical trial.  It is not a vaccine at all.  The only reason it can legally receive that title is because the CDC changed the definition of a vaccine so mRNA would fit.

Again, people receive different things.  Some one dose, some another dose, and some don’t get the mRNA at all but a placebo.  ‘The powers that be’ were and continue to be dishonest and have led people to believe everyone is getting an effective vaccine.

But the Covid injection is ineffective, doesn’t stop infection or transmission, but actually increases your risk of infection, myocarditis, blood clots, cancer, sets you up for prion disease, and causes more harm than good.

 It’s all a crock.
Buyer beware.

For more:

An Inconvenient Study

Henry Ford Medical Center, a Detroit-based heath group, issued a cease-and-desist against the film, claiming the study wasn’t published because it failed their scientific standards, not due to a cover-up. But Del Bigtree – a multi-decade children’s health advocate and RFK advisor – disagrees, and premiered the film on October 12 anyway.

https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/  Documentary Here  (Approx. 1 hour 20 min)

An Inconvenient Study

THIS COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING

In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. That study never saw the light of day… until now.

The Study

Here is what Henry Ford stated when The HighWire reached out to them for comment about the study:

“This report was not published because it did not meet the rigorous scientific standards we demand as a premier medical research institution. Data has consistently shown vaccinations are a safe and effective way to protect children against potentially life-altering diseases.”

And here is what Henry Ford has stated publicly about the study.

Key Findings of the Study:

Compared to unvaccinated children, those who received one or more vaccines had dramatically higher rates of chronic illness:

  • 329% more asthma
  • 203% more atopic disease
  • 496% more autoimmune disease
  • 453% more neurodevelopmental disorders
    • including 228% more developmental delays
    • and 347% more speech disorders

Go here for more and to hear Lawyer Aaron Siri’s congressional testimony.

Resources

For additional resources supporting the ideas in the film, check out:

For more:

Purposely Infecting People with AGS in the Name of ‘Climate Change’

https://www.frontpagemag.com/weaponizing-ticks-academics-propose-meat-allergy-to-fight-climate-change/

Weaponizing Ticks: Academics Propose Meat Allergy to Fight Climate Change

A new level of coercion in the climate war.

Article Excerpts:

Two researchers from Western Michigan University have proposed just that in a paper ominously titled “Beneficial Bloodsucking.” Published by the journal Bioethics in July, the paper argues that intentionally spreading alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) could be ethically defensible, and perhaps even necessary, because it reduces animal suffering and combats climate change. As the authors, Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth, put it:

“Because promoting tickborne AGS prevents something bad from happening, doesn’t violate anyone’s rights, and promotes virtuous action or character, it follows that promoting tickborne AGS is strongly pro tanto (‘to that extent’) morally obligatory.”

Really? According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), AGS “is a serious, potentially life-threatening allergy,” affecting “as many as 450,000 people.”

“Whatever excuse they may concoct to justify it,” notes Cameron English, director of biosciences at the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), “deliberately releasing ticks into the environment with the intention of making people sick is unethical because it interferes with the proper functioning of their bodies.” English adds that “Crutchfield and Hereth want to infect millions of people with AGS precisely because ‘it is extremely difficult for most human beings to … forego acting on their desire to eat meat.’”

(See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

If you remember, a WEF goon has already stated this previously as a solution for ‘climate change’, another very contentious subject, with many researchers stating the entire narrative is a scam.  Last year a peer-reviewed study showed that CO2 emissions in the earth’s atmosphere can not cause ‘global warming.’

And just to be clear, an expert states:

“I assert there is no connection whatsoever between climate change and CO2– it’s all a crock of crap, in my opinion.” ~ Dr. John Clauser, 2022 Nobel physics laureate

Also see this video of Dr. Niall McCrae on ‘The Lie of Cataclysmic, Anthropogenic Climate Change.”

Please note just where the ‘climate change’ agenda can lead…..
purposely infecting people so they are forced to eliminate all animal products from their life

The the ignorantly self-righteous statements by these scientists is unbelievably staggering:

  • promoting AGS prevents something bad from happening
  • doesn’t violate anyone’s rights
  • promotes virtuous action or character

Huh?

Do they even consider the possibility that people man become infected with other life-altering pathogens which are often in ticks?  As it stands, patients must go to specialized doctors even now to even receive proper treatment and must pay out of pocket.  Imagine a whopping does of AGS on top of it all!

Already, in the name of ‘climate change,’:

  • WHO is posturing itself to be able to declare a ‘climate emergency’ anytime they wish to lock down all of life on planet earth
  • JPMorgan states that private property may need to be seized by the federal government for corporations to advance “climate” initiatives
  • the current “energy transition” away from inexpensive, reliable and very clean conventional energy toward unconventional energies such as wind and solar power that are expensiveunreliable, and deeply problematic environmentally is best described by an article in the Manhattan Institute as an unrealistic delusion
  • two independent studies found intensely noisy offshore wind projects cause hearing loss in marine mammals, turtles, and fish and compromise their ability to navigate, avoid danger, detect predators, and find prey
  • go here to watch an informative video on the staggering amount of energy and resources required to build a single wind turbine.  According to this, there are 75,633 turbines covering 45 states plus Guam and Puerto Rico. Recently there’s been a slow down due to defects that according to manufacturers can affect up to 30% of turbines which can cause anything from fires to complete breakdowns where they fall to the ground
  • elevated humpback whale mortalities have occurred along the Atlantic coast from Maine through Florida coinciding with offshore operations
  • wind and solar farms only work 30% of the time, yet the delusions continue.
  • California serves as a prime example of a state that requires conventional energy to keep the fantasy afloat, yet proponents argue this will all be well given more time, more subsidies, more magical thinking, and more pixie dust
  • under the guise of reducing “methane emissions,” 13 WEF-infiltrated nations  have agreed to engineer global famine by abolishing agricultural production and shutting down all farms to ‘save the planet.’  The U.S. is one of those nations.
  • globalists’ fraudulent solutions to the purported climate crisis is Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) investing. A company’s ESG score is supposed to tell investors how socially conscious the company is, but recent scandals have revealed ESG is a scam.
If you wondered where the ‘climate’ narrative is going to go, wonder no more.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2025/05/15/red-meat-allergy-surges-as-wefs-human-engineering-blueprint-becomes-reality/  Gelatin-containing ‘vaccines’ have also been linked to causing severe anaphylaxis in some.  A few factoids:

For more on AGS:

Revolving Door Strikes Again

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-revolving-door-strikes-again?

The Revolving Door Strikes Again

Why did the FDA relentlessly suppress all evidence of vaccine injuries?

Many individuals I’ve spoken to believe Peter Marks is the government official most directly responsible for the entire COVID catastrophe, and those I know who directly interacted with him despise him. For that reason, six months ago, I published a detailed exposé of his conduct throughout the pandemic, both to highlight the systemic issues within our healthcare bureaucracy that must be fixed and to disincentivize other health officials from following in his footsteps. Since that time:

•Despite immense industry pushback, he was replaced with MAHA appointee Vinay Prasad

•Marks has made statements on the national media which display either a profound degree of ignorance of vaccines or a cult-like devotion to them, such as telling CBS the MMR vaccine absolutely does not cause encephalitis—despite this specific injury being one of the only vaccine injuries the Federal Government acknowledged as real and eligible for compensation when it created the the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.

Note: the primary reason DMSO (a safe and affordable substance with remarkable therapeutic applications against a wide range of “incurable” ailments) never entered mainstream medical practice was because the FDA, feeling DMSO’s broad therapeutic potential threatened their control of American medicine, waged a multi-decade war against it despite widespread opposition from the public, Congressmen, scientists and physicians across the country. One journalist who interviewed the successive FDA commissioners throughout this saga was struck by how “lacking [they were] in solid information about the most spectacular and controversial drug of our time” and how often they simply quoted nonsensical misinformation the FDA had previously put out about the drug without a basic understanding of it—something I would argue also applies to Peter Marks.

•Yesterday, it was announced that Peter Marks had started working with Eli Lilly, where he will oversee molecule discovery and infectious diseases at Lilly. While his salary has not been publicly announced, the AI systems I queried said given the existing precedent, he would likely get 2-6 million this year (a big upgrade from his roughly $200,000.00 FDA salary)—and possibly much more (e.g. 10-15 million).

This understandably enraged the vaccine injured parties who directly interacted with Marks over the last four years, so I felt it was important to revisit exactly what Marks did and discuss the broader revolving door in regulatory medicine.

Note: last year, the FDA approved Eli Lilly’s anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (granting the application Fast Track, Priority Review, and Breakthrough Therapy designations). I showed in last weekend’s article, that these costly drugs do close to nothing (they may slightly slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease) while simultaneously creating a variety of severe symptoms including giving over a quarter of recipients brain bleeds and brain swelling—yet remarkably, safer and much more effective Alzhemier’s therapies have languished in obscurity. (See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

I’m with Rodney Dangerfield on TOBAL,

“There Oughta be a law!”

For more:

Top Studies Caught Twisting Data To Make Clot Shots Appear ‘Safe & Effective’

https://slaynews.com/news/top-studies-twisted-data-covid-vaccines-appear-safe-effective/

Top Studies Caught Twisting Data to Make Covid ‘Vaccines’ Appear ‘Safe and Effective’

An explosive investigation has confirmed that leading medical journals published several early studies in 2020 that twisted safety data to deceitfully declare Covid mRNA “vaccines” to be “safe and effective.”

The scientists behind the investigation warn that the studies were so obviously manipulated to favor “vaccine” makers that they were “biased by design.”

Alarmingly, these highly cited studies helped to hide the dangers linked to the “vaccines” before they were rolled out for public use in early 2021.

The bombshell new analysis found that the studies deliberately downplayed deadly heart risks tied to both Pfizer’s mRNA shot and AstraZeneca’s viral-vector injection.

The new study of the old data was conducted by scientists from Children’s Health Defense  (CHD) and the Brownstone Institute.

The researchers reanalyzed U.K. government data that underpinned some of the most influential Covid “vaccine” safety studies in the world.

Their findings confirm what critics have long warned.

Instead of protecting the public, top scientific institutions twisted the data to reassure the world of “vaccine” safety while ignoring and even hiding alarming red flags.

The reanalysis found clear safety signals that were evident in the original data.

However, these safety signals were deliberately ignored in published studies.

(See link for article and studies)

_____________

**Comment**

It’s actually much worse….

  • A new study concludes that ALL COVID shots & boosters increase cancer risk.
  • A FOIA reveals that the CDC scrambled to control the public’s perception of the experimental gene therapy shot by crafting public messaging that downplayed any and all concerns.
  • The CDC thwarted efforts to track COVID shot adverse reactions and admits it never monitored for ‘safety signals.’
  • The CDC also hid injuries people received after the shot.
  • The White House and the CDC knew the shots were causing myocarditis in 2021 but lied about it.
  • The FDA refused to release autopsy results on people who died after the shots.
  • When the CDC finally released the VAERS analysis due to a FOIA, there were clear safety signals for death and a range of highly concerning thrombo-embolic, cardiac, neurological, hemorrhagic, hematological, immune-system and menstrual adverse events (AEs) among U.S. adults.
  • The CDC manipulated VAERS data by arbitrarily excluding thousands of reports and by comparing deaths after ‘vaccination’ to deaths during a pandemic – a meaningless distortion.  They should have compared vaxxed to unvaxxed.
  • Steve Kirsch showed that by having a policy of COVID testing where it is mandatory to test the unvaccinated 2x/week but the vaccinated can totally skip testing, massively skewed all studies based on that data making an ineffective ‘vaccine’ look perfect.  The honest way to see if a ‘vaccine’ is working is to compare whole period all-cause mortality between those who got the shots and those who did not.
  • Due to another brave whistleblower, we learn that OSHA confirmed an internal directive telling healthcare employers NOT to report or track COVID shot injuries.
  • Adding insult to injury, the Ohio Supreme Court rejected a public records request seeking data on COVID-19 deaths and vaccinations. This allows critical information to remain buried.

So not only did the FDA and CDC bury alarming safety risks linked to the clot shots, with states now following suit, they underestimated risks through flawed statistical methods, suppression of safety alerts, and outright data gaps.

Never trust these agencies again and buyer beware!