https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/vaccinated-children-are-sicker-study-shows/

by Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.
JenniferMargulis.net

Study here:  https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/htm

Excerpts:

Breaking science news: Vaccinated children are sicker than their unvaccinated peers, according to a landmark new study on vaccine safety: “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination.”

For over two decades, vaccine safety advocates have wondered if vaccinated children are sicker or healthier than their unvaccinated peers. These children’s health advocates have asked the CDC to conduct studies to compare health outcomes in completely unvaccinated children to those in vaccinated children, as per the CDC’s recommended schedule.

Every parent in America, and every doctor recommending vaccines, should want to see these studies done.

After all, in order to put the vaccine debates to rest, we must demonstrate that the current CDC-recommended vaccine schedule is actually safe.

But, despite constant hand-wringing over declining public confidence in vaccines, the CDC refuses to do these studies.

James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. and Paul Thomas, M.D.’s analysis is scrupulous and thorough. They analyzed the data several different ways to account for potentially confounding factors, such as an increasing tendency to avoid vaccination. They compared the new metric (RIOV) with the old measure of incidence. And they found that the new method correlates well but is more sensitive, thus more likely to reveal a true negative effect than the old one.

So what did Drs. Lyons-Weiler and Thomas find?

The results: cumulative office visits for the following health issues were all much higher in vaccinated children than unvaccinated children for the following:

  • asthma
  • allergic rhinitis
  • breathing issues
  • behavioral issues
  • ADHD
  • respiratory infection
  • otitis media
  • ear pain
  • other infections
  • eye disorders
  • eczema
  • dermatitis

In even the most conservative analysis, the study finds statistically significant elevated risks of anemia and respiratory virus infection in the vaccinated children.

Read the full article at JenniferMargulis.net.

Comment on this article VaccineImpact.com.

Researchers at IPAK (The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge) are currently working on Phase 2 of the study.

https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/htm

Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination

1The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, Pittsburgh, PA 15101, USA
2Integrative Pediatrics, Portland, OR 97225, USA
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(22), 8674; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228674
Received: 23 October 2020 / Revised: 14 November 2020 / Accepted: 18 November 2020 / Published: 22 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Children’s Health)
Abstract
We performed a retrospective analysis spanning ten years of pediatric practice focused on patients with variable vaccination born into a practice, presenting a unique opportunity to study the effects of variable vaccination on outcomes. The average total incidence of billed office visits per outcome related to the outcomes were compared across groups (Relative Incidence of Office Visit (RIOV)). RIOV is shown to be more powerful than odds ratio of diagnoses. Full cohort, cumulative incidence analyses, matched for days of care, and matched for family history analyses were conducted across quantiles of vaccine uptake. Increased office visits related to many diagnoses were robust to days-of-care-matched analyses, family history, gender block, age block, and false discovery risk. Many outcomes had high RIOV odds ratios after matching for days-of-care (e.g., anemia (6.334), asthma (3.496), allergic rhinitis (6.479), and sinusitis (3.529), all significant under the Z-test). Developmental disorders were determined to be difficult to study due to extremely low prevalence in the practice, potentially attributable to high rates of vaccine cessation upon adverse events and family history of autoimmunity.
  • Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to 0.063% of the (partially and fully) vaccinated.

The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling. Our results give agency to calls for research conducted by individuals who are independent of any funding sources related to the vaccine industry. While the low rates of developmental disorders prevented sufficiently powered hypothesis testing, it is notable that the overall rate of autism spectrum disorder (0.84%) in the cohort is half that of the US national rate (1.69%). The practice-wide rate of ADHD was roughly half of the national rate.

The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.

___________________

**Comment**

The CDC purposely avoids doing or even looking at research which might expose things that conflict with their narrative and their financial conflicts of interest.

Vaccines and Lyme disease have been around for decades but the research on both is extremely biased and poorly designed (for a pre-determined outcome).  Please note that the vaccine research in this post was independently done, just as good research for Lyme/MSIDS is also independently done. Mainstream research has been hijacked and is little more than propaganda, with the media only regurgitating what they are told to:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/12/former-french-health-minister-blows-whistle-criminal-pressure-from-bigpharma-on-publications-means-theres-no-longer-any-real-science/

For more: