Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Monkeypox: Scapegoat for COVID Shot Adverse Reactions?

No More Monkey Business

Video here:  https://besovereign.com/greenmedinfo  (Approx. 53 Min)

Published May 26, 2022

Andrew Kaufman M.D. drops logical common sense in a three-step approach to dispel the latest misplaced fears fed by media hype on MonkeyPox. Andy carefully dissects the isolation papers cited by Monkeyplot fear agitators in the mainstream, and concludes by helping people to understand pox skin reactions under the lens of the terrain perspective.

Sign Up for my FREE newsletter > https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/

__________________

https://rumble.com/v166hfw-is-monkeypox-a-scapegoat-for-adverse-events-symptoms-are-similar-to-those  Video Here  (Approx. 20 sec)

Is Monkeypox a Scapegoat for Adverse Events? Symptoms Are Similar to Those of the ‘Vaccine’

May 26, 2022

Mariazeee: “The [monkeypox] illness begins with symptoms of fever, headache, muscle aches, swollen lymph nodes, chills, and exhaustion…. symptoms that really are just the flu…”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Or they could be symptoms after you take a vaccine!”

Full Video: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/05/dr-peter-mccullough-john-leake-the-truth-about-monkeypox-who-pandemic-treaty-fear-tactics/

For more on VAERS data and mounting adverse reactions and death reports after COVID shots:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

__________________

https://rumble.com/v168ed3-monkeypox-aint-cutting-it-the-perpetrators-overplayed-their-hand-and-now  Video Here (Approx. 1.5 Min.)

Monkeypox Ain’t Cutting It: The Perpetrators Overplayed Their Hand and Now They Have a Problem

Published May 26, 2022

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:

“We’re really, really close, in my view, to a tipping point…. you can see their desperation in the fact that they’re trying to play the same story over again! Monkeypox is nothing but Corona 2.0, and that just shows you that they’re hard-pressed to come up with something that’ll keep people in panic mode. Therefore, I think they’re going to need that other narrative to kick in very quickly…”

Video via https://t.me/childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

Full Video: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/05/the-globalists-go-into-panic-mode-after-overplaying-their-hand-dr-reiner-fuellmich-joins-alex-jones-to-discuss-the-tipping-point-video-interview/

____________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Moderna ‘Throwing 30 Million Doses in the Garbage’ As Mounting Death, Injury, and Waning Efficacy Data Pours In, But Similarly With Lyme Vaccine – Makers Predictably Blame ‘Lack of Demand’

https://www.theepochtimes.com/moderna-throwing-30-million-doses-in-the-garbage-over-dwindling-vaccine-demand-ceo  Audio Here

Moderna ‘Throwing 30 Million Doses in the Garbage,’ CEO Says

By Katabella Roberts
Updated: May 26, 2022

The CEO of pharmaceutical and biotechnology company Moderna, Stéphane Bancel, said the company is having to “throw away” millions of doses of COVID-19 vaccines because “nobody wants them.”

Bancel made the comments during an appearance at the World Economic Forum on Monday, while noting his concerns over the lack of people getting vaccinated and waning immunity among those who have had the shots but declined to get boosters.  (See link for article)

___________________

**Comment**

Please compare that with the official word that Lymerix was also pulled off the market due to “lack of demand.”

That’s an interesting spin.

When you go down the deep, dark rabbit hole for truth you learn LYMERix can cause symptoms similar to NEUROSYPHILLIS, or tertiary syphilis, causes auto antibodies ANA, autoimmune diseases and more.  Further, PATIENTS WHO ARE HLA-DR4, are more likely to manifest reactions which means that in your immunological composition you have an antigenic marker or ALLELE DENOMINATED DR4, which is determined with a blood test and If you are a carrier, you will have more side effects.

According to this insightful article, Dr. Laptenta states:

“the LABORATORY DOES NOT KNOW OF THIS FACT, IT ALSO DID NOT KNOW THAT PATIENTS EXPOSED TO LYME DISEASE SHOULD NOT BE VACCINATED AS A RISK FACTOR, this was discovered by the VAERS system (system for reporting adverse events) and published on Jan. 31, 2001 when 1,440,000 doses of LYMErix was released.”

But, similarly to the history of Lymerix, ‘officials’ simply ignore VAERS reports for the COVID shots which show more adverse reactions and deaths than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS, yet they continue to deny any link to the gene therapy injections, just as ‘authorities’ deny any link between the Lyme-like symptoms people became saddled with after getting Lymerix.

Don’t ever accept any blame, just find a scapegoat.

Regarding COVID gene therapy injections, autopsies are showing higher viral loads in the “vaccinated” with evidence of a pathological outcome, especially in the immunocompromised.  But ‘authorities’ don’t care.  In fact, Fauci initially ordered that autopsies were not to be done on those with COVID.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/deaths-injuries-waning-efficacy-covid-vaccines

Deaths, Injuries and Waning Efficacy: The Latest Bad News on COVID Vaccines

Considering the mounting evidence of adverse effects and lack of effectiveness, some physicians and health agencies are calling for the immediate withdrawal of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Story at a glance:

  • A previously healthy 36-year-old mother of two died 11 days after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 shot; her death was deemed to be caused by myocarditis due to the shot.
  • Emergency calls for cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome increased more than 25% among 16- to 39-year-olds from January to May 2021, compared to the same time period in 2019 and 2020.
  • Pfizer deliberately excluded pregnant women from COVID-19 shot trials; the recommendation that the shots are safe and effective for pregnant women was based on a 42-day study involving 44 rats.
  • Research conducted by the New York State Department of Health found the shots’ effectiveness declined rapidly among 5- to 11-year-olds, falling from 68% to just 12%.
  • Considering the adverse effects and lack of effectiveness, many have called for an immediate withdrawal of the shots.

A previously healthy 36-year-old mother of two died 11 days after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 shot. Initially, her cause of death was deemed inconclusive, but at an inquest, pathologist Dr. Sukhvinder Ghataura explained that he believes the COVID-19 shot was to blame.

He told the coroner:

“On the balance of probabilities, she had vaccine-related problems. There is nothing else for me to hang my hat on. It is the most likely reason, in my conclusion. It is more than likely Dawn died in response to the Covid jab.”

Government officials continue to deny deaths linked to Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 shot.

In the U.S., they’ve acknowledged only nine deaths as causally associated with Johnson and Johnson’s COVID-19 shot as of May 10. But this case, which occurred in the U.K., highlights the potential dangers of shot-induced myocarditis.

According to Ghataura, the woman had several signs of myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, including inflammation of the heart, fluid in the lungs and a small clot in her lungs.

She had also reported menstrual irregularities, jaw pain and arm pain. When asked by a family member whether he believed the woman would still be alive today if she hadn’t received the shot, Ghataura said, “It’s a difficult question but I would say yes.”

COVID-19 shots increase heart attack risk by 25% in youth

At the conclusion of the inquest regarding the woman’s death, assistant coroner Alison McCormick stated, “I give the narrative conclusion that her death was caused by acute myocarditis, due to recent Covid-19 immunization.”

Myocarditis is a recognized adverse effect of mRNA COVID-19 shots and one that has been named in other deaths.

Dr. Neil Singh Dhalla, a CEO of a major health clinic, fell asleep four days after he got a COVID-19 booster shot — and died from a heart attack.

The autopsy stated myocarditis. He was only 48 years old and had never had heart problems in his life. In another example, epidemiologists confirmed that two teenage boys from different U.S. states died of myocarditis days after getting the Pfizer shot.

Both had received second doses of the shot. In a study that examined the autopsy findings, it’s reported that the “myocarditis” described in the boys’ deaths is “not typical myocarditis pathology”:

“The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances are different from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a known feedback loop with catecholamines may help guide screening and therapy.”

An astounding study published in Scientific Reports further revealed that calls to Israel’s National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome increased more than 25% among 16- to 39-year-olds from January 2021 to May 2021, compared to the same time period in 2019 and 2020.

The researchers evaluated the association between the volume of the calls and other factors, including COVID-19 shots and COVID-19 infection, but a link was only found for the shots:

“[T]he weekly emergency call counts were significantly associated with the rates of 1st and 2nd vaccine doses administered to this age group but were not with COVID-19 infection rates.

“While not establishing causal relationships, the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals.”

COVID shots weren’t tested on pregnant women

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Pfizer attempted to hide COVID-19 shot clinical trial data for 75 years. “When I saw that, that’s when I got very vocal and said fraud has occurred. How do I know that? They won’t show us the clinical data,” former Blackrock portfolio manager Edward Dowd said.

This should be a red flag for all Americans.

Now that a lawsuit forced the FDA to release thousands of the documents, data about what they were trying to hide is coming out. Among the revelations is evidence that Pfizer deliberately excluded pregnant women from COVID-19 shot trials.

So how did they make the recommendation that the shots are safe and effective for pregnant women? This was based on a 42-day study involving 44 rats.

What’s more, a Pfizer-BioNTech rat study revealed the shot more than doubled the incidence of preimplantation loss and also led to a low incidence of mouth/jaw malformations, gastroschisis (a birth defect of the abdominal wall) and abnormalities in the right-sided aortic arch and cervical vertebrae in the fetuses.

A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sponsored study that was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected “presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy,” according to the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK).

When the risk of miscarriage was recalculated to include all women injected prior to 20 weeks gestation, the incidence was seven to eight times higher than the original study indicated, with a cumulative incidence of miscarriage ranging from 82% to 91%.

Also buried in one of the documents is the statement, “Clinical laboratory evaluation showed a transient decrease in lymphocytes that was observed in all age and dose groups after Dose 1, which resolved within approximately one week …”

What this means is Pfizer knew that in the first week after the shot, people of all ages experienced transient immunosuppression, or put another way, a temporary weakening of the immune system, after the first dose.

Pfizer and FDA knew vaccines were not ‘safe and effective’

“It looks to me — this is not an overstatement from what I’ve seen — that this was a clinical trial that by August 2021, Pfizer and the FDA knew was failed, the vaccines were not safe and effective,” said investigative author Naomi Wolf. “That they weren’t working. That the efficacy was waning … and that they were seriously dangerous. And they rolled it out anyway.”

Regarding the shots for pregnant women, Wolf said, in an interview with Stephen Bannon on “War Room,” that a spike in severe adverse events among pregnant women coincides with the rollout of COVID-19 shots.

U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) whistleblowers datamined the DOD health database, revealing significant increases in rates of miscarriage and stillbirths, along with cancer and neurological disease, since COVID-19 jabs rolled out. “This is honestly one of the wors[t] things I’ve ever, ever seen in my 35 years as a reporter,” Wolf said.

Not only does IPAK’s data show COVID-19 injections prior to 20 weeks are unsafe for pregnant women, but 12.6% of women who received it in the third trimester reported Grade 3 adverse events, which are severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening.

Another 8% also reported a fever of 38 degrees C (100.4 degrees F), which can lead to miscarriage or premature labor.

Young children are also developing severe hepatitis and nobody knows why.

COVID-19 shots have been linked to cases of liver disease and liver damage following the shots has been deemed “plausible.”

Confirmed: COVID shots affect menstrual cycles

It’s clear that there are many unknowns about how COVID-19 shots affect pregnancy and reproduction, including their effects on menstrual cycles. Women around the globe have reported changes in their menstrual cycles following COVID-19 shots, and health officials have tried to brush off the reports or label them all as anecdotal.

But a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology — and funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Office of Research on Women’s Health — confirms an association between menstrual cycle length and COVID-19 shots.

Clinical trials for COVID-19 shots did not collect data about menstrual cycles following injection, and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) does not actively collect menstrual cycle information either, making it difficult to initially determine whether the shots were having an effect.

Anecdotal reports on social media, however, are numerous and, according to the study, “suggest menstrual disturbances are much more common …”

The Obstetrics & Gynecology study involved 3,959 individuals between the ages of 18 and 45 years. Those who had not received a COVID-19 shot noted no significant changes in cycle four during the study compared to their first three cycles.

Those who received COVID-19 shots, however, had longer menstrual cycles, typically by less than one day, when they received the shots. The longer cycles were noted for both doses of the injection, with a 0.71-day increase after the first dose and 0.91-day increase after the second dose.

While the researchers described the change as not clinically significant, meaning it’s not notable from a health standpoint, there were some women who experienced even greater menstrual changes, particularly those who received two shots in the same menstrual cycle.

These changes included a two-day increase in cycle length and, in some cases, changes in cycle length of eight days or more.

Pfizer shot only 12% effective in children

Adding insult to injury, research conducted by the New York State Department of Health shows the dismal reality about the effectiveness of COVID-19 shots in children.

From Dec. 13, 2021, to Jan. 24, 2022, they analyzed outcomes among 852,384 children aged 12 to 17 years, and 365,502 children aged 5 to 11 years, who had received two doses of the shots.

Effectiveness declined rapidly among 5- to 11-year-olds, falling from 68% to just 12%.

Protection against hospitalization also dropped, from 100% to 48%. Among 11-year-olds alone, vaccine effectiveness plunged to 11%.

The lackluster response was blamed on the dosage discrepancies among the age groups, as 5- to 11-year-olds receive two 10-microgram Pfizer shots, while 12- to 17-year-olds receive 30-microgram shots.

In the younger age group, the shots provided almost no protection at all.

And it’s not only children who are affected by the shots’ rapidly waning effectiveness.

COVID-19 booster shots also lose effectiveness rapidly, with protection plummeting by the fourth-month post-shot. One CDC-funded study involved data from 10 states collected from Aug. 26, 2021, to Jan. 22, 2022, periods during which both delta and omicron variants were circulating.

Visits to emergency rooms and urgent care facilities, as well as hospitalizations, among people seeking medical care for COVID-19, were analyzed. The study did not include milder COVID-19 cases, for which no medical attention was sought.

While initially vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated emergency department or urgent care visits and hospitalizations was higher after the booster shot, compared to the second COVID-19 injection, effectiveness waned as time passed since vaccination.

Within two months of the second COVID-19 shot, protection against the emergency department and urgent care visits related to COVID-19 was at 69%. This dropped to 37% after five months post-shot. The low effectiveness five months after the initial shot series is what prompted officials to recommend a booster dose — and the third shot “boosted” effectiveness to 87%.

This boost was short-lived, however. Within four to five months post-booster, protection against the emergency department and urgent care visits decreased to 66%, then fell to just 31% after five months or more post-booster.

Considering the adverse effects and lack of effectiveness, many have called for an immediate withdrawal of the shots.

IPAK believes the data are already compelling enough to withdraw the shots for vulnerable populations, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, children and those of child-bearing age.

Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., a prominent toxicologist and molecular biologist who works with M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston spoke at the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting held on April 23, 2021, and also called for “all gene therapy vaccines” to “be halted immediately due to safety concerns on several fronts,” including fertility.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, vaccines, Viruses

WHO Withdraws 12 of Biden’s “Sovereignty” Amendments to IHR; May Revisit Them Later

https://thenewamerican.com/who-withdraws-12-of-bidens-sovereignty-amendments-to-ihr-may-revisit-them-later/

WHO Withdraws 12 of Biden’s “Sovereignty” Amendments to IHR; May Revisit Them Later

by Veronika Kyrylenko

The global backlash against the proposed amendments to the WHO’s International Health Treaty (IHR) — which would have ceded national sovereignty over to globalists — along with legal actions in the United Kingdom have resulted in almost all of those amendments being dropped for the time being. There is nothing, however, to prevent the global overlords from revisiting the agenda.   

According to independent journalist James Roguski, who monitored the hearings, 12 of the 13 amendments submitted by the Biden administration for a vote in the World Health Assembly (WHA) this week in Geneva have been removed from consideration.

On his substack post explaining the developments, Roguski added that it is crucial to keep pushing against the global power grab by urging legislators to take action, and by spreading the word and sharing the information “WITH EVERYONE.”  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

While this is indeed good news, don’t fall asleep.  Similarly to the disbanding of Biden’s ‘Disinformation’ Board and Scary Poppins’ resignation, ALL of this dystopian tyranny can return at any time, and undoubtedly will.

For Lyme/MSIDS patients who wonder what this has to do with the plight of patients, the answer is EVERYTHING!  If you think it’s hard to find a LLMD now, just wait until this tyrannical group completely censors and bans ALL doctors that do not follow “consensus” based medicine which is short-hand for “group-think.”  Just reflect for a moment upon the mishandling of COVID and the censoring and banning of effective treatments, requiring patients to seek help in the court of law to obtain life-saving treatments which are needlessly banned.

SUMMARY:

  • The public inundated the WHO and their representatives with objections to the amendments.
  • The removal of a dozen amendments was due to legal action filed in the U.K. by Dr. Zac Cox.
  • The only remaining amendment to Article 51 is the one the Biden Admin. really wanted which would shorten the amount of time to reject amendments to 6 months rather than the current 18.
  • Journalist James Roguski states the workings of the group are not transparent and in January the Biden administration submitted a proposal that seeks to amend 13 articles within the IHR, a treaty the United States ratified back in 2005. Details were only recently released publicly with no media coverage sometime in April.
  • The group will meet again in November on how the IHR should be amended, so this isn’t over.
  • The amendments would give the WHO unparalleled authority such as:
    • classifying any disease outbreak as a public health emergency, even if they aren’t infectious.
    • imposing whatever ‘healthcare’ measures they deem necessary including lockdowns, mask mandates, travel restrictions, ‘vaccine’ mandates, etc. and national governments wouldn’t have a say in the matter – completely overruling sovereignty.
    • partnering with sister agencies of the UN and overseeing global human activities relating to food production and distribution, education, and travel.

___________________

Go here to sign the petition to nullify the ‘Pandemic’ Treaty and IHR amendments:  https://jbs.org/alert/nullify-the-whos-pandemic-treaty-and-ihr-amendments/

Go here to sign the Organic Consumers Association petition: “Stop the World Health Organization’s Global Pharmagarchy.”

For more:

_____________________

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/05/25/gates-who-global-takeover

Bill Gates Lays Out Plan for Global Takeover

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked May 25, 2022

Story at-a-glance

  • The World Health Organization is attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and response and, ultimately, all health care decisions
  • Bill Gates intends to play a key part in this takeover. He’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team, which will have the authority to monitor nations and make pandemic response decisions, such as when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness
  • The globalist cabal plans to seize control through biosecurity governance, and they’re attempting to do this using two different avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we’ll end up under totalitarian governance
  • The first attack comes in the form of amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), which are currently being voted on by the World Health Assembly. These amendments will strip member nations of their sovereignty and give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict your medical freedoms and civil liberties in the name of biosecurity. Get involved and urge your nation’s leaders to reject the amendments if passed. Unless rejected, they will become binding law in November 2022
  • The second attack comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom

In “The Corbett Report”1, independent journalist James Corbett reviews the contents of Bill Gates’ book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.”

“It’s every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible as you would expect,” he says. “This is a ridiculous book … There’s certainly nothing of medical or scientific value in here … It’s a baffling book even from a propagandistic perspective …

Gates’ goal in writing the book is to disarm the public and prepare us to accept the agenda that Gates and his allies would like to impose on the world. Ultimately, what this is about is drumming up general public support — or at least general public understanding — of the unfolding biosecurity agenda.”

Another reviewer of Gates’ book, economist Jeffrey Tucker, offered similarly negative feedback:2

“Imagine yourself sidled up to a bar. A talkative guy sits down on the stool next to you. He has decided that there is one thing wrong with the world. It can be literally anything. Regardless, he has the solution.

It’s interesting and weird for a few minutes. But you gradually come to realize that he is actually crazy. His main point is wrong and so his solutions are wrong too. But the drinks are good, and he is buying. So you put up with it. In any case, you will forget the whole thing in the morning.

In the morning, however, you realize that he is one of the world’s richest men and he is pulling the strings of many of the world’s most powerful people. Now you are alarmed. In a nutshell, that’s what it’s like to read Bill Gates’s new book ‘How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.’”

Gates’ Book Chapter by Chapter

Corbett goes through Gates’ book chapter by chapter, so if you’re short on time, you can review the ones that interest you the most:

Chapter 1: Learn from COVID (timestamp: 12:58)

Chapter 2: Create a pandemic prevention team (timestamp: 18:23)

Chapter 3: Get better at detecting outbreaks early (timestamp: 26:21)

Chapter 4: Help people protect themselves right away (timestamp: 31:01)

Chapter 5: Find new treatments fast (timestamp: 37:26)

Chapter 6: Get ready to make vaccines (timestamp: 39:46)

Chapter 7: Practice, practice, practice (timestamp: 47:06)

Chapter 8: Close the health gap between rich and poor countries (timestamp: 50:49)

Chapter 9: Make — and fund — a plan for preventing pandemics (timestamp: 57:40)

Afterword: How COVID changed the course of our digital future (timestamp: 1:03:00)

Gates GERM Team

By now, you’ve probably heard that the World Health Organization is attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and response, and ultimately, all health care decisions. But did you know Bill Gates, the largest funder of the WHO (if you combine funding from his foundation and GAVI), also intends to play a key part in this takeover?

As Gates explains in a video at the beginning of Corbett’s report, he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team. This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and make decisions about when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness.3

Alas, as noted by “Rising” host Kim Iversen in the video compilation above, if COVID-19 has taught us anything, it’s that stopping the spread of a virus is more or less impossible, no matter how draconian the rules. Meanwhile, the side effects of lockdowns and business shutdowns are manifold.

People’s health has suffered from lack of health care. Depression and suicide have skyrocketed. Economies have gone bust. Violent crime has risen. Tucker also points out the false premise behind Gates’ pandemic prevention plan, stating:4

“This theory of virus control — the notion that muscling the population makes a prevalent virus shrink into submission and disappear — is a completely new invention, the mechanization of a primitive instinct.

Smallpox occupies a unique position among infectious diseases as the only one affecting humans that has been eradicated. There are reasons for that: a stable pathogen, a great vaccine, and a hundred years of focused public health work. This happened not due to lockdowns but from the careful and patient application of traditional public-health principles.

[T]he attempt to crush a respiratory virus through universal avoidance could be worse than allowing endemicity to it to develop throughout the population.”

Gates’ Destructive Greed

During COVID, we basically traded false protection against one thing for a multitude of other ills that are far worse in the long run. Now, Gates and the WHO want to make this disastrous strategy the norm.

Once again, we see Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate what the world must do to make him a ton of money, because he’s always heavily invested in the very “solutions” he presents to the world. While he’s built a reputation as a philanthropist, his actions are self-serving, and more often than not, the recipients of his “generosity” end up worse than they were before.

Case in point: After 15 years, Gates’ Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) project has now been proven an epic fail.5 Gates promised the project would “double yields and incomes for 30 million farming households by 2020.”

That false prognosis was deleted from the AGRA website in June 2020, after a Tuft University assessment revealed hunger had actually increased by 31%. February 28, 2022, the first-ever evaluation report6 confirmed the failure of AGRA.

The Globalists’ Double-Prong Attack on National Sovereignty

But getting back to the globalists’ plan to seize global control through biosecurity governance, they are attempting to do this using two different avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we’ll end up under totalitarian governance.

The first attack comes in the form of amendments7 to the International Health Regulations (IHR). The second attack comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO.

Starting with the first takeover strategy, as you read this, countries around the world are in the process of voting on amendments to the IHR.8 By May 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly will have concluded their vote on these amendments and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law in November 2022.

The IHR, adopted in 2005, is what empowers the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).9 This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts. While the IHR grants the WHO exceptional power over global health policy already, under the current rules, member states must consent to the WHO’s recommendations.

This is one key feature that is up for revision. Under the new amendments, the WHO would be able to declare a PHEIC in a member state over the objection of that state. The amendments also include ceding control to WHO regional directors authorized to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).

In summary, the IHR amendments establish “a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting and management,” Robert Malone, Ph.D., warns,10 and we the public have no say in the matter.

We have no official avenue for providing feedback to the World Health Assembly, even though the amendments will give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict our rights and freedoms in the name of biosecurity. There’s not even a publicly available list of who the delegates are or who will vote on the amendments.

Summary of Proposed IHR Amendments

A summary of the proposed changes to the IHR was recently provided by Malone.11 In all, the WHO wants to amend 13 different IHR articles (articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53 and 59), the end result of which is the following:12

1. “Increased surveillance — Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from COVID-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.

2. 48-hour deadline — Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.

3. Secret sources — Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.

4. Weakened sovereignty — Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern.

The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.”

Once the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, nations will have only a limited time — six months — to reject them. That would put us into November 2022. Any nation which hasn’t officially rejected the amendments will then be legally bound by them, and any attempt to reject them after the six-month grace period will be null and void.

Attack No. 2: The WHO Pandemic Treaty

The second attempt to gain global control is through an international pandemic treaty with the WHO. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in December 2021,13 for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty.

In summary, the WHO wants to make its pandemic leadership permanent. It can then extend its power into the health care systems of every nation, and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part of The Great Reset.

While a WHO-based universal health care system is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general is to push the world toward universal health coverage.14

And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”15 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,16,17 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion.

The problem with this treaty is that it simply cannot work. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.

The WHO intends to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.

Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.

The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.

Are You Ready to Cede All Authority to Gates-Led Group?

In closing, Gates’ GERM team would be the ones with the authority to declare pandemics and coordinate global response.18 Are you ready to cede all authority over your life, health and livelihood to the likes of Gates? I hope not.

In this video, Del Bigtree with “The Highwire” provides poignant examples where Gates is now admitting what “The Highwire,” I and many others have been saying since the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, and getting censored and deplatformed for it.

Gates is two years behind everyone else, yet despite his apparent inability to interpret the readily available data, he now wants power to dictate health rules to the whole world. We can’t let that happen.

Join the Global #StopTheWHO Campaign

It’s going to require a global response to prevent these two power grabs, starting with the IHR amendments under vote by the World Health Assembly. To that end, the World Council for Health has launched a global #StopTheWHO campaign. Here’s how you can get involved:19

Speak — Raise awareness on the ground and online. Use articles, posters, videos

Act — Campaign through rallies, political mobilization, legal notices and cases and similar campaigns

Collaborate with health freedom coalitions such as the World Council for Health

Explore activist toolboxes such as: http://www.dontyoudare.info and stopthewho.com

Engage global indigenous leadership to take a united stand against the WHO’s IHR

Notify World Health Assembly country delegates to oppose the IHR amendments

Activate people’s parliaments, legislatures or referendums to oppose power grabs

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Monkeypox Cases Coincide with BARDA Purchase of Vax Which Could Cause A Global Smallpox Epidemic

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/05/monkeypox-cases-in-u-s-coincide-with-vaccine-purchases-by-barda/

Monkeypox Cases in U.S Coincide With Vaccine Purchases by BARDA

by Rishma Parpia
Published May 24, 2022
Important Excerpts:
On May 18, 2022, biotechnology firm Bavarian Nordic of Denmark announced that the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), signed a contract with it to supply a freeze-dried version of its smallpox and monkeypox vaccine.4
A freeze-dried version of the vaccine is stated to have a longer shelf life.5BARDA placed an $119 million order for 13 million freeze-dried doses of Bavarian Nordic’s smallpox and monkeypox vaccine known as JYNNEOS®.  The contract states that the U.S. has an option to purchase additional vaccines worth $180 million if needed.6
SUMMARY:
  • On May 18, 2022, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) reported that a resident in the state has tested positive for monkeypox, the same day BARDA signed a contract to purchase 13 million doses of JYNNEOS.
  • In 2019 the FDA approved JYNNEOS, a live, non-replicating smallpox and monkeypox vaccine for high risk adults 18 years of age and older.  It is a two-dose regimen given four weeks apart and is the only FDA approved vaccine.
  • The FDA states it is made from a modified form of the vaccinia virus (Modified Vaccinia Ankara), which is closely related but less harmful than variola or monkeypox viruses and supposedly can not cause disease in humans.
  • The FDA states the recent purchase has nothing to do with the recent outbreak.

______________________

**UPDATE May, 2022**

I’m reminded of the following fact:Source

The CDC admits that people recently vaccinated with the existing FDA-approved smallpox vaccine can shed the virus in the vaccine to others.

Given the risk for vaccinia virus transmission from recently vaccinated persons through inadvertent inoculation, nonemergency use of ACAM2000 is also contraindicated in persons with household contacts with a history or presence of atopic dermatitis, other active exfoliative skin conditions (e.g., eczema, burns, impetigo, varicella zoster, herpes, severe acne, severe diaper dermatitis with extensive areas of denuded skin, psoriasis, or Darier disease [keratosis follicularis]); conditions associated with immunosuppression (e.g., HIV/AIDS, leukemia, lymphoma, generalized malignancy, solid organ transplantation, or therapy with alkylating agents, antimetabolites, radiation, TNF inhibitors, or high-dose corticosteroids [i.e., ≥2 mg/kg body weight or 20 mg/day of prednisone or its equivalent for ≥2 weeks], hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients <24 months post-transplant or ≥24 months, but who have graft-versus-host disease or disease relapse, or autoimmune disease [e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus] with immunodeficiency as a clinical component); household contacts aged <1 year; and household contacts who are pregnant (recommendation category: A, evidence type 2 [Box]). Household contacts include persons with prolonged intimate contact with the potential vaccinee (e.g. sexual contacts) and others who might have direct contact with the vaccination site or with potentially contaminated materials (e.g., dressings or clothing). ACIP also does not recommend nonemergency vaccination with ACAM2000 for children and adolescents aged <18 years.

And guess what one of those side effects is that shares a common side effect with the COVID-19 vaccines?

Myopericarditis has also been associated with ACAM2000 and is estimated to occur at a rate of 5.7 per 1,000 primary vaccinees based on clinical trial data. (Source.)

Yes, weakened hearts resulting in heart disease is also a side effect of the smallpox vaccines.
You can read about all the other Precautions and Contraindications for this FDA-approved smallpox vaccine here on the CDC website.

https://palexander.substack.com/p/smallpox-vaccine-to-prevent-monkey?

Smallpox vaccine to prevent monkeypox could cause global smallpox (vaccinia) epidemic; I warn, do not be that stupid, understand you have damaged the immune systems of m (b)illions with COVID vaccines

Experts are saying smallpox vax 85% effective in monkey pox; this is NOT good news, for millions/billions are now immunocompromised from COVID vax; CDC sounds alarm for gay-bisexual men
May 21, 2022

First, I would ask POTUS Biden to go back out to the nation and address his prior statement about monkeypox risk which was misinformed and served to scare the nation (‘Everybody Should Be Concerned’ About Monkeypox, Biden Warns’). There was no basis for Biden to say what he did and whomever cleared him to say that e.g. para ‘concerned about monkeypox’, should be fired. This has caused needless concern by the general population. The legacy media must be shut down for the utter reckless manner in which they report on this monkeypox and it is clear they are seeking to cause panic and hysteria when the general population, children, low-risk persons etc. are not at risk. Based on all we know today, the fear mongering MUST be stopped.

Now an i) update from CDC on the risk-group that monkeypox is focused in (as of Monday 23rd May 2022), ii) updated evidence of transmission by WHO expert, iii) some preliminary thoughts on the failed COVID mRNA vaccine, iv) the WHO pandemic treaty, and then v) further details on this issue of smallpox vaccination and monkeypox with a special shoutout to Dr. Vinay Prasad for his balance and common sense in this.  (See link for article)

___________________

**Comment**

Highlights on smallpox vaccination & monkeypox (I highly recommend reading the entire article):

  • By initiating smallpox vaccination, if it contains smallpox or viccinia virus, smallpox and vaccinia could be re-introduced to populations and would be catastrophic.
  • Monkeypox should be fought with tried and tested successful focused public health containment tools such as acute contact tracing and isolating infected/symptomatic people, not mass vaccination of the population.
  • Even vaccinating the identified at-risk group – bisexual and homosexuals, needs careful study for HIV/AIDS patients who have been COVID “vaccinated” now have 2 existing challenges beyond the risk of monkeypox as their immune systems are suppressed due to HIV as well as being compromised/dysregulated due to the COVID shots.  Lyme/MSIDS patients would also fit into this category.
  • The immune system is suppressed for 2 weeks post COVID shots leaving people vulnerable to COVID and other viral infections/pathogens as well as the fact white blood cells are depressed during this time and explains why there are so many adverse events, hospitalizations and deaths in the first 2-3 weeks post ‘vaccine’.  The fact the CDC/NIH do not count these as occurring in the ‘vaccinated’ is fraudulent & done to make a ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ narrative. 
  • Corrupt public health ‘officials’ did not warn the ‘vaccinated’ of their vulnerability post jab and that they may be at risk of developing a broad range of illnesses including cancers.  Please see Dr. Urso’s 5-minute video explaining about the explosion of cancer and latent disease (reactivated latent viruses, etc) post COVID shots.
  • It appears to be transmitted as a STD, although this has been debated.
  • As of today, there have been ZERO deaths due to monkeypox cases in Europe and North America.
  • Do not take any more COVID shots. COVID is continuing due to the continued “vaccination” with non-sterilizing, non-neutralizing shots with antibodies that are targeting the infectiousness of the virus (the spike).
  • “Increasing the number of vaccinated persons will inevitably lead to increases in morbidity and mortality due to vaccinia, and current evidence suggests net harm would result if smallpox vaccine were made available to the general public on a voluntary basis.”  SOURCE
  • Valid conjecture is COVID shots suppressing immune systems has caused monkeypox to emerge in Europe and N. America. COVID ‘vaccinated’ could be at dramatic risk to monkeypox and a host of other pathogens/viruses.
  • The smallpox vaccine can potentially drive cases of smallpox and vaccinia in COVID ‘vaccinated’.

“Smallpox vaccine is less safe than other vaccines routinely used today. The vaccine is associated with known adverse effects that range from mild to severe. Mild vaccine reactions include formation of satellite lesions, fever, muscle aches, regional lymphadenopathy, fatigue, headache, nausea, rashes, and soreness at the vaccination site.13,18,19 A recent clinical trial reported that more than one-third of vaccine recipients missed days of work or school because of these mild vaccine-related symptoms.18…

In the 1960s, serious adverse events associated with smallpox vaccination in the United States included death (1/million vaccinations), progressive vaccinia (1.5/million vaccinations), eczema vaccinatum (39/million vaccinations), postvaccinial encephalitis (12/million vaccinations), and generalized vaccinia (241/million vaccinations).20 Adverse events were approximately ten times more common among those vaccinated for the first time compared to revaccinees.20 Fatality rates were also four times higher for primary vaccinees compared to revaccinees.21…

Progressive vaccinia (a.k.a. vaccinia necrosum, vaccinia gangrenosum) is defined as an uncontrolled replication of vaccinia virus at the vaccination site that leads to a slow and progressive necrosis of surrounding tissue.24 Satellite necrotic lesions typically develop, and ultimately vaccinia virus may be found in other tissues and organs.24 This condition typically affects individuals with incompetent immune systems.24,25 The cardinal clinical signs of progressive vaccinia include an unhealed vaccination site >15 days post vaccination, and the lack of inflammation or an immune response at the vaccination site.24,25 Untreated progressive vaccinia is fatal, but treatment with VIG or the antiviral cidofovir may be effective in some cases.”  SOURCE

“There are more than 100 million doses of another vaccine, ACAM2000. This is an older generation vaccine meant to prevent smallpox, but could also be used to prevent monkeypox, McQuiston said. That vaccine, however, can come with significant side effects, and would be considered only for very close personal contacts of those with monkeypox infection, as well as health care workers.” SOURCE

Dr. Alexander is a COVID-19 Consultant Researcher in EBM, Research Methodology, and Clinical Epidemiology and informally provides support to some members of the US Congress and Senate.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Lyme Disease and Bell’s Palsy: New Considerations For Differential Diagnosis

https://www.globallymealliance.org/blog/lyme-disease-and-bells-palsy-new-considerations-for-differential-diagnosis

Lyme Disease and Bell’s Palsy: New Considerations for Differential Diagnosis

by Timothy Sellati, P.h.D. on March 28, 2022

<span id="hs_cos_wrapper_name" class="hs_cos_wrapper hs_cos_wrapper_meta_field hs_cos_wrapper_type_text" style="" data-hs-cos-general-type="meta_field" data-hs-cos-type="text" >Lyme Disease and Bell’s Palsy: New Considerations for Differential Diagnosis</span>
Neurological disorder resulting from COVID-19 may confound Lyme disease diagnosis.

Bell’s palsy is a non-progressive neurological disorder of one of the facial nerves (7th cranial nerve). Bell’s palsy is fundamentally a clinical diagnosis with no specific laboratory test to confirm the disorder.1 This disorder is characterized by the sudden onset of facial paralysis that may be preceded by a slight fever, pain behind the ear on the affected side, a stiff neck, and weakness and/or stiffness on one side of the face. Paralysis results from decreased blood supply and/or compression of the 7th cranial nerve. This compression can be caused by inflammation of the tissue around the nerve. Approximately 40,000 individuals are diagnosed with Bell’s palsy in the US each year, affecting males and females in equal numbers.

The exact cause of Bell’s palsy is not known, however, bacterial infections (like Lyme disease),1 and viral infections (like Herpes and Epstein-bar virus),2 immune disorders (like Guillain-Barre syndrome) and neuropathies (like brain tumors), are frequently implicated as a cause.

Neurological Lyme Disease and Bell’s Palsy

Bell’s palsy is the most common manifestation of Lyme neuroborreliosis (or neurological Lyme disease) in the US.1 Clues pointing toward Lyme neuroborreliosis include a history of rash compatible with a bull’s-eye erythema migrans (EM) rash or fever in the weks preceding the palsy. Treatment with antibiotic therapy is highly effective, and most patients will fully recover facial nerve function.1 According to Dr. Nate Jowett, M.D. (Massachusetts General Brigham) ~5% of patients with Lyme disease will develop some degree of sudden facial weakness, where one or both sides of the face droop. This tends to occur seven- to 21-days after tick exposure in infected patients.

COVID-19 and Bell’s Palsy

More recently, though a rare occurrence, Bell’s palsy has also been associated with COVID-193 and adverse drug reactions following mRNA-based vaccination for COVID-19.4-7 A recent systematic review found 20 COVID-19 patients whose only major neurological manifestation was Bell’s palsy. In a separate report, according to Colella et al.,an otherwise healthy 37-year-old white Caucasian male developed Bell’s palsy within days after COVID-19 vaccination. Of note, there was no history of trauma, cold or other identifiable triggers reported and no other signs or symptoms were present. Specifically, no history of a preceding infection, including recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, was reported and there was no evidence of a cutaneous rash suggestive of Herpes zoster infection.6 Lack of a cutaneous rash (e.g., EM) might also rule out Lyme disease, though it should be noted that EM may be missed or not develop in some Lyme disease cases.8

Bell’s palsy associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection was either the first neurological manifestation or appeared two to 28 days after the appearance of other clinical manifestations.3 When associated with COVID-19 vaccination Bell’s palsy developed between three and 30 days post second-dose vaccination.6 The FDA points out that cases of Bell’s palsy in vaccine groups did not represent a frequency above that expected in the general population and concluded that currently available information was insufficient to determine a causal relationship with the vaccine. Nevertheless, they also recommend surveillance for cases of Bell’s palsy with deployment of the vaccine into larger populations.6

Since the time frames for onset of Bell’s palsy associated with Lyme disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination overlaps, it is important for front-line physicians to be aware that when faced with differentially diagnosing a patient that presents with Bell’s palsy they should consider:

  1. The prevalence of ticks and Lyme disease in the geographic area in which the patient resides
  2. Case history of the individual that may increase the risk of coming into contact with ticks and contracting Lyme disease (time of year, outdoor activities, pets, ), finding a tick on themselves, and/or travel to a Lyme-endemic area to name a few
  3. Other symptoms consistent with Lyme disease (g., EM, arthritis, carditis, other neurological complications, etc.)
  4. Timing of the onset of Bell’s palsy and when they contracted COVID-19 or underwent vaccination for COVID-19

In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to causing a whole new set of public health challenges associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections, has also further confounded physicians’ efforts to distinguish Lyme neuroborreliosis from other disorders that cause neurological disease. It is recognition of these complexities that leads GLA to invest financial resources and support research that will ensure rapid and accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of Lyme neuroborreliosis.

REFERENCES

1          Marques, A., Okpali, G., Liepshutz, K. & Ortega-Villa, A. M. Characteristics and outcome of facial nerve palsy from Lyme neuroborreliosis in the United States. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 9, 41-49, doi:10.1002/acn3.51488 (2022).

2          Zhang, W. et al. The etiology of Bell’s palsy: a review. J Neurol 267, 1896-1905, doi:10.1007/s00415-019-09282-4 (2020).

3          Gupta, S., Jawanda, M. K., Taneja, N. & Taneja, T. A systematic review of Bell’s Palsy as the only major neurological manifestation in COVID-19 patients. J Clin Neurosci 90, 284-292, doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2021.06.016 (2021).

4          Cirillo, N. & Doan, R. The association between COVID-19 vaccination and Bell’s palsy. Lancet Infect Dis 22, 5-6, doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00467-9 (2022).

5          Cirillo, N. & Doan, R. Bell’s palsy and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines-an unfolding story. Lancet Infect Dis 21, 1210-1211, doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00273-5 (2021).

6          Colella, G., Orlandi, M. & Cirillo, N. Bell’s palsy following COVID-19 vaccination. J Neurol 268, 3589-3591, doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10462-4 (2021).

7          Cirillo, N. Reported orofacial adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines: The knowns and the unknowns. J Oral Pathol Med 50, 424-427, doi:10.1111/jop.13165 (2021).

8          Schutzer, S. E. et al. Atypical erythema migrans in patients with PCR-positive Lyme disease. Emerg Infect Dis19, 815-817, doi:10.3201/eid1905.120796 (2013).

__________________
For more:

Category:

Lyme, research, vaccines, Viruses