https://jbs.org/alert/get-us-out-of-the-un/ Go here to contact your Representatives & Senators
Get US Out! of the UN
Many see the United Nations as a global organization working toward the noble goals of world peace and global justice. Yet, the UN’s own actions demonstrate loud and clear the true purpose of the organization: to build a world government at the expense of the liberty and independence of its sovereign nation members.
URGENT: The American Sovereignty Restoration Act (H.R. 7806) has been reintroduced for the 117th Congress. This bill would fully withdraw the U.S. from the United Nations and its associated entities, thus restoring U.S. national independence. Contact your U.S. representative and senators and urge them to support this bill!
MEANWHILE: The World Health Organization is planning an unprecedented power grab to build a global biomedical surveillance state — this is yet another reason why the U.S. must fully withdraw from the United Nations, and why Congress must reintroduce and enact the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. Although the WHO’s power grab seriously threatens American sovereignty and liberty, the root of this threat lies in the U.S.’s membership in the UN itself. The UN’s very purpose is to establish a one-world government at the expense of its members’ sovereignty; withdrawal is imperative!
The United Nations is one of the greatest threats to U.S. national sovereignty and the God-given freedoms of Americans. It is imperative that Congress pass and the president enact the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (ASRA), which would fully withdraw the U.S. from the UN and all its associated entities.
Also, please read this important excerpt from this article:
When this document is signed (and it will be), there will be those who believe that the WHO has the right to make decisions for Americans without their consent. This is the creation of an illegitimate government that operates without the consent of the governed.
Forced lockdowns of your small town, medications being added to your municipal water supply, forcibly killing off of all your livestock due to “disease risk,” groups of men pinning your children down while they are at school in order to inject an mRNA substance into their bloodstream – these are all very real possibilities of this piece of paper being signed by those who have no right to control either you or your children.
The video within shows eviction notices being given to those in the Ronald McDonald House who are not ‘vaccinated’.
For more on the top link regarding the WHO power grab:
Declaration of Opposition to the Proposed International Health Regulations Amendments
We, the undersigned, oppose the proposed amendments to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) existing 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) and stand in support of all people’s right to health sovereignty and self-determination.
The United States’ proposed amendments to the IHR are set to be considered at the 75th World Health Assembly, which begins on the 22nd of May, 2022. The proposed amendments, however, create an ambiguity relating to the date they become effective as the proposed amendments expressly state they will become effective six months after the date of notification by the Director-General, whereas the existing IHR provides that amendments become effective 18 months after notification by the Director-General.
If accepted, these legally binding amendments would come into effect for all member states except those that explicitly reject them. Under Article 59 of the IHR, de facto approval is assumed for any member states that fail to reject or take reservation to the amendments.
The existing IHR, adopted in 2005, respect the sovereignty of all member nations. The proposed amendments, however, would expand and codify the WHO’s authority to implement global health mandates in direct violation of national sovereignty and citizens’ rights.
These proposals attempt to eliminate a nation’s autonomy, during times of real, assumed or anticipated public health emergencies, affording the WHO unilateral power in assessing and determining a health emergency and empowering the WHO to dictate policy and response.
All of this comes on the heels of the COVID-19 crisis during which the WHO grossly mismanaged all facets of the global health response by encouraging economy-destroying lockdowns, suppressing early preventive treatments and recommending interventions that have proven to be neither safe nor effective.
Under the guise of health regulations, these amendments would permit the WHO to seize executive governance powers over member states, granting governing powers to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.
Below are just a few of the many ambiguous and concerning provisions in the amendments proposed by the US Department of Health & Human Services on January 18, 2022.
Proposed new text is displayed in bold underline, and proposed deletions to existing text are shown as
strikethrough exactly as written in the proposal. All other text remains unchanged.
Article 5: Surveillance
NEW 5: WHO shall develop early warning criteria for assessing and progressively updating the national, regional, or global risk posed by an event of unknown causes or sources…
In practice this would accord the WHO unilateral authority to enact a universal health surveillance system devoid of public scrutiny or transparency, leaving open the possibility of manufactured sources of pandemics and other emergencies.
Article 9, Section 1
WHO may take into account reports from sources other than notifications or consultations and shall assess these reports according to established epidemiological principles and then communicate information on the event to the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring.
Before taking any action based on such reports, WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 10.
This excision from Article 9 eliminates consultations with the member state during an “alleged” health emergency while placing the WHO in a position to dictate how a State Party must proceed within its own territorial boundaries. This constitutes a threat to national sovereignty and self-determination.
Article 10, Section 4
If the State Party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO shall
may, when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other States Parties the information available to it, whilst encouraging the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration by WHO, taking into account the views of the State Party concerned.
Any nation rejecting the WHO’s declaration will have only 48 hours to reconsider its position and comply, or be subjected to pressures from other nations and/or penalties such as economic sanctions. The views of the affected nation will no longer be considered.
Article 12, Section 2
If the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these Regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring, the Director-General shall notify all States Parties and seek to consult with the State Party…. If the Director-General determines
and the State Party are in agreement regarding this determinationthat the event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, the Director-General shall, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49, seek the views of the Committee established under Article 48 (hereinafter the“Emergency Committee”) on appropriate temporary recommendations.
Article 12 creates a new subclass of health emergency empowering the WHO Director-General to unilaterally trigger pandemic protocols based on mere supposition of a “potential” threat. The stipulation that a nation must agree with the Director-General’s assessment is eliminated. Distant bureaucrats would be empowered to enact health policy not only for entire nations, but by extension for individuals – irrespective of the wishes of the nation or the people.
New Chapter IV (Article 53 bis-quater): The Compliance Committee
1. The State Parties shall establish a Compliance Committee that shall be responsible for:
(a) Considering information submitted to it by WHO and States Parties relating to compliance with obligations under these Regulations;
(b) Monitoring, advising on, and/or facilitating assistance on matters relating to compliance with a view to assisting States Parties to comply with obligations under these Regulations.
One of the IHR amendments’ most insidious changes is the creation of a “Compliance Committee” that will serve as the administrative and enforcement mechanism to ensure member states comply with WHO emergency directives involving infrastructure, capital expenditures, information gathering and implementation of emergency responses.
In sum, the IHR amendments would, among other changes:
- Intensify the surveillance of all countries and their citizens.
- Grant the WHO the authority to tell other member states when one member state isn’t reporting and launch punitive actions.
- Empower the WHO Director-General to declare when and where a pandemic or “alleged” emergency is occurring using undisclosed sources.
- Confer unrestricted powers to the Director-General to define and implement interventions.
- Give the WHO the ability to access and mobilize capital in the event of a pandemic.
This power grab by the WHO, its donors, and stakeholders represents a direct attack on the political and economic sovereignty of all nations and their citizens.
By repeatedly promoting policies that caused catastrophic economic, social, physical, emotional and mental damage across the globe, the WHO has failed in its mission as global steward of public health and cannot be entrusted with setting policy for all citizens of the world.
Of note, the WHO enjoys immunity from every form of legal action, arrest, and searches of their papers, documents, and facilities.
The WHO should not be allocated more money, power, or authority nor should it be allowed to further control the world’s health agenda or implement biosecurity measures.
Global agreements brokered by unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats must never be permitted to rule any nation.
It is imperative that each nation and territory retain its sovereignty, especially during times of crisis, so that the entire global community can be protected from globally directed policies that primarily benefit powerful financial and ideological stakeholders.
The undersigned respectfully request that all nations and their representatives repudiate such agreements.
We strongly oppose the proposed IHR amendments which would require nations and their citizens to adhere to the dictates of an unaccountable global body.
We oppose any involvement in a treaty, agreement, or other legally binding global document that would hinder any nation’s sovereignty in the area of public health.
We assert that nations and their citizens are best-positioned and -equipped to make health decisions appropriate to their communities.
We demand that the people of each nation be in charge of determining their response to health crises.
As citizens of the world, we defend the rights, freedoms, and privacy of all members of the global community by calling for the rejection of the IHR amendments and the WHO’s attempt to usurp the power and authority of health policy from its rightful place – at home amongst the people.
On May 18, 2022, this declaration was authored and signed by,
Health Freedom Defense Fund
Click here for more information from our partners.
- Children’s Health Defense
- National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC.org)
- Corona Investigative Committee
- Stand for Health Freedom
- Doctors for COVID Ethics
- Global Health Responsibility Agency
- World Council for Health
- Alliance for Natural Health USA
- US Freedom Flyers
- Truth for Health Foundation
- Unity Project
- Freedom Travel Alliance
- Transformative Health Justice
- African Sovereignty Coalition
- Idaho Freedom Foundation
- No College Mandates
- The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge
- The Solari Report
- Viruswaarheid, The Netherlands
- Federal Employees for Freedom
- The Truth About Cancer & The Truth About Vaccines
- Medical Forum
- Teachers For Choice
- Children’s Health Defense Africa
- Informed Choice WA
- TN Coalition for Vaccine Choice
- Liberty Counsel
- Liberty Counsel Action
- Advocates for Children
- Weston A. Price Foundation
- Faith and Liberty
- Chek Institute
- New Mexico Stands Up
- World Wide Demonstration
- UK Medical Freedom Alliance
- Children’s Health Defense Europe
- Children’s Health Defense Australia
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Chair Children’s Health Defense
- Mary Holland, President and General Counsel CHD
- Dr Reiner Fuellmich, Attorney, Germany
- Dr Peter McCullough, MD, MPH
- Dr Naomi Wolf, CEO Daily Clout, author, Other People’s Bodies
- Dr Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist, MIT
- Dr Mike Yeadon, former Pfizer CSO
- Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi
- Prof. Michael Palmer
- Dr Judy Mikovits
- Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D.
- Dr James Lyons-Weiler, IPAK
- Sally Fallon Morell
- Dr Joseph Mercola, Founder/Owner Mercola.com
- Michele Bachmann, former US Representative
- Catherine Austin Fitts, President, Solari Inc.
- Willem Engel, Founder Viruswaarheid
- Dr Tess Lawrie, World Council for Health
- Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, World Council for Health
- Mat Staver, Founder/Chair Liberty Counsel
- Leigh Dundas, Esq
- Dr Andrew Wakefield
- Dr Elizabeth Mumper, MD, FAAP, IFMCP
- Virginie de Araujo-Recchia, Attorney, France
- Dr Elizabeth Evans MA, MBBS, DRCOG, UK Medical Freedom Alliance
- Ana Garner, lead counsel New Mexico Stands Up
- Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt, attorney (Adv.) South Africa
- Paul Chek, Chek Institute
- Sarah Pope, The Healthy Home Economist
- Orsolya Győrffy
- Justyna Walker
- Philipp Kruse, Attorney, Switzerland
- Thomas Binder
- Taylor Hudak
- Josh Yoder, US Freedom Flyers
- Miste Karlfeldt, ED, Health Freedom Idaho
- Sarah Clendenon, ED, Health Freedom Idaho
- Charlene L. Bollinger
- Ty Bollinger
- Susan Sweetin