Archive for the ‘Testing’ Category

Lyme Testing, Blood work, and Diagnoses

https://www.globallymealliance.org/blog/lymewarrior

Every few months, Jennifer Crystal devotes a column to answering your questions. Do you have a question for Jennifer? If so, email her at lymewarriorjennifercrystal@gmail.com.
How were you finally diagnosed with Lyme disease?

People ask me this question all the time, especially when their own lab work comes back negative or equivocal, but they have symptoms of Lyme disease or remember a tick bite. Here’s an important fact that not everyone—including some doctors—knows: per the CDC, Lyme disease is a clinical diagnosis. That means that it is up to your doctor to determine, based on your symptoms and on factors such as whether you had a tick bite or whether you spent time in an area where Lyme is common, whether you have Lyme disease or not. That clinical diagnosis can be supported by lab tests, but tests alone cannot definitively say whether you do or don’t have Lyme disease.

That last part bears repeating: tests alone cannot definitively say whether you do or don’t have Lyme disease. This is because Lyme tests only look for antibodies against the bacteria that causes Lyme disease, not for the bacteria itself. Testing for Lyme disease is faulty for a number of reasons, including the fact that standard CDC tests only looks for a very narrow set of bands of antibodies—so narrow, in fact, that those tests were not actually designed for diagnostic purposes, even though they are used as such. You can use other labs that look for a wider range of bands (for more information, see GLA’s Lyme Disease Testing page), which can give your doctor a better read than standard tests. At the end of the day, though, the diagnosis is still up to your doctor.

I was clinically diagnosed by a Lyme Literate Medical Doctor (LLMD), and I was lucky enough to also have a CDC-positive lab test. I also tested positive for the co-infections babesiosis and ehrlichiosis, and my doctor suspects that I also had Bartonella. If you had a standard Lyme test come back negative but have reason to believe you do in fact have Lyme disease, see a LLMD. They will make a clinical assessment, likely do the more specialized tests, and probably do tests of certain biomarkers that may help them figure out if you have Lyme disease.

Can tests show that your Lyme disease is gone or in remission?

Unfortunately, no. If you’ve had Lyme disease, your long-term antibodies (IgG) will likely continue to show up whether your infection is active or not. Antibodies of acute Lyme infection (IgM) could mean your old infection is still active, or they could mean you have a new infection. As a result, most doctors do not use tests to determine whether your Lyme infection is cleared or dormant; they go by clinical symptoms. Other biomarker tests, like inflammatory markers and immune markers, can help them determine how active your infection is, but currently there is no direct test to determine where your Lyme infection stands.

Is it important to get other blood work done while you’re being treated for tick-borne illness?

Absolutely. Even though tests can’t reliably tell you whether you have Lyme disease or how active the infection is, it’s really important that your doctor does regular blood work ups to determine how your tick-borne infections, and your treatment for them, are impacting your body. You may get depleted of certain nutrients, your inflammatory markers could be high, or you might show anemia. I get a complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) every two months; when I was acutely ill and on intravenous antibiotics, I had my blood drawn every week. My doctor also does specific tests for markers that have been off for me in the past (for example, my ferritin levels were recently low, so I needed to take an iron supplement for a little while).

It’s also important to check for other health issues that may be going on in addition to tick-borne illness. When we’re in the midst of battle with these illnesses, it can be easy to forget the bigger picture, but you need to keep up with other regular health exams, too. A few years ago, I had a mammogram that showed a lump that required surgery. Thankfully, everything was benign, but if I’d skipped the mammogram to focus only on tick-borne illness, I might not have caught the lump in time. Make sure to keep up not just with regular blood work but also with annual health appointments, like the eye doctor and the dentist, as well.

The above material is provided for information purposes only. The material (a) is not nor should be considered, or used as a substitute for, medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, nor (b) does it necessarily represent endorsement by or an official position of Global Lyme Alliance, Inc. or any of its directors, officers, advisors or volunteers. Advice on the testing, treatment or care of an individual patient should be obtained through consultation with a physician who has examined that patient or is familiar with that patient’s medical history. 
Writer

Jennifer Crystal

Opinions expressed by contributors are their own. Jennifer Crystal is a writer and educator in Boston. Her work has appeared in local and national publications including Harvard Health Publishing and The Boston Globe. As a GLA columnist for over six years, her work on GLA.org has received mention in publications such as The New Yorker, weatherchannel.com, CQ Researcher, and ProHealth.com. Jennifer is a patient advocate who has dealt with chronic illness, including Lyme and other tick-borne infections. Her memoir about her medical journey is forthcoming. Contact her via email below.

Email: lymewarriorjennifercrystal@gmail.com

__________________

For more:

The Bear Metaphor & Your DNA

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/facing-the-beast

Facing the Beast

Can We Really Confront the Biggest Crime in Human History?

Excerpts:

I was relaxing in our screened porch in our little cottage in the forest, feeling rather pleased with myself. It had been an arduous week of the usual combat for liberty, but there had been victories.

Then I heard a “thump” about eight feet away behind my head.

I glanced behind me and saw the enormous ears and forehead of a sizable brown bear, who was ducking insolently, clearly aware of me, to lower himself behind the trash cans.

My heart pounded as I realized that he was not leaving; he continued pacing and circling, no matter where I went.

He was here because — I had done nothing to stop him. He was here because I let him slowly take over our home.

This all, of course, really happened. But that does not mean it is not also a metaphor.

The same week that this happened, I also finalized my reporting about the Pfizer vaccines, showing — what I knew for months I would eventually find.

The heart of the manufacture and distribution of millions of doses of the MRNA vaccines that are causing such a swath of death and destruction throughout North America and Western Europe, is enmeshed with the plans, methods and manufacturing infrastructure of our existential adversary.

The enemy is within our very bodies.

(See link for article)

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • Wolf believes this isn’t just about a greedy pharmaceutical company and a corrupt regulatory agency but a massive act of war.
    • Doubling of neonatal deaths, 34% above normal stillbirths and spontaneous abortions for “vaxxed” moms
    • 40% increase in death rates, shocking rise in disability
  • 2021 Hong Kong study (answerable to the CCP) showed when mice got the second dose of the booster, it resulted in visibly enlarged hearts with white patches, cytokine storms and liver damage seen by the naked eye.  The study concluded: “Post-vaccination myopericarditis is reported after immunization with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines.” 

  • Pfizer/BioNTech is a German-Chinese company and has an MOU with Fosun Pharmaceuticals, a major CCP-linked pharmaceutical company based in Shanghai, to make the Pfizer/BioNTech MRNA “vaccines”.  A SEC filing shows that the MOU with Fosun includes an equity investment by Fosun in BioNTech. In other words, the CCP is an equity investor in BioNTechFosun is not separate from the CCP; it is the CCP.
  • Fosun Pharma did not stay in China.  It came here. Fosun Pharmaceuticals is now also Fosun Pharmaceuticals USA, with branches for R and D and product formulation in Boston, MA and Princeton, NJ.
    • Fosun produces products in the US for distribution here and around the world and has has built a “global operation strategy” for the manufacture of COVID-19 vaccines, COVID-19 PCR tests and COVID-19 antigen tests. (These tests were the primary metric that determined the ‘pandemic’ and thus the lock downs. So a CCP-run company, and a CCP product decides who can go to work, school, and travel.)
    • A lawsuit has been filed in NY surrounding COVID testing because commercial labs get DNA, which then goes to Fulgent Genetics, which states they’re going to destroy all the samples and that they aren’t selling them to 3rd parties.
      • But a House Intel Committee Member warns that DNA test kits could lead to targeted bioweapons.
      • The LA County Sheriff’s Department announced they will not work with a China-linked genetics firm hired by the county to conduct COVID testing and registration because the FBI shared “very concerning information” about Fulgent Genetics Corporation – which was awarded a no-bid contract for the work.  LASD states DNA data from COVID testing is not guaranteed to be safe and secure from foreign governments and “will likely be shared with the Republic of China.”
        • China just happens to be quietly building the worlds largest DNA database.  All those COVID tests results will come in handy.
        • The FBI is shocked to find that China’s offer to build $100 Million ‘garden’ in DC just might be for espionage purposes.
        • There is growing concern over Chinese interests purchasing large swaths of land, particularly farmland, in the U.S. – including one sensitive parcel in North Dakota in the proximity of a military installation.
        • While Americans are paying $5 per gallon of gas, DOE docs show the Biden admin has sold nearly 6 million barrels of oil from the U.S. strategic reserve to an entity tied the CCP (Sinopec, parent org of Unipec through BHR Partners), which in turn has ties to Hunter Biden. The Biden admin. has also shipped more natural gas to Europe than promised.
    • Fosun obtained the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP)’s license to produce and supply the generic versions of:
      • Merck’s oral COVID-19 treatment Molnupiravir 
      • Pfizer’s oral COVID-19 treatment Nirmatrelvir
      • Pfizer’s Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir
    • Fosun, a CCP-owned hybrid entity is making millions off of Pfizer injections, Monupiravir, and Paxlovid, so when Biden does a deal with Pfizer with our tax dollars, and gets billions in omnibus bills for PPE, including millions for PCR and antigen tests, he is writing checks to China.
    • A 2018 whistleblower broke a scandal revealing that Fosun Pharmaceuticals had “massively” faked its data and bribed regulators. The FDA wrote them a stern letter.

Important quote:

So take all of the above, and map it against the 150,000 plus adverse events in the Pfizer documents, the deadly harms to reproduction, the Western baby die-off, the babies in seizures; map it against the population drop, the rise in disabilities, map it against the rigid, cruel vaccine mandates aimed at Western defense forces (Canada’s, and Australia’s and all of Western Europe’s, as well as at the most powerful military in the world, that of the United States) — map it against the vaccine mandates aimed at our police, our health care workers, our firefighters, our pilots, our first responders, our kids, our babies — all this done by a White House captive, via Hunter Biden’s laptop, to the CCP.

This all means, of course, that we are staring into the abyss right now.

Traumatized or not, we all need to snap out of denial.

We let our adversary come too close to us. Into our very bloodstreams.

We need to save each other.

We need to turn and face the ravening beast.

COVID Risks May Be Heightened by History of Lyme Disease

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220717/COVID-19-risks-may-be-heightened-by-history-of-Lyme-disease

COVID-19 risks may be heightened by history of Lyme disease

In a recent study published on the preprint server Research Square*, researchers report that individuals with a history of Borrelia infection, otherwise known as Lyme disease, caused by tick bites are at a higher risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Study: Correlation between COVID-19 severity and previous exposure of patients to Borrelia spp. Image Credit: Kateryna Kon / Shutterstock.com

(See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • Serological testing is not sufficient to differentiate between recent and past infections because antibodies persist in the blood – even after treatment.  What the article doesn’t say is that THIS, RIGHT HERE, is why current CDC 2-tiered testing should never be used solely to diagnose patients and why doctors need to be educated to make correct clinical judgments. 
  • What started the whole ball of wax is a case report of a patient infected with Lyme who was unsuccessfully treated with one round of antibiotics and who then got COVID.  The patient’s Lyme was suppressed (lower IgG test) due to the anti-COVID meds (umifenovir, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and ceftriaxone).
  • The study included:
    • 31 severely ill & hospitalized patients who were either required non-invasive or invasive ventilation.
    • 28 COVID positive patients who had either mild or asymptomatic cases who were either treated at home or unaware of infection.
    • 28 seronegative controls
  • Serum samples were collected for COVID and Borrelia infections
    • A multi-antigen microblot-array utilizing 19 antigens revealed Lyme in all hospitalized COVID patients. 
    • Of the 28 mild or asymptomatic patients, 19 had Lyme, whereas in the control group of 28, 8 had Lyme.
    • Severe COVID patients also had significantly higher levels of antibodies targeting Anaplasma.
  • Regarding seropositivity for IgM antibodies (1st antibodies to show up after infection that stay for a short period of time):
    • 24 of the 31 hospitalized patients had Lyme antibodies
    • 13 of the 28 mild/asymptomatic patients had Lyme antibodies
    • 15 of the 28 in the control group had Lyme antibodies
  • Risk of COVID-related hospitalizations increased with each positive IgG (antibodies produced later on in infection and can remain after infection resolves. Having high IgG can be indicative of chronic Lyme), but was not observed for IgM.
  • Post-hoc analysis of selected antigens (Osp proteins, p41, and VlsE) was also
    included; multivariate analysis showed that odds of hospitalization increased with increasing levels of:
    • IgG antibodies targeting OspB, OspC B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, and OspC
      B. spielmanii
    • For IgM antibodies, the same association was observed for antibodies targeting OspC B. spielmanii and OspE
  • Interestingly, the authors state that they observed in many patients antibodies targeting different species (e.g. B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, and at the same time
    B. afzelii, and/or B. garinii) which may reflect cross-reactivity but also may result from coinfections with more than one species.
  • Previous exposure to Lyme and other tick-borne diseases can increase risk of severe COVID and this is the first observation that suggests links between Lyme disease and COVID-19 prognostics.
  • The authors state that screening of anti-Borrelia antibodies in COVID patients could identify high-risk patients and improve their management.
Journal reference:
  • Szewczyk-Dabrowska, A., Budziar, W., Harhala, M., et al. (2022). Correlation between COVID-19 severity and previous exposure of patients to Borrelia spp. Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1799732/v1.

_________________

**Comment**

This is a very interesting study but I come up with slightly different take-aways.  The first of which is – don’t let this article frighten you.  1) there are cheap, effective, safe treatments for COVID.  Far safer & cheaper than Lyme/MSIDS treatment! 2) it only makes logical sense that those with Lyme/MSIDS are sitting ducks for pretty much everything including highly contagious viruses (if that’s what this even is). Lyme/MSIDS patients already struggle with EBV, Herpes, cytomegalovirus, and much, much more.  You are not a hopeless, helpless victim. There are answers and actions you can take to protect yourself and treat yourself should you contract COVID.:

  • The case study states that the person’s Lyme was suppressed due to anti-COVID meds, yet list antibiotics (ceftriaxone & azithromycin) that are used often for Lyme – which would explain the suppression.  Suppression doesn’t mean the Lyme goes away, it just means it isn’t being picked up on the test – a common, well-known problem patients deal with on a daily basis.
  • HCQ was used, which is also used for Babesia, a coinfection they didn’t look for but is known to cause much more severe Lyme for a greater duration IF the patient has both infection concurrently.
  • And Umifenovir is a broad‐spectrum antiviral, which while it doesn’t treat Lyme directly, could assist by beating back other viruses like herpes, EBV, and others – all of which are big players in Lyme.  Treating Lyme/MSIDS is a balancing act.  Giving appropriate treatment to beat back infections and supporting your immune system to handle what’s there without freaking out is more in line than a “cure” of erradicating everything within you.  We are covered in germs/viruses and most are held in check by our immune system.  A tick/insect bite changes that balance (or other modes of transmission such as congenital or sexual, etc)
  • They looked for 19 antigens which is unheard of for average folk!
  • They found Lyme (antibodies) in nearly everyone – even the controls!  This, to me, is the real finding. 
  • Their suggestion to “screen for anti-Borrelia antibodies in COVID patients” to identify potential “high risk” patients only has one flaw:  testing sucks and is not to be trusted!

FDA Still Working to Stifle Lab Testing Options

https://anh-usa.org/fda-working-to-stifle-lab-testing-options/

FDA Working to Stifle Lab Testing Options

FDA Working to Stifle Lab Testing Options

Another dangerous policy has been slipped into legislation that must pass Congress by the end of September. Action Alert!

For months now, we’ve been telling you about the dangers of mandatory product registration for supplements; one key threat is that this policy has been snuck into the reauthorization of drug user fees which must be approved by the end of September. Another bad policy has been tacked on to this must-pass legislation. It represents another attempt by the FDA to extend its power over laboratory developed tests (LDTs). This is a critical threat, as LDTs are crucial tools used in personalized medicine because labs can create custom diagnostic tests for all sorts of diseases. We cannot allow the FDA to stifle innovation in this sector and regulate these tests out of existence.

LDTs are diagnostic tests developed and performed by local labs. They are widely used—thousands of different LDTs are available—and include genetic tests, tests for rare conditions, companion diagnostics, and also diseases like COVID-19.

The LDT policy that has been snuck into PDUFA is the VALID Act. It creates a risk-based framework for the FDA to regulate LDTs in which “high-risk” LDTs would undergo premarket review, whereas LDTs determined to be “low-risk” would have less scrutiny and could qualify for exemptions to premarket review. High-risk tests are those for which an inaccurate result has a high likelihood of resulting in serious harm or death to patients or is likely to delay life-supporting treatment. The policy allows FDA to revoke pre-market exemptions if new information comes to light indicating greater risks to patients. Generally, LDTs currently being offered are grandfathered in and would not need to undergo premarket review, though they would need to adhere to the bill’s other requirements.

Premarket review for these tests is a big mistake. We saw this in stark relief during the COVID-19 pandemic. At the beginning of the pandemic, labs were held up from developing their own COVID tests because they needed to get emergency use authorization—in essence, pre-approval—to deploy their tests. This was a major missed opportunity; accurate testing is important, but the FDA prioritized red tape over getting people reasonably accurate means of testing for COVID that could have helped reduce transmission rates and hospitalizations at an earlier date.

Premarket review for LDTs will also stifle innovation in an exciting medical sector. Regulators are often suspicious of new products. The agency is also more influenced by older firms offering old technology. Protecting them can also lead to lucrative jobs after leaving government. This is the old crony capitalist conundrum.

The policy comes with a litany of other requirements for LDTs. For example, the FDA can require labeling, advertising, post market surveillance, and other things it deems necessary to detect and mitigate adverse events. Like Sen. Durbin’s mandatory product listing for supplements, the policy also requires all LDTs to register with the FDA—a requirement that will pose a significant time and personnel burden on laboratories that are already stretched thin and short-staffed.

The policy also calls for the development of a user fee program whereby testing companies pay the FDA to review their tests. This is another bad idea, as it privileges large, commercial test developers over smaller labs (non-profit labs, academic labs, etc.).

The FDA has tried before to put LDTs under its thumb. It claims to have some statutory authority over LDTs, but for decades chose not to regulate them as other diagnostic devices. LDTs have historically been regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). But in 2014, the FDA issued a draft guidance saying it would regulate LDTs as medical devices. Congress pushed back, with some legislators arguing that the FDA’s approach to LDTs was “redundant, [would] raise costs and stifle innovation, and [would] require additional taxpayer funding to the FDA.”

To us, it seemed clear that the FDA wants to take over LDTs in order to maintain the monopoly enjoyed by hospitals together with two companies: LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics. Given new authorities over LDTs, the agency would likely approve only those tests that big companies have a legal right to perform and are inclined to offer, and which insurance companies and Medicare will pay for.

LDTs are the future of medicine. People are already able to test for and spot cancers long before they manifest themselves using current methods. These tests are improving at a rapid rate. Testing can already help prevent diabetes, heart and blood vessel illness, prostate cancer, and other diseases. LDTs are not only the future of general medicine—they are also the future of individualized medicine, which is an exciting and important development. Integrative doctors use these tests to gather information that aids them in identifying the root causes of their patients’ illnesses—this information could not be gathered and analyzed otherwise.

We cannot let the FDA regulate these tests out of existence.

Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to oppose the VALID Act’s inclusion in the FDA user fee reauthorization bill. Please send your message immediately.

Go to top link to fill out a form to send to your representatives.

__________________

**Comment**

Hopefully the past few years have clearly demonstrated the problem with centralized, monopolized, government sanctioned testing under the auspice of “public health” that can and will be used to take away your freedoms and rights. This faulty testing has kept people from working, going to school, and partaking in society in general.

Lyme-land has similarly been in a testing juggernaut for 40 years – clearly showing the outcome of CDC/FDA propaganda and the underlying conflicts of interest that drives everything about public health.  Similarly to COVID, Lyme testing was created (and is still being used) that eliminated the most specific band for Lymedue to vaccine development.  A case definition (also still being used) was created to fit this faulty, unscientific paradigm that has ruled like an Iron Curtain ever since.  Truthcures has met with the FDA in an attempt to ameliorate this but 40 years is a long time to suffer with no change.

And speaking of testing corruption: A NYC company, owned by family who donated $300K to NY governor Hochul, paid $637 MILLION to manufacture at home COVID tests without considering bids from competing manufacturers and without a contract.

The FDA has been coming after CLIA-certified labs such as IgeneX since it opened its doors.  The CDC also has maligned these smaller specialized labs from the top down.  Their website used to have a paragraph that called them “home-brewed” tests.  I actually heard a pediatrician speak at the Wisconsin state capital who used this exact phrase.  Doctors have been brain-washed that these CLIA-certified labs, which undergo far more rigorous lab requirements than Lab Corp or Quest, are quackery.  The pediatrician’s statement is indicative of this propaganda process.

Ask yourself one question: why won’t doctors in mainstream medicine utilize Galaxy or IgeneX testing? 

The answer is clear: they’ve been told not to.  Who is telling them?  The CDC/FDA and other government agencies are monopolizing medicine through the CARES Act, which in turn controls doctors like puppets.  This is why people are not being treated with ivermectin, HCQ/zinc, IV vitamin C, and other known, effective treatments and why people are resorting to the court system to save their loved ones in the nick of time.

This exact scenario plays out in Lyme-land on a daily basis.

Lyme/MSIDS, similarly to COVID, has become so politicized that doctors are afraid to treat patients. Instead, they fearfully toe the CDC/FDA line by using their sanctioned tests, treatments, and guidelines – all of which are completely and utterly worthless.

Our only hope are brave, independent doctors who have chosen to step outside the corrupt, fraudulent medical monopoly to do what they started out to do: uphold the Hippocratic oath by treating patients as they see fit according to their medical training and experience, and defying the corrupt professional organizations that are in bed with the government. These doctors are being harassed, censored, and threatened at every turn but refuse to be silenced. 

Dr. Steven Harris – IgeneX Testing Explained

http://  Approx. 34 Min

Dr. Steve Harris – IgeneX Testing Explained

For more: