Archive for the ‘Lyme’ Category

As My Daughter Got Sicker and Sicker, Our Quest For Answers Dragged On. How Did We All Miss Lyme Disease?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/28/as-my-daughter-got-sicker-and-sicker-our-quest-for-answers-dragged-on-how-did-we-all-miss-the-bacteria-taking-over-her-body

As my daughter got sicker and sicker, our quest for answers dragged on. How did we all miss the bacteria taking over her body?

I write about nature, but when Milly got sick with a mystery illness, it never occurred to me that a long-forgotten tick bite could be the cause

There are many reasons to feel guilty. I’m a nature writer who preaches about the importance of wild childhoods, and my daughter has been made chronically ill by one trip to the countryside. I’m a journalist whose job it is to interrogate information and yet I didn’t demand better answers for her from NHS doctors. But the guilt is most painful when I remember a freezing wet day in October 2021.

Milly’s U10s football club were playing the league’s top team. Milly, player of the year the previous season, a whirl of blond energy across the pitch, had lost her enthusiasm for the beautiful game. That morning, she really didn’t want to play: she was tearful and exhausted. There was nothing obviously wrong: no cough, sickness, temperature. Her twin, Esme, was playing but without Milly the team were a player short. I told Milly they needed her. Stoic, she staggered off but couldn’t step on to the pitch. Instead, she curled into a ball of misery and fatigue beside her coach. The rain fell. Her team lost 15-1.

I cringe when I flick through the notebook where I recorded my daughters’ football matches (I was tragically keen). Below most results from the 21/22 season, I’ve written “Milly ill” or, worse, “Milly played ¼” or “Milly played ½”. All the time, cajoled or compelled to lead her “normal” life, Milly was getting sicker and sicker. We had no idea what was wrong. Every morning she looked terrible, dark circles beneath her eyes. She complained of perpetual tiredness, talked of being “disconcentrated” – she later learned to call this “brain fog” – and mentioned strange stabbing pains, mostly in her feet when she walked. Soon, she was too ill to go to school. Lockdown was over but it had become a permanent state for Milly, my wife, Lisa, and me.

What we didn’t know then, and wouldn’t discover until this spring, was that Milly’s body was being invaded by an insidious bacterium, Borrelia burgdorferi, which hides in connective tissue, confounding immune systems, wreaking havoc. Milly had Lyme disease, which takes its name from Old Lyme, a coastal town in Connecticut. This bacterial infection is not contagious but is transmitted by a tick, a tiny, blood-sucking arachnid that hops on to human skin in the countryside, where it is transported by other mammals, particularly deer. There are 476,000, and rising, annual cases in North America alone. Global heating is making ticks, their bacteria – and human illnesses – much more prevalent. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Another beautiful life side-lined by a bacteria we still know very little about that is infecting people by the millions and chronically affecting the lives untold numbers.

If I had a quarter for every misdiagnosis that was Lyme/MSIDS, I’d be a millionaire.

Will things ever change?

For more:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Treatment

CABI: Promoting a False Lyme Disease Narrative

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33928315?

Is CABI promoting a false public health narrative?

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Sep 28, 2025

Over the next week I will be posting correspondence with the management team at the Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI) regarding a controversial publication offered through CABI’s Digital Library:

Lyme Disease An Evidence-based Approach 3rd Edition
https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/book/10.1079/9781800626225.0000
John Halperin

It is a compilation of misinformation from those who have controlled the Lyme disease narrative for the past three decades. Through CABI, the false narrative is now being propagated worldwide.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: a.robinson@cabi.org, microbialservices@cabi.org
Cc: a.lainsbury@cabi.org, a.thompson@cabi.org, c.ashby@cabi.org, d.bird@cabi.org, h.fielder@cabi.org, j.cullum@cabi.org, j.porciello@cabi.org, r.schoelzel@cabi.org, w.cooper@cabi.org, h.jansen@cabi.org, k.shirley@cabi.org, support@cabi.org
Date: 08/25/2025 8:58 AM EDT
Subject: Is CABI promoting a false public health narrative?

CABI Digital Library

“CABI provides trusted, evidence-based content for researchers and professionals.”

Lyme DiseaseAn Evidence-based Approach 3rd Edition John Halperin

Chapter 16 Chronic Lyme Disease
https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/9781800626225.0016
Author: Adriana R. Marques

“The underlying mechanisms driving persistent symptoms after treatment of Lyme disease remain mostly unknown.”  

Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI)
Andy RobinsonManaging Director, Publishing

Dear Dr. Robinson,

The two NIH funded studies that set the stage for treatment denial (worldwide) had serious flaws in the methodology used to identify the causative agent of Lyme disease. This flawed science has caused unimaginable pain and suffering around the globe. What has been wrongfully established here in the United States has been propagated worldwide and promoted through CABI Digital Library.

Please take a moment to read the following email addressed to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Director of the National Institutes of Health identifying the problem that fueled the controversy over Lyme disease. A copy of this email has been sent to CABI’s Bioscience Services for review.

CABI is a leading provider of microbial and molecular services
https://www.cabi.org/products-and-services/bioscience-services/
“Our standard molecular identification service uses Sanger sequencing.” 

Question: Is CABI promoting a false public health narrative through the promotion of Halperin’s Lyme Disease, An Evidence-based Approach? 
 
A response to this inquiry is requested.

Respectfully submitted,
Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH USA

Email to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: jayanta.bhattacharya@nih.hhs.gov
Cc: adh1@stanford.edu
Date: 08/20/2025 9:14 AM EDT
Subject: Improving Science & Restoring Trust in Public Health | Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

Improving Science & Restoring Trust in Public Health | Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y_PxTxLFVg

“We discuss which scientific questions ought to be the priority for NIH, how to incentivize bold, innovative science especially from younger labs, how to solve the replication crisis and restore trust and transparency in science and public health, including acknowledging prior failures by the NIH.” 

To: Jay BhattacharyaDirector of the National Institutes of Health

Dear Dr. Bhattacharya,

Twenty-four years ago, Dr. Mark Klempner’s NIH funded research set the stage for long-term treatment denial when his methodology could not isolate the causative agent responsible for Lyme disease. Although a growing body of peer-reviewed evidence refuted his findings, the Centers for Disease Control refused to acknowledge anything outside of Klempner’s results and turned the disease into a syndrome when patients remained sick after the one size fits all IDSA mandated treatment protocol of 2-4 weeks.

Recent evaluation of Klempner’s methodology has uncovered fatal flaws in his PCR testing for Lyme disease; grants N01-AI-65308 and M01 RR000054.

Two Controlled Trials of Antibiotic Treatment in Patients with Persistent Symptoms and a History of Lyme Disease
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200107123450202#article_references#t=references

Please take a moment if you will to read the following emails sent to Klempner identifying the flaws in his research as described by Dr Sin Lee of Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, specializing in DNA sequencing-based diagnostics.

Dr. Mark Klempner’s NIH funded research is responsible for unimaginable pain and suffering across America requiring immediate attention by the Director of the National Institutes of Health.

Respectfully submitted,
Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH

Cc: Andrew Huberman, Ph.D. Stanford School of Medicine, Department of Neurobiology

Emails to Dr Mark Klempner: (There has been no response)

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: mark.klempner@umassmed.edu
Cc: michael.collins@umassmed.edu, ddutko@hanszenlaporte.com, ryan.kantor@usdoj.gov, michelle.seltzer@usdoj.gov, william.rinner@usdoj.gov, makan.delrahim@usdoj.gov, john.elias@usdoj.gov, NIHResearchIntegrity@mail.nih.gov, support@grants.gov, reviewpolicyofficer@od.nih.gov, AskORI@hhs.gov
Date: 08/17/2025 1:43 PM EDT
Subject: Did Dr Mark Klempner purify samples before PCR in his NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme disease grants (N01-AI-65308 and M01 RR000054)

On 04/27/2018 7:53 AM EDT Carl Tuttle <runagain@comcast.net> wrote: “Not a single positive Dr. Klempner? Doesn’t this statistically prove that your methodology was fatally flawed?” 

Dr. Klempner,

As a follow-up to my 2018 inquiry (which you did not respond) I would like to share a recent communication I had with Dr Sin Lee of Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, specializing in DNA sequencing-based diagnostics. Following his lead, I asked AI a question about your methodology for detecting Borrelia burgdorferi in your NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme disease.

Dr. Lee’s question to AI: 

Regarding Sanger Sequencing of Borrelia burgdorferi….

IMR Press   2025 Jun 19

Sanger Sequencing of Borrelia burgdorferi flaB Paralogs Detected Spirochetemia at the Early Localized Stage of Lyme Disease
Sin Hang Lee
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40613208/

-Dr Lee: “Accurate diagnosis of Lyme bacterial infection is the crux of the problem, which cannot be mitigated by mathematics. I asked AI to review my recent publication. Here is what AI says (I never purify any samples before PCR):” 

AI Overview

Yes, you’ve identified a significant risk associated with purifying a single target DNA molecule from a pool of non-target DNA for PCR amplification: 

potential loss of the very target DNA during the purification process.

Here’s why and some considerations:

Why purification can lead to target DNA loss

Multi-step process: DNA purification often involves multiple steps like cell lysis, binding to a matrix, washing, and elution. Each step presents an opportunity for loss, especially with extremely low quantities of starting material.

Low input DNA: When aiming to amplify a single DNA molecule, the initial amount of target DNA is minuscule. Even small inefficiencies at each stage can result in the complete loss of the target DNA before PCR can even begin.

Adsorption and binding inefficiencies: DNA might not bind efficiently to the purification matrix or might be lost during washing steps, especially if there are other cellular components or inhibitors present that interfere with binding.
Mechanical shearing: Some methods involve physical disruption or manipulation, which can damage the delicate DNA molecule and render it unusable for PCR.

Incomplete elution: The elution step, where the purified DNA is released from the matrix, might not be 100% efficient, leaving some target DNA behind.

Strategies to mitigate the risk
 

  • Optimize purification protocols: Careful optimization of buffers, incubation times, washing steps, and elution volumes is crucial to maximize recovery.
  • Use carrier RNA: Adding carrier RNA can improve the efficiency of DNA binding and recovery, particularly with low DNA concentrations.
  • Successive elutions: Performing multiple elution steps can help release more of the bound DNA from the purification matrix.
  • Avoid harsh methods: Consider less harsh purification techniques when working with minute quantities of DNA to minimize shearing and degradation.
  • Specialized kits: Commercial kits specifically designed for low input DNA or single molecule analysis may offer improved recovery rates compared to general DNA purification kits.
  • Direct amplification (where possible): In some cases, if the sample matrix is not highly inhibitory, direct amplification without extensive purification might be considered, although this increases the risk of PCR inhibition and false results.
  • Balancing purification and PCR inhibition

It’s a delicate balance. While purification aims to remove inhibitors that can hinder PCR, overly aggressive or inefficient purification can lead to the loss of the target itself. The choice of purification method and the level of rigor applied depend heavily on the sample type, the expected amount of target DNA, and the downstream PCR application.

Carl Tuttle’s question to AI: 

Did Dr Mark Klempner purify samples before PCR in his NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme disease? 

AI Overview 
In a study co-authored by Dr. Mark Klempner, researchers purified PCR products using a commercial kit for sequencing and analysis

Specifically:

-PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

-The purified samples were then eluted twice, and the eluates were pooled and sequenced.

Dr. Klempner,

Here are your PCR results from those NIH funded treatment trials: (ZERO POSITIVES!!) 

[View chart here:]https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/wlt03jb03gdu5whj89tfe/Klempner-PCR-Results.jpg?rlkey=jtobbpx9x5szyf0p5ttra0igf&dl=0

-Dr. Lee: To increase the chances of detecting single copy of Borrelia burfdorferi chromosome (or Osp A gene in a linear plasmid as Klempner et al did) in a specimen, pre-PCR purification risks losing the target DNA. Here is why according to AI (as Klempner et al did) 

AI Overview

When working with low quantities of DNA, especially when purifying a few molecules, silica-membrane-based DNA purification kits can indeed lead to DNA loss

Reasons for DNA loss

  • Inefficient binding: While DNA binds to silica in the presence of chaotropic salts, at very low concentrations, not all DNA molecules may efficiently bind to the silica membrane.
  • Inefficient elution: Eluting DNA from silica can also be inefficient, especially for larger DNA fragments or supercoiled DNA, which bind more tightly to the column’s matrix.
  • Low elution volume: Using a low elution buffer volume can also reduce the final DNA yield.

-Dr Lee: “The biggest flaw in Klempner et al.’s NEJM 2001 publication is the following statement:” 

Base-line specimens of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma specimens obtained at base line and on days 3, 5, 21, and 45 were tested by PCR for the presence of B. burgdorferi DNA, as previously described. [21]

-Dr Lee: In the Results section, they claimed that they found no BB DNA in the blood of the patients. 

They should have known that there is a big difference between blood and plasma. In medicine, plasma is the supernatant of the unclotted whole blood (containing anticoagulants) after centrifugation to spin down the RBCs, WBCs and platelets. Since the authors are experts in Lyme disease, they should have known how Borrelia burgdorferi cells distribute in the blood fractions when being centrifuged. For example, even the Google AI clearly stated the following: 

AI Overview

Yes, it’s generally understood that Borrelia (the bacterium that causes Lyme disease) is significantly heavier than platelets.

AI Overview

Studies have shown that when Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacterium that causes Lyme disease) is introduced into whole blood, it tends to concentrate within the platelet fraction. This suggests that Borrelia may have a similar sedimentation rate to platelets, or that it associates with platelets during the sedimentation process.

Here’s a closer look at what we know about the sedimentation rates of platelets and Borrelia:

Platelet sedimentation

Antisedimentation: Interestingly, platelets don’t actually “sediment” in the traditional sense of settling downwards in response to gravity. Instead, they float on top of the blood column, a phenomenon known as antisedimentation.

-Dr Lee: “The bottom line is that Klempner lost all the Borrelia cells, if any, in the blood specimens before he started his PCR that obviously generated false-negative results.” 

So, Dr. Klempner…. It appears that my original assessment was correct and your methodology was fatally flawed as suspected. Let me remind you that as an NIH funded author, you have a moral obligation to acknowledge mistakes which ultimately set the stage for long-term treatment denial.

A response to this inquiry is requested,
Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH

2018 Inquiry to Dr. Klempner….. 

From: Carl Tuttle [mailto:runagain@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 7:54 AM
To: mark.klempner@umassmed.edu
Cc: michael.collins@umassmed.edu; ddutko@hanszenlaporte.com; ryan.kantor@usdoj.gov; michelle.seltzer@usdoj.gov; william.rinner@usdoj.gov; makan.delrahim@usdoj.gov; Tick-Borne Disease Working Group (OS/OASH); Elias, John; officeofthechancellor@umassmed.edu
Subject: Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease

April 27, 2018

University of Massachusetts Medical School
55 Lake Avenue North
Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
Attn: Mark S. Klempner, MD, Executive Vice Chancellor, MassBiologics

Dr. Klempner,

I would like to call attention to the attached study recently identifying chronic Lyme disease in twelve patients from Canada.

Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease
http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/33

All of these patients were culture positive for infection (genital secretions, skin “Morgellons” and blood) even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics.

In contrast, your 2001 antibiotic treatment study found; “no evidence of B. burgdorferi in a total of more than 700 different blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples from the 129 patients in these studies.”

Two Controlled Trials of Antibiotic Treatment in Patients with Persistent Symptoms and a History of Lyme Disease
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200107123450202#article_references#t=references

Not a single positive Dr. Klempner? Doesn’t this statistically prove that your methodology was fatally flawed?

Did you culture skin and genital secretions as the Middelveen paper reports? It would appear that you conveniently stopped looking after your results supported the existing thirty year dogma; chronic Lyme does not exist.

Persistent Lyme disease is not new and has been intentionally/deceitfully suppressed for decades as described in the Vicki Logan case identified in the following letter to past CDC Director Barbara Fitzgerald:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xaul84dqmqgbre0/Brenda%20Fitzgerald%20MD%20Director%20CDC.docx?dl=0
In 1991 B. burgdorferi had been isolated in culture from Vicki Logan’s CSF (CDC’s laboratory in Fort Collins CO.) despite prior treatment with 21 days of IV cefotaxime and 4 months of oral minocycline.

The dishonest science here in the U.S. has denied chronic Lyme which stifled research to find a curative approach. Now the rest of the world is suffering.

We have lost nearly four decades to this 21st century plague due to the racketeering scheme identified in the RICO lawsuit filed by SHRADER & ASSOCIATES, LLP against the Infectious Disease Society of America, seven IDSA Panelists and eight insurance companies. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has aligned itself with the seven IDSA Panelists identified in this lawsuit.

Court Document:
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/LymeDisease.pdf

Lyme is an incurable disease when not treated immediately which is spreading across North America and deceitfully misclassified as a low-risk and non-urgent health issue. Patient experience is describing a disease that is destroying lives, ending careers, causing death and disability while leaving victims in financial ruin. Current antimicrobials are ineffective for eradicating all forms of the Borrelia spirochete.

Public outcry has been ignored for decades while the Centers for Disease Control sat on evidence that this infection was not easily treated with a one size fits all treatment approach as dictated by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Once again your studies were fatally flawed while supporting the controlling dogma leaving hundreds of thousands if not millions worldwide with a persistent infection and absolutely no relief. We have another AIDS on our hands.

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

Cc: -Michael F. Collins, Chancellor

-The Tick Borne Disease Working Group

-US Department of Justice

-Daniel R. Dutko, HANSZEN LAPORTE

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Testing

Podcast on EBOO & TPE

https://www.betterhealthguy.com/episode222

Episode #222: EBOO and TPE: Breakthrough Therapies for Chronic Illness with Dr. Tami Lyday, DO, MS

 
EBOO stands for Extracorporeal Blood Oxygenation and Ozonation & TPE stands for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange.

Watch The Show

Listen To The Show

Find The Show

About My Guest

My guest for this episode is Dr. Tami Lyday.  Tami Lyday, DO, MS has been a physician since 2006 and a functional and integrative specialist since 2017. Prior to that, she spent 11 years as a family practitioner but was never quite satisfied with conventional medical approaches.  Her mother’s illness and subsequent side effects of traditional treatments prompted her to learn more about integrative medicine, and she has not looked back.  Dr. Lyday believes functional and integrative medicine is the best way to ensure lasting recovery as it helps patients determine the root of their health issues and does not rely on medications that treat symptoms while ignoring the underlying causes of illness.  She pursued training and certifications in functional and integrative medicine, including specialty training and certifications in the treatment of mold-related illnesses and Lyme disease. At the time of her certification, she was one of only 26 practitioners in the world who were Shoemaker certified in mold treatment protocols.  After 4 years as a functional and integrative medical practitioner, she opened The Lyday Center to provide a dedicated resource for people who are suffering from mystery illnesses and ailments that don’t respond to conventional treatment and are seeking natural solutions to their chronic illnesses.  Since that time, she has expanded her specialties to include the treatment of thyroid disorders and overall energy levels.  Her mission is to heal the world one patient at a time.

Key Takeaways

  • How much does environmental toxicity contribute to chronic illness?
  • How is a patient tested for mold illness?
  • What binders are most commonly used for detoxification?  Do natural binders have a place?
  • What is the role of Actinobacteria and endotoxins in CIRS patients?
  • Can a patient have fungal colonization and potentially benefit from antifungals?
  • Does treating mold also treat Lyme and coinfections?
  • How important is working on the limbic system to set the stage for healing?
  • How might EBOO and TPE support those with autoimmunity?
  • Where in a recovery timeline do EBOO and TPE best fit?
  • Does Hashimoto’s occur without mold?
  • What is the role of EBOO?  What is the EBOO process?
  • What is done before and after EBOO to support the patient?
  • Can patients have detoxification or Herxheimer reactions after EBOO or TPE?
  • How might EBOO and TPE help those with Long COVID?
  • What types of infections might EBOO support?
  • What is the role of TPE?  What is the TPE process?
  • What types of toxicants and toxins can be filtered out?
  • How is the removed plasma replaced?
  • Might beneficial materials be removed with TPE?
  • Can EBOO or TPE help those with neurodegenerative conditions?

Connect With My Guest

TheLydayCenter.com

(See link for podcast and transcript)

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Treatment

Tariffs Used to Propel UN Sustainable Development Goals, More on Digital ID & Climate Change Hoax Reveal

The reason for posting this information is due to the fact if implemented, Digital ID will negatively affect Lyme/MSIDS patients and their medical care.  It will make things infinitely worse than they currently are.  COVID hopefully made it abundantly clear to all that medical experts and scientists with dissenting voices were and are being censored and silenced – something we in Lymeland have lived for over 40 years.  

In this interview, journalist Alex Newman explains that in the 50 and 5 Plan (to get 50 countries to implement it in the next five years or 2028) Bill Gates and the UN are uniting to create a ‘digital public infrastructure’ or universal blockchain ledger that will tokenize everything. Digital ‘health’ certificates or ‘vaccine’ passports will be a part of this control grid as well as programmable CBDCs where they can control what you buy, sell, eat, use, etc.  If you think it’s hard to get Lyme/MSIDS treatment now, just wait.

This diabolical plan reduces human life to a QR code.

Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of the UK, has just been activated to implement a ‘free’ but mandatory  digital ID, the gateway setup for a full-blown social credit score nightmare.

“Let me spell that out. You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have Digital ID. It’s as simple as that.”  ~ Keir Starmer, UK Prime Minister

The very good news is over 2 MILLION folks in the UK have signed a petition against mandatory digital ID.

Globalists are reverting back to COVID era tactics to exclude anyone from society that doesn’t cow-tow to tyranny.

In fact, independent journalist Whitney Webb calls Digital ID a tool of exclusion.  She states globalists don’t only want a cashless society, but a cardless society as well.  People will pay with their face or hand using their personal biometrics.  It will be quite easy to shut people out of the system if they refuse to use their biometrics for this purpose.

The Dark Side of Tariffs

Please watch this important 5 Min video by Greg Reese on how the newly imposed tariffs hide a darker agenda: forcing and/or bartering with countries to adopt the digital ID. 

Under the auspice of ‘information sharing,’ ‘daily workflows,’ ‘access to platforms and buildings,’ ‘operating across agencies by proving personnel with a universal system-wide identity solution,’ with all of your personal, H.R., medical, travel, security, payroll, and pension data in the palm of your hand, we are all expected to clamor to be imprisoned by our own data that we supposedly have ‘full control’ over. Digital ID has already been piloted by different agencies & the UN pension fund where they’ve already replaced manual processes.

If this is innovation that will unlock sustainability goals (SDGs) count me out.

UK MP Nigel Farage states there is no need for Starmer to push digital ID since they already have digital IDs to ensure migrants have the right to work in the UK. Five years ago in the U.S. Trump was all in on a ‘biometric entry-exit visa tracking system,’ to be used on land, sea, and air.  As Reese aptly points out: in order for such a system to be effective, everyone will need to be in the system. 

That means you and me.

People in Mexico are required to obtain CURP to live legally and comfortably in their own country.  Besides a QR code with both fingerprint and retinal scan, CURP will share real time geolocation data with Mexican authorities allowing them to shut down service and block digital platforms.

See World Council for Health’s policy brief on unregulated digitalization.

http://

UN Agenda 21 in 5 Min

Rosa Koire, author of The Green Mask

“The goal is to control you.” ~ Rosa Koire, former Executive Director Post Sustainability Institute and Democrats Against UN Agenda 21

Don’t have five minutes?  Watch this one that’s about 3 Min:

http://

“The goal, of course, is to transfer power from local and individuals to a global governance system.” ~ Rosa Koire

“As explained by journalist Whitney Webb, the globalist push for Digital ID is the fundamental linchpin of a new, Orwellian control system. Without mass public compliance, their entire architecture of programmable CBDCs, social credit scores, and a predictive surveillance state collapses.

They are investing billions in manipulative sales pitches, framing biometric Digital ID as the voluntary, convenient solution to every modern ill: illegal migration, voter fraud, cybercrime, and more. This is a deliberate strategy. They want us to choose our own enclosure because coercion is expensive and breeds resistance.

This is the ultimate manipulation: to make you believe you are powerless while simultaneously begging for your voluntary participation. The convenience is the carrot—the promise of an easier life through your smartphone. But this convenience is a trap designed to enslave.” Source  (By clicking on source you can listen to Webb)

Since Digital ID is the ultimate endgame, ‘leaders’ can now publicly admit climate change is a hoax…..despite the fact only .3% of scientists believe humanity is causing climate change.

This is important for many reasons, one of which is the importance of understanding that the entire peer-review process is another scam lining the pockets of the few while leaving patients to suffer.

Just today James O’Keefe exposed a senior DOJ Jeffrey Epstein investigator saying ‘Epstein was CIA, and an asset for the U.S. and Israel’ and that Trump is protecting a lot of people by sealing the files.  Please note the connection with Robert Maxwell (Epstein’s lover and convicted sex offender Guislaine Maxell’s father) who founded Pergamon Press later purchased by Elsevier which published medical books and journals propelling the COVID/vaccine narrative.  Powerful people control what we see and hear and always manage to slip out of accountability.  

The same day Charlie Kirk was shot the US Senate voted 511-49 against releasing the Epstein Files.
Science tribalism has led to mass censorship where dissenters are persecuted.

Heads of public agencies entrusted with public health have become nothing more than narrative spinners – devoid of all logic, decency, common sense, ethics, and honesty.

Agenda 21 depends upon the narrative for ‘Climate Change,’ as green energy solutions are not only a scam that have made the climate worse, but Big, Big business that diverts money into pet projects like ESG and DEI, that do nothing for society but make it worse.  These projects can and will be used against people.  The doomsday predictions are not aging well, and Jefferey Jaxen and Del Big Tree dismantle the entire sea level scare.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/trump-on-climate-change-the-greatest?

Trump on Climate Change: “The Greatest Con Job Ever”

Trump opens fire on the Climate Change Cult at his UN Speech on Sept. 23, 2025.

John Leake
Sep 24, 2025

Trump excoriated the international Climate Change Cult during his UN address on September 23, 2025. As he bluntly put it:

“This ‘climate change,’ it’s the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion,” Trump said. “All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong. They were made by stupid people that have cost their countries fortunes and given those same countries no chance for success. If you don’t get away from this green scam, your country is going to fail.”

Mainstream media coverage of Trump’s speech was characteristically shallow. ABC News quoted a “climate scientist” named Adelle Thomas.

For Adelle Thomas, a climate scientist who has published more than 40 studies and has a doctorate, climate change disasters are personal, too. A vice chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s top body on climate science, Thomas is from the Bahamas and said she experienced firsthand “the devastation of the climate disaster” when Hurricane Sandy hit the Caribbean and New York City, the city Trump was speaking from, in 2012.

Critical readers may wonder why Adelle Thomas would point to Sandy—a Category 3 hurricane—as evidence of human induced “climate change.”

The most destructive hurricane in recorded history was the Great Hurricane of 1780, a Category 5 hurricane that struck Barbados, causing massive damage to the entire island. Based on observations recorded at the time—including pieces of straw driven deep into tree trunks—the hurricane is estimated to have produced 200 mph wind. The Great Hurricane also struck other islands in the Lesser Antilles, is considered the deadliest in Atlantic history, with total fatalities possibly reaching over 22,000.

The Great Hurricane of 1780 struck earth’s population was about 780 million, before most of humanity industrialized.

(See link for article)

_______________

The climate is continually being blamed for tick expansion and Lyme disease proliferation despite independent research refuting this. Shoddy, biased research is pushing an accepted narrative, and media is using corrupt data as the next ‘pandemic-like’ story that they will beat to absolute death.

More data is exposing the narrative, and more and more researchers are finally speaking out against this government & globalist agenda which is big, big business.

80% of carbon offset schemes are ‘likely junk or worthless,’ and green energy policies have made the climate worse.  ‘Science tribalism’ is the norm to obtain highly sought after government grants for research, and science has little to do with it.

Please go here to watch an informative video on the staggering amount of energy and resources required to build a single wind turbine.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Climate, Lyme

Is Babesia Blocking Your Recovery From Lyme Disease?

https://www.lymedisease.org/is-babesia-blocking-your-recovery-from-lyme-disease/

Is Babesia blocking your recovery from Lyme disease?

By Dorothy Kupcha Leland
Sept. 15, 2025

Lyme disease is increasingly being recognized as a complex chronic illness, often tangled up with co-infections and overlapping conditions that make it difficult to pinpoint what’s really going on.

One of the trickiest players in this mix is Babesia. Even though it can come from the same tick bite as Lyme, it’s a separate infection, and it needs its own testing and treatment. Left unaddressed, Babesia can derail recovery, leaving patients with persistent symptoms and few answers.

Dr. Alexis Chesney, a naturopathic physician and Lyme specialist, has just published an article in NDNR (Naturopathic Doctor News & Review) titled “The Diagnosis and Treatment of Babesiosis: A Naturopathic Approach to an Emerging Tick-Borne Disease.”

As she explains, Babesia is a malaria-like parasite that infects red blood cells. It can cause symptoms ranging from crushing fatigue and night sweats to shortness of breath and heart palpitations. And although it often accompanies Lyme disease, it doesn’t respond to the same treatment. That means that if Babesia isn’t identified and treated properly, you are missing an essential step in your quest to get better.

Dr. Chesney’s article offers:

  • A clear explanation of how babesiosis is diagnosed, including which tests are most reliable.
  • A look at naturopathic treatment options, including herbs, supplements, and detox strategies.
  • A balanced approach that integrates conventional and natural medicine.

You can read the full article here. And if you’re navigating tick-borne illness, consider sharing it with your provider. It might just change the course of your treatment.

TOUCHED BY LYME is written by Dorothy Kupcha Leland, President of LymeDisease.org. She is co-author of Finding Resilience: A Teen’s Journey Through Lyme Disease and of When Your Child Has Lyme Disease: A Parent’s Survival Guide. Contact her at dleland@lymedisease.org.

For more:

Category:

Babesia, Lyme