Author Archive

Myocarditis After COVID-19 mRNA Shots But Just Mask Up & Shut Up

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2109975?

Myocarditis after Covid-19 mRNA Vaccination

This letter was published on August 18, 2021, at NEJM.org.

TO THE EDITOR:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the United States after coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination.1 In recently published reports, diagnosis of myocarditis was made with the use of noninvasive imaging and routine laboratory testing.2-5 Here, we report two cases of histologically confirmed myocarditis after Covid-19 mRNA vaccination.

Figure 1. Histopathological Findings from Endomyocardial Biopsy and Autopsy.

Patient 1, a 45-year-old woman without a viral prodrome, presented with dyspnea and dizziness 10 days after BNT162b2 vaccination (first dose). A nasopharyngeal viral panel was negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza A and B, enteroviruses, and adenovirus (Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). A serum polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay and serologic tests showed no evidence of active parvovirus, enterovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, or infection with SARS-CoV-2. At presentation, she had tachycardia; ST-segment depression detected on electrocardiography, which was most prominent in the lateral leads (Fig. S1); and a troponin I level of 6.14 ng per milliliter (reference range, 0 to 0.30). A transthoracic echocardiogram showed severe global left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction, 15 to 20%) and normal left ventricular dimensions. Right heart catheterization revealed elevated right- and left-sided filling pressures and a cardiac index of 1.66 liters per minute per square meter of body-surface area as measured by the Fick method. Coronary angiography revealed no obstructive coronary artery disease. An endomyocardial biopsy specimen showed an inflammatory infiltrate predominantly composed of T-cells and macrophages, admixed with eosinophils, B cells, and plasma cells (Figure 1A and Figs. S2 through S4). She received inotropic support, intravenous diuretics, methylprednisolone (1 g daily for 3 days), and, eventually, guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure (lisinopril, spironolactone, and metoprolol succinate). Seven days after presentation, her ejection fraction was 60%, and she was discharged home.

Patient 2, a 42-year-old man, presented with dyspnea and chest pain 2 weeks after mRNA-1273 vaccination (second dose). He did not report a viral prodrome, and a PCR test was negative for SARS-CoV-2 (Table S1). He had tachycardia and a fever, and his electrocardiogram showed diffuse ST-segment elevation (Fig. S1). A transthoracic echocardiogram showed global biventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction, 15%), normal ventricular dimensions, and left ventricular hypertrophy. Coronary angiography revealed no coronary artery disease. Cardiogenic shock developed in the patient, and he died 3 days after presentation. An autopsy revealed biventricular myocarditis (Figure 1B and Figs. S5 and S6). An inflammatory infiltrate admixed with macrophages, T-cells, eosinophils, and B cells was observed, a finding similar to that in Patient 1.

In these two adult cases of histologically confirmed, fulminant myocarditis that had developed within 2 weeks after Covid-19 vaccination, a direct causal relationship cannot be definitively established because we did not perform testing for viral genomes or autoantibodies in the tissue specimens. However, no other causes were identified by PCR assay or serologic examination.

Amanda K. Verma, M.D.
Kory J. Lavine, M.D., Ph.D.
Chieh-Yu Lin, M.D., Ph.D.
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

________________________

https://www.brighteon.com/b3d87a5a-faea-4341-bab6-0406b9d356f5  4 Min. Video Here

The HighWire with Del Bigtree
Published Aug. 16, 2021

‘MASK UP AND SHUT UP’

Entering the ridiculous, public health officials are now asking people not to talk to stop the Covid virus. Jefferey Jaxen dives into the science behind the latest Covid mitigation suggestion.

__________________

**Comment**

The video is revealing on many fronts:

  • Propaganda is alive and well.
  • The paper “Viral Load of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Aerosols Emitted By COVID-19 Patients While Breathing, Talking, and Singing,” has numerous disclaimers in fine print, namely, that they couldn’t mechanically retrieve and isolate a viable virus from ambient air in the vicinity of patients.  Well, that’s inconvenient.
  • This study demonstrates perfectly the hypocrisy of our corrupt public health ‘authorities’ in that they demand perfectly done randomized, controlled trials on thousands of patients to approve COVID treatments, completely ignoring clinical results, but will accept and propagate poorly done science that pushes their continued fear narrative that lines their pockets. And even when there properly done RCTs they ignore them and then go on a smear campaign to malign them, and implement bandwagon to make the public believe their accepted narrative.
  • This duplicity has been going on in Lyme-land for over 40 years and continues today.  Hopefully people are waking up to it.

What’s Behind This Epidemic of Chronic, Inflammatory Conditions?

https://www.lymedisease.org/kinderlehrer-epigenetics/

What’s behind this epidemic of chronic, inflammatory conditions?

by Daniel A. Kinderlehrer MD

I have witnessed many changes in the over 40 years I’ve been a doctor, including epidemic rises in multiple medical conditions.

I’m not talking about the present pandemic, nor am I referring to the opioid crisis, another devastating epidemic that has taken the lives of over 500,000 Americans. I’m talking about chronic conditions that cause a slow burn and sometimes kill.

Lyme disease is but one example.

But think how things have changed since the beginning of the previous century: heart disease was barely on the radar in 1900, but for over 50 years it has been the number one cause of death in the U.S.1

A whopping 69% of Americans are now overweight, with 36.5% obese,2 directly contributing to the skyrocketing incidence of adult-onset diabetes mellitus.3 When I was in training in the 1970s, I never saw a patient with AODM who was under 40 years old. Now, it is being diagnosed in children.

And then there are the dramatic increases in autism spectrum disorder,4 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD),5 autoimmune conditions,6 some types of cancer7 and food allergies.8

Food sensitivities, mental health

Twenty-five years ago, when I had a large environmental medicine practice, most of my patients with food sensitivities reacted to one or more of a half dozen foods: milk, corn, eggs, wheat, citrus, or sugar/yeast. It was easy to put patients on an elimination diet: fish, lamb, vegetables, legumes, potatoes and rice. Now people react to avocados, rice, and anything under the sun.

And, of course, there’s the rise in mental health disorders. Even before the Covid pandemic, the World Health Organization predicted that depression would become the leading cause of death globally.9

According to the CDC, in 2019, 19% of Americans suffered from depression and 7% were moderately to severely affected.10 Among adults, suicidal ideation is increasing. Suicide has become the second leading cause of death in children and adolescents ages 13 to 19—and the leading cause of death among 13 year-olds.11 (Among all Americans, it is the tenth leading cause of death.11)

The role of epigenetics

There are a host of factors that determine the how, where and why illness occurs. These include genetic proclivity, lifestyle, trauma, diet, exposures to microbes and toxins. But here is what is further catapulting these seemingly disparate epidemics: a change in the human condition that we now understand as epigenetics.

While it takes millennia of natural selection to change our genes, specific proteins that turn genes on and off can alter gene expression in a single generation. Epigenetics explains how a change in expression of genes can be passed from one generation to the next without actually changing the DNA. There are literally thousands of conditions that can cause epigenetic changes.

Nutrient deficiencies, for example exacerbated by soil depletion, can activate epigenetic changes that result in neurological issues from mood and behavioral disorders to cognitive dysfunction, and these problems are passed on to subsequent generations.12,13 Epigenetics helps explain why the skyrocketing sugar intake in our diets is causing obesity.14,15

Chemical exposures also have epigenetic consequences. Over the past century, we have been exposed to hundreds of thousands of chemicals that are new to human existence. Pesticides, insecticides, herbicides, and other chemicals all have the potential to modify epigenetic activity.16 Countless agents now ubiquitous in daily life, from air pollution to air fresheners and fabric softeners can negatively impact overall health.17,18

Societal changes

But it is not only diet, nutrition, and exposure to toxic chemicals that have changed in the past century. Another factor which has undergone radical transformation is the social milieu. The social sphere, which used to revolve around communities, has devolved to extended families, then to nuclear families, then single-parent families, and now, tragically at times, to homeless families or solitude.

It is no longer routine for people to go next door to be held by grandma, or move in with aunts and uncles when the going at home gets rough. In essence, safe shelter has disappeared. This lack of safety is compounded for survivors of childhood trauma, who often develop epigenetic abnormalities and thus pass the trauma on to their offspring.19

Intergenerational trauma

That’s right—PTSD can be inherited. A review paper by Rachel Yehuda and Amy Lehrner on intergenerational transmission of trauma and the role of epigenetic mechanisms states:

“There is now converging evidence supporting the idea that offspring are affected by parental trauma exposures occurring before their birth, and possibly even prior to their conception. On the simplest level, the concept of intergenerational trauma acknowledges that exposure to extremely adverse events impacts individuals to such a great extent that their offspring find themselves grappling with their parents’ post‐traumatic state.”20

PTSD is not only a psychological disorder, it triggers increasing dysregulation of an individual’s neurobiology.21

Other social factors also have an enormous impact on health and well-being. Social isolation is a major risk factor for depression.22 The chronic stresses of poverty, racism, homophobia, and misogyny not only make for a bad day, they act on our biochemical pathways impacting immune, hormonal, and neurological function.23

The long-term release of the stress hormone cortisol and of proteins called cytokines (which regulate the body’s immune system response) can cause even more damage. These biochemical messengers, in turn, can result in epigenetic changes that are passed on to future generations.24

We’re not born with a clean slate

Epigenetic transmission means that both physical and emotional traumas are cumulative over generations. Newborns are not born with a clean slate. And these alterations in epigenetics are manifesting in a tsunami that is destabilizing individuals’ core regulatory systems.

Increasingly, people respond as if they have continuous PTSD—their nervous and immune systems going haywire at both real and imagined threats, with all the downstream consequences evident in an increasingly sick population.

Which brings us back to PANS, which I have discussed in the past few articles.

I think we are witnessing an epidemic of autoimmune reactivity to multiple agents in the environment—like foods, viruses, bacteria, and mold. We are clearly seeing it with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). When autoimmune reactivity results in neuroinflammation, it can result in cognitive dysfunction, PANS and a panoply of mental health disorders—for generations to come.

We need to become more cognizant of the cumulative stresses that result in combined mental and physical issues, and address them at their core.

Dr. Daniel Kinderlehrer is an internal medicine physician in Denver, Colorado, with a practice devoted to treating patients with tick-borne illness. He is the author of  Recovery From Lyme Disease: The Integrative Medicine Guide to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Tick-Borne Illness.

References

  1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24811552/
  2. https://www.healthline.com/health/obesity-facts#1.-More-than-one-third-of-adults-in-the-United-States-are-obese.
  3. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6712a2.htm
  4. https://www.statista.com/statistics/676354/autism-rate-among-children-select-countries-worldwide/
  5. https://chadd.org/adhd-weekly/is-there-an-increase-in-adhd/
  6. https://www.immunology.org/news/report-reveals-the-rising-rates-autoimmune-conditions
  7. https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/12/09/cancer-rates-are-on-the-rise-in-adolescents-and-young-adults-new-study-shows/?sh=5d56188c3b7b
  8. https://www.news-medical.net/health/Whats-Driving-the-Recent-Rise-in-Food-Allergies.aspx
  9. Tucci V, Moukaddam N. We are the hollow men: The worldwide epidemic of mental illness, psychiatric and behavioral emergencies, and its impact on patients and providers. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2017;10(1):4-6. doi:10.4103/0974-2700.199517
  10. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db379.htm
  11. https://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/leadcause.html
  12. Liu J, Zhao SR, Reyes T. Neurological and Epigenetic Implications of Nutritional Deficiencies on Psychopathology: Conceptualization and Review of Evidence. Qi L, ed. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(8):18129-18148.
  13. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/soil-depletion-and-nutrition-loss/
  14. https://www.tasteofhome.com/article/american-sugar-intake/
  15. Ling C, Rönn T. Epigenetics in Human Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Cell Metab. 2019;29(5):1028-1044.
  16. Collotta M1, Bertazzi PA, Bollati V. Epigenetics and pesticides. Toxicology. 2013 May 10;307:35-41.
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132316304334
  18. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/greener-laundry/
  19. Matosin N, Cruceanu C, Binder EB. Preclinical and Clinical Evidence of DNA Methylation Changes in Response to Trauma and Chronic Stress. Chronic stress (Thousand Oaks). 2017;1:10.
  20. Yehuda R, Lehrner A. Intergenerational transmission of trauma effects: putative role of epigenetic mechanisms. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(3):243-257.
  21. McFarlane AC. The long-term costs of traumatic stress: intertwined physical and psychological consequences. World Psychiatry. 2010;9(1):3-10.
  22. Bhatti AB, Haq A ul. The Pathophysiology of Perceived Social Isolation: Effects on Health and Mortality. Muacevic A, Adler JR, eds. Cureus. 2017;9(1):e994.
  23. Song H et. al. Association of Stress-Related Disorders With Subsequent Autoimmune Disease. 2018;319(23):2388-2400.
  24. Notterman DA, Mitchell C. Epigenetics and Understanding the Impact of Social Determinants of Health. Pediatr Clinics North Am. 2015;62(5):1227-1240.

____________________

**Comment**

I’ve got news for you: vaccines are also stressors.  They can reactivate latent infections including but not limited to Lyme/MSIDS.  They can also be contaminated with retroviruses, viruses, cancer, parasites, metals, graphene oxide, poly–ethylene glycol (PEG) and ethylene alcohol, and other harmful nanoparticles.  And all gene-based vaccines such as the COVID jabs can be expected to cause blood clotting and bleeding disorders based on their molecular mechanisms of action. Further, the spike protein is a dangerous toxin causing untold damage.

Vaccines have been and are a source of destruction that is being put directly into bodies of millions worldwide. It is the “golden calf” no one wants to talk about, or is censored and bullied if they do, but is THE elephant in the room.

“A Tick Bite Turned Me Into the Bionic Woman – Entirely Preventable”

https://www.lymedisease.org/bradshaw-lyme-bionic-woman/

“A tick bite turned me into the bionic woman–entirely preventable”

The following public comments were provided by telephone to the federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group on August 26.

My name is Meghan Bradshaw and I’m 28 years old. I’m here to share my story as a patient to demonstrate the magnitude of devastation that tick-borne diseases can cause.

My experience is unique, but it is similar to so many others in that the lack of accurate diagnostics led me to a situation that was entirely preventable.

Just a few years ago, I was an active, independent 20-something-year-old living in a bustling city. My career trajectory was moving quickly. But simultaneously I was battling with my health and had a steady, then very rapid decline.

Despite extensive lifestyle changes – eliminating alcohol, anti-inflammatory diet, and countless medication – I saw no changes, although I was doing what my doctors told me were “all the right things.”

Over the last few years, I have seen dozens of doctors across a spectrum of specialties at some of the most prominent medical institutions – Vanderbilt University and the world-renowned Cleveland Clinic. Not once were vector-borne illnesses ever considered to be the culprit.

Misdiagnosed, improperly treated

In 2017, I was improperly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and followed the standard protocol of immunosuppressant therapeutics. This improper diagnosis is what ultimately opened the floodgates to allow the underlying tick-borne disease infections in my body to run rampant.

In October 2019 I started a series of surgeries:

  • Left knee synovectomy and meniscectomy
  • Bilateral total hip replacements
  • Bilateral total shoulder reverse arthroplasty
  • Proximal Interphalangeal Fusion on digits 2-5 Left hand
  • Last week, I had fusion of PIP digits 2-5 Right hand

Additionally, I am slated for

  • Bilateral knee, elbow and ankle replacements
  • Left wrist replacement

Also to note, nearly a dozen other joints have auto fused.

It’s one thing to list all these out, but to live it out daily, is an overwhelming burden- both functionally and financially.

I require assistance with virtually everything-bathing, toileting, grooming, dressing, feeding.

My fine motor skills are comparable to those of a toddler.

As a result of my immobility, I’ve had total muscular atrophy, losing over 60 pounds in less than a year, which is about 1/3 of my body composition, as I am 5’3”.

Physiological and emotional devastation

I want to stress not only the physiological and emotional devastation that lack of education in the medical community can cause, but also the extreme financial devastation that so many patients suffer from.

Over the last 24 months, my medical bills have totaled over $600,000 in extensive amounts of surgeries, hospital stays, therapeutics, and physical therapy. My family has spent nearly $200,000 out of pocket alone.

And to think that this is the result of inaccurate diagnostic tools and lack of education for a disease that impacts nearly half a million Americans every year.

For an illness that is twice as common as breast cancer, why are we not incorporating testing for tick-borne illnesses in our routine exams like a mammogram?

Tick safety education ought to be a part of our school health curriculum, just like sex ed. These are simple, cost-effective, preventative measures that we should be implementing to prevent potentially devastating outcomes.

I want to reiterate that I share my story not looking for sympathy but hoping to inspire change. There is not a shadow of a doubt in my mind that had there been better clinical education and accurate diagnostic tools available, I would not be in the position that I am today.

A tick bite turned me into the bionic woman, and this was entirely preventable.

Meghan Bradshaw lives in North Carolina. To hear more of her journey, listen to her recent interview on the Tick Boot Camp Podcast.

Click here to listen

The Great Ivermectin Deworming Hoax

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/the-great-ivermectin-deworming-hoax/

The great Ivermectin deworming hoax

writer’s pseudonym, graduated summa cum laude from Wabash College where he was named a Lilly Scholar. He attended Baylor College of Medicine where he was awarded the M.D. degree. He completed a residency in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation at The University of California Irvine Medical Center. He is board-certified and has taught at The University of California Davis Medical Center in the departments of Family Practice and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. He has practiced medicine for over 35 years and maintains a private practice in Northern California.

In a normal year, the Kentucky Poison Control Center might receive one call from someone who has taken ivermectin, a drug commonly used to treat parasites in livestock. But amid increasing misinformation about the drug’s ability to both treat and prevent COVID-19, that number has increased to six this year.

This alarming news was published in Spectrum News – formerly known as Time Warner Cable – on August 24, 2021, and should be a lesson to every American.

https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2021/08/24/ivermectin-calls-to-kentucky-poison-control-are-up

The lesson is not about Ivermectin being poisonous because it isn’t, but about the pervasiveness of a type of new internet propaganda termed “informational flooding.”

(See link for article)

______________________

**Comment**

Beautiful article.  Please share.

I’m sure the author, a bona fide doctor using a pseudonym, is afraid of retaliation for this expose’ on how corrupt public ‘authorities’ are handling the treatment of ivermectin. Doctors are being threatened on a daily basis for defying the accepted narrative, a phenomenon that’s been happening for over 40-years in Lyme-land.

Important quote:

It was all untrue. We were all lied to.

We’ve heard this before.  Believe NOTHING you have been told. It’s all been a:

“pack of lies, from start to finish – pure propaganda.”  Dr. Hodgkinson

Also, regarding the assertion that Ivermectin is confined to animals:

On the contrary, Ivermectin is used every day for scabies and is not confined to animals any more than penicillin is purely an animal antibiotic.

I will also add that it is a common drug in the treatment of Lyme/MSIDS, due to the fact ticks also can transmit worms to humans.

Another important quote:

The fact that Ivermectin is so much SAFER than over-the-counter Tylenol should make you wonder exactly why these articles made the news. The reason is simple.

Pfizer and Merck are getting ready to launch expensive new anti-viral pills that can provide early outpatient treatment for COVID-19 and perhaps even be used preventatively. Yet Ivermectin remains effective, cheap, and safe and thus poses a HUGE threat to their profits.

BINGO.

The article also clearly points out that these new medicines will be 100-1,000 times pricier and have already been funded by the U.S. government to the tune of 1.2 BILLION.  This simply means WE, through our tax dollars have already paid for it.

Merck already knows Ivermectin is safe, as they developed it and have used it in over three BILLION doses IN HUMANS for River Blindness.

Well, there’s an inconvenient truth.

The author then painstakingly goes through the Ivermectin research on its success with COVID and points out there are 63 AND COUNTING studies involving 26,000 patients showing a 96% reduction in DEATH. 

Case closed.

Do not believe these charlatans who have patents on nearly every aspect of COVID and their minions who either blindly follow these characters or are in on the game.  A good doctor doesn’t blindly follow others.

For more:

US COVID Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm Than Good Based On Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific–1811.pdf

US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”

Classen Immunotherapies, Inc, 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester, MD
J. Bart Classen, MD*

Trends in Internal Medicine

Research Article
Citation: Classen B. US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed
Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”. Trends Int Med. 2021; 1(1): 1-6.

*
Correspondence:
J. Bart Classen, MD, Classen Immunotherapies, Inc, 3637
Rockdale Road, Manchester, MD 21102, Tel: 410-377-8526, E-mail: Classen@vaccines.net.

Received: 24 July 2021; Accepted: 25 August 2021

ABSTRACT
Three COVID-19 vaccines in the US have been released for sale by the FDA under Emergency Use Authorization
(EUA) based on a clinical trial design employing a surrogate primary endpoint for health, severe infections with COVID-19. This clinical trial design has been proven dangerously misleading. Many fields of medicine, oncology for example, have abandoned the use of disease specific endpoints for the primary endpoint of pivotal clinical trials (cancer deaths for example) and have adopted “all cause mortality or morbidity” as the proper scientific endpoint of a clinical trial. Pivotal clinical trial data from the 3 marketed COVID-19 vaccines was reanalyzed using “all cause severe morbidity”, a scientific measure of health, as the primary endpoint. “All cause severe morbidity” in the treatment group and control group was calculated by adding all severe events reported in the clinical trials. Severe events included both severe infections with COVID-19 and all other severe adverse events in the treatment arm and control arm respectively. This analysis gives reduction in severe COVID-19 infections the same weight as adverse events of equivalent severity.

Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statically significant increase in “all cause severe morbidity” in the “vaccinated” group compared to the placebo group.

  • The Moderna immunized group suffered 3,042 more severe events than the control group (p=0.00001).
  • The Pfizer data was grossly incomplete but data provided showed the vaccination group suffered 90 more severe events than the control group (p=0.000014), when only including “unsolicited” adverse events.
  • The Janssen immunized group suffered 264 more severe events than the control group (p=0.00001).

These findings contrast the manufacturers’ inappropriate surrogate endpoints:

  • Janssen claims that their vaccine prevents 6 cases of severe COVD-19 requiring medical attention out of 19,630 immunized.
  • Pfizer claims their vaccine prevents 8 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 21,720 immunized.
  • Moderna claims its vaccine prevents 30 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 15,210 immunized.

Based on this data it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general.

Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe.

____________________

**Comment**

Important quote: 

Clinical trial data show there were actually few very “severe” cases of COVID-19 in either the vaccinated or the placebo group.

This fact is ignored by our corrupt public health ‘authorities’ who are pushing a continual narrative of fear, aided and abetted by a bought out media.  According to Doctors for COVID Ethics, these injections are “needless, ineffective, and dangerous.”

Also important from the study:

  • Moderna data shows that only one of 15,166 unvaccinated patients required admission to an intensive care unit for COVID-19.
  • Data provided by Janssen shows that only a few of the “severe” COVID-19 infections required medical intervention, yet the vaccinated group had 595 severe Grade 3 or 4 events in the first 28 days post immunization.
  • Table S10 in the appendix published in the New England Journal of Medicine [4] , shows only 2 of 19,514 patients immunized with the Janssen vaccine needed medical intervention for severe COVID-19
    infections starting 14 days after immunization, while only 8 of 19,544 controls needed medical intervention for severe COVID-19 infections starting 14 days after placebo, where the infection was confirmed by a central lab. This benefit, reduction in 6 case of COVID-19 requiring medical intervention, in 19,630 vaccinated patients is simply statistically insignificant in a population that has a hundred fold more severe events of any cause.
Reductions in infection rates, hospitalization rates and even death with COVID-19 are poor surrogate markers for health and are not proper primary endpoints for a vaccine clinical trial.
Science thus does not support a health benefit with COVID-19 vaccines. All arguments for immunization are purely philosophical and based on false, discredited, assumptions.

Earlier this week I posted this article which methodically goes through the data and math required to understand “vaccine” efficacy.  Again, as with the article above, in order to have good data, you must “count things and divide things which matter.”  Regarding efficacy, it’s imperative to know how many infected people went on to die in each group. The author states that while “vaccine” manufacturers proclaim “vaccine” efficacy of 90% or better, no information is available to suggest that the death rate (what truly matters) is any different in the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. Further, for certain age groups, the number actually leans towards a higher death rate among the “vaccinated.”

And then there’s the important issue of absolute risk.  Go here to read an important article that explains how “vaccine” manufacturers are purposely using a statistical trick to make the injections look far more protective than they are.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/08/24/first-signs-of-what-scientists-fear-most-about-covid-jabs-german-physicians-examine-covid-vaxxed-blood-its-not-good/  Excerpt: 

In a July 1, 2021, commentary in The Lancet Microbe,3 Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele and Michel Vaillant also argue for the use of absolute risk reduction when discussing vaccine efficacy with the public. They too went through the calculations, coming up with the following:

  • Pfizer/BioNTech — Relative risk reduction: 95%
    • Absolute risk reduction: 0.84%
  • Moderna — Relative risk reduction: 94%
    • Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
  • Gamaleya (Sputnic V) — Relative risk reduction: 91%
    • Absolute risk reduction: 0.93%
  • Johnson & Johnson — Relative risk reduction: 67%
    • Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
  • AstraZeneca/Oxford — Relative risk reduction: 67%
    • Absolute risk reduction: 1.3%
It’s abundantly clear that when you actually utilize endpoints that matter, these injections are not only worthless – they are dangerous.

For more of Classen’s work: