Madison Area Lyme Support Group

A renowned German pathologist has sounded the alarm on the number of fatal consequences of COVID-19 vaccinations being drastically underestimated, according to his findings.

Peter Schirmacher, the director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, who was admired by The Pathologist magazine as one of the world’s 100 most influential professionals in the field, stated that 30 to 40 percent of people who died within two weeks after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine and whom he performed an autopsy on died from the vaccination, according to the local outlet Augsburger Allgemeine.

The pathologist argues that just like cadavers of people who died from COVID-19, corpses of people who die within the short period of time after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine should be examined more frequently and meticulously. He added that currently, pathologists do not study possible connections between inoculation and a development of deadly health implications such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases. Since vaccinated people usually do not die under clinical observation, Schirmacher explains, “The doctor examining the corpse does not establish a context with the vaccination and certifies a natural death and the patient is buried. Or he certifies an unclear type of death, and the public prosecutor sees no third-party fault and releases the corpse for burial.”  (See link for article)

___________________

**Comment**

The administration of German Chancellor Angela Merkel rejected Schirmacher’s conclusions and declined his calls, stating that “vaccines are safe”. And the German medical regulatory body announced the Schirmacher’s statements are “incomprehensible.”  

In other words, nothing to see here.

The Federal Association of German Pathologists, also urging more autopsies of the vaccinated, requested the Health Minister to promote the practice back in March, but the lack of response demonstrates that authorities are pursing goals that have little connection with science or healthcare.

Other doctors are asking for autopsies of the “vaccinated” and that a report of just one autopsy after just one dose of the Pfizer shot, showed almost all tissues tested positive on PCR for SARS-CoV-2. The doctor also points out that a 45-year-old mother just died of heart issues and brain swelling, shortly after getting the COVID shot required before she could begin her job at Johns Hopkins University. There will be tears and flowers, but probably no autopsy – and no pause in the shots demanded for mothers and potential mothers if they want to work at JHU.

The ramifications of these injections can not be overstated.

The article also points out that the underreporting of vaccine-related deaths and adverse effects are also a problem in the U.S. and a lawsuit is currently in play due to a CDC whistleblower’s testimony that there are at least 45,000 deaths related to the COVID injections and that the CDC is under-reporting such deaths by a conservative factor of at least five.

According to Dr. Peter McCullough, since typically only 10 percent of vaccine-injury cases make it to VAERS, the death toll from the vaccines may actually be 10-fold higher than the official number. He also said a vaccine that leads to 150 deaths is usually withdrawn from use.  He feels the injections would have been shut down in February if there was a data and safety monitoring board.

For a little history lesson, the Swine Flu vaccine was dumped after 4,000 reported adverse events. Nine states suspended it two weeks after it began, after only 3 deaths in the elderly that weren’t even proven to be caused by the vaccine.

The reason for this is simple: it happened before vaccine manufacturers got a free pass.

According to 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22, “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.” Source

Also important to understand is how these “vaccine” manufacturers, besides having complete indemnity, are demanding that countries put up sovereign assets, including bank reserves, military bases & embassy buildings as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits.

http://

New Delhi-based World Is One News (WION) reported in February 2021 that Brazil rejected Pfizer’s demands, calling them “abusive.” The demands included that Brazil:²⁷

1. “Waives sovereignty of its assets abroad in favor of Pfizer”
2. Not apply its domestic laws to the company
3. Not penalize Pfizer for vaccine delivery delays
4. Exempt Pfizer from all civil liability for side effects