Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

CDC Data: COVID Mass Vaccination Has Had No Measurable Impact on COVID Mortality in U.S.

https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/covid-19-vaccines/

COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates: 20 Scientific Facts That Challenge the Assumptions

Fact 1: “all transmissions between patients and staff occurred between masked and vaccinated individuals, as experienced in an outbreak from Finland.” The authors state that the study “challenges the assumption that high universal vaccination rates will lead to herd immunity and prevent COVID-19 outbreaks.”1

Fact 2: CDC study found that 74% of cases were fully vaccinated.2

Fact 3: Harvard study found “no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated.”3

Fact 4:  There is no evidence from clinical trials that any of the vaccines prevent death because they did not have enough statistical power to measure the vaccine’s ability to prevent deaths.4-6 The FDA states, “A larger number of individuals at high risk of COVID-19 and higher attack rates would be needed to confirm efficacy of the vaccine against mortality.”4-6

Fact 5: CDC study observed that 100% of severe, critical, and fatal cases of COVID-19 occurred in vaccinated individuals.1

Fact 6:  CDC data show mass vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine has had no measurable impact on COVID-19 mortality in the U.S.7

Fact 7:  In the Pfizer clinical trial, there were zero cases of severe COVID-19 in children who did notreceive the vaccine. 8,9  In contrast, for children 5 years or older, the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial found that the vaccine causes severe (grade 3) systemic reactions that include fever greater than 102.1° F; vomiting that requires IV hydration; diarrhea of six or more loose stools in 24 hours; and severe fatigue, severe headache, severe muscle pain, or severe joint pain that prevents daily activity.9-12

Fact 8:  In the clinical trial, a range of 1 in 59 to 1 in 143 vaccinated children 5 to 11 years of age suffered severe systemic reactions within seven days of the second dose. There were 3 to 8 cases of severe systemic reactions observed in the vaccinated group for every 10 cases of non-severe COVID-19 in the unvaccinated group.9

Fact 9:  In the clinical trial, 1 in 9 vaccinated adolescents 12 to 15 years of age suffered severe systemic reactions within seven days of receiving the second dose. There were 7 times more severe systemic reactions observed in the vaccinated group than non-severe COVID-19 cases in the unvaccinated group.10-12

Fact 10:  The clinical trial also found that 1 in about 1,100 vaccinated children 12 to 15 years of age had a grade 4 systemic reaction (fever greater than 104° F) after the first dose that required an ER visit and withdrawal from the study.10,13

Fact 11: The Pfizer clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to show the vaccine is safe in children under 18 years of age, as the study did not include enough subjects to establish safety (i.e., the clinical trial only included about 2,600 vaccinated children aged 5 to 15).9,14 In comparison, it is known that COVID-19 fatalities are rare in children. As of Nov. 3, 2021, the chance of a child 17 years or younger contracting SARS-CoV-2 and dying from COVID-19 was 1 in 126,000 or 0.0008%.15

Fact 12: Because all subjects in clinical trials were observed for only two to six months, the long- term safety of COVID-19 vaccines for any age group is not known. Per the FDA, there are currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines in subpopulations such as pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals.4,8,16 Per Pfizer, the vaccine “has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility.”17

Fact 13: Safety surveillance reports have identified serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis in subjects under age 40, within seven days of vaccination. In boys aged 16 or 17, the FDA has reported an excess risk of myocarditis or pericarditis of 1 in 5,000 after the second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.18 And in boys aged 12 to 17, also after a second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, a Hong Kong study found an excess risk of myocarditis or pericarditis of 1 in 2,700.19

Fact 14:  The clinical trials detected that vaccine immunity wanes significantly over a short period of time. For example, the Pfizer vaccine efficacy decreased by 8% to 18% within only six months, and the J&J vaccine efficacy decreased by 25% to 29% within only six months.20,21 Additionally, the efficacy measured in the clinical trials was against the original Wuhan strain, not the new variants.

Fact 15:  In clinical trials, a third dose of Pfizer or Moderna vaccine or a second dose of Johnson & Johnson vaccine has not been evaluated for efficacy against disease, but rather antibody counts were observed in a small number of vaccinated subjects for only one month.18,21,22

Fact 16:  Treatments for COVID-19 have improved significantly since the pandemic began in early 2020, resulting in improved survival rates in hospitalized cases.23,24 Indeed, for people not living in a nursing home, the overall survival rate of COVID-19 is 99.8% in the U.S., and 99.999% for children specifically.25,26

Fact 17:  Hundreds of studies have observed the effectiveness of various treatments, the most studied being ivermectin, vitamin D, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and monoclonal antibodies.27-30 These treatments may also be beneficial for prophylaxis (i.e., pre-exposure or post-exposure prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 infections).31-35

Fact 18:  There is evidence that previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is more effective at preventing SARS- CoV-2 infection than COVID-19 vaccines. The J& Jvaccine clinical trial included over 2,000 subjects who had contracted SARS-CoV-2 before the study. The trial, which tested unvaccinated and vaccinated people uniformly, recorded the incidence of COVID-19 in that unvaccinated group at least 28 days after the vaccination of the other subjects in the study. The COVID-19 incidence of the unvaccinated group with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.1% (2/2,021), whereas the COVID-19 incidence of vaccinated subjects was 0.59% (113/19,306). These data suggest that there are 6 times more cases of COVID-19 in vaccinated subjects than in unvaccinated subjects previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.36

Fact 19: Data from the Johnson & Johnson clinical trial also indicate that an unvaccinated person previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 has a 99.9% chance of being protected from a repeat infection. Of note, as of July 1, 2021, there have been 177.4 million SARS-CoV-2 infections in the U.S., which is 53.8% of the U.S. population.26,36

Fact 20:  Infection and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 occur at high rates in fully vaccinated populations, and a significant proportion of severe, critical and fatal COVID-19 cases occur in fully vaccinated individuals. CDC data show mass vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine has had no measurable impact on COVID-19 mortality in the U.S. In addition, short-term clinical trial data indicate that 1 in 6 to 1 in 9 people 12–55 years of age who receive mRNA COVID-19 vaccines suffer severe (grade 3) systemic reactions, and long-term safety studies have not been conducted.13,37 Thus, the scientific data demonstrate that vaccine mandates have not been proven to create a safer environment.

Source

The Return of HIV?

**UPDATE April, 2022**

A Chinese gene-editing scientist was recently released from prison after being sentenced in 2019 for “illegally practicing medicine” as he altered the gene CCR5, which involved in HIV’s entrance into cells, in three embryos using CRISPR-Cas9 in an attempt to give the babies protection against HIV infection.

https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-return-of-hiv/  Video Here (Approx. 17 Min)

The Return of HIV?

The Highwire

Feb. 22, 2022

A new, highly virulent variant of HIV has suddenly popped up as the media is reporting everyone should be tested. Could there be a connection to Covid?  #HIVvariant #AIDSVaccine #HIV

  • In June, 2020, Nobel Prize Winner Dr Luc Montagnier stated COVID-19 has been manipulated and that components of HIV have been inserted into the viral sequence, perhaps in pursuit of an AIDS vaccine.  He stated:
    • SARS-CoV-2 appears to be a benign bat coronavirus modified to integrate spike proteins that allows the virus to enter human cells by attaching to ACE-2 receptors
    • The virus also appears to have been modified to integrate an envelope protein from HIV called GP141, which tends to impair the immune system. A third modification appears to involve nanotechnology, which allows the virus to remain airborne longer
  • Cellular and molecular microbiologist, Dr. Judy Mikoviz also believes COVID-19 is a product of human manipulation.  She states:
    • COVID-19 — the disease — is not caused by SARS-CoV-2 alone, but rather that it’s the result of a combination of SARS-CoV-2 and XMRVs (human gammaretroviruses)
    • SARS-CoV-2 also appears to have been manipulated to include components of HIV that destroys immune function along with XMRVs
    • Interestingly, both Dr. Birx and Dr. Redfield (head of CDC) are being investigated for research fraud regarding an AIDS vaccine.
  • In October, 2020 researchers warned that some COVID “vaccines” could increase risk of HIV infection. 
  • A 2009 study’s conclusion statedAd5-specific T cells demonstrate a phenotype and proliferative potential that would support HIV infection; these results are pertinent to the findings of the Step Study and future use of Ad5 as a vaccine vector.

Regarding antibody testing, hopefully COVID testing has revealed the glaring, numerable flaws, but if this is new to you, please see:

“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. ” Kary Mullis

For a brief, old interview with Mullis:  https://beforeitsnews.com/agenda-21/2020/12/kary-mullis-inventor-of-pcr-technique-about-science-fauci-and-their-agenda-engger-subtitles-  He’s obviously not a fan of Dr. Fauci.

If things were done right, “infection” would be a far cry from a positive PCR test.

“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it,” Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics told me. “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”

I asked Dr. Rasnick what advice he has for people who want to be tested for COVID-19.

“Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me,” he replies. “No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.”

Let’s review COVID testing:

Rephrased, the COVID test is a complete and utter flop which should demonstrate to all the CDC’s gross incompetence.

Lyme/MSIDS patients have struggled with the same testing issues for over 40 years with no signs of change.  Educate those around you on this pertinent fact.

CDC Withholding COVID Data & Public Health Agencies Skewing “Vaccine” Effectiveness Statistics

**UPDATE March 14, 2022**
  • Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on March 14 introduced a measure that would eliminate Dr. Anthony Fauci’s position.
  • Fauci has been director of NIAID, part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), since 1984.
  • Paul said the measure, proposed as an amendment to the government funding bill, is necessary because Fauci has become a “dictator-in-chief.”
 
**UPDATE March 6, 2022**

Withholding data is scientific fraud

Dr. Robert Malone states that COVID injections may increase the risk of Omicron infection.  Mrna vaccinologist Geert Vanden Bossche agrees, and also points out the importance of seizing this small window of opportunity to generate herd immunity in a natural way, using the Omicron variant as a kind of ‘life-attenuated vaccine’.  He sternly warns that if they “vaccinate” against Omicron, there will be severe disease in the “vaccinated.”
 

Facts Matter (Feb. 22): CDC Caught Hiding Troves of Data: Not Publishing Critical Hospitalization, Booster, and Virus Data

By Roman Balmakov

According to a bombshell report that came out of The New York Times, it turns out that the CDC has been withholding a large amount of data from the general public.

In fact, according to this report, the CDC has been collecting detailed information on COVID-19 hospitalizations for more than a year now, and this data breaks down the cases by age, by race, as well as by vaccination status. However, instead of releasing all of this information to the public, the CDC has instead been withholding most of it.

And what’s even more damning, is that it appears that the CDC was not keeping all of this information in a vault. Instead, they were selectively pushing out only the information that supported their messaging regarding boosters.

Resources:

🔵 Sekur (promo code: Roman)  https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul

🔵 CDC article:  https://ept.ms/3JKuMaq

🔵 Scotland  https://ept.ms/3HckZYU

🔵 CDC Mask Guidance:  https://ept.ms/34TXvuN, https://ept.ms/36ApUGH

🔵 Speech Standards: https://ept.ms/3sbqJ0Z, https://ept.ms/3LQCuSd

🔵 AAP study: https://ept.ms/3IdxrsV

http://  Approx. 1 Min

CDC Withholding Data

Feb. 20, 2022

https://anti5g.net/index.php/2022/02/21/report-cdc-has-withheld-covid-data-from-americans-to-prevent-vaccine-hesitency/

Report: CDC Has Withheld COVID Data From Americans To ‘Prevent Vaccine Hesitancy’

Feb. 21, 2022

The data are “not yet ready for prime time. “

The New York Times reported this past weekend that the CDC has chosen not to publish huge amounts of COVID data, instead keeping it secret, because it fears that the information would cause ‘vaccine hesitancy’ among the American public.

The report notes that the withheld data includes informative data on boosters, hospitalizations, wastewater analyses, as well as critical information on COVID infections and deaths broken down by age, race, and “vaccination” status.

The justification for holding the information back? Fears that the data would be “ misinterpreted” and lead to “ vaccine hesitancy, ” in line with the report.

Quite simply, it didn’t fit into the narrative that everyone must get vaccinated and boosted no matter who they are and what their situation is.  (See link for article)

________________

SUMMARY:

  • The data has been withheld for MORE THAN A YEAR.
  • Data has been collected since COVID shots were first rolled out and the agency is afraid it will be misinterpreted. 
  • CDC director, Dr. Walensky admits guidance has been based on PCR tests which produce over 90% false positives, as well as stay positive for up to 12 weeks after infection.
  • Guidance has also been based on what they felt people would accept.
  • She also admitted that over 75% of COVID deaths in the “vaccinated” were in people who had at least 4 comorbidities.  Dr. Martenson PhD, using the CDC’s own data, shows that just 0.9% of ALL deaths had no comorbidities.

http://

CDC Hides Data to “Avoid Hesitancy”

3/2/2022

Kim Iversen

_________________

https://www.theblaze.com/news/denominatorgate-how-public-health-agencies-are-skewing-the-statistics-on-vaccine-effectiveness

How prominent public health agencies are skewing vaccine effectiveness statistics in the US – #Denominatorgate

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC @CDCgov) and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC Health @NYCHealthy) are misleading us about the risk of being unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (CoV2).

They are doing this through two basic errors. First, they appear to be using outdated population estimates that grossly undercount the actual number of unvaccinated persons in the United States. This leads to artificially inflated estimates of COVID-19 case rates among the ever-shrinking unvaccinated population.

Second, they appear to be counting every person for whom they cannot verify vaccination status as an “unvaccinated person.” In many cases, it appears that it is taking health agencies weeks, if not months, to properly match COVID-19 hospitalizations with vaccination status, and we have no assurance that it is ever done properly at all. This has led to some jurisdictions quietly publishing significant corrections to their data weeks after initial publication — and after the media and public health officials have already run with the erroneous numbers. This is leading to both overstatement of the COVID-19 case rate for unvaccinated persons and understatement of the same rate for vaccinated persons. (See link for article)

________________

Important excerpts:

As NYC continues to shift unvaccinated COVID outcomes to the vaccinated side, these data will show less and less apparent vaccine efficacy, but no one will know unless this issue gets addressed not only in NYC but across the U.S.

By stacking the information deck against the public, the public health community and government are gambling with our lives. We deserve and should expect an honest accounting of COVID data devoid of bias and opacity. If truth and transparency are provided, the populace would trust these public institutions, which would lead to healthier outcomes for everyone.

__________________

**Comment**

Recently Dr. Vinay Prasad came out with a scathing video and article on “How the CDC Abandoned Science.” The information shared is important to know and understand; however, the CDC has been guilty of manipulating science and data for decades to suit their own purposes. One doctor has accused them of not even bothering to read the science. COVID has just made it more widely seen and experienced by the public. We need a complete overhaul of public health as these are captured agencies riddled with conflicts of interest. It’s so bad that a group within the agency called Spider has detailed the agency’s corruption.

For more:

Fired Pharmaceutical Workers Explain Why They Didn’t Get COVID Shots

https://www.theepochtimes.com/fired-pharmaceutical-workers-explain-why-they-didnt-get-covid-19-shots

Fired Pharmaceutical Workers Explain Why They Didn’t Get COVID-19 Shots

By Beth Brelje
February 3, 2022 
 

A major pharmaceutical company this week fired many employees who refused to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Syneos Health is a global pharmaceutical outsourcing company with some 28,000 employees in more than 110 countries. It contracts with bigger pharmaceutical companies including COVID-19 vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson/Janssen.

While J & J employs pharmaceutical representatives, it also contracts with Syneos Health to provide additional pharmaceutical representatives. Each Syneos representative is paired with one from J&J and they work together, selling drugs to doctors and other health care providers.

“It’s the same exact job, same exact customers, same exact expense reporting. Everything is the same, we’re just employed through different employers. And yet we’re being forced to be vaccinated and they’re not. We’re being told it’s because we can’t do our job, yet my Janssen counterpart can be unvaccinated, have an exemption, and still do the same exact job,” one sales representative told The Epoch Times.

(See link for article)

_____________________

**Comment**

This article perfectly exemplifies the randomness of “vaccine” mandates. They are not logical, scientific, or ethical in the least. Similar lunacy of wearing a mask all the way to the restaurant but removing it to eat (as if the virus understands this), these employees, doing the exact same work as their colleagues are forced to get the COVID jabs while their colleagues are exempt.

The employees, most with science or health backgrounds, attend a two-month pharmaceutical school when hired to learn the science behind the drugs they sell. They are foregoing the shots for the following reasons:

For more:

Biden Extends US National Emergency Over COVID-19

https://www.theepochtimes.com/biden-extends-us-national-emergency-over-covid-19

Biden Extends US National Emergency Over COVID-19

By Jack Phillips
February 20, 2022 Updated: February 20, 2022

President Joe Biden said the U.S. national emergency that was declared in early 2020 due to COVID-19 will be extended beyond March 1, citing what he called a “risk to the public health and safety.”

In a letter released on the White House website, Biden told House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that “there remains a need to continue this national emergency.” (See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • Biden’s move comes as many countries are dropping restrictions and several governors have removed mandates.  Many believe their actions are politically motivated with elections coming up.
  • This move also comes as a group of scientists and doctors are calling for immediate removal of all COVID restrictions as the ‘pandemic’ has reached the endemic stage.
  • Federal health officials admit Omicron cases are less severe and have dropped.
  • Bill Gates is on record admitting that Omicron infection is a “type of a vaccine” because once you are infected, it gives you cellular immunity which is more complete and spreads faster than man-made “vaccines,” allowing for herd immunity.
  • 70% of Americans agree with the statement: “It’s time we accept that COVID is here to stay and we just need to get on with our lives.”

I couldn’t agree more. While COVID is nasty for sure, there are many other things that demand attention.  They; however, don’t reap in billions for corrupt health ‘authorities’ and Big PharmaTake Lyme/MSIDS for instance.