Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

COVID Shot Impairs Semen Concentration & Total Motile Count. Also Causing Lactation Issues, Miscarriages, and Neonatal Death

While fact-checkers & corrupt public health ‘authorities,’ who aren’t even monitoring VAERS reports for safety signals, continue to dismiss and mock fertility concerns, the truth is eventually coming out.

Please watch this important 2 Min. video of highly experienced German pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt who shows that sperm is almost completely replaced by Spike Protein in the “vaccinated.”  

If I were a woman in fertile age, I would not plan a motherhood from a man who has been vaccinated’.” ~ Dr. Arne Burkhardt

And while the authors of the study qualify their findings with a positive spin by reporting that after five months sperm levels recover, others have pointed out the actual data do not support this and sperm levels actually continue to decline.

As Alex Berenson states, positive spin is now a commonplace tactic among researchers who are under overwhelming political pressure, but who discover issues which raise concerns about the shots. These researchers say one thing, but publish the data which shows another thing.

To downplay the unpleasant reality, the researchers focused on the fact that median rather than average counts did recover after five months, but by using the median rather than the average, it will hide extreme outliers such as men with near-zero sperm counts, which is more important than the median change.

____________________

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209

Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors

First published: 17 June 2022

CAPSULE: A retrospective longitudinal multicenter comparison reveals temporary sperm concentration reduction 3 months post BNT162b2 vaccination and later recovery. Semen volume and motility remain stable.

This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copy editing, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13209

Abstract

Background

The development of covid-19 vaccinations represents a notable scientific achievement. Nevertheless, concerns have been raised regarding their possible detrimental impact on male fertility

Objective

To investigate the effect of covid-19 BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine on semen parameters among semen donors (SD).

Methods

37 SD from three sperm banks that provided 220 samples, were included in that retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study. BNT162b2 vaccination included two doses, and vaccination completion was scheduled 7 days after the second dose. The study included four phases: T0 – pre-vaccination baseline control, which encompassed 1–2 initial samples per SD; T1, T2 and T3 – short, intermediate, and long terms evaluations, respectively. Each included 1–3 semen samples per donor provided 15–45, 75-120, and over 150 days after vaccination completion, respectively. The primary endpoints were semen parameters. Three statistical analyses were conducted: 1) generalized estimated equation model; 2) first sample and 3) samples’ mean of each donor per period were compared to T0.

Results

Repetitive measurements revealed −15.4% sperm concentration decrease on T2 (CI -25.5%–3.9%, p = 0.01) leading to total motile count 22.1% reduction (CI -35% – -6.6%, p = 0.007) compared to T0. Similarly, analysis of first semen sample only and samples’ mean per donor resulted in concentration and TMC reductions on T2 compared to T0 – median decline of 12 million/ml and 31 million motile spermatozoa, respectively (p = 0.02 and 0.002 respectively) on first sample evaluation and median decline of 9.5×106 and 27.3 million motile spermatozoa (p = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively) on samples’ mean examination. T3 evaluation demonstrated overall recovery. Semen volume and sperm motility were not impaired.

Discussion

This longitudinal study focused on SD demonstrates selective temporary sperm concentration and TMC deterioration three months after vaccination followed by later recovery verified by diverse statistical analyses.

Conclusions

Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC decline. Long-term prognosis remains good.

___________________

**Comment**

The results fall in line with the following:

https://rumble.com/v16wbg9-baby-die-off-lactation-issues-miscarriages-and-post-birth-death-dr.-naomi-w.html    Video Here (Approx. 2 Min)

Baby Die-Off: Lactation Issues, Miscarriages, and Neonatal Death

  • Babies who are nursing are getting sick from vaccinated mothers, and at least one has died.
  • Out of the 270 women who got pregnant in the Pfizer trials, 236 of the participants’ records disappeared, but out of the 34 women who remained, 28 of their babies died.
  • In Scotland, twice the number of babies died. In Ontario, Canada, 86 babies died (the average is five or six per year), and deaths among vaccinated mothers are up 34% in Israel.

“[This] should be making news; it’s the biggest news there is.” ~ Dr. Naomi Wolf

3000% Increase in Eye Disorders Following COVID Shots

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/almost-3000-increase-in-eye-disorders-following-covid-19-vaccines/

Almost 3,000% Increase in Eye Disorders Following COVID-19 Vaccines

7-Year-Old Girl Oozes Blood from Eye After Receiving Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine in Thailand. (Source.)

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

June 21, 2022

A case study was published earlier this month in the Journal Français d’Ophtalmologie reporting an anterior uveitis case that developed after the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine in a 54-year-old female.

Bilateral anterior uveitis after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine: Case report

A 54-year-old female patient, who did not have any disease other than diabetes mellitus, had complaints of redness, blurred vision, eye and headache that started in both eyes 3 days after the first dose of BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. Three days later, she was referred to our clinic.

She had the best corrected visual acuity of 5/20 on the snellen chart in both eyes. Conjunctiva of both eyes were hyperemic, corneal epithelial edema and keratic prepitates were observed in the lower quadrant. There was intense reaction in the anterior chamber and posterior synechia in the right eye. Intraocular pressure values were 60 mmHg in the right and 55 mmHg in the left with the Goldman applanation tonometer. Corneal edema was attributed to high intraocular pressure.

The patient was hospitalized and necessary blood tests were taken. (Full study.)

We have previously reported on a case of a 7-year-old girl in Thailand who began oozing blood from her eyes and skin after receiving the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. Her case was published in CTN News, which reported:

According to the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute MDPI, there have been recent reports of hemorrhage, blood clots, and thrombocytopenia following the administration of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines that have raised concerns over the safety of genetic vaccines for people with pre-existing coagulation disorders or those on certain medications. (Full article.)

With the dangerous COVID-19 mRNA shots now being extended to babies and toddlers, I decided to search the Government VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Reporting System) database for cases filed for various eye disorders. The list of eye disorders that I searched can be seen here. They are:

  • Abnormal sensation in eye
  • Abscess of eyelid
  • Autoimmune eye disorder
  • Binocular eye movement disorder
  • Decreased eye contact
  • Eye allergy
  • Eye contusion
  • Eye discharge
  • Eye disorder
  • Eye haemangioma
  • Eye haematoma
  • Eye haemorrhage
  • Eye infection
  • Eye infection bacterial
  • Eye infection fungal
  • Eye infection intraocular
  • Eye infection staphylococcal
  • Eye infection toxoplasmal
  • Eye infection viral
  • Eye inflammation
  • Eye injury
  • Eye irritation
  • Eyelid abrasion
  • Eyelid bleeding
  • Eyelid boil
  • Eyelid contusion
  • Eyelid cyst
  • Eyelid disorder
  • Eyelid function disorder
  • Eyelid haematoma
  • Eyelid infection
  • Eyelid injury
  • Eyelid irritation
  • Eyelid margin crusting
  • Eyelid pain
  • Eyelid tumour
  • Eyelid vascular disorder
  • Eye movement disorder
  • Eye pain
  • Eye pruritus
  • Eye rolling
  • Eyes sunken
  • Eye swelling
  • Eye ulcer
  • Floppy eyelid syndrome
  • Glassy eyes

For the past 18 months since the COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorizations, there have been 17,858 cases of eye disorders reported, including 59 deaths, 1,232 permanent disabilities, 2,882 ER visits, and 1,466 hospitalizations, with 307 life threatening events. (Source.)

That’s an average of 992 cases of eye disorders reported each month following COVID-19 vaccine injections, and this is most certainly NOT an exhaustive list of eye disorders.

But it does give us a sub-set of data to compare to all other FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30 years (360 months) prior to the roll out of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Using this exact same set of eye disorders, we find 11,898 cases filed for eye disorders over the course of 30 years following all other FDA-approved vaccines, which averages out to 33 cases a month. (Source.)

So that is a 2,902% increase in eye disorders following the very dangerous COVID-19 vaccines, which the health “authorities” now want parents to inject into their babies.

__________________

**Comment**

Oozing blood after these shots is also documented here, and German physicians showed alarming footage and slides of multiple vaxxed patients’ blood after the shots.  Also, listen to an important podcast where Dr. Jane Ruby explains embalmers are finding white, fibrous substances in the vasculature of the vaxxed.  Scroll to 9:00 to listen and see pictures.

Way back in 2020 I posted a video of Italian pathologists who performed more than 50 autopsies and who explain COVID patients are not dying from interstitial pneumonia (why ventilators don’t work and actually do more harm) but from DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) a medical term for blood clotting causing lack of oxygen. Chinese researchers performed 74 autopsies and confirmed this.  Interestingly, Dr. Fauci told the government, “Don’t do autopsies,” so little has been studied and revealed in the U.S.  This article explains how a German pathologist who stated that 30-40% of vaxxed autopsies died from the ‘vaccine’ went oddly silent and suddenly stopped doing autopsies.

Autopsies are key for discovery.

“You can not find that for which you do not look.” ~ Dr. Ryan Cole

The Italian pathologists state in the video:

SARS, COVID2 was invented in a British lab (Pirbright Institute) from a U.S. patent(Bickerton et al.) which has 4 genetic inserts:
  • HIV
  • Malaria
  • TB
  • most likely Dengue or Zika, which most likely were carried out in the biosafety lab in Wuhan China, and then escaped or were released.

Of these diseases Malaria, Dengue, Zika, and HIV can cause Thrombocytopenia, which means decreased platelets and formation of micro clots or thrombus, which produces purpuric lesions on the skin, which results in red dots on the limbs, that have been reported in some patients asymptomatic but infected with COVID-19 – mainly in young people, and the worst cases are capable of inducing coagulation, Disseminated Intravascular, which is a systemic event triggered by damage in the blood vessels, caused by inflammation.This has two consequences:

  • Severe, localized micro thrombus formation OR
  • Generalized or localized bleeding

Dr. Hoffe used D-dimer tests on his vaxxed patients complaining of breathlessness, and found that 62% showed microscopic blood clots, with capillaries plugging up which will eventually lead to a serous cardiovascular event.  This also helps explain why embalmers are now finding arteries filled with blood clots, why many are needing leg amputations after the shots, and how Chinese cupping on those who got the shots shows blood like jelly.  Within this article is a video showing pictures from embalmers of “biostructures” within the vaxxed vascular systems. Evidently these are not clots but appear to be some sort of organic crystals and extremely thin wires.

These blood clots are found mainly in the lungs, heart, brain and kidney. It is feasible that many died of hemorrhagic vascular brain ischemia, others with kidney failure, and others with heart disease such as myocardial infarction or failure of cardiac dilation of the heart.

This also explains why hydroxychlorquine (HCQ), an antimalarial (along with zinc)is working, as well as Azithromycin as it stops the growth of bacteria like TB.  HCQ also prevents the virus from binding to hemoglobin.
Dr. Haridopolos (FL Board of Medicine) states the following about hydroxychloroquine:
  • alkalizes the blood, reducing the virus’ ability to replicate
  • causes 02 to dissociate from hemoglobin, similarly as carbon monoxide replaces the 02 molecule
  • reduces cytokine storm

 

This article explains how the shots cause thrombocytopenia (low platelets) caused by antibodies against the toxic spike protein, resulting in depletion of platelets which can lead to DIC which eventually exhausts the coagulation system which will result in hemorrhaging, and explains why people are bleeding out their eyes, nose, skin, etc. This article reveals there is graphene hydroxide (extremely sharp carbon molecule which is not found in nature and is NOT biodegradable and stays in the body) in the injections which act as nano-razors and cut the epithelial lining of recipients’ veins. This too can exhaust the coagulation system.

Twelve scientists wrote about this to EU regulators in March 2021, asking them to address these safety concerns or halt the ‘vaccines.’ Crickets.

But, you are soundly warned.

 

CDC Admits It Never Monitored VAERS For COVID “Vaccine” Safety Signals & Pfizer Classified Nearly All Adverse Reactions as ‘Not Related’ to Shots

For a refresher on the mounting list of adverse reactions and deaths reported after COVID shots see:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-vaers-covid-vaccine-safety

CDC Admits It Never Monitored VAERS for COVID Vaccine Safety Signals

In response to a Freedom of Information Request submitted by Children’s Health Defense, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week admitted it never analyzed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines.

In a stunning development, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) last week admitted — despite assurances to the contrary — the agency never analyzed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines.

The admission was revealed in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

In September 2021, I published an article in The Defender in which I used the CDC’s published methodology to analyze VAERS for safety signals from COVID-19 vaccines.

The signals were loud and clear, leading me to wonder “why is nobody listening?”

Instead, I should have asked, “Is anybody even looking for them?”

After that article was published, I urged CHD’s legal team to submit a FOIA request to the CDC about its VAERS monitoring activities.

Since CDC officials stated publicly that “COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring is the most robust in U.S. history,” I had assumed that at the very least, CDC officials were monitoring VAERS using the methods they described in a briefing document posted on the CDC website in January 2021 (and updated in February 2022, with minor changes).

I was wrong.

The lynchpin of their safety monitoring was to mine VAERS data for safety signals by calculating what are known as proportional reporting ratios (PRR’s).

This is a method of comparing the proportion of different types of adverse events reported for a new vaccine to the proportion of those events reported for an older, established vaccine.

If the new vaccine shows a significantly higher reporting rate of a particular adverse event relative to the old one, it counts as a safety signal that should then trigger a more thorough investigation.

The briefing document states, “CDC will perform PRR data mining on a weekly basis or as needed.”

proportional reporting ratio prr

And yet, in the agency’s response to the FOIA request, it wrote that “no PRRs were conducted by CDC. Furthermore, data mining is outside of the agency’s purview.”

The agency suggested contacting the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which was supposed to perform a different type of data mining, according to the briefing document.

cdc chd letter

CDC officials repeatedly claimed they have not seen safety signals in VAERS.

signal assessmentFor example, on April 27, 2021, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky stated the CDC did not see any signals related to heart inflammation.

But a PRR calculation I did using the number of myo/pericarditis reports listed in the first table produced by the CDC obtained via the FOIA request reveals clear and unambiguous safety signals relative to the comparator vaccines mentioned in the briefing document (i.e., flu vaccines, FLUAD and Shingrix).

The table is dated April 2, 2021, almost four weeks before she made those remarks.

In fact, among the 15 adverse events for adults included in that week’s tabulations, PRRs I calculated also show loud-and-clear safety signals for acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, appendicitis, Bell’s palsy, coagulopathy, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A), stroke and death.

The actual monitoring the CDC did diverges from the one promised in the briefing document in other ways.

For example, the CDC never created tables of the top 25 adverse events reported in the previous week, tables comparing different vaccine manufacturers, or tables of auto-immune diseases.

And it only began monitoring in early April 2021, even though reports from COVID-19 vaccines had been flooding VAERS since mid-December of the previous year.

To be clear, VAERS is not the only database the CDC uses to monitor COVID-19 vaccine safety.

For example, the CDC sponsored several studies of COVID-19 safety using the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), which is comprised of millions of medical records from HMO’s across several states.

Those studies do not raise many safety concerns. However, they make many questionable methodological choices.

To give one example, a major safety study based on VSD data published in September 2021, in “JAMA,” compares adverse event rates that occur within 1-21 days of vaccination to the rate of occurrence from 22 to 42 days after vaccination.

It makes no comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, or before vaccination versus after in the same individuals.

Moreover, the VSD is far from infallible, having failed initially to detect the increase in myocarditis rates.

In contrast, although calculating PRR’s is a blunt pharmacovigilance tool and far from perfect, it nevertheless has the advantage of being straightforward and difficult to manipulate with statistical sleight of hand.

PRRs are one of the oldest, most basic and most well-established tools of pharmacovigilance. The calculations are so straightforward that the CDC automated it several years ago, so it could have been done at the press of a button.

It simply beggars belief that the CDC failed to do this simple calculation. Even now, a paper published by CDC staff in March on the safety of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines remains purely descriptive with no PRR calculation.

Meanwhile, a study published by a researcher not affiliated with the CDC in February in “Frontiers in Public Health” analyzes VAERS and EudraVigilance data using a method similar to PRRs, revealing clear and concerning safety signals.

And while it is true that VAERS is not the only database the CDC can use to monitor COVID-19 vaccine safety, it is of critical importance because it can reveal signals much faster than any other method — if anybody cares to look for them.

It remains to be seen if the FDA was properly monitoring VAERS. That will be the subject of a future FOIA request.

But even if it was, it doesn’t change the fact that the CDC completely failed in its promise to monitor VAERS for safety signals.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

___________________

**Comment**

Yet another reason not to trust the CDC, besides the fact it’s deleting VAERS reports.

___________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-trials-adverse-events-shots-fda-eua-documents

Pfizer Classified Almost All Severe Adverse Events During COVID Vaccine Trials ‘Not Related to Shots’

The case reports included in Pfizer clinical trial documents, released June 1 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, reveal a trend of classifying almost all adverse events — and in particular severe adverse events — as being “not related” to the vaccine.

The latest release by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine documents reveals numerous instances of participants who sustained severe adverse events during Phase 3 trials. Some of these participants withdrew from the trials, some were dropped and some died.  (See link for article)

___________________

A few examples of deaths & severe reactions in the Pfizer trials that were classified as “not related” to the ‘vaccine’:

  • Female in her 50’s, died of myocardial infarction
  • Female in her 50’s died of cardiac arrest
  • A male in his mid-60’s died of myocardial infarction
  • A teen, female was diagnosed with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis which was ongoing as of March, 2021
  • Male in mid-70’s diagnosed with COVID, abdominal adhesions, altered mental status, acute hypoxic respiratory failure and required hospitalization.  He also had congestive heart failure after shot
  • Male in mid-70’s got pneumonia and peripheral edema and was hospitalized
  • Male in early 40’s got chronic myelogenous leukemia and was ongoing as of March, 2021
  • Female in her mid-40s diagnosed with kidney stones requiring hospitalization. Also diagnosed with COVID
  • Female in her late 50s suffered acute exacerbation of asthma requiring hospitalization and had a blood pressure of 183/130 and a heart rate of 98 beats per minute
  • Male in his late 20s sustained a bilateral pulmonary embolism requiring hospitalization with symptoms ongoing as of March, 2021
Many serious adverse events and deaths were listed in a separate, massive document, exceeding 2,500 pages.

Not ONE of the events, classified as toxicity level 4the highest and most serious level, were classified as being related to “vaccination.”

Level 4 events listed in the document include but are not limited to the following, many of which occurred in multiple patients:

  • Acute cholecystitis
  • Acute respiratory failure
  • Adrenal carcinoma
  • Anaphylactic shock
  • Aortic valve incompetence
  • Appendicitis
  • Arrhythmia, supraventricular
  • Arteriosclerosis
  • Brain abscess
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Chronic myeloid leukemia
  • Complicated appendicitis/acute appendicitis with necrosis
  • Congenital heart disease/heart anomaly
  • Coronary artery occlusion
  • COVID-19 illness
  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • Diverticulitis
  • Hemiplegic migraine
  • Hemorrhagic stroke
  • Interstitial lung disease
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Orthostatic hypotension/possible postural hypotension
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Pericolic abscess
  • Peritoneal abscess
  • Renal colic
  • Ruptured diverticulum
  • Small bowel obstruction/small intestinal obstruction
  • Spontaneous coronary artery dissection
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Suicidal ideation (and suicidal ideation with attempt)
  • Syncope
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Worsening of abdominal pain
  • An “unevaluable event/“unknown of unknown origin”

Only a small number of toxicity level 3 adverse events were indicated as having been “related” to vaccination. Such adverse events included but are not limited to the following, some of which occurred in multiple trial participants:

  • Arthralgia
  • Blood glucose increase/glucose spike
  • Deafness/hearing loss
  • Dyspepsia
  • Hypotension
  • Lymph node pain
  • Lymphadenopathy/lymph node swelling
  • Musculoskeletal chest pain (non-cardiac)
  • Neutropenia
  • Pain in fingers/bilateral hands
  • Pruritus
  • Pyrexia/febrile syndrome
  • Severe headache
  • Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
  • Sleep disorder/sleep disturbance
  • Tachycardia
  • Urticaria
  • Ventricular arrhythmia
  • Vertigo

The other little dirty secret are the patients who discontinued the trial due to the following adverse events which was released in an additional document.  

  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Amnesia
  • Anorexia
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Cerebral infarction
  • Congestive cardiac failure
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Deafness (unilateral)
  • Depression
  • Diabetic foot
  • Diverticular perforation
  • Exposure during pregnancy
  • Eye pain
  • Gait instability
  • Gastric adenocarcinoma
  • Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
  • Hypertension
  • Irregular heart rate
  • Loss of taste and smell
  • Myalgia
  • Paraparesis
  • Parkinsonism
  • Presyncope
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Pyrexia
  • Swelling face
  • Tachycardia
  • Transient ischaemic attack
  • Urticaria
  • Vaccine allergy
  • Vertigo

Lastly, a federal judge found the Pfizer-BioNTech and Pfizer Comirnaty vaccines are legally distinct.

This document states that trial participants were administered one of two candidate vaccines, labeled BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 (the latter of which ultimately received an EUA from the FDA), or a placebo. A variety of dosage levels were also tested, ranging from 10 μg to 100 μg for BNT162b1, and 10 μg to 30 μg for BNT162b2.

In Phase 1 of Study BNT162-01, the clinical review reports that “40% to 45% of participants who received BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 across age groups and across dose levels reported one or more AEs [adverse events] from Dose 1 through 28 days (i.e., 1 month) after Dose 2.”

In what will turn out to be a general pattern throughout the clinical review, we are told that “most AEs were considered by the investigator as not related to study intervention and mild to moderate in severity, and all AEs were reported as resolved.”

Please read the entire article for yourself to discover the unethical and fraudulent way these trials are run, and that despite the incidence of severe adverse events including death, Pfizer concluded the shots were ‘safe and well-tolerated.’

Monkeypox Treatments & Vaccines Shipped to 8 States Requesting Them Despite Experts Warning Vaccines Could Cause a Global Outbreak

https://www.axios.com/2022/06/03/monkeypox-vaccine-treatments

Monkeypox treatments and vaccines shipped to states as U.S. cases rise

June 3, 2022

Herb Scribner

Excerpts:

The U.S. government is shipping drugs and vaccines to combat the monkeypox virus to eight states that have requested them, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials said in a briefing Friday.

Driving the news: There have been at least 20 cases of monkeypox in the United States across 11 states, and those numbers are expected to rise, the CDC said.

  • States have received the Jynneos vaccine, which is given to prevent monkeypox and smallpox.
  • Officials said one state asked for the ACAM2000 vaccine, which is distributed post-exposure. (This is an older generation vaccine that comes with significant side-effects including myocarditis and pericarditis in 1 in 175 adults. Please also note these are side-effects caused by the COVID injections as well.)
    • Serious health problems, including those that are life-threatening, can also occur in unvaccinated people who are accidentally infected by someone who has recently received the vaccine. In particular, unvaccinated people who are pregnant, or have problems with their heart or immune system, or have skin problems like eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis, and have close contact with a vaccine recipient are at an increased risk for serious problems if they become infected with the vaccine virus, either by being vaccinated, or by being in close contact with a person who was vaccinated. It is very important for the ACAM2000 recipient to properly care for the vaccination site to prevent the virus in the vaccine from spreading and infecting another part of the body and other people.

___________________

**Comment**

I read the story twice and could not find the “drugs” or “treatments” mentioned but only “vaccines,” the new supposed magic bullet cure for all disease being peddled by our government:

  • that has a cozy relationship with Sanofi, the patent holder of ACAM2000 and who also just happens to be one of the companies selected for Operation Warp Speed that supplies the U.S. government with COVID shots and who received $2.1 BILLION for development.
  • that conveniently gave $44 MILLION in 2019 to Bavarian Nordic, the company the Jynneos vaccine has been a part of since 2021, and who has a “long-standing collaboration with the U.S. government.”  Additional options on the contract are valued at $180 MILLION.

Many are even questioning whether this is truly monkeypox or in fact shingles which is a known side-effect of the COVID “vaccines” and the fact there’s been a sudden 5,000% increase in shingles which can hardly be coincidental. 

____________________

https://palexander.substack.com/p/smallpox-vaccine-to-prevent-monkey?

Smallpox vaccine to prevent monkeypox (MONEYpox) could cause global smallpox (vaccinia) epidemic; I warn, don’t be stupid, understand you have damaged immune systems of (b)illions with COVID vaccines

Experts are saying smallpox vax 85% effective in monkey pox; this is NOT good news, for millions/billions are now immunocompromised from COVID vax; CDC sounds alarm for gay-bisexual men

Important excerpts:

COVID vaccinated persons have depressed subverted immune systems (documented) and thus are at risk for latent and existing pathogen (and cancers), that would not have infected them prior. Very valid to conjecture on this that it is the COVID vaccine and what it has done immune system wise, that has caused monkey pox to emerge in Europe and North America. COVID vaccinated persons could be at dramatic risk to monkeypox and a host of other pathogen/virus.

Next, it is true that persons under 40 years old do not have the smallpox vaccine (a vaccine that has had a questionable history as to safety), yet the real issue is the catastrophic outcome should we vaccinate millions and millions with smallpox vaccine who have subverted immune systems now due the the sub-optimal non-sterilizing COVID vaccine. I warn, by taking people who have compromised immunity as are COVID vaccinated persons (e.g. increased risk of infection and are getting infected post vaccine), and as such immunocompromised, and you give them the smallpox vaccine for monkeypox (orthopoxvirus) prevention, you could create devastation.

The smallpox vaccine can potentially then drive cases of smallpox as well as vaccinia in subverted immunity, immunocompromised COVID vaccinated persons, including among young people and children. This is at present a theoretical risk, but can become a reality if how I explained it above is so.

Powassan Virus Found in Massachusetts Ticks

https://www.westernmassnews.com/2022/06/10/powassan-virus-found-massachusetts-ticks/  News Story Here (Approx. 3 Min)

Updated: Jun. 10, 2022 at 4:00 PM CDT

AMHERST, MA (WGGB/WSHM) – A western Massachusetts tick testing company has found several ticks have tested positive for the Powassan virus, not long after a Connecticut woman in her 90s died of the tick-borne virus.

Scientists at Tick Report in Amherst are busy testing around 1,000 ticks a week, taking a close look under the microscope, and extracting DNA.

“June is going to be the worst month of the year for deer ticks, really the riskiest tick bite that you can get,” said Paul Killinger, education director at Tick Report.

(See link for news story)
____________________
**Comment**
I just found a juvenile black legged tick on my towel, on my deck approx. 6 feet away from trees but separated by much and rocks.
One minute, no tick, and the next minute there it was.
I believe the tick blew from the nearby trees onto the deck, even though most researchers deny ticks dropping from trees, even though birds transport ticks everywhere, including trees where they may drop off.
This TV anchor got infected this way, and a Lyme advocate told me that ticks blow into their pool from nearby trees regularly.
For more:

Powassan is NOT rare:

For the last two years, Coppe Laboratories has dedicated a significant amount of time and resources to dispelling the myth that infection with Powassan virus, a virus transmitted by tick bite, is rare. The Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) reports only 100 cases of Powassan virus infection in the United States in the last 10 years. Indeed, that statistic gives the illusion that Powassan infection is rare. However, did you know that the only infections reported to CDC are those that are life-threatening, particularly cases causing severe inflammation of the brain like the case reported in LiveScienceCoppe has published three new papers in the last year that clearly show Powassan virus infection is not rare are at all, and until testing for this virus is included as part of tick-borne disease screening panels infections will continue to be underreported. Coppe’s Powassan Guide, which can be downloaded from the website, summarizes the findings from both tick and human Powassan prevalence studies, as well as defining the patient populations that would benefit most from Powassan testing.