Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Why is the FDA Attacking a Safe, Effective Drug?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fda-ivermectin-covid-19-coronavirus-masks-anti-science-

Why Is the FDA Attacking a Safe, Effective Drug?

Ivermectin is a promising Covid treatment and prophylaxis, but the agency is denigrating it
By David R. Henderson and Charles L. Hooper

The Food and Drug Administration claims to follow the science. So why is it attacking ivermectin, a medication it certified in 1996?

Earlier this year the agency put out a special warning that “you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19.” The FDA’s statement included words and phrases such as “serious harm,” “hospitalized,” “dangerous,” “very dangerous,” “seizures,” “coma and even death” and “highly toxic.” Any reader would think the FDA was warning against poison pills. In fact, the drug is FDA-approved as a safe and effective antiparasitic.

Ivermectin was developed and marketed by Merck & Co. while one of us (Mr. Hooper) worked there years ago. William C. Campbell and Satoshi Omura won the 2015 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for discovering and developing avermectin, which Mr. Campbell and associates modified to create ivermectin.

Ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines. Merck has donated four billion doses to prevent river blindness and other diseases in Africa and other places where parasites are common. A group of 10 doctors who call themselves the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance have said ivermectin is “one of the safest, low-cost, and widely available drugs in the history of medicine.”

Ivermectin fights 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19. A single dose reduced the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in cells by 99.8% in 24 hours and 99.98% in 48 hours, according to a June 2020 study published in the journal Antiviral Research.  (See link for article)

_____________________

**Comment**

**UPDATE, Aug. 27, 2021**

The spin-doctors recently put out this hit-piece against Ivermectin, a safe, cheap, effective treatment for COVID. The author manipulates the fact there are some desperate self-treating people who are experiencing poisoning due to taking the animal form of ivermectin because mainstream medicine has shunned it. The hit-piece and the CDC uses this unfortunate event to recommend that “instead of prescribing ivermectin, physicians should urge patients to get ‘vaccinated’ against COVID,” use masks, social distance, and wash hands.” Federal agencies have launched an offensive against ivermectin prescribing this week, with the FDA issued a consumer warning about ivermectin. The agency made a splash with a humorous tweet about the warning, stating, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

Our corrupt public health ‘authorities’ would rather blame desperate patients than prescribe medicine that would save lives.  

If you are a Lyme/MSIDS patient, you quickly learn that those entrusted with public health are charlatans who are far more interested in power and money than in guiding the public to better health.  Patients suffering from tick-borne illness are kicked to the curb and told to “go home and be well,” while smug conflict-riddled authorities have patents on virtually every aspect of the disease.  Similarly to COVID, they rig testing for a pre-determined outcome that suits their vested interests.  These ‘authorities’ have been virtually wrong about every single issue.

In the case of Ivermectin, a drug previously considered an “essential medicine” that is safe and effective, it is now dangerous, toxic, and harmful for COVID.  Why the about-face? 

And why are they ignoring natural immunity which seemingly lasts for years if not a life-time?

Three words: conflicts of interest.

The international group of doctors called “Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance” or FLACCC searched for cheap drugs that could be repurposed for COVID and found Ivermectin fit the bill perfectly. They have created protocols for every stage of the illness which have saved countless lives, yet are still being highly maligned and censored, with regular hit-pieces against them by corrupt medical journals. Now courts are having to order hospitals to give these treatments to save lives.  You will not hear about these success stories from the media.

Interestingly, when I posted Dr. Kory, a member of the group, speaking at the Senate hearing on the effectiveness of Ivermectin on COVID and his frustration with all of the information being censored, I had to go back and put in a pdf of the transcript as Youtube censored the Senate hearing!

This censoring madness has hit a new low, as doctors are now being threatened by The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) that doctors and health professionals could be at risk of losing their medical licenses if they spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on social media, online and in the media.  Excerpt:

“They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health.”

Hopefully it isn’t hard to ascertain that “consensus-driven” are the key words here.

Lyme/MSIDS has a long, dark history where nearly nothing about it is accepted and agreed upon. There is no consensus when it comes to tick-borne illness and the topic is still – 40 years after discovery – hotly debated leaving many doctors too afraid to treat it. Those that do are in the cross-hairs of public health authorities and are bullied, threatened, monitored, fined, and have their licenses restricted or revoked.

Remember when the consensus for COVID was to put everyone under medically-induced comas with ventilators and it killed some 85 percent of patients who received the “treatment”?  I personally know of a man who was only offered that specific treatment at a local hospital. Thankfully, he declined and lived to tell the tale.  Was he offered HCQ or Ivermectin or even IV vitamin C?  Nope, because those treatments aren’t “consensus-driven,” or peddled by our corrupt public health authorities who stand to gain a lot of money by continuing to push the fear narrative.

These ‘authorities’ have done all in their power to inflate case numbers with a faulty, worthless test which is designed to be positive, and inflate the death count to perpetuate fear so everyone believes their only recourse is to take their lucrative, fast-tracked, experimental mRNA injection that isn’t approved, hasn’t gone through extensive safety testing, isn’t even a vaccine, that is causing microscopic blood clotting, and is allowing a toxic spike protein which has been labeled a “bioweapon” to go systemically into the body where it is accumulating in tissues and organs, crossing the blood, brain barrier – and is associated with Parkinson’s and Prion diseases. 

An entire group of doctors have written a paper on how these experimental injections are “needless, ineffective, and dangerous,” on the healthy and sick alike.

Hardly sounds like“consensus” to me.

Yet, observe which side gets air-play with the bought-out media, which has already attacked doctors daring to speak against the “consensual” accepted narrative.

Hint: it won’t be for doctors who only stand to lose their jobs.

Category:

Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Renowned German Pathologist Urges More Autopsies of Vaccinated People Due to High Rate of Vaccine-Related Deaths

https://thenewamerican.com/renowned-german-pathologist-urges-more-autopsies-of-vaccinated-people-due-to-high-rate-of-vaccine-related-deaths/

Renowned German Pathologist Urges More Autopsies of Vaccinated People Due to High Rate of Vaccine-related Deaths

 by Veronika Kyrylenko 
Renowned German Pathologist Urges More Autopsies of Vaccinated People Due to High Rate of Vaccine-related Deaths
fstop123/iStock/Getty Images Plus
A renowned German pathologist has sounded the alarm on the number of fatal consequences of COVID-19 vaccinations being drastically underestimated, according to his findings.

Peter Schirmacher, the director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, who was admired by The Pathologist magazine as one of the world’s 100 most influential professionals in the field, stated that 30 to 40 percent of people who died within two weeks after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine and whom he performed an autopsy on died from the vaccination, according to the local outlet Augsburger Allgemeine.

The pathologist argues that just like cadavers of people who died from COVID-19, corpses of people who die within the short period of time after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine should be examined more frequently and meticulously. He added that currently, pathologists do not study possible connections between inoculation and a development of deadly health implications such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases. Since vaccinated people usually do not die under clinical observation, Schirmacher explains, “The doctor examining the corpse does not establish a context with the vaccination and certifies a natural death and the patient is buried. Or he certifies an unclear type of death, and the public prosecutor sees no third-party fault and releases the corpse for burial.”  (See link for article)

___________________

**Comment**

The administration of German Chancellor Angela Merkel rejected Schirmacher’s conclusions and declined his calls, stating that “vaccines are safe”. And the German medical regulatory body announced the Schirmacher’s statements are “incomprehensible.”  

In other words, nothing to see here.

The Federal Association of German Pathologists, also urging more autopsies of the vaccinated, requested the Health Minister to promote the practice back in March, but the lack of response demonstrates that authorities are pursing goals that have little connection with science or healthcare.

Other doctors are asking for autopsies of the “vaccinated” and that a report of just one autopsy after just one dose of the Pfizer shot, showed almost all tissues tested positive on PCR for SARS-CoV-2. The doctor also points out that a 45-year-old mother just died of heart issues and brain swelling, shortly after getting the COVID shot required before she could begin her job at Johns Hopkins University. There will be tears and flowers, but probably no autopsy – and no pause in the shots demanded for mothers and potential mothers if they want to work at JHU.

The ramifications of these injections can not be overstated.

The article also points out that the underreporting of vaccine-related deaths and adverse effects are also a problem in the U.S. and a lawsuit is currently in play due to a CDC whistleblower’s testimony that there are at least 45,000 deaths related to the COVID injections and that the CDC is under-reporting such deaths by a conservative factor of at least five.

According to Dr. Peter McCullough, since typically only 10 percent of vaccine-injury cases make it to VAERS, the death toll from the vaccines may actually be 10-fold higher than the official number. He also said a vaccine that leads to 150 deaths is usually withdrawn from use.  He feels the injections would have been shut down in February if there was a data and safety monitoring board.

For a little history lesson, the Swine Flu vaccine was dumped after 4,000 reported adverse events. Nine states suspended it two weeks after it began, after only 3 deaths in the elderly that weren’t even proven to be caused by the vaccine.

The reason for this is simple: it happened before vaccine manufacturers got a free pass.

According to 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22, “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.” Source

Also important to understand is how these “vaccine” manufacturers, besides having complete indemnity, are demanding that countries put up sovereign assets, including bank reserves, military bases & embassy buildings as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits.

http://

New Delhi-based World Is One News (WION) reported in February 2021 that Brazil rejected Pfizer’s demands, calling them “abusive.” The demands included that Brazil:27

  1. “Waives sovereignty of its assets abroad in favor of Pfizer”
  2. Not apply its domestic laws to the company
  3. Not penalize Pfizer for vaccine delivery delays
  4. Exempt Pfizer from all civil liability for side effects

More on Pfizer:

THE PFIZER MRNA VACCINE CLINICAL TRIAL STUDY DESIGN WARNS AGAINST PROXIMITY (SHARED AIR INHALATION OR SKIN CONTACT) BETWEEN VACCINE PARTICIPANTS AND THE UNVACCINATED AS A POSSIBLE VECTOR OF HARM

Lastly, the Centers for Disease Control is openly discussing internment camps for individuals with a high risk of contracting COVID. CDC’s euphemism for the internment is “shielding.” 

Although a document at the CDC website appears to refer to settings outside the United States, the suggestion that governments should erect safe zones to quarantine healthy but at-risk people should alarm Americans already faced with mask and vaccine mandates.

All this for a supposed “virus” that has not been isolated and proven to cause disease.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Who Watches the Watchmen?

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/who-watches-the-watchmen-faucis-noble-lie-exposed?

Who watches the watchmen? Fauci’s ‘noble lie,’ exposed

July 29, 2021CHARLES RIXEY

The philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer once wrote that truth goes through three stages:

First, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently opposed; and third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Guess what’s next for us?

*****

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? — Who watches the watchers?

Six months ago, I began my first article on scientific censorship during COVID-19 by introducing Dr. Anthony Fauci as a surprise character who had emerged unexpectedly while I dug through what were then 83,000 FOIA emails, published by US Right-to-Know over the course of the last year: see files related to Ralph Baric, Linda Saif, Rita Colwell, Colorado State/Rocky Mountain National Laboratory and the NCBI; other FOIA releases from Judicial Watch, BuzzFeed, and the Washington Post include NIH funding of the WIV and Dr. Fauci’s emails.

I’ve been trying for quite some time to get people to understand the full scope of the Dr. Fauci “situation,” but it’s clear that segments of our national leadership are preventing an honest and open inquiry into his actions because they fear the backlash or collateral damage that will result from the tarnishing of their sacred cow. It’s time Americans were told the truth: that the grant money sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) is merely a footnote in this narrative. After all, Dr. Fauci controls nearly $4 billion of annual grant funding for the NIAID, the institute within the NIH he has directed since 1984. Over 37 years, more than 50,000 research projects have been supported with more than $50 billion (conservatively) of taxpayer funds that have been doled out to them.  (See link for article)

**Comment**
This article has it all and is a “must read”.
The author created a COVID-19 website to speak to a broader audience to offer unfiltered information as he realizes COVID has been intensely politicalized, and that mainstream media has failed when they were needed most.

He also points out that Fauci:

  1. and the NIH are behind research and development of mRNA technology and drugs like remdesivir proving clear conflicts of interest that are ignored.
  2. is behind pushing these NIH-sponsoed inventions, while rejecting generic alternatives.
  3. has obfuscated data and censored public debate over the risk/benefit evidence on the COVID injections.
  4. continually changes his stance on masking, lockdowns, school closures and other issues based upon “reducing the accountability of cowardly officials, not the best interest of their constituents.”
  5. refuses to address blatant censorship of vaccine reaction data and blames skeptics for any future breakouts when the most likely cause is antibody dependent enhancement (ADE).

The author further points out that:

The same hubris and gaslighting in defense of “Science” has plagued every facet of our government’s response to COVID-19.

The author analyzed 00,000 pages of FOIA documents, 1,000-plus research articles, and his own published analysis of the impact of Fauci’s censorship, which was the first of its kind.

Highlights of article:

  • Fauci ensured scientific censorship was implemented to prevent public awareness of his role in gain of function research and its controversies.
  • Baric’s emails were lost amid 83,000 others but the take-away is that Peter Daszak, et al., conspired to shape the narrative.
  • This group of conspiring virologists hid their conflicts of interest, are still fighting tooth and nail to suppress information, and have expended more effort and publications in advancing their cover-up than in fighting the pandemic.
  • The signal was sent to all scientists that pursuing the lab origins angle meant career death (no academy membership), no funding (via Fauci or Ross or Farrar), no publication in the big four journals during the historic pandemic (NEJM, Science, The Lancet, and Nature — by virtue of their publishing of the tone-setting pieces), no executive patronage for things like generic drugs, etc.
  • The protection of Fauci is a “midterm election decision only, and that means the goal is to drag this out until the electoral damage can be mitigated.”
  • Recent congressional appearances by Fauci have shown that he is willing to drag this fight out forever in defense of his legacy, and many politicians are sympathetic to his plight.
  • The author includes specific questions that Fauci should be asked, that he recombines to a single thematic question: Why did the world’s leading virologists/microbiologists and top American/U.K. officials refrain from releasing their knowledge of the existence of the FCS when they first learned of it? The obvious conclusion is that they wanted to limit discussion during the early phase of their censorship.
The author is correct is stating that the only proper action is for Fauci to resign immediately and apologize for suppressing the extensive conflicts of interest, double standards, and political decisions masked as sound policy. 

Further, the paper “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” one of the most-read (and potentially most impactful) pieces of scientific propaganda published in at least a generation should be retracted.

I also agree that the failures of of leadership are ethically and morally indefensible, and sufficient evidence already exists for Congress to do the right thing moving forward, and that it will take historic leadership to honestly converse with a righteously indignant citizenry (in the U.S. and everywhere else). 

AUTHOR’S NOTE: This article details current historical research into COVID-19’s origins as part of the D.R.A.S.T.I.C. team of scientists, journalists, and researchers.

Recent news: D.R.A.S.T.I.C.’s research forms a large portion of the basis for investigations begun by the U.S. Senate, House, and National Institutes of Health. Recent appearances and/or discussion on “60 Minutes,” “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Fox News, “Joe Rogan” (again), Bill Maher, and CNN.

All references for this and other articles are compiled under my research project The Arc of Inquiry Bends Towards Enlightenment. The files include my statistical analysis of the impact of censorship on the search for the origin of SARS-CoV-2.

More than 100,000 pages of FOIA documents referred to here have been condensed into 173 pages of the most relevant selections in my appendix Prometheus Shrugged. It was here, last February, that the role of Dr. Fauci in ongoing academic censorship of COVID’s origin was first exposed. A chronological narrative of the events described throughout my research will included in a forthcoming volume of D.R.A.S.T.I.C.’s set of published collections of evidence.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Occupational Therapist Working in 3 COVID Units States “More People Dying From the ‘Vaccine’ Than From COVID”

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/board-certified-occupational-therapist-whistleblower-more-patients-are-dying-from-the-vaccine-than-from-covid/  Video Here

Board Certified Occupational Therapist Whistleblower: More Patients are Dying from the Vaccine than from COVID

“I’ve seen 32 elderly people pass away immediately after taking the Moderna vaccine.”

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Abrien Aguirre is a board certified occupational therapist who recently went public with his knowledge of working in 3 COVID units in Hawaii, two of them “isolation units.” He states that he works in the largest skilled nursing facility in Oahu, working with the geriatric population.

He was interviewed by a group known as “Hawaii Free Speech News.”

His testimony was recorded at a recent outdoor protest held at the Hawaii State Capitol in Honolulu.

He starts out his testimony by saying that the media is misrepresenting what is happening with hospitalized COVID patients. He states:

The people moved to the COVID unit, didn’t have COVID. They tested positive with the PCR test, but most of them were asymptomatic and only suffering from their pre-existing conditions.

He explains how people with terminal illnesses were put on the COVID death lists, which he says is “complete fraud.”

They rolled out the Moderna mRNA experimental injections at his facility, and he says:

I’ve seen 32 elderly people pass away immediately after taking the Moderna vaccine. None of that is being talked about on the News. It doesn’t fit their narrative.

I’ve seen more people pass away from the vaccine, than I have in COVID units.

He explains that he worked as a “Director of Rehab” in one skilled nursing facility for 5 months, and he saw where the billing department would have his therapist change medical diagnosis codes from things like pulmonary disorder to COVID because of higher reimbursements. And this even happened with cases that were not only asymptomatic, but sometimes they did not even have a positive PCR test result for COVID.

It’s just fraud on every level.

Mr. Aguirre states that he has reached out to politicians to expose this fraud, including the Governor of Hawaii, and their response is silence. Not one of them has responded.

His last advice in the interview:

My advice to people: if your elderly are sick, your grandmother, your great grandmother, your mom, don’t send them to a skilled nursing facility. They’re not going to receive adequate care.

Treatment is going to be withheld from them. They’re going to be forced to wear a mask all day, and social distance.

They’re going to become depressed and want to commit suicide. Because that is what I am seeing in our facilities.

This testimony by Abrien Aguirre is one of the most damning interviews I have ever seen. Everyone should send a copy of this video to their “elected” officials, because the U.S. medical system has now become thoroughly corrupt.

Mr. Aguirre has nothing to gain, and much to lose by going public, putting his career and possibly even his life on the line to go public with this damning information.

Since politicians are complicit with these murders and crimes, it is unlikely that they will do anything about it.

But by exposing their crimes, especially those who claim they are “just doing their jobs,” we can ensure that they will most certainly be held accountable for these murders and crimes against humanity.

There is no place in Hell too hot for where most of these people are going to end up.

This is from our Rumble Channel, and it is also on our Bitchute Channel.

_____________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Is the Government Weaponizing Data? AFD Files Injunction Against COVID Shots, DOJ Declares Vax Mandates Are a Go

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/federal/aflds-injunction/

Is the Government Weaponizing Data?

America’s Frontline Doctors files injunction against Covid Vax; Department of Justice Declares Vax Mandates are a Go

The Covid pandemic is built on data. Every action by our government in the name of public health relies upon it. Cited numbers of Covid infections and deaths justify everything from ever-fluctuating mask guidance, to how close we can stand next to each other, to how many people can sit in a restaurant, to whether our family and friends bump elbows with us, give us a hug, or wave from a distance. Data is driving what conditions our children will have when schools reopen (or choose not to). It drives whether we can be with our loved ones who are hospitalized or in nursing care.

Clearly the integrity of data about Covid-19 transmission and symptom severity should be of the highest importance to our elected officials. The people who represent us in government are creating or accepting policy that is changing the structure of our society, and shaping our future by affecting the mental and physical health of our children. Citizens are told to rely upon the data curated by our government to make decisions in our daily lives, including medical decisions.

Our current Administration relies on data for vaccine policy. President Biden is calling for citizens to go door-to-door to promote uptake of vaccines that are not approved by the FDA. And now, with the backing of the Department of Justice, the White House is encouraging businesses, government, schools, and health providers to deny services, access, and employment to those who are not vaccinated.

All of these actions and mandates rest on the foundation of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA). i EUAs were codified in 2003, as part of the George W. Bush administration’s Project Bioshield, which sought to address anticipated bioterrorist attack threats. Over the next 17 years, EUAs were issued by the FDA dozens of times in response to threats like Anthrax, Ebola, Swine Flu, and Zika. ii

Since January, 2020, there has been a massive surge in EUA use. Over 600 EUAs paved the way for Covid drugs, tests, PPE, and medical devices. iii

Underlying all EUAs is the legal necessity for a declaration of emergency. Without that declaration, every subsequent action ceases to be legal.

There is No Emergency

In general, a drug or device will not go to market without FDA approval. EUAs bypass lengthy safety and efficacy studies, in the name of an urgent threat. The EUA provision of Project Bioshield anticipated novel biological threats, for which the benefit of swift drug development and access would outweigh the risk of rapid transmission of a biological agent.

Under the law, EUAs require only a declaration by the HHS Secretary of a public health emergency, or a significant potential thereof, which is a threat to national security. iv In 2020, HHS Secretary Alex Azar declared a state of emergency due to covid on January 31. It was renewed in April, July and October, and again January 2021. Our current Secretary Xavier Becerra renewed the public health emergency again in April and July, 2021. v

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed suit on July 19,2021 with the primary focus of stopping these declarations. The group aims to halt the use of covid vaccines under EUAs, namely Janssen, Moderna and Pfizer. AFLDS further wants to prevent FDA approval of the vaccines for children, for those who have already been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and any citizen unable to give “truly voluntary, informed consent.”

The suit is supported by robust statutory, legal and factual bases. Studies are presented that challenge the public health narrative and government asserted health and safety data for the novel vaccines. The suit asserts that there is no serious or life-threatening disease, that the vaccines are not effective, that vaccine risks outweigh benefits, there are available approved alternatives, and that health professionals and the general public do not have adequate information to allow for informed choice by individuals. The essence of the suit is, safety data that is crucial for informed consent has been obscured, manipulated, or omitted.

Whistleblower: 45,000 Deaths Caused by the Vaccine

One of the most striking revelations in the suit is an expert opinion that adverse events reported in VAERS are woefully deflated. As of the filing of the suit on July 19, 2021, the number of deaths reported to VAERS associated with covid vaccines was over 9,000. Whistleblower testimony by an expert in health data analytics estimated the number of deaths within 3 days of vaccination exceeds reports to VAERS by at least a factor of 5. Under oath, the Whistleblower made a conservative estimate of 45,000 deaths after vaccination.

The Biden Administration Is Treating Informed Consent as Expendable under EUAs.

We often hear that the covid vaccines are experimental, but what does that mean? In effect, it means the vaccine development process, which can take up to 15 years from research and discovery through four Phases of trials, has been expedited to less than a year.

The AFLDS suit points out, “The American public has not been properly informed of these dramatic departures from the standard testing process, and the risks they generate.”

A Fact Sheet accompanies each vaccine, which states effectively, it is your choice to receive or not receive the vaccine. “Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.” The statement ends there and does not include any other areas of life that can be impacted by a refusal. It is upon this omission that DOJ advised the White House that the right to refusal does not “restrict public or private entities from insisting upon vaccination in any context,” and imposition of “secondary” or “nonmedical” consequences are not in violation of any law. The U.S. Constitution is notably missing from DOJ analysis of the issue.

According to the DOJ, “Although many entities’ vaccination requirements preserve an individual’s ultimate ‘option’ to refuse an EUA vaccine, they nevertheless impose sometimes-severe adverse consequences for exercising that option (such as not being able to enroll at a university” (emphasis added).

Beyond consequences for exercising the right to refuse medical intervention, however, DOJ further advises the White House that informed consent is expendable. In a Memorandum it asserts EUA law “directs only that potential vaccine recipients be ‘informed’ of certain information, including ‘the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” The Memorandum continues, “Importantly, however, and consistent with FDA’s views, we also read [the EUA law] as giving FDA some discretion to modify or omit ‘the option to accept or refuse’ notification.” (emphasis added).

In justifying its position DOJ relies on statements made in 2003 Project Bioshield hearings, by Marc McClellan, former FDA Commissioner, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, then Director of NIAID, “explaining that the informed consent requirements contained in 21 U.S.C. §355(i)(4) do not apply to EUA products.” Dr. Fauci and Mr. McClellan put on Congressional record, “[U]rgent situations may require mass inoculations and/or drug treatments, such informed consent requirements may prove impossible to implement within the necessary time frame when trying to achieve the public health goal of protecting Americans from the imminent danger.” vi

The AFLDS lawsuit articulates well the dangers we face as Americans to our informed consent:

“The combined effect of (i) the suppression and censorship of information regarding the risks of the Vaccines, (ii) the failure to inform the public regarding the novel and experimental nature of the mRNA Vaccines, (iii) the suppression and censorship of information regarding alternative treatments, (iv) the failure to inform and properly educate the public that the Vaccines are not in fact “approved” by the FDA, (v) the failure to inform and properly educate the public that the DHHS Secretary has not determined that the Vaccines are “safe and effective” and on the contrary has merely determined that “it is reasonable to believe” that the Vaccines “may be effective” and that the benefits outweigh the risks, (vi) the sustained psychological manipulation of the public through official fear-based messaging regarding COVID-19, draconian countermeasures and a system of rewards and penalties, is to remove any possibility that Vaccine recipients are giving voluntary informed consent to the Vaccines. They have no real option to accept or refuse the Vaccines. They are unwitting, unwilling participants in a large scale, ongoing non-consensual human experiment.” vii

Where Do We Go From Here?

Despite clear Executive overreach and abuse of power with respect to Emergency Use Authorizations, the Constitution is still a beacon for those standing up for informed consent and human rights. Justice Alito recently wrote very encouraging words for Americans in a dissenting opinion in one of the first Covid-related cases to reach SCOTUS:

“[A] public health emergency does not give Governors and other public officials carte blanche to disregard the Constitution for as long as the medical problem persists. As more medical and scientific evidence becomes available, and as States have time to craft policies in light of that evidence, courts should expect policies that more carefully account for constitutional rights.” viii

While the wheels of the legal system are turning, health freedom advocates do not need to wait for further injury before taking action. Take a moment right now to call for an investigation into the CDC’s data, which has been the basis for so many restrictions on our liberties. You can also take action to support organizations like Stand for Health Freedom and our co-founder Sayer Ji, along with so many others who are working every day to ensure access to reliable health data so we can all make truly informed choices for our health.

Steps You Can Take

Step One: Sign Our Petition To Convene a Special Grand Jury To Investigate the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19.

Step Two: Read our article We Are More Than 12

__________________

**Comment**

The CDC doesn’t just weaponize data, they manipulate it.  Go here to see how they twisted data to show a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”:  https://thehighwire.com/videos/cdc-caught-falsifying-data/

click

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses