Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Fauci Warns of Mu Variant. Boosters Needed For Life Despite the Thumbs Down by the FDA But the Go Ahead From the CDC. Confused Yet?

https://www.lifezette.com/2021/09/dr-fauci-warns-of-new-covid-variant

Dr. Fauci Warns Of New COVID Variant

Dr. Anthony Fauci is warning about another COVID variant, the Mu variant, on the heels of the Delta variant surge in America.

By

While Americans continue to live with COVID-19, and the Delta variant which brought a second wave of the virus to many parts of the U.S., Dr. Anthony Fauci is warning about another variant, the Mu variant.

While Fauci says that U.S. health officials are taking the new variant “very seriously,” the new strain is nowhere near the dominant one.

Fauci described the Mu variant as having mutations that suggest “it would evade certain antibodies,” such as those in vaccines.

On Thursday, Dr. Fauci predicted that Americans who have been vaccinated with the two-dose Pfizer and Moderna vaccines would need a third booster shot.

Fauci cited data from Israel showing that immunity from COVID-19 decreased after roughly eight months after receiving the initial vaccine.  (See link for article)

___________________

**Comment**

Hopefully it is clear to all now that there will be endless variants in this dystopian nightmare due to viral escape caused by leaky COVID shots which don’t stop transmission or infection. Mu is the 5th known variant – and there will be more to come, just like with the common cold and flu.

The article gives frightening details from Israel where everyone, including children, is required to receive continual boosters or their vaccine pass is not extended. Children under age three must prove their status with a faulty antigenic test.

Can you see the ongoing, never-ending madness, and boosters yet?

Rightly so, there was scuttle over booster shots, and earlier this week, two regulators with the FDA resigned out of frustration and anger over the Biden administration’s plan to roll out COVID-19 booster shots before officials had a chance to approve them.  The FDA committee voted 16-2 against authorizing a 3rd booster, but later took a second vote and passed a booster for those over age 65.

A quick glance at the chart above shows deaths after the COVID shot broken down by age. Please notice the alarmingly high numbers that have already died after the jab in the 65 and up age group. Continuing with these shots is akin to genocide. Please remember, whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork stating that tremendous pressure is being put on healthcare workers to NOT report adverse reactions, despite VAERS only capturing about 1% of actual events, so actual numbers are much, much higher.

Those believing with a religious fervor in vaccines have said their loved one who died after getting the jab would have suffered so much more without it.  The illogic is astounding.  Dead is dead.  It doesn’t get much worse than that.

Despite experts stating COVID “vaccines” ‘harm more people than they save,’ and an immunologist/virologist stating there is a 1000% increase in VAERS adverse events reports, the Biden administration is determined to jab a needle into every arm. CDC director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky overruled the advisory committee’s recommendation to limit Pfizer’s booster shot for people 65 and older, and instead aligned with the FDA authorization of a 3rd dose for the broader population including healthcare workers, grocery store workers, teachers, and others whose jobs put them at “high risk” of infections, plus prison inmates and those in homeless shelters. Please note the extreme vulnerability of those last two groups.

The elephant in the room of course is the censoring, maligning, and banning effective medications that are saving lives and render a “vaccine” null and void. This is happening right here in the U.S. and the same people/organizations behind these genocidal injections are also behind this medical tyranny and have changed goal-posts and manipulated statistics to deceive the public.  Hospitals have become ‘modern day killing fields’, due to ineffective and dangerous COVID protocols, and patients have had to resort to suing hospitals to obtain appropriate medication. Lastly, doctors are being attacked for prescribing medication and pharmacists are refusing to fill prescriptions.

Sounds like Lyme-land.

For more:

This is not the first time vaccines have been approved without appropriate safety studies: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/09/08/acip-vote-yes-for-new-vaccine-despite-no-safety-studies-on-cumulative-effect-with-other-vaccines/

  1. The approval happened years before completion of phase 3 trials.
  2. The injection was authorized for a variant that has faded from circulation.
  3. The current injection is known to be ineffective & “leaky” or will produce stronger variants.
  4. Injection efficacy versus the current Delta strain (and any yet to come) is inferior to safe, effective treatments.
  5. Pfizer unblinded their trial after a few months, eliminating the placebo arm, making the trial all but useless.
  6. FDA panelists have numerous financial and other conflicts of interest as well as the FDA receives industry funding. FDA Commissioner Hahn just accepted a job with the financiers of Moderna which violates the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that requires open forums.
  7. The FDA is a rubber stamp for Big Pharma and the Biden Administration.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

American Medical Association Instructs Doctors to Deceive

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/09/23/ama-instructs-doctors-to-deceive.

American Medical Association Instructs Doctors to Deceive

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked

September 23, 2021

Story at-a-glance

  • The Winter 2021 “AMA COVID-19 Guide: Background/Messaging on Vaccines, Vaccine Clinical Trials & Combatting Vaccine Misinformation,” issued by the American Medical Association raises serious questions about the AMA’s adherence to transparency, honesty, ethics and the moral standards to which it will hold its members
  • The guide lists nine “key messages” the AMA wants doctors to focus on when communicating about COVID-19. This includes stressing the importance of eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions, the importance of flu vaccines and COVID shots, and expressing confidence in vaccine development
  • In the guide, the AMA instructs doctors on how to disinform the public using psychological and linguistic tools. This includes explicit instructions on which words to swap for other more narrative-affirming choices
  • Word swaps include changing “hospitalization rates” to “deaths,” two terms that are not even remotely interchangeable
  • Swapping the term “Operation Warp Speed” for “standard process” is another rather egregious misdirection. The two are not interchangeable. In fact, they’re diametrically opposed to one another

The Winter 2021 “AMA COVID-19 Guide: Background/Messaging on Vaccines, Vaccine Clinical Trials & Combatting Vaccine Misinformation,”1 issued by the American Medical Association (AMA) raises serious questions about the AMA’s adherence to transparency, honesty, ethics and the moral standards to which it will hold its members.

The AMA was founded in 1847 and is the largest professional association and lobbying group of physicians and medical students in the U.S. According to the AMA itself, its mission is to promote the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health.

How then do they explain this “COVID-19 messaging guide,” which explicitly teaches doctors how to deceive their patients and the media when asked tough questions about COVID-19, treatment options and COVID shots?

AMA Teaches Doctors How to Deceive

“It is critical that physicians and patients have confidence in the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines as they become available for public use,” the “AMA COVID-19 Guide” states, adding:2

“To overcome vaccine hesitancy and ensure widespread vaccine acceptance among all demographic groups, physicians and the broader public health community must continue working to build trust in vaccine safety and efficacy, especially in marginalized and minoritized communities with historically well-founded mistrust in medical institutions.”

Indeed, the entire guide is aimed at teaching doctors how to foster confidence in the medical profession in general, as it pertains to treatment of COVID-19, but in particular as it pertains to the experimental COVID shots.

The guide provides “suggested narratives” for various engagements, such as when communicating on social media, as sell as “talking points to guide external communications,” such as when being interviewed. It lists nine specific “key messages” that they want doctors to focus on when communicating about COVID-19. These key messages can be summarized as follows:

Express confidence in vaccine development
Stress the importance of vaccines
Highlight the need to combat the spread of vaccine misinformation
Adhere to updated ethical guidance for physicians and medical personnel, which says they have a moral obligation to get vaccinated themselves
Give general vaccine recommendations, such as the recommendation for everyone over the age of 6 months, including pregnant women, to get an annual flu shot
Stress the importance of eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions
Highlight the increased availability of flu vaccines, and the importance of getting a flu shot even if you’ve gotten a COVID injection
Highlight the importance of including minorities, both in vaccine trials and as trusted messengers who can “promote social pressure” to get minorities vaccinated and dispel historical distrust in medical institutions
Denounce scientific analyses “predicated on personal opinions, anecdote and political ideologies”

AMA Concerned About Disinformation

On page 7 of the guide, under the science narrative heading, the AMA declares it is “deeply concerned that rampant disinformation and the politicization of health issues are eroding public confidence in science and undermining trust in physicians and medical institutions,” adding that “Science should be grounded in a common understanding of facts and evidence and able to empower people to make informed decisions about their health.”3

To that end, the AMA is calling upon “all elected officials to affirm science and fact in their words and actions,” and for media to “be vigilant in communicating factual information” and to “challenge those who chose to trade in misinformation.”

AMA Then Instructs Doctors on How to Disinform

It’s a disappointment, then, to find the AMA instructing doctors on how to misinform the public using a variety of psychological and linguistic tools. Perhaps one of the most egregious examples of this is the recommended “COVID-19 language swaps” detailed on page 9.

As you can see below, the AMA explicitly instructs doctors to swap out certain words and terms for other, more narrative-affirming choices. Shockingly, this includes swapping “hospitalization rates” to “deaths” — two terms that are not even remotely interchangeable!

Hospitalization rate refers to how many people are sick in the hospital with COVID-19, whereas death refers to how many people have died. The first term refers to people who are still alive, and the other refers to patients who are not alive.

It strains credulity that the AMA would actually tell doctors to substitute a factual data point with an outright lie. But with this swap, are they not telling doctors to state that people are dead, when in fact they’ve only been hospitalized with COVID-19?

covid 19 language swaps

Another highly questionable word swap is to not address the nitty, gritty details of vaccine trials, such as the number of participants, and instead simply refer to these trials as having gone through “a transparent, rigorous process.”

Swapping the factual term “Operation Warp Speed” for “standard process” is another outrageous misdirection. The two simply aren’t interchangeable. In fact, they’re actually diametrically opposed to one another. Standard process for vaccine development includes a long process of over a decade and a large number of steps that were either omitted or drastically shortened for the COVID shots.

Following standard process is what makes vaccine development take, on average, 10 years and often longer. Operation Warp Speed allowed vaccine makers to slap together these COVID shots in about nine months from start to finish. You cannot possibly say that the two terms describe an identical process.

The Power of Language

Other language swaps are less incredulous but still highlight the fact that the AMA wants its members to help push a very specific and one-sided narrative that makes power-grabbing overreaches and totalitarian tactics sound less bad than they actually are, and make questionable processes sound A-OK.

Language is a powerful tool with which we shape reality,4 because it shapes how we think about things. As noted by storyteller and filmmaker Jason Silva:5

“The use of language, the words you use to describe reality, can in fact engender reality, can disclose reality. Words are generative… We create and perceive our reality through language. We think reality into existence through linguistic construction in real-time.”

For example, “lockdown” sounds like involuntary imprisonment imposed by a totalitarian regime, which is what it is, whereas “stay-at-home order” sounds far less draconian. After all, “home” is typically associated with comfort and safety.

The same goes for using “COVID protocols” in lieu of “COVID mandates, directives, controls and orders.” “Protocols” sounds like something that is standard procedure, as if the COVID measures are nothing new, whereas “mandates, controls and orders” imply that, indeed, we’re in medical fascism territory, which we are.

How to Steer, Block, Deflect and Stall Inconvenient Questions

The AMA could have instructed its members to simply stick to the facts and be honest — and in some sections, it does do that — but it doesn’t end there. Rather, the AMA provides a full page of instructions on how to steer the conversation, and how to block, deflect and stall when faced with tough questions where an honest answer might actually break the official narrative.

Here’s a sampling of these instructions. I encourage you to read through page 8 of the guide, and pay attention to these psychological tricks when listening to interviews or reading the news.

Interviewing techniques
Steer the conversation back to the narrative by saying: “Before we leave that matter, let me add …”
Block a tough question by saying: “That’s [proprietary, confidential etc], but what I can tell you is …”
Deflect an unwanted question by saying: “That’s a common misperception but the reality is …”
Redirect away from an unwanted question, back to the official narrative by saying: “I don’t have the details on that, but what I know is …”
Stall by saying: Repeat the question asked, or acknowledge the question by saying, “I’m glad you asked …”

It’s worth noting that the AMA also stresses that: 1) Doctors are to speak for the AMA, and 2) doctors are NOT to offer their personal views. Speaking for the AMA is listed under “Your Responsibilities” when being interviewed, while not discussing personal views is listed under “Interview Don’ts.”

AMA Is Rapidly Eroding All Credibility

The AMA’s guidance isn’t all bad. Some of its advice makes perfect sense. But the inclusion of language swaps that result in false statements being made, and tools for steering, blocking, deflecting, redirecting and stalling in order to avoid direct answers do nothing but erode credibility and thus trust in the medical community.

Its direct instruction to not share personal views is another trust-eroding strategy. When people talk to their doctor, they want to hear what that doctor actually thinks, based on their own knowledge and experience.

They don’t expect their doctor — or a doctor appearing in an interview — to simply rehash a narrative dictated by the AMA. If we cannot trust our medical professionals to give their honest opinions and give direct answers, there’s little reason to even discuss our concerns with them, and that’s the opposite of what the AMA claims it seeks to achieve.

The AMA is concerned about the proliferation of misinformation and eroding trust, yet it’s telling its members to keep their professional views to themselves and lie about COVID deaths. With this guidance document, the AMA is essentially implicating itself as a source and instigator of medical misinformation that ultimately might injure patients.

In a Stew Peters Show interview (see top of this article), Dr. Bryan Ardis criticized the AMA guidance document, pointing out that while the AMA claims it put out the guidance to prevent political ideologies from dictating medicine, it is actually proving that the AMA itself is deferring to political ideology rather than medical facts.

The AMA wants its members to act as propagandists for a particular narrative — using “politically correct language” — rather than sharing information and acting in accordance with their own conscience and professional insight. As noted by Peters:

“If a doctor’s just going to repeat what the AMA tells them, why have doctors at all? You can get plenty of starving propagandists at any liberal college, but instead we want to turn our medical professionals into ideological zombies with stethoscopes.”

__________________

**Comment**

If you are a Lyme/MSIDS patient, you can be thankful there are still doctors willing to think for themselves.  Lyme literate doctors defy convention and use their own brains.  Recently I posted an article about how an independent doctor could save your life.  This has certainly held true for the issue of tick-borne illness, but also is true for COVID and many other hotly contested illnesses due to the politicization of medicine and the corruption in science.

Right now, the AMA, AphA & ASHP  are threatening doctors who prescribe ivermectin for COVID and spread “misinformation”.  Ivermectin has proven itself in study after study, as well as clinically, yet because it doesn’t fit the accepted narrative, or consensus-based medicine, it is censored, maligned, and banned.

This important 8 min. video reveals why the AMA is corrupt.  Similarly to how ILADS broke off from the IDSA due to corruption, the AAPS broke off from the AMA for similar reasons.  This excellently done short video gives the sordid history of the AMA and how from inception its major goal is to completely monopolize medicine with the help of the Rockefellers.  The AMA was found guilty in a court of law of trying to eliminate the chiropractic profession.

I’m thankful for recent papers where scientists remind us that hypotheses are not misinformation and conjecture. True science embraces alternative hypotheses, contradictory arguments, verification, refutability, and controversy. Departing from this principle risks establishing dogmas, abandoning the essence of science, and, even worse, paving the way for conspiracy theories. Further, allowing scientists, doctors, and public health ‘authorities to have conflicts of interest also hurts real science due to bias.

Category:

Activism

Weaponized Ticks? House Passes Smith Amendment Seeking Answers (But Will Get None)

https://www.lymedisease.org/ticks-weaponized-amendment/

Weaponized ticks? House passes Smith amendment seeking answers

HHS funding for Lyme disease
Sept. 24, 2021

The House of Representatives this week passed an amendment offered by New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith, directing the federal government’s “watchdog” agency to investigate the Department of Defense’s (DOD) possible weaponization of ticks and other insects with Lyme disease during its consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (H.R. 4350).

“In the spirit of transparency and accountability, my amendment directs the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to probe whether the Department of Defense ever weaponized ticks with Lyme disease or any other dangerous pathogen,” said Rep. Smith, the founding co-chair of the House Lyme Disease Caucus.

“Americans deserve the truth,” Smith said.

Millions with Lyme have a right to know

“The millions of Americans suffering from Lyme disease have a right to know whether any of this is true, and if any old research documents could be applied by current-day scientists to finding a better diagnostic or treatment—something that’s desperately needed,” said Smith, who has been advocating for Lyme patients and a more robust government response to the devastating disease since 1992.

Smith’s amendment requires the GAO to report findings to Congress of any DOD experiments on ticks or other insects for use as biological weapons from 1950 to 1977, including the experiment’s scope and whether any insects may have been “released outside of any laboratory by accident or experiment design.”
Similar amendments authored by Smith passed the House in 2019 and 2020, but did not make it through the Senate.

Questions raised by the book “Bitten”

The legislation comes in the wake of credible assertions made in numerous books and articles that significant research was conducted at Fort Detrick, Plum Island and elsewhere by the DOD to turn ticks into bioweapons causing severe disability, disease and even death to potential enemies.

One book—Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons by Kris Newby—includes interviews with Dr. Willy Burgdorfer, the researcher credited with discovering Lyme disease who also worked as a bioweapons specialist.

Combined with access to Burgdorfer’s lab files, the interviews suggest that he and other bioweapons specialists stuffed ticks with dangerous pathogens.

“To stop the spread of these horrific tick-borne diseases, we must first understand their origins and how they came to be so pervasive,” Smith said.

“If the investigation concludes our government’s bioweapons program did not contribute to the proliferation of Lyme, we turn the page. And if it did, hopefully this investigation and research will contribute to a cure,” he said.

Smith’s amendment now moves to the Senate for consideration as part of the National Defense Authorization Act.

PRESS RELEASE SOURCE: The Office of Congressman Chris Smith

Related posts:

  1. House orders Pentagon to say if it weaponized ticks and released them
  2. News media amplify question of weaponized Lyme disease
  3. NEWS: Gibson amendment on Lyme disease passes House committee
  4. NEWS: House passes Lyme legislation; now on to the Senate

______________________

https://lymediseaseassociation.org/government/federal-government/comptroller-general-investigation-of-ticks-vectors-biowarfare-passes-house/

Some things author Newby revealed for the first time in the book were: that ticks were developed and deployed as stealth biological weapons during the Cold War, and that Willy Burgdorfer, the scientist the Lyme bacteria, Borrelia burgdorferi, was named after, was at the center of this program. According to Newby, specific revelations she makes in book include:

  • A 1962 pilot study where infected ticks were dropped on Cuba sugar workers.
  • Releases of hundreds of thousands of radioactive, aggressive Lone Star ticks on the Atlantic coastal bird flyway.
  • Omissions of other microbes transmitted with Lyme-carrying ticks during the original outbreak (“Swiss Agent”).
  • Documentation of military studies where live disease-causing bacteria, some which can be spread by ticks, were sprayed from planes, boats and vehicles on the unsuspecting American public.

The Lyme Disease Association (LDA) encourages Lyme advocates, patients, and the public across the country to contact both of their US Senators to champion and support this amendment. After 45 years of Lyme disease, the truth must be uncovered.

Out of the 860 amendments offered for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), only 476 were made in order, and this one was included in the even smaller number actually passed. This shows a huge interest by government to explore this issue of Lyme and tick-borne diseases. Also, an amendment for a government investigation passed twice before in the House in 2019 and 2020. This time we all need to help persuade the Senate to keep this amendment when both Houses go to the conference committee to iron out Senate and House bill differences.

______________________
**Comment**
While it’s important to get answers, I won’t be holding my breath on this one.  This is like asking the pot to call the kettle black. All we have to do is look at the COVID debacle to determine that even with all the evidence in hand, the very people/organizations who created this ‘plandemic’ still have jobs, and are still “rock stars” to the general public.  Nothing to see here!  Lyme/MSIDS has an even longer history of corruption.
No, I don’t believe anything will come out of this investigation at all.  I pray I’m wrong.
Further, we need to stop raising money for The Cabal who has done absolutely nothing for the plight of Lyme/MSIDS patients except cause more suffering. We need to stop raising money for and working with abusers.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Ticks

Dangers of COVID-19 mRNA “Vaccination”: A Must Read Article & CDC Performing More Statistical Tricks- Counting “Vaccinated” as Unvaccinated

https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-conspiracy-theorists-were-right-it-is-a-poison-death-shot/

The Conspiracy Theorists Were Right; It IS a “Poison-Death Shot”

Mike Whitney • September 16, 2021

“I’ll do one more mind experiment with you: If everyone on the planet were to get Covid and not get treated, the death-rate globally would be less than half a percent. I’m not advocating for that, because 35 million people would die. However, if we follow the advice of some of the global leaders– like Bill Gates who said last year said “7 billion people need to be vaccinated”– then the death-rate will be over 2 billion people! SO, WAKE UP! THIS IS WORLD WAR 3! We are seeing a level of malevolence that we haven’t seen in the history of humanity!” ~ Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, Author of The Zelenko “Early Treatment” Protocol that saved thousands of Covid-19 patients. (“Zelenko schools the Rabbinic Court”, Rumble; start at 11:45 minutes)

Did the regulators at the FDA know that all previous coronavirus vaccines had failed in animal trials and that the vaccinated animals became either severely ill or died?

Yes, they did.

Did they know that previous coronavirus vaccines had a tendency to “enhance the infection” and “make the disease worse”?

Yes

(See link for article)
_________________________

**Comment**

In simple format, the article asks simple questions and gives simple answers showing that the ‘powers that be’ know exactly what they are doing and exactly what the shots are – dangerous injections that don’t stop infection, illness, or death, but are causing a multitude of adverse reactions and death.

These jabs have not even been tested on animals before being rolled out.

Also, important to know regarding boosters is that Pfizer hasn’t tested the people actually at risk.  They also have not been modified or improved to meet changes in the Delta variant or any other variants.

According to Doctors for COVID Ethics boosters are particularly problematic as they repeatedly boost the immune response to the spike protein. This means they will progressively boost self-to-self immune attack, and the greater the vessel leakage and clotting that occurs, the more likely organs supplied by the affected blood flow will sustain damage.

Excellent article.  Please read it in its entirety.

________________

http://   (Feb. 16, 2022) Approx. 13 Min

CDC Changes Vaccine Definition & Calls it ‘Normal’

Kim Iversen discusses what is outlined in the following article:  The CDC changed the definition of a “vaccine” to validate the COVID mRNA gene therapies.

  • Prior to August 26, 2021, they defined a “vaccine” as a “product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”
  • Then they changed this to a “preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” The difference is subtle but distinct:

The first one defined a vaccine as something that will “produce immunity.” The second one covers the mRNA jabs since they don’t “produce immunity,” but supposedly lessen the degree of infection – but many claim they don’t even do that.

But interestingly, Iversen must admit the truth: NO VACCINE is 100% perfect and breakthrough infections happen with ANY VACCINE.  She stumbles about, but it’s right there in purple crayon and important to remember. The next discussion of course, is that no vaccine is completely ‘safe and effective.’

https://hannenabintuherland.com/financialcrisis/cdc-now-lists-vaccinated-deaths-as-unvaccinated/

CDC Now Lists Vaccinated Deaths as Unvaccinated

Sept. 21, 2021

Herland Report: CDC Now Lists Vaccinated Deaths as Unvaccinated: While public health officials and mainstream media claim the COVID-19 pandemic is now “a pandemic of the unvaccinated,”1 we now know this claim is based on highly misleading statistics.

In a July 16, 2021, White House press briefing,2 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claimed that “over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are unvaccinated.”

A few weeks later, in an August 5, 2021, statement, she inadvertently revealed how that statistic actually came about.  (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

I posted about this statistical ‘slight of hand’ before.  Essentially, to come up with the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative, the CDC only used data when the vast majority of the public was still unvaccinated.

The CDC is further playing games to create the impression that unvaccinated people make up the bulk of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths.  They are doing this by:

  • counting anyone dying 14 days after getting the jab as unvaccinated.
  • only considering a person fully “vaccinated” a full 14 days after the second Pfizer or Moderna injection, and 14 days after the first Janssen shot.  This simply means that if a person becomes ill or dies after only 1 shot of Pfizer or Moderna, they are considered unvaccinated, and even if they get two doses and become ill or die within 14 days they are still counted as an unvaccinated case.
  • changing definitions and goalposts: CDC changed the definition of a “vaccine” to validate the COVID mRNA gene therapies. Prior to August 26, 2021, they defined a “vaccine” as a “product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” Then they changed this to a “preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” The difference is subtle but distinct: The first one defined a vaccine as something that will “produce immunity.” The second one covers the mRNA jabs since they don’t “produce immunity,” but supposedly lessen the degree of infection – but many claim they don’t even do that.
  • hiding the fact 80% of hospitalizations and deaths occur in those getting the jabs
  • using two different sets of testing guidelines: one for vaccinated patients, and one for the unvaccinated. Since the beginning, CDC has recommended a PCR cycle of 40, which flies in the face of science which has long ago established that anything over 35 will produce 97% false positives – rendering the test useless. In mid May, CDC finally lowered the cycle to 28, but only for the vaccinated. The unvaccinated are still tested using a cycle of 40 which grossly overestimates the infection rate.
  • counting only ‘break-through’ infections that result in hospitalization or death. This tactic substantially lowers the appearance of ‘break-through’ infections in those getting the jab. If this tactic was not employed we would most probably discover that the vaccinated make up the bulk of hospitalizations, making the COVID pandemic one of the vaccinated.  All we have to do is look at data from Israel to see this play out in real time.
  • counting non-COVID related illnesses as COVID. People have died in motorcycle crashes, fallen off ladders, among many other things – yet were listed as COVID deaths. There’s also numerous examples of over-reporting deaths, sometimes to the tune of 3,700% greater than what actually occurred.
  • ignoring the fact the Delta variant has 3 different mutations all in the spike protein which evades the immune response in those who got the jab – but not in those who have natural immunity. Data from the UK clearly show the jabs offer no protection from the Delta variant.
  • fear-mongering that the Delta variant is highly contagious but downplaying the fact is is far less deadly and easier to treat. In a CNN town hall meeting in Ohio President Biden emphatically but falsely stated that if you are vaccinated you are NOT going to be hospitalized, not going to the ICU, and not going to die.
  • ignoring the fact that vaccinated people needing hospitalization for the milder variant of Delta could be a blatant sign of antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) or the fact “vaccine” injuries are being misreported as ‘break-through’ cases.
  • ignoring Israeli data showing 95% of severely ill patients are fully “vaccinated”, and make up 85-90% of COVID-related hospitalizations overall.
    ignoring data from Scotland showing 87% of deaths from COVID in the 3rd wave were “vaccinated”.
  • ignoring data from Gibraltar which has a 99% compliance jab rate, showing COVID cases have risen by 2,500% since June.
  • ignoring data from Iceland which has a 82% jab compliance rate, where 77% of new cases are among the fully “vaccinated.”
  • ignoring UK data which shows in those over age 50, partially and fully “vaccinated” people account for 68% of hospitalizations & 70% of COVID deaths.
  • ignoring the fact in an outbreak in Massachusetts, 74% of COVID diagnoses and 80% of hospitalizations were among the fully “vaccinated.”
  • ignoring that the fully “vaccinated” have just as high of a viral load in their nasal passages as the vaccinated who get infected, which means the “vaccinated” are just as infectious as the vaccinated.
  • ignoring data from “vaccinated” health care workers in Vietnam infected with the Delta variant had viral loads 251 times higher than cases infected with old strains.
  • only confirming and counting people as “vaccinated” if it is added to their medical record, which often doesn’t happen in temporary vaccination clinics, or drive-through pharmacies.  Primary care offices are responsible for electronically sharing immunization data with the state’s immunization information system. Patient-recorded proof of vaccination is only accepted for the flu and pneumococcal vaccines, not the COVID shots, which means if your shot status has not be added to the electronic medical system, you are not counting as “vaccinated.”  This further skews numbers because if you are in this situation but then are admitted to the hospital with COVID symptoms, they will not count you as a “vaccinated” patient even if you got the jabs (if it isn’t in the electronic records).
  • ignoring the fact the COVID shot campaign is an ongoing clinical trial. Pundits promoting these shots as “safe and effective” are lying through their teeth because data is only being collected.
  • ignoring the fact that COVID-19 vaccines mass use and COVID-19 measures are an infringe[ment] of the Articles 2, 3, 5, 9, 11, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 27, 28 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).

See top link for sources & references

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Wuhan Scientists Planned to Release ‘Chimeria COVID Spike Proteins’ Into Bat Populations Using ‘Skin-Penetrating Nanoparticles’

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/wuhan-scientists-planned-release-chimeric-covid-spike-proteins-bat-populations-using-skin

Wuhan Scientists Planned To Release ‘Chimeric Covid Spike Proteins’ Into Bat Populations Using ‘Skin-Penetrating Nanoparticles’

by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Sep 23, 2021

18 months before the pandemic, scientists in Wuhan, China submitted a proposal to release enhanced airborne coronaviruses into the wild in an effort to inoculate them against diseases that could have otherwise jumped to humans, according to The Telegraph, citing leaked grant proposals from 2018.

New documents show that just 18 months before the first Covid-19 cases appeared, researchers had submitted plans to release skin-penetrating nanoparticles containing “novel chimeric spike proteins” of bat coronaviruses into cave bats in Yunnan, China.

They also planned to create chimeric viruses, genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily, and requested $14million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) to fund the work.

The bid was submitted by zoologist Peter Daszak of US-based EcoHealth Alliance, who was hoping to use genetic engineering to cobble “human-specific cleavage sites” onto bat Covid ‘which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells’ – a method which would coincidentally answer a longstanding question among the scientific community as to how SARS-CoV-2 evolved to become so infectious to humans.

Daszak’s proposal also included plans to commingle high-risk natural coronaviruses strains with more infectious, yet less deadly versions. His ‘bat team’ of researchers included Dr. Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as well as US researchers from the University of North Carolina and the US Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center.  (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

Important quote:

“This is clearly a gain of function, engineering the cleavage site and polishing the new viruses to enhance human cell infectibility in more than one cell line,” Angus Dalgleish, professor of Oncology at St. Georges, University of London  – Telegraph

An anonymous scientist at WHO states that Daszak’s grant proposal proposed plans to enhance the more deadly MERS virus which has a fatality rate over 30% – and is more deadly than COVID.

“If one of their receptor replacements made Mers spread similarly, while maintaining its lethality, this pandemic would be nearly apocalyptic.”  Anonymous WHO scientist

For those just tuning in, Danszak conspired with other scientists and authored a paper in the Lancet to shut down any scientific debate into the origins of COVID. Daszak thanked Fauci in private emails for downplaying the lab leak theory in front of the world stage. Fauci lied to U.S. Congress denying his role in approving and funding coronavirus gain-of-function research projects that exploit human immune systems.

In this video, Dr. Martin addresses the history of the development of the SARS bioweapon, which was originally funded for AIDS/HIV research in 1999, and he dropped this bombshell on the audience:

Anthony Fauci has spent, listen to this number, 191 BILLION dollars, not 3.7 million, not 30 million, 191 BILLION dollars of audited funds for the bioweaponization of viruses against humanity.

And it is YOUR money that has been spent.

Dr. Martin also explains how the COVID-19 “vaccine” does not meet the legal definition of a “vaccine,” but it meets the legal definition of a “bioweapon.” Source

Why are Fauci and Danszak not behind bars already?

For more:

Category:

Activism, Viruses