Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Action: End Liability Protection for ‘Vaccine’ Makers & CHD Seeks to Intervene in Vaccine Lawsuit

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/urge-your-federal-legislators-to-end-liability-protection-for-vaccine-makers

Urge Your Federal Legislators to End Liability Protection for Vaccine Makers

February 18, 2026

Take Action NowOn February 11, Senator Rand Paul introduced S. 3853, which will end the liability shield currently provided to vaccine manufacturers. A companion bill to Representative Paul Gosar’s H.R. 4668 to “End the Vaccine Carveout,” the legislation allows plaintiffs to choose whether to pursue civil action or seek compensation through the VICP, a choice they’ve been denied since 1986.

For decades, the system has favored pharmaceutical company profits over the rights of people, especially children, who have been injured or killed by vaccines. It’s time to focus on fairly compensating the individuals and families who have been devastated by adverse events following vaccination. Passage of these bills will finally level the playing field for families pursuing compensation.

This landmark legislation is long overdue, and according to a recent Fabrizio Ward poll, taking away the liability protection currently afforded vaccine makers is an enormously popular idea among Democrats, Republicans, and Independents.

Please use the form below to contact your federal Senators and Representatives and urge them to cosponsor this historic legislation.

Consider taking an additional step by calling the House Energy and Commerce Committee members to ask that they give H.R. 4668 a hearing. Start with those in your state first and call others if you have the time. It’s ok to call after hours and leave a message.

____________

Please keep in mind:

  • Pfizer offered millions in bribes & monthly wages to buy the silence of outspoken doctors critical against the clot shots.
  • allegedly, Pfizer gave $11M to Canadian officials during COVID. Millions were funneled to “Potentially Influential Government Officials,” or PIGOs. According to a lawsuit, this activity violated foreign corruption laws.
  • historically, doctors have received monetary kickbacks for pushing ‘vaccines’ upon their patients at Wellness Visits. causing the outright deaths of many infants.
  • CDC data shows MMR & MMRV linked to 2,657% more U.S. deaths than measles infection since 1995 and a study shows that when classification succeeds, 90.91% of cases are caused by the vaccine itself.
    • It’s important to note that the CDC obfuscates vaccine data is by classifying 95% of measles cases as ‘unvaccinated or unknown’– two fundamentally different categories.The agency purposely merges unknown cases with unvaccinated ones maximizing the association between measles cases and non-vaccination while obscuring uncertainty in the data.  It purposely does not apply the same logic in reverse – merging ‘unknown cases with vaccinated cases maximizing the association between measles cases and vaccination, which very well could be true.

….the cesspool is very deep indeed and the ‘vaccine’ religion is finally being questioned

Interestingly, state groups with titles like ‘American Families for Vaccines’ (AFV), formerly known as ‘SAFE Communities Coalition,’ are attempting to ban religious exemptions.  Claiming to be a ‘grassroots advocacy’ organization, it is heavily funded by Big Pharma that now has 14 state chapters but is registered as a nonprofit.

Not to be undone, Vermont‘s House of Representatives just passed House Bill 545, a sweeping law that grants the state’s unelected Health Commissioner the authority to issue official recommendations determining which vaccines children and adults should receive, explicitly naming the flu vaccine in statute—including future reformulations—and shields healthcare providers from civil liability for injuries caused by those injections.  The bill now advances to the Senate where it’s already received favor…..

The vaccine religion in real time.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/childrens-health-defense-seeks-to-intervene-vaccine-lawsuit-aap-hhs

Breaking: Children’s Health Defense Seeks to Intervene in High-Stakes Vaccine Lawsuit

In an emergency motion filed Wednesday, Children’s Health Defense and a group of parents and doctors asked a Massachusetts federal court to allow them to intervene in a lawsuit challenging recent changes to the CDC childhood vaccine schedule. “Nobody in the room is speaking for the children who were injured or killed under the schedule,” said attorney Rick Jaffe.

vaccine bottles with gavel on book

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is asking to join in a high-stakes court battle between the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

In an emergency motion filed Wednesday, CHD asked a Massachusetts federal court to join as a defendant, along with Kennedy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), in a suit filed by the AAP and other medical groups against Kennedy and HHS.

The AAP lawsuit seeks to block recent changes HHS made to the childhood vaccine schedule and other vaccine-related policies.

Attorney Rick Jaffe and Massachusetts attorney Robert N. Meltzer filed the motion to intervene in the case.

Jaffe represents CHD and five other plaintiffs in a separate lawsuit against the AAP. That suit accuses the AAP of running a decades-long racketeering scheme to defraud American families about the safety of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine schedule.

Jaffe said the AAP and HHS are litigating whether the government has the authority to revise the schedule — but neither side is addressing the more fundamental issue at stake: the safety of the former childhood schedule.

“I filed this intervention because the court is about to rule on restoring a vaccination schedule without hearing from a single family affected by it,” Jaffe said.

Jaffe told The Defender:

“You have seven trade organizations on one side and government lawyers on the other, and nobody in the room speaking for the children who were injured or killed under the schedule the plaintiffs want back.

Andrea Shaw lost twin sonsShanticia Nelson lost her daughter. The court should know their names before it rules.”

Shaw and Nelson are parents whose children died after receiving vaccines routinely recommended by the CDC. They, along with two pediatricians, are co-plaintiffs with CHD in the lawsuit against the AAP.

CHD General Counsel Kim Mack Rosenberg said the motion to intervene in the AAP’s lawsuit against HHS also raises new claims. CHD alleges that because many states have taken up AAP’s vaccine recommendations, the AAP has effectively become a state actor.

“As a state actor, AAP violates the First Amendment by tamping down doctors’ speech and by depriving listeners — like the parent intervenors here — of a variety of opinions to assist in making an informed choice,” Mack Rosenberg said.

Missing evidence: childhood schedule never proven safe

(See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

I’ve said this before, but it bares repeating: everyone loves the science when it agrees with their stance.  In the case of ‘vaccines,’ there’s a lot of missing science, namely:

  • a true placebo controlled trial AND the
  • the long term effects of ‘vaccines,’
  • the cumulative effect of all the ‘vaccines’ together

The fact these foundational issues have not even been researched shows how tainted the entire paradigm actually is.  The fact people refuse to see and admit these facts demonstrate perfectly that it’s a ‘vaccine’ religion based upon pseudo-science and even no science at all in some cases.

For more:

The BMJ and Commonwealth Fund: All Hat, No Cattle?

Before reading the following article, read this first.  It’s crucial to understand that Gates and Farrar had their hands all over everything related to COVID – including but not limited to the research being done and the global messaging about it.

The BMJ writes about how the Wellcome Trust’s investments overlap with its research efforts.  At the very bottom of the page it also lists the competing interests and that the BMJ publishes work by research groups and academics funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.

So there’s that……read on….

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/the-bmj-public-health-commonwealth-fund-debate-mary-holland-rapid-response/?

The BMJ and Commonwealth Fund: All Hat, No Cattle?

On Jan. 29, The BMJ published an op-ed by Lucinda Hiam of the Commonwealth Fund: “Public health must bridge the divide with groups who mistrust science.” Using the online “Rapid Response” form provided by The BMJ, I replied to Ms. Hiam’s call to “bridge the divide.” I said I agreed and invited her to engage with CHD. We have received no response from her, and The BMJ has not published our response.

On Jan. 29, The BMJ published an op-ed by Lucinda Hiam of the Commonwealth Fund. The op-ed — “Public health must bridge the divide with groups who mistrust science” — specifically referenced Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

Using the online “Rapid Response” form provided by The BMJ, I replied to Ms. Hiam’s call to “bridge the divide.” I said I agreed and invited her to engage with CHD.

In my response, submitted Feb. 3, I wrote:

“Let’s have an adult conversation about science, vaccination, informed consent, vaccine injury, and civil rights. I invite Ms. Hiam to engage in a public dialogue on CHD’s public platform CHD.TV, or anywhere else, to debate these critical issues.”

Despite Ms. Hiam’s stated goal to “bridge the divide,” we have received no response from her, and The BMJ has not published our “Rapid Response” to her op-ed.

As a result, The BMJ and the Commonwealth Fund have only driven the divide deeper — by failing even to afford the courtesy of a reply.  (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

And this is where ‘science’ stands…..in a vice-grip of investors who are running the show.

Those without an agenda are willing to debate those with differing opinions.  Remaining silent shows propaganda politics, not science.

Examples:

By contrast, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has agreed for years to debate anyone on vaccines.

For more:

Epstein & Gates Financed Research Portal To Control Scientific Discourse

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates-financed-researchgate-control-scientific-discourse/

‘Muzzled and Muted’: Epstein, Gates Financed Research Portal to Control Scientific Discourse

In a series of posts on X, ScienceGuardians revealed that Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates and others linked to the Gates Foundation were instrumental in financing ResearchGate, an online scientific research portal. According to ScienceGuardians, the platform was actually developed “as a for-profit business to make big money from science” — with the intent to “control the flow of scientific ideas.”

epstein, gates and money

Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates sought to profit from — and exert influence over — scientific publishing and online discourse, according to information in the “Epstein Files” released last month by the U.S. Department of Justice…..

The summary listed ResearchGate, noting that Gates provided $10 million in funding to ResearchGate in 2013. This was part of a Gates-led funding round that attracted $35 million in investments to ResearchGate.

But according to ScienceGuardians, the platform was actually developed “as a for-profit business to make big money from science” — with the intent to “control the flow of scientific ideas” and exert influence over scientific discourse.  (See link for article)

____________

Important Excerpts:

Investors included Goldman Sachs and the Wellcome Trust, led by Jeremy Farrar, Ph.D., architect of key COVID-19 pandemic-era policies and now assistant director-general of the World Health Organization.

Gates and Epstein also helped secure partnerships with the publishers of major scientific journals, including Nature. Published by Springer Nature, it is widely considered one of the “giants” of medical and scientific publishing.

Other Springer publications include Politico, Springer Health, Nature, BioMedCentral, Scientific American and Nature Medicine — publisher of the infamous “Proximal Origin” paper in 2020, used to support the claim that SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin.

Hopefully by now it’s clear why COVID messaging was so tyrannically one-sided.  Voices were simply drowned out.  This article shares how sensitive government information has been shared with Epstein.  The Biden administration and corporate media used the “Disinformation Dozen” list to discredit figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Sayer Ji. Social media platforms deplatformed those included on the list.

According to Ji, the same dark-money infrastructure they used to destroy political opponents were redeployed the identical playbook against U.S.-based health publishers and independent media.”

Internal documents leaked in 2024 showed that CCDH sought to launch “Black Ops” against Kennedy and “kill Musk’s Twitter” — now known as X. “Black ops” refers to secret operations carried out by governments or other organizations that hide their involvement.

Never trust these agencies again.  Ever.  Remain vigilant and do your own research. Whatever the CDC/FDA/NIH are peddling – do the exact opposite!

For more:

During Covid-19, one member of this small group of unaccountable actors, British medical researcher who was previously the director of the Wellcome Trust, Jeremy Farrar, has been given almost absolute power over designing the WHO’s global response to the pandemic.

“There is no peacetime any more…Preparedness and readiness is a constant and needs to be part of the fabric of society… My preference would be to streamline the architecture of global health with the WHO in the middle of the web, convening, advising, guiding and providing an emergency response… Crumbs from the table will not cut it in the era of pandemics.” ~ Jeremy Farrar (2021)  [4]

 

 

‘Lyme Disease Ruined My Life – I Was Misdiagnosed With Hypochondria and Depression For Over 20 Years’

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/lyme-disease-symptoms-bella-hadid-justin-timberlake-

‘Lyme disease ruined my life – I was misdiagnosed with hypochondria and depression for over 20 years’

Frédéric Roscop, 49, contracted Lyme disease aged five years old but wasn’t diagnosed with it until his mid-thirties. He tells Charlotte Cripps about his lifelong battle with the disease, along with co-infections and associated mental health challenges, and how he found his way to a normal life

As a child, I was raised in the French countryside in the Dordogne. From around the age of five, I’d help local farmers by collecting eggs and herding cows in the fields. I was also naturally curious and adventurous and would go exploring in the bushes. I’d often end up covered in ticks and an old lady at the farm would put me in an iron bath and brush them off me. This is not the right way of removing them, which is to pull them out of the skin, as soon as possible, to prevent the transmission of disease. It should often befollowed by a course of antibiotics.

The next day, I’d be covered in bruising and red marks, which we now call a “bullmark”, or the “bulls-eye” rash, medically known as Erythema migrans, a hallmark symptom of Lyme disease. My mum was always horrified and took me to the doctor, who thought it was an allergic reaction to a bite and prescribed me an antihistamine. But due to a lack of awareness years ago, nobody ever mentioned Lyme disease.

Looking back, I suffered years of mild symptoms. I had a delayed puberty because my body was not functioning properly; weight gain due to factors known to be caused by Lyme disease, such as gastrointestinal issues and hormonal imbalances; and I craved sugar because my body was stressed.

As much as I was exhausted, I was also hyper – Lyme disease can cause symptoms that mimic or contribute to ADHD – and I was also hyper-sensitive. I couldn’t switch off. By the age of eight, I was already seeing a psychotherapist who recommended more exercise to exhaust me.  (See link for article)

____________

**Comment**

A very dismissive article & video on Lyme disease appeared recently dissing celebrities who have the courage to share their battle with it.  Yet, because of these celebrities speaking out, more have become aware of Lyme/MSIDS.

You know it’s bad when you have to learn about a severe medical condition from a celebrity.  But, there it is…..  The truth is, it’s easier to get medical assisted death than treatment for chronic Lyme disease, which is what the man in this article had.

Whenever I see articles on how ‘things are getting better’ in Lymeland, I remember that probably every day someone just like the man in this article is being misdiagnosed and sent on a wild goose chase – maybe for years. 

No, my friends – it ain’t getting better.  Not by a long shot.  To date, the best chance a patient has is to bump into someone who will educate them about this, OR read an article about a celebrity who shares their story.

And this is where we’ve been for a long, long time.

For more:

The stories are endless and continue.  These stories touch people and like it or not, are for some the only way they will learn about this dreadful illness.  The medical and research establishments haven’t helped one iota.

I’ve always said, and I stand by it, the only way this needle is going to move is when enough people are infected with it.

Study: Unable to Produce ONE Case of Flu Despite Prolonged Close Contact But NIAID-Funded Scientists Engineer Mutant Flu Virus & ‘Expand its Host Range’

More on the ‘virus,’ ‘no virus,’ debate…..

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/niaid-funded-scientists-tried-to?

NIAID-Funded Scientists Tried to Make Influenza Spread—They Couldn’t Despite 80+ Hours of Close Human Exposure: Journal ‘PLOS Pathogens’

Researchers engineered real-world transmission conditions using infected volunteers and sealed indoor exposure sessions, but no secondary infections were detected.

A new peer-reviewed study reports that researchers were unable to produce a single confirmed case of influenza transmission in a controlled human exposure experiment, despite prolonged close contact between infected individuals and healthy volunteers.

The study, published last month in PLOS Pathogens, tested whether naturally infected people could transmit influenza to others under tightly controlled indoor conditions designed to facilitate spread.

Transmission did not occur.

“[N]o transmission was observed in this study,” the authors confirm.

Researchers recruited individuals with confirmed influenza infection and placed them in repeated exposure sessions with healthy participants inside a sealed hotel-based quarantine environment.

Volunteers interacted face-to-face, shared objects, and spent hours together in a room with intentionally low ventilation—conditions chosen to support transmission.

Even under these circumstances, no recipient developed influenza-like illness, tested PCR-positive, or showed serological evidence of infection.  (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

Even the most hardened skeptic must scratch his head on this one.

Authors give possible reasons for the unexpected outcome:

  • the sick weren’t coughing enough
  • people had immune protection
  • airflow quickly diluted exhaled breath, reducing exposure

Fleetwood points out the exact same thing was found with COVID challenge studies. In other words, exposed volunteers failed to produce sustained infections.

This experiment has been repeated numerous times now showing the same result: nadda.  Going all the way back to the 1918 influenza pandemic, an experiment was conducted on 62 prisoners:

injected with infected lung tissue from sick or deceased patients, have infected tissue dropped in their eyes, and sprayed in the nose and mouth with infectious aerosols. Others would see mucus taken from critically ill patients and put it into the noses and throats of prisoners. In other parts of the trials, experimenters would take the blood of the sick and inject it into the healthy, to see if it was spread through infectious microorganisms in the blood.

Not one got ill or died.

What nobody is saying here is that viruses don’t exist.  But, there is a camp that asserts just that.  Go here for the history of this camp.  I would say these challenge studies don’t help the virus camp.

One thing is sure: exposure alone is not enough to make someone sick.

Which makes you wonder about the purpose of this……

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/niaid-funded-scientists-engineer?

NIAID-Funded Scientists Engineer Mutant Influenza Virus and ‘Expand its Host Range’: Journal ‘Nature Communications’

Gain-of-function flu pathogen acquires new cell entry function, expands infection capability.

Scientists funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) engineered influenza viruses and introduced mutations that expanded the virus’s host range—an outcome that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) itself formally defines as gain-of-function research under a 2025 Executive Order implementation notice.

The study, published in Nature Communicationslast week, confirms the work was funded through a NIAID influenza research center.

The authors state:

“Funding was also provided, in part, by … CRIPT (Center for Research on Influenza Pathogenesis and Transmission), a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funded Center for Influenza Research and Response (CEIRR, contract 75N93021C00014…).”

The CEIRR network is one of NIAID’s primary federally funded influenza research programs.

The current Director of NIAID—allowing such risky influenza lab engineering—is Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, who holds a patent on the technology behind the Trump administration’s $500 million influenza vaccine platform.

The same federal agency funding the creation of mutated influenza viruses is led by the man who helped invent—and could profit from—the vaccine meant to fight them.

Moreover, the study comes as Congress and President Donald Trump have enacted a new law allocating more than $5.5 billion in taxpayer funding for pandemic preparedness, with influenza—the same pathogen engineered in these experiments—named as the only virus explicitly identified in the statute.

Funding for the experiment also came from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

(See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

According to attorney Tom Renz, the scuttle that dangerous ‘gain of function’ research was recently banned due to an Executive Order, is false.  Rather, it’s codified and allowed under new regulation.  It’s all good if you are compliant with current regulation.

“Gain of Function” has now been legitimized and sanctioned.  Far from being banned.

The ‘no virus’ camp rolls their eyes at all of this because according to them, none of this exists.

Something exists and something is making people sicker than dogs. How about we find out what is causing these illnesses killing people and STOP funding research making pathogens deadlier?

For more:

Regarding Wisconsin: