Please see the following inquiry that will most likely go unanswered. Note that Dr. John Aucott is a coauthor of this study who often says he believes in chronic Lyme disease but only at Lyme disease events held by advocacy groups.
———- Original Message ———- From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net> To: “aghirsch@geisinger.edu” <aghirsch@geisinger.edu> Cc: “aejustice1@geisinger.edu” <aejustice1@geisinger.edu>, “cmnordberg@geisinger.edu” <cmnordberg@geisinger.edu>, “nsjosyula@geisinger.edu” <nsjosyula@geisinger.edu>, “jaucott@jhmi.edu” <jaucott@jhmi.edu>, “alison.rebman@gmail.com” <alison.rebman@gmail.com>, “bschwar1@jhu.edu” <bschwar1@jhu.edu>, “bmcinfectiousdiseases@biomedcentral.com” <bmcinfectiousdiseases@biomedcentral.com>, “irina.masalagiu@springernature.com” <irina.masalagiu@springernature.com>, “rauf.bhat@springernature.com” <rauf.bhat@springernature.com> Date: 03/01/2025 12:04 PM EST
Subject: A comparison of genome-wide association analyses of persistent symptoms after Lyme disease, fibromyalgia, and myalgic encephalomyelitis – chronic fatigue syndrome
Annemarie G. Hirsch, Anne E. Justice, Amy Poissant, Cara M. Nordberg, Navya S. Josyula, John Aucott, Alison W. Rebman & Brian S. Schwartz
To: Annemarie G. Hirsch, Corresponding Author
I read your manuscript with great interest and wanted to share a comment on your article I received from a fellow researcher who has experienced first-hand the devastation of Lyme disease. I added HTML links (references) to his statement and included my own comment. Additionally, I have a question for you and your co-authors.
Comment received:
“With respect may I say as Lyme and PTLD victim, Borrelia has the following characteristics:
Or, maybe it’s as the authors claim that PTLD is associated with:
“Our top index single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs77857587, is in high linkage disequilibrium with a long-range protein quantitative locus SNP, rs111774530, for the MARC2 (Mitochondrial Amidoxime Reducing Component 2) protein.”
What academic discipline would you encounter if your department acknowledged chronic Lyme disease and began focusing on finding effective antimicrobial treatments for all borrelia forms; round body, biofilm etc.?
Patients in U.S. hospitals were given COVID-19 vaccines without their knowledge or consent while under sedation.
Legal teams claim health care workers have confirmed the practice, calling it an “abominable covert act.”
A mother in the UK fights to stop a hospital from vaccinating her Down syndrome child under sedation against her will.
Medical journals propose administering vaccines during perioperative periods to boost compliance, raising ethical concerns.
Hospitals discarding medical ethics to increase vaccine uptake
In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves through the medical and legal communities, hospitals across the United States are being accused of covertly administering COVID-19 vaccines to patients while they are under sedation. According to attorneys representing victims, this egregious practice bypasses informed consent and violates fundamental medical ethics. The allegations, brought forward by the Freedom Counsel, a legal group defending those affected by vaccine mandates, suggest that patients undergoing routine medical procedures were injected with experimental mRNA vaccines without their knowledge—a practice one lawyer described as an “abominable covert act.”
Warner Mendenhall, founder of the Freedom Counsel, stated on social media platform X that his team has verified multiple accounts of patients being vaccinated while under anesthesia. “Were you or a family member COVID vaxxed while under sedation? We are hearing stories of this abominable covert act,” Mendenhall wrote. He added that many patients would have no way of knowing they were jabbed, as the injections were likely not documented in their medical charts.
This disturbing trend is not isolated to the U.S. In the UK, a mother is battling the National Health Service (NHS) to prevent her Down syndrome child from being vaccinated against COVID-19 while under sedation. The mother described the hospital’s plan as “tantamount to assault” and a blatant violation of human rights. (See link for article)
Harvard trained pathologist, Dr. Cole, was among the first to note mysterious blood clots in deceased people who’d been ‘vaccinated’ with the COVID gene therapy.
American virologist Dr. Robert R. Redfield, who served as the director of the CDC during the ‘pandemic,’ has admitted that reports of ‘so-called Long Covid’ are actually a cover-up for global surges of “mRNA vaccine injury.”
The diagnosis of long COVID often relies on symptoms post-COVID-19, occasionally lacking biological evidence. This case study illustrates how investigating long COVID uncovered an underlying bartonellosis through clinical metagenomics. Following mild COVID-19, a 26-year-old woman experienced persistent symptoms during 5 months, including axillary adenopathy. Pathological examination, 16 S rRNA PCR, and clinical metagenomic analysis were done on an adenopathy biopsy. The latter revealed Bartonella henselae DNA and RNA. Treatment with clarithromycin improved symptoms. This case underscores the relevance of clinical metagenomics in diagnosing hidden infections. Post-COVID symptoms warrant thorough investigation, and bartonellosis should be considered in polyadenopathy cases, regardless of a recent history of cat or flea exposures.
_______________
**Comment**
Axillary adenopathy, or swollen lymph nodes under the armpit, are common with Bartonella – but also with other things as well. It’s the body’s response for a foreign invader.
For those that read information on this website know – ‘long COVID’ has been linked to the COVID gene therapy injection, as well as mask wearing, but mainstream media and research are not even considering them. Another little factoid is the fact is that another recent study admonishes against using the term Long COVID as the symptoms are no worse than those after the flu. In fact, PCR testing can’t distinguish between COVID and the flu. So, what in fact is causing lingering symptoms in some people and how severe are they actually?
Sadly, this abstract doesn’t inform us as to the ‘vaccination’ and mask status of the patient. A review of masks show contaminants that are carcinogenic and infectious as well the fact masks make people sick.
ALL research from here on out needs to identify the patient’s ‘vaccination’ status, how many injections they’ve received, as well as if they are mask wearers.
Hopefully, people are becoming aware that ‘vaccines’ serve as triggers to upset the immune system, which can allow hidden infections to suddenly give noticeable symptoms.
Another important point is the choice of clarithromycin for Bartonella treatment. While this is partly a good choice, any experienced Lyme literate doctor would know to pair this with rifampin. Antibiotic resistance can and does happen so treatment should do all to avoid this possibility, and using at least two antibiotics simultaneously is one such method, and unfortunately, even then, relapses often occur.
Blueprint for Government-Controlled Medicine Sidesteps RFK Jr.
By The ANH Team
Just as RFK Jr. gets his legs under his desk at HHS, a centralized public health agenda is gathering pace that threatens medical freedom, farmers’ rights, food security, and individual choice. Action Alert!
The CDC’s One Health Framework centralizes authority over public health decisions, potentially limiting independent research, open discussion, and medical freedom.
The rollout of One Health is part of the public health response to bird flu, mirroring the COVID-19 playbook.
The One Health approach sets the stage for greater government control, mandated health policies, and reduced medical autonomy.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Department of Interior (DOI) have jointly unveiled their National One Health Framework to Address Zoonotic Diseases and Advance Public Health Preparedness in the United States. Framed as a way to address zoonotic diseases and public health challenges—like the H5N1 bird flu—the One Health approach claims to integrate human, animal, plant, and environmental health concerns into a unified strategy. In our view, this framework lays the groundwork for sweeping governmental control over medical (and veterinary) decision-making and, in the case of the bird flu, direct intervention in the nation’s food supply.
One Health: Centralized Control Disguised as Public Health
The One Health approach has been around for several years but had not become official policy until January 2025. The policy effectively consolidates power in the hands of three federal agencies led by the CDC, USDA and DOI, dictating public health responses during crises. Instead of allowing independent research, open discussion, and medical freedom, this framework ensures that a “unified federal voice” dictates the narrative and available treatment options.
Crucially, the powers-that-be appear to be deploying One Health policies primarily through the USDA and not the CDC, which comes under the jurisdiction of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This shift away from CDC control is likely linked to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s role as new head of HHS, and he has been vocally resistant to pharmaceutical-driven health policies. The rollout of One Health, which emerged during the COVID era under the Biden administration, is being justified by rising concerns over the bird flu situation.
COVID Redux: H5N1
H5N1 avian influenza, aka ‘bird flu’, renamed more recently (presumably because it sounds more dangerous?) as ‘highly pathogenic avian influenza’ (HPAI) is a highly transmissible viral infection that primarily affects wild birds but has spread among poultry and dairy cows in the US. There have been a handful (70) human cases so far in the US with 1 death, according to the CDC. (You can reference our earlier coverage of the bird flu hereto get more background.)
The unfolding public health response to H5N1 bird flu mirrors the tactics used during COVID-19, except this time the food supply is involved. Scientists working under the pretext of pandemic preparedness have long manipulated avian influenza viruses, increasing their ability to cross species and infect humans (sound familiar?). Pharmaceutical interventions like mRNA vaccinesare already in development using half a billion dollars of taxpayer money, ensuring that government-backed solutions are already in place if/when further outbreaks occur.
Federal agencies have used this situation to justify mass culling of poultry, purportedly to prevent further spread. Just as during COVID-19, PCR testing—known for its high false-positive rates—is being used to assess the number of infections. Inflated case numbers fuel media hysteria and the sense that there is a public health crisis. The result is artificial food shortages and price inflation.
You can see where this is going: to return to “normal,” we’re going to be told to accept mandatory vaccination of farm animals under the guise of disease prevention—no matter what the human health consequences may be of eating food that has been treated with mRNA vaccines. This crisis ultimately forces farmers and the public into compliance, making acceptance of One Health measures a prerequisite for food security.
Why This Matters
The One Health Framework is, in essence, an infrastructure for centralized medical and veterinary control. By ensuring a unified government voice, dictating public and animal health responses, and training agencies to enforce these directives, the plan undermines medical and health freedom as well as the right to informed choice. Under One Health-style frameworks, it’s not hard to imagine what the next round of lockdowns might look like, with public health authorities having learned from the mistakes of the first round during COVID.
A similar push for centralized control is evident in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) plans to exert greater influence over global health policies (see ANH International’s analysis). President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the WHO was driven by desire to resist global control, but only time will tell how the new Administration will respond to centralized, coordinated responses like One Health that develop within America’s borders. There is also the specter of how future presidents might act in relation to the WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and other United Nations’ agencies. The One Health Framework is, oddly, entirely in alignment with the global doctrines of UN agencies, and they potentially lay the foundation for international directives that override national sovereignty in health or veterinary policy.
Farmer First and Health Freedom
Outbreaks of highly contagious diseases like bird flu have already led to large-scale culling of poultry in the US, with over 35 million birds in commercial flocks being killed so far. This has caused significant distress and financial hardship for poultry farmers. The policy is part of the ‘stamping-out’ policy for avian influenza that meets World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) standards in an effort to maintain international poultry exports. Accordingly, the USDA is using the policy to force farmers to cull their flocks when ‘HPAI’ is detected, regardless of whether or not animals are sick. Many farmers and farmers’ groups are questioning the ethical and animal welfare impacts of the ‘stamping-out’ policy.
But it’s not just farm animals that are at risk of these draconian policies. One Health envisions coordinated responses against human cases that follow the rubric that was so widely adopted—and rarely questioned—by government authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rather than consolidating authority into a top-down bureaucracy, we should encourage open scientific debate rather than enforcing a unified narrative, promote individual choice in medical treatments, ensure transparency and accountability in public health decisions, and prioritize local or regional responses and health strategies over broad federal mandates.
Public health should empower individuals, not enforce compliance. The CDC’s One Health Framework moves us toward an era where governments dictate medical choices, silencing those who dare to question official recommendations.
It’s time to reject centralized medical authoritarianism and advocate for a diverse, open, and decentralized health system that encourages the dissemination of truthful health information and respects the right of individuals to make informed choices about their own bodies and well-being.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to reject the One Health framework to protect individual medical autonomy. Please send your message immediately.
Go to top link to write Congress to oppose One Health Framework.
______________
**Comment**
Sadly, a lot of Lymeland has embraced One Health, and research is nearly all earmarked with this Trojan Horse euphemism. The similarly and disastrously named PTLDS comes to mind.
Reggie Littlejohn, founder and president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and co-chair of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force, described One Health as “a very holistic-sounding approach to healthcare” that emphasizes “the interface between human health, animal health, plant health and ecological health.”
“All of that sounds very inclusive and holistic,” said Littlejohn, but “my concern is that it gives the WHO, under the pandemic treaty, the ability to intervene in any aspect of life on earth. So, if they find a health risk that involves animals or plants or even the environment, not just humans, then they can go into operation concerning that.”
“The entire One Health Scheme is based upon the patent lie and obvious disinformation that COVID-19 somehow magically leaped from some animal in the Wuhan wet-market instead of being an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain-of-function properties that leaked out of the Wuhan BSL4 [biosecurity level 4 lab].”
In this explosive conversation, Gary Null takes a hard look at the deception within modern medicine, the history of scientific suppression, and the power structures shaping public health.
🔹 The Myth of Trusting Authorities – How institutions like the CDC, FDA, and AMA have misled the public for decades.
🔹 The Fluoride Controversy – Why fluoridation in public water was a political and industrial scheme rather than a health initiative.
🔹 The Pharmaceutical Industry’s Grip on Medicine – How Big Pharma profits from chronic disease while dismissing alternative treatments.
🔹 The Suppression of Natural Healing – The untold stories of whistleblower doctors and researchers whose work challenged the status quo.
🔹 How Propaganda Shapes Public Health Decisions – The tactics used to silence dissenting voices in medicine, from vaccines to nutrition.
🔹 The Forgotten History of Health Pioneers – How early natural health advocates were erased from mainstream medical narratives.
🎙️ Null doesn’t hold back in this eye-opening discussion about why the public has been conditioned to accept misinformation as truth—and what we can do about it.
📌 Watch now to uncover the real forces driving modern healthcare!
🔔 Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more content!
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 