Author Archive

Adverse effects from COVID Shots Due to Stress Caused By ‘Anti-vaxxers’… Meanwhile in the Real World, Pathophysiology of the mRNA Molecule Explained As Sudden Deaths Continue

You seriously can’t make this stuff up…..

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36381188/

Covid 19 vaccines and the misinterpretation of perceived side effects clarity on the safety of vaccines

Raymond D Palmer 1 2

Free PMC article

Abstract

In the era of Covid 19 and mass vaccination programs, the anti-vaccination movement across the world is currently at an all-time high. Much of this anti-vaccination sentiment could be attributed to the alleged side effects that are perpetuated across social media from anti-vaccination groups. Fear mongering and misinformation being peddled by people with no scientific training to terrorise people into staying unvaccinated is not just causing people to remain susceptible to viral outbreaks, but could also be causing more side effects seen in the vaccination process. This brief review will offer data that may demonstrate that misinformation perpetuated by the anti-vaccination movement may be causing more deaths and side effects from any vaccine. A mini review of published literature has been conducted and found that mental stress clearly causes vasoconstriction and arterial constriction of the blood vessels. Therefore, if subjects are panicked, concerned, stressed or scared of the vaccination, their arteries will constrict and become smaller in and around the time of receiving the vaccine. This biological mechanism (the constriction of veins, arteries and vessels under mental stress) is the most likely cause for where there has been blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, dizziness, fainting, blurred vision, loss of smell and taste that may have been experienced shortly after vaccine administration. The extreme mental stress of the patient could most likely be attributed to the fear mongering and scare tactics used by various anti-vaccination groups. This paper does not aim to rule in or out every side effect seen, but it is highly likely that many apparent side effects seen shortly after a subject has received a vaccine could be the result of restricted or congested blood flow from blood vessel or arterial constriction caused by emotional distress or placebo based on fear around vaccines.

_________________

**Comment**

Just who is this Raymond D Palmer, the author of this atrocious study?  The reason this is important is because this bogus study is posted on the U.S. government’s official website.

According to this, Palmer has a dubious background.

His Linkedin profile offers some clues (It appears his profile has now been deleted):

So he’s a mRNA Alchemist (pseudoscience) who speaks Chinese, and his top interest is Pfizer’s Albert Bourla.

Education-wise, he jumps from web design, to real estate, to electrical engineering. Then a course in astronomy and astrophysics. (Palmer is very into astronomy. This is his space photography site and this is a Perth Now feature on his 2009 solo space photography exhibition). Suddenly in 2019 he starts taking online courses in epigenetics, biochemistry, genetic engineering and the like. He publishes his first paper in a cardiovascular medicine journal the same year that he starts studying epigenetics, with no prior training in any related field.   Source

Please go here for more on his NIAID and NIH connections, NDAs, Hong Kong investors, and more.
And here for more crazy, unearthed information.

Palmer cites a single WHO-led study in support of this claim that post-vaccination adverse events are not causally linked to the vaccines.1  They simply worked off the presumption that the shots are not the cause of post-“vaccination” events, which ignores an immense body of literature demonstrating causal links.  Source

Palmer therefore hypothesizes that it must be those nasty “anti-vaxxers”.

Seriously, nothing shocks me anymore. There is ZERO integrity in science any more.

I wonder if Palmer truly understands what he is implying? He has completely snuffed out the “safe and effective” mantra by stating that the safety of “vaccines” is dependent upon the recipient’s psychological condition. 

You want to know what stresses me out?  Digital Vax Certificates. Go here to find out why.

It’s curious Palmer didn’t bother to mention the following very real stressors happening in the real world that have caused untold damage:

_________________

Meanwhile, back in the real world …..

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/on-the-sudden-death-pathophysiology?

On the Sudden Death Pathophysiology of the Vaccine mRNA Molecule

A Summary (for the General Public) and Commentary Regarding the Case Report Published by Dr. Michael Mörz (pathologist)

James Lyons-Weiler

Images in the Mörz article (See link) support the following hypothesis:

  • When the mRNA (that is embedded in the lipid nanoparticle of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) is injected into the arm, the mRNA finds its way (via the blood stream) into distant cells—in this case endothelial cells that line the small blood vessels in the heart and brain. (The vaccine does not simply stay in the arm.)
  • Once in the endothelial cell(s), the mRNA instructs the ribosomes in the cell to manufacture spike protein.
  • The spike protein then migrates to the outer surface of the endothelial cell.
  • The immune system then recognizes the spike protein (or fragments thereof) as foreign and concludes that the endothelial cell has become infected.
  • Accordingly, the immune system sends lymphocytes and other inflammatory cells into the walls of the vessel to attack the presumed infected endothelial cell.
  • The vessel wall becomes inflamed (vasculitis) and, during this process, the endothelial cells become immunologically injured and may swell to varying degrees. Sometimes, abnormal intravascular coagulation (clotting within the vessel) may be triggered. In some instances spike protein may appear within the brain (or heart) tissue, where the spike protein may trigger an inflammatory reaction (encephalitis, myocarditis)

Originally Published on Notes from the Social Clinic, Nov 10, 2022

Brief summary by Dr. Rennebohm, author of the summary below: The Morz et al. study “documents the abundant presence of vaccinal spike protein in the capillaries of the brain and heart, and he shows how this is associated with vasculitis, necrotizing encephalitis, and myocarditis.”

(See link for article & in depth details)

________________

https://rumble.com/v1xxjz4-2nd-grade-student-suddenly-dies-kids-struggling-to-concentrate-post-vaccina.html  Video Here (Approx. 3 Min)

Canadian Doctor Reports on the Epidemic of Sudden Deaths

Doctor William Makis states an epidemic of sudden death taking effect in Canada overshadows dementia and heart disease to become Alberta’s top killer. Doctors who complied to a strict vaccine mandate to keep their jobs have had 3-5 shots and now 93 Canadian physicians (and counting) have succumbed to sudden death.

But it’s not just doctors who are dying suddenly.

Makis reports nurses, paramedics, police, firefighters, and teachers are also dying suddenly.  A second grade student just died.

Teachers are reaching out to Makis as they are seeing injuries and immune reactions, such as asthma, in children as well as the fact they aren’t able to concentrate in class.

Makis mentions the documentary “Died Suddenly,” which shows bizarre white, rubbery blood clots in the “vaccinated,” which can also been seen here and here.  He also mentions research that has been done where scientists have taken blood and exposed it to the spike protein, and the blood starts clumping almost immediately.  These proteins get built into the blood clots — amyloid proteins that make amyloid fibrils, which cause long clots that are very firm and rubbery. The body cannot degrade these clots, and doctors are finding that regular blood thinners don’t work.

If you are one of the unfortunate victims of these clot shots, please see The Spike Detox Guide put out by World Council for Health.

Category:

research, vaccines, Viruses

Google & YouTube Invest $12 Million in Poynter For “Fact-Checking” Which FB Admits Are Opinions

https://www.activistpost.com/2022/12/grotesque-google-youtube-invest-12-million-in-global-fact-checking-media-network

“Grotesque”: Google, YouTube Invest $12 Million in Global Fact-Checking Media Network

DECEMBER 1, 2022

By Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., The Defender

Reacting to Tuesday’s announcement that Google and YouTube will fund a global fact-checking network through the media institute Poynter, media expert Mark Crispin Miller, Ph.D., said, “This is grotesque — almost to the point of comedy, except it’s not funny.”

Claiming that “Combating misinformation is an ongoing global challenge for society,” Google and YouTube on Tuesday said they will spend $12 million to create a Global Fact Check Fund that will support a network of 135 fact-checking organizations operating from 65 countries in more than 80 languages.

The money is part of a $13.5 million grant the tech companies awarded the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), a division of the nonprofit media institute Poynter, according to Mashable.

The money will go toward scaling up existing operations of Poynter’s IFCN, and also toward launching new initiatives to elevate what the IFCN deems to be “information” and reduce what it deems to be “misinformation,” the companies said.

“The world needs fact-checking more than ever before,” said Baybars Örsek, executive director of the IFCN. “This partnership with Google and YouTube infuses financial support to global fact-checkers and is a step in the right direction.”

However, Mark Crispin Miller, Ph.D., professor of media studies at New York University, told The Defender he found the development to be “grotesque — almost to the point of comedy, except that it’s not funny.”

Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D., author of Google Archipelago: The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom, also criticized Google and YouTube’s financial partnership with the IFCN, telling The Defender:

Google and YouTube are not purveyors of information; they are tools for the totalitarian control of information. They have engaged in censorship, down-ranking, and black-listing information, likely since their inception.

Their outsourcing of such functions to the IFCN is no surprise at all. The IFCN is merely an agent of the totalitarian regime.

(See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

Hopefully the past two years have educated the public on how one man’s ‘misinformation’ is another man’s truth.  All this censorship does is make it harder to read dissenting opinions from the accepted narrative, which hurts everyone.  This is causing people to go elsewhere for their information – and rightly so.

After being sued, Facebook admits it’s “Fact checks” are statements of opinion which are protected under the First Amendment.

Poynter, who’s revenue increased 150% since 2017-2022, engages in “double-speak” when it says it “fortifies journalism’s role in a free society” and “champions freedom of expression,” while it censors dissenters, clearly exemplifying the tactic of using the inverse of the truth. 

Now, thanks to this new grant from Google and Youtube, IFCN can expand its “fact-checking.”

Major funders are:

The Defender reached out to Poynter requesting more specific information about its funding sources but Poynter did not respond by the deadline.

For more:

Category:

Activism

When Babesiosis Turns Deadly

https://danielcameronmd.com/when-babesiosis-turns-deadly/

WHEN BABESIOSIS TURNS DEADLY

babesiosis-turns-deadly
In their case report “Fatal Babesiosis in an Immunocompetent Patient,” Selig and colleagues describe a 48-year-old man who died within days of being admitted to the hospital from babesiosis and yet, he didn’t have any significant risk factors for severe presentation of the illness. [1]

By Dr. Daniel Cameron

The man presented to the emergency department with fatigue, generalized weakness and intermittent subjective fevers. The symptoms had worsened over a 2-week period.

The patient also complained of headaches, vision changes, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. And had a medical history of type 2 diabetes and intermittent asthma.

“He denied any known recent tick or animal exposures, any recent travel, or previous blood transfusions,” the authors write. 

“On arrival to the ED, the patient was tachycardic, afebrile, and normotensive,” the authors write. “A blood parasite smear returned with small ring-form parasites with 25% [red blood cells] infected, consistent with babesiosis.”

“Human babesiosis is an emerging infectious disease with a progressively rising number of cases in the Northeast over the last few decades.”

The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit and began treatment with azithromycin and atovaquone, along with doxycycline for any co-infections, such as Lyme disease.

However, the next day, the patient’s conditioned deteriorated and he required endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation. Several days later, he died.

“A few days following the patient’s death, babesia studies returned with PCR positive for B. microti and positive anti body findings (IgG 1:128 and IgM 1:160) confirming the babesiosis diagnosis,” the authors write.

PODCAST: Delayed onset Babesia

The authors suggest, “Clinicians should be aware that even in patients without the classic risk factors of asplenia, advanced age, and immunocompromised status for severe presentations of babesiosis, a deadly case can present.”

They noted that although their patient suffered from type 2 diabetes, an immunocompromised condition, diabetes has not previously been shown to be a significant risk factor for severe babesiosis.

Related Articles:

The case of an untreated Babesia infection
Wide range of babesia symptoms and presentations

References:
  1. Selig T, Ilyas S, Theroux C, Lee J. Fatal Babesiosis in an Immunocompetent Patient. R I Med J (2013). 2022 Aug 1;105(6):20-23. PMID: 35881994.

For more:

Category:

Babesia, research, Uncategorized

LymeX Prize Competition Announces Ten Phase 1 Winners

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/31127539

LymeX prize competition announces ten Phase 1 winners

Carl Tuttle

Hudson, NH, United States

NOV 30, 2022 — 

Please see the following letter sent to all winners of the LymeX prize…

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “contact@steveandalex.org” <contact@steveandalex.org>
Cc: The Tick-Borne Disease Working group and all winners of the LymeX prize
Date: 11/30/2022 1:12 PM
Subject: LymeX prize competition announces ten Phase 1 winners

November 7, 2022

LymeX prize competition announces ten Phase 1 winners
https://www.lymedisease.org/lymex-phase-one-winners/

“The ultimate goal of the multiphase competition is to nurture the development of diagnostics toward Food and Drug Administration review.” 

To all winners of the Phase 1 LymeX Diagnostics Prize competition,

After spending the last thirteen years studying the mishandling of Lyme disease, I felt compelled to share the following facts (and supporting documentation) regarding prior attempts to introduce “new and/or improved” diagnostic detection methods. I concluded that a chronic relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the business model of vaccine development, patent royalties and pharmaceutical profits so laboratory confirmation of persistent infection after antibiotic treatment must be squelched/suppressed at all costs.

Examples

1. Culture: Advanced Laboratory Services

Barbara J.B. Johnson, microbiologist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claimed laboratory contamination in reference to positive test results (Chronic Lyme) found in Advanced Laboratory Services’ Borrellia culture test. If this is the case, why didn’t the CDC work with Advanced Laboratory Services to perfect its culture test and resolve the so-called “contamination” issues?

New Lyme Culture Test Failed CDC Analysis Aug 20, 2013
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/809626

New CDC/FDA Warning Against Unapproved Lyme Culture Test
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/823840

“Dr. Nelson emphasized that for Lyme disease diagnosis, the CDC recommends a 2-step process of serologic testing: first, an FDA-cleared enzyme immunoassay, followed in immunoassay-positive or equivocal cases by confirmatory Western blot. Only patients positive on both tests are considered to have Lyme disease.”

Carl Tuttle’s comment: Current FDA approved Lyme disease tests (Antibody tests) cannot be used to gauge treatment failure or success which makes them ideal for concealing an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug allowing the thirty-year-old dogma to remain intact.

2. PCR testing:

We have seen similar actions from the CDC with PCR testing as well. In May of 2012 the CDC announced the Development of a Novel Genus-specific Real-time PCR Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Bartonella Species and Genotypes:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22378904

Here the CDC is using PCR for a definitive diagnosis of Bartonella however, according to the CDC and the ALDF group on June 11, 2012 PCR cannot be used for Lyme diagnosis per the CDC expert commentary posted on Medscape below:

PCR for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease: Is It Useful? Christina A. Nelson, MD, MPH
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/764501

Quotes from Christa Nelson: (Medical Officer in the Bacterial Diseases Branch of CDC’s Division of Vector-Borne Disease)

“Is PCR useful for the diagnosis of Lyme disease? In general, the answer is no.”

“Two-tiered serology remains the mainstay of laboratory testing for Lyme disease.”

Carl Tuttle’s comment: PCR is acceptable for Bartonella but not Lyme disease. Double standard here?

3. Nested PCR and DNA sequencing: Milford Molecular Diagnostics

In September of 2012 the CDC entered into an agreement with Dr. Sin Lee to evaluate the viability of his DNA sequencing technology. Martin E. Schriefer, Ph.D., the chief of the CDC’s diagnostic and reference laboratory, stated the following: (from the attached court document)  https://www.dropbox.com/s/8irsb6oqunwy3zq/Notice%20of%20Appeal.pdf?dl=0

“So wherever possible we encouraged and required other non-serologic-based tests in addition to clinical presentation so that might have included PCR or culture or both. . . . And again I’m looking forward to seeing a greater utilization of PCR as a diagnostic tool in the future.” -Martin E. Schriefer, Ph.D.

When Dr. Lee published a case of persistent infection (Chronic Lyme disease) in 2014 all communication with the CDC ended abruptly with no explanation.

DNA Sequencing Diagnosis of Off-Season Spirochetemia with Low Bacterial Density in Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia miyamotoi Infections  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139787/

Carl Tuttle’s Comment: It should be noted that the chronic Lyme disease case identified in this publication was found in blind-coded serum samples sent to Dr. Lee’s laboratory from the CDC’s Lyme disease serum repository and other species of Borrelia were found within these samples using DNA sequencing; the CDC had no idea that multiple pathogens were involved.

Has the CDC purposely discredited other innovative technologies which are in competition to the invention being patented by Theresa M. Russell and Barbara J.B. Johnson of the NCEZID under Pub. No. WO 2013110026 A1 entitled “Compositions and methods relating to Lyme disease”?

Dr. Lee although participated in the competition, was not awarded the LymeX prize. Does anyone believe that this decision was just a coincidence?

4. NIST

New Experimental Test Detects Signs of Lyme Disease Near Time of Infection February 11, 2016
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2016/02/new-experimental-test-detects-signs-lyme-disease-near-time-infection

“The current standard blood test for Lyme disease exposes the infection only after antibodies have accumulated to detectable levels, which can take up to 4 to 6 weeks. If patients exhibit a telltale bull’s-eye rash, diagnosis and treatment can begin earlier. But the rash does not occur in 20 to 30 percent of Lyme disease patients, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rather than waiting for an infected person’s immune system to produce noticeable amounts of antibodies, the team chose to home in on the bacteria itself—specifically, proteins the bug sheds when attacked by the body’s defenses.

“From many candidates, we chose one that is both easily distinguished from human serum proteins and an unambiguous indicator of the bacteria,” Turko says. “This protein, which resides on the outer surface of membranes, became the target of our search in serum samples.”

Carl Tuttle’s comment: Response from Dr Illarion Turko; “This project did not receive further development and is on-hold for now.”

So, who at the CDC got to Dr. Turko and discouraged further development?

Other examples of interference/intimidation

In 2008 Nordin Zeidner published his study regarding single dose Doxycycline for tick bite. Pamela Weintraub interviewed Zeidner for her book:

Cure Unknown (Revised Edition): Inside the Lyme Epidemic

By Pamela Weintraub

https://books.google.com/books?id=

Excerpt:

“Immunologist Nordin Zeidner, chief of the CDC’s Vector-Host laboratory in Fort Collins, Colorado, told me internal agency studies had found the strategy questionable, and definitely ineffective in mice.”

“With the support of his CDC colleagues, Zeidner had begun to work with industry to develop an alternative: a form of injectable Doxy that could be sustained in the body for nineteen days.”

“Trying his formulation on mice, Zeidner found that 100 percent were protected from Lyme as well as the coinfection, anaplasmosis.”

“…..single dose doxy stopped Lyme disease not in 87% of mice, but rather, in 20 to 30 percent at most.”

_____________________________

Dr Gary Wormser of New York Medical College (who has controlled the Lyme disease narrative for the past three decades) published a study earlier promoting the use of single dose Doxy for tick bite. (See Wormser’s 2001 flawed NEJM article)

I understand that it was Wormser who called Zeidner’s superiors at the CDC to put an end to Zeidner’s work. Zeidner was told to discard the mice sera instead of testing for antibodies as he had promised.

Zeidner’s research was terminated for “lack of industrial support” Mead, and he was promoted, and his email address inactivated. The CDC stopped his research and sent him to Europe

I have attached Zeidner’s 2008 study for your review:

A sustained-release formulation of doxycycline hyclate (Atridox) prevents simultaneous infection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi transmitted by tick bite
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jc0h9g9arjhc8l1/Zeidner%202008.pdf?dl=0

Questions for LymeX prize competition winners:

Are all of you confident that the current pandemic was handled properly by our Public Health Officials? Was diagnostic testing controlled/manipulated in any way? Have lifesaving therapies been suppressed over pharmaceutical profits (vaccines)?

I ask the competition winners to be suspect of HHS oversight for this LymeX prize competition and if any dishonest/suspicious activity is experienced as described previously in this letter, please seek early legal counsel, (perhaps collectively) and involve your state senators to expose the ongoing corruption hell bent at maintaining the false thirty-year Lyme disease narrative: “Lyme is Hard to Catch and Easily Treated” (with a 2-4wk antibiotic treatment mandated by the Infectious Diseases Society of America)

Respectfully submitted,

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Cc: All LymeX prize competition winners, All members of the 2022 Tick-Borne Disease Working Group, the Steven & Alexandra Cohen Foundation

More examples of interference/manipulation as reported through the experience of a clinician on the front lines:

2018 ILADS Webinar – History of Lyme Disease by Joseph J. Burrascano, Jr. MD. (Video Recording)
https://vimeo.com/306846706  Summary:

Joseph Burrascano, MD’s cogent history of Lyme: East Hampton, Long Island NY had the highest rate of Lyme in the world. 1965 internist Sidney Robin coined the term “Montauk Knee”.

1985   87 seronegative patients all had spirochetes produced using Alan McDonald’s culture technique. “Seronegativity is real”

@7:00  re: PTLDS – “There’s never, ever, ever been a description of this Post Lyme Syndrome from an immunological point of view that clarifies what it is and applies to every single patient”.

@9.05 Stony Brook study of 21 day doxycycline “… had a 100% FAILURE RATE… THEY KICKED ME OUT OF THE STUDY AFTER THAT; AND THEY NEVER REPORTED THOSE RESULTS.”

@9.35 Patient Evaluation: “I took advantage of Dr. McDonald’s culture… after treatment ended, if you waited a few weeks, they [patients] were all culture positive. It was failed treatment and a persistence of the infection.”

@12.45  Late 1980’s “Rocephin came onto the scene… 100% failure rate of 2 weeks of Rocephin, even at high dose… Duration of treatment is really, really what’s important.” Findings presented @ 1990 Stockholm International Conference.

@13.50  633 patient records reviewed indicated at least 4 months treatment for those “with multiple bites, Lyme arthritis, heart murmurs, hormonally active women, those sick for more than 1 year, age over 60, acute carditis, documented immune deficiency, failed oral treatment.”

@26.50 Discovered on lecture circuit Dr. Ed Masters from MO, John Druhl, NJ & Paul Levy, San Francisco all independently concluded higher doses and longer treatment necessary. They’d never met or communicated previously.

1990 NIH Gold Stain – 73 chronic patients, 13.5 months mean treatments. Discovered blebs and biofilms.

@31.19 “So, whatever happened to this great gold stain? Know what? Nothing. NIH stopped the funding… closed the whole thing down and never again did they ask front line Lyme doctors to contribute specimens to their studies. So, there’s some politics one more time.”

@32.58 Co infections seem to affect only chronic Lyme patients.

@34.19 Lyme is the thing that takes over the immune system, weakens our defenses….

@36.52 Lyme is an immune suppressive illness….

@38.25 McDonald presented cultures at “… a meeting of NYS Medical Society… detractors were people from Yale and Stony Brook who didn’t want their patented serologic tests to be usurped, and they started claiming that McDonald was falsifying his data and so forth.”

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Testing, vaccines

Fauci aka “Mr. Science” Develops Selective Amnesia, Can’t Name Any Studies Showing Masks Work for COVID, & Suddenly Has An Open Mind to the Lab-Leak Theory

**UPDATE Feb. 2023**

“NO STUDY IN THE WORLD THAT SHOWS THAT MASKS WORK THAT WELL.”

  • Yet, despite a meta analysis and the admission by the White House COVID adviser, the CDC is the ONLY national or international public health agency that recommends masking two year old children.  Listen to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky ramble on and on with pure & utter nonsense.  In this important video, Dr. Prasad reads a statement from CDC director Rochelle Walensky and then states the following:

“She’s just making things up.  She’s good at making things up. She made up the fact that there’s credible data that we should mask kids between 2 and 5 even though UNICEF and the WHO said not to do that. She made that up.  She makes up lots of things, because she doesn’t actually use science to guide decision making, she just likes to make things up.” ~ Dr. Vinay Prasad  

Fauci’s deposition was just released.  Go here to read the 446 page document.

https://brownstone.org/articles/faucis-7-hour-deposition-what-we-know-so-far/

Fauci’s 7-Hour Deposition: What We Know So far

BY    NOVEMBER 27, 2022
(See link for article)
Summary:
  • Fauci is accused of colluding with Big Tech to suppress dissenters, violating the 1st Amendment
    • Dr. James Lyons-Weiler exposes 72 pages of emails proving collusion on the COVID narrative  (Scroll to minute 37 to hear Weiler)
    • The reason we have the emails are due to a FOIA request by a freelance journalist
    • Another FOIA request shows that while Fauci stated in the deposition he doesn’t have “time to worry about things like the Great Barrington Declaration,” he and Collins colluded with the media to shut it down by engaging in a smear campaign against the authors by calling them “fringe” scientists.  Sorry, but that took time.
  • Fauci knew the lab-leak theory had merit from the beginning but immediately discredited it,  despite it having less than a 1 in 100 million chance of having a natural origin
  • He defended lockdowns, masks, and school closures with very little evidence
    • Under oath, Fauci could not provide a single study showing masks are effective against COVID
    • The 1st randomized controlled trial of more than 6,000 people found surgical masks did not statistically significantly reduce incidence of COVID infection. Video of study here.
    • This recent study shows “close to null effect” of medical masks (10.46%) compared with fit-tested N95 respirators (9.27%) in more than 1,000 healthcare workers working directly with patients
    • Other data analyses support theses findings including Yinon Weiss’ work which shows that a states’ masks rules have nothing to do with infection rates.
    • Go here to see studies on the ineffectiveness of masks, as well as the dangers
    • Yet, tyrants are still pushing ineffective, dangerous masks – and still ignorantly suggesting them for children whom have essentially zero COVID risk
    • Medical rags like MedPage Today brag about costly yet ineffective hospital entrance screenings which resulted in 62,009 masks being given out (despite the fact they don’t work, yet they continue to insist that they do)
    • During the deposition, Fauci insisted a court reporter, who sneezed due to allergies, wear a mask even though nobody else did (Rules for thee but not for me)
  • Fauci et al. desire to emulate China’s zero-COVID, draconian lockdowns, even though they haven’t worked yet and they are being widely protested by utilizing incredible creativity to bypass censorship, which appears to be working.  Perhaps our “authorities” should have a chat with laypeople who actually live in China.
    • For example, here some poor, sorry sucker is being blamed for spreading COVID for simply taking a 30 minute jog in the park without a mask!  (Thank you, contact tracing)  Even the corrupt CDC states transmission is low outdoors, and this study shows probable aerosol transmission in patients who had no direct contact and lived on different floors, through the floors and walls of a QUARANTINE hotel.  Hello?
  • The WHO, WEF, world leaders, and other elite, unelected leaders want to emulate China in every way
    • “I’ve seen the future, and it is Wuhan.” ~ WHO report
  • Please read this detailed observation proving Fauci is a skillful liar (He’s had nearly 40 years to perfect his craft)
  • FUN FACT: Until very recently, Fauci’s daughter worked for Twitter
  • Fauci is an expert Wordsmith and refuses to discuss “gain of function” by objecting that the term is too broad to be defined
  • Fauci repeatedly claimed he “couldn’t recall” or “couldn’t remember,” and pretended he didn’t understand questions
  • Fauci repeatedly threw subordinates under the bus (Go here for mysterious “suicides” of scientists under Fauci)
  • Fauci argued HCQ was “dangerous,” had “toxic” side effects, and was ineffective in treating COVID, but couldn’t cite a single study to support his claim. He rejected the list of 371 studies showing effectiveness.

Category:

Activism, Treatment, Viruses