Medical Kidnapping As Patients Sacrified on the COVID Altar

September 2, 2021

**UPDATE  Jan. 2022** Hospitals are still mistreating patients:

An unvaxxed COVID patient is being flown to Texas after being denied life-saving care in Minnesota. The hospital made a decision to turn off his life-support allegedly because he was unvaccinated. Texas doctors were shocked at his condition and one stated he was the most undernourished patient he had ever seen.  http://GiveSendGo.com/Anne The family is accepting prayers and donations.

Meanwhile, severely ill patients who are allowed ivermectin survive.

The following article needs to be read with an understanding that according to Medpage people are suing hospitals for the right to use ivermectin. While the article predictably focuses on the vaccination status of patients, it should be focusing on the fact that ivermectin saved the lives of seriously ill COVID patients. 

The Chicago internist who administered ivermectin to Nurije Fype (the woman in this story) testified at a court hearing that Fype was weaned off a ventilator & discharged after receiving small amounts of ivermectin for 20 consecutive days. True to form, the ‘authorities that be’ say she may have recovered on her own. The CDC reiterates its warning to doctors that ivermectin is not authorized or approved by the FDA for the prevention or treatment of COVID, but they are quite happy the FDA approved the Pfizer COVID jab:

  • despite no oversight or control group receiving a placebo
  • when absolute risk is taken into account the “approved” Pfizer shot has an efficacy of just .84%
  • the Pfizer clinical trail study design warning against proximity and potential transmission of side effects of the “vaccine”
  • JFK and Dr. Nass state the FDA appears to be purposely tricking citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product due to the bizarre way it was approved
  • leaked Pfizer indemnification agreement issue gives Pfizer complete indemnity, gives the purchaser no way of canceling the contract, demands countries put up sovereign assets including bank reserves, military bases, embassy buildings and more as collateral, and admits that long-term effects & efficacy are not currently known and there may be adverse effects.
  • many are unaware the FDA never tests the very drugs/vaccines it approves and does no independent testing whatsoever. It relies solely on Big Pharma’s own tests on its own products!  Corruption is rife in this process.
Yet ivermectin, a drug on the WHO list of essential medicines that has been used for decades is now suddenly dangerous, yet has been proven again and again to work against COVID.  Think about that.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/hospitals-now-1-cause-of-death-medical-kidnapping-the-norm-as-patients-are-sacrificed-on-the-altar-of-covid/  13 Min Video Here (warning, bad language)

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Dr. Amandha Vollmer is a Naturopathic doctor based out of Canada, but provides education and and counseling for people outside of Canada as well, including the U.S. which I imagine is where most of her clients reside.

She published a video this week about the experiences of several of her clients being medically kidnapped in hospitals, and forced on to COVID protocols against their will, resulting in some of them dying.

Dr. Vollmer uses natural treatments to cure people, and is an expert on dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), having written a book about it. She also started a website last year called “The Big Virus Hoax.”

This is not the first time we are hearing about patients being murdered by COVID protocols, as this is now being reported all over the Internet while the Pharma-owned corporate media continues to promote the official COVID narrative that all these people are dying from COVID.

We can now safely conclude that hospitals and their financially incentivized COVID protocols are the #1 cause of deaths in the U.S.

This is not as big of a revelation as one may think, since the medical system itself admitted back in 2013 that hospital errors were the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S., just after cancer and heart disease, long before COVID arrived.

Hospitals medically kidnapping people and holding them against their will is nothing new either. I believe I was the first one to use the term “medical kidnap” publicly back in 2013, and shortly after that started a whole website devoted to the topic in 2014: MedicalKidnap.com.

We covered mostly stories of children being medically kidnapped from parents against their will and being put into the foster care child trafficking network, but we also covered some stories about adult medical kidnapping as well, which is actually a larger problem, long before COVID ever arrived on the scene.

While pre-COVID about a half million children were put into the foster care system nationwide, about three times that number of adults were medically kidnapped, with 1.3 million, mostly seniors, forced into state-appointed guardianships representing $50 billion of their assets seized by the State.

So the medical hospital system has been a criminal enterprise in the U.S. for a long time, and things are much worse now due to COVID protocols that are literally murdering people.

A few weeks ago, on August 8, 2021, we published an article with family horror stories where members of their family were killed in hospitals via COVID protocols. See:

Standard COVID Protocol Treatments Still Killing Patients in Hospitals – When will the Murders Stop?

We asked people to share their stories in the comments. Here are a few of them.

A 69 year old family member became dehydrated while alone in a different state. He went to the hospital (first mistake) where they insisted he take a Covid test. He declined but they insisted. The test was “positive “. He asked for Ivermectin. They said it doesn’t work and gave him Remdesivir and antibiotics. He said he didn’t want to be put on a ventilator. Long story short he ended up on one and died. His family was not allowed in to see him until he was dying. They asked for high dose vitamin c to be given and were told it doesn’t work. These hospitals are murdering people in my opinion. This man was a born again believer in the Lord Jesus Christ which is our great hope.

Get your Hydroxy Chloriquine and Ivermectin from Frontline Doctors. Take vitamin C and D and Zinc. Exercise and eat right. Be prepared for eternity. Fight for freedom! – Michelle Miller

My brother-in-law just died. He went to the hospital. Covid pneumonia they said. If we could have kept him home and given him IV & oxygen,he would have had a better chance. He was only 49. – Melanie

A really close family friend – who had been vaccinated both doses of Pfizer, used masks and implemented social-distancing protocols even within his home religiously – passed away around a month ago. It all started with a sudden, unexpected decrease of oxygen saturation. He was immediately admitted to a hospital. After a day or so, he got slightly better. But since the COVID protocols had to be followed, they kept him there and continued ‘treatment’. Eventually, his oxygen saturation decreased once again to alarming levels, and he was put on ventilator. He never came back.

A strikingly similar incident happened with my uncle – who was also fully vaccinated. He, too, passed away around 2 weeks ago.

The worst thing is that many doctors are either completely ignorant of the consequences of their ‘treatment’, or they ignore such warnings and incidents and deem them as ‘rumors’ or ‘myth’. Of course, they’re ‘just following the [medical dictators]’. My dad and brother are doctors, yet are completely brainwashed with the ‘religion’ which CDC, WHO, etc. etc. propagate. – I.M.

I am sooo very sorry to hear about this experience. My brother’s life was taken from him in this COVID rabid environment, which has no respect for life. I don’t know if had COVID, but he went to the hospital in an ambulance because he couldn’t walk. He said he was having nerve damage. He also said he was congested. Although he was perfectly coherent and talking, he was only in the hospital for two hours and he was dead. They reamed a ventilator down his throat because they said his oxygen levels were in the 80s. When they reamed the ventilator down his throat he let out two curdling screams and he was dead. I have since found out that there are non-invasive ventilators that they could use, such as high flow nasal cannulas, and helmet ventilators. They are much more humane and non-invasive. People need to know about alternatives to these invasive ventilators. – makemba007

For an insider perspective from within the system, here is a whistleblower board certified occupational therapist from Hawaii explaining the same thing. This testimony was published on our network on August 11, 2021, and his video has now been viewed over 350,000 times on our video channels.

____________________

**Comment**

Previously I told the true story of a local man who called EMS with suspected COVID. They showed up in hazmat suits and refused to touch him – telling him to “get himself on the gurney.”  He was taken to a local hospital where they admitted they had nothing for him and then put him on Medflight to a Madison hospital where he was offered a ventilator. Thankfully, he was read up on the the fact of ventilators causing more harm than good with COVID and declined.  The doctor looked down at him and said, “You’ll be dead in 5 days.”

Thankfully the man survived and lived to tell the tale.

These stories are common and pervasive.  This politicization of medicine needs to stop.  The corruption of public health ‘authorities‘ and institutions needs to stop.  Thousands are needlessly dying due to improper or no treatment, and doctors are being tyrannically censored, sanctioned and fired from their jobs for simply stating what is working. These corrupt ‘authorities’ keep repeating the mantra that the injections which aren’t vaccines are the only answer despite data and history showing exactly the opposite.

Category:

Uncategorized

Comments Off on Medical Kidnapping As Patients Sacrified on the COVID Altar

Why Are We Suddenly Rejecting Science By Forcing Vaccines on Absolutely Everyone? Asks The Hill’s Kim Iverson

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kim-iverson-rejecting-science-natural-immunity-forcing-vaccines

Why Are ‘We Suddenly Rejecting Science by Forcing Vaccines on Absolutely Everyone’? Asks The Hill’s Kim Iverson

Political commentator Kim Iverson says conventional science has always favored natural immunity when it comes to longer lasting and stronger protection against infection — so why are we now “suddenly rejecting science by forcing vaccines on absolutely everyone?”
Political commentator Kim Iverson points out on The Hill’s “Rising,” these new findings aren’t really 'bombshell' at all.

The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It’s free.

A bombshell new study shows natural immunity to COVID provides 13 times more protection against the Delta variant versus vaccination alone.

But as political commentator Kim Iverson points out on The Hill’s “Rising,” these new findings aren’t really “bombshell” at all.

Conventional science, she says, has always shown that past infection provides “robust immunity” against future reinfections.

“Why suddenly, after over 100 years of recognizing previous infection as a robust form of immunity,” Iverson asks, “are we suddenly rejecting science by forcing vaccines on absolutely everyone?”

In the largest real-world observational study, conducted in Israel — one of the most highly vaccinated countries in the world — scientists followed 700,000 people, splitting them into three groups: vaccinated people who received two doses of the Pfizer jab, unvaccinated people who recovered from COVID, and individuals who both recovered from the virus and received one dose the Pfizer vaccine.

The study found natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization.

“The researchers hypothesize that it’s because of B and T cell memory,” Iverson explained. “And the fact that people who recovered from the virus are exposed to the entire virus, not just the spike protein that the vaccines expose the body to.”

The study is yet to be peer-reviewed, she said, but the findings are consistent with other studies and public health data.

“For some strange, politicized reason,” said Iverson, “this scientific fact has been hotly debated in the U.S.”

For example, she explains:

“In the incidence of chickenpox, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends vaccination for those who haven’t had a previous infection. On their website, under the heading, ‘Who needs a chickenpox vaccine?’ the CDC says: ‘People 13 years of age and older who have never had chickenpox or received chickenpox vaccine should get two doses, at least 28 days apart.’

“Same thing for the measles, and even polio, if they are not combined with other vaccines. Even during the smallpox outbreak, when vaccines became mandated, the certificate of immunity clearly gives clearance for those who had previously recovered from smallpox.”

So, Iverson asks, why are world health officials ignoring the science of natural immunity?

“Are public health officials just caving to the demands of a frightened public?” Iverson wondered. “Are they caving to the desires of greedy Big Pharma?”

Iverson said:

“In the European Union, where some countries have implemented vaccine passports, people can obtain one by either showing proof of vaccination, testing negative for the virus within 72 hours, or through proof of recovery from previous infection.

“This is based on sound science. So, what is it that is causing this sudden rejection of widely accepted science here in the United States?

“We currently have colleges, corporations, Big Tech, politicians and U.S. public health officials, all openly excluding natural immunity as a basis for medical exemption.

“When recovered patients raise an eyebrow over policies mandating  they be vaccinated, their education, their livelihoods and their ability to participate in society are threatened.”

For example, Jeanna Norris, a supervisory administrative associate and fiscal officer at Michigan State University, who has natural immunity after recovering from the virus, sued the school over its vaccine mandate.

A judge, however, ruled against Norris on Tuesday, arguing that:

“… because Plaintiff does not have a constitutionally protected property interest in her employment position at MSU, and is not being denied any constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, nor is employment a fundamental right under the United States Constitution, this matter will receive rational basis scrutiny…

“And for Plaintiff to win under this standard of review, Plaintiff must show that MSU’s vaccine mandate is not rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest, i.e., the health and safety of the public. Plaintiff is unlikely to win under rational basis review. Therefore, at this stage, Plaintiff has not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.”

Todd Zywicki, a George Mason University law professor, recently filed a similar lawsuit against his employer requesting a medical exemption from the school’s vaccine mandate.

Zywicki argued that because he has natural immunity, “there’s no justification for a coercive violation of my bodily autonomy.” The university caved to the suit, awarding Zywicki the exemption last month.

As Iverson points out, the new data on natural immunity raises a “huge ethical question” about the demand to vaccinate the world, regardless of their previous infection status.

She said:

“The CDC estimates that over a third of all Americans have recovered from COVID. That means if the vaccines can even help us reach herd immunity, we only need 50% vaccinated to get us to a combined 80%.

“Currently the U.S. is reporting just over 55% fully vaccinated, but it would be interesting to know how many of those were previously infected in order to give us a true picture of how close we are to this believed threshold for herd immunity.

“This would be important data for us to know in order for us to find out if herd immunity is even possible with this virus.”

Luckily, countries like Israel are keeping good records, said Iverson.

“They have not politicized the virus,” she said. “They’re able to give better insights into what’s working and what isn’t.”

Iverson said she hopes this latest study showing natural immunity is the best protection will “finally change our current line of thinking.”

She makes clear no one is advocating for people to go out and get COVID. But the reality, she says, is that millions of people already had the virus, and many more will.

“The people who have recovered have robust immunity,” Iverson said. “That should be accepted, even studied by our society, as it always has, rather than shunned.”

Watch the “Rising” segment here:

Category:

research, vaccines, Viruses

Comments Off on Why Are We Suddenly Rejecting Science By Forcing Vaccines on Absolutely Everyone? Asks The Hill’s Kim Iverson

Donor Derived Ehrlichiosis Following Organ Transplantation

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab667/6331335?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Donor-derived ehrlichiosis: two clusters following solid organ transplantation

Aditi Saha, Charles Browning, Raja Dandamudi, Kevin Barton, Kevin Graepel, Madeline Cullity, Wala Abusalah, Du Christine, Carla Rossi, Naomi Drexler … Show more
Author Notes
Clinical Infectious Diseases, ciab667, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab667
Published: 30 July 2021

Abstract

Ehrlichiosis has been infrequently described as transmissible through organ transplantation. Two donor derived clusters of ehrlichiosis are described here. During the summer of 2020, two cases of ehrlichiosis were reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for investigation. Additional transplant centers were contacted to investigate similar illness in other recipients and samples were sent to CDC. Two kidney recipients from a common donor developed fatal ehrlichiosis-induced hemophagocytic lymphocytic histiocytosis (HLH). Two kidney recipients and a liver recipient from another common donor developed ehrlichiosis. All three were successfully treated.

Clinicians should consider donor-derived ehrlichiosis when evaluating recipients with fever early after transplantation after more common causes are ruled out, especially if the donor has epidemiological risk factors for infection. Suspected cases should be reported to the organ procurement organization (OPO) and the OPTN for further investigation by public health authorities.

______________________

For more:

Category:

Ehrlichiosis, research, Transmission

Comments Off on Donor Derived Ehrlichiosis Following Organ Transplantation

Let the Gaslighting & Stigmatization Stop Here

https://www.lymedisease.org/tbdwg-comment-lyme-leland/

TOUCHED BY LYME: Let the gaslighting and stigmatization stop here

The third panel of the federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group held its first meeting today–online. I was one of 10 people selected to deliver verbal comments. There was a three-minute time limit. Here’s what I said:

A topic not addressed by the first two Working Group panels is the severe impact Lyme disease can have on mental health.

A study recently published in the American Journal of Psychiatry shows that people with Lyme disease have a 75% higher risk of dying by suicide than those without it.

Lyme patients also have a high rate of other psychiatric conditions, such as depression.

Lead author Dr. Brian Fallon, of Columbia University, points out that Lyme is not a simple illness. He states: “In addition to the risk of severe cardiac, rheumatologic, and neurologic problems, Lyme disease can cause severe mental health problems as well.”

MyLymeData bears this out

Furthermore, results from the MyLymeData patient registry tell us that

  • 29% of Lyme patients surveyed say they have had severe psychiatric symptoms
  • 30% report that they take antidepressants—compared to 13% of the general population
  • 32% say they are too disabled to work. This situation leads many to despair.

When patients seek help from their physicians for debilitating symptoms, far too often, their doctors dismiss their concerns out of hand.

Doctors essentially say, “I don’t believe you. Your symptoms aren’t real.”

Some call this gaslighting. It undermines the patient’s self-confidence, and makes them doubt their own experiences.

Without treatment options, suffering people are left adrift in a sea of hopelessness.

Stigma of Lyme disease

Patients say the stigma surrounding Lyme disease profoundly affects them.

74 percent say they have been treated disrespectfully by a healthcare provider.

67 percent say they have postponed or avoided medical treatment due to discrimination, disrespect or difficulty obtaining care.

US News and World Report recently asked Lorraine Johnson, the head of LymeDisease.org, to comment on Dr. Fallon’s study of Lyme disease and suicide.

She said in part:

“We know that there’s a psychiatric component to what is going on, but I think [a major driver of] the increased suicide rates among patients with Lyme disease is that they are disbelieved, they are stigmatized, and they are gaslighted by physicians, by insurers, often by society and, sometimes, unfortunately, by their families.”

I urge this panel to listen to patients. Let the gaslighting and stigmatization stop here. Together, let’s work to change the system that deprives people with Lyme disease of the medical care they need to get well. Thank you.

TOUCHED BY LYME is written by Dorothy Kupcha Leland, LymeDisease.org’s Vice-president and Director of Communications. She is co-author of When Your Child Has Lyme Disease: A Parent’s Survival Guide. Contact her at dleland@lymedisease.org.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Psychological Aspects

Comments Off on Let the Gaslighting & Stigmatization Stop Here

Lies, Damned Lies, & Vaccine Statistics

September 1, 2021

https://drrollergator.substack.com/p/damned-lies-and-vaccine-statistics

Lies, Damned Lies, and Vaccine Statistics

Hyper-vigilant vaccination advocates are pushing dangerous misinformation about vaccine efficacy
     

Excerpts from article:

In the last few weeks I have seen evidence of articles more widely shared to correct some of the early misconceptions The Lancet correspondence was concerned about. However a more insidious form of misunderstanding and misinformation lingers, and is pervasive.

Twitter avatar for @DrTomFriedenDr. Tom Frieden @DrTomFrieden

It’s actually pretty simple math. If you get Covid and you’ve been vaccinated, you’re about 100 times less likely to die.

July 27th 2021

3,351 Retweets

Tom is no ordinary doctor. He is the former Director of the Center for Disease Control under President Barack Obama. He is also propagating dangerous misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccines. It will cause people to misunderstand the real world results which can cause more people to die, and exacerbate the pandemic.

Dr. Tom is wrong. About as wrong you can get. The real world data has shown that the death rate among the vaccinated, if infected with COVID, can be 3 to 5.7 times higher1 than the death rate of the unvaccinated.

The former Director of the CDC is making what I call an Acceptable Catastrophic Error. This is the kind of error one is allowed to make when they are perceived to have the correct opinion.  Arguments and statistics used towards the goal of getting every single person vaccinated for COVID are given far less scrutiny and are accepted as true more readily, than any arguments or statistics that might be perceived as counterproductive towards that goal.

When the former Director of the CDC, or anyone else for that matter, says someone who is infected with COVID is 100 times less likely to die if they have been vaccinated, it does not matter how far off that number is. It will be readily forgiven no matter how inaccurate. It is the goal of universal vaccination, not truth, that appears to be most important.

There are a lot of acceptable catastrophic errors.

(See link for article)

_____________________

**UPDATE, Sept. 8, 2021**

One of Bill Gates’ favorite books is, “How to Lie With Statistics.”

A guide to playing number games, which is exactly what is occurring in the world of COVID madness.

**Comment**

Very astutely written article.  This man thoroughly goes through the math and proves much of what we are being told is fatally flawed and dangerously misused.

Important quote:

When “former Director of the CDC” Dr. Tom and others use the non-infection efficacy numbers to discuss the vaccines, they are, intentionally or not, misleading the public. It is something that should end immediately.

With the exception of infection rates, the efficacy numbers convey no useful information to citizens about their risks once they have been vaccinated. Instead, it may cause the vaccinated to place themselves and others at greater risk if they operate on this misinformation.

When you are finally counting things and dividing things counted which matter, such as how many infected people went on to die in each group, no remnant of the 90% numbers remain. In the graph above6, there is no information available to suggest the death rate per infection is any different in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group. You can see why by revisiting the number infected and the number who died in each group

When looking at infection/case fatality rate in 45-64 year olds, the number actually lean towards a higher death rate among the “vaccinated.”

The author then goes on to warn that if you blame death after “vaccination” on the vaccine, you would be committing “post hoc ergo propter hoc” fallacy, which simply means just because B happened after A does not mean B was caused by A.  Pro-mass-vaccination advocates quickly point out this reasoning flaw to those blaming vaccines; however, the same error is committed daily by the pro-mass-vaccination crowd without any pressure to check their reasoning.

The author also states that data has not supported any observations that the “vaccine” gave people with break-through infections less severe cases.  This false idea has been repeated often.

The author states that not only is the death rate among the vaccinated and infected higher but it’s also higher for death and hospitalization than the unvaccinated and infected.  Israeli data shows these results ‘plain as day.’

For more:

In a July 1, 2021, commentary in The Lancet Microbe,3 Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele and Michel Vaillant also argue for the use of absolute risk reduction when discussing vaccine efficacy with the public. They too went through the calculations, coming up with the following:

  • Pfizer/BioNTech — Relative risk reduction: 95%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.84%
  • Moderna — Relative risk reduction: 94%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
  • Gamaleya (Sputnic V) — Relative risk reduction: 91%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.93%
  • Johnson & Johnson — Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
  • AstraZeneca/Oxford — Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.3%
These injections are abysmal at protecting you AND they do not provide immunity.  Dr. Bhakdi also refuses the narrative that they reduce severity of symptoms as was pointed out in the article.

Bhakdi states:

“They showed absolutely zero [benefit in the clinical trials],” he says. “This is the ridiculousness. People don’t understand that they’re being fooled and have been fooled all along.

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

Comments Off on Lies, Damned Lies, & Vaccine Statistics