https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1183344/full

REVIEW article

Front. Med., 24 May 2023
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy
Volume 10 – 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1183344

Lyme disease and the pursuit of a clinical cure

  • Division of Immunology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences, Covington, LA, United States

Lyme disease, caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common vector-borne illness in the United States. Many aspects of the disease are still topics of controversy within the scientific and medical communities. One particular point of debate is the etiology behind antibiotic treatment failure of a significant portion (10–30%) of Lyme disease patients. The condition in which patients with Lyme disease continue to experience a variety of symptoms months to years after the recommended antibiotic treatment is most recently referred to in the literature as post treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) or just simply post treatment Lyme disease (PTLD). The most commonly proposed mechanisms behind treatment failure include host autoimmune responses, long-term sequelae from the initial Borrelia infection, and persistence of the spirochete. The aims of this review will focus on the in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence that either validates or challenges these mechanisms, particularly with regard to the role of the immune response in disease and resolution of the infection. Next generation treatments and research into identifying biomarkers to predict treatment responses and outcomes for Lyme disease patients are also discussed. It is essential that definitions and guidelines for Lyme disease evolve with the research to translate diagnostic and therapeutic advances to patient care.

_________________

Translation:  TIME FOR CHANGE!

Thankfully the study authors point out the following:
  • Without intervention, Bb establishes a persistent/chronic infection in both its reservoir and non-reservoir hosts.  
  • Controversy regarding chronic infection revolves around whether Bb can persist after antibiotics and whether they are capable of causing the symptoms patients experience.
  • There are many bacterial species associated with persistent infections in humans including: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and B. burgdorferi (109).
  • Bacterial tolerance is different from resistance in that bacteria are not actively growing in the presence of the antibiotic and there is no heritable genetic change in the persistent bacteria’s genome (110, 111).
  • The stress response and other mechanisms allow bacteria, including Borrelia, to survive lethal conditions such as limited nutrients, extreme pH levels, and the presence of certain antibiotics.
  • Drug-induced bacterial persisters show a biphasic killing curve and the regrown persister cells have the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to the administered antibiotic as the original population but a higher minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (112).
  • Several independent studies have demonstrated that Bb can form drug-tolerant persister cell in vitro.
  • In vivo studies of Bb antibiotic persistence often use different parameters that can make comparisons between two or more studies difficult.
  • It is likely that lack of consensus of definitions and diagnosis lead to the treatment controversy.
  • Despite treatment controversy, a biostatistical review of the literature found that retreatment of LD with antibiotics may be beneficial in certain cases (163).
  • Since research for PTLD revolves around autoimmunity, immune-mediated factors, and/or persistent infection, most drugs fit into one of three categories: immune therapies, pathogen specific inhibitors, or antibiotics.
  • Studies screening drug libraries have revealed:
    • disulfiram has demonstrated borreliacidal activity both in vitro and in vivo (174–176)
    • vancomycin may have efficacy against stationary Bb based upon cultures and evaluation in SCID mice (177)
    • hygromycin A has shown efficacy against Bb, without disturbing the gut microbiome like so many broad-spectrum antibiotics, in vitro and in an in vivo mouse assay, but it’s use in preventing persistent infections was not determined (178)
    • drug combinations such as daptomycin or artemisinin, cefoperazone, and doxycycline as well as the combination sulfachlorpyridazine, daptomycin, and doxycycline have shown evidence of in vitro activity against Bb persisters and round bodied forms (117, 172). Azlocillin and cefotaxime are effective in in vitro killing against Bb persisters induced by doxycycline, which appear to be more tolerant to other antibiotics (179).
    • daptomycin or daunomycin, doxycycline, and cefuroxime have had success in sterilizing in vitro Bb biofilm-like microcolonies (180, 181).
    • dapsone, used in treatment of leprosy, has had success when combined with other antibiotics in killing biofilm-like Bb (182), and dapsone has had positive effects in a small PTLD and co-infection clinical study (183).
    • oregano, cinnamon bark, clove, and various flowers, grasses, and berries, as well as natural compounds such as those found in bee venom and its component melittin have demonstrated potential in vitro growth inhibition against Bb and its various forms (184–188) but need further research to determine the safety and efficacy of, and the composition and activity of the exact compounds found.
  • Curative treatment during early LD stages is a key to solving the current PTLD public health problem.
  • It is likely that more than one mechanism is involved in antibiotic treatment failure that leads to PTLD.
  • The current treatment guidelines are dependent upon the immune system’s ability to clear persistent spirochetes and conditional to the surviving spirochetes being non-viable and not enough to sustain a prolonged immune response.
  • In order to make PTLD a thing of the past, personalized medicine is required as well as the need to evolve and progress with scientific discoveries and innovations.  

https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mbio.00712-23

Powassan virus persistence after acute infection

Authors: 
6/20/23
Survivors of Powassan encephalitis often have persistent neurological disease. A new mouse model replicates some elements of the human disease and demonstrates the presence of viral RNA in the brain as well as myelitis more than 2 mo after the acute infection. The related tick-borne encephalitis and West Nile Neuroinvasive Disease (WNND) also have common neurological sequelae, and models for these better-studied diseases provide evidence for prolonged virus, RNA, and inflammation in some cases, in addition to damage from the acute encephalitic disease. A better understanding of the biological basis for persistent signs and symptoms after Powassan encephalitis, currently a rare disease, could benefit from further studies of the more prevalent flaviviral encephalitides.
________________
**Comment**
Unfortunately, the acknowledgment of this will be for a future lucrative vaccine – not treatments or things that will actually help patients.

Please note that Wisconsin is a hot-spot for Powassan.  Read this article on how Powassan IS NOT RARE, yet the CDC continues to state it is.

For more:

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/31708332

Insider article: A woman is trying out a 4-dose Lyme disease vaccine

Carl Tuttle

Hudson, NH, United States

JUN 28, 2023 — 

Please read the following complaint letter sent to the Insider regarding inaccurate information relating to Lyme vaccines.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “corrections@insider.com” <corrections@insider.com>
Cc: “hbrueck@businessinsider.com” <hbrueck@businessinsider.com>, “jhood@insider.com” <jhood@insider.com>, “hbeckler@insider.com” <hbeckler@insider.com>, “rzisser@insider.com” <rzisser@insider.com>, “cpreti@insider.com” <cpreti@insider.com>, “pdifiore@insider.com” <pdifiore@insider.com>, “information@axelspringer.de” <information@axelspringer.de>
Date: 06/28/2023 11:53 AM EDT
Subject: A woman is trying out a 4-dose Lyme disease vaccine as we approach the worst summer for ticks yet

Insider

A woman is trying out a 4-dose Lyme disease vaccine as we approach the worst summer for ticks yet
https://www.insider.com/lyme-vaccine-for-people-being-tested-across-us-europe-pfizer-2023-6

By Hilary Brueck  Jun 27, 2023

“Although studies showed it [LYMErix] was about 75% effective at stopping Lyme disease, it received a lukewarm public reception and was the subject of conspiracy-theory lawsuits, driving down sales and leading it to be quickly taken off the market.”

Insider
1 Liberty Plz Fl 8,
New York, New York, 10006

To: the management team at Insider,

I would like to register a complaint regarding the statement highlighted above. The following link will take you to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee’s January 31, 2001 meeting:
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting
Excerpt:

“The people who have contacted us were, prior to vaccination with LYMErix, healthy, active and energetic. Indeed, the very reason they sought the LYMErix vaccine was their desire to preserve their healthy, active lifestyle. However, what they experienced was a dramatic degradation of their health and quality of life. As will be described below, these previously healthy individuals are now afflicted with painful, at times debilitating arthritic symptoms, including joint pain and swelling, as well as extremely severe Lyme-disease-like symptoms which have persisted to this day.” 

Question: Does that sound like a conspiracy-theory?

Additional concerns:

There were neurological complications with the previous “OspA-Based” Lyme vaccine (LYMErix) as published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine. Reports of cerebral ischemia, transient Ischemic attacks, demyelinating events, optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and non-specific demyelinating conditions are evaluated in this paper. To my knowledge, there were no studies to determine why LYMErix caused these serious complications.

Neurological complications of vaccination with outer surface protein A (OspA)
https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-journal-of-risk-and-safety-in-medicine/jrs527

And we are to believe Pfizer will bring a “safe and effective” product to market? A company that paid the highest fine for health care fraud:

Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History
 
Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing (Wednesday, September 2, 2009)
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

A chronic relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the vaccine model so deny the chronically infected and your patents for vaccines and diagnostic technology continue to reap patent royalties as evidence of persistent infection (following the one-size-fits-all IDSA mandated treatment protocol) must be concealed/ignored at all costs.

In the interest of time I have shortened the evidence to five points below with most reference links taken from the NH COMMISSION TO STUDY TESTING FOR LYME AND OTHER TICK-BORNE DISEASES of which I was a member appointed by Governor Chris Sununu:

Barbara Johnson of the CDC put Advanced Laboratory Services out of business after the lab was reporting 80% positive culture results. If contamination was an issue as Johnson claimed,[i] why didn’t the CDC work with Advanced Laboratory Services to correct the problem? Culture is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of bacterial and fungal infections worldwide but when it threatens the existing paradigm suddenly it becomes “not particularly useful.” Johnson by the way filed her own patent  [ii] a year earlier for the detection, diagnosis and/or treatment of Lyme disease.

Dr. Sin Lee had been working with the CDC on a project to develop proficiency testing for his DNA sequencing-based tests for Lyme Borreliosis (Approved by the New York Dept. of Health) When Dr. Lee reported a case of chronic [iii] Lyme through Sanger sequencing suddenly all communication stopped. A positive DNA test is irrefutable evidence of active infection.

The CDC refuses to recognize the mountain of publications identifying persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment. A chronic relapsing seronegative disease should have set off a red flag but its misclassification as a simple “nuisance disease” has left hundreds of thousands if not millions worldwide in a debilitated state.

The CDC refuses to recognize the disabling stage of Lyme disease as reported by the Lyme patient population worldwide because it contradicts the CDC 30yr Official Narrative; “Lyme is hard to catch and easily treated with 2-4wks of antibiotics” Social Security disability compensation is denied leaving patients to fend for themselves.

Serology (Western blot) was manipulated to facilitate vaccine development. The two most significant bands, 31 (Outer surface protein A) and band 34 (Outer surface protein B) of the spirochete were removed as those who were vaccinated would test positive. Humans do not produce antibodies to Lyme disease for 4-6 weeks after a tick bite so serology has always been the wrong diagnostic tool but absolutely essential to deceptively prove vaccine efficacy.

Patent royalties and pharmaceutical profits [iv] over lifesaving care.

Unimaginable pain and suffering for the sake of a vaccine while our public health officials ignore the evidence that we are dealing with an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug.

Questions: Where is the outrage? Will any of these facts find their way into a revised article at the Insider or is the conspiracy-theory statement final? Who coached Hilary Brueck in the writing of her article?

A response to this complaint is requested.

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

To TBDWG: “The CDC has propagated a false Lyme disease narrative”
https://www.lymedisease.org/tuttle-tbdwg-false-narrative/

Re: Lyme borreliosis: diagnosis and management (Published letter to the editor of the BMJ)
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

Additional References

[i] Assessment of New Culture Method for Detection of Borrelia Species from Serum of Lyme Disease Patients

Barbara J. B. Johnson, Mark A. Pilgard, and Theresa M. Russell
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957795/

[ii] COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATING TO LYME DISEASE
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2013110026A1/en?oq=ininventor:%22Barbara+J.B.+JOHNSON%22

[iii] Lyme disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi with two homeologous 16S rRNA genes: a case report

Johnson Patent
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27186082/

[iv] Valneva Receives FDA Fast Track Designation for its Lyme Disease Vaccine Candidate VLA15
https://valneva.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2017_07_24_VLA_Lyme_FDA_Fast_track_PR_EN.pdf

____________________

**Comment**

It is clear Brueck was coached from one of many in the Lyme Cabal.  Proof the Lyme narrative is being controlled:

  • Cabalist Gary Wormser has developed diagnostics for Pfizer’s Lyme “vaccine” trial.  The man continues to use taxpayer money to propagate the ongoing Lyme narrative.
  • Cabalist Dr. Mark Klempner calls LYMErix’s removal a “tragedy.” Please know the backstory on Klempner, which includes a history with biological weapons as both director and investigator of a bioweapons lab, accusations of research fraud, and his single-handedly convincing mainstream medicine that extended treatment won’t help Lyme/MSIDS patients. The infamous “Klempner” trial has ruled Lyme-land for over 20 years.  Klempner was also the trial administrator of the Connaught OspA Lyme vaccine in the 1990s, and is quite aware of the adverse effects of injecting OspA into people, yet despite all of this, he  was an author of the 2006 IDSA Lyme Treatment “Guidelines” that were the subject of an investigation by Senator Richard Blumenthal which exposed undisclosed financial conflicts in many of the panelists as well as the fact they simply ignored alternative medical opinion (which is happening again with COVID). Those guidelines relied heavily on his 2001 “retreatment” study in which most of the participants had not been treated in the first place.  He claims his new shot isn’t a “vaccine;” however, according to this,  OspA is still in it. Here’s what Dr. Stricker has to say about OspA: 

Another Lyme OspA Vaccine Whitewash

The meta-analysis by Zhao and colleagues comes to the conclusion that “the OspA vaccine against Lyme disease is safe and its immunogenicity and efficacy have been verified.” The authors arrive at this sunny conclusion by excluding 99.6% of published articles that demonstrate potential problems with the OspA vaccine. Furthermore, the authors ignore peer-reviewed studies, FDA regulatory meetings and legal proceedings that point to major problems with OspA vaccine safety (1-3). This whitewash bodes ill for future Lyme vaccine candidates because it fosters disregard for vaccine safety among Lyme vaccine manufacturers and mistrust among potential Lyme vaccinees.

  • Cabalist Sam Telford teaches biosecurity, specializes in the bioweapon Tularemia, and was the director of a bio-level 3 lab in Groton, Massachusetts that works on dangerous, tickborne diseases on the government’s select agent list.  He’s funded by the NIH and the military-industrial complex but dismisses all concerns of biowarfare research and spends his time bad-mouthing doctors who dare to defy the narrative. He laments and blames a rotavirus vaccine for children that was demonstrated to actually do harm added to the growing anti-vaccine sentiment around the same time of Lymerix, making us question if the man has a heart in his body at all or is merely stuffed with straw.
  • Cabalist Linden Hu, recruited by Klempner, is a professor of Microbiology and Basic Science at Tufts Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and is fixated on the ever lucrative vaccine-infused mouse food which contains a virus what he insists is safe.  Thankfully the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture is leery.  He has also proposed putting an antibiotic into mouse food at bait stations. The science it’s all based on was done more than a decade ago. This project was also stalled due to fears of antibiotic resistance.  Given the appropriate title of the “crazy man” of Lyme disease, he is leading NIH funded studies to investigate feeding live ticks on people as a diagnostic test and releasing genetically altered viruses to prevent disease in the animals in the wild.  His laboratory works with leading pharmaceutical companies in the development of vaccines and other approaches to prevent human Lyme disease.  Hu and Telford just received nearly 4 MILLION from the NIH to study a more narrow-spectrum antibiotic.
I’m having flash-backs of childhood cartoons of mad scientists that want to rule the world.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/crimean-congo-hemorrhagic-fever-uk-cchf-symptoms  News Video Here

Deadly tickborne virus that’s spreading in Europe ‘likely to reach UK’

Climate change is causing infectious ticks to move north in Europe, expert warns
Andy Gregory

July, 17 2023

A virus with a fatality rate of 30 per cent that is spreading in Europe will almost certainly reach the UK, an expert has warned.

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a disease caused by a tickborne virus, categorised as one of the nine “priority diseases” deemed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to “pose the greatest public health risk due to their epidemic potential”.

The virus causes sudden symptoms of fever, dizziness, pain in the head, neck, back and eyes, and sensitivity to light…. (See link for article)

_______________

SUMMARY:

http://  Approx. 11 Min

Fears of New Lockdowns

Go here if Youtube censors the video

July 17, 2023

  • CCHF is transmitted via ticks but can also be spread from livestock to humans as well as less commonly via human to human transmission by percutaneous and per mucosal exposure to blood and other body fluids containing the virus – typically in the hospital setting.
  • The research article discussed within the video states a higher mortality rate of 40-60% than the article above.
  • Interestingly, death occurs as the result of multi-organ failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), circulatory shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, accompanied by a systemic inflammatory reaction – all of which are being seen due to the COVID injections often due to the fact the shots set people up for COVID due to ADE.
  • Despite any proof, headlines singularly blame “climate change” for CCHF which conveniently promotes the corrupt WHO’s agenda.  A recent report in fact states there is ‘no evidence’ of a climate emergency.
  • Virologist Geert Vanden Bossche states that those who are COVID vaccinated are incubating omicron-derived variants. He believes those who will NOT be at risk for serious disease are the unvaccinated, and those who have received a placebo. He predicts that those who have had two or more COVID shots are at the greatest risk for “vaccine” break-through infection and he highly recommends they have access to antivirals.  He predicts that by late summer – early autumn we will see more and more deaths due to autoimmune disease and cancer which will be followed by a substantial wave of hyper-acute COVID disease in the highly “vaccinated.”

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-great-covid-laundering-scheme/

The Great Covid Laundering Scheme

The CDC seems to have been systematically swapping in Covid as the Underlying Cause of Death on death certificates listing a different condition as the UCoD.

To briefly recap what we’ve covered in previous articles, the CDC applies medical diagnostic codes from the ICD-10 database for all conditions listed as a CoD on death certificates.

The thesis explores how the CDC has been systematically misclassifying covid as the UCoD on death certificates that clearly list a different condition as the Underlying Cause of Death, or where covid was obviously not the UCoD even if it was technically listed in the position of the UCoD by the coroner or ME who filled out the death certificate. The CDC does this by entering the ICD code for covid – U07.1 – as the UCoD even though the death certificate itself lists a different condition as the UCoD.

To be clear, this isn’t meant to capture coroners adding covid as a CoD where covid clearly was clinically irrelevant. Rather, what I am highlighting is a subset of “covid” deaths where the CDC swapped in covid as the UCoD even though it wasn’t documented as the UCoD on the death certificate by the coroner/ME.

In other words, potentially an enterprise of systemic out-and-out fraud by the CDC to falsely portray deaths that at best covid ‘helped’ hasten the demise of the decedent as deaths where the death was primarily instigated by covid.   (See link for article)

https://brownstone.org/articles/cdc-altered-death-certificates/

CDC Altered Minnesota Death Certificates that List a Covid Vaccine as a Cause of Death

Someone (who needs to remain anonymous) was able to obtain the death certificates from Minnesota for all deaths that occurred from 2015 to the present, which presented the opportunity to see if the CDC is being entirely honest about the US death data. Unsurprisingly, the CDC is not.

As we shall document, the CDC is concealing references to a covid vaccine on Minnesota death certificates (that are exceedingly rare to begin with because of widespread medical establishment denialism of vaccine adverse side effects). In almost every death certificate that identifies a covid vaccine as a cause of death, the CDC committed data fraud by not assigning the ICD 10 code for vaccine side effects to the causes of death listed on the death certificate.

Background

When someone dies, there is a death certificate that is filled out for official/legal purposes. Death certificates contain a lot of information (some states include more than others), including the causes of death (CoD).

Causes of death refer to the medical conditions that ultimately played some role in the demise of the decedent. To qualify as a CoD, a condition only needs to contribute to the medical decline of the decedent in some way, but doesn’t have to be directly responsible for whatever ultimately killed the person. If someone had high blood pressure, and subsequently suffered a heart attack that led to cardiac arrest which killed them, all three conditions qualify as CoD. On the other hand, this unfortunate fellow’s ingrown toenail is not a cause of death, because it in no way contributed to their demise.

(See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

  • It’s the CDC’s job to assign ICD (International Classification of Diseases) 10 codes via  a secret algorithm, with only a tiny percentage adjudicated by CDC staff.
  • While there are codes for literally every random bizarre thing you can think of, there are only TWO codes given for COVID shot side effects.
  • The article gives 7 examples of death certificates from Minnesota of those who died within hours to days that identify the COVID shot as a cause of death but the CDC fraudulently omitted the ICD 10 code.
  • It is noteworthy that the average age of the decedents is 80, and 7/9 died before May 2021, a time of maximum prejudice against acknowledging the shots can trigger lethal pathologies.  Young people “dying suddenly” sticks out but the death of the old and frail receives much less attention and is simply blamed on age.

There are many inherent problems with CDC death statistics:

  • hospitals were paid to count deaths as COVID even when there were confounding issues and COVID wasn’t the direct cause of death.
  • infant deaths due to vaccines are never listed on death certificates but are listed as SIDS due to the lack of an ICD code,  Without a code, it simply doesn’t exist and therefore can not be tracked or numbered.
  • has been described as a “circular mortality rate generating system” that regurgitates the same causes of death over and over due to the fact doctors provide the simplest natural cause as they know it will quickly pass the approval of the local registrar’s office. This means any hope of capturing deaths caused by or complicated by a vaccine or drug is lost and enables deaths caused by Big Pharma to remain unnoticed and uncounted.
  • similarly to fraudulent testing which is controlled and patented by the CDC, the agency’s domination of coding also allows them to control the narrative.