Recognition of the fact that bacterial biofilm may play a role in the pathogenesis of disease has led to an increased focus on identifying diseases that may be biofilm-related. Biofilm infections are typically chronic in nature, as biofilm-residing bacteria can be resilient to both the immune system, antibiotics, and other treatments. This is a comprehensive review describing biofilm diseases in the auditory, the cardiovascular, the digestive, the integumentary, the reproductive, the respiratory, and the urinary system. In most cases reviewed, the biofilms were identified through various imaging technics, in addition to other study approaches. The current knowledge on how biofilm may contribute to the pathogenesis of disease indicates a number of different mechanisms. This spans from biofilm being a mere reservoir of pathogenic bacteria, to playing a more active role, e.g., by contributing to inflammation. Observations also indicate that biofilm does not exclusively occur extracellularly, but may also be formed inside living cells. Furthermore, the presence of biofilm may contribute to development of cancer. In conclusion, this review shows that biofilm is part of many, probably most chronic infections. This is important knowledge for development of effective treatment strategies for such infections.
Over 2,000 pages show that the ‘pandemic’ was all fraud. Highlights:
‘High health risk’ was not derived from data, but a political decision.
The upgrading of the risk from ‘moderate’ to ‘high’ was the legal basis for all COVID measures and all courts that rejected lawsuits brought by those affected invoked it.
‘Herd immunity’ was seen as a mere narrative.
RKI questioned the effectiveness of FFP2 masks stating there is no evidence for their use outside of occupational health and safety but RKI vigorously advocated mask and vaccine mandates and discrimination of the unvaccinated.
The German government bought hundreds of millions of masks at high cost and politicians received thousands of dollars helping bring the deals about.
The reports show it was known that the flu kills more people and that those who died of COVID already exceeded most life expectancies.
Negative consequences of lockdowns were known but ignored. The government still issued lockdowns and school closures.
The ‘pandemic’ was never about science.
RKI-Files are internal protocols of Germany’s Federal Health Agency. They were obtained through legal action under the Freedom of Information Act. The files show that politicians ordered the experts to make up stories and narratives so as to support the government’s preconceived measures.
There is currently a critical debate in Germany about the minutes of the Robert Koch Institute from the coronavirus era (archive image).
(Bild: AFP/ANDRE PAIN)
The protocols of the Robert Koch Institute, the so-called RKI files, are currently the subject of controversial discussion online. The German institution had a coronavirus crisis team that discussed the measures in the country and shared its assessments with the German government. The minutes from January 2020 to April 2021 are now publicly available …
Journalist Paul Schreyer had filed a lawsuit for the documents, which are more than 200 pages long in total, citing the Freedom of Information Act. They can now be accessed on the blog “Multipolar”.
The Robert Koch Institute, which drew up the protocols, is based in Berlin and deals with the detection, prevention and fight against infectious diseases. In the context of coronavirus, the team’s expert assessment was crucial for measures such as the lockdown. Another example is the shortening of the recovery status after a Covid-19 infection from six to three months (beginning of 2022). (See link for article)
______________
Comment:
an estimated thousand passages, such as certain names, were conveniently blacked out by the RKI.
“Multipolar” has filed another lawsuit, and the next hearing is scheduled for May.
Senate Resolution 81 and ‘No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act’ Rots in Committee
Congress is simply doing lip-service in protecting the public from global tyrants while the Biden Administration is all in to have our rights taken away.
Without intervention, we hand over our rights to the WHO to do the following:
Define the next pandemic
Determine lockdowns
Surveillance power
Determine treatments
Vaccine Mandates
Vaccine distribution
Vaccine IP and profits
Redistribution of …..everything – all resources.
The Louisiana Senate has passed legislation (SB 133) to make the state independent from directives and mandates that originate from international institutions including the WHO, UN, and WEF. It states that the WHO, UN, and WEF shall have no jurisdiction or power within the state of Louisiana. No rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate of any kind of the WHO, UN, and the WEF shall be enforced or implemented by the state of Louisiana or any agency, department, board, commission, political subdivision, governmental entity of the state, parish, municipality, or any other political entity. It now needs to be passed by the House of Representatives and signed into law by the governor.
The anti-commandeering doctrine, under the U.S. Constitution’s Tenth Amendment, holds that the federal government cannot commandeer state and local resources for its own purposes, it follows that international bodies would not be able to either.
“We have watched a horror story unfold in front of us as time has shown that the ‘recommendations’ and coercive regulations from outside organizations such as the WHO have harmed hundreds of thousands of Americans who took a vaccine that they were told was safe and effective. Now, we are witnessing severe, long-term side effects and countless deaths because the ‘experts’ were wrong.” ~ Louisiana State Senator Valarie Hodges
The video also reviews history of how internal documents show the corrupt WHO paid sexual abuse victims in the Congo $250 each to cover up their crimes.
Relax for a few minutes, sit back, and pretend morals and business ethics are redundant. Then imagine an infallible, risk-free business scheme in which you get to create the market, decide the product, manage its regulation, then have the power to confine people to their homes or remove their income until they submit to buying it. And no one can sue you or take you to court if it all goes wrong.
No legitimate government would allow that within its borders (except perhaps a few family-run or completely totalitarian ones), so aim higher and make this international, as it then ceases to be fantasy. All this is beingnegotiated within the WHO pandemicdocuments to be agreed by your government in two months’ time.
So, imagine:
Your organization will be a public-private partnership, so using taxpayer money but guided by the private sector.
You spin a story that a series of plagues are about to engulf humanity, exponentially increasing in frequency and severity (your partners own the media, so don’t be troubled by reality).
Then use public money to set up a surveillance network guaranteed to find virus variants (i.e. go and find nature, you can’t miss it).
Governments have agreed ahead of time to give you power to control healthcare policy when you decide these variants pose a threat (not harm, just a threat). They have agreed that this includes border closures, restrictions on daily life of their citizens, and of course mandated vaccination (in return for them ‘getting freedom back’).
Then transfer these virus variants to laboratories and pharmaceutical companies of your choice (your friends and supporters, who will in return give your organization some money).
The pharmaceutical companies are ready: They have been receiving free billions from taxpayers annually under the same scheme, to keep their production lines ready to profit from the market you are about to create.
Your Pharma-investor sponsors also sponsor disease modelers willing to produce the most fantastic death figures to shore up public compliance. They do this.
You then use your powers to impose these lockdowns and insist that a 100-day vaccine must be rushed out to save hapless humanity and allow a return to an “inter-pandemic” period.
Once your chosen companies rush out the vaccine, you get to control the regulatory bit (more money changes hands), bypassing pesky safety trials and those interminable ethics reviews.
All the while, you can note any dissenting opinions that may reduce your market size; your governmental partners having already agreed to deal with them.
Once you have the profit flowing, you get to decide when the profiteering can stop(think “respiratory virus vaccine” and more sponsored modeling – rapid waning of efficacy so lots of boosters to keep humanity safe).
All the while, you have ensured freedom from liability for your pharma partners and your own regulatory process.
You, of course, have no liability either – you are above any national jurisdiction. You don’t even have to pay tax to anyone!
Within this article you will learn of the egregious violations of human rights that have occurred historically in medical research. Many state Lyme disease falls into this category as well.
COVID is a perfect example of how these experiments have shaped current ethic standards – or lack there of.
“They serve as a grim reminder of what can occur when ethical considerations are sidelined for the sake of scientific inquiry or under the guise of political and racial ideologies…..these best practices appear to have all but been forgotten by Vaccine Manufacturers and Public Health.” ~ James Lyons Weiler
In short, a recent Guardian article spotlights Australia’s the Doherty Clinical Trials (DCT), a new facility dedicated to human challenge trials designed to expedite the understanding of diseases and the development of vaccines and treatments by intentionally exposing consenting participants to infectious agents or pathogens in a controlled environment.
The trials, which focus on a variety of diseases, from influenza to malaria and gonorrhea, involve compensating volunteers, typically young adults and travelers, for their participation – demonstrating enticement to consent and potential long-term health impacts.
The article points out glaring problems:
lab leaks
generation of more virulent or resistant strains of pathogens
the rapid deployment and approval of dangerous gene therapy injections falsely labeled as ‘vaccines’
the deliberate exploitation of socioeconomic vulnerabilities through financial enticement on populations already marginalized by the healthcare system
risk of long-term chronic illnesses due to the long-term impacts of pathogen exposure – known as pathogenic priming
repeated exposures to infection and then injection will likely cause autoimmunity as history has shown
Weiler calls for a ban on human challenge trials which is rooted in the principle of “first, do no harm,” a cornerstone of medical ethics that appears to be all but forgotten.
The incidence of Lyme disease (LD) infections has risen in recent decades. Gestational LD has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, the results have been contradictory. The study objective was to examine the effects of gestational LD on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
Methods
Using the Healthcare Cost & Utilization Project National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from the United States, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients admitted to the hospital between 2016 and 2019. The exposed group consisted of pregnant patients with gestational LD infection (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] code A692x), while the comparison group consisted of pregnant patients without gestational LD. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for baseline maternal characteristics, were used to determine the associations between gestational LD and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
Results
The cohort included 2 ,943, 575 women, 226 of whom were diagnosed with LD during pregnancy. The incidence of LD was 7.67 per 100, 000 pregnancy admissions. The incidence of gestational LD was stable over the study period. Pregnant patients with LD were more likely white, older, to have private health insurance, and to belong to a higher income quartile. Gestational LD was associated with an increased risk of placental abruption (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.45 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.53–7.80]) and preterm birth (aOR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.03–2.42]).
Conclusion
Gestational LD is associated with a higher risk of placental abruption and preterm birth. Pregnancies complicated by LD, while associated with a higher risk of certain adverse outcomes, can be followed in most healthcare settings.
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/11/gestational-lyme-other-tick-borne-diseases-dr-jones/A retrospective study showed 480 children with gestational Lyme/MSIDS. Diagnosis was based on clinical physical and history. Two cases of in vitro fertilization caused embryonic infection. Gustafason & Burgess demonstrated gestational Bb infection in dogs. Of the inoculated bitches, 80% became infected who then birthed mostly infected pups.
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/16/why-do-officials-continue-to-deny-gestational-lyme/Lyme disease is an infectious disease which is not only zoonotic (tick transmission) but has been proven and even documented by Canadian Federal Health authorities to be transferred from human-to-human, mother to child. There are also valid concerns that this disease could be transmitted sexually and through the blood supply.
The hard tick, Ixodes keiransi Beati, Nava, Venzal, & Guglielmone, formerly the North American lineage of Ixodes affinis Neumann, is expanding its range northward along the US East Coast. In July 2023, we collected I. keiransi adult female and nymph in a single sampling event, suggesting its range now includes southern New Jersey. In this area, I. keiransi is sympatric with northern populations of Ixodes scapularis Say (Acari: Ixodidae), the primary vector of Lyme disease. Given its status as an enzootic vector of spirochaetes in the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex, proper differentiation of these 2 species will be critical for accurate estimates of entomological risk. Targeted surveillance should be implemented to monitor further I. keiransi expansion and to elucidate the phenology and enzootic role of this and other understudied Ixodes spp. in the northeastern United States.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 