Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Paper on Successful HCQ Use for COVID

https://drlf.substack.com/p/new-paper-the-use-of-hydroxychloroquine?

New paper: The use of hydroxychloroquine in multidrug protocols for SARS-CoV-2

I am pleased to announce that we have recently published a comment paper in the Tasman Medical Journal in response to an editorial review by the journal’s Editor-In-Chief concerning  the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19. Despite expressing disagreement with the editorial, the Editor has been genuinely interested in publishing a robust academic debate. His handling of our manuscript was very professional and meticulous.

The study concisely reviews previously published work, so there are no new major results presented. However, the importance of this study is that it provides a very concise statement of what should have been widely known and understood, by now, about pandemic response and specifically about the Raoult and Zelenko hydroxychloroquine-based multidrug protocols.

Some of the key points that we make are as follows:

  1. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) require large sample sizes to ensure sufficient randomization.  RCTs with insufficient randomization cannot claim superiority over retrospective observational controlled studies.
  2. There was sufficient evidence to justify the continuation of hydroxychloroquine-based multidrug treatments on an emergency basis by the end of April 2020, contrary to the claims of French regulators, currently preoccupied with persecuting Dr. Didier Raoult.
  3. By December 2020, the evidence was sufficiently strong that there was no longer equipoise to ethically justify any randomized controlled trials against placebo. The crossover point for the failure of equipoise, based on Zelenko’s data, was during June 2020.

We concluded the study with the following observations:

It is our interpretation that hydroxychloroquine played an important role in preventing hospitalizations and deaths due to COVID-19, particularly in 2020 with the more virulent strains. Widespread use of nasal sprays and gargles, aspirin, vitamin D, ivermectin, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, favipiravir, colchicine, corticosteroids, and anticoagulants in protocols all contributed to the benefits of early treatment which were widely favored over therapeutic nihilism in the pre-hospital phase. In case of a future pandemic, involving a novel disease, doctors should be encouraged to attempt treatments with repurposed medications based on biological plausibility, signals of benefit, and acceptable safety.  Article 37 of the 2013 Helsinki declaration allows the use of unproven treatments if “proven interventions do not exist or other known interventions have been ineffective” and the unproven treatment “offers hope of saving life, reestablishing health or alleviating suffering”. When these efforts result in case series of treated patients that show a large magnitude of benefit, then statistical comparison with historical controls can be used to support the strength of association between treatment and improved outcomes.  As evidence accumulates, the Bradford Hill criteria framework can be used to assess the support for a causality claim, as an inference to the best explanation. This evidence can be gathered rapidly and form the basis for an agile emergency response to future pandemics, if public health is willing to leverage the clinical experience of medical doctors at the front lines.

(See link for article and references)

_______________

**Comment**

Anyone dissing ivermectin, HCQ, vitamin D, nasal sprays & gargles, vitamin C, and other immune supports for respiratory illnesses and pushing an ineffective but dangerously toxic mRNA gene therapy has their head in the sand and is beyond reason.

Don’t listen to them.

‘Vaccines’ & Harmful Intent

The ineffective yet deadly gene therapy COVID clot shots with at least 55 undeclared chemical elements, including several toxins, have and continue to maim and kill.

In fact, there have been up to 15 MILLION deaths and 60 MILLION disabilities globally.
Further, ALL recombinant vaccines and adjuvants are now implicated in the DNA scandal.

The researchers who recently discovered the undeclared elements have deduced:

“The clues seem to be pointing to some kind of worldwide technological experimentation.” (brief 5 min video by independent journalist Greg Reese which explains)

While the COVID ‘plandemic’ was the excuse used to inject billions with a mysterious cocktail of untested and unproven nanotechnology, the silver lining appears to be that people are beginning to wake up from the nightmare. 

Now, due to deaths increasing 7-fold, a town in Western Australia supports a ban on mRNA products and is calling on the Australian government to implement a ban, and the Slovak government is calling for a ban of ‘dangerous’ mRNA ‘vaccines.’  Source

Mod-RNA technology, what it should be called, has exposed three-quarters of humanity to an unacceptable risk,” Plothe said. “Unfortunately, this risk has now materialized into around 20 million deaths and uncounted numbers of cardiological, immunological, neurological and oncogenic ‘side effects.’” ~ Christof Plothe, D.O. and member of the World Council for Health‘s steering committee

Every government leader worldwide should be banning these products.
Now a government report admits AIDS is surging among the COVID vaxxed.

Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine which may have been true immediately after ‘vaccination,’ however, not only do they lose efficacy over time down to ZERO, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficacy is reached.

But the human experiment is far, far older than COVID.  Dr. Richard Fleming has recently penned Are We the Next Endangered Species and highlights the fact eugenics has long been a part of a globalist scheme.  This plan has included sterilization, bioweapons, and vaccines. Many state COVID shots are all three.

Graphs from The Dissolving Illusions graphical website, which is so threatening to the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex it has been hacked several times and redirects to a Chinese firm, show reductions in disease and mortality due to improved sanitation, living conditions, etc BEFORE the introduction of vaccination.

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova states that while we’re told that “vaccines” work by giving us a small amount of a toxic substance, allowing us to create immunity against future infections, it’s been known since 1913 that what the injections actually do is make us vulnerable to said toxins. Furthermore, “vaccines” prime our bodies to react badly to *anything* that’s injected into us, including benign substances like milk or egg proteins. Hence the proliferation of allergies, such as allergies to milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, etc.

“It’s impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it…because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment.” “It’s the most ingenious way of poisoning,” ~ Sasha Latypova 

Thousands of mRNA manufacturing plants are slated to be built on every continent with the ability to produce billions of doses of gene-manipulation material.  The mRNA products which hijack the body’s machinery continue to roll out despite any logic, science, or truth.  The reason for this goes back to 2012 when the DOD ADEPT PROTECT P3 program which stated the US will use mRNA vaccines to end pandemics in 60 days.

Well, how’s that going?

It’s not, but that won’t stop the plan from continuing.

If you are new to the ‘vaccine’ debate, start here.  Then go here, and here. Learn that doctors get financial kick-backs for peddling them, despite the fact they receive very little ‘vaccine’ education – approximately enough to understand the package inserts.  Then, go on to learn that corrupt public health ‘authorities’ have patents on many vaccines and have been mislabeling ‘vaccination’ deaths for 50 years.  Infants that die after ‘vaccination’ are labeled SIDS as there is no ICD code for a ‘vax’ death

SIDS continues to be the leading cause of death among infants.

_______________

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/harmful-intent-for-vaccines-a-review?

Harmful Intent For Vaccines: A Review

Covid and 9/11 made people further suspect they’re being lied to about childhood injections (Updated 10/16/24)

An October 2024 Substack article entitled Here are The True Intentions Behind Vaccinations! posits reasons vaccines are strongly coerced and mandated in developed nations without full informed consent, placebo-controlled safety testing, or manufacturer liability.

These reasons might relate to the absurd demand you obtain a religious exemption to avoid potentially deadly shots. (See link for article, crucial short video about vaccines from Dr. McCullough, and six studies showing unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated ones.)

Also, watch this McCullough interview with Dr. Ken Stoller who has written the recent book Incurable Us Why the Best Medical Research Does Not Make it into Clinical Practice. In his book, Stoller also explains how to treat some of the most worrisome diseases and conditions afflicting humans today—including Lyme disease, brain trauma, dementia, and autism.  (See link for article)

_____________

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1821639041336651899?t=NCaOuzkczbiCgS4IHOhTKg&s=19

‘Vaccine’ Schedule A 100-Year Bluff

“[The ‘vaccine’ schedule] has been a one-hundred-year bluff...The head of the Nigerian vaccine program says, ‘I need to know if I put this cocktail of vaccines in one little body…the cocktail is safe and effective.’ [But they had] nothing. The whole thing is an empty hand.” Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the @ChildrensHD series Financial Rebellion how the entire “vaccine” schedule is based on a “one-hundred-year bluff.”

Fitts notes in the clip [in above link] that when Heidi Larson, an anthropologist from London, was tasked with figuring out what was behind so-called “vaccine hesitancy,” she found that “the families and the family physicians want[ed] scientific proof that vaccines are safe and effective, and there [was] none.” Furthermore, Fitts notes that there are no studies supporting the safety and efficacy of giving multiple “vaccines” to a child simultaneously, at one time. (See link for video)

https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/no-placebo-101823.pdf

Vaccine chart shows:  Not a single routine childhood vaccine was licensed based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial. Not one. 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-report-childhood-vaccines-saved-million-lives-outdated-statistics/

‘Laughable’: Experts Rip CDC Report Claiming Childhood Vaccines Saved 1.1 Million Lives

Experts interviewed by The Defender said the CDC relied on outdated disease and mortality statistics that led to “laughable” conclusions and ignored the real costs of adverse effects of vaccination.

 
“The methods are shoddy, the data are untethered from reality and the conclusions are a preposterous fiction,” Toby Rogers, Ph.D., a fellow at the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research, told The Defender. “This study is an advertisement on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry and it should be treated as such.”

“None of the vaccines available through the Vaccines for Children Program are as effective as the CDC claims,” Rogers said. “We know that the mumps portion of MMR does not work. The pertussis portion of DTaP does not stop infection nor transmission of pertussis. That’s true for lots of vaccines on the schedule.”

Rogers said it is well-documented in books like “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History,” by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk, that there were 90% to 100% reductions across all childhood infectious diseases before the introduction of mass vaccination campaigns.

The CDC report came out one day after Gallup released a poll finding fewer Americans today consider childhood vaccines to be important, with only 40% saying it is extremely important for parents to have their children vaccinated, down from 58% in 2019 and 64% in 2001.

The poll also found that only a slim majority — 51% — of Americans think the government ought to mandate vaccines.

https://rumble.com/v53i62f-childhood-vax-schedule-is-continuation-of-genocide.html  Video Here

The childhood vaccination schedule, pushed by CDC and pediatricians is a continuation of the mass genocide operation and should be dismantled. FOUR shots begin BEFORE BIRTH and total 200 by age 18, many repeated with NO SCIENTIFIC justificationDr. Jane Ruby is an American scientist, medical professional, and commentator. You can follow her Substack at https://su

________________

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-all-vaccines-cause-harm?

Why Do All Vaccines Cause Harm?

An explanation of the zeta potential concept

Story at a Glance:

  • Vaccines often cause various side effects, making it hard to identify common causes. Neurologist Andrew Moulden discovered that vaccines frequently trigger microstrokes, which can lead to a myriad of acute and chronic diseases.
  • Forgotten research from the 1960s, shows that blood cell clumping is a root cause of many diseases—a belief also shared by Chinese Medicine.
  • Colloidal chemistry and zeta potential science reveal that positive charges around blood cells cause clumping. Agents with concentrated positive charges, such as aluminum and the COVID spike protein, are especially problematic.
  • Improving the physiologic zeta potential benefits a wide range of acute and chronic illnesses. A strong case can be made that many conventional and holistic therapies work in part by enhancing zeta potential.

Note: this is an abridged version of an article I previously published here. Since I receive many questions on this topic and readers wanted an concise version of it, I worked to distill it down to its key points so this topic could easily be shared with others.  (See link for article)

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/what-is-vaccine-ideology-where-did?  Video here  (Fast forward to 12:15 to hear the history of ‘vaccine’ ideology)

What is Vaccine Ideology? Where Did it Come From?

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

RSV is a very mild infection in about half of kids under age one.  We are seeing an ‘explosion’ in cases because they are now testing for it.  Now they are pushing vaccines to women in their 3rd trimester for the first time ever to theoretically pass antibodies onto their babies.  The entire ‘problem’ has been fabricated.

We discuss the origins of vaccine ideology and cite the work by Roman Bystrianyk and Dr. Suzanne Humphries, Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History which is a historical accounting of the development of vaccines and how early versions of products had serious safety and efficacy issues. Instead of pausing, investigation, and improvement, with each new vaccine including smallpox, polio, measles, etc, there was an authoritarian posture taken by the public health agencies and medical establishment that everyone had to take a shot and vaccine serious adverse events and deaths were incurred and considered as part of delivering the public good. Essentially vaccine ideology in medicine is like a set of religious beliefs taken on faith, not on evidence. (See link for article and video)

________________

https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/thinking-of-taking-a-flu-shot-read?

Thinking of taking a flu shot? Read this first…

It’s not just that they’re ineffective, they also cause harm. Learn about safe alternatives such as Vitamin D, quercetin and zinc.

If you’re of a certain age or demographic and in the northern hemisphere, chances are you’re being invited or encouraged to get a flu vaccine. The claim is that flu vaccines protect you and others from coming down with flu – and that if you do get it, the symptoms will be mild. So, is this true?

Many scientists see the flu shot as an unnecessary measure. For one thing, there’s a big question over whether the flu vaccine even works, particularly for older people, for whom it is recommended. Studies show that the vaccines often do not match the circulating viruses and no significant effects on serious complications or hospitalizations have been demonstrated.

You’d think that vaccinating people against flu would lead to a reduction in deaths from flu. But figures show that this isn’t the case. In fact, even though the number of flu shots given has increased more than eightfold, the number of flu-associated deaths has remained more or less unchanged.  (See link for article)

Important excerpt:

  • In 2020, Anderson et al. showed that influenza vaccination of 60 to 70 year olds in England and Wales had no discernible positive impact on hospitalization or deaths:

  • Another study in Japan reported on 83,146 individuals aged 65 years and followed them up over six years. In 2023, the incidence of hospitalization for influenza did not differ significantly by vaccination and the claimed protective effectiveness against incidence waned quickly after four or five months.

  • Another 2020 study from Anderson and team analysed data covering 170 million episodes of care and 7.6 million deaths. Turning 65 was associated with a statistically and clinically significant increase in rate of seasonal influenza vaccination. However, no evidence indicated that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or mortality among elderly persons. The study points out that estimates were precise enough to rule out results from many previous studies.

  • Controlled studies published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) find that people who receive flu shots emit 630% more flu virus particles into the air compared to non-vaccinated people. In other words, flu vaccines spread the flu!

The FDA just halted the Novavax trial of the combo COVID-Flu ‘vaccine’ citing patient with nerve damage.  Of course Novavax denies, denies, denies it all.  Dr. Meryl Nass told The Defender there have been other recent drug trials in which participants suffered serious adverse events similar to the one reported by Novavax today — yet the trials were allowed to continue, and the drugs were approved.

For example, in the adult RSV trials for Pfizer’s Abrysvo, two participants were diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome. In GSK’s Arexvy vaccine trial, there was one reported case of Guillain-Barré and one death, both of which the FDA found to be potentially linked to the vaccine

Novavax will just have to pay a wad of money to have the FDA reverse their decision.

For more:  

 
 
 
 

We Will Never Forget: ‘Pandemic” Was Used To Frighten and Control Us

‘https://dailysceptic.org/2024/10/10/no-we-will-never-forget-what-you-did-to-us-in-covid/

No, We Will Never Forget What You Did to Us in Covid

In a recent piece in the New York Times, Dr. Rachel Bedard – who specialises in “medicine and criminal justice” – said the world needs to move on from the whole Covid catastrophe, the pandemic response, the wholesale destruction of liberties.

In complaining about the possibility that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will be appointed by a – horrors! – potential Donald Trump administration, she had this to say:

The COVID-19 pandemic was a divisive crisis for Americans. I worry that appointing Mr. Kennedy to a top health job would entrench the maddening, counterproductive, personality-driven dynamics that have dominated the politics of health and medicine for the first half of this decade, especially post-Covid. …

The future will surely bring both predictable and unforeseen public health crises that will require cool, experienced, nonpartisan leadership. Should Mr. Kennedy be appointed to the federal Government, he is unlikely to use his power to turn down the temperature. We should learn from what the pandemic revealed about our culture’s deep divisions. If Mr. Kennedy is in the administration, I fear we never will.

Arrogance aside, Bedard’s opinion piece screams enforced forgetfulness. While she may claim her position is about being able to “learn” from the pandemic, her statements belie that.

Her version of learning is about learning how to trust the public health complex that lied to the world for four – and counting – years about the dangers, origins and potential treatments for Covid.

Bedard does admit that much politics was played and that maybe kinda sorta the pronouncements from the likes of Anthony Fauci were too “prescriptive” rather than “persuasive”, which is the best way to handle discussions in the midst of any public health crisis.

She says RFK Jr.’s pronouncements are about power rather the necessary “nuance” needed and he is therefore unfit for office.

One assumes one can replace “nuance” with “I was just following orders”, but, either way, Bedard whitewashes fault and then – for purely pejorative reasons – goes into a tangent about raw milk.  (See link for article)

______________

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/sen-ron-johnson-pandemic-was-used#media-

Sen. Ron Johnson: Pandemic Was Used to Frighten and Control the Public on a Global Scale

“Fortunately, what happened during the pandemic opened the eyes of untold numbers of people around the world…”

Source: TruthAboutCOVID

Sen. Ron Johnson: “[The Coronavirus “pandemic”] was used to frighten and control the public on a global scale.”

“The result was a stunning loss of life and freedom for individuals, trillions of dollars of economic devastation, but billions of dollars of profit—and the accumulation of enormous power—for those in control.”

“Fortunately, what happened during the pandemic opened the eyes of untold numbers of people around the world to the corruption and capture of government agencies, the media, medical journals and the medical establishment, by large corporate interests.”

“Now that our eyes have been opened to that reality, it is impossible to ignore that the same dynamic has occurred throughout governments and industries worldwide.” ~ Senator Ron Johnson, Wisconsin

Full Video: “American Health and Nutrition: A Second Opinion: https://rumble.com/v5fy7bv-american-health-and-nutrition-a-second-opinion.html

_______________

**Comment**

The top article points out that Bedard uses a common tactic by intentionally lumping various types of ‘officially designated-crazy people’ together and casting a divisive light upon them.  You know – those people.  The crazy people who are out of touch.

This tactic is deployed to stop all argument, debate, and discussion and it’s quite effective for many people.

Bedard isn’t the first to use this tactic or to ask the world to simply have selective amnesia for one of the most unbelievable times of tyranny and censorship in current U.S. history.  Some health ‘experts’ and Brown University economist Emily Oster have also asked for amnesty because according to her, “everyone tried their best, no one did anything intentionally bad, we now know better, we’re not bad people, we didn’t really know”.

However, ‘mistakes were not made.’

There is much, much proof that the ‘pandemic’ was planned with purpose. An elite group of people at Event 201 planned for this loss of freedom and medical apartheid, and medical ‘experts’ allowed myths to pervade for years despite all known science – which caused untold numbers to die or suffer with life-long health issues.

The article rightly points out the massive degradation of education, the economy, children’s social skills, public trust in institutions, civil liberties, relationships due to massive polarization, health, careers due to censorship and persecution, and direct hardships caused by ‘vaccine’ mandates, leaving thousands maimed or dead.

Further, the fast-tracked COVID shots were not tested for the very things they were told to have and are filled with toxic contaminants that are known to cause human disease.  We were lied to repeatedly, and continue to be lied to.

The truth is, COVID was a massive scandal that we will perhaps never know the entire truth about.

Meanwhile Oster not only kept her job, she became famous.  Bureaucrats, multinational companies, putative experts, the national security-industrial complex, and the mindless media and internet scolds also did quite well.

It was not good for people. ~ Thomas Buckley, former Mayor of Lake Elsinore, CA and former newspaper reporter.

The ‘Remdesivir Papers’: NIH COVID Panel Learned Zilch & 12 Policies Must Be Changed For Health Freedom

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/remdesivir-papers-drug-military-members-941-deaths/?

‘Remdesivir Papers’ Allege Controversial Drug Used to Treat Service Members Led to 601 Deaths

A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing that the military began “liberally” administering remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 — months before the FDA approved the drug.

remdesivir bottle and stack of files

A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing 601 deaths of military service members and a high rate of serious adverse events in clinical trials involving remdesivir, an antiviral commonly administered to COVID-19 patients during the pandemic.

According to “The Remdesivir Papers,” some clinical trials were improperly run. In the case of at least one study, results were never made public. The whistleblower also alleged a widespread lack of informed consent for trial participants.

“Data derived from the Department of Defense [DOD] Joint Trauma System … by a military whistleblower offers a stark contrast to results of multiple clinical trials involving the liberal usage of remdesivir in military treatment facilities and other civilian facilities, as well as its potential contribution to, at minimum, hundreds of untimely deaths,” the documents state.

Yet according to the documents, the military began “liberally” administering remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 — months before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug.

The whistleblower, known by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay, shared the documents with investigative journalist J.M. Phelps, who published them last week in The Gateway Pundit.

In interviews with The Defender, LeMay and Phelps discussed the documents and their significance.  (See link for article)

Important excerpt:

Former victims of the COVID-19 hospital protocols, which included administration of remdesivir, and advocates for those victims welcomed the documents’ release.

________________

**Comment**

This needs to go public. Public officials need to be held to account for the fraudulent ‘trials’ of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine in order to preclude their use, making remdesivir the standard of care despite the obvious data showing that it kills people.  More whistleblowers need to come forward.

Gulick et al, published a “lessons learned” paper in Annals of Internal Medicine and missed the point entirely regarding ivermectin which exceeded all other drugs. Doctors and patients are finding success with ivermectin in combination with other nutraceuticals and drugs.  To make matters worse, the NIH guidelines advised against using ivermectin, which impeded doctors on the front line who found it effective and a part of community standard of care.

I highly recommend reading COVID ‘vaccine’ science catching up with ‘conspiracy theorists.’  Important excerpt:

Of course, while the science is starting to catch up, and the lawsuits are continuing apace (source), we’re still being told by our governments and mainstream media to roll up our sleeves, even those of us as young as 6 months. Source and source.

Okay then.

I’m with Dr. Vinay Prasad who once again candidly reiterates ‘mistakes were not made,’ and there should be no amnesty for COVID tyrants who are still lying.

Not only are they still lying, untold numbers of doctors have been persecuted by The Machine for simply doing their jobs and treating people.  Many lost their medical licenses and can no longer practice medicine.  This too has not been admitted or rectified by The Establishment.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/12-policies-need-change-true-health-freedom/?

These 12 Policies Need to Change If We Want True Health Freedom

In a free and moral society, health freedom is not simply a convenience — it’s an imperative.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
statue of liberty and hand holding stethoscope

As a requirement for discussing and appreciating the imperative of health freedom in the U.S., we must first define what is meant by health freedom.

A simple definition is the right of every American to decide what medical interventions to put into or onto one’s body, the right to access and use the medical and healing modalities of one’s choice, the right to maintain one’s health according to one’s conscience and the right to live free of involuntary medication be it via the food supply, the water supply or something airborne.

In a free and moral society, health freedom is not simply a convenience; it’s an imperative.

In this vein, in the event of injury or illness, all Americans must possess the absolute right to choose what medical interventions and treatments to accept and what medical or healing modalities to utilize in order to address illness or injury; Americans must be free to choose how to maintain their health whether that be through nutrition, supplements, herbs, drugs or a myriad of healing modalities; Americans must have access to truthful information regarding how the seeds for plants and animal feed and the food in our food supply has been grown or developed, medicated, processed and packaged; and Americans have the right to exist in a society free of water and airborne medications, insect vectors and chemicals.

Health freedom can only exist in a free and moral society that values each and every member of that society. This prerequisite thus excludes medical mandates of any kind. It is immoral to force another individual to risk their life for the theoretical benefit of another.

Moreover, the government does not have the moral authority or power to dictate what medical products any American puts into or on his or her body. If anyone in government does possess that power, then no American is truly free, nor does he or she possess any meaningful right whatsoever — Americans are merely chattel.

In order to create a society based on true health freedom, the following policy shifts should be implemented, as a first step. There are many more changes that should be implemented as well, but these proposals would address some of the most glaring, pernicious anti-liberty and anti-health aspects of our system as it exists today:

1. Ban all medical mandates

The Declaration of Independence states, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Medical mandates are prima facie violations of our founding documents.

Health freedom demands prior voluntary informed consent before a medical treatment or intervention is administered. Medical mandates are thus, by definition, antithetical to voluntary consent and therefore must be prohibited in a free and moral society.

No single individual in government knows the medical history of any American, knows what is best for Americans, or has to live with the repercussions of any choices made by Americans, thus, medical mandates are never justified in any circumstance.

2. Repeal the Bayh-Dole Act

“The Bayh-Dole Act, formerly known as the Patent and Trademark Act Amendments, is a federal law enacted in 1980 that enables universities, nonprofit research institutions and small businesses to own, patent and commercialize inventions developed under federally funded research programs within their organizations.”

Under this program, government scientists may receive up to $150,000 per year on their patents.

In theory, Bayh-Dole incentivizes bright scientists to seek employment at federal health agencies rather than entering more lucrative private industry by allowing these taxpayer-funded scientists and other individuals and entities to retain the patent rights to intellectual property developed during their taxpayer-funded research and development activities.

In practice, this Act forever realigned the interests of taxpayer-funded scientists away from the American people and toward their own interests and profits and the profits of the private industries with which they collaborate.

Dr. Anthony Fauci and his team at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases infamously owned half of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine patent which incentivized the misguided COVID-19-era policies leading to a colossal violation of the rights of Americans demonstrating the perverse incentives created by Bayh-Dole and the necessity of repealing the act.

3. Repeal the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of 1992

“The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) was created by Congress in 1992 and authorizes FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] to collect user fees from persons that submit certain human drug applications for review or that are named in approved applications as the sponsor of certain prescription drug products. Since the passage of PDUFA, user fees have played an important role in expediting the drug review and approval process.”

In 2022 alone, the pharmaceutical industry paid $2.9 billion in user fees amounting to 46% of the FDA’s entire budget including $1.4 billion or 66% for their drug approvers’ salaries and $197 million or 43% of the biologics (vaccines) program budget.

As a direct consequence of PDUFA, the FDA has a vested interest aligned with the profits and success of the pharmaceutical industry rather than the health and well-being of the American people.

4. Repeal the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) which authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to issue a PREP Act declaration.

“The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims:

    • of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions
    • determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency
    • to entities and individuals involved in the development, manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of such countermeasures

“A PREP Act declaration is specifically for the purpose of providing immunity from liability, and is different from, and not dependent on, other emergency declarations.”

The PREP Act desecrates the ethical principle of informed consent by protecting individuals from liability even when they expressly act contrary to patients’ wishes and instructions and must be repealed.

5. Repeal the Affordable Care Act

The Affordable Care Act anchors Americans to the pharmaceutical and drug-based medical paradigm even though a majority of Americans used at least one form of “alternative” medicine in 2021 and spent $30.6 billion in out-of-pocket expenses for those holistic medicine services in 2023 according to Statista.

Instead, implement a health savings program that permits Americans to access the health and medical modalities of their choice which in turn would foster more competition and reduce the exorbitant healthcare costs in the U.S. by breaking the extant monopolies held by the medical and insurance industries.

6. Repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA)

NCVIA shields vaccine makers from liability (except for willful misconduct), creating a perverse incentive to industry to develop a never-ending stream of vaccines which are then mandated by the states.

Further, the NCVIA protects industry and vaccine programs by creating a separate administrative federal court structure lacking due process and discovery, managed by “Special Masters” instead of judges, all in violation of the constitutionally protected right to due process.

While NCVIA contains other provisions designed to protect American families and ensure the safety of the national vaccine supply, Congress is not conducting proper oversight and the promises made in 1986 at the time of the Act’s passage have not been upheld.

As such, Americans who have been injured or killed by vaccines are left with astronomical medical bills and to fend for themselves.

7. Prohibit private donations to government entities

Prohibit private individuals, foundations, corporations, contractors and any other person or entity from donating or otherwise giving money to any agency or entity of the federal government.

The FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accept money from private actors such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Pfizer, thus skewing the interests of the agency in favor of these private actors and away from the American public.

Gates has collaborated with the FDA and the CDC Foundation takes money from the pharmaceutical industry whose products the CDC is responsible for monitoring for safety.

8. Cooling-off period for senior federal employees

Enact a five-year cooling-off period before which agency leadership, deputies and other key officials may depart federal agencies in order to enter the companies they regulate in the private sector.

9. Prevent conflicts of interest

Eliminate conflict-of-interest waivers so that no person serving on a health agency committee, board or other regulatory entity may have a conflict of interest. Disclosure of conflicts of interest is insufficient to ensure the agencies pursue the interests of the American people. Individuals with financial or ideological conflicts of interest should not serve as decision-makers in any capacity.

10. Prohibit government grants to nonprofits

Prohibit the government from allocating taxpayer dollars to nonprofits. Nonprofits exists to serve the public interests and should be funded directly by American citizens. If a nonprofit has a worthwhile mission, the public will gladly support it.

Government exists to protect our rights and should not be in the business of picking winners and losers nor should it be using third parties to pursue policies outside the reach and review of the public.

11. Ban water fluoridation

While water fluoridation programs are widespread, they are not only dangerous from a health standpoint, they are forced medication in violation of the ethical principle of informed consent.

Research comparing the health outcomes and IQs of communities that do and do not fluoridate their water supply reveals that children in the fluoridated water communities have reduced IQs and therefore inferior prospects in life. Other research has documented the health hazards of fluoride, an industrial waste product.

In addition, as fluoride is added to municipal water supplies, residents of those communities have no way to opt out and therefore are subjected to involuntary forced medication. No one should be forced to consume drugged water in order to maintain a biological necessity.

12. Ban the release of genetically modified insects

Two tenets of good health are abundant exposure to sunshine and fresh air; however, in some states, the state governments have collaborated with private businesses to release genetically modified mosquitoes into communities.

While these mosquitoes are often designed to breed with one another and eliminate the dangerous species going forward, the health impacts of humans being bitten by these insects are not well understood. Nor should a person have to risk being bitten by one of these creatures in order to venture outside. This amounts to a form of forced medication absent any form of consent and must be ended.

These recommendations should be understood as necessary first steps to begin correcting the disastrous health policy environment that exists in the U.S. today and to restore true health freedom in the U.S., which would allow all Americans to decide what medical interventions to allow into or onto one’s body, which health and medical modalities to utilize in maintaining their health and the ability to live free of involuntary medication be it via the food supply, the water supply or the air we breathe.

Originally published by Brownstone Institute.

Leslie Manookian is the president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund. She is a former successful Wall Street business executive. Her career in finance took her from New York to London with Goldman Sachs. She later became director of Alliance Capital in London running their European growth portfolio management and research businesses.

COVID Resistance After Paxlovid Not Found With Ivermectin or HCQ

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2824050?#google_vignette

Abstract

Importance  Previous studies have identified mutations in SARS-CoV-2 strains that confer resistance to nirmatrelvir, yet how often this resistance arises and its association with posttreatment virologic rebound is not well understood.

Objective  To examine the prevalence of emergent antiviral resistance after nirmatrelvir treatment and its association with virologic rebound.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study enrolled outpatient adults with acute COVID-19 infection from May 2021 to October 2023. Participants were divided into those who received antiviral therapy and those who did not. The study was conducted at a multicenter health care system in Boston, Massachusetts.

Exposure  Treatment regimen, including none, nirmatrelvir (paxlovid), and remdesivir.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was emergent SARS-CoV-2 antiviral resistance, defined as the detection of antiviral resistance mutations, which were not present at baseline, were previously associated with decreased antiviral efficacy, and emerged during or after completion of a participant’s treatment. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect low frequency mutations down to 1% of the total viral population.

Results  Overall, 156 participants (114 female [73.1%]; median [IQR] age, 56 [38-69] years) were included. Compared with 63 untreated individuals, the 79 who received nirmatrelvir were older and more commonly immunosuppressed. After sequencing viral RNA from participants’ anterior nasal swabs, nirmatrelvir resistance mutations were detected in 9 individuals who received nirmatrelvir (11.4%) compared with 2 of those who did not (3.2%) (P = .09). Among the individuals treated with nirmatrelvir, those who were immunosuppressed had the highest frequency of resistance emergence (5 of 22 [22.7%]), significantly greater than untreated individuals (2 of 63 [3.1%]) (P = .01). Similar rates of nirmatrelvir resistance were found in those who had virologic rebound (3 of 23 [13.0%]) vs those who did not (6 of 56 [10.7%]) (P = .86). Most of these mutations (10 of 11 [90.9%]) were detected at low frequencies (<20% of viral population) and reverted to the wild type at subsequent time points. Emerging remdesivir resistance mutations were only detected in immunosuppressed individuals (2 of 14 [14.3%]) but were similarly low frequency and transient. Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data analysis showed no evidence of increased nirmatrelvir resistance in the United States after the authorization of nirmatrelvir.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this cohort study of 156 participants, treatment-emergent nirmatrelvir resistance mutations were commonly detected, especially in individuals who were immunosuppressed. However, these mutations were generally present at low frequencies and were transient in nature, suggesting a low risk for the spread of nirmatrelvir resistance in the community with the current variants and drug usage patterns.

_______________

No such resistence has been seen using ivermectin and HCQ.

http://

Functional Pharmacist Analyzes Ivermectin 2024 Update

Dr. Dan Zatarski explains the mechanism of actions of Ivermectin. He reviews the discovery of ivermectin and helps to illustrate the use of ivermectin compared to penicillin.

https://justusrhope.substack.com/p/topical-ivermectin-and-fenbendazole?

Topical Ivermectin & Fenbendazole for Cancer & Disease

Multiple Case Reports & Before and After Photos