Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

COVID Injections For Children -‘Unnecessary, Ineffective, and Unsafe’

For a refresher, please see this 5 minute video on the absolute fear mongering of COVID in children.  The truth is deaths from COVID are ‘incredibly rare’  which has a mortality of .000002%. for children. 

Newly released data show that not a single healthy young person under the age of 50 has died from COVID in Israel, ever.

There is also absolutely ZERO evidence to support the complete myth that the asymptomatic are transmitting the virus to others.  Up until COVID, healthy people have never been quarantined, and a literature review and meta-analysis shows that lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID mortality.  

http:// Approx. 2 Min

The Lies of COVID Shot Effectiveness

https://doctors4covidethics.org/expert-evidence-regarding-comirnaty-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-for-children/

Expert evidence regarding Comirnaty (Pfizer) COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine for children

Documents

Michael Palmer MD, Sucharit Bhakdi MD, Stefan Hockertz PhD

The expert statement was submitted by Italian lawyer Renate Holzeisen to the European General Court in conjunction with a lawsuit that challenges the EU’s authorization of the use of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine on children of 12 years and older. The arguments made here specifically reference the Pfizer vaccine, but they apply similarly to the Moderna mRNA vaccine, and many also apply to the adenovector-based AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) vaccines.

Permission is hereby granted to freely share and distribute this document in unchanged form.

Expert Evidence: Pfizer Vaccine in ChildrenDownload

About the authors

Michael Palmer MD is Associate Professor in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. He studied Medicine and Medical Microbiology in Germany and has taught Biochemistry since 2001 in Canada. His focus is on Pharmacology, metabolism, biological membranes and computer programming, with an experimental research focus on bacterial toxins and antibiotics (Daptomycin). He has written a textbook on Biochemical Pharmacology.

Sucharit Bhakdi MD is Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and Former Chair at the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz.

Stefan Hockertz is Professor of Toxicology and Pharmacology, a European registered Toxicologist and Specialist in Immunology and Immunotoxicology. He is CEO of tpi consult GmbH.

All three are founding signatories of Doctors for Covid Ethics

__________________

For more:

Vaccinated children were significantly more likely than unvaccinated children to be diagnosed with severe allergies (OR = 4.31, 95% CI 1.67 – 11.1), autism (OR = 5.03, 95% CI 1.64 – 15.5), gastrointestinal disorders (OR = 13.8, 95% CI 5.85 – 32.5), asthma (OR = 17.6, 95% CI 6.94 – 44.4), ADHD (OR = 20.8, 95% CI 4.74 – 91.2), and chronic ear infections (OR = 27.8, 95% CI 9.56 – 80.8). Vaccinated children were less likely to be diagnosed with chickenpox (OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.029 – 0.36). Children who were “vaccinated and not breastfed” or “vaccinated and delivered via cesarean section” had the highest rates of adverse health outcomes. In this study, higher ORs were observed within the vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups for several adverse health conditions. Further research is essential to understand the full scope of health effects associated with childhood vaccination.

Despite CDC’s efforts at suppression, independent scientists and research institutions (including UCLA) have managed to conduct and publish several additional vaccinated/unvaccinated studies since 1999. Those studies indicate high incidence of chronic diseases and brain and immune system injuries among vaccinated compared to unvaccinated cohorts. Some of those studies are summarized in this presentation.

**UPDATE July 15, 2021**

In an unprecedented totalitarian move, an advisory put out by the U.S. Surgeon General is recommending that Big Tech companies (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc) impose consequences for accounts that violate the private companies’ own policies.  In other words the government is telling privately owned companies what to do – particularly with regard to what they call ‘misinformation’, defined as ‘information that is false, inaccurate, or misleading according to the best available evidence.’

In case you missed it, Big Tech has already been censoring and shutting down accounts that disagree with what the government is peddling, which includes their own ineffective treatments and injections they erroneously call “vaccines.” Even scientific journals have been engaging in a massive disinformation campaign.

It’s been discovered that “fact-checkers” also have conflicts of interest. This Face-book fact-checker worked for the Wuhan Lab. Google funded the Wuhan Lab.

Our own government is guilty of ‘misinformation’ but has gotten away with it because they hold the power. They have lied about COVID being isolated, the effectiveness of masks, testing, actual case counts of COVID, that there are cheap, effective treatments, the true cause of death, and on the effectiveness and safety of the COVID injection, which they own half the patent on. They also have owned SarsCov spike protein injection patents since the early 2000’s, created computer-generated genome sequences claimed to be coronaviruses, patented those man-made sequences, patented the so called “vaccines,” comprised of synthetic lab-made proteins to “treat” the contrived, patented coronavirus, detected by the patented test, to detect the make-believe virus.

While the U.S. General states that, “health misinformation is an urgent threat to public health. It can cause confusion, sow mistrust, and undermine public health efforts, including our ongoing work to end the COVID-19 pandemic,” they are the ones repeatedly sowing misinformation and by keeping life-saving treatment from sick people so they can push their own lucrative treatments and injections.

INTERESTINGLY, THEY CALL THOSE SOWING ‘MISINFORMATION’ ‘SUPER-SPREADERS.”  THIS IS NOT BY ACCIDENT.  BULLIES HAVE ALWAYS USED NAME-CALLING IN THEIR ARSENAL OF TOOLS.

POWER CORRUPTS; ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY.

There is a information war going on.  Make sure you are equipping yourself with facts that haven’t been twisted by those with vested interests.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

More Young Canadians Died From ‘Unintentional Side Effects’ Of Pandemic, Not COVID

https://torontosun.com/news/more-young-canadians-died-from-unintentional-side-effects-of-the-pandemic-not-covid/

More young Canadians died from ‘unintentional side effects’ of the pandemic, not COVID

Between April 23-27,  Toronto Police responded to a number of reports of overdoses from people taking an unknown narcotic in the downtown area.
(Getty Images) GETTY IMAGES

A new report shows that during the pandemic, there were more deaths from “unintentional side effects” than COVID-19, particularly among younger Canadians.

The latest data from Statistics Canada, released Monday, is titled “Provisional death counts and excess mortality, January 2020 to April 2021,” and found there were 5,535 deaths in those younger than 65 years of age.

There were 1,380 COVID-related deaths for that same age group, according to StatCan.

That’s more than four times the amount of deaths.

The report from the Canadian Vital Statistics Death Database suggests that “the excess mortality is, in large part, related to other factors such as increases in the number deaths attributed to causes associated with substance use and misuse, including unintentional (accidental) poisonings and diseases and conditions related to alcohol consumption.”

Aside from in-person support being cut or reduced to social-distancing measures, StatCan also suggests the “economic, social, and psychological impacts of the pandemic as well as the public health measures in place may have played a role in increasing alcohol use among some individuals.”

__________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Viruses

mRNA “Vaccines” Causing Microscopic Blood Clots – Why Lyme/MSIDS Patients Should Be Concerned

ALERT: Doctor says mRNA vaccines “will kill most people” through heart failure, 62% of vaccinated people already show microscopic blood clots

07/13/2021 / By Ethan Huff
ALERT: Doctor says mRNA vaccines “will kill most people” through heart failure, 62% of vaccinated people already show microscopic blood clots

The vast majority of people who are getting injected for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) will die within a few short years from heart failure, warns Dr. Charles Hoffe, M.D., a medical practitioner in British Columbia, Canada.

In one of his latest updates, Dr. Hoffe explains that he is observing in his patients who took an mRNA (messenger RNA) “vaccine” from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna that their capillaries are now plugging up, which he says will eventually lead to a serious cardiovascular event.

Chinese Virus mRNA shots are programmed to turn a person’s body into a spike protein “factory,” and Dr. Hoffe says that over time these mass-produced spike proteins cause progressive blood clotting.

No fewer than 60 percent of people who take an mRNA injection will suffer from these blood clots – and in the end, an overwhelming majority will end up six feet under due to the damage caused.

“We now know that only 25 percent of the ‘vaccine’ injected into a person’s arm actually stays in your arm,” Dr. Hoffe explains one his blog.

“The other 75 percent is collected by your lymphatic system and literally fed into your circulation so these little packages of messenger RNA, and by the way in a single dose of Moderna ‘vaccine’ there are literally 40 trillion mRNA molecules.”

(See link for article & video of Dr. Hoffe)
________________________
**UPDATE**
For a very educational video on what the mRNA injections do inside the body:  https://www.brighteon.com/b246c5de-7b94-469d-b1ce-8f4acecd2152  Dr. Hoffe explains how the blood clots form after the shots.
This panel of doctors also explain the mechanism of COVID injection injury.  The spike protein circulates throughout the entire body.

**Comment**

After having patients complain of breathlessness and other concerning symptoms, Dr. Hoffe has been performing D-dimer tests on these “vaccinated” patients, which led him to discover that at least 62 percent of them have microscopic blood clots.

The idea of altered blood cells due to COVID isn’t new, a fact this website posted on back in May 2020 due to the seminal work of Italian pathologists utilizing 50 autopsies showing micro throbs, in the heart, brain, and kidneys, meaning the patients did not die of interstitial pneumonia as told initially, they died from a blood condition called disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) also found in the x-rays of the lungs.

It is only logical that the injections used for COVID would also alter blood vessels, and this is being seen on a daily basis.

In June, a study came out showing hyperinflammatory responses and coagulation disorders leading to congestions of microvessels to be key drivers. The authors found significant changes in lymphocyte stiffness, monocyte size, neutrophil size and deformability, and heterogeneity of erythrocyte deformation and size. Although some of these changes recovered to normal values after hospitalization, others persisted for months after hospital discharge, evidencing the long-term imprint of COVID-19 on the body.

The good news of course is there are cheap, effective treatments for COVID.  Unfortunately, these treatments are being highly censored.

Please notice the word microscopic blood clots. This means it will not be picked up unless looked for specifically utilizing specific tools. This is also where you should question to word rare, in that ‘authorities’ are stating it’s a rare occurrence.  There are numerous reasons for an effect to go unnoticed.  One reason would be they are utilizing the wrong tools when looking for it, and the other is doctors, let alone patients, don’t even know about the VAERS reporting system (click on link to see the plethora of blood clotting cases)  – as only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported.

The reason this should be especially concerning to Lyme/MSIDS patients is because a Russian study shows Lyme can also cause blood clots. Coinfections can as well, as risk factors for splanchnic vein thrombosis include infections.

Interestingly, heparin, a blood thinner, helps many MSIDS patients:  http://aac.asm.org/content/48/1/236.full.pdf Similarly with Bartonella, some respond miraculously to Heparin, which is a blood thinner. In the above link, heparin was found to inhibit Babesia growth. Horowitz also found it helps clear the parasites from the body.

Heparin helped my husband immensely.  His blood looked like snot and continually clotted in catheters.  He immediately felt improvement (energy, clearer mind) when heparin was added to his treatment protocol.

Hopefully it’s clear that infected Lyme/MSIDS patients are already in a high risk category due to infections.  Getting an experimental, fast-tracked injection known to cause blood clots on top of this risk is dangerous.

Important quote: 

“The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot [regenerate],” he says. “When those tissues are damaged by blood clots, they are permanently damaged.”  Dr. Hoffe

I just posted a perfect example of that here.  A man went into the ER with a severe headache after the COVID shot.  While there, he was diagnosed with Lyme Disease.

DOCTORS BELIEVE SPAULDING’S IMMUNE SYSTEM, WHICH WAS FIGHTING LYME DISEASE, WAS OVERSTIMULATED BY THE COVID VACCINE CAUSING IT TO ATTACK THE MYELIN — THE PROTECTIVE INSULATION THAT SURROUNDS NERVES, INCLUDING THOSE IN THE BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD.

Treatment was immediate and successful in arresting the progression of the disease, but not before Spaulding was almost completely paralyzed.

Almost completely paralyzed.

The insanity of what’s occurring in the world can not be overstated.  Workers are now going door to door trying to get people to receive these injections. Further, our current regime is planning to work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages. In other words, censor your private communications.

This should trouble you.

These door to door workers have no medical training, do not know your medical history, but are trying to force you to make a major medical decision on the spot.  Don’t fall for it.  Don’t give them information, just ask them to leave. Do not allow bullies to affect your personal medical decision.

Your decision to receive medical treatment, including injections, is between you and your health care professional.  Shame on our government.  They are an embarrassment.

Go here for a great read written by a Constitutional attorney on the topic of door to door COVID strike-force teams.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, vaccines, Viruses

More Good News On Ivermectin

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/05/21/ivermectin-for-covid-19.aspx?

More Good News on Ivermectin

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
May 21, 2021
http://

Ivermectin discussion with Dr Tess Lawrie

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that may be even more useful against COVID-19 than hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). However, like HCQ, use of ivermectin has been globally suppressed, discouraged and even warned against, despite decades of safe use for other ailments
  • In the U.S., the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has been calling for widespread adoption of Ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19
  • What makes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-19 is the fact that it works both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals are required, as well as in the inflammatory stage, when the viral load drops off and anti-inflammatories become necessary
  • A scientific review funded by the WHO found ivermectin reduced COVID-19 deaths by 75%. It also increased viral clearance. A meta-analysis of a greater number of studies found a 68% reduction in deaths
  • Despite robust scientific support for ivermectin, the WHO, the U.S. FDA and NIH all refuse to recommend the drug on grounds of insufficient evidence

When it comes to the treatment of COVID-19, many Western nations have been hobbled by the politicization of medicine. Throughout 2020, media and many public health experts warned against the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), despite the fact that many practicing doctors were praising its ability to save patients. Most have been silenced through online censorship. Some even lost their jobs for the “sin” of publicly sharing their successes with the drug.

Another decades-old antiparasitic drug that may be even more useful than HCQ is ivermectin. Like HCQ, ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s list of essential drugs, but its benefits are also being ignored by public health officials and buried by mainstream media.

Ivermectin is a heartworm medication that has been shown to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro.1 In the U.S., the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has been calling for widespread adoption of Ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19.2,3

In the video above, Dr. John Campbell interviews Dr. Tess Lawrie about the drug and its use against COVID-19. Lawrie is a medical doctor and Ph.D. researcher who has done a lot of work in South Africa.

She’s also the director of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd.,4 which is based in the U.K., and she helped organize the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel5 and the International Ivermectin for COVID Conference, held April 24, 2021.

Ironically, as a consultant to the World Health Organization and many other public health organizations, her largest clients are the very ones who are now actively suppressing the use of this drug.

Ivermectin Useful in All Stages of COVID

What makes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-19 is the fact that it works both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals are required, as well as the inflammatory stage, when the viral load drops off and anti-inflammatories become necessary.

According to Dr. Surya Kant, a medical doctor in India who has written a white paper6 on ivermectin, the drug reduces replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus by several thousand times.7 Kant’s paper led several Indian provinces to start using ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and as treatment for COVID-19 in the summer of 2020.8

In the video, Lawrie reviews the science behind her recommendation to use ivermectin. In summary:

•A scientific review by Dr. Andrew Hill at Liverpool University, funded by the WHO and UNITAID and published January 18, 2021, found ivermectin reduced COVID-19 deaths by 75%. It also increased viral clearance. This finding was based on a review of six randomized, controlled trials involving a total of 1,255 patients.

•Lawrie’s meta-analysis, published February 8, 2021, found a 68% reduction in deaths. Here, 13 studies were included in the analysis. This, she explains, is an underestimation of the beneficial effect, because they included a study in which the control arm was given HCQ.

Since HCQ is an active treatment that has also been shown to have a positive impact on outcomes, it’s not surprising that this particular study did not rate ivermectin as better than the control treatment (which was HCQ).

•Adding two new randomized controlled trials to her February analysis that included data on mortality, Lawrie published an updated analysis March 31, 2021, showing a 62% reduction in deaths.

When four studies with high risk of bias were removed during a subsequent sensitivity analysis, they ended up with a 72% reduction in deaths. Sensitivity analyses are done to double-check and verify results.

WHO Still Refuses to Recommend Ivermectin

Curiously, when the WHO finally updated its guidance on ivermectin at the end of March 2021,9,10 they gave it a thumbs-down, saying more data are needed. They only recommend it for patients who are enrolled in a clinical trial. Yet they based their negative recommendation on a review that included just five studies, which ended up showing a 72% reduction in deaths.

Lawrie points out discrepancies in this WHO analysis, such as two studies deemed by Lawrie to have a high risk of bias being listed by the WHO team to have a low risk of bias. (In the interview, she explains why she considers them to have a high risk of bias.)

What’s more, in the WHO’s summary of findings, they suddenly include data from seven studies, which combined show an 81% reduction in deaths. The confidence interval is also surprisingly high, with a 64% reduction in deaths on the low end, and 91% on the high end.

What’s more, their absolute effect estimate for standard of care is 70 deaths per 1,000, compared to just 14 deaths per 1,000 when treating with ivermectin. That’s a reduction in deaths of 56 per 1,000 when using ivermectin. The confidence interval is between 44 and 63 fewer deaths per 1,000.

Despite that, the WHO refuses to recommend this drug for COVID-19. Rabindra Abeyasinghe, a WHO representative to the Philippines, commented that using ivermectin without “strong” evidence is “harmful” because it can give “false confidence” to the public.11

As noted by Daniel Horowitz in an April 1, 2021, article in The Blaze,12 “That sure sounds a lot like telling people if they wear a mask indoors, they won’t get COVID. Tragically, when they invariably do get the virus, the global health elites have nothing to treat them with.”

Doctors Urge Acceptance of Ivermectin to Save Lives

As mentioned earlier, in the U.S., the FLCCC has also been calling for widespread adoption of ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19.13,14

FLCCC president Dr. Pierre Kory, former professor of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has testified to the benefits of ivermectin before a number of COVID-19 panels, including the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in December 2020,15 and the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel January 6, 2021.16 As noted by the FLCCC:17

“The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.

Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a ‘miracle drug’ against COVID-19 and called upon the government’s medical authorities … to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-1918 …

… numerous clinical studies — including peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials — showed large magnitude benefits of Ivermectin in prophylaxis, early treatment and also in late-stage disease. Taken together … dozens of clinical trials that have now emerged from around the world are substantial enough to reliably assess clinical efficacy.

… data from 18 randomized controlled trials that included over 2,100 patients … demonstrated that Ivermectin produces faster viral clearance, faster time to hospital discharge, faster time to clinical recovery, and a 75% reduction in mortality rates.”19

A one-page summary20 of the clinical trial evidence for Ivermectin can be downloaded from the FLCCC website. A more comprehensive, 31-page review21 of trials data has been published in the journal Frontiers of Pharmacology.

At the time of this writing, the number of trials involving ivermectin has risen to 55, including 28 randomized controlled trials. A listing of all the Ivermectin trials done to date, with links to the published studies, can be found on c19Ivermectin.com.22

The FLCCC’s COVID-19 protocol was initially dubbed MATH+ (an acronym based on the key components of the treatment), but after several tweaks and updates, the prophylaxis and early outpatient treatment protocol is now known as I-MASK+23 while the hospital treatment has been renamed I-MATH+,24 due to the addition of ivermectin.

The two protocols25,26 are available for download on the FLCCC Alliance website in multiple languages. The clinical and scientific rationale for the I-MATH+ hospital protocol has also been peer-reviewed and was published in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine27 in mid-December 2020.

NIH Loosens Restrictions, FDA Warns Against Prophylactic Use

In mid-January 2021, the NIH did revise its guidelines on ivermectin, in large part thanks to the data presented by Kory and others. However, while the NIH no longer warns against its use, they also do not outright recommend it, and they did not grant ivermectin emergency use authorization.

As a result, many patients in the U.S. still struggle to access the drug, as many doctors are unwilling to prescribe it off-label against health officials’ recommendations.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has adopted an even less favorable stance, March 9, 2021 actually issuing a consumer warning March 5, 2021, to not use ivermectin as a prophylactic.28 The FDA also has not approved ivermectin for prevention of or treatment for SARS-CoV-2.29

The International Ivermectin for COVID Conference

April 24 through 25, 2021, Lawrie hosted the first International Ivermectin for COVID Conference online.30 Twelve medical experts31 from around the world shared their knowledge during this conference, reviewing mechanism of action, protocols for prevention and treatment, including so-called long-hauler syndrome, research findings and real world data.

All of the lectures, which were recorded via Zoom, can be viewed on Bird-Group.org.32 In her closing address, Lawrie stated:33

“The story of Ivermectin has highlighted that we are at a remarkable juncture in medical history. The tools that we use to heal and our connection with our patients are being systematically undermined by relentless disinformation stemming from corporate greed.

The story of Ivermectin shows that we as a public have misplaced our trust in the authorities and have underestimated the extent to which money and power corrupts.

Had Ivermectin being employed in 2020 when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end.

Since then, hundreds of millions of people have been involved in the largest medical experiment in human history. Mass vaccination was an unproven novel therapy. Hundreds of billions will be made by Big Pharma and paid for by the public.

With politicians and other non-medical individuals dictating to us what we are allowed to prescribe to the ill, we as doctors, have been put in a position such that our ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath is under attack.

At this fateful juncture, we must therefore choose, will we continue to be held ransom by corrupt organizations, health authorities, Big Pharma, and billionaire sociopaths, or will we do our moral and professional duty to do no harm and always do the best for those in our care?

The latter includes urgently reaching out to colleagues around the world to discuss which of our tried and tested safe older medicines can be used against COVID.”

During the conference, Lawrie proposed that doctors around the world join together to form a new people-centered World Health Organization. “Never before has our role as doctors been so important because never before have we become complicit in causing so much harm,” she said.

– Sources and References

“We now have four large randomized control trials totaling over 1,500 patients each trial showing that as a prophylaxis agent [against COVID-19] it is immensely effective,” Kory said. “You will not get sick. You will be protected from getting ill if you take it in early outpatient treatment.”

Category:

Activism, Treatment, Viruses

Sharyl Attkisson: Big Tech Is Censoring Key Facts About COVID Vaccine Safety

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/sharyl-attkisson-big-tech-censoring-facts-covid-vaccine-safety/

Sharyl Attkisson: Big Tech Is Censoring Key Facts About COVID Vaccine Safety

Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson said on “The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast” that Big Tech “is censoring factual and truthful information while propagating false information” about the safety of COVID vaccines.
No matter how diligent your research, finding truthful information about the risks of COVID vaccines can be tricky.

No matter how diligent your research, finding truthful information about the risks of COVID vaccines can be tricky, according to investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson.

During a recent segment of “The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast,” Attkisson said information about the safety of COVID vaccines and other medicines is often “falsely portrayed by propagandists and pharmaceutical interests.”

COVID vaccines are being used on an “emergency basis,” said Attkisson, meaning they weren’t subjected to the same safety trials vaccines normally go through before hitting the market. “That’s why we’re learning things in real time as we go,” she said.

Attkisson said the fact that some scientists are calling for an immediate halt to the use of COVID vaccines, at least until new safety measures are put in place, is evidence of mounting concerns about the safety of the vaccines.

Attkisson cited a paper by 57 scientists from 17 countries warning of the potential risks of vaccinating the world with shots that lack adequate safety testing. The authors of the paper, published in Authorea, demanded answers from international health agencies, regulatory authorities, governments and vaccine developers.

The authors wrote:

“Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, the race for testing new platforms designed to confer immunity against SARS-CoV-2, has been rampant and unprecedented, leading to conditional emergency authorization of various vaccines. Despite progress on early multidrug therapy for COVID-19 patients, the current mandate is to immunize the world population as quickly as possible. The lack of thorough testing in animals prior to clinical trials, and authorization based on safety data generated during trials that lasted less than 3.5 months, raise questions regarding vaccine safety.

“Given the high rate of occurrence of adverse effects that have been reported to date, as well as the potential for vaccine-driven disease enhancement, Th2-immunopathology, autoimmunity and immune evasion, there is a need for a better understanding of the benefits and risks of mass vaccination, particularly in groups excluded from clinical trials.”

Listen here:  https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/07/hard-facts-on-covid-19-vaccine-safety-and-conflicting-advice-podcast/

© [7/12/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

_____________________

**UPDATE July 15, 2021**

In an unprecedented totalitarian move, an advisory put out by the U.S. Surgeon General is recommending that Big Tech companies (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc) impose consequences for accounts that violate the private companies’ own policies.  In other words the government is telling privately owned companies what to do – particularly with regard to what they call ‘misinformation’, defined as ‘information that is false, inaccurate, or misleading according to the best available evidence.’

This article states Facebook now says medical studies published in peer-reviewed journals are FAKE NEWS if they conclude things it disagrees with.  One paper in question was published in JAMA, revealing that masking schoolchildren exposes them to dangerously high intake of carbon dioxide.  This paper was recently retracted, by JAMA but a German study on nearly 26,000 children found the exact same thing, not to mention numerous studies have shown them to be pathogen reservoirs. These are unacceptable findings to Zuckerberg and go against what Fauci said at one point before flip-flopping a few times, therefore must be eliminated from planet earth.  A year ago, I posted a PPE developer’s experience with having trouble breathing using the N95 mask and his subsequent experiment showing the lowered oxygen levels, but experience and expert testimony don’t matter anymore.  He believes lack of oxygen isn’t as noticeable with other masks due to the gaps and holes – but that these very gaps and holes make them ineffective against a virus; however, wearing masks continuously for hours every day has never been done or studied, therefore the long-term impact has been unknown until now.

When users or pages attempt to share either of the two articles, a warning pops up from Facebook’s “fact checkers” explaining that the peer-reviewed science is a “hoax”.  I’m certain FB also would not approve of sharing the fact that graphene oxide has been found in masks.

In case you missed it, Big Tech has already been censoring and shutting down accounts that disagree with what the government is peddling, which includes theirown infective treatments and injections they erroneously call “vaccines.”

Our own government is guilty of ‘misinformation’ but has gotten away with it because they hold the power. They have lied about COVID being isolated, the effectiveness of masks, testing, actual case counts of COVID, that there are cheap, effective treatments, the true cause of death, and on the effectiveness and safety of the COVID injection, which they own half the patent on.

While the U.S. General states that, “health misinformation is an urgent threat to public health. It can cause confusion, sow mistrust, and undermine public health efforts, including our ongoing work to end the COVID-19 pandemic,” they are the ones repeatedly sowing misinformation and by keeping life-saving treatment from sick people so they can push their own lucrative treatments and injections.

Interestingly, they call those sowing ‘misinformation’ ‘super-spreaders.”  This is not by accident.  Bullies have always used name-calling in their arsenal of tools.

Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.

There is a information war going on.  Make sure you are equipping yourself with facts that haven’t been twisted by those with vested interests.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses