Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Unvaccinated Hospital Staff Only Ones Telling the Truth Regarding Vaccine Injuries As They Prepare to Leave the Medical System & Elite Biker Sidelined By Jab – Talks About Recovery & Support Groups

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/unvaccinated-hospital-staff-only-ones-telling-the-truth-regarding-vaccine-injuries-as-they-prepare-to-leave-the-medical-system/

Unvaccinated Hospital Staff Only Ones Telling the Truth Regarding Vaccine Injuries as They Prepare to Leave the Medical System

California Hospital Workers Preparing to Strike. Image source.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

We are looking at a total breakdown and failure of America’s hospital system.

Ethical nurses and doctors are being censored and fired, while those who remain face horrific work conditions due to shortages of staff, and many of them are about to go on strike in California and other places.

The unvaccinated nurses and hospital staff who have not yet left, are coming forward to describe the horror scenes they are witnessing in the hospitals, where the majority of the patients now are fully vaxxed and suffering terrible side effects from the vaccines.

And all of this, other than the coming strikes, is being censored in the pharma-owned corporate media.

The Conejo Guardian, a non-profit independent news publication in Ventura County, California, has just published an article from hospital staff whistleblowers stating that doctors are covering up COVID-19 vaccine injuries, and failing to report them to VAERS.

“They don’t want to report that they’re seeing 80 percent of the people in the ER are vaccinated, but only 40 percent of the county is vaccinated,” says one nurse.

Ventura County Nurses Blow the Whistle on Crisis in Local Health Care

by Joel Kilpatrick
The Conejo Guardian

Excerpts:

Ventura County nurses from differ­ent sectors and specialties are coming forward to blow the whistle on what they deem serious lapses in local health care practices, mostly related to COVID-re­lated protocols, “vaccine” mandates and politically and financially motivated bul­lying of medical staff, which these health care workers say is seriously compromis­ing the general quality of local care.

The Guardian spoke with multiple nurses of various ages and at different stages in their careers, all of whom work in medical care settings or hospitals in Ven­tura County. Each preferred to speak un­der a pseudonym for now. Each described seriously declining standards of care, atmospheres of intimidation and fear in hospitals, and distrust and disillusionment among medical professionals.

“Before COVID, nurses, staff and the community were confident in treatment modalities and in doctors’ competencies,” says one nurse. But now, “People are con­fused.”

“They’re very confused,” agrees a veter­an Ventura County nurse. “I think doctors are confused. … I don’t think the commu­nity’s confident. I’m not. … Because where’s the truth?”

Most shocking, perhaps, is how doctors and administrators refuse to report the rising number of unexplained medical problems in otherwise healthy people as potential adverse reactions to COVID-19 experimental vaccine shots.

To suggest that these shots are the cause of any medical problem — or that they are contributing to the alarming rise in non-COVID-related hospital populations — invites professional ridicule.

“Nobody is considering that [these medical problems] could be vaccine-re­lated,” says an ICU nurse in a county hospital.

“It’s not even in question. You might as well say you want to start treating people with crystals and burning sage. If you say it’s the vaccine, they look at you and say, ‘It’s the safest thing ever produced. Why would you say that?’”

Yet, doctors are at a loss to explain the increase in non-COVID-related ailments, including a reported increase in heart at­tacks in young people, mainly men, who received the COVID-19 vaccines.

Doctors “just chalk it up to genes,” one nurse says.

‘Bury the Bodies in the Parking Lot’

When nurse Daniel first heard of the novel coronavirus spreading in China in December 2019, he immediately bought N95 masks for his family. His superiors told him to prepare for a “worst-case sce­nario.”

“I made a video to each of my kids and my wife, just in case,” he says.

“[Our hospital was] saying, ‘Every floor will have ventilators. There’s not enough PPE. Nurses and doctors are dying in Italy. Somebody’s go­ing to have to bury the bodies in the parking lot because that’s how many people are going to die.’

That’s the picture they painted, all these people you respect and have gone to school a lot longer than I have and have accolades by their names.”

Daniel sent his wife and kids to live elsewhere for a month and a half while he prepared to handle the rush of dead and dying. What happened next, he says, was that “nobody came.”

“I was getting called off a shift almost every other week because there was such a low patient population in the hospital,” he says.

“Not only did ventilators not happen, but we had only six COVID patients in our ICU. The hospital had canceled all these elective surgeries, and we were not getting even a tenth of the ventilated patients they said it would be. Not even close.”

Initial predictions were so off that “it was like they carried the zero several times. That’s the magnitude.”

But by spring 2021, “an interesting thing” happened, he says. In the wake of widespread vaccinations, the number of non-COVID patients “really started pick­ing up.”

“Pneumonia cases, stroke cases,” he says. “We’ve had more strokes than normal. Women in particular with venous sinus embolisms.

We’re seeing a lot of autoimmune issues: rashes on the body, the body attacking the nervous system, producing symptoms like a weakening of the muscles.”

One patient came in with severe respi­ratory distress and went into respiratory failure, with symptoms first showing three weeks after he took the Pfizer shot.

“His lungs were completely destroyed, totally wrecked,” says Daniel. “He had ground-glass opacity on the CAT scan, which is a hallmark of COVID.”

The patient’s doctors insisted it was an exceedingly rare condition, though the man had never suffered respiratory distress before. When the man’s wife brought up the possibility of vaccine-related damage, the doctor simply said, “No.”

“It was a non-starter to the discussion,” Daniel says. “He did not want to talk to her about it. It was just crazy talk [to him].”

One fit, healthy nurse in her twenties whom Daniel knows went into cardiac arrest three weeks after she received the Pfizer shot. An aortic dissection ruptured a portion of her aorta like a balloon.

She was resuscitated, underwent open-heart surgery and made a full recovery. But she could not abide the suggestion that the COVID vaccine shots had caused it.

“She said, ‘It’s not possible. It’s not the vaccine,’” Daniel says of the woman.

“She’s petite and doesn’t have any condition that would lead to this. … Sometimes you can’t accept information because it’s affecting you on a deeply emotional level. People don’t want to admit they were wrong — they were fooled. Some have staked their lives on this decision, and nothing’s going to change that.”

Adverse reactions among those who took one of the vaccines continue, he says, but go virtually unreported.

“If you look at our hospital’s reporting on adverse reactions, this vaccine would have no adverse reactions,” he says.

No VAERS Reporting

Angela, a nurse for more than 25 years, confirms that in her hospital’s emergency room, they say they are seeing more heart problems in young adults, which are never reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Re­porting System (VAERS) as potential ad­verse reactions to COVID “vaccinations.”

Another nurse, Jennifer, says ER nurs­es privately say they are seeing:

“all the clot­ting, bleeding and things you would expect from the vaccine six months later — brain bleeds, heart attacks in younger 50-year-olds. No doctor will admit this is from the vaccine. They won’t make the VAERS re­port.”

When Daniel asked fellow nurses and practitioners if they report to VAERS, they looked at him like, “What’s that?”

“I’ve seen people in their thirties [with these problems], and the doctor’s just like, ‘Oh, you have s—y genes,’” he says. “I’m like, are you kidding me?”

All nurses interviewed say they are seeing “ground-glass opacity” results in the CT scans of people’s lungs who recently took the experimental vaccines — and that this is never reported to VAERS.

“Doctors and intensivists [treat it like] a ludicrous thought,” says one ICU nurse. “Nobody is putting it on their differential diagnosis.”

‘Voodoo Statistics’

For that and other reasons, COVID-re­lated data amounts to what one nurse calls “voodoo statistics.” In her particular unit and others, they are no longer testing ev­erybody for COVID. Rather, they began testing only those who are symptomatic — with shortness of breath, for example — and those who say they are unvaccinated.

Why?

“They don’t want their numbers to skyrocket when all the vaccinated people come in,” says Jennifer.

“Or they don’t want to report that they’re seeing 80 percent of the people in the ER are vaccinated, but only 40 percent of the county is vaccinated,” adds another nurse.

“That’s an odd statistic. … Is there an adverse effect occurring from these shots that’s not being reported? If they’re not screening people ubiquitously, there’s a slant to whatever numbers are coming in. That stuff is not going to be elucidated in the data.”

But with “vaccinated” people increasingly hospitalized with actual COVID or adverse reactions, the way forward becomes murkier.

“These vaccines are non-sterilizing. They allow you to carry and transmit the virus,” points out one nurse. “It does not solve the contagion issue. The virus is still spreading among the vaccinated.”

For example, in a recent group of COVID patients at one hospital, the sickest ones were double-vaccinated.

“The first to die had both Pfizer shots,” says Daniel, who took care of the patient. “Another guy who had both shots died as well. His lungs were destroyed.”

“But they’re not talking about that,” confirms another nurse.

______________

Recently, I posted that the “vaccine” walkouts have begun.  I’ve since updated this article with more information.  In short:

  • Mayo Clinic in Minnesota is losing 8,000 employees who are refusing the COVID jab. Hundreds of protesters marched downtown in protest for more than 4 hours calling for an end to “medical tyranny,” and chanting “shame on Mayo.”  Video of protest within link.
  • UCLA Medical Hospital, not content with simply firing their employees privately who refuse the jab, wait until these practitioners are busy with patients to barge into the room and publicly shame them in front of patients by escorting them out of the building.  Is this still the U.S.A.?

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/champion-professional-mountain-bike-racer-sidelined-by-covid-19-shot-talks-about-recovery-and-support-groups/

Champion Professional Mountain Bike Racer Sidelined by COVID-19 Shot – Talks About Recovery and Support Groups

Dr. John Campbell interviews Mountain Bike racer Kyle Warner who is suffering from Pericarditis after a COVID-19 Shot.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

One of our readers sent me this video, and while I seldom have enough time to watch a 40-minute video, I was quickly draw in by the incredible interviewing skills of Dr. Campbell, and the openness and frankness with which Kyle talked about his debilitating COVID-19 vaccine injury.

Kyle Warner is 29-years-old and is a former champion mountain bike racer who also has a very large online audience.

He recently went public with his COVID-19 vaccine injury, and Dr. Campbell does an incredible job of discussing just what he has had to go through to receive help from skeptical doctors who do not want to admit COVID-19 vaccine injuries exist.

Kyle also shares what has helped him and what has not, in his effort to overcome his COVID-19 vaccine injury which has resulted in diagnoses of Pericarditis and Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

Kyle talks about his support group, and how some of them have already committed suicide, highlighting the overwhelming need right now to provide help and support to these COVID-19 vaccine damaged people.

This is on Dr. Campbell’s YouTube channel for now, but we have also uploaded a copy to our Bitchute channel as well.

Links that Kyle shared in the video:

https://www.react19.org/

https://www.realnotrare.com/

https://www.youtube.com/c/KyleAprilRideMtb/featured

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

“Must See” Video – Australia to Proudly Flood the Country With Virus-Transmitting “Vaccinated” People

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-10-25-australia-tyrants-promise-to-flood-the-country-with-virus-carrying-vaccinated-people.html

Australian tyrants promise to FLOOD the country with virus-transmitting “vaccinated” people… global biowar aims to REMOVE humanity before the coming “big event”

Monday, October 25, 2021 by:

(Natural News) AUSTRALIA: Queensland health official Jeannette Young is now promising to flood the country with vaccinated super spreaders who carry covid, claiming on video, “Every single queenslander is going to get exposed to the covid-19 virus and will get infected.”

She adds, “We will be bringing in virus in vaccinated people…” and then specifically explains she is targeting unvaccinated people with this biowarfare attack by explaining, “But if you’re vaccinated, that’s not a problem.”

This unthinkable admission of coordinated criminal activity by the government of Queensland is just the latest assault on humanity being waged by Australian officials who are so corrupt and evil, it’s almost like they’re competing for an award from Satan himself.

Watch this stunning comment in the following video. The text callout was added to the video by someone else and was not in the original broadcast video:

Brighteon.com/8d554303-cd88-45d7-b6ad-2020c26075c9

(See link for article and video)

______________

**Comment**

Young previously warned that COVID injections should not be given to people under age 50 due to adverse events and deaths; however, she has now fallen in line and is actually perpetrating biowarefare against those who have chosen not to get the clot shot.

Natural immunity isn’t mentioned once, nor the need to protect the frail and those with compromised immune systems.  None of that matters to these people.  They frankly just don’t care, and expect you to mindlessly throw your medical freedom away and toe the line. 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Pfizer the Bully is at it Again & The “Vaccine” Walkouts Have Begun

**UPDATE Nov. 4, 2021**

Pfizer just put out this creepy ad targeting children to take their dangerous, lucrative jab:

http://

Nov. 1, 2021

The company referred to children who got the vaccine as part of the experiment as “superheroes” with “superpowers.”

This push to vaccinate children is in spite of the fact that children face a near-zero threat from the virus. What’s more, as Americans are quickly learning, the “vaccine” loses efficacy over time, doesn’t stop transmission or infection, and leads to a large number of “breakthrough” cases, which the Centers for Disease Control can no longer sweep under the rug.

http://

WION: The World is One News

Oct. 20, 2021

Public Citizen, a non-profit organization says that Pfizer can stop countries from speaking about contracts, block vaccine donations, unilaterally change delivery schedules & demand public assets as collateral.

Palki Sharma tells you more. #Pfizer #CovidVaccine #Gravitas

About Channel: WION -The World is One News, examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to the politics of the world. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalised united world. So for us the World is truly One.

One must ask, why is a “vaccine” manufacturing company requiring sovereign assets, bank reserves, and military bases? 

Also important to note is governments are required to protect Pfizer against intellectual property theft, while they are free to use anyone else’s intellectual property.  Anyone else out there sense that Pfizer expects to be sued?

Pfizer has all the cards and anyone stupid enough to sign this contract loses, every single time.

“This is vaccine terrorism.” Palki Sharma

_______________

Pfizer pays mainstream media.  This explains the severe conflicts of interest and lack of real news.

Public Citizen has identified several unredacted Pfizer contracts that describe the outcome of these negotiations. The contracts offer a rare glimpse into the power one pharmaceutical corporation has gained to silence governments, throttle supply, shift risk and maximize profits in the worst public health crisis in a century. Important to note: 

  • private arbitrators, not public courts, decide disputes in secret
  • Pfizer can go after state assets
  • Pfizer can prevent the use of other remedies.  Countries are forced to go through on their “vaccine” orders even if other drugs or treatments emerge.  Is it any wonder governments have suppressed drugs like HCQ & Ivermectin?  If these drugs were allowed, the clot shots would be completely unnecessary.  The shots cost $19.50 per dose in the U.S., paid for by taxpayer dollars.

(Scroll to Oct. 24, 2021 tweet)

**UPDATE, Oct. 28, 2021**

  • Gov. Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma has replaced Army Maj. Gen. Michael Thompson with Army Brig. Gen. Thomas Mancino, and now the state’s National Guard no longer has to get “vaccinated.” A memo explained that the Oklahoma National Guard responds to Gov. Stitt, not to Biden or any other usurper in Washington, D.C., who is demanding that free Americans damage their DNA and immune systems with Big Pharma drugs.
  • 12,000 members of the Air Force refuse orders to get COVID shots.
  • Mayo Clinic in Minnesota is losing 8,000 employees who are refusing the COVID jab. Hundreds of protesters marched downtown in protest for more than 4 hours calling for an end to “medical tyranny,” and chanting “shame on Mayo.” Video of protest within link.
  • UCLA Medical Hospital, not content with simply firing their employees in private who refuse the jab, wait until these practitioners are busy with patients to barge into the room and publicly shame them in front of patients by escorting them out of the building.  Is this still the U.S.A.?
  • Southwest Airlines employees are pushing back. Hear what a Southwest Pilot Captain and many employees have to say about medical freedom.  After only the first week of protest, three major U.S. airlines have already softened their language.  Is this an early checkmate to Biden’s federal “vaccine” mandate?
  • New York City sanitation workers, firefighters, police officers, EMS personnel and correctional officers gather in protest.
  • A family is suing the school after their child was “vaccinated” with the COVID jab without their consent.
Meanwhile, CDC director, Walensky states these “vaccine” hesitant workers will be sent for “education and counseling.”

And if you are wondering why people are flooding U.S. borders, the Biden Administration has instructed the Secretary of Homeland Security to make sure illegal aliens get jobs over American workers.

http://

Public Figures Walking Away From Millions of Dollars Resisting “Vaccine” Mandates

Oct. 20, 2021

The Hill

A few points from the news report to consider:

  • natural immunity isn’t mentioned once and it, hands down, is the best form of protection
  • nobody wants to discuss the fact some people never should get “vaccinated” due to preexisting health conditions and beliefs
  • safety studies were done by the “vaccine” manufacturers and they simply proclaimed them to be safe and effective, when many experts challenge this tenant
  • statistics,  study end-points, study designs, definitions, etc. have all been manipulated skewing all results for a predetermined outcome in favor of Big Pharma and the government, not public health
  • how can you have an accurate “vaccine” when the test is a complete scam?
  • how can you continue to support anything that has caused the highest amount of adverse reactions and deaths than any other vaccine in history?  Keep in mind, all numbers are woefully low due to the fact only 1% of events get reported to VAERS, as well as the fact doctors refuse to connect adverse events and deaths to the injections, and the corrupt CDC only counts someone as “vaccinated” 14 days AFTER the final injection.  Anyone dying prior to that is counted as unvaccinated
  • how can you support an injection that destroys the very parts of a person’s DNA (C8) that makes them healthy and free from cancer and neurological diseases?
  • how can you continue to support an injection that drives viral immune escape and propagates disease?

Frankly, I’m sick and tired of people bragging they are “pro-vaccine,” and “pro-science” as if those are badges of honor. First, this is NOT a vaccine.  It doesn’t stop transmission or infection. Second, this injection has been linked to more death than any vaccine in history and the severe reactions and deaths continue.  Third, we no longer have science or public health we can trust.

Question everything. What vaccine, what science, and by whom?

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

COVID Surge in Waterford, Ireland Where 99.7% of Adults are Fully “Vaccinated.” Taiwan Death From COVID “Vaccination” Exceeds Death From COVID. Heart Attacks up 25% in Scotland Since COVID Jabs Introduced. Why is Nobody Listening?

https://citizenfreepress.com/column-3/covid-is-surging-in-waterford-ireland-where-99-7-percent-are-double-vaccinated/

Posted by Kane on October 17, 2021

(See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

Hopefully by now it’s abundantly clear that these dangerous, experimental, fast-tracked injections do not stop transmission or infections and those exposed to the wild virus are more likely to get severe cases which can result in hospitalizations or deaths.  None of this is new and we are warned about it ages ago, but few heeded the warning.

Waterford, where almost every single adult has been double jabbed now has one of the highest infection rates in the country.  Further, the number of “vaccinated” in the ICU is almost as high as the entire number of Covid patients in ICU a year ago.

Refusing to see or admit the truth, the chief clinical officer states it would be worse if it weren’t for the “vaccine.”

________________

https://medicaltrend.org/2021/10/10/taiwan-death-from-covid-19-vaccination-exceeds-death-from-covid-19/

Taiwan death from COVID-19 vaccination exceeds death from COVID-19

Important excerpts:

(Observer Network News) On October 7th, the death toll after vaccination in Taiwan reached 852, while the death toll after the COVID-19 was diagnosed was 844. The number of deaths after vaccination exceeded the number of confirmed deaths for the first time.

On October 6, the Kuomintang “legislator” Yeh,Yu-Lan bluntly stated in a Facebook post that the vaccine given to save lives has also nearly doubled the number of deaths due to the COVID-19, which is indeed very ironic and confusing.  (See link for article)

________________

https://vaccinedamage.news/2021-10-05-heart-attacks-up-25percent-scotland-covid-jabs.html

Heart attacks up 25% in Scotland since covid jabs were introduced, media plays dumb as to why

10/05/2021 / By

The so-called “experts” claim they are baffled by a sudden spike in heart attack cases in Scotland ever since Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” were released to the general public.

During the summer, Scotland saw a 25 percent rise in the number of “fully vaccinated” people who had to be rushed to Golden Jubilee National Hospital in Clydebank with partially blocked arteries, a common occurrence among those who get injected.

“Typically the centre, which is the largest of its kind in the UK and treats people from five health board areas, receives 240 patients a month suffering with this form of heart attack, but this rose to more than 300 over May, June and July of this year,” reported The Times of London.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Scotland is seeing a surge in seriously ill patients requiring a hospital bed.  The article states most are fully “vaccinated.”

Mainstream media never mentions the jabs as a possible trigger or cause of all the cardiovascular events despite the fact they are causing verifiable blood clots and imposing inflammatory conditions on the cardiovascular system. The spike protein disrupts human cardiac pericytes function and contributes to micro-vascular disease through CD147-receptor-mediated signaling. A cardiologist warns about covid “vaccine” fraud and hyper-inflammatory immune responses caused by the shots. A pathologist warns spike proteins cause damage in multiple organs, including the heart, which is what we are now seeing in those injured by the shots.

Once you have heart damage the heart does not heal itself. The heart is damaged forever.

We’re ruining kids’ hearts for life with these shots. Dr. Cole

The latest news about the injuries and deaths being caused by Chinese Virus injections can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

_______________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/safety-signals-covid-vaccines-full-transparency-cdc-fda

Safety Signals for COVID Vaccines Are Loud and Clear. Why Is Nobody Listening?

The public deserves a complete and transparent accounting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s safety monitoring, including the results of all interim reports and analyses, whether through a Freedom of Information Act request, Congressional order or some other means.
© [9/29/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
Number of Deaths Since 1990.

Summary:

  • There is a disproportionately large number of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from COVID-19 vaccines compared with other vaccines.
  • There are 91x the number of deaths and 276x the number of coagulopathy events reported after COVID-19 vaccination than after flu vaccination.
  • Safety signals were found for 242 adverse events using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) methodology.
  • Full transparency of CDC and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety monitoring is urgently needed.

(See link for full article)

Important excerpt:

What this means in practice, however, is that if the CDC investigators do not understand how these novel vaccines — which use gene therapy technology and have had only limited use in humans — might cause a particular type of adverse event, the presumption is that there is no plausible connection.

For example, the CDC has declared after reviewing over 7,000 reports of deaths reported in the U.S. as of Sept. 7, they were not able to determine a plausible causal relationship for any of them, except for three due to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) from the Janssen vaccine.

But the methods and criteria they use to make these determinations aren’t published anywhere, assuming they even exist. It would be easier to take their word for it if their decision-making process wasn’t hidden behind a veil of secrecy.

 

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

How the Definition of ‘Fully Vaccinated’ Misleads People on COVID-19 ‘Vaccine’ Safety & Efficacy & New Study Proves the ‘Vaccinated’ Are Dragging Out the Pandemic

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/how-the-definition-of-fully-vaccinated

How The Definition of “Fully Vaccinated” Misleads People on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety & Efficacy: An Explanation For CNN’s Drew Griffin

Received one dose only? You’re Unvaccinated. Two doses? Wait another 14 days. If you survive, congratulations. You’re fully vaccinated.
Everywhere I turn I see claims of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety from studies in the US that defy all logic and reason. The results are the opposite of those seen in the UK and Israel. Here, I go through claims made that have led to the belief that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe, and effective, and explore factors that have been carefully manipulated to produce that misperception.
  1. Moderna Vaccine’s 95% Efficacy
  2. “An Epidemic of the Unvaccinated”
  3. “Boosters are Effective”
  4. “Pfizer’s Vaccine >90% Effective (ahem, “Useful”) in Children Aged 5-12”
  5. “Zero deaths and serious adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines”

I recently watched a CNN segment in which Drew Griffin’s beliefs are absolutely contradicted by the facts that CDC defines “Fully Vaccinated” as people who have made it to the second week (14 days) after their second dose. The fact that anyone who experiences adverse events or dies, and anyone who is diagnosed with COVID-19 before 2 weeks have passed after their second dose are not counted as deaths in the “fully vaccinated”. That means that a person who is vaccinating might not be considered “Fully Vaccinated” until five weeks after their first dose.

It is shameful for Griffin to not know this fact, and the impact of this fact on calculations of breakthrough infections vs. re-infections vs. infections in the “unvaccinated”. Therefore, I outline in detail for Dr. Griffin the key information he needs to know.

  1. Moderna Vaccine’s 95% Efficacy. In January 2021, I published an article in Robert F. Kennedy’s online magazine, The Defender. The article, entitled “Discrepancies in Moderna’s FDA Report Demand Answers”, I offered the following analysis:

“In contrast to what Moderna reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the early months of COVID-19, its mRNA vaccine is not an established technology. It is new. As a new, experimental vaccine, it deserves close and objective scrutiny.

Moderna reports 94.5% efficacy. The “efficacy” of vaccines is understood to be a measure of the effectiveness of the vaccine on an ideal population, and differs from “effectiveness,” which is how well a vaccine manages to induce evidence of immunity in the real population upon which it is being used.

Moderna reported to the FDA (Zhang, 2020) efficacy as the ratio of the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated (16 infected out of 28,068 vaccinated) to the rate of infection in the placebo group (275 infected out of 27,956 given placebo).

Close inspection of Moderna’s data made public ahead of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBAC) meeting that was scheduled for Dec. 17, 2020, however, reveals that among the vaccinated, an additional 81 participants and 118 among the placebo participants developed a COVID-19 diagnosis between the first and second shots. These participants were determined to be ineligible for the second dose and removed from the study.

By my calculations, these additional cases shift the vaccine efficacy from 94.5% to 75.4%.

If a chemotherapy agent is being tested against another cancer treatment, the deaths that occur between scheduled treatment rounds must be counted. It is misleading not to count these additional cases of COVID-19 in the Moderna vaccine trial — the 94.5% efficacy is not based in clinical reality even for an ideal population.”

“Efficacy” here, and in Moderna’s use, means the ability of the vaccine to prevent a certain condition in an ideal population. They excluded people with health conditions – for example, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, autoimmune disorders.

What does this mean for the rest of us? Well, given that they reported 95% efficacy, when it should have been 74.4%, means that the vaccine coverage needed for herd immunity was going to be way low.

Fauci’s initial 66-67% coverage needed for herd immunity was tied to Moderna’s 95% efficacy. Fauci never should have come in that low, for two reasons. First, Moderna’s 95% efficacy – the performance of the vaccine in an ideal population – was not, as I showed, 95%. Second, that efficacy could not have been expected to translate into effectiveness – the performance of the vaccine in a non-ideal population, the one with people with metabolic disorder, diabetes, and autoimmune conditions.

Even though later trials used the same tactic of excluding people who got COVID-19 before the second dose, the official estimate of vaccine effectiveness in fact took a nose-dive in the 60-70% range in studies on sample groups representative of the full adult population, and yet to this day public health servants still cite the vaccine as “effective as 95% as in the Moderna trial”.

The data from Barnstable, Massachusetts tell a different story. This was an MMWR report that showed that 74% of new cases in Barnstable County were in those who had been exposed to COVID-19 vaccines. The report actually used the term “exposed”, and they also showed that the RT-PCR cycle threshold distribution of the two groups, “exposed” and “unexposed” were not different. This was the report that led CDC Director Rochelle Walensky to warn that people who were vaccinated still needed to wear a mask and to socially distance.

Almost all of the new cases were Delta variants. Using the 74% of cases in the vaccinated number, it is possible to estimate vaccine efficacy against the Delta variant. Assuming an R0 of 2.6, the VE of all vaccines combined in use in Barnstable County for single-dose exposed persons was almost precisely zero. When estimated for persons exposed to two doses, the VE falls to -0.26, or =26%. People in Barnstable County who are “fully vaccinated” have a 26% increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis.

See: Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021 Weekly / August 6, 2021 / 70(31);1059-1062

It is worth pointing out that because the clinical trials used PCR to determine the case status in the patients considered “vaccinated” and those considered “unvaccinated”, the actual efficacy estimates were likely invalid given they should have been calculated after a certain number of COVID-19 cases had occurred. With false positive rates of PCR ranging from 11% to over 90%, the actual disposition of patients in the vaccinated and unvaccinated arms of the trial is anyone’s guess.

  1. “An Epidemic of the Unvaccinated”

CDC’s Director, Rochelle Walensky, said yesterday that CDC’s definition of “fully vaccinated” might need to be updated due to boosters. This semantic gameplay would back the population into mandated boosters if the OSHA rule comes through. Remember that it was Walensky who overruled the FDA’s decision to not recommend boosters for all. So now, we are facing the confusing situation in which people w/vaccine cards are no longer “fully vaccinated”. As we have seen, the efficacy of the current vaccines against extinct variants might be reasonably high (whatever it is), but the efficacy against extant variants seems to be in question. So, with eternal boosters, perhaps no one will ever be considered “Fully Vaccinated” in the US under CDC’s ever-changing definition.

CDC: When You’ve Been Fully Vaccinated https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html

The accuracy of the claim that the new cases in the US are occurring primarily in the unvaccinated hinges entirely on the CDC’s definition of “Fully Vaccinated”. We know that people who have had two doses are not considered “Fully Vaccinated” until day 14 after their second dose. So, when new cases occur in the partially vaccinated, they do not count toward cases in the vaccinated. There is significant evidence that COVID-19 vaccination may impair the immune system for a short period of time following administration; in particular, the likelihood of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, or an infection by any other respiratory virus or bacterium may be more likely following vaccination. In animal trials on SARS and MERS viruses, close relatives of SARS-CoV-2, and in studies in humans of the RSV virus, this phenomenon was called “disease enhancement”. If disease enhancement is occurring after the first dose, or within two weeks following receipt of the second dose, the CDC’s semantics will bias the case count data and make it appear as if those exposed to vaccines have a lower risk of COVID-19 infection than those who are unvaccinated.

Proof of this type of statistical manipulation in action can be found in a report from the OKLAHOMA COVID-19 WEEKLY REPORT Weekly Epidemiology and Surveillance Report September 19-25, 2021, which, after reporting more new cases in the unvaccinated than in the vaccinated, dropped this fact into a footnote of at table:

“**Vaccine breakthrough cases is (sic) defined as an individual with a COVID-19 positive laboratory results (PCR/Antigen) and documentation of COVID-19 vaccination that meets the definition of fully vaccinated. (Individuals are considered fully vaccinated ≥2 weeks after receiving the last dose in the COVID-19 vaccine series.)”

Due to this sleight-of-statistical-hand, we will need to revisit all of the clinical studies and non-peer reviewed press releases on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines as well as the CDC’s non-peer-reviewed MMWR reports and re-estimate vaccine efficacy, breakthrough cases, and vaccine safety.

“Boosters are Effective”

The claims that boosters are effective begs the question: effective at what?

  • Preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2? No.
  • Reducing deaths due to COVID-19? No.
  • Reducing hospitalization of patients with positive PCR results (true positives + false positives combined)? Yes. However, remember that people are not considered “boosted” until fourteen days after the second dose. Unless COVID-19 cases in those waiting for fourteen days to be counted are included in the calculation of breakthrough cases, we cannot know the true efficacy of boosters.

Pfizer’s Vaccine >90% Effective (ahem, “Useful”) in Children Aged 5-12

News reports tell us that “kid-size doses of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine appear safe and nearly 91% effective at preventing symptomatic infections in 5- to 11-year-olds”.

The Phase 2/3 trial had one=month safety follow-up, and yet the same new source touts “The shots could begin early next month — with the first children in line fully protected by Christmas — if regulators give the go-ahead.”

The Pfizer website describes the trial as “the first of a pivotal trial”. The doses were spaced 21 days apart – meaning that children were not considered “vaccinated” until five weeks after their initial exposure.

It is noteworthy that the incidence of COVID-19 in children is so low that the trial had to accrue patients from four countries. It is also noteworthy that the trial did not undergo peer review; in fact, the company published the results in a press release, which included caveats that the release includes “forward-looking statements”, meaning they put a positive spin on the contents of the press release to encourage investors.

Among those forward-looking statements?

“In participants 5 to 11 years of age, the vaccine was safe, well tolerated and showed robust neutralizing antibody responses.”

The press release does not specify if the vaccination produced neutralizing antibodies against the initial Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is extinct, or the more recent variants, such as the Delta variant.

Their less-than forward-looking statements included:

  1. “There is a remote chance that the vaccine could cause a severe allergic reaction
    • A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to one hour after getting a dose of the vaccine. For this reason, vaccination providers may ask individuals to stay at the place where they received the vaccine for monitoring after vaccination
    • Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include difficulty breathing, swelling of the face and throat, a fast heartbeat, a bad rash all over the body, dizziness, and weakness
    • If an individual experiences a severe allergic reaction, they should call 9-1-1 or go to the nearest hospital
  2. Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) have occurred in some people who have received the vaccine. In most of these people, symptoms began within a few days following receipt of the second dose of the vaccine. The chance of having this occur is very low. Individuals should seek medical attention right away if they have any of the following symptoms after receiving the vaccine:
    • chest pain
    • shortness of breath
    • feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart
  3. Side effects that have been reported with the vaccine include:
    • severe allergic reactions; non-severe allergic reactions such as rash, itching, hives, or swelling of the face; myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle); pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart); injection site pain; tiredness; headache; muscle pain; chills; joint pain; fever; injection site swelling; injection site redness; nausea; feeling unwell; swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy); diarrhea; vomiting; arm pain
  4. These may not be all the possible side effects of the vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. The vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials. Call the vaccination provider or healthcare provider about bothersome side effects or side effects that do not go away.”
    The FDA has determined that the “study” was not large enough to have detected myocarditis – and yet Pfizer has not updated their report to their investors on this fact.

    Pfizer would have use vaccinate 28 million children on one months’ safety data and a study that was not large enough to detect even a well-recognized serious adverse event.

  1. “Zero deaths and serious adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines.

The world knows about myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, and we have known about it for some time. In June 2021, Tom Shimabukuro gave a presentation to ACIP, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This was a key meeting at which ACIP would vote to recommend or not recommend that COVID-19 vaccine for teens.

Shimabukuro reviewed data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink – the VSD – a taxpayer-subsidized resource to which only a handful of people are allowed to have unrestricted access. In those data, he reported zero (0) serious adverse events and zero (0) deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines in the United States.

See: Shimabukuro, T. 2021. COVID-19 Vaccine safety updates Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) June 23, 2021

Shimabukuro’s presentation followed a review of myocarditis and pericarditis by a CDC employee, who, in the Q&A, reported that the signal of increased risk of myocarditis in males relative to females in older children (teens) and also in younger children.

In his presentation, Shimabukuro made a point on one slide to highlight myocarditis:

It will be important to know whether Shimabukuro used the CDC’s twisted definition of “Fully Vaccinated”. If he did, then all of the events following the receipt of the first dose and those following the second dose on days 0-13 did not count as occurring in the vaccinated, which would be absolutely misleading.

Two days later, FDA issued a warning on myocarditis and pericarditis risk in male teens following COVID-19 vaccination in spite of Shimabukuro’s presentation. The signal for myocarditis has been established reproducibly by independent analysts. This demonstrates at the very least that VSD – and Dr. Shimabukuro – do not provide “Pharmacovigilance”.

Throughout his presentation, Shimabukuro uses the euphemism “immunization”, showing a lack of knowledge on the fact that “exposure to vaccine” does not equal “immune”, especially in this setting with a rapidly evolving mRNA virus.

In his discussion of VAERS data, Shimabukuro reminds the attendees that “a report to VAERS does not necessarily mean that the vaccine has caused a health problem”, but he failed to also report that “This caveat does not mean that the vaccine has not caused a health problem”.

Data from Ontario, Canada show an increase in myocarditis over time – increases from baseline – as vaccination increased over time – a population-level dose-dependent response not expected unless causality was in play.

These data show a range of rates of myocarditis trending toward 20 per hundred thousand. Shimabukuro’s reported his rate estimates at 7 per million. I stand by my conclusion that we do not have anything close to vaccine safety monitoring in the United States.

See: mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination and Development of CMR-confirmed Myopericarditis, https://archive.md/pvggn

Shimabukuro’s analysis of myocarditis using VAERS used data up to June 11, 2021. The VAERS analysis separated results following dose 1 and dose 2; the results consistently showed increased risk with the second dose, again, indicative of causality and perhaps pathogenic priming.

Evidently, those reporting to VAERS did not get the memo that those suffering myocarditis following exposure to vaccination should not be considered vaccinated until five weeks after their initial dose.

Conclusions

In the NVICP, causality determination often requires adverse events or deaths following a vaccine to be observed within 8 weeks of the receipt of the vaccine (often using rates beyond 8 weeks as a baseline, which can be higher than the national baseline rates, making that practice also bogus). To delay designation of a vaccinated person as “vaccinated” until up to five weeks after the initial dose is a brazen statistical manipulation to bury perception of adverse events and deaths from COVID-19 vaccination. It is a shameful practice and must not only be stopped: its effects must be reversed.

The public deserves to see efficacy re-calculated, as well as all rates of break-through cases, rates of reinfection cases, and new case rates all reported assuming that the individuals who have been exposed to COVID-19 vaccines, even a single dose, are “vaccinated”. Otherwise, the effect of the vaccine itself is never actually studied, and the relative risk of COVID-19 diagnosis in the vaccine-exposed and the vaccine-unexposed will never be known.

Now that boosters are here, no one may ever be counted as “fully vaccinated”. This sick, twisted perversion of logic and reason does not jive with reality, and people are going to get hurt needlessly. With draconian policies putting people’s jobs on the line, their very livelihood, this is far, far more than risk of vaccine injury or death. The definition of groups being studied must be changed to “vaccine exposed” and “vaccine naive”.

If the negative efficacy estimate from the data from the Barnstable report holds, then new breakthrough cases combined with the expected surge in “cases” due to false positives in the millions who may opt to be tested instead of vaccinating will lead to a fifth surge in COVID-19 that dwarfs the peak of the pandemic. The US will have more new “cases” of COVID-19 than the rest of the world combined… that will be a sure sign that something is truly rotten in the United States of America.

_________________

https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/23/new-study-proves-the-vaccinated-are-dragging-out-the-pandemic.aspx

New Study Proves the Vaccinated Are Dragging Out the Pandemic

October 23, 2021

A leaked Department of Defense slide show presentation that was quickly removed from the internet, but has been preserved in archives and on private websites shows that the shots are not meeting experts’ expectations.

Using hospitalization records from 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries who were fully “vaccinated”, the researchers found that 148,000 fully “vaccinated” individuals age 65 and older came down with COVID anyway; 30,000 were hospitalized in an intensive care unit and 9,400 were admitted to an intensive care unit. The death rate was 2.2%.

In the slide show, authors point out that the vaccine effectiveness against infection and hospitalization “is lower than reported in smaller studies.” Specifically, using metrics showing that 80% of persons over age 65 as “vaccinated”, “73% of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals.”

Not only that, according to Slide 8:

“Breakthrough infection rates five to six months post vaccination are twice as high as three to four months post vaccination.” The waning immunity was observed in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna shots.

And — contrary to “official” reports in the media — Slide 12 says it was the “VACCINATED” driving the high infection numbers during the summer of 2021, as “61% of COVID-19 of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully ‘vaccinated’ individuals in the week of July 24 alone.

The study concluded that the jabs are more effective at preventing hospitalization than infection, and that  “prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect against breakthrough hospitalization.” The study was done by the Defense Department’s Project Salus.

SOURCES:

Wayback Archives September 21, 2021

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses