Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

58% of Infant Deaths Reported to VAERS Occurred Within 3 Days of Vaccination, Research Shows & ‘This is Really a Giant Experiment’

58% of Infant Deaths Reported to VAERS Occurred Within 3 Days of Vaccination, Research Shows

By  Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E.

© [8/3/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

In a new research paper published in the journal Toxicology Reports, author Neil Z. Miller found that out of a total of 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS between 1990 and 2019, 58% occurred within three days of vaccination, and 78% occurred within seven days of vaccination.

In a new research paper published in the journal Toxicology Reports, author Neil Z. Miller reports on the relationship between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) death and the timing of vaccination, based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database.

SIDS is defined as the sudden and unexpected death of an infant that remains unexplained after a thorough investigation. Although there are no specific symptoms associated with SIDS, an autopsy often reveals congestion and edema of the lungs and inflammatory changes in the respiratory system, according to the National Center for Health Statistics Vital Statistics of the United States 1988, Volume II, Mortality, Part A, Public Health Service, 1991.

Prior to contemporary vaccination programs, SIDS — sometimes referred to as “crib death” — was so infrequent it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics.

After the national immunization campaigns were initiated in the U.S. in the 1960s, for the first time in history, most U.S. infants were required to receive several doses of DPT, polio, measles, mumps and rubella vaccines.

Shortly after, in 1969, medical certifiers presented a new medical term — sudden infant death syndrome.

In 1973, the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics added a new cause-of-death category — SIDS — to the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD).

By 1980, SIDS had become the leading cause of postneonatal mortality (deaths of infants from 28 days to one year old) in the U.S.

As Miller points out in his article, the ICD category for vaccine-related death, or cause of death as “prophylactic inoculation and vaccination,” was eliminated when the ICD was revised in 1979 — despite the fact that this information would be useful in trying to understand the relationship between vaccination and death.

But Miller, a medical research journalist and the director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute, provides an alternative route for establishing such a correlation — by observing the temporal relationship between vaccines and reported infant deaths, including SIDS deaths, in the CDC’s VAERS database.

Miller found that out of a total of 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1990 through 2019, the majority “clustered” in close temporal proximity to vaccination — 58% occurred within three days of vaccination, and 78% occurred within seven days of vaccination.

Miller found the excess deaths within these ranges were statistically significant (p<0.00001), meaning the chance that this result is random is less than 0.001%.

The same type of clustering was present in the 1,048 reports of infant deaths (out of the total 2,605) reported to VAERS specifically as SIDS.

According to Miller, if there were no correlation between vaccination and infant deaths, one would expect to see an even spacing of deaths within the time range reported prior to vaccination —- not a clustering of deaths as Miller found.

Miller included a comprehensive literature review in his paper refuting the “official” claim that the SIDS epidemic was curtailed by having infants sleep on their backs — as recommended by the “Back to Sleep” campaign, initiated in 1992 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

The subsequent rate of SIDS dropped by an annual average of 8.6% between 1992 and 2001. However, the neonatal mortality rate due to “suffocation in bed” increased during that same time at an average annual rate of 11.2%.

Other similar causes of infant death also increased significantly during this period, as reported by Miller. Further, from 1999 through 2015, the U.S. SIDS rate declined 35.8%. while infant deaths due to accidental suffocation increased 183.8 %.

Miller also affirms his main results from the paper (i.e., the temporal clustering of SIDS deaths with vaccination) through the discussion of seven additional peer-reviewed studies and two confidential reports.

On average, these authors found that substantial proportions of infant deaths occurred within one day (mean = 25%), three days (mean = 49%) and seven days (mean = 71%) post-vaccination, matching the results of the present study.

Mechanistically, vaccine injury has been tied to SIDS multiple times. Matturri et al. (2014) examined 13 SIDS deaths occurring within seven days of a hexavalent vaccine.  Analysis of the brainstem and cerebellum of the deceased infants showed brain edema and congestion in all victims.

The authors hypothesized that “several compounds and immuno-potentiation adjuvants of the hexavalent vaccine might easily go beyond the blood-brain barrier, which in the first year of life is still immature and quite permeable, inducing neuronal molecular alterations in DNA, RNA and proteins of brainstem neurons regulating vital functions, with consequent fatal disorganization of respiratory control in particularly predisposed infants.”

Specifically, these authors implicated aluminum-based adjuvants in the dysregulation of respiratory control.

Scheibner and Karlsson (1991) monitored infant breathing during sleep before and after the DPT vaccination, revealing an increase in episodes where breathing nearly ceased or stopped completely. These episodes, which continued for several weeks post-vaccination, were not seen prior to vaccination.

Despite the official insistence that SIDS deaths are not caused by vaccination, as Miller points out, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation (NVICP) is set up to compensate families of individuals who are injured and/or die from vaccine administration.

Death from vaccination is compensated with $250,000 for “pain and suffering” to family members of the deceased victim. Conditions typically leading to death that are considered “table injuries” to be compensated under the NVICP include anaphylaxis and encephalopathy or encephalitis.

‘Healthy babies just don’t die for no apparent reason’

Kari Bundy, who lost her son after his four-month vaccinations, said she’s always been “flabbergasted” at the denial of the medical community of the link between SIDS and vaccines. “For me, it was too obvious to even attempt to ignore,” Bundy said.

Bundy lost her third-born child, Mason, in 2011.

“A few days after his routine four-month vaccinations, my husband and I discovered his dead body in the middle of the night, laying on his side, his body still warm,” Bundy said

Mason’s autopsy came back “unremarkable,” aside from some thymic petechiae, which is the most common gross finding in SIDS cases at autopsy.

“I was assured time and time again that he had not suffocated,” Bundy said.

When Mason died, Bundy learned if you can’t pay for a funeral, you can’t have one. So a few months after Mason’s death, she founded a nonprofit called Mason’s Cause, to provide grants to cover funeral costs for families who had experienced the loss of a child under the age of 1.

“I never wanted any parent to experience this devastating loss and not be able to bury their child,” Bundy said. She continued running the charity for just under 2 years, during which time she worked with 94 different families who experienced the death of a child under age 1.

Of those 94 infant deaths, 87 died from SIDS, or from causes “unknown.” Of the SIDS cases, 81 — or 93% — died within seven days of routine vaccinations.

“When I realized SIDS seemed to be undeniably related to vaccines, I realized I could no longer dedicate my life to running a charity that would help bury babies,” Bundy said. “That’s when I realized I wanted to save babies by speaking out about the real risks of vaccination.”

Bundy, who works for Children’s Health Defense as translations coordinator, said she’s grateful for research like Miller’s because it shows what she and all SIDS parents already knew — healthy babies don’t just die for no apparent reason.

Listen to the interview with Neil Miller, author of the study of SIDS and vaccines, on the “Right on Point” Podcast by clicking on top link.

________________

https://www.theblaze.com/news/ben-carson-covid-vaccinations-children-giant-experiment

Dr. Ben Carson blasts COVID vaccinations for children: ‘This is really a giant experiment’

Sarah Taylor, November 01, 2021
Excerpt from article:
“Plus, we don’t know what the long-term impact of these vaccines is, so this is really sort of a giant experiment,” Carson explained. “Do we want to put our children at risk, when we know that the risk of the disease to them is relatively small, but we don’t know what the future risks are? Why would we do a thing like that? It makes no sense whatsoever.” Dr. Ben Carson

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines

Pfizer Scientist: COVID Antibodies Pass “Through the Umbilical Cord” to Child During Pregnancy & Pfizer’s Jab “Just Doesn’t Work” in Some People

http://

COVID Antibodies Pass Through Umbilical Cord to Fetus

Oct 15, 2021

SHOCK VIDEO: Pfizer Scientist admits Pfizer Covid vaccine “just doesn’t work” in some people

Oct 15, 2021
Project Veritas
If Youtube scrubs these videos, go to:  https://www.projectveritas.com/
______________
**Comment**
  •  whistleblowers: COVID jab kills more than it saves
  • Pfizer scientist: antibodies are probably better than the jab
  • internal emails tell Pfizer employees to avoid discussing fetal cells are used in the injections
  • J&J officials: children shouldn’t get shots but adults who don’t comply with mandates should be ‘inconvenienced’
  • FDA economist states “vaccine hesitant” African Americans should be given the injections through a blow-dart
  • Pfizer can stop countries from speaking about contracts, block vaccine donations, unilaterally change delivery schedules & demand public assets as collateral
For more:

In a July 1, 2021, commentary in The Lancet Microbe,3 Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele and Michel Vaillant also argue for the use of absolute risk reduction when discussing vaccine efficacy with the public. They too went through the calculations, coming up with the following:

Pfizer/BioNTech — Relative risk reduction: 95%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.84%
Moderna — Relative risk reduction: 94%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
Gamaleya (Sputnic V) — Relative risk reduction: 91%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.93%
Johnson & Johnson — Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
AstraZeneca/Oxford — Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.3%

Category:

Activism, Pregnancy, vaccines, Viruses

MIT Scientist on COVID “Vaccine”: ‘Don’t Go Near It’ & Warnings for Pregnant Women

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-tv-against-wind-paul-thomas-stephanie-seneff-neil-z-miller-covid-vaccines  Video Here

MIT Scientist on COVID Vaccine: ‘Don’t Go Near It’ + Warnings for Pregnant Women

10/21/21

The latest episode of CHD.TV’s “Against the Wind” with host Dr. Paul Thomas featured an interview with Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., senior research scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who discussed the “stealth design” of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines.

Thomas also interviewed Neil Z. Miller, medical research journalist, director of Think Twice Global Vaccine Institute and author of “Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies,” on his extensive research on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and COVID vaccines.

Thomas began the show with a big announcement: He is taking care of pediatric patients again. His medical license, suspended by the Oregon Medical Board days prior to publishing a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study, was reinstated in June.

Next, Thomas asked Seneff why doctors like Peter McCullough and scientists like herself believe mRNA vaccines pose more risks than benefits to everyone who receives them, including the elderly and children.

Seneff said:

“I believe that they are extremely toxic and a lot of it has to do with all the manipulations that they made on the product. It’s a completely not-natural system. They’ve created this monster messenger RNA molecule that pretends to be human, but the changes that they made in the messenger RNA that would normally be a virus — they turned it into a human messenger RNA. That’s very important.”

Seneff and Thomas discussed how this molecular change makes cells miss signals and act inappropriately, which causes severe adverse effects, including reproductive harm.

Seneff offered parting words to anyone taking the COVID vaccine, “Don’t go near it,” she said.

Thomas shifted the conversation to Miller, who reported three discoveries based on his analysis of VAERS and COVID vaccines:

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) analysis on the safety of COVID vaccination during pregnancy, published in the The New England Journal of Medicine, was conducted on 827 pregnant women. The analysis concluded no “obvious safety signals,” yet Miller’s review of the tables found 104 spontaneous abortions, which is 12.6% of the participants. Of the participants, 700 were not vaccinated until the third trimester.
  • Older age groups are most likely to have serious adverse events after COVID vaccination.
  • Based on his 2021 study on vaccines and sudden infant deaths, of the 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1990-2019, 58% clustered within three days of post-vaccination and 78% of infant deaths reported to VAERS clustered within seven days post-vaccination.

Miller also presented an analysis of four peer-reviewed studies on the vaccinated versus unvaccinated, including a 2021 study co-authored by CHD.TV’s Brian Hooker, Ph.D., which found vaccinated children were significantly more likely than unvaccinated children to develop adverse health conditions.

Regular contributor Bernadette Pajer, public policy director of Informed Choice Washington, finished the third part of the show with news and information on journalist  Jeremy Hammond’s article on natural immunity, and what the CDC is hiding about COVID vaccines and myocarditis, according to tech entrepreneur Steve Kirsch.

Tune in every Wednesday at 10:30 a.m. PT / 1:30 p.m. ET for a new episode of “Against the Wind” on CHD.TV.

“Against the Wind” is hosted by Dr. Paul Thomas, a Portland, Oregon pediatrician and author of “The Vaccine-Friendly Plan.” Each show features interviews with doctors and scientists who are bringing light to vital studies not covered by the media, and the persecution they face for standing up for medical freedom.

________________

For more:

Category:

Pregnancy, vaccines, Viruses

FDA Rubber Stamps Pfizer’s Plan to Inject 28 Million Kids With COVID Jab: Committee Member States the Only Way to Know it’s Safe is After They Just ‘Start Giving it’

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/fda-committee-rubber-stamps-pfizers-plan-to-inject-28-million-children-5-to-11-years-old/

FDA Committee Rubber Stamps Pfizer’s Plan to Inject 28 Million Children 5 to 11-Years-Old

Oct. 26, 2021

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

I was going to have the headline to this article state that the FDA rubber stamped the Biden Administration’s plans to vaccinate 28 million children with the Pfizer COVID shot, but let’s stop pretending and state what is obvious to everyone: Pfizer is calling the shots in the White House regarding COVID-19 vaccine policy.

Unsurprisingly, the FDA Advisory Committee today voted 17-0 to approve the experimental Pfizer COVID-19 injection for children ages 5 to 11.

The panel was made up of industry insiders, including the infamous pediatrician, Paul Offit, who has stated that he believes an infant can easily be injected with 10,000 vaccines at one time.

He is the pharma-controlled corporate media’s go-to “doctor” spokesperson when it comes to childhood vaccines.

In a time when the corporate media still covered both sides of the vaccine debate, CBS actually allowed a report by then reporter Sharyl Attkisson expose the massive conflicts of interest that Offit has with childhood vaccines.

We have used this video many times over the years, and I think you might still be able to find it on YouTube, but we have uploaded a copy to our Bitchute and Rumble channels. This is at least 15 years old, maybe even older.

Another doctor on the committee that was considering whether these shots were safe enough to give to young children stated:

“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes.”

The FDA collected comments from the public regarding whether or not the Pfizer shots should be recommended to be given to children age 5 through 11, and according to Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the Covid-19 Early Treatment Fund, they counted over 139,470 comments posted AGAINST giving authorization to the shots, and could only find ONE comment in favor of the shots.

The link where the comments were collected is now offline. https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2021-N-1088-0001 (Update: we did find a link where you can view the comments submitted here.)

Steve Kirsch was also present at the meeting as a non-voting member of the public, and shared 30 slides with the FDA Advisory Committee asking 30 questions that needed to be answered prior to giving approval. Here are the first 10 slides he shared which are now a matter of public record, and he also has over 100 more slides in a .pdf found here

(See top link for full article and many informative graphics)

_______________

For more:

REGARDING CHILDREN

Injecting children with this experimental gene therapy, who rarely get COVID or transmit it, and have more than a 99.9% chance of surviving is the height of insanity. A team of Johns Hopkins researchers recently reported that when studying a group of about 48,000 children, they found zero COVID deaths among healthy kids, but the Centers for Disease Control just doesn’t care.  

A recent report by Public Health Ontario showed heart inflammation following these shots is significantly more prevalent in young people, with over 100 needing hospitalization for “vaccine”-related heart problems.  And a preprint study, showed healthy boys between ages 12-15 were 4-6 times more likely to be diagnosed with myocarditis from the COVID injections than they were to be hospitalized with COVID.

  A respected geneticist has issued a warning for young people stating,
“THE RISK IS HIGHER TO BE VACCINATED BY ASTRA-ZENECA THAN NOT TO BE VACCINATED. THAT’S IT. IT’S AS CLEAR AS THAT.”

Large U.K. study, the most comprehensive on the topic to date, backs up clinical reports that show children and teens are less likely to be hospitalized or face severe effects from the virus.

Finally, the WHO has seen the light and now states, “Children should not be vaccinated for the moment.” The WHO truly meant “for the moment” because 48 hours later it did an about face.  Seems our public health authorities flip flop more than a waffle maker.

COVID SHOTS ARE BIOWEAPONS

Numerous experts including Dr. Fleming, a  Cardiologist, Nuclear Cardiologist Certified in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with a Juris Prudence Doctor of Law, who is a Researcher, Inventor, and Author states in his book, Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and and Forensic Investigation states that these injections are nothing more than the genetic code of the COVID-19 bioweapon. This book traces the publication and money trail of COVID-19; showing who is ultimately criminally responsible for the design and development of this weapon, which violates the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) Treaty, exposing those who have committed crimes against humanity. He also states that a “good” bioweapon doesn’t kill people but slowly demoralizes and harms them by causing “slow malicious diseases.”

Fleming isn’t alone.

  • Nobel Prize Winner Dr Luc Montagnier with numerous other scientists, states COVID has been manipulated and that components of HIV have been inserted into the viral sequence, perhaps in pursuit of an AIDS vaccine.
  • Dr. Lee Merrit, past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and member of America’s Frontline Doctors, states that COVID is the perfect binary weapon.
  • Dr. Mikovitz and Dr. Martin both discuss COVID as a bioweapon. The COVID-19 “vaccine” does not meet the legal definition of a “vaccine,” but it meets the legal definition of a “bioweapon.”  Further, Dr. Mikovitz states at least 50 million Americans over the next few years will die due to COVID injections.  That’s 15% of the population.
  • Karen Kingston (Pfizer whistleblower) confirms the COVID injections ARE BIOWEAPONS.
  • 5 doctors state the injections are bioweapons. The injections cause YOU to manufacture spike proteins – perhaps indefinitely – the very thing causing illness. Those getting the shots are now transmitting this spike protein to the unvaccinated.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

NIH Director Shredded Over Risky Research in Wuhan (Finally) & NIH Scrubs “Gain-of Function” From Website

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nih-director-shredded-over-risky-research-wuhan-after-cnn-interview-goes-sideways

NIH Director Shredded Over Risky Research In Wuhan After CNN Interview Goes Sideways

by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Oct 27, 2021

While most corporate media outlets are throwing softballs at Dr. Anthony Fauci over revelations that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded risky gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China, Fauci’s ‘boss’ – NIH Director Francis Collins – wasn’t so lucky.

In a blistering Sunday night interview, CNN’s Pamela Brown (credit where it’s due) absolutely grilled Collins over the NIH’s funding of New York-based nonprofit, EcoHealth alliance, which performed textbook Gain of Function research – genetically engineering bat coronaviruses so they can infect humans. Last week the NIH admitted that EcoHealth violated the terms of a grant by failing to report their achievement (which EcoHealth denies), sending both Fauci and Collins into full damage control over the weekend.

Now, the official story is that while EcoHealth violated their contract, and are allegedly ‘in trouble’ for failing to report their achievement, the NIH and NIAID (Collins and Fauci) maintain that the research still wasn’t risky enough to qualify for enhanced oversight.  (See link for article and video interview)

_____________

**Comment**

Collins and Fauci are experts at word-craft.  They redirect, distract, filibuster, and deceive with semantics. 

Important excerpt:

While Collins admits Ecohealth did some things they should have reported, he believes they didn’t do anything that requires special oversight.  The problem with this argument is if Ecohealth HAD reported their results, it would have triggered the very oversight Collins is so quick to state wasn’t needed. The article points out Collins’ straw man construct that the research in no way is connected with COVID, and then blames Congress. He has to audacity to state that none of this research put human lives at risk, and that we should just believe these criminals are being transparent despite the fact NIH and NIAID, while cutting off funding in Wuhan, have awarded EcoHealth millions in other contracts, and the NIH has ignored several Congressional requests for information and records about its work in China.

Ron Paul warned that the NIH is still funding the research:

Transparent?  Yeah, right.

Best quote:

“This is US taxpayer dollars going to risky research and I believe every American deserves to know about it.” Pamela Brown

Correction: Every person on planet earth deserves to know about it.

_______________

Regarding transparency, if the NIH has nothing to hide, why did it just scrub “Gain-of Function” from its website?

For more:

Important excerpt:

“Dr. Collins’s time as NIH director has been marked by unprecedented levels of taxpayer funding for grotesque and illegal experiments with aborted baby body parts and even live-aborted infants,” Daleiden told the Free Beacon. “Before he leaves the NIH directorship, Dr. Collins should comply with the congressional document requests in full and salvage his legacy by revealing the full truth about government-sponsored trafficking of aborted infants.” – David Daleiden, founder and president of Center for Medical Progress  Source

NIH budget increased 37% under Collins and is now $41 billion per year.

President Biden will nominate a new director, who will be voted on by the Senate.

“Anthony Fauci has spent, listen to this number, 191 BILLION dollars, not 3.7 million, not 30 million, 191 BILLION dollars of audited funds for the bioweaponization of viruses against humanity.

And it is YOUR money that has been spent.”  Dr. David Martin  Source

During a Department of Justice oversight hearing, Representative Andy Biggs questioned Merrick Garland about Fauci’s lies, noting that they constitute perjury, asking whether Garland would be opening an investigation.

Garland responded “Again, I’ll refer to the long standing departmental norm that we don’t comment about investigations pending or unpending, the general point that you’re making normally would come with a referral from the relevant committee.”

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses