Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Vaccine Studies: Flu Vaccine Increases Risk of Pneumonia & Death and There’s no Science Behind School Vaccine Mandates

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-223-million-person-study?

BREAKING: 2.23 Million-Person Study Finds Pneumococcal Vaccines Increase Risk of Pneumonia and Death

The vaccines given to nearly every U.S. child and senior were linked to higher pneumonia and death rates in one of the largest real-world studies ever conducted.

For decades, U.S. and European health authorities have promoted pneumococcal vaccination as an “essential” tool to prevent serious bacterial pneumonia, meningitis, and sepsis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae.

In the United States, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) currently recommends:

  • Infants and children <5 years: a 4-dose series of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine—PCV15 or PCV20—at 2, 4, 6, and 12–15 months.
  • Adults ≥50 years (PCV-naïve or unknown history): one dose of a PCV—PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21. If PCV15 is used, give PPSV23 one year later (minimum 8 weeks for certain high-risk conditions).
These vaccines are given to tens of millions of Americans every year.

Now, a landmark population-based study published in BMC Infectious Diseases has shattered the rationale for current pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) recommendations. Analyzing outcomes among 2,234,003 adults aged 50 and older in Catalonia, Spain, the authors found that recipients of both PCV13 and PPSV23 were significantly more likely to be hospitalized for pneumonia and more likely to die from pneumonia-related causes compared to their unvaccinated counterparts—even after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and influenza vaccination status.  (See link for article)

BTW: This is not new info:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/10/flu-vaccine-education/

_________________

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29061349/

Patterns of childhood immunization and all-cause mortality

Abstract

Background: Evidence supports the safety of the recommended childhood immunization schedule as a whole. However, additional research is warranted as parents’ refusing or delaying vaccinations has increased in recent years. All-cause mortality has been identified as a priority outcome to study in the context of the recommended immunization schedule.

Methods: We included children born January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2009, enrolled in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) from birth through 18 months of age. We examined vaccination patterns during the first 18 months of life among 8 vaccines, and identified deaths occurring between 19 and 48 months of age. We excluded children with complex chronic conditions, contraindications to vaccination, and deaths due to injuries, congenital anomalies, or diseases with onset prior to 19 months of age. We calculated mortality rates among children with different patterns of immunization, and incidence rate ratios (IRR) using the Cox proportional hazards model for children vaccinated according to the schedule versus undervaccinated children, adjusting for outpatient healthcare utilization, influenza vaccination, sex, and VSD site.

Results: Among 312,388 children in the study, 199,661 (64%) were vaccinated according to the schedule, and 112,727 (36%) were delayed or not vaccinated for at least one vaccine dose. Of 18 deaths eligible for analysis, 11 occurred in children following the schedule (2.28 per 100,000 person-years), and seven occurred in undervaccinated children (2.57 per 100,000 person-years). Mortality rates among children following the schedule were not significantly different from those of undervaccinated children when excluding deaths with unknown causes (IRR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.33-4.99), as well as when including deaths with unknown causes (IRR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.32-2.99).

Conclusion: Although there were few deaths, our results do not indicate a difference in risk of all-cause mortality among fully vaccinated versus undervaccinated children. Our findings support the safety of the currently recommended immunization schedule with regard to all-cause mortality.

And I agree entirely with Steve Kirsch’s statement:

“I bet those CDC authors cut the time period short to just before things were starting to get interesting.”

This proves school ‘vaccine’ mandates are unfounded and unscientific.

For more:

Research Catching Up to Post-Acute COVID-19 ‘Vaccination’ Syndrome

**UPDATE**

A new peer-reviewed paper now offers a biological framework for symptoms for PACVS which is often mistaken for long covid or ME/CFS.

Three distinct biological mechanisms underlie the condition:

  • Metabolic dysfunction
  • Autoimmunity
  • Vascular damage

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/from-fringe-to-focus-how-research?

From Fringe to Focus: How Research Is Catching Up to Post-Acute COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS)

PACVS (Post-Acute COVID Vaccine Syndrome) is real, and the science is finally opening up. Months ago, IMA researchers broke ground. Now, another team is validating what patients have known all along.

Research catching up to PACVS

Those suffering from Post-Acute COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS) face not only debilitating symptoms but also institutional resistance to recognition, diagnosis, and care. Despite these barriers, researchers are beginning to shed light on this under-recognized condition. Those who follow IMA know we’ve been working in this space for years—seeing our peers in the research community finally open up is more than encouraging.

A recent publication by Yong et al. in Reviews in Medical Virology offers one of the most comprehensive summaries to date on PACVS (which they refer to as Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome, or PCVS). Their team, spanning 25 institutions, reviewed existing scientific literature and highlighted several important areas of progress:

*See references in https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rmv.70070

Key Takeaways from the Review:

Terminology

The review outlines the evolving language around this condition—from “Long Vax” to “post-vac syndrome.” At the Independent Medical Alliance, we’ve adopted Post-Acute COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS) as our standard terminology to reflect both the temporal and mechanistic distinctions from Long COVID.

Symptom Clusters

The article identifies hallmark symptoms that will be familiar to both clinicians and patients: fatigue, cognitive dysfunction (brain fog), and paresthesia.

*This figure for post-COVID-19 syndrome is reproduced under an Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license

The image above is adapted from an earlier study on “post-COVID-19 syndrome” (long COVID). The more recent article expands on this by introducing additional system categories: autonomic, visual, auditory, gustatory**, and multi-system syndromes that highlight a broader range of physiological effects.

It introduces new symptoms, including

  • paresthesia
  • neuropathy
  • tremors
  • orthostatic hypotension
  • fluctuating blood pressure or heart rate
  • heat or cold intolerance
  • vision problems
  • tinnitus
  • taste dysfunction
  • urticaria
  • exercise intolerance.

It also adds a new section on multi-system and immune-mediated conditions such as POTS, SFN, ME/CFS, myocarditis, VITT, and ITP, framing the syndrome as a more complex, vaccine-specific condition with autonomic and immune involvement beyond the generalized symptoms in the second image.

Proposed Mechanisms

The authors explore two leading hypotheses for PACVS: one centering on spike protein–induced tissue damage and another on dysregulated immune responses. While not mutually exclusive, both warrant deeper investigation.

Treatment Landscape

Though research is still early, the paper compiles a useful snapshot of current treatment strategies—ranging from manual therapies (e.g., compression garments, vestibular rehab) to pharmaceuticals (SNRIs, modafinil) and nutraceuticals (melatonin, NADH, acetyl-l-carnitine).

📣 Call for Papers: PACVS Special Edition

Our team at the Independent Medical Alliance has made PACVS research a central focus. Now, we’re inviting submissions for a special edition of the Journal of Independent Medicine dedicated to this emerging condition. If you’re studying spike injury, vaccine-related syndromes, or chronic post-injection effects, we encourage you to submit your work or learn more here before the submission deadline of December 31, 2025.

The Yong et al. review is a welcome contribution to the growing PACVS landscape, but much more research is urgently needed. Our team recently published a complementary case series on PACVS mechanisms and treatment hypotheses, available here:

👉 Read the study in Heliyon
👉 Read the summary at IMAHealth.org

Together, let’s build the evidence base for the patients still waiting to be heard.

🔬 Explore Our Independent Research Hub

From vaccine safety and cancer care to post-COVID protocols and chronic disease, our research team and Senior Fellows are producing science that challenges the status quo. The Research Hub is where you’ll find all our published studies, reviews, and groundbreaking monographs, all organized, accessible, and free to the public.

For more:

Inside the Vaccine Trials

http://  Approx. 1 hour 10 Min

Inside the Vaccine Trials

7/30/25

This film offers an intimate look into the lives of vaccine trial volunteers. These individuals came forward with hope and trust, only to encounter serious, lasting health complications.

www.vaccinetrialstories.com

Go to link for transcript

_______________

**Comment**

I don’t think the word ‘vaccine’ should be used in the title for this piece because it’s an experimental gene therapy injection in an ongoing clinical trial.  It is not a vaccine at all.  The only reason it can legally receive that title is because the CDC changed the definition of a vaccine so mRNA would fit.

Again, people receive different things.  Some one dose, some another dose, and some don’t get the mRNA at all but a placebo.  ‘The powers that be’ were and continue to be dishonest and have led people to believe everyone is getting an effective vaccine.

But the Covid injection is ineffective, doesn’t stop infection or transmission, but actually increases your risk of infection, myocarditis, blood clots, cancer, sets you up for prion disease, and causes more harm than good.

 It’s all a crock.
Buyer beware.

For more:

An Inconvenient Study

Henry Ford Medical Center, a Detroit-based heath group, issued a cease-and-desist against the film, claiming the study wasn’t published because it failed their scientific standards, not due to a cover-up. But Del Bigtree – a multi-decade children’s health advocate and RFK advisor – disagrees, and premiered the film on October 12 anyway.

https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/  Documentary Here  (Approx. 1 hour 20 min)

An Inconvenient Study

THIS COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING

In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. That study never saw the light of day… until now.

The Study

Here is what Henry Ford stated when The HighWire reached out to them for comment about the study:

“This report was not published because it did not meet the rigorous scientific standards we demand as a premier medical research institution. Data has consistently shown vaccinations are a safe and effective way to protect children against potentially life-altering diseases.”

And here is what Henry Ford has stated publicly about the study.

Key Findings of the Study:

Compared to unvaccinated children, those who received one or more vaccines had dramatically higher rates of chronic illness:

  • 329% more asthma
  • 203% more atopic disease
  • 496% more autoimmune disease
  • 453% more neurodevelopmental disorders
    • including 228% more developmental delays
    • and 347% more speech disorders

Go here for more and to hear Lawyer Aaron Siri’s congressional testimony.

Resources

For additional resources supporting the ideas in the film, check out:

For more:

Purposely Infecting People with AGS in the Name of ‘Climate Change’

https://www.frontpagemag.com/weaponizing-ticks-academics-propose-meat-allergy-to-fight-climate-change/

Weaponizing Ticks: Academics Propose Meat Allergy to Fight Climate Change

A new level of coercion in the climate war.

Article Excerpts:

Two researchers from Western Michigan University have proposed just that in a paper ominously titled “Beneficial Bloodsucking.” Published by the journal Bioethics in July, the paper argues that intentionally spreading alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) could be ethically defensible, and perhaps even necessary, because it reduces animal suffering and combats climate change. As the authors, Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth, put it:

“Because promoting tickborne AGS prevents something bad from happening, doesn’t violate anyone’s rights, and promotes virtuous action or character, it follows that promoting tickborne AGS is strongly pro tanto (‘to that extent’) morally obligatory.”

Really? According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), AGS “is a serious, potentially life-threatening allergy,” affecting “as many as 450,000 people.”

“Whatever excuse they may concoct to justify it,” notes Cameron English, director of biosciences at the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), “deliberately releasing ticks into the environment with the intention of making people sick is unethical because it interferes with the proper functioning of their bodies.” English adds that “Crutchfield and Hereth want to infect millions of people with AGS precisely because ‘it is extremely difficult for most human beings to … forego acting on their desire to eat meat.’”

(See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

If you remember, a WEF goon has already stated this previously as a solution for ‘climate change’, another very contentious subject, with many researchers stating the entire narrative is a scam.  Last year a peer-reviewed study showed that CO2 emissions in the earth’s atmosphere can not cause ‘global warming.’

And just to be clear, an expert states:

“I assert there is no connection whatsoever between climate change and CO2– it’s all a crock of crap, in my opinion.” ~ Dr. John Clauser, 2022 Nobel physics laureate

Also see this video of Dr. Niall McCrae on ‘The Lie of Cataclysmic, Anthropogenic Climate Change.”

Please note just where the ‘climate change’ agenda can lead…..
purposely infecting people so they are forced to eliminate all animal products from their life

The the ignorantly self-righteous statements by these scientists is unbelievably staggering:

  • promoting AGS prevents something bad from happening
  • doesn’t violate anyone’s rights
  • promotes virtuous action or character

Huh?

Do they even consider the possibility that people man become infected with other life-altering pathogens which are often in ticks?  As it stands, patients must go to specialized doctors even now to even receive proper treatment and must pay out of pocket.  Imagine a whopping does of AGS on top of it all!

Already, in the name of ‘climate change,’:

  • WHO is posturing itself to be able to declare a ‘climate emergency’ anytime they wish to lock down all of life on planet earth
  • JPMorgan states that private property may need to be seized by the federal government for corporations to advance “climate” initiatives
  • the current “energy transition” away from inexpensive, reliable and very clean conventional energy toward unconventional energies such as wind and solar power that are expensiveunreliable, and deeply problematic environmentally is best described by an article in the Manhattan Institute as an unrealistic delusion
  • two independent studies found intensely noisy offshore wind projects cause hearing loss in marine mammals, turtles, and fish and compromise their ability to navigate, avoid danger, detect predators, and find prey
  • go here to watch an informative video on the staggering amount of energy and resources required to build a single wind turbine.  According to this, there are 75,633 turbines covering 45 states plus Guam and Puerto Rico. Recently there’s been a slow down due to defects that according to manufacturers can affect up to 30% of turbines which can cause anything from fires to complete breakdowns where they fall to the ground
  • elevated humpback whale mortalities have occurred along the Atlantic coast from Maine through Florida coinciding with offshore operations
  • wind and solar farms only work 30% of the time, yet the delusions continue.
  • California serves as a prime example of a state that requires conventional energy to keep the fantasy afloat, yet proponents argue this will all be well given more time, more subsidies, more magical thinking, and more pixie dust
  • under the guise of reducing “methane emissions,” 13 WEF-infiltrated nations  have agreed to engineer global famine by abolishing agricultural production and shutting down all farms to ‘save the planet.’  The U.S. is one of those nations.
  • globalists’ fraudulent solutions to the purported climate crisis is Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) investing. A company’s ESG score is supposed to tell investors how socially conscious the company is, but recent scandals have revealed ESG is a scam.
If you wondered where the ‘climate’ narrative is going to go, wonder no more.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2025/05/15/red-meat-allergy-surges-as-wefs-human-engineering-blueprint-becomes-reality/  Gelatin-containing ‘vaccines’ have also been linked to causing severe anaphylaxis in some.  A few factoids:

For more on AGS: