Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

GBS as an Initial Manifestation of Lyme Disease: Diagnostic Challenges

https://www.cureus.com/articles/467640-guillain-barr-syndrome-as-the-initial-manifestation-of-lyme-disease-diagnostic-challenges

Guillain-Barré Syndrome as the Initial Manifestation of Lyme Disease: Diagnostic Challenges

Ahmed Elnour • Naveed Sultan • Abdul Monem • Khalid Ghalib

Published: March 20, 2026

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.105552

Peer-Reviewed

Cite this article as: Elnour A, Sultan N, Monem A, et al. (March 20, 2026) Guillain-Barré Syndrome as the Initial Manifestation of Lyme Disease: Diagnostic Challenges. Cureus 18(3): e105552. doi:10.7759/cureus.105552

Abstract

Lyme disease is a common tick-borne infection in the United States and Europe that may involve the nervous system during the disseminated stage. Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated polyneuropathy usually triggered by infection; however, its association with Borrelia burgdorferi is uncommon and can pose diagnostic challenges.

We report the case of a previously healthy 61-year-old female patient who presented with progressive ascending weakness and areflexia suggestive of GBS. During hospitalisation, she developed bilateral facial nerve palsy, prompting further evaluation. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings and electrophysiological studies supported acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, while serologic testing confirmed Lyme disease. The patient received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) followed by intravenous ceftriaxone and achieved complete neurological recovery.

This case emphasizes the need to consider Lyme disease in patients presenting with acute inflammatory neuropathy, particularly in endemic regions, as early diagnosis and targeted therapy can significantly improve outcomes.

_____________

**Comment**

The researchers state that the association between GBS with Lyme is uncommon, yet nobody is counting cases!  How can they know?

Answer: they don’t.  They shouldn’t state things that are pure conjecture.

For more:

Study Identifies 86 Serious Neuropsychiatric Safety Signals Linked to COVID-19 Shots

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-identifies-86-serious

BREAKING: Study Identifies 86 Serious Neuropsychiatric Safety Signals Linked to COVID-19 Vaccination

CDC/FDA safety thresholds breached for 86 adverse events including dementia, schizophrenia, suicidal and homicidal thoughts, stroke, psychosis, depression, cognitive impairment, delusions, and more.

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The study by Thorp et al titled, Association between COVID-19 Vaccination and Neuropsychiatric Conditions, was just uploaded to the Preprints.org preprint server. They analyzed VAERS data from January 1990 through December 2024 and identified alarming increases in 86 adverse events related to brain function, behavior, and cognition following COVID-19 mRNA injection:

Introduction: COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are known to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and could potentially cause a myriad of unintended adverse effects. The purpose of this study is to explore potential associations between vaccination and neuropsychiatric conditions.

Methods: Data were collected from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The CDC/FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was queried from January 1, 1990, to December 27, 2024, for adverse events (AEs) involving neuropsychiatric complications following COVID-19 vaccination. The timeframe included 420 months for all vaccines except COVID-19 vaccines which have been available to the public for only 48 of the 420 months (from January 1, 2021, to December 27, 2024). Proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) were calculated by time comparing AEs after COVID-19 vaccination to those after influenza vaccination and to those after all other vaccines. The CDC/FDA stipulates a safety concern if a PRR is ≥ 2.

Results: Comparing COVID-19 vaccination to influenza vaccinations, the CDC/FDA’s safety signals (PRR, 95% confidence interval, p-value, Z-score) were breached for the following combinations: 47 AEs associated with cognitive impairment (PRR: 118, 95% CI: 87.2-160, p < 0.0001, Z-score: 30.9); 28 AEs associated with general psychiatric illness (PRR: 115, 95% CI: 85.1-156, p < 0.0001, Z-score: 30.8); and 11 AEs associated with suicide/homicide (PRR: 80.1, 95% CI: 57.3-112, p < 0.0001, Z-score: 25.7). Likewise, when comparing COVID-19 vaccination to all other vaccines except COVID-19, the safety signals were also breached for the following: 47 AEs associated with cognitive impairment (PRR: 26.8, 95% CI: 19.8-36.1, p < 0.0001, Z-score: 21.5); 28 AEs associated with general psychiatric illness (PRR: 28.6, 95% CI: 21.2-38.6, p < 0.0001, Z-score: 21.9); and 11 AEs associated with suicide/homicide (PRR: 14.0, 95% CI: 10.3-19.0, p < 0.0001, Z-score: 16.8).

Conclusions: There are alarming safety signals regarding neuropsychiatric conditions following COVID-19 vaccination, compared to the influenza vaccinations alone and to all other vaccinations combined. These data raise concerns about long-term consequences, including continued cognitive decline, dementia, and neuropsychiatric morbidity and mortality. An immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination is warranted.  (See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

Psychosis, schizophrenia, delusion, delirium, and brain injury, along with Alzheimer’s depression, sleep disorders, and hemorrhagic stroke all listed…..

Why these kill shots are still on the market defies ALL logic and sanity.

For more:

 

WHO Teams With Singapore Firm Tied to Pfizer, Bill Gates to Roll Out Global Vaccine Passports

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/global-vaccine-passports-who-partner-singapore-firm-pfizer-bill-gates-temasek

Vaccine Passport

WHO Teams With Singapore Firm Tied to Pfizer, Bill Gates to Roll Out Global Vaccine Passports

The WHO is partnering with Temasek, a firm owned by the Singapore government that participated in a $250 million investment in BioNTech in June 2020 — a few months before BioNTech released a COVID-19 vaccine in conjunction with Pfizer. Temasek will help the WHO develop “interoperable digital health wallets.”

WHO logo and vaccine passport on cellphone

Five years after digital vaccine passports were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) is partnering with an investment firm linked to COVID-19 vaccine maker BioNTech and the Gates Foundation to roll out “interoperable digital health wallets.”

The WHO announced earlier this week that it is partnering with Temasek, a firm owned by the Singapore government that participated in a $250 million investment in BioNTech in June 2020 — a few months before BioNTech released a COVID-19 vaccine in conjunction with Pfizer.

The initiative “builds on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, which demonstrated the urgency of reliable, verifiable digital health documentation,” the WHO said.

The initiative will begin with digital international certificates of vaccination or prophylaxis and will later expand to “broader personal health summaries.” It will be piloted in the 11 member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to develop a “replicable model” for potential export to other countries.

The initiative is a result of last year’s amendments to the WHO’s  International Health Regulations (IHR), which called for “globally recognized digital health certificates.”

Kee Kirk Chuen, Temasek’s head of Health & Well-being, said the COVID-19 pandemic “showed how important it is for health records to be trusted, verifiable and able to travel with people across borders.”

But Natalie Winters, co-host of “Bannon’s War Room,” countered that the WHO is attempting to formalize what was once touted as a temporary response to the pandemic.

“During COVID, digital health verification systems determined whether people could travel, work, or enter public spaces based off vaccination status,” Winters wrote on Substack. “Those systems were justified as temporary. Now they are being formalized into something much broader and far more durable.”

Dr. David Bell, a public health physician, biotech consultant and senior scholar at the Brownstone Institute, said private interests are driving the WHO’s initiative.

“The WHO is required to concentrate on vaccine passports as they are important from an investment viewpoint to its major funders, who fund the WHO through voluntary specified funding — meaning the WHO is required to follow the directions of the funder.”

Bell said major WHO funders, including the Gates Foundation, “have direct financial interests in increasing the use of both vaccines and digital platforms.”

COVID Justice Resolution: Sign the Resolution

‘A clear conflict of interest’

Winters argued that Temasek’s involvement in the WHO’s initiative “adds a clear conflict of interest.

In June 2020, Temasek and other investors poured $250 million into BioNTech, a German biotechnology company. According to a BioNTech press release, the investment would boost the company’s efforts to develop “patient-specific immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer and infectious diseases.”

Reuters noted at the time that BioNTech was developing an “experimental vaccine against the coronavirus with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer.’’

According to a 2021 Asia Business Council report, Temasek’s investment in BioNTech “is just one example of how the government-owned but private-sector-oriented company went full out as an investor and a steward to fight the coronavirus.”

On its website, Temasek states that “sustainability is at the core of everything we do.”

But the company’s current and former investment portfolio reveals an extensive history of investing in pharmaceutical companies and digital health providers.

In 2021, Temasek, through its digital identity subsidiary Affinidi, developed and piloted Unifier, a universal verification system for authenticating COVID-19 vaccination and test results across different QR code standards.

That same year, Temasek helped lead a $700 million investment round for Chinese pharmaceutical company Abogen Biosciences, with the funds used to advance the company’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine candidate to late-phase trials.

In 2010, Temasek formed a joint venture with U.S. pharma company Emergent BioSolutions to develop a “broad spectrum pandemic flu vaccine and therapeutic.”

Temasek has investments in Clover Biopharmaceuticals, a Chinese company that developed candidate COVID-19 vaccines, Celltrion Inc., a South Korean biopharmaceutical firm that developed therapies for COVID-19, and Novotech, a clinical research organization that specializes in clinical trials for drugs and vaccines.

Temasek is also an investor in major tech and financial firms that are involved in health-related technologies.

This includes Amazon — which, through Amazon Web Services, is involved with the Vaccination Credential Initiative, a backer of the SMART Health Card, which several states and countries used as a vaccine passport during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Docket, a digital vaccine record app, also uses SMART Health Card technology in some states. Nathan Scott, Docket’s chief technical officer, was previously affiliated with Amazon and Amazon Web Services.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, BlackRock— one of the world’s “Big Three” asset managers and a shareholder in COVID-19 vaccine makers Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson — was among the top 10 shareholders in dozens of corporations mandating vaccines for their employees.

One of those companies is Mastercard. During the pandemic, Mastercard supported the Good Health Pass vaccine passport initiative, with backing by the Gates Foundation-linked ID2020 Alliance. Temasek is an investor in Mastercard.

In 2021, Mastercard promoted technology to track people’s “personal carbon allowance.”

Bell said that while it is reasonable for an investment firm like Temasek to invest in pharmaceutical companies, “it obviously should exclude them from participating with WHO in activities that directly improve their subsequent return on investment.”

“This is a really basic conflict of interest that would be a no-go for any ethical public health program, as their duty as an investment house is to maximize return on investment from the companies they have invested in. This is obviously likely to be contrary to what populations need to improve health,” Bell said.

The Singaporean government was a “pioneer” in the development of COVID-19 tracking and tracing apps, according to a 2020 article in Media International Australia. The government later exported the technology to other countries.

Temasek’s ties to Gates Foundation, Gates-linked Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance

Temasek also maintains direct collaborative ties with the Gates Foundation — and the Gates-linked Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

For instance, the Philanthropy Asia Alliance — Temasek’s charitable arm — lists the Gates Foundation as one of its early core members, according to Bloomberg.

In 2022, Temasek invested in Select, a fund launched under Breakthrough Energy Ventures, a climate-focused investor founded by GatesYahoo! Finance reported at the time that Temasek was “already an existing co-investor to several other Gates-backed ventures.”

In 2024, Breakthrough led investment in “climate vaccines” to reduce carbon emissions from cows.

Last year, the Gates Foundation opened a Singapore office — which Gates announced at the Philanthropy Asia Summit organized by Temasek Trust’s Philanthropy Asia Alliance.

Temasek has also partnered with Gavi on vaccination programs in Southeast Asia. According to a 2025 Gavi press release, Temasek partnered with the Clinton Health Access Initiative and the UBS Optimus Foundation on a $4.5 million initiative “to reach zero-dose and under-immunized children” in Indonesia.

The Gates Foundation funded Gavi’s launch in 1999 and holds a permanent seat on its board. Gavi is listed by the WHO as an official “stakeholder.”

Last year, Temasek’s Philanthropy Asia Alliance helped launch the Climate and Health Funders Coalition — along with the Gates Foundation,  Rockefeller Foundation and Bloomberg Philanthropies. In 2024, Temasek, the Rockefeller Foundation and BlackRock joined a new infrastructure investment initiative in Southeast Asia.

“Increasing sales of vaccines directly improves return on investment where such investments exist in vaccine manufacturers, such as is the case of the Gates Foundation and its owners,” Bell said. “And it improves profits for private pharmaceutical corporations that contribute to the public-private partnerships.”

Digital ID ‘the end of privacy, anonymity and liberty’

Before the U.S. exited the WHO, which was announced last year and  formalized in January, the U.S. was its largest individual funder. The next two? The Gates Foundation and Gavi.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO repeatedly pushed for a pandemic agreement or treaty — which it achieved last year — and amendments to the IHR. The WHO passed a set of IHR amendments in 2024. They took effect in September 2025.

Those amendments included a recommendation for the development of digital health certificates. The WHO cited the amendments when announcing its collaboration with Temasek.

In 2023, the WHO and the European Commission — the executive branch of the European Union — launched a “landmark digital health partnership” marking the beginning of the WHO Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN).

The digital passes that the WHO will develop in partnership with Temasek will use the GDHCN standard.

Independent journalist James Roguski said he warned two years ago that the WHO’s efforts to pass the IHR amendments would lead to a push for global health passes.

“Nations may be somewhat constrained in their abuse of their own citizens by their constitutions, charters of rights, or laws,” Roguski said. “But numerous articles within the IHR clearly state that sovereign nations are absolutely free to disregard and abuse the rights, freedoms and health of travelers who may be visiting from other countries.”

Tim Hinchliffe, editor of The Sociable, said that for Gates and other unelected globalists, globally interoperable vaccine passports serve a couple of purposes.

“First off, there’s a lot of money in getting everyone in the world to get injected with their products. It’s a great return on investment. Secondly, vaccine passports further the agenda to get everybody in the world pegged to a digital identity scheme,” Hinchliffe said.

He cited a 2022 World Economic Forum report acknowledging that vaccine passports are a type of digital identity.

“With that type of power and influence, the powerful interest groups then set up their digital control grid, because mandating proof of vaccination means mandating digital ID. When digital ID is mandated, it is the end of privacy, anonymity and liberty,” Hinchliffe said.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

_____________

Many articles have come out on Gates’ involvement and how he’s financed so many things controlling messaging. He’s no philanthropist!

For more:

‘Disinformation Dozen’ Targeted by Government, Maligned by Media. Where Are They Today?

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/disinformation-dozen-targeted-government-maligned-media-where-are-they-today/

The ‘Disinformation Dozen’: Targeted by Government, Maligned by Media. Where Are They Today?

It’s been six years since the Center for Countering Digital Hate published the “Disinformation Dozen’ list of “leading online anti-vaxxers.” The Defender interviewed six of the 12 people on the list. They shared how being included on the list affected their businesses, their relationships and their constitutional right to freedom of speech.

six members and word "disinformation"

In March 2021, one year into the COVID-19 pandemic, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) published its list of “leading online anti-vaxxers,” dubbed “The Disinformation Dozen.”

The impact was immediate.

Social media giants began deplatforming some of the people on the list.

Key Biden administration officials publicly referenced the list and its members, and accused them of spreading dangerous “misinformation” and “disinformation.”

The “Twitter Files,” released in 2022 and 2023, showed that Big Tech worked with the government to censor not only those on the “Disinformation Dozen” list, but also anyone with a significant online following who published content that contradicted the official COVID-19 narrative.

That included Children’s Health Defense (CHD), which on Aug. 17, 2022, was kicked off major social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram.

CHD wasn’t on the “Disinformation Dozen” list — but its founder and then-chairman, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., was.

“When the ‘Disinformation Dozen’ list was published, Kennedy was still chairman of CHD,” said CHD CEO Mary Holland. “Silencing his voice meant silencing ours — because at the time, his name was synonymous with that of CHD, the organization he founded and led.”

When Kennedy left CHD to run for U.S. president, it was no longer possible for the government and the CCDH to censor him. “His social media channels were restored,” Holland said. “But to this day, CHD is still being censored.”

Much has changed since 2021. Kennedy is now U.S. health secretary, leading the Trump administration’s “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) agenda.

Many of the “Disinformation Dozen” continue to actively write, produce documentaries and advocate for health freedom.

Social media platforms and CEOs, including Mark Zuckerberg, have since acknowledged that they censored the list’s members at the Biden administration’s request.

Some media outlets have walked back previous negative coverage of the list’s members.

What about the originator of the “Disinformation Dozen” list? Internal documents leaked in 2024 showed that CCDH planned to launch “black ops” against Kennedy. The group has been linked to the Democratic Party and to “dark money” networks — including to billionaire financier George Soros and his Open Society Foundations.

CCDH is now the subject of a congressional investigation. Its CEO, Imran Ahmed — tied to key figures in the U.K. government, including some with links to financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — is facing deportation from the U.S.

This week, six of the list’s members — Charlene Bollinger, Erin ElizabethKevin JenkinsSayer JiBen Tapper and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny — spoke to The Defender about how inclusion on the list impacted their lives and livelihoods, the extent to which they continue to face censorship today, the investigations targeting CCDH, and lawsuits they are part of which are related to the censorship they faced.

Other ”Disinformation Dozen” members, including Kennedy; holistic psychiatrist  Dr. Kelly Brogan; physician Dr. Joseph Mercola; OB-GYN physician Dr. Christiane Northrup; and educator, activist and health advocate Rizza Islam, could not be reached for comment. Dr. Rashid Buttar died in 2023.

Several of the list’s members — and Holland — will participate in a MAHA Action Media Hub event Wednesday on censorship and repression.

‘Like a witch hunt’

Erin Elizabeth, founder of Health Nut News, said being included on the “Disinformation Dozen” list was “like a witch hunt.”

“I’ve been banned five times on Instagram,” she said. “I’ve been banned so many times on TikTok I’ve lost count. The last time was for simply quoting Kennedy. It was tragic to lose millions of followers on Facebook alone, let alone six figures on my other platforms, some of which I’d had over 20 years.”

Elizabeth suggested that the list’s members were deplatformed in a coordinated manner. “They wiped us out, most of us, within a half hour of one another,” she said.

Sayer Ji, chairman of the Global Wellness Forum and founder of GreenMedInfo, said the CCDH report “was not journalism. It was a targeting document.” He said that within weeks of its publication, “I was deplatformed across YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest … GreenMedInfo lost most of its organic traffic overnight.”

Ben Tapper, a chiropractor and host of “Dr. Ben Tapper’s Podcast,” said he was targeted soon after a speech he gave in Omaha, Nebraska, opposing COVID-19 mask mandates.

“After that speech, my social media was reaching millions of people per month, and we were raising funds for our documentary,” Tapper said. “Then President Biden called us out in a press hearing, and all my social media was deleted.

Tapper subsequently faced five account deletions on Instagram and bans on TikTok and Twitter — now X.

Sherri Tenpenny, a physician and host of “The Tenpenny Files” podcast, said she “lost hundreds of thousands of followers on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Podbean.”

Kevin Jenkins, vice president of the lobbying firm Right Turn Strategies, said he was deplatformed from Instagram, Facebook and Twitter for “a long period of time.”

‘Designed to create a chilling effect’

Deplatforming was not limited to social media platforms. Tapper and Tenpenny said they were banned from financial platforms, including PayPal and Venmo.

Charlen Bollinger, founder of The Truth About Vaccines and The Truth About Cancer (TTAC), said Google “has strangled” her ability to reach the public through her email lists.

Several of the list’s members said inclusion on the list harmed them professionally.

Bollinger said the censorship “has disrupted our business to the point where we have really struggled financially, which has resulted in our inability to produce and reach millions of people.”

“Immediately our income was cut down considerably, and I had to let my own aunt go, who had worked for me for some time and is a single mother,” Elizabeth said. “I couldn’t afford to keep her on.”

Tapper said that when the “Disinformation Dozen” list was published, “we were slandered falsely in the media, I lost patients in my clinic and received messages from thousands of people stating that I was a threat to public health.”

Several of the list’s members said they were subjected to personal attacks and harm to their personal and family lives. According to Tapper:

“I lost close friends who thought I was on the wrong side of history. My home was broken into, my clinic was vandalized, I received death threats, my phone and my wife’s phone were hacked. We received hundreds of texts per day.

“My clinic was vandalized, I had people protesting at my office, my truck was vandalized, and I had physical altercations in public. Family members disowned us, separated themselves.”

Ji said the “Disinformation Dozen” list accomplished multiple objectives for CCDH.

“The financial impact was severe and sustained. But beyond the economics, the designation was designed to create a chilling effect on anyone who might cite our research or collaborate with us. It worked, for a time,” he said.

Holland said CHD is still subject to this chilling effect. She said:

“We continue to endure an unprecedented level of censorship across search engines and social media, including Facebook and Instagram, where our accounts, which had millions of followers, have not been restored.

“This censorship hurts our organization. But worse than that, it prevents the public from accessing scientific and medical information, thus depriving Americans of the right to make critical decisions about their health, based on true informed consent.”

‘Underlying infrastructure of suppression remains largely intact’

Five years on, a new administration is in government, and the public climate surrounding vaccines and vaccine safety has shifted.

But several members of the “Disinformation Dozen” said they remain censored on most social media platforms and that accounts that were restored reach a smaller audience.

“Among the channels we lost, most recently YouTube reinstated our TTAC channel with 164,000 subscribers. But this channel is heavily shadowbanned, so our community can’t find our films when we release them,” Bollinger said.

Ji said YouTube restored his channels late last year, “acknowledging that the content had never violated their community guidelines.”

“That acknowledgment, quiet as it was, is its own indictment of what happened in 2021,” Ji said. But Ji said he is “still navigating suppression in search, and the shadow of the CCDH designation lingers in ways that are difficult to quantify but unmistakable in practice.”

Jenkins said he feels “without a shadow of a doubt” that he is “still being hampered.” His Instagram account, which previously had about 30,000 followers, has lost many of those followers. “It’s never allowed me to grow,” he said.

Tapper described a similar experience with Instagram. “I feel like my Instagram account isn’t allowing for growth, and every month I lose anywhere from 700 to 800 followers. It has been that way for a couple of years,” he said.

“We have lost at least 1 million followers and subscribers,” Bollinger said. “And while we still have 1.1 million followers on Facebook, 152,000 followers on Instagram and 66,000 followers on X, we can’t reach them due to the intense censorship.”

Some “Disinformation Dozen” members suggested that shadowbanning is applied unevenly — to specific posts or to stifle accounts showing signs of growth.

“I feel like certain posts are being shadowbanned and censored,” Tapper said. “It all depends on what I post. I feel like if you are over the target, you will be shadowbanned or censored.”

Elizabeth said that every time she gains some traction, “they ban my page and I have to start over. This has happened numerous times on every platform except X.”

Tapper and Elizabeth said that only X has restored their previously banned accounts. According to Tenpenny, though, shadowbanning continues to take place on YouTube, where the accounts of YouTube users who interview her are removed, and on X, despite the free speech promises of the platform’s owner, Elon Musk.

“I was reinstated on X [but] we are severely shadowbanned — we’ve only grown by a few thousand followers in 2025, even though I’ve been speaking and have been a guest on huge platforms,” Tenpenny said.

Jenkins said he is engaged in a daily effort to “work around the algorithms” and discuss topics such as chronic illness.

Several of the list’s members, including Bollinger, Elizabeth, Ji, Tapper and Tenpenny, said they have been able to bypass censorship on Substack, where they have built a substantial audience.

Elizabeth said she has secured a book deal. Ji is working on a book examining the links between Epstein, Bill Gates and pandemic preparedness.

The Bollingers just released a film, “Censored: The Fight for the First Amendment,” which “exposes the unholy alliance between government power, Big Tech monopolies, and billionaire-funded NGOs.”

“Things have changed in our ability to talk about these things publicly without the fear of being attacked as we were during the COVID years,” Bollinger said.

“That is the thing the deplatformers consistently underestimate: you cannot algorithmically delete a relationship built on substance over two decades,” Ji said. He warned that “the underlying infrastructure of suppression remains largely intact.”

Ongoing lawsuits challenge censorship tied to the ‘Disinformation Dozen’ list

Today, several of the list’s members are involved in legal challenges related to the censorship they experienced. This includes CHD’s antitrust lawsuit against the Trusted News Initiative — a partnership formed by Reuters, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, BBC and others.

The lawsuit, filed in 2023, alleges that the Trusted News Initiative violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by collectively colluding with tech giants to censor independent news outlets in a move designed specifically to cripple the smaller publishers’ ability to compete.

Last year, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a statement of interest supporting the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which include CHD, Bollinger, Mercola and Tapper.

In a lawsuit filed last year, several of the list’s members — Elizabeth, Islam, Ji, Northrup, Tapper and Tenpenny — sued CCDH and Ahmed, Google, Meta and X, and several agencies and officials from the current and previous administrations.

Ji said the lawsuit “challenges the government’s role in coordinating censorship of protected speech.”

In another case, Bollinger sued Google, Meta, X and several federal agencies in December 2024, “for using social media platforms as the tools to silence us.”

Ji said he is also involved in a legal case in the U.K. seeking his immediate arrest and confiscation of his equipment. He described this as “a situation in which my protected American speech was cited in foreign criminal proceedings.”

The list’s members welcomed the congressional investigation and deportation proceedings CCDH and Ahmed face.

“The effort to deport Imran Ahmed is, from where I sit, a measure of how thoroughly the architecture he helped construct has been exposed,” Ji said. “The vindication is real, but it comes at a cost that the people targeted have already paid.”

Tapper called Ahmed “a serious threat” to free speech and said the American people “deserve transparency about the networks, funding and influence” behind CCDH.

“While we are happy to see Imran Ahmed and the CCDH in this fire, and hopefully removed from the U.S., he needs to also face justice for his crimes,” Bollinger said.

The list’s members dismissed acknowledgements by Zuckerberg and Big Tech platforms about the censorship they engaged in.

The admission did not come with accountability or restoration of what was lost,” Ji said. “It came as a casual acknowledgment in a changed political environment. That should trouble everyone regardless of where they sit politically. If the infrastructure exists to suppress speech at government request, it will be used again,” Ji said.

Bollinger said she was hopeful that Zuckerberg and Google were sincere when they claimed they “targeted and censored us and others like us only because ‘the government made me do it,’” but added, “the proof is in the pudding. We are still being targeted and censored.”

Jenkins, who is politically active in New Jersey, credited Kennedy with helping to deliver a “seismic shift” in how the public discusses topics such as vaccines today.

“I speak to a lot of people daily, and the fear that they had about discussing it prior has changed,” Jenkins said. “I’m very encouraged about the work that Kennedy is doing. He’s up against a Herculean group of people that want to continue to lie to Americans and lie to the world, and they’re fighting him at all levels.”

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

_____________

For more:

COVID Shot Stroke Cover-Up And A Public Message to Anthony Fauci

https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-biden-white-house-covid?

BREAKING: Biden White House COVID Stroke Cover-Up Exposed

A Pattern of Institutional Deception Finally Revealed in Stunning New Email Revelations

Newly released government documents confirm that Biden White House officials directly edited CDC messaging on COVID-19 vaccine safety in January 2023 — changing the description of a stroke risk signal in elderly Americans from “moderately elevated” to “slightly elevated,” removing the words “potential risk” entirely, and instructing health officials they “don’t want to see this document again.”

All of this happened while the same administration was aggressively pushing booster uptake in the very age group affected, and while its Surgeon General was publicly accusing independent health researchers of spreading harmful disinformation for raising the exact safety questions officials were quietly suppressing internally.

This is not a hypothetical scandal. It is documented. And for those of us who lived through the coordinated destruction of our platforms, our reputations, and our livelihoods for asking these questions in public, it is a confirmation that arrives with the full weight of vindication — and the full fury of unresolved injustice.

I was one of those researchers. And this story lands differently when you have been named a public enemy for telling the truth the government was simultaneously editing into silence.  (See link for Ji’s exposé on a purposeful bureaucratic editorial operation)

https://substack.com/home/post/p-192014160

A Public Message to Anthony Fauci

Let Me Help You Remember What Went Wrong.

In what can only be described as a New York Times public image rehabilitation attempt, former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci comes across as a Pontius Pilate – his hands washed of any responsibility for his central role as a, if not the primary, driver of public health policies that nearly destroyed the United States of America.

Dr. Fauci, we remember. We ALL remember. Here is my message to help YOU remember. Let’s start with how you helped the Biden administration threaten ALL of our jobs, but the article does not mention that. It does not mention your central role in the lockdown – in fact,

you flatly deny that your actions or policies led to any school closings or factories shut down. How is it that governors across the U.S. decided “essential” and “non-essential” businesses, and you stood by and never protested?

In August 2020 you said publicly: “If someone refuses the vaccine in the general public, then there’s nothing you can do about that. You cannot force someone to take a vaccine.” Then on September 10, 2021 — the day after Biden announced the OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard covering ~80–100 million workers — you told PBS: “I myself am quite favorably impressed by that and feel strongly that that is what we should be doing.” On November 4, 2021, testifying before the Senate HELP Committee, when Sen. Romney asked directly whether mandates would save lives, you said: “We know that vaccines absolutely save lives. And we know that mandates work.”

Also on record in a Michael Specter audiobook, Summer 2021: “It’s been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated. It was played back to you at the June 2024 hearing. You did not retract it.

The mandate had no testing option for federal workers or healthcare workers — it was vaccinate or lose your job. You were the Chief Medical Advisor sitting in the White House at the time. You did not object.

We all remember, also, your key role as a driver of the lockdown.

  • You sent Dr. Clifford Lane — your NIAID deputy — to China with the WHO Joint Mission in February 2020
  • Lane returned and wrote: “China has demonstrated this infection can be controlled, albeit at great cost. This is the bottom line.”
  • Lane told you directly: “From what I saw in China, we may have to go to as extreme a degree of social distancing to help bring our outbreak under control”
  • You testified he had “every reason to believe” Lane’s evaluation
  • You then admitted: social distancing “even by somewhat difficult means” involving “essentially the entire community” was possible in the U.S.

Your methodological problems:

  1. Lane visited after China had already locked down — he could only observe what was happening, not whether the lockdown caused the decline
  2. Chinese data was demonstrably unreliable — WHO had tailored confidentiality forms “to China’s terms” (FOIA-obtained emails, Judicial Watch, March 2021) and a January 2020 WHO epidemiological analysis was marked “strictly confidential”
  3. The WHO-China Joint Mission report itself was controlled: all activities were “arranged by the Chinese Government’s National Health Commission” (per a Feb. 15, 2020 internal WHO email)

(See link for Weiler’s chronology all things fraudulently Fauci)

______________

**Comment**

It’s beyond time for vindication of those who were right all along, and accountability for those who pushed unscientific, fraudulent, and dangerous COVID measures that were ineffective and even deadly.

For more: