Archive for the ‘Treatment’ Category

Facial Nerve Dysfunction After Treatment For Lyme Disease

https://danielcameronmd.com/facial-nerve-dysfunction-after-treatment-lyme-disease/

Facial nerve dysfunction after treatment for Lyme disease

By Dr. Daniel Cameron

facial-nerve-dysfunction-lyme-disease

Some individuals with Facial Nerve Palsy (Bell’s palsy) have reportedly had facial nerve dysfunction, as long as one year after antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease. Some suffer from synkinesis, where patients present with unwanted contractions of the muscles of the face during attempted movement. They may notice forceful eye closure when they attempt to smile or other muscle spasms during routine facial movements.

In their study, Wormser and colleagues found that 6 of the 11 Lyme disease patients (54.5%) suffered from facial nerve dysfunction an average of 13.1 months following the onset of treatment with corticosteroids.¹

  • 52-year-old man with “tearing of left eye when eating (Bogorad’s syndrome); mild residual weakness left side.”
  • 51-year-old man with “mild residual left sided weakness; dryness left eye; after speaking a lot, left sided facial muscles feel abnormal.”
  • 56-year-old man with “narrowed palpebral fissure right eye; dry mouth; sensation of muscles around right eye being squeezed; tearing of right eye; twitching of the area between the eyes on the forehead; new dimple right cheek; intermittent lisp.”
  • 25-year-old man with “narrowed palpebral fissure left eye; reduced forehead movement; right sided jaw discomfort with eating; tearing of the left eye when eating (Bogorad’s syndrome).”
  • 61-year-old man with “narrowed palpebral fissure right eye; difficulty whistling; right eye discharge at night.”
  • 70-year-old woman who had “surgical facial nerve decompression nearly 3 months after onset of the LDFP (Lyme disease facial palsy).”

“Facial synkinesis presents following injury to the facial nerve and manifests as involuntary movement during volitional or spontaneous movement. This phenomenon may become clinically apparent 3 to 4 months following facial nerve injury,” wrote Shokri et al.²

Additionally, LeWitt described a case of hemifacial spasm (HFS) from Lyme disease and concluded that “Because its diagnosis can be occult (hidden) and antibiotic therapy can be both diagnostic and therapeutic, Lyme disease should be a consideration for cases of HFS.”³

Ramsey and colleagues examined acute peripheral facial palsy (APFP) in Lyme disease patients and found that “10% of patients with APFP testing positive for Lyme disease may be an underestimate, since several other studies in endemic areas have reported rates varying from 14.7% to 33%.” The authors did not indicate how many of their patients had incomplete eyelid closure or abnormal facial movement from aberrant regeneration.4

“We recommend screening patients with APFP for associated and treatable factors, especially Lyme disease in regions where the disease is endemic.”4

References:
  1. Wormser GP, McKenna D, Scavarda C, Karmen C. Outcome of facial palsy from Lyme disease in prospectively followed patients who had received corticosteroids. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. Aug 2018;91(4):336-338. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.03.016
  2. Shokri T, Azizzadeh B, Ducic Y. Modern Management of Facial Nerve Disorders. Semin Plast Surg. Nov 2020;34(4):277-285. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1721824
  3. LeWitt TM. Hemifacial Spasm From Lyme Disease: Antibiotic Treatment Points to the Cause. Clin Neuropharmacol. Nov/Dec 2016;39(6):329-330. doi:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000193
  4. Ramsey DJ, Haas LP, Tucker SM. Long-term Outcome After Acute Peripheral Facial Palsy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 27 2022;doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000002134

For more:

Webinar: What’s the Best Chronic Lyme Treatment For You

https://rawlsmd.com/webinars/whats-the-best-chronic-lyme-treatment-for-you/?

Dr. Bill Rawls
Co-Founder and Medical Director at Vital Plan

Jenny Buttaccio
Editorial Director at Vital Plan

What’s the Best Chronic Lyme Treatment for You?

Treating chronic Lyme disease can feel like playing a wild game of whack-a-mole: You keep attacking your symptoms as they pop up with the latest and greatest therapies, yet the fatigue, pain, brain fog, and more keep coming back.

Fortunately, there’s a more strategic and effective way to find relief from Lyme, and Dr. Bill Rawls — author of the bestselling book Unlocking Lyme — can help you find it during his new live webinar.

Join Dr. Rawls to hear his reviews of the most popular Lyme treatments available and reveal each of the treatment’s strengths and shortcomings. By the end of the webinar, you’ll understand what to try for symptom relief, what works best for addressing the underlying causes of illness, and everything in between.

PLUS: Don’t miss an exclusive gift for webinar attendees, and have your questions ready for a LIVE Q&A on Lyme disease treatments with Dr. Rawls.

RESERVE MY SEAT »

In this webinar, Dr. Rawls will also discuss:

• The 6 essential components of any successful Lyme therapy

• Why killing the microbes associated with Lyme is only part of the solution

• The 3 keys to choosing a treatment option

• Dr. Rawls’ treatment rankings by safety, effectiveness, and price

• What you should know about natural and conventional therapies for both short-term relief and long-term recovery

• Numerous insights and answers during the LIVE Q&A

Bill Rawls, M.D., is a physician and leading expert in Lyme disease, integrative health, and herbal medicine. In the middle of his successful medical career, Dr. Rawls’ life was interrupted by Lyme disease. In his journey to overcome it, he explored nearly every treatment possible – from conventional medicine to a range of alternative therapies. In the more than 12 years since his recovery, Dr. Rawls has helped thousands of patients find their path to healing from Lyme disease and chronic illness. He is the author of the bestselling books Unlocking Lyme and The Cellular Wellness Solution, and the Medical Director of RawlsMD.com and Vital Plan®, an online holistic health company and Certified B Corporation®.

Seeking to Unlock the Mysteries of Lyme Arthritis

https://www.lymedisease.org/unlock-mysteries-lyme-athritis/

Seeking to unlock the mysteries of Lyme arthritis

By Richard Harth
Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University

A nature lover from early childhood, Karie Behm found peace and renewal through hiking and cross-country running. She spent much of her time exploring the forested terrain of her native Kansas, as well as Minnesota and Colorado, during family vacations.

She did not suspect that on one unremarkable day, microscopic, corkscrew-like pathogens known as spirochetes would stealthily invade her body, causing a succession of painful, debilitating and perplexing disease symptoms. It would take physicians over six years to untangle the mystery.

Behm had contracted Lyme disease, following a tick bite.

A recent doctoral graduate from the School of Molecular Sciences and the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, Behm has devoted her energies to unlocking some of the secrets of Lyme disease, a tenacious ailment affecting some 500,000 Americans every year.

“People have finally come to the realization that Lyme disease has been around a long time and has been affecting a lot of people who have been chronically ill and couldn’t get help,” Behm says. “Patient advocacy groups have been working tirelessly for the last 20 years to try to bring attention to this problem. It’s not a little thing and it’s not a joke. It can affect you your entire life.”

Studying the disease that debilitated her

Behm came to ASU in 2016, with a personal goal in mind — to study the disease causing her often incapacitating symptoms. A highly motivated scholar and researcher, she managed to convince her advisor, Debra Hansen, of the importance of studying this underreported and misunderstood ailment.

Behm and Hansen, both researchers with the Biodesign Center for Applied Structural Discovery (CASD), then consulted Petra Fromme, director of the center and an authority on the structural characterization of proteins, including those associated with infectious disease.

The team hatched a plan to study Lyme arthritis, a pervasive symptom found in many Lyme disease cases. “Petra loves students who share her passion,” Behm says.

“During my first interview with her, she got really excited about how the lab’s structural techniques could be applied to Lyme disease.” Prior to her arrival at the lab, Behm, working independently, had already completed an NSF proposal to study Lyme disease.

The project gathered momentum when Behm conducted a literature search, identifying a suite of proteins believed to decorate the surface of Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterial parasite transmitted by a tick bite that causes Lyme disease.

Drawing on a recent award from ASU Women and Philanthropy, the team is advancing its efforts by using a powerful method known as cryo-EM to observe membrane proteins found on the surface of the Borrelia parasite in stunning detail.

A remarkable discovery

Eureka moment: Behm’s negative stain electron microscopy image, offering the first visual evidence of a membrane pore identified by the researchers. This pore may provide an attractive therapeutic target for future drug design against Lyme arthritis. Photo courtesy Biodesign Institute.

The research has already led to a remarkable discovery. One such membrane protein, known as BBA57, binds to copies of itself to form a complex at the membrane surface. The result appears to be a portal to and from the cell’s interior — a pore.

The discovery arrived late one night in the lab, in the form of fresh electron microscope images. It was the culmination of years of dogged research and opens the door to effective therapies against Lyme disease, and potentially other serious afflictions as well.

Of the 100 or so membrane proteins recognized in B. burgdorferi, BBA57 is special. Its presence is linked to Lyme arthritis, a painful, untreatable and often lifelong affliction occurring in 20% of Lyme disease patients.

The discovery of the membrane hole may be a turning point, as it provides an ideal site to attack Lyme arthritis by designing a drug that can plug up the pore.

“This project aims to discover the first structure of the major protein responsible for Lyme arthritis, BB57, which forms a pore-like structure in the membrane,” Fromme says. “When we unravel the structural basis for Lyme arthritis, new drugs can be developed to fight the condition and prevent the lifelong suffering of hundreds of thousands of patients.”

Climate change and Lyme disease

The bacteria responsible for Lyme disease are carried in the saliva of several tick varieties. In the Northeast and upper Midwestern U.S., the disease is transmitted by the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis), and by the western blacklegged tick (Ixodes pacificus) along the Pacific Coast.

Lyme-carrying ticks operate by stealth. They are not able to fly or jump, instead finding their targets through a process known as questing. Resting atop grasses or shrubs, the ticks hold fast to leaves or grass using their lower legs. The upper pair of legs is kept outstretched, awaiting an unsuspecting passerby. When a suitable host brushes past the place where the tick lies in wait, it quickly climbs onto the host and locates a place to bite and feed on blood.

Ticks may attach themselves to any part of the human body but are often found in well-concealed regions, including the groin area, armpits and scalp. Once a tick has attached and begun feeding, it usually takes 36–48 hours for the Lyme bacteria to be transmitted.

While Borrelia bacteria can cause severe illness in their human hosts, in a diabolical twist, they may improve the tick’s fitness by modifying its central nervous system, extending the length of time the tick spends questing and making it more resistant to extremes of temperature and dryness. To make matters worse, many Lyme disease patients become co-infected with other pathogenic microbes lurking in ticks.

Another area of concern is the fact that reported cases of the disease have roughly doubled since 1991. This is likely due to a combination of factors, including more awareness of the disease and better diagnostic approaches. But there is also mounting evidence that the geographic range over which Lyme-carrying ticks wander may be expanding due to climate change.

Disease of a thousand faces

Many factors may affect the timing and nature of symptoms of Lyme disease, which typically begin three to 30 days following infection. Such symptoms may include fever, chills, headache, fatigue, muscle and joint aches, and swollen lymph nodes, with or without an accompanying rash.

One reason Lyme disease is so vexing to properly diagnose is that it can manifest in many ways in different patients. While 70% of Lyme cases develop the signature circular rash according to reporting, even this figure remains a topic of fierce controversy, and the CDC believes there may be a significant overreporting of rashes. This is because without the rash, Lyme cases are less likely to be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner by physicians.

Should the telltale rash known as erythema migrans occur, it will appear at the site of the tick bite, expanding gradually over several days. The rash may feel warm to the touch but is usually not painful or itchy. The rash sometimes clears as it enlarges, producing a characteristic bullseye appearance, but can assume different shapes, if it is present at all.

An array of further symptoms can develop days or months after infection, including facial palsy; neck stiffness; severe headache; intermittent pain in tendons, muscles, joints and bones; heart palpitations or an irregular heartbeat (known as Lyme carditis); nerve pain and inflammation of the brain and spinal cord; episodes of dizziness; and shortness of breath.

Behm recalls the perplexing constellation of symptoms at the start of her illness: “As a younger teenager, I had random medical issues that came up that just didn’t seem to make sense,” she says.

“There were visits to a lot of medical facilities. They knew something was wrong but couldn’t figure out what it was. I got passed around to specialists until I was officially diagnosed my senior year of high school.”

Lyme arthritis can cause severe pain and permanent joint damage

Approximately one in four Lyme disease patients may develop Lyme arthritis, involving chronic joint pain and swelling, particularly the knees and other large joints. The disorder occurs when the Lyme disease bacteria migrate to joint tissues, causing inflammation.

If left untreated, Lyme arthritis causes permanent damage to joints. While knees are the most commonly affected area, other large joints may be involved, including the shoulder, ankle, elbow, jaw, wrist or hip.

Following diagnosis, Lyme disease is treated with a course of antibiotics, which can work to eliminate the spirochete bacteria and gradually relieve symptoms. Yet, there is an important caveat: time is of the essence.

“The existing treatments generally don’t work if you’ve been infected more than two to six months prior,” Hansen says.

By this time, “the bacteria have disseminated in your body, and go into a persistent, antibiotic-resistant form. So if you’re diagnosed six years later, like Karie, and you’re treated for the disease, that treatment probably doesn’t work because the bacteria are resistant,” she says.

The result can be a collection of symptoms referred to [by some] as Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome. The causes are varied and remain poorly understood. It may be that the bacterium has changed form and sequestered itself in ways that evade detection. In other cases, autoimmune responses may be involved. To date, no treatment exists for these common complications.

Roughly 70,000 people in the U.S. each year experience lifelong, untreatable Lyme disease. Among these are some 42,000 who develop Lyme arthritis. Currently, physicians have had little to offer such patients, but that may be about to change.

Protein components of Lyme unmasked

Using electron microscopy, Behm, Hansen and Fromme were able to zero in on a protein that had been identified in previous research as an essential element in the process leading to Lyme arthritis. This work had been carried out by Dr. Uptal Pal, a Lyme disease authority from the University of Maryland, who is now collaborating with the ASU group.

The Lyme disease protein complex at the membrane surface of B. burgdorferi is comparatively large, tricky to crystallize and not easily amenable to X-ray crystallography, the conventional gold standard for protein structural analysis. Instead, a relatively new and powerful method known as cryo-EM, ideal for large proteins, was used.

Cryo-EM, a groundbreaking method for investigating 3D protein shapes, has racked up a long list of impressive achievements since 2017, when its discoverers were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Nevertheless, the new study marks the first time it has been applied to the study of Lyme disease.

The technique involves flash-freezing solutions of proteins or other biomolecules in vitreous ice, then bombarding them with electrons to produce images of individual molecules suitable for electron microscopy. The images are used to reconstruct the 3D structure of the molecule, an essential step in understanding how proteins work, how their dysfunction (or use by pathogens) can trigger disease and how drugs may be custom engineered to target them.

Molecular mugshot spurs eureka moment

Peering at the specimens through electron eyes, the researchers began to produce a molecular portrait of the suspect believed to be responsible for Lyme arthritis, through the acquisition of thousands of cryo-EM snapshots.

Research by Pal had already shown that strains of Borrelia engineered to lack BBA57 did not produce Lyme arthritis, though the reasons for this remained obscure. It was only through the work of Behm and her team that a plausible mechanism gradually came into focus.

In addition to complex sample preparation, thousands of images had to be carefully assembled. Often, it seemed the researchers were feeling their way through the dark. But late one evening in the lab, a new set of negative stain electron microscopy images were developed, and the results were riveting. At long last, the team had pictures with just enough resolution to make out what unmistakably appeared as a small hole in the membrane, composed of protein subunits.

It was the break they had been waiting for, after three years of work.

The team had theorized that perhaps Borrelia causes Lyme arthritis by transporting some disease factor from within the cell, out into the extracellular environment. And here, before their eyes, was the transport tunnel likely used as a passageway from inside the cell to outside, into the host’s bloodstream.

“Debbie, Petra and I were all there, having a late-night meeting when we saw the images. And everyone shouted, ‘Yay!’” Behm recalls.

The elusive pores they had long suspected had materialized with unmistakable clarity.

The race for a cure

The most gratifying news for the group was not simply that their hard work was rewarded with an important insight into the structure of BBA57, but that the finding suggests a promising approach for preventing Lyme arthritis.

The basic idea is simple: Design a drug that plugs up the hole on the Borrelia membrane surface. But to accomplish this, the protein structure of BBA57 will require much more refinement.

The team has calculated that the images of a million pores will be needed to visualize the protein with sufficient resolution to permit drug design. The researchers are using the new award from ASU Woman and Philanthropy to achieve this feat, collecting the mass of images that will permit structural determination down to the locations of atoms.

Achieving atomic resolution will allow the researchers to see where each of the roughly 800,000 atoms making up each pore-forming molecule are situated.

“We’ll know the position of each of those atoms, and that kind of intimate detail is enough to be able to computationally look for drug binders, with existing drug libraries,” Hansen says.

Teaming up with Pal, the researchers are pursuing long-term funding through a $3 million grant proposal to NIH, due to begin as early as 2023. The funding will be contingent on the early results the group is producing now, so the pace of study is hectic.

Once the final structural determination of a given protein has been made, drug companies can take the 3D data and use high-performance computers to begin designing drugs to act on it.

The long and winding road ahead

BBA57 is just one protein active in Lyme disease. Many others exist, and once they have been characterized, may also be targeted by smart drugs. The possibility of preventing Lyme disease altogether may be on the horizon, and the general approach pursued by Behm and her colleagues may be applicable to other tick-borne diseases or, possibly, other spirochete afflictions, such as syphilis, yaws and relapsing fever.

Having suffered through the ups and downs of this enigmatic illness, Behm is doubly committed to finding answers. She describes the early days of her pitched battle with the disease as a mixture of fear and determination.

Behm continues her explorations of Lyme disease at her new position as ORISE Fellow at the CDC in Atlanta.

__________________

**Comment**

I have numerous issues with this article:

  1. Lyme arthritis IS treatable.  Please see the comment section after the article:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2022/05/04/why-do-some-people-develop-severe-lyme-arthritis-others-dont/  I must also add that chelation (pulling heavy metals out of the body) is another strategy I am currently using. I have also found the following form of curcumin completely eradicated my pain. Dealing with inflammation is a must.
  2. Minimum transmission times have never been studied and to continue to regurgitate the mantra that it “usually takes 36-48” hours for it to happen is causing untold suffering.
  3. There is often more than Lyme at play and transmission time can be within minutes.
  4. “Climate change” has NOTHING to do with tick and disease proliferation but continues to be chanted like a mantra from research institutions who depend upon government grants.  It is part of a much larger scheme for power and money.
  5. Pigeon-holing symptoms happening three-30 days after infection is mythology also dooming thousands.  Nothing is said about psychological issues often experienced.
  6. It is a complete LIE that 70% develop the EM rash. It is highly variable & often not there.
  7. We need to drop the PTLDS label like a bad habit.  It does not explain a huge subset of patients but is still being used to put patients into a four-cornered box.
  8. To throw out that 70,000 in the US experience untreatable Lyme is complete guesswork.  According to this, the actual number is much, much higher.  No research is done on this group.  They simply don’t exist because mainstream medicine/research, led by the nose by the CDC/NIH/IDSA, don’t believe chronic/persistent Lyme exists.  Nobody even talks about the coinfections and the ramifications of having both.
  9. While researchers are riveted on finding/creating an expensive pharmaceutical “smart” drug (with patents to go all around making everyone wealthy) to plug up the elusive “pore” or conduit through which supposedly arthritis is created from, they ignore cheaper, safer, options such as nutraceuticals which desperate Lyme patients have had to discover, often on their own, to be effective.  Unfortunately, this myopic patent-oriented thinking is the “new norm” in research – even led by a patient who should know better due to the prolific and blatant corruption in all things in Lymeland.

Minerals and Their Effect On The Immune System

https://soundcloud.com/user-467428748/minerals-and-their-effect-on-immune-system?in=user-467428748/sets/the-candida-chronicles-podcast  Approx. 30 Min.

Podcast with Michael Biamonte, CCN and others

This lecture explores how minerals like selenium, zinc & copper work with your immune system to help regulate it. It also explains the interactions between candida, viruses, and other infections with these minerals.

For more:

How a False HCQ Narrative Was Created & New Study Shows HCQ Blocks COVID Virus Entry

http://

Sept. 19. 2022

Another safe, effective, cheap drug effective against COVID yet highly censored and maligned is ivermectin.  Mikki Willis, creator of the Plandemic series, recently created a 14 minute documentary on the effectiveness of ivermectin and the sordid backstory.
____________________
The ‘powers that be’ have chosen ineffective and toxic remdesivir to be given in hospitals, which have become the modern day killing fields.  Now, a group of attorneys are suing hospitals who capitulated due to the CARES Act which gives kick backs to hospitals for using the drug and ventilation (which also didn’t work but caused great harm), as well as mandating the experimental mRNA gene therapy injection for all their employees.

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/how-a-false-hydroxychloroquine-narrative

How a false hydroxychloroquine narrative was created, and much more

This is the most important article I ever wrote, because it cracks open the plandemic nut. Perhaps more appropriate, it lances the pandemic boil so all can see/smell the putridness inside.

I began writing on this subject on my blog in May 2020 and kept adding items. Because I only had 1,000 subscribers when I posted it to Substack in March, I am posting it again for the other 12,000 plus.

It is remarkable that a large series of events taking place over the past months produced a unified message about hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and produced similar policies about the drug in the US, Canada, Australia, NZ and western Europe.  The message is that generic, inexpensive hydroxychloroquine (costing only $1.00 to produce a full course) is dangerous and should not be used to treat a potentially fatal disease, Covid-19, for which there are no (other) reliable treatments.

Hydroxychloroquine has been used safely for 65 years in many millions of patients.  And so the message was crafted that the drug is safe for its other uses, but dangerous when used for Covid-19.  It doesn’t make sense, but it seems to have worked.

In the US, “Never Trump” morphed into “Never Hydroxychloroquine,” and the result for the pandemic is “Never Over.”  But while anti-Trump spin is what characterized suppression strategies in the US, the frauds perpetrated about hydroxychloroquine and the pandemic include most western countries.

Why do I say “Never Over”?  I am expanding on this claim with a), b), c) on August 30. Later in the paper additional evidence is provided.

a) Because if people were treated with HCQ at the onset of their illness, over 99% would quickly resolve the infection, avoiding progression to the late stage disease characterized by cytokine storm, thrombophilia and organ failure. Despite claims to the contrary, this treatment is very safe.  (Yet outpatient treatment is banned in many US states.) UPDATE Jan 15: The CDC forgot to rewrite its guidance on malaria and hydroxychloroquine during Covid.  CDC says hydroxychloroquine “can be safely taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers”  Only “when it is used at higher doses for many years, a rare eye condition called retinopathy has occurred.

b) If people were treated prophylactically with this drug (using only 2 tablets weekly) as is done in some areas and in some occupational groups in India, there would probably be at least 50% fewer cases after exposure. (Such treatment is currently banned in much of the US, including in my state of Maine.)

c) Protocols for in-hospital treatment (that were unknown during the initial peak of illness in the US and Europe) using HCQ and individually selected blood thinners, steroids, vitamins, zinc and other drugs such as used at NYU, have significantly reduced mortality of the very small number of people who might still progress to a serious illness. (The FDA, however, recommends against the use of HCQ outside of clinical trials, and the CDC and NIH recommend against it.)

If we followed a), b) and c) the result would be much briefer periods of infectiousness, lower viral loads, less severe illness and considerably less transmission.  The R zero (average number of people each case infects) would drop below one and the pandemic would soon die out.

Were acts to suppress the use of HCQ carefully orchestrated?  You decide.

Might these events have been planned to keep the pandemic going?  To sell expensive drugs and vaccines to a captive population?   Could these acts result in prolonged economic and social hardship, eventually transferring wealth from the middle class to the very rich?  Are these events evidence of a conspiracy?

Here is a list of what happened, in no special order. Please help add to this list if you know of other actions I should include.  This will be a living document, added to as new information becomes available.

I have penned this as if it is the “To Do” list of items to be accomplished by those who pull the strings.  The items on the list have already been carried out.  One wonders what else might be on their list, yet to be carried out, for this pandemic.  (See link for article)


**Comment**

Dr. Nass goes through the COVID debacle step by step on how the ‘powers that be’ suppressed cheap, effective, safe COVID treatments so the public appeared to have no choice but to submit to an experimental gene therapy never before used in humans.  It worked.  The indoctrination is complete and the division has never been greater.

She also goes through the fraudulent studies being used to this day to malign these treatments.  All the studies are fundamentally flawed and designed for a pre-determined outcome. She goes through crazy examples being used to paint treatments as dangerous (one guy used HCQ in the form of fish tank cleaner and subsequently died).  She demonstrates the complicity of medical journals who simply rode out controversy but never admitted fault, but further served to muddy the waters.  Then, journals didn’t tell the media that data were fabricated and the study fraudulent, which further propagated the lie.

She demonstrates how federal agencies like the FDA and CDC:
  • march in lockstep by making unsubstantiated and false claims (often based upon models), and restricting the use of these treatments to clinical trials which are virtually impossible to enroll in or use excessive doses
  • avoid funding clinical trails to test drug combinations like HCQ with zinc, azithromycin, or with both
  • create a NIH Guidelines committee for Covid treatment recommendations, in which 16 members have or had financial entanglements with Gilead, maker of Remdesivir, whom were appointed by the Co-Chairs.  Two of the three Co-Chairs are also financially entangled with Gilead.  The NIH treatment guidelines summary cherry picks the literature to claim HCQ provides no benefit.
  • frighten doctors so they don’t prescribe hydroxychloroquine, because prescribing outside the new NIH “standard of care” leaves them open to both malpractice lawsuits and potential loss of license.  This should ring a bell with Lyme/MSIDS patients as this has been done in Lymeland for over 40 years.
  • suddenly, and without precedent, require lab monitoring when using HCQ making it hard to use in outpatients.
  • use the WHO to pressure governments & professional societies to stop doctors from using HCQ
  • convince the public that COVID will be long-lasting
  • prevent COVID tests from other countries and fail to produce a valid test making it impossible to track anything
  • lie about COVID severity when it mattered
  • destroy the reputation of respected doctors who stood in their way
  • collude with social media to ban content that doesn’t agree with their accepted narrative
  • stop manufacturers from supplying the drug and turn them into surveillance/enforcement arms by having them collect information on all off-label use of hydroxychloroquine in New Zealand and Australia
  • attempt to retract published papers that provide evidence to support use of HCQ for COVID
  • have ‘bought’ scientists conceal their financial conflicts of interest in their HCQ clinical trials and publications as well as in the guidelines they produce
  • get their experimental, unlicensed drugs tested, much more expeditiously and cheaply than under ordinary circumstances, on Covid patients in large clinical trials
  • have a research organization with big Pharma members (A.O.K.I.) pressure the Russian Ministry of Health to remove HCQ from its treatment guidelines
  • stop the use of HCQ due to a fabricated study in countries with high COVID mortality
  • get state Pharmacy Boards to refuse to dispense HCQ outside of clinical trials
  • again collude with social media and mainstream media to ban and malign doctors giving a press conference about HCQ and then ban comments about the ban. Take down the doctor’s website as well.
  • have Dr. Fauci discredit published observational studies that show benefit using HCQ
  • censure and oust a state legislator because she credited HCQ for saving her life
  • cause articles favorable to HCQ to disappear.  Here is a brief description of the article:
    • Prodromos et al., Preprint, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.29781.65765 (meta analysis)  Hydroxychloroquine is Effective and Safe for the Treatment of COVID-19, and May be Universally Effective When Used Early Before Hospitalization: A Systematic Review  Meta analysis of 41 studies concluding: “HCQ has been shown to have consistent clinical efficacy for COVID-19 when it is used early in the outpatient setting, and in general would appear to work better the earlier it is used. Overall HCQ is effective against COVID-19. There is no credible evidence that HCQ results in worsening of COVID-19. HCQ has been shown to be safe for the treatment of COVID-19 when responsibly used.”
  • blame the pandemic on humans damaging nature and climate change: Cell, in the final paragraph, on September 3 by Fauci and Morens:

“The COVID-19 pandemic is yet another reminder, added to the rapidly growing archive of historical reminders, that in a human-dominated world, in which our human activities represent aggressive, damaging, and unbalanced interactions with nature, we will increasingly provoke new disease emergencesWe remain at risk for the foreseeable future. COVID-19 is among the most vivid wake-up calls in over a century. It should force us to begin to think in earnest and collectively about living in more thoughtful and creative harmony with nature, even as we plan for nature’s inevitable, and always unexpected, surprises.”

  • attempt to expunge official info that HCQ is safe but forget to remove malaria treatment guidance which still tells the truth but might disappear shortly:  CDC’s guidance states,

Who can take hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine can be prescribed to adults and children of all ages. It can also be safely taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers.

What are the potential side effects of hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine is a relatively well tolerated medicine. The most common adverse reactions reported are stomach pain, nausea, vomiting, and headache. These side effects can often be lessened by taking hydroxychloroquine with food. Hydroxychloroquine may also cause itching in some people. All medicines may have some side effects. Minor side effects such as nausea, occasional vomiting, or diarrhea usually do not require stopping the antimalarial drug. If you cannot tolerate your antimalarial drug, see your health care provider; other antimalarial drugs are available. 

How long is it safe to use hydroxychloroquine? CDC has no limits on the use of hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of malaria. When hydroxychloroquine is used at higher doses for many years, a rare eye condition called retinopathy has occurred. People who take hydroxychloroquine for more than five years should get regular eye exams.

Overdose of antimalarial drugs, particularly hydroxychloroquine, can be fatal

  • collude with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to smear HCQ by funding another paper (despite dozens of studies to the contrary) where HCQ actually did help, but the authors massaged the data to remove statistical significance… and shut the trial down prematurely.  Dr. Nass’s analysis is here.