Archive for the ‘research’ Category

‘Vaxxed’ Injured Pilots Speak, South African Doctor Tells All, and German Pathologists Show Microscopy of Scary Objects in Shots & Patient Blood

**UPDATE March, 2023**

This update contains a list of pilots and flight attendants who recently had cardiac arrests inflight, many of whom died suddenly.  Now, in a “cost cutting solution,” and due to staffing shortages, there is a push to only have ONE fully vaxxed pilot in the cockpit which would be devastating should it occur, due to the potential for these pilots to suffer events while flying with no one else to take over.

https://rumble.com/vs048b-jab-injured-pilot-speaks-out-pilot-blacks-out-mid-air-bioweapon-shot-tearin.html  Video Here  (Approx. 17 Min)

COVID Shot Injured Pilot Speaks on Stew Peter’s Show

Cody Flint is 34 years old. Until recently he worked as an agricultural pilot. He has fifteen years of flying experience. Like so many other people, Cody received the Pfizer shot last year. He waited 48 hours, then went up for a flight, but everything was wrong. He got a severe headache, “like a bomb went off inside his head.” He got tunnel vision, couldn’t properly move his arms and legs, and he even blacked out. It’s a miracle he managed to successfully land his plane, and Cody isn’t sure how he did it because he doesn’t remember actually landing. Cody Flint joins us to discuss.

Now, ponder for a moment all the other pilots flying commercial airplanes which could be putting the public at great risk due to an injection that isn’t safe or effective, and isn’t even needed due to safe, effective treatments for COVID.

__________________

https://rumble.com/vrwsu9-pilot-speaks-out.html  Video Here (Approx 2 Min)

Another Pilot Speaks Out

Pilot Greg Pearson experienced heart issues after the COVID jab.  He was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation which can lead to blood clots in the heart and is a major cause of strokes. He states other pilots are too afraid to speak up even though they too are experiencing adverse reactions.

_________________

https://rumble.com/vrg01s-46096192.html  Video Here (Approx 22 Min)

Mother of Teen Working to Become Pilot Speaks Out

Canadian MPP Randy Hillier Exposes Adverse Reactions In Canada: 16 year old, actively working to become a pilot has been forced to put his dreams on hold because of the results of the pressure he faced to receive the shot.

  • pins and needles after shot
  • light headed, feel like he was going to pass out
  • chest pain
  • couldn’t breathe
  • heart rate was 137 bpm when his normal rate was 78 bpm
  • ultrasound showed water around his heart (pericarditis). Doctor states it is a “known side effect” of the Pfizer shot

For more:

___________________

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IQoUmvcoiStX/  Video Here (Approx. 11 Min)

“The Bigger Plan”

Dr. Chetty calls it “covid illness,” because a virus has not been completely isolated; however, the pathogen causing sickness and death IS the spike protein, and spike protein is what the “vaccine” is meant to make in your body.  He states this protein is one of the most contrived toxins or poisons that man has ever made, and that the aim of this toxin is to kill billions without anyone noticing. So the toxin or poison has been put into a virus (vector) to expose the entire population.

“This plan is to make sure that we can control and kill off a large proportion of our population without anyone suspecting that we were poisoned and so I think the justification for everything we see is warranted in understanding the endgame.” ~ Dr. Shankara Chetty

South African doctor, Dr. Shankara Chetty is a general practitioner with a natural science background in genetics, advanced biology,microbiology and biochemistry. From the start of the Covid pandemic, he has been critically watching the information arising from observations around the world.  He clearly explains what the COVID injections do and don’t do.  The spike protein is the toxin.

___________________

https://www.bitchute.com/video/LPBdTIqVXocL/  Video Here (Approx. 11 Min)

More Microscopy on COVID Vials Showing Sharp Objects, Worms With Eggs, & Perhaps a Microchip

German Pathologists and doctors present an analysis of the coronavirus “vaccine” during a shocking press conference in September, 2021. A clip of the conference reveals they also found numerous foreign objects in the injection, as well as in ‘vaxxed’ blood.

The live-streamed press conference was organized by the Stiftung Corona-Ausschuss, which can be loosely described as Germany’s equivalent of America’s Frontline Doctors. As expected, their remarkable presentation was slammed by the German legacy media.

The event was spearheaded by:

  • Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, who served as “head of the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years and then worked as a pathologist in private practice”
  • Prof. Dr. Walter Lang, who “worked as a pathologist at the Hannover Medical School from 1968 to 1985” before founding a private institute for pathology in Hanover 
  • Prof. Dr. Werner Birkholz, a former professor of electrical engineering with a focus on quality and risk management at Jacobs University in Bremen.
  • Introductions and the presentation was made by Dr. Ute Langer, a physician, and a surgeon.

SUMMARY:

  • Some of the foreign objects were described as “accurately constructed.”
  • Worms/parasites with visible eggs, which would normally drop their tail – had intact tails and were clearly seen – even their digestive tract. 
  • The type of worms seen cause cancer and severe pain as in rheumatoid diseases, joint pain, or even Alzheimer’s if they are found in the brain.
  • There appears to be an object that could be a microchip.  There are transparent objects with very sharp edges that shine like glass.
  • In May of 2021, Ulm University stated on South West TV News that after examining 4 batches of AstraZeneca COVID vials, up to two-thirds of the contents had substances that don’t belong there and only one-third was actually “vaccine” material.  Nobody has a clue what these foreign substances do inside the human body.
  • Authorities simply do not care and the manufacturing company didn’t even bother to respond. 
  • In December, the German doctors held a second powerful press conference headlined “Are Deaths and Adverse Health Effects After Vaccination Against Covid-19 Related in a Pathologically Detectable Way?”.

Please see this article on the subject, complete with pictures of the foreign objects as well as a transcript.  Also, go here for over 1,000 studies showing the COVID injections are dangerous.

For more:

Independent experts from across the globe are finding the exact same things.

 

Category:

research, vaccines, Viruses

Houston, We Have a Problem: Doctors Can’t Identify Ticks

https://danielcameronmd.com/clinicians-difficulty-identifying-ticks/

Clinicians have difficulty identifying ticks

identifying-ticks

Welcome to another Inside Lyme Podcast with your host Dr. Daniel Cameron. In this episode, Dr. Cameron discusses findings from a recent study which examined the proficiency of clinicians at identifying ticks in the northeastern region of the United States.

By

The study by Laga and colleagues entitled “Proficiency at Tick Identification by Pathologists and Clinicians Is Poor” was published in The American Journal of Dermatopathology.¹

Using high-resolution photographs of ticks, the authors surveyed 115 health care providers, which included primarily medical students, medical residents, and physicians.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH A VIDEO DISCUSSING TICK IDENTIFICATION WITH DR. CAMERON

The survey was simple. Each health care provider was asked to look at high-resolution color pictures of ticks provided by the University of Rhode Island Tick Encounter Resource Center.  (The dimensions of each image were 1 5/8 inches by 2 inches.)

The participants were asked to select one of 5 possible answers for each photograph:

  1. American dog tick
  2. Deer/ blacklegged tick
  3. Lone Star tick
  4. Brown dog tick
  5. “I do not know”

Only 1 in 3 ticks were correctly identified.

The survey participants correctly identified 60% of the non-engorged black-legged ticks but only 34% correctly identified a partially engorged black-legged tick.

“Likely explanations are that texts and media rarely show partially engorged ticks,” the authors explain.

Additionally, “the color contrast seen between the scutum and abdomen in the blacklegged tick, for example, is lost after 2.5–3 days of engorgement.”

Participants had more difficulty identifying the other tick species:

  • 1 in 2 participants identified a non-engorged Lone Star tick;
  • 1 in 3 identified a non-engorged American dog tick;
  • 1 in 4 identified a non-engorged adult Brown dog tick.

The number of ticks correctly identified was worse for partially engorged ticks.

Medical students and non-physician health care providers (i.e., nurses, physician assistants) fared the worse with only about 1 in 4 correctly identifying the ticks.

In everyday practice, health care providers do not view high-resolution photographs of ticks. Their experience, instead, is with actual ticks which appear much smaller.

“In addition to choosing the easier-to-identify female ticks for our test, we also chose adult rather than nymphal ticks for the quiz,” the authors explain.

“Nymphal ticks, in addition to be being smaller, tend to have more muted colors and less distinctive markings on their scutums.”

In actual practice, it’s important that health care providers can identify engorged ticks. Yet, the survey shows that engorged ticks were more difficult for providers to identify.

The following questions are addressed in this podcast episode:

  1. How often is the tick seen?
  2. Have you found it difficult to identify a tick?
  3. What are a few tips to identifying ticks?
  4. What diseases does each tick carry?
  5. Why is it important to be able to identify an engorged tick?
  6. What is the risk of an engorged tick?
  7. What educational information should clinicians receive?
  8. What do Lyme disease patients know?
  9. What are treatment options for a tick bite?
  10. What are the risks and benefits of a single 200 mg dose of doxycycline for a tick bite?
  11. How effective is testing of ticks for diseases?

Please remember that the advice given is general and not intended as specific advice as to any particular patient. If you require specific advice, then please seek that advice from an experienced professional.

Inside Lyme Podcast Series

This Inside Lyme case series will be discussed on my Facebook and made available on podcast and YouTube.  As always, it is your likes, comments, and shares that help spread the word about this series and our work. If you can, please leave a review on iTunes or wherever else you get your podcasts.

References:
  1. Laga AC, Granter SR, Mather TN. Proficiency at Tick Identification by Pathologists and Clinicians Is Poor. Am J Dermatopathol. May 11 2021.

____________________

**Comment**

As they say, “There’s no such thing as a good tick.”

That said, doctors are woefully educated on ticks, the diseases they spread, how to diagnose, treat, and recognize not just various ticks but the wide variety of symptoms patients struggle with.

This study partially reveals the many problems in Lyme-land.

Yesterday, I posted an article proposing guidelines by supposed ‘experts’ that call themselves the ‘Wilderness Medical Society.’  In the comment section I break down the various continually regurgitated myths used as talking points and the basis for all research and clinical guidelines. One of the things discussed is how the “wait and see” approach has been dooming patients for decades. This essentially means that rather than quickly treating known tick bites prophylactically, they simply wait and see if the person develops symptoms.

They also continue to push the one-dose doxy prophylactic treatment which doesn’t work. Neither does two pills. Unfortunately, researchers still believe the EM rash is some magical symbol.  The EM rash comes and goes at will and should never be a marker for effectiveness of treatment.

The catch with all of this is doctors can’t identify the ticks involved.

Ironically, if the doctor can’t identify the tick, or if attachment time is unknown, they still recommend the “wait and see” approach, even though that particular refrain has caused untold damage.

Category:

Activism, research, Ticks

Experts Weigh In After Suing FDA for Access to Pfizer Data

**UPDATE May, 2022**

Please see this article which includes the update at the beginning on how frequently adverse events were reported as “unrelated” to the ‘vaccine.’

Recently, a judge ruled in favor of a group of experts who sued the FDA over lack of access to Pfizer COVID injection data.  Instead of the FDA’s request of 75 years to slow drip the data, the judge ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month – which would take approximately 8 months for completion. Unfortunately, the FDA will redact information that it decides is not for public consumption, which might make the data meaningless. For instance, if the FDA redacts batch numbers it will be difficult to identify which participants were harmed by which batches. If they redact ID numbers, it will be difficult to track adverse events.

https://maryannedemasi.com/publications/f/experts-weigh-in-after-suing-fda-for-access-to-pfizer-trial-data

Experts weigh in after suing FDA for access to Pfizer trial data

20 December 2021|COVID-19
COVID-19, mRNA, vaccine, Pfizer, transparency, trial data, FDA, DOJ, Aaron Siri, Aaron Kheriaty, Tom Jefferson

By Maryanne Demasi, PhD

In Dec 2020, the US drug regulator (FDA) granted emergency use authorisation to Pfizer’s Covid-19 mRNA vaccine with limited data from phase III trials.

Amid the urgency of the pandemic, the review of the trial data was conducted faster than usual. What would normally take an average of 10 months to review, only took the FDA 108 days.

Immediately, it raised doubts about the speed with which the agency made its decision.

Fast forward to Aug 2021 and the FDA granted full approval to Pfizer’s (Comirnaty) mRNA vaccine, without releasing the full data set to the public for independent scrutiny. 

Experts became concerned that all the publicly available information on a fully licensed product, was limited to journal articles, press releases, and assessments by drug regulators – all of which are subject to conflicts of interest and bias.  (See link for article)

________________

Highlights:

  • 80 public health officers and researchers formed an alliance to get the data.
  • The group filed a FOIA lawsuit in September due to lack of public disclosure of FDA data.
  • The placebo & therefore the control group was eliminated because the shot was offered to all.
  • The group argues that due to insufficient and hurried testing & a culture of secrecy, the idea of informed consent is arguable.
  • There has been under-reporting adverse events, falsification of data, and a lack of efficacy  regarding the Pfizer injections.
  • DOJ lawyers wanted to drip feed Pfizer data over decades (75 years in fact, which is laughable).
  • The FDA claims it is insufficiently staffed.  They have 18,000 employees and $6.5 billion in funding.

Important quote:

“It is dystopian for the government to give Pfizer billions, mandate Americans to take its product, prohibit Americans from suing for harm, but yet refuse to let Americans see the data underlying its licensure.” ~ Aaron Siri, US attorney acting on behalf of PHMPT

  • The first round of Pfizer’s documents has already been released by the FDA.
  • It showed 1,223 people died from the shot within the first 90 days of the rollout, but much of the document is redacted and it is unknown how many doses had been shipped out, i.e. how many total doses were given.
  • Please see top link for a telling graph of 10 months of the COVID shots vs 20 years of flu vaccines.  Shocking would be an understatement.
  • https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf  Starting on page 30, there are nearly 9 pages of single spaced adverse reactions.

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines

Wilderness Medical Society Writes Clinical Practice Guidelines for TBI’s. They Also Are Wrong

https://www.wemjournal.org/article/S1080-6032(21)00163-0/fulltext

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Tick-Borne Illness in the United States

Published:October 09, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2021.09.001
The Wilderness Medical Society convened an expert panel to develop evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and management of tick-borne illness (TBI). Recommendations are graded based on quality of supporting evidence according to criteria put forth by the American College of Chest Physicians. The guidelines include a brief review of the clinical presentation, epidemiology, prevention, and management of TBI in the United States, with a primary focus on interventions that are appropriate for resource-limited settings.
Strong recommendations are provided for the use of DEET, picaridin, and permethrin; tick checks; washing and drying clothing at high temperatures; mechanical tick removal within 36 h of attachment; single-dose doxycycline for high-risk Lyme disease exposures versus “watchful waiting;” evacuation from backcountry settings for symptomatic tick exposures; and TBI education programs. Weak recommendations are provided for the use of light-colored clothing; insect repellents other than DEET, picaridin, and permethrin; and showering after exposure to tick habitat. Weak recommendations are also provided against passive methods of tick removal, including the use of systemic and local treatments. There was insufficient evidence to support the use of long-sleeved clothing and the avoidance of tick habitat such as long grasses and leaf litter. Although there was sound evidence supporting Lyme disease vaccination, a grade was not offered as the vaccine is not currently available for use in the United States.  (See Link for article)
_____________________
**Comment**
Any document that refuses to include ILADS material is rigged.  In the conclusion the authors admit:
The recommendations presented in this CPG are largely consistent with those presented by the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/index.html)
In essence they are telling us they’ve used tax-payer dollars to tell us nothing new.
  • These guidelines are a regurgitation of the accepted narrative by a supposed “expert panel” whom were chosen based on interest or research experience.
  • They essentially sifted through The Cabal’s research with keywords, and then looked at existing guidelines and CDC references – all of which are stacked against patients, but of course were peer-reviewed.
  • They didn’t even address the polarity which exists in both Lyme/MSIDS research and clinical practice.
  • The first glaring misnomer & simplification is that they state the black-legged tick is only in the Eastern US, despite independent research showing migrating birds are spreading ticks globally and that patients are infected globally.
  • While there is a greater risk of being bitten at certain times of the year, you can be bitten 24/7/365.  Never forget that and never let your guard down.
  • They continue to downplay transmission if you remove the tick before 72 hours.  Don’t buy it.  I know too many who have defied this 4-cornered box, including myself.  Remove all ticks ASAP.
  • They continue to push the one-dose doxy prophylactic treatment which doesn’t work. Neither does two pills. Unfortunately, researchers still believe the EM rash is some magical symbol.  The EM rash comes and goes at will and should never be a marker for effectiveness of treatment.
  • The EM rash is a poor indicator of Lyme, and highly variable, although if you have it, you ARE INFECTED WITH LYME, no testing needed – start treatment ASAP.
  • Ironically, if the doctor can’t identify the tick, or if attachment time is unknown, they still recommend the “wait and see” approach, even though that particular refrain has caused untold damage.
  • The “experts” then give a complicated diagram showing a triage of events (many of which are faulty) leading to either remaining in the field or evacuating.  In other words, they are asking you to again trust the “experts” and their four-cornered box which has been defied again and again.
  • And lastly, and certainly expected is their belief in a Lyme vaccine as an “attractive option,” despite the fact patients have literally been maimed by it.

Category:

Lyme, Prevention, research, Treatment

Danish Researchers Discover New Hiding Place for Antibiotic Resistance

https://science.ku.dk/english/press/news/2021/danish-researchers-discover-new-hiding-place-for-antibiotic-resistance/

16 December 2021

Danish researchers discover new hiding place for antibiotic resistance

BacteriaGenes that make bacteria resistant to antibiotics can persist longer than it was previously believed. This was recently shown in a new University of Copenhagen study that reports a previously unknown hiding place for these genes. The finding represents a new and important piece in the puzzle to understand how bacterial antibiotic resistance works.
Getty Images
Photo: Getty Images

Antibiotic resistance is a race between us humans, who strive to find new antibiotics that can treat infectious diseases – and bacteria, which are becoming increasingly resistant. For now, bacteria are way ahead, which is why it is important for us to learn more about antibiotic resistance. A Danish research group has discovered a new piece of the puzzle that helps us better understand the ‘enemy’.

University of Copenhagen researchers have shown that the prevailing assumption that resistant bacteria lose their resistance capability when antibiotics are not present is a truth requiring significant modifications.

“One widespread strategy to combat antibiotic resistance has been to use antibiotics for a period of time and then take a break. The belief is that resistant bacteria will lose their resistance genes or be outcompeted during the break, after which the antibiotics will work again. But that approach doesn’t seem to hold up,” says one of the study’s senior authors, Associate Professor Mette Burmølle of the Department of Biology. Co-first author Henriette Lyng Røder elaborates:

“Our study demonstrates that resistance genes are able to hide in inactive bacteria, where they form a hidden reserve of resistance that bacteria can rely on. In other words, they don’t just disappear when antibiotics aren’t around.”  (See link for article)

_________________

Summary:

  • The study, found in NPJ Biofilms and Microbiome, is called: “Biofilms Can Act as Plasmid Reserves in the Absence of Plasmid Specific Selection”
  • The article of course delves into biofilms, something every Lyme/MSIDS patient must quickly learn about.
  • It has long been thought that using antibiotics and then taking a break would eradicate any lingering bacteria either through losing resistance genes or being out-competed.
  • The study found that resistance genes hide in inactive bacteria and form a hidden reserve.
  • Inactive bacteria found in biofilm have this hidden reserve of resistance genes that can be drawn upon. (Think of it as a special army that can be called upon when other soldiers are killed or injured)
  • Plasmids, which allow resistance genes to occur, also steal energy from bacteria and cause it to grow more slowly, so the bacteria strike the perfect balance by having active bacteria do the heavy lifting while inactive (hibernating) bacteria in biofilm have the life-sucking plasmids slowing them down but make them antibiotic resistant which is imperative for survival.
  • Researchers believe that resistance/persister reserves in biofilms are primarily built up in environmental bacteria found in soil, air, and wastewater.
  • Different species of bacteria can transmit resistance to each other, which means environmental bacteria found in soil for instance can be transmitted to the types of bacteria (say staph, for instance) that make people ill.
  • A concern is that antibiotic-resistant genes from humans and animals that ends up in sewage for instance may spread into the environment and turn environmental bacteria pathogenic or disease causing.

Important quote:

“In the bigger picture, this means that if there are a lot of inactive bacteria in the environment, in soil for example, then resistant genes don’t just gradually disappear when antibiotics aren’t present. Therefore, we ought to consider abandoning the idea that we can get rid of resistance genes and instead assume that they are always present. Understanding these dynamics can better equip us to battle antibiotic-resistant bacteria.”

Could someone please send this to the IDSA?

When I first read this, I completely missed the “new hiding place,” as this has been discussed for years by Lyme/MSIDS researchers and doctors.

  • Dr. Zhang calls them “persisters.”
  • Dr. Horowitz has had great success in a subset of patients using mycobacterium drugs and states: “the efficacy of dapsone combined with other antibiotics and agents that disrupt biofilms for the treatment of chronic Lyme disease/post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS)” [2] “decreased eight major Lyme symptoms severity and improved treatment outcomes among patients with chronic Lyme disease/PTLDS and associated co-infections.”
  • A study by Stanford Medicine suggests that the antibiotic azlocillin “completely kills off the disease-causing bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi at the onset of the illness.” In addition, the authors say, azlocillin “could be effective for treating [Lyme disease] patients infected with drug-tolerant bacteria that may cause lingering symptoms.” [5]
  • Researchers from Johns Hopkins School of Public Health found that a combination of antibiotics – daptomycin, doxycycline, and ceftriaxone − eradicated the slow-growing variant form (persisters) of the Lyme bacteria in a mouse model. Scientists believe persisters may be responsible for the chronic symptoms that some Lyme disease patients experience.  “There is a lot of excitement in the field because we now have not only a plausible explanation but also a potential solution for patients who suffer from persistent Lyme disease symptoms despite standard single-antibiotic treatment,” says Ying Zhang, MD, Ph.D., senior author on the study.
  • Dr. Mass has written that Disulfiram/Antabuse not only kills the active bacteria responsible for the disease but also a subpopulation of “persister-cells”.
  • This study shows how important it is to continue to play in the dirt and eat things from the ground.  Soil-based probiotics are bacteria naturally found in the earth. One of the most common types of soil-based probiotics (bacillus) has been used to ferment foods for hundreds of years.
  • Make sure you work with a reputable practitioner to become educated on the nuances of nutrition, probiotics, supplements, and other things that will help you
  • COVID has ignited a germ-fear panic which is unfounded and truly contrary to everything known about human health and germs/viruses.  The constant de-germing of every surface is killing beneficial bacteria and setting us up for illness. As with all things in life – it’s about balance.  When there’s too many bad-guys, your health will tip into illness, but when all is in balance, health is robust and stable.  Our job?  Try to find that proper balance, which is a lifetime work!  And, as with all things, looks slightly different on each individual, which is why allopathic medicine will never have the answers as it is a “one-sized fits all” approach where supposedly a singular pill will fix you and everyone else in exactly the same way.  Hopefully we can put that myth to rest once and for all, as this over simplification of health is leaving thousands in the dust – particularly Lyme/MSIDS patients.

Category:

research, Treatment