Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

FLCCC Webinar Tonight at 7 PM ET: Court Cases Compelling Hospitals to Give Ivermectin, 63 Studies Now Show it’s Efficacy in All Stages of COVID

https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_2CY5VGh7Rk6NeDPZOpzKyQ  Register Here

Don’t miss our FLCCC Weekly Webinar, tonight September 8th at 7 PM ET. We have an amazing line-up of guests from the front-lines of national news.

Newsworthy Topics:

  • Guests who have been involved in recent court cases to compel hospitals to give their loved ones Ivermectin.
  • Hospitals have refused to prescribe ivermectin to their critically ill patients.
  • 63 studies have now shown Ivermectin’s efficacy in all stages of COVID-19 disease.

Featured Guests:

  • FLCCC co-founding physician Dr. Fred Wagshul, who prescribed ivermectin to a patient in a Cincinnati hospital.
  • New York attorney Ralph Lorigo, who has represented more than a dozen families in these court cases.
  • Relatives and patients who survived after winning their court orders.

Videos of patients’ stories:

Recent Ruling:

On Monday, September 6, 2021, the Cincinnati judge, Michael A. Oster, Jr., ruled that West Chester hospital would be allowed to discontinue giving ivermectin to their patient, Jeffrey Smith, after the initial ruling compelled the hospital to give Mr. Smith the drug for 14 days.

  • “But for me, the most disturbing issue is that the hospital itself—after telling Julie Smith, Jeffrey’s wife, that they had tried everything to recover her husband and could do nothing more for him—refused to try ivermectin,” said Dr. Wagshul.

Register for Live Webinar

For more information on the FLCCC, the science and our protocols, please visit www.flccc.net

Molecular Biologist, mRNA Vaccine Mandates Based on ‘Faulty Assumption’ “Are We Going To Continue With Discrimination & Segregation in the United States of America?”

https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/09/07/molecular-biologist-mrna-vaccine-mandates-based-on-_1820_faulty-assumption

Molecular Biologist: mRNA Vaccine Mandates Based on ‘Faulty Assumption’

If Youtube censors this incredibly important video, go here:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/n0Zb7OrPK6co/

Calling mRNA “vaccines” gene therapies that the media have oversimplified based on a “faulty assumption,” Michigan molecular biologist Christina Parks gave a chilling testimony at a hearing on Michigan HB 4471, which would prohibit employers from discriminating against an individual who has not received the shot.

Saying mandates “basically take away our freedom of choice,” Parks said the faulty assumption is that vaccines prevent transmission when in actuality they don’t. “Does the vaccine for DTaP prevent transmission?” she asks. “No. Does the vaccine for flu prevent transmission? No.

“Do the vaccines for COVID prevent transmission? No. In fact they were never designed to do that.” As far as the “95% effective” goes, that isn’t even a reality, she said, because the Delta variant is predominant now — and “these vaccines have no ability to prevent infection by and transmission of the Delta variant.”  She doesn’t mention the fact when absolute risk is taken into account these injections are less than 1% effective.  She also doesn’t mention that without looking at infection rates, efficacy numbers convey nothing useful.  Statistical ‘slight of hand’ shenanigans are misleading the public. Further, these injections have caused more adverse reactions and death than all the vaccines reported to VAERS in the past 30 years.

Asking the legislature to base their decisions on real data, Parks pointed out that, as someone with a Ph.D., she is among those who are most vaccine hesitant for the COVID vaccines. And, aside from understanding the science of what the vaccines can and cannot do, she is also keenly aware of why people — especially Blacks — with less than a college education are also hesitant to trust the government’s vaccine recommendations.

The question, she said, is “who are we going to exclude from the workforce? Are we going to continue with discrimination and segregation in the United States of America?”

SOURCE: YouTube August 24, 2021

___________________

For a powerful short video on why blacks are “vaccine” hesitant:  https://twitter.com/WayneDupreeCom/status/1446222569628184580

For an excellent expose on the “vaccine” mandates, watch a 9 min report by investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson on Full Measure.

https://rumble.com/vs33yz-tricia-lindsay.html  Video Here if Youtube censors it below (Approx. 11 min) 

http://

10 Minutes of Powerful Truth: “Vaccine” Mandates are Illegal

Tricia Lindsay gives a very powerful speech to the public about how the US government and governments around the world are violating human rights by imposing mandates and discriminate against the unvaccinated.

“This is medical rape.” Tricia Lindsay, Civil Rights Attorney

For more:

There’s been a lot of cover-up, fraud, and collusion in the public health arena.  A group of inter-agency scientists formed a group called SPIDER that has delineated the corruption.  These groups are known to manipulate data for their own nefarious purposes.  I am elated that someone from the black community is educating others on these true racial travesties which have been covered up by our corrupt public health ‘authorities,’ because it concerns the ‘golden calf’ of vaccines – therefore it’s simply swept under the rug because, “it’s for the greater good.”

Mosquito Resistant Clothing Prevents Bites in Trials

https://news.ncsu.edu/2021/07/mosquito-resistant-clothing-prevents-bites-in-trials/

Mosquito-Resistant Clothing Prevents Bites in Trials

Bite-resistant textiles
Mosquitoes landing on bite-resistant fabric during an in vivo bioassay in which they fail to probe through the fabric due to its small pore size. The proboscis bends when mosquitoes try to push through the fabric. Credit: Matt Bertone.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
R. Michael Roe
Grayson Cave
Laura Oleniacz, NC State News Services

North Carolina State University researchers have created insecticide-free, mosquito-resistant clothing using textile materials they confirmed to be bite-proof in experiments with live mosquitoes. They developed the materials using a computational model of their own design, which describes the biting behavior of Aedes aegypti, the mosquito that carries viruses that cause human diseases like Zika, Dengue fever and yellow fever.

Ultimately, the researchers reported in the journal Insects that they were able to prevent 100 percent of bites when a volunteer wore their clothing – a base layer undergarment and a combat shirt initially designed for the military – in a cage with 200 live, disease-free mosquitoes. Vector Textiles, an NC State startup company, has licensed the related patent rights and intends to make clothing for commercial sale in the United States.

The researchers think their computational model could be used more widely to develop clothing to reduce transmission of diseases.

“The fabric is proven to work – that’s the great thing we discovered,” said study co-author Andre West, associate professor of fashion and textile design at NC State and director of Zeis Textiles Extension for Economic Development. “To me, that’s revolutionary. We found we can prevent the mosquito from pushing through the fabric, while others were thick enough to prevent it from reaching the skin.”

To develop the computational model to design textile materials that could prevent A. aegypti bites, researchers investigated the dimensions of the head, antenna and mouth of A. aegypti, and the mechanics of how it bites. Then, they used the model to predict textile materials that would prevent bites, depending on their thickness and pore size. Researchers said they believe the materials could be effective against other mosquito species in addition to A. aegypti because of similarities in biology and biting behavior.

“There are different uses for clothing,” said the study’s first author Kun Luan, postdoctoral research scholar of forest biomaterials at NC State. “The idea is to have a model that will cover all possible garments that a person would ever want.”

To test the accuracy of their model, the researchers tested the materials predicted to be bite-proof. In experiments with live, disease-free mosquitoes, the researchers surrounded a blood reservoir with plastic materials made according to parameters predicted by the model. They then counted how many mosquitoes became engorged with blood.

One material they initially tested was very thin – less than one millimeter thick – but had a very small pore size to prevent the mosquito from sticking its mouth parts, or proboscis, through the material. Another material had a medium pore size to prevent the mosquito from inserting its head through the textile far enough to reach the skin; and a third material had larger pores, but was sufficiently thick that the mosquito’s mouth still couldn’t reach the skin.

In a subsequent test, the researchers chose a series of knitted and woven fabrics that met the bite-proof parameters determined by the model, and validated they worked in experiments using both the blood reservoir and human volunteers. The researchers tested the number of bites received by volunteers when study participants inserted an arm covered by a protective sleeve into a mosquito cage. The researchers also compared the fabrics’ ability to prevent bites and repel mosquitoes to fabrics treated with an insecticide.

From what they learned in early experiments, researchers developed the bite-resistant, form-fitting undergarment made with a thin material, as well as a long-sleeved shirt, which was initially envisioned as a combat shirt for the military.

When a volunteer wore the garments sitting for 10 minutes and standing for 10 minutes in a walk-in cage with 200 hungry mosquitos, the volunteer found the combat shirt was 100 percent effective at preventing bites. In the first trial testing the base layer, the volunteer received bites on the back and shoulders – seven bites for 200 mosquitoes. The researchers attributed the bites to the fabric stretching and deforming, so they doubled the material layer around the shoulders, and were ultimately able to prevent 100 percent of bites. They also tested the clothing for comfort, and to see how well it trapped heat and released moisture.

“The final garments that were produced were 100 percent bite-resistant,” said Michael Roe, William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor of Entomology at NC State. “Everyday clothing you wear in the summer is not bite-resistant to mosquitoes. Our work has shown that it doesn’t have to be that way. Clothes that you wear every day can be made bite-resistant. Ultimately, the idea is to have a model that will cover all possible garments that person would ever want – both for the military as well as for private use.”

The study, “Mosquito-textile physics: A mathematical roadmap to insecticide-free, bite-proof clothing for everyday life,” was published online July 13, 2021, in the journal Insects. It was authored by Luan, Roe, West, Charles Apperson, Marian McCord, Emiel DenHartog, Quan Shi, Nicholas Travanty, Robert Mitchell, Grayson Cave, John Strider and Youngxin Wang from NC State University and Isa Bettermann, Florian Neumann and Tobias Beck from Aachen University, Germany. The study was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Defense Deployed War Fighter Program, Natick Contracting Division of the U.S. Department of Defense, the Chancellor’s Innovation Fund at NC State, the Southeast Center for Agricultural Health and Injury Prevention, PILOTS and the NC Agriculture Research Experiment Station.

-oleniacz-

Note to editors: The abstract follows.

“Mosquito-textile physics: A mathematical roadmap to insecticide-free, bite-proof clothing for everyday life”

Authors: Kun Luan, Andre J. West, Marian G. McCord, Emiel DenHartog, Quan Shi, Isa Bettermann, Jiayin Li, Nicholas V. Travanty, Robert D. Mitchell III, Grayson L. Cave, John B. Strider, Yongxin Wang, Florian Neumann, Tobias Beck, Charles S. Apperson and R. Michael Roe.

Published online in Insects on July 13, 2021.

DOI: 10.3390/insects12070636

Abstract: Garments treated with chemical insecticides are commonly used to prevent mosquito bites. Resistance to insecticides, however, is threatening the efficacy of this technology, and people are increasingly concerned about the potential health impacts of wearing insecticide-treated clothing. Here, we report a mathematical model for fabric barriers that resist bites from

Aedes aegypti mosquitoes based on textile physical structure and no insecticides. The model was derived from mosquito morphometrics and analysis of mosquito biting behavior. Precision polypropylene plates were first used to simulate woven and knitted fabrics for model validation.

Then based on model predictions, prototype knitted textiles and garments were developed that prevented mosquito biting and were tested for comfort. Our predictive model can be used to develop additional textiles in the future for garments that are highly bite-resistant to mosquitoes.

_____________________

For more:

The Story of Ivermectin & COVID-19 “Must See” Video

**UPDATE Feb. 21, 2022**

It’s gotten so bad, state attorney generals have had to call out the FDA, CDC, Fauci, and the media for ‘fueling confusion and misinformation’ by interfering with the treatment of COVID patients.  Both Nebraska and Oklahoma doctors are now free to prescribe off-label medications such as ivermectin and HCQ for COVID without fear of disciplinary action from corrupt groups like the AMA and state medical boards.

This legal action needs to happen in each and every state in the U.S.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cv86JlBir91g/  Video Here Approx. 25 Min.

The Story of Ivermectin & COVID-19

The story of the powerful players colluding together to suppress any knowledge of a drug that could end the pandemic

This “must see” video not only goes through Ivermectin research but reveals the players censoring it, while pushing their own lucrative drug Remdesivir which doesn’t work.

The story is actually a familiar one to Lyme/MSIDS patients.

Regarding COVID, a similar smear campaign occurred over hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in which a fraudulent study had to be retracted from a prestigious science journal. Currently, the FDA , DOJ, AMA, APhA, ASHP are trying to ban any treatments that help with COVID, but support mandated COVID injections, despite the record-breaking adverse reactions such as antibody dependent enhancement, microclotting, risk of prion and parkinson’s disease, and deaths. These injections are less than 1% effective when absolute risk is taken into account. Conflict-riddled ‘authorities’ are completely ignoring natural immunity, and have manipulated data to blame the pandemic on the unvaccinated when it is the “vaccinated” who are driving COVID to mutate and causing the explosion in ‘break-through cases‘ resulting in hospitalization and death, which have been vastly underreported.

  • The author points out that Fauci made the unusual move of announcing at a press conference from the White House in April, 2020 that the anti-viral Remdesivir for COVID diminishes time to recovery.  He doesn’t discuss mortality at all. 
  • NIAID (where Fauci works) actually paid for the NIH study he alludes to.  Being fully aware of the study he also knew that midway through it the primary end-point was changed from mortality to time to recovery. This was obviously done because researchers saw that remdesivir had no significant impact on mortality. Changing endpoints midway in a study should raise a lot of red-flags.
  • Meanwhile, using evidence based on much larger studies, the WHO did not recommend remdesivir as they stated that there is no evidence that it improves survival or any other metric in patients.
  • ‘Slight of hand’ statistical trickery such as:
    • changing study end points
    • using non-infection efficacy numbers
    • and omitting absolute risk are continually being used to mislead the public into believing the accepted narrative that HCQ and Ivermectin are ineffective and/or dangerous, but that the COVID-19 injections are safe and effective.
  • Remdesivir is manufactured by Gilead Sciences, a California-based company which has been accused of bioterrorism.
  • The video then explains how at least 7 members of the COVID-19 treatment panel have financial ties to Gilead Sciences.
  • The three co-chairs who select the other panel members do not disclose financial ties to Gilead, but two of the chairs both receive financial support from Gilead. The third co-chair was one of the authors of the NIAID funded remdesivir study.  His name is not listed as a study author, you have to dig for it by looking at the financial disclosure form of conflicts of interest.
  • These conflict-riddled panelists push the drug they make money from but know full well it has no effect on COVID-19 survival. This is professional negligence of the worst sort that has potentially resulted in millions of deaths globally.
  • They choose to suppress ivermectin with study after study proving its effectiveness on mortality, and push their own ineffective drug.
  • Similarly to how Sweden has acted as a placebo arm in this vast evil experiment by refusing to lock down and force masks, resulting in ZERO COVID deaths, the state of Uttar Pradesh, India, which has about 70% of the U.S. population, chose to authorize ivermectin for those testing positive, for their primary contacts and for health care workers. Ivermectin brought COVID deaths down to ZERO.
  • Ivermectin could have ended the pandemic LAST SUMMER.
  • The suppression and censorship of Ivermectin is a crime.
Spread the word.  Effective treatments are purposely being withheld from the public causing needless deaths.

Teaching Physical Therapists When and How to Suspect Lyme Disease

https://www.lymedisease.org/shea-physical-therapists-lyme/

Teaching physical therapists when and how to suspect Lyme disease

By Jennifer Shea, PT, ATC-R

I practiced physical therapy for many years prior to becoming ill with Lyme disease and babesiosis. My education included a course in clinical pathology and a unit on infectious disease.

Less than one page in my medical textbooks was devoted to Lyme disease. The text described an acute flu-like illness experienced by individuals following a tick bite.

Key diagnostic features included a bull’s eye rash, facial nerve palsy and a swollen knee. Treatment consisted of a short course of doxycycline. It all seemed pretty straight forward. It wasn’t until I contracted the disease myself that I began to understand its elusive nature.

Unrecognized Lyme disease?

Reflecting back on my career, I recall several patients whom I treated that likely had Lyme disease and/or co-infections. I failed to recognize it at the time.

One patient had been diagnosed with fibromyalgia. As I examined her, she couldn’t tolerate even the lightest touch due to skin sensitivity. She reported profound weakness, fatigue, muscle twitching, and wandering joint pain.

In an effort to improve her strength and endurance, I developed a treatment plan involving gentle aquatic exercise. The water would provide resistance she could tolerate, and the buoyancy could be used to our advantage. She appeared to do well at our first session but chose not to return. She explained that despite the gentleness of the intervention, she experienced overwhelming fatigue and malaise after any type of exercise.

Another patient came to the clinic with a diagnosis of neck pain. Patients can often associate the onset of symptoms with a precipitating event, but this patient’s pain came on gradually and without apparent cause. X-ray and MRI results were normal except for mild age-related changes. The location of her pain shifted randomly, moving from the upper to the lower neck region appearing on the right one day and the left another.

Typically, patients experience symptoms that improve or worsen in a predictable pattern associated with posture, repeated movements, or activities, but this patient’s symptoms fit no such pattern. She experienced numbness and tingling that migrated. During several treatment sessions, she complained of intense headaches and felt generally unwell due to a virus she recently caught that she “just couldn’t shake.” Whenever she appeared to improve in response to treatment, she would regress for reasons unknown.

Horowitz symptom questionnaire

I’ll never know if those patients had Lyme disease. At the time, I didn’t know enough about the disease to consider it as a possible underlying cause for their symptoms.

Today I am alert to its varied manifestations and have the benefit of using a tool called the Horowitz Multiple Systemic Infectious Diseases Syndrome Questionnaire to help sort things out.

The Horotwitz questionnaire has been shown to be a valid, efficient, and low-cost screening tool to assist practitioners in deciding if additional testing is needed to distinguish between Lyme disease and other illnesses. The results of a 2017 study showed that this questionnaire accurately differentiated those with Lyme disease from healthy individuals. It can be used by medical practitioners or laypersons.

According to the CDC, some 476,000 individuals in the United States are diagnosed and treated for Lyme disease annually. According to MyLymeData, most patients see more than four physicians prior to being diagnosed, and 36% do not receive a diagnosis before at least six years of illness.

It’s reasonable to assume that many individuals with Lyme disease who have not yet been diagnosed seek physical therapy services to address the manifestations of the infection. Given that early treatment is associated with better outcomes, raising awareness among health care professionals is imperative.

It’s also important to make people aware of the limitations of diagnostic testing and that they have a choice when seeking treatment. They can choose to be treated under the guidelines set forth by the Infectious Diseases Society of America or those established by the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society.

Early diagnosis is critical

To that end, I wrote an article that was recently published in Physical Therapy Journal to guide physical therapists in the recognition and referral of individuals with suspected Lyme disease. I hope that by educating physical therapists about the disease, many individuals will be diagnosed sooner than they might be otherwise.

Click here to read the article in Physical Therapy Journal.

Click here for the Horowitz Questionnaire: MSIDS-QUESTIONNAIRE-FINALR

Jennifer Shea, PT, ATC-R is a retired adjunct faculty member of Springfield College in Massachusetts.

References

Shea J. Physical therapist recognition and referral of individuals with suspected Lyme disease. Physical therapy. 2021;101(8). doi:10.1093/ptj/pzab128

Horowitz RI. Horowitz Lyme Questionnaire. CanGetBetter. Accessed February 12, 2021. https://cangetbetter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/MSIDS-QUESTIONNAIRE-FINALR.pdf

Citera M, Freeman PR, Horowitz RI. Empirical validation of the Horowitz multiple systemic infectious disease syndrome questionnaire for suspected Lyme disease. Int J  Gen Med. 2017;10:249-273. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S140224

_________________

**Comment**

While treatment wasn’t the focus of this article, please understand it would be very unwise to “choose” IDSA Lyme treatment, as you will be given an insufficient course of doxycycline. This abysmal, monotherapy has shown to fail in nearly every antibiotic study ever done for the simple reasons that Lyme is a persistent, stealthy pathogen, and it rarely comes alone. 

Far wiser, is to locate a Lyme literate doctor specifically trained in tick-borne illness who appreciates and understands the complexities of treating this monster. These doctors diagnose and treat clinically based upon symptoms, not an antiquated, faulty test that misses anywhere from 50-90% of cases.

If you are new to this game, please read the sordid back-story and why there is polarization within the medical community on nearly every aspect of the illness. 

WARNING: Regarding tick-borne illness, all you will get from mainstream medicine is heartache, abuse, and poverty.