In 2019 the flu shots contained graphene and hydrogels. Nanoparticles and emulsifiers such as polysorbate 80 were designed to target and damage brain tissue of young children. How do kids lose speech, eye contact, socialization, self control? There has to be something so serious being absorbed into their brain. (Go to top link for video)
Please also read “Vaccines and Autism,” which states:
Nearly every childhood illness is either caused, aggravated or triggered by the vaccination schedule: epilepsy, diabetes, cancer, allergy, ADHD. FACT.
Go here to listen to Dr. Peter McCullough explain that autism was 1 in 10,000 when he was a kid in 1960 when children got 3 shots compared to the autism rate of 1 in 36 children today in 2024 when children get 108 shots.Autism, clearly appears to be associated with the expanding childhood ‘vaccine’ schedule. There are 200 studies linking excessive vaccination with autism. He also states that these autistic children are more likely to have gender dysphoria.
Francis Collins ‘Countenanced the Destruction of the Careers of Scientists Who Disagreed With Him’
Collins – guilty of abusing his power as head of NIH.
After supporting the funding of ‘gain of function’ research for coronaviruses, Collins attempted to cover it up by denying a lab leak. But, Collins is far from alone. He sent an email in April, 2020 regarding an article citing sources that believed COVID as leaked from a lab to a multitude of doctors including Fauci inquiring if NIH could do something to help put down this very destructive conspiracy. ‘The Cabal’ then commenced to do just that and destroyed careers and lives in the process.
Conference hears that doctors who raise the alarm on malpractice have had their careers ruined, with NHS trusts allegedly wasting ’millions’ on legal fees.
Whistleblowing doctors have been targeted by hospital bosses after they have raised concerns about NHS malpractice, a conference has heard.
The Patient Safety Conference at the Royal Society of Medicine, held in London on Thursday, was told that hospital trust have wasted “millions of pounds” trying to “destroy” the careers of doctors who raised the alarm about poor care.
Jane Somerville, retired professor of cardiology, chaired Thursday’s conference and said it was a serious concern that the higher-ups in the NHS were able to remotely access both the home and work computers of doctors.
She said, “the access is secret, remote, covert and it has the ability to get into the computer, remember you’re using NHS England email, can change documents and evidence,“ which could “lead to miscarriage of justice and misreporting of facts.” (See link for article)
_______________
**Comment**
Houston, we have a problem.
This is frightening on many levels.
Whistleblowers should be protected. Actively persecuting them trains all others to be silent.
Raising bogus cases against whistleblowers further trains them into silence. Dr. Al-Sam states:
“You raise concerns, they are not investigated, they raise a bogus case against you, they appoint a retired HR person to humiliate you, you produce documents to prove them wrong, they change the terms of reference for another MHPS (Maintaining High Professional Standards) investigation, now it’s your behavior, not capability, you produce further documents to prove these wrong, they refer you to the GMC (General Medical Council), you take them to ET (employment tribunal), they appoint several lawyers and do not hesitate to waste millions of pounds to destroy you.”
Not actively investigating whistleblower accusations completely undermines public trust in the system, which is already at a record low.
NHS’s ability to secretly access both HOME and work computers remotely of doctors is diabolically wrong. If they can remotely access, they can also remotely change documents and evidence. They hold ALL the power.
In a frightening revelation, David Morens, longtime aide for former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, allegedly boasted in emails about his ability to evade public records requests and his intention to delete any potential ‘smoking guns.’ If you were wondering why there’s no justice. Now you know.
ArkeaBio, a Boston developer of a vaccine to reduce livestock methane emissions, raised $26.5 million in venture capital funding led by an investment fund founded by Bill Gates. (See link for article)
WEF Demands Limits on Car Ownership Among General Public
Frank Bergman
The unelected World Economic Forum (WEF) is calling on global governments to begin placing limits on private car ownership among the general public.
The globalist WEF is demanding that regular families with more than one car should be forced to give up one of their vehicles.
Despite the fact that a person can only drive one car at a time, the WEF insists that limiting the number of vehicles people can own will help to “save the planet” from “climate change.” (See link for article)
The WEF has a long-promoted plan to eliminate ALL private car ownership, while they travel in private jets.
Climate Scientist Suggests “Culling” the Human Population with a Deadly Pandemic to Solve the “Climate Crisis”
By Cullen LinebargerOne government climate scientist made the mistake of blurting out the real end-game of so many radical environmental activists in a bid to preserve the planet: Killing off the human population.Bill McGuire, a Professor of Geophysical & Climate Hazards at University College London (UCL), authored a tweet Sunday that lamented the fact carbon emissions were not falling nearly as fast as needed and suggested solving the “climate crisis” with a deadly pandemic to wipe out swaths of the human population.
“If I am brutally honest, the only realistic way I see emissions falling as fast as they need to, to avoid catastrophic #climate breakdown, is the culling of the human population by a pandemic with a very high fatality rate,” he wrote.
(See link for article)
After public outcry, McGuire deleted his post.
The COVID gene therapy injections do appear to be culling the population all on their own.
Please keep in mind bird flu has been responsible for only 463 deaths worldwide over the past 20 years. Similarly to the many faces of deception of case counting COVID antics, they do not mention if the deceased died from bird flu or with it.
CDC officials have urged Americans most vulnerable to mpox to get vaccinated before the virus potentially returns to the US. Dr Jono Mermin, director of the CDC’s National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention division, wrote on X Thursday: ‘Two doses of the #mpox vaccine is safe & protects from severe illness.’
News of the illness, which often infects gay and bisexual men, comes as the US and other countries around the world prepare to celebrate Pride month in June.
And so it appears that “mpox” is again jockeying for Disease X position this election year, and may soon be neck and neck with bird flu. Note that for many years, the disease now called “mpox” was called Monkeypox. The WHO changed the name in 2022 because, in the obscurantist reasoning of the strange people who work at the WHO, “the original name of the decades-old animal disease could be construed as discriminatory and racist.” (See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
Globalists are hell-bent on having another pandemic. It’s their greatest desire next to global control & global vaccination.
And to make this happen, the CDC just launched a dashboard to track Bird Flu. Gotta report those cases every minute of every day to frighten the bejesus out of people so they will volunteer for their lucrative magic bullet ‘vaccine,’ that will maim and kill off anyone left on planet earth. And yes, you are picking up my dripping sarcasm.
I’m so done with this. All of it.
The CDC tests wastewater which detects influenza A viruses but it does not determine the subtype. This means that similarly to testing for COVID which couldn’t distinguish between the regular flu and COVID, they will simply count everything as A(H5N1), even if it isn’t. Further, wastewater testing can not determine if it’s from a human or from an animal.
But, now thanks to CDC tricks, states with a lot of animals that might be asymptomatic carriers will suddenly appear as if human “cases” are exploding. Then, if it’s found in animals, they will be mercilessly culled with a government payout to the farmer, which is eerily similar to giving pediatricians kickbacks for pushing ‘vaccines.’
U.S. health officials only recently admitted to funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China — but for decades, the U.S. government has funded the same type of dangerous research on bird flu in the U.S.
And that research continues today.
Funding for this mad-scientist research comes from the usual players: BARDA, USDA, the Gates Foundation, CDC, and the WHO.
The agency has released “guidance” to the biotech industry about how to get foods from gene-edited (GE) plants onto your dinner plate, doubling down on bad policies that treat GE foods the same as any other type of food—even though they are anything but. Action Alert!
THE TOPLINE
A new FDA guidance doubles down on a decades-old policy that allows largely untested GE foods onto the market.
In this broken system, a GE tomato is treated much the same as a regular tomato; the process used to create the tomato is irrelevant to the FDA.
Given the development of GE technology and the influx of synbio products, we need to fight for additional scrutiny on these foods.
Does it matter to you how the food you eat and feed your family is produced? Most of us who care about our health or that of our loved ones, or know something about nutrition and molecular biology, would say “yes.” But, for the FDA, it doesn’t matter what’s happened to your food on its way to your dinner plate. That’s the thrust of the new guidance document released by the agency on foods from GE plants. All that matters to the FDA is the finished product. This means a GE tomato gets to be treated, in regulatory terms, exactly the same way as a regular tomato. No additional safety measures are necessary for GE fruits and vegetables because the process used to create them, says the FDA, is irrelevant. We have to push back against this short-sighted, unscientific, pro-industry stance taken by the federal government. Just think about the influx of synbio foods that are coming to market, thanks to the fact that the FDA has effectively said to industry that it’s ‘game on’ for GE foods, and you don’t need to worry about any additional safety hurdles or labeling.
The guidance spells out the FDA’s logic—or lack thereof—on this issue. In its view, the FDA sees no reason to revise its 1992 new plant variety (NPV) policy that was developed for GMO plants, decades before the arrival of genetic engineering techniques like CRISPR. It argues that plant breeders have tinkered with plant genetics to produce new plant varieties for a long time, and very rarely has a new plant variety been the source of food safety concerns. The agency seems very bullish indeed on gene-editing:
Because genome editing techniques allow for greater control over the site of a genetic modification, new plant varieties produced using genome editing can produce foods with characteristics similar to or even identical to foods from traditionally-bred plants; thus, food from these genome-edited varieties may have the same characteristics as foods from traditionally-bred plants that have been safely consumed in the past.
This is the crux of the issue. And doesn’t it seem to be exactly what GMO protagonists were trying to tell us over two decades ago? The problem is that emerging science is demonstrating how GE—or lab-grown, or GMO-yeast fermented—foods may look and feel like their real counterparts, but they are not, as we saw recently with fake meat and fake milk. The FDA’s stance is extremely dangerous as it entirely ignores the unpredictable effects of genome editing and it opens the floodgates to foods that we have not evolved to eat with unknown nutrition and toxicological profiles. Yet the agency downplays these risks:
Based on available scientific data and information related to the use of genome editing in plants, unintended changes potentially resulting from genome editing are likely to fall within the scope of unintended changes associated with all other plant breeding practices that have historically produced safe food.
The FDA seems to be arguing that gene-editing is no more or less risky than previous plant breeding practices—an argument which defies common sense. Consider, for example, a 2020 article in Nature finding that gene-editing in human embryos caused “chromosomal mayhem,” analyzing three studies that showed large DNA deletions and reshuffling.
The term to keep in mind here is “bioequivalence.” The FDA, as stated above, believes that gene editing and similar techniques can be used to produce foods that, in its limited view, are identical to traditionally-produced foods. This is a pipe dream, particularly in light of recent research into all that we don’tknow about even the simplest traditional foods.
Most of us are aware of the basic nutritional building blocks of food—proteins, fats, carbs, vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, etc. The USDA, for example, has data on hundreds of thousands of foods broken down into 188 different nutritional components. But we’re learning that this only represents a small fraction of the biochemicals present in our food. A group of experts created their own database that is far more comprehensive, including information on 70,000 nutritional compounds—400 times more than the USDA database.
By way of example, the USDA database lists about a dozen compounds in raw garlic, while these researchers list thousands of compounds found in garlic. If we use the USDA as the benchmark, then about 99 percent of the components of food are a mystery to us. And that’s with food we’ve been eating for generations!
And this is the main point. We disrespect the complexity of natural systems when we think that we can tinker with this or that gene, or ferment foods from GMO yeast, or grow cells in a big vat, and achieve what Nature did over eons. If we don’t have a very sophisticated understanding of the food we’re currently eating, we’ll understand far less about foods produced through gene editing and synthetic biology. To call these foods “bioequivalent” and ready for market without a deeper understanding of what they’re made of and what it means for human health to eat them is utter lunacy—and a recipe for disaster.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and the FDA, telling them that we need more testing of gene-edited foods that research is increasingly finding are not bioequivalent to traditional foods. Please send your message immediately.
Sick Because of Roundup? These Bills Could Make Suing Impossible.
Nick Tabor writes in The New Republic:
“High-profile lawsuits have accused pesticides of causing cancer and Parkinson’s. But three states are now considering bills that would prevent these lawsuits.
Six years ago, the multinational corporation Bayer made one of the worst purchases in American business history: It bought Monsanto, the maker of Roundup, for $63 billion. Monsanto was already being sued by a school groundskeeper in the Bay Area who said his exposure to the weedkiller had given him non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Two months after the merger, a jury awarded the groundskeeper $289 million. Since then, Bayer has been pummeled with lawsuits, and between settlements and jury verdicts, it has been required to pay out more than $14 billion to plaintiffs. Its stock has lost 70 percent of its value.
Desperate to reassure investors, the company has been fighting back with every means at its disposal. Its latest effort: lobbying state legislatures to shield it from future lawsuits and to annul at least some of the 50,000 claims that are currently active. (See link for article & to take action)
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 