When the Vaccine Schedule Changes, the Vaccinators Panic
By Susan Sweetin
NVIC’s Chief Marketing Officer
This week, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly did something extraordinary, something the co-founders and followers of NVIC have been championing for over four decades.
They thoughtfully changed the childhood vaccine schedule.
The schedule was changed to align more with streamlined vaccine schedules of other developed nations like Denmark. The changes were fundamental enough to trigger a near-instant legacy media pile-on characterized by political outrage and what can only be described as pharmaceutical industry-driven panic.
Within hours, headlines rolled out notifying the public of the change:
- “What to Know About the New Childhood Vaccine Schedule”
- “Health officials slash the number of vaccines recommended for all kids”
- “CDC changes childhood immunization schedule, removing universal recommendation for multiple shots”
- “CDC Slashes Universal Vaccine Recommendations”
And then came the tone shift – from reporting to orchestrated narrative.
It didn’t take long for PR agencies and media outlets representing old guard mandatory vaccinators to go on the attack. Opinion writers scolded the public for doubting the safety and urgent need to give children more than 72 doses of 17 vaccines. Senators questioned the legitimacy of HHS policymakers reducing the number of recommended vaccine doses by more than 50 percent . Cable news framed the schedule change as dangerously confusing for parents and doctors.
The message from the vaccinators is clear: nothing needs to change and you don’t need to think, you just need to trust us and do what we tell you to do.
That reaction tells you everything.
The Science Didn’t Collapse, It Changed Who Decides.
As Barbara Loe Fisher explained in her June 2023 commentary “It Is Time to Declare Our Independence from the Vaccinators,” (watch it here), from the very first vaccine for smallpox, the mass vaccination system has suffered from a structural conflict of interest through a tangled web of lucrative public-private business partnerships powered by chemical companies and governments. The same individuals who develop, sell, regulate, promote, monitor, administer and mandate vaccines also have dominated the U.S. vaccine advisory committees making national vaccine policy recommendations.
That model depends on uniform compliance. The moment vaccine recommendations shift away from the “one-size-fits-all” and “no exceptions” approach, the illusion of inevitability cracks with it and there is room for the informed consent principle, not authority and coercion, to prevail.
Universal Vaccine Mandates Are About Control, Not Health
Universal vaccine use recommendations are administratively convenient. They are politically powerful. They are profitable. They are not synonymous with personalized medicine.
When CDC officials adjust the vaccine schedule – even modestly – it implicitly acknowledges what parents have been saying for years: children are not biologically all alike, not interchangeable units, and the risks of vaccines are not evenly distributed.
That acknowledgment inherent in the recent childhood vaccine schedule change is what rattles the system. Because once medical decisions are personalized out of respect for the life of each individual, coercion becomes indefensible and informed consent must be allowed.
Watch Who Screams the Loudest Right Now
Notice who is most alarmed by the schedule change:
- media outlets that dismissed parental concerns for decades
- political figures who default to “trust the experts” rhetoric
- commentators framing truth and transparency as chaos
And notice what’s missing:
- calm explanations of why the vaccine schedule change was made
- acknowledgment that science evolves and nothing stays the same
- respect for freedom of thought and conscience as parents navigate medical decisions for their children
Instead, the public is being warned – not informed.
Independence Was Always the Threat
NVIC has consistently stated that true vaccine policy reform begins with restoring the foundational principle of informed consent to medical risk taking – the ethical standard articulated in the Nuremberg Code that applies to all medical interventions in experimental and clinical settings alike. See NVIC’s Guide to Reforming Vaccine Policy and Law here.
The orchestrated negative reaction to this childhood vaccine schedule change confirms that the real concern of mandatory vaccinators is not measles, pertussis, COVID, or other infectious diseases, it’s public awareness that the final decision about vaccination belongs to the individual, including parents of minor children, and not to a doctor or public health official.
A Final Thought
If vaccine schedules are as scientifically unassailable as we’re told, then transparency should strengthen public trust, not threaten it.
And if the medical and public health institutions respond to every vaccine policy change with outrage, blame, and media hype promoting false narratives, then the problem isn’t public confusion, it’s institutional insecurity.
|
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 