Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

ACTION: Sign the Open Letter To Remove the mRNA Platform

According to journalist Jon Fleetwood, the letter has surpassed 3,300 signatures. Let’s get that number up. Add your name today.

https://americansforhealthfreedom.org/letter-to-kennedy

Open letter · September 18, 2026

Open Letter Regarding the Removal of the mRNA Platform

Addressed to Secretary Kennedy and President Trump by Americans for Health Freedom and the listed signatories.

An open letter demanding that President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. remove mRNA vaccines from the market has surpassed 3,300 signatures, according to Dr. Mary Talley Bowden.

Today, Dr. Bowden confirmed to JonFleetwood.com that the letter had collected 3,397 signatures as of her latest count.

The signatories reportedly have a combined social media following of more than 66 million.

Published September 18 by Americans for Health Freedom, the letter challenges the Trump administration over its failure to deliver on a central demand of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement: removing mRNA products from the market.

Doctors, scientists, legislators, and other public officials have signed a letter calling for greater transparency, independent investigation, and accountability over unresolved questions surrounding COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy.

You can sign the letter here.

________________

**Comment**

Do not worry if you aren’t a doctor, researcher, or PhD – sign it anyway.

The dangerous mRNA platform concerns everyone and should include everyone’s input. Future generations depend upon our action. It should concern us greatly that within 72 hours of a Siberian lab worker dying without a plague diagnosis, vaccine stocks shot up 20%, proving a fear narrative and countermeasure economy are fully built and waiting to be set in motion at any time by an unresolved death, long before any evidence.

The CDC literally changed the definition of vaccine so that mRNA fit the category. Comparing old and new versions of what they posted on their website, here was the definition on the CDC website in 2020:

Vaccines contain the same germs that cause disease . . . But they have been killed or weakened to the point that they don’t make you sick.

The new version became much more general, to include mRNA. Here is the current definition on the CDC website:

A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.

Many points stated are inaccurate at best. For instance, many become ill after vaccination. In fact, many become ill with the actual disease they are vaccinating for.

We’ve since learned the dangerous and ineffective COVID gene therapy was developed by the military and was passed by the FDA by ignoring data and by bypassing passing the advisory panel. It has ZERO to do with health. The White House orchestrated a cover-up of heart damage caused by the injections and U.S. officials knew the safety system was flawed and ignored the FDA doctor who alerted them.

SUMMARY:

  • Using the genetic code of COVID, a mRNA strand is constructed to create a specific protein
  • Gene therapy doesn’t work for long, requiring multiple doses and perfect conditions in the body
  • Never before have human cells been hijacked to create something that is supposed to attack the body
  • Overnight this technology used on a minority with particular deficiencies, was used on everyone to combat a virus
  • This gene therapy acts as a Trojan Horse by moving into cells to create a portion of the virus known as the spike protein
  • This important article explains that this Trojan Horse does NOT actually contain mRNA which is short-lived, but rather modified RNA (“modRNA”) which is developed for longevity which will disrupt and block cell metabolism and be incorporated into the human genome
  • It is asinine to expect the mRNA platform to work like a traditional vaccine
  • It doesn’t work against variants which is called original antigenic sin
  • The ‘powers that be’ knew the shots wouldn’t give you lasting immunity and probably wouldn’t work on variants.
  • They had no idea of side effects as it has never been used to create an antigen.
  • Founded in 2010, Moderna never talked about vaccines – only therapeutics and they never made any money at all.
  • High-ranking officials in the FDA and CDC have financial conflicts of interests with Moderna and Pfizer.
  • It’s called a “platform” for drug delivery because new drugs are needed for variants, creating a endless market.
  • COVID was used to get the public used to mRNA due to the conflicts of interests they have with a myriad of other drugs that are now in the pipeline.
  • It’s a win-win for profits for Big Pharma as well as the Biosecurity state allowing for the ability to track people’s movements through “vaccination” cards.  It’s also a win for power-brokers like Gates, the Davos crowd, WEF, WHO, and corrupt politicians desiring a mechanism to gain greater biological control over the population, and to be able to give or take away rights on command, naturally leading to eugenics.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

ACTION: Comment to HHS on EMF Health Effects Until Oct. 21, 2026

https://read.sayerji.com/p/secretary-kennedy-asked-for-the-evidence?

Secretary Kennedy Asked for the Evidence on EMF. Here Are 1,009 Studies.

HHS has opened the first federal health inquiry into wireless radiation in a decade. Your opportunity to comment and make a difference is now.

Sayer Ji

Oct 09, 2026

Article Excerpts:

For more than fifteen years, GreenMedInfo has indexed the peer-reviewed literature on electromagnetic field exposure under a single heading: Electromagnetic Field Harms. As of this week, that page holds 1,009 research abstracts, tagged to 156 distinct health outcomes and 30 natural substances studied for protective effects. Every record links to its PubMed entry. Anyone can read it. Nobody in the federal government has ever been asked to.

Until now.

This article does three things. It explains, in plain language, what the index actually shows — including the parts that cut against the easy story. It explains why the timing matters, which comes down to a 1996 rulebook and a 2021 court decision that was never answered. And it shows you how to file a comment in five minutes, whether you are a parent with a story or a physician with a caseload.

The outcomes with the most studies behind them are not exotic. They are oxidative stress (167 abstracts), DNA damage (82), male infertility (44), lipid peroxidation (43), cognitive decline (38), cancers (34), low sperm quality (33), brain cancer (28), headache (20), sleep disorders (15) and fatigue (14). Further down the list: childhood leukemia, acoustic neuroma, salivary gland disease, hearing disorders, ALS, Alzheimer’s, autism spectrum disorders, birth defects, hypothyroidism, autoimmune disease. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Lyme/MSIDS patients need to take the deleterious health effects of EMF seriously as it compounds their symptoms and is a known ‘illness intensifier.’ I highly recommend this article as Ji corrects many details used by EMF supporters as well as shows you how to quickly file a comment on either your experience or evidence. Please take the time to do so. Deadline is October 21, 2026

For more:

Category:

Activism, EMF, research

153 Nations Just Voted For Permanent Emergency. The US ‘No’ Was About Something Else

UPDATE:

Researcher James Roguski told The Defender that Monday’s declaration is a “sideshow to the main event” — the potential adoption of pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) which includes sharing biological samples and genetic data in exchange for any resulting vaccines, treatments and diagnostics. High-income countries, including the U.S., have objected to sharing potentially valuable technology and intellectual property with lower-income nations.

Roguski said talks on PABS will continue next month — and that a potentially binding agreement may arise from these ongoing talks, which would be “of great consequence to us all, including the U.S.”

“If the PABS negotiations reach agreement and the Pandemic Agreement is approved by the World Health Assembly in May of 2027, then the next U.S. administration will be able to sign on the Agreement and/or rejoin the WHO,” Roguski said.

https://read.sayerji.com/p/153-nations-just-voted-for-the-permanent?

BREAKING: 153 Nations Just Voted for the Permanent Emergency. The US “No” Was About Something Else.

Sayer Ji

Oct. 13, 2026

The UN’s pandemic declaration commits governments to counter health “misinformation” and never mentions freedom of expression, privacy or informed consent. The United States objected to other things.

Disclosure: I am a named plaintiff in Finn et al. v. Global Engagement Center (dismissed with prejudice on 28 July 2026) and the founder of Restore the First, the coalition the plaintiffs convened.

Article Excerpts:

On 12 October 2026 the UN General Assembly adopted a pandemic declaration by 153 votes to 3, with 2 abstentions (UN News). Paragraph 57 commits governments to “take measures to counter and address” health “misinformation, disinformation,” and to foster “trust in public health systems and authorities.” It defines neither term and never mentions freedom of expression, privacy or informed consent. The one government I can confirm dissociating from that commitment on the record, Italy, voted yes. The United States, which called the vote, did not raise it.

The declaration is non-binding. By “permanent emergency” I mean the argument of my white paper: an emergency architecture with no exit conditions. The declaration does not declare one. The question is what it leaves out.

The vocabulary is not new either: the amended International Health Regulations (IHR) already list “risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation” among core capacities (conference text). Three things still make this the sentence to watch.

  • Wider than its method. “Take measures to counter and address” is the operative phrase. Nothing says the measures stop at education, and no paragraph says what they may not include.
  • No definitions, no referee. Italy, which voted yes, called “infodemic management, misinformation, disinformation, and stigmatization” “not the subject of an agreed definition.”
  • A medical choice as a target. “Countering vaccine hesitancy” sits inside the commitment. The declaration never mentions informed consent.

The declaration has no emergency thresholds, no sunset clause, no review by courts or legislatures, no list of rights that cannot be suspended and no informed-consent guarantee.

In spring 2022, nearly 140,000 of its advocates emailed and called their representatives in support of a bill to defund the WHO, and 46 lawmakers signed on within a month.

That withdrawal rests on an executive order, which a future president could reverse. Stand for Health Freedom is now asking Americans to back H.R. 3839, Rep. Tim Burchett’s bill to make the exit permanent in law, because “without a law, the U.S. could rejoin the WHO at any time without Congress’ approval.” [standforhealthfreedom]

Take action: Tell your representative to cosponsor H.R. 3839 →[standforhealthfreedom]

(See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

The ‘powers that be’ are working overtime to give the illusion the U.S. is outside the power of the WHO’s pandemic treaty when the devil’s in the fine print. Nothing’s changed and can revert right back to overarching tyranny anytime someone declares a ‘pandemic’ emergency.

The “no” vote is a position, not a reform.


Please remember this as you go here to listen to Nicolas Hulscher explain how this declaration pushes ‘fast-tracked vaccines’ within 100 days, and will combat ‘vaccine’ hesitancy. Scientific censorship remains on the menu as well as lockdowns, ‘vaccine’ mandates, and other sweeping worthless health measures like mask mandates.

The news is not good, friends.

Seems nothing was learned from COVID.

For more:

The Plan has been in the works for decades and is quietly being implemented globally.

Category:

Activism

HHS Opens NIH Clinic to Study & Treat the ‘Vaccine’ Injured While New Bill Aims to Strip ‘Vaccine’ Oversight

https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-strengthens-vaccine-injury-research-reporting-patient-care

HHS Launches Agency-Wide Actions to Strengthen Vaccine Injury Research, Reporting, and Patient Care

WASHINGTON, D.C.—OCTOBER 8, 2026— The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) this week launched a series of actions to strengthen how the federal government identifies, documents, investigates, and responds to health problems reported following vaccination, with a focus on improving patient care and generating better evidence about potential vaccine-related injuries.

To address health problems Americans report after vaccinations, HHS:

  • Opened a new National Institutes of Health (NIH) clinic dedicated to studying and caring for patients experiencing health problems following vaccination;
  • Proposed reimbursing physicians for reporting suspected vaccine-related injuries to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) through a new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) policy, bringing vaccine reporting in Medicare in line with typical Medicare reimbursement policies;
  • Will require electronic health records to capture vaccine-related adverse events so that information can follow patients across the health care system; and
  • Is modernizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) VAERS to make reporting simpler and improve the tools available to researchers and medical professionals investigating potential safety signals.

“We must listen to patients and families who report vaccine injuries—not dismiss or gaslight them,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “President Trump and I are building a health system that takes them seriously, follows the evidence, and uses what we learn to make vaccines safer. This is how we earn back trust in our public health institutions.”

NIH Opens Clinic for Patient Care and Research

On October 5, NIH opened a new clinic dedicated to studying and caring for patients experiencing health problems following vaccination. HHS and NIH leaders marked the opening with a ribbon-cutting ceremony at NIH’s Bethesda campus.

The clinic brings specialized patient care and scientific investigation together, allowing NIH clinicians and researchers to evaluate patients, study their experiences, investigate potential causes, and identify better approaches to care. By connecting patients directly with clinicians and researchers, NIH will expand access to evaluation and care while advancing scientific understanding of health problems reported following vaccination.

CMS Proposes Reimbursing Physicians for VAERS Reporting

For the first time, CMS has proposed reimbursing physicians for the time they spend submitting reports of suspected vaccine-related injuries to VAERS, bringing vaccine reporting in Medicare in line with typical Medicare reimbursement policies.

VAERS relies on reports from health care professionals, patients, caregivers, vaccine manufacturers, and others to help identify potential vaccine safety concerns. CMS proposes the reimbursement policy to reduce barriers to physician reporting and encourage health care professionals to document suspected adverse events following vaccination.

Electronic Health Records to Capture Vaccine-Related Adverse Events

Federal health information technology standards overseen by the HHS Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology will now require electronic health records to capture vaccine-related adverse events so that this information can follow patients across the health care system.

The requirement will give health care professionals a more complete picture of a patient’s medical history and reduce the need for patients to repeatedly recount the same information when receiving care from different providers.

CDC Modernizing VAERS

CDC is modernizing VAERS to make adverse-event reporting simpler, more accessible, and easier to use.

In August, CDC solicited bids for a new contract to overhaul the system. On September 28, CDC announced a new contract to make VAERS accessible on mobile devices and improve the tools available to researchers and medical professionals investigating potential safety signals. Earlier this year, CDC also added a VAERS QR code to Vaccine Information Statements provided to parents and patients for each vaccine administered.

Together, these Department-wide actions will connect patient care, physician reporting, medical records, clinical research, and federal safety monitoring. They will help HHS better identify and investigate potential vaccine injuries, improve care for patients, and use what it learns to strengthen vaccine safety.

________________

**Comment**

Not to be a ‘Debbie Downer,’ but I’m not expecting much from this. The fact the COVID kill shots are till being pushed tells me everything I need to know.

For more:

________________

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-pharma-power-grab-new

The ULTIMATE PHARMA POWER GRAB: New Bill Aims to Strip CDC Oversight and Automate Vaccine Approvals

Del Bigtree sounds the alarm on S.3323, warning that this legislation is an open play for COMPLETE PHARMACEUTICAL CONTROL over every vaccine decision made in America.

Oct. 12, 2026

In this crucial clip from The HighWire, Del Bigtree exposes S.3323, the Family Vaccine Protection Act, a dangerous legislative maneuver designed to hand total power over U.S. vaccine policy directly to pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Under the bill, the CDC director would be stripped of independent oversight, legally required to automatically adopt Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations unless the agency can clear an onerous burden of proof and publish its review.

Additionally, the legislation forces ACIP to fast-track newly licensed vaccines and new indications based strictly on the manufacturer’s timeline.

Bigtree warns that this is a calculated, aggressive play for absolute corporate dominance over our public health programs, and that the public must mobilize to push back immediately.

Source: The HighWire

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines

IMA Calls on Congress to End Regulatory Capture & National Citizens’ Coalition Calls on Scientific Publishers to Correct ‘Misinformation’ Errors

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/ima-after-the-bmj-investigation-congress?

IMA: After The BMJ Investigation, Congress Must Act

After The BMJ investigation, IMA calls on Congress to end regulatory capture with five reforms to fix the vaccine safety failures the probe exposed.

Independent Medical Alliance

Oct 01, 2026

After The BMJ investigation, Congress must act

Did industry capture help silence COVID shot safety warnings? The BMJ’s findings demand an answer from lawmakers.

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), a national coalition of independent physicians, researchers and clinicians, today called on Congress to end the regulatory capture that may have contributed to the COVID vaccine safety failures documented by The BMJ.

The BMJ found that CDC and FDA officials were warned that the data mining tool they relied on to scan vaccine injury reports was blind to signals from the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots. Officials kept the tool and told the FDA scientist who raised the problem to back off. Then they assured the public there were no safety signals.

Pfizer and Moderna had record years. Pfizer’s Comirnaty brought in roughly $37 billion to $38 billion in each of 2021 and 2022. Moderna went from $803 million in revenue in 2020 to more than $18 billion in 2021, almost entirely from Spikevax.

The CDC didn’t run its second promised analysis until 2022. When it did, the analysis flagged myocarditis and other events as safety signals week after week, even as the CDC director publicly described the results as showing nothing unexpected.

Throughout the rollout, the federal government acted as regulator, largest buyer, liability shield, and, with Moderna, development partner. Several senior officials who oversaw these products later took high-paying jobs in the pharmaceutical industry.

“Congress needs to connect the dots and find out exactly where the pressure to overlook this data came from,” said Dr. Joseph Varon, President and Chief Medical Officer of the Independent Medical Alliance. “Frontline doctors, me included, were speaking up about the injuries we were seeing from the COVID shot. They used flawed FDA and CDC data to shut us down.”

IMA is calling on Congress to enact five reforms.

1. Separate the functions. The FDA’s biologics center authorized the mRNA shots and also controlled the safety analysis that could have raised questions about them. The CDC promoted vaccine uptake while co-running VAERS. Post-market vaccine safety should sit in an office that does not answer to the people responsible for vaccination rates, and whose findings cannot be overruled because they might fuel “rhetoric.”

2. Slow the revolving door. Senior officials who personally handled authorization, labeling or safety-signal decisions for a class of products should be barred for a set number of years from taking a paycheck, consulting contract or board seat with any manufacturer of that class. The FDA should also publish an annual accounting of where its departing medical reviewers go.

3. Make safety analyses public from day one. Any emergency product that floods VAERS should automatically trigger at least two pre-specified data mining methods, including one designed to catch effects shared across a product class. Post weekly results to a public docket the same week they’re produced. If a method is known to be insensitive, every official statement that cites it should say so.

4. Protect the scientist who brings bad news. Ana Szarfman was a career FDA officer. She was told to hold off, and when she persisted, to stop. Congress should give federal safety scientists who flag defects in active surveillance systems statutory protection, including a private right of action if they are removed from the work for speaking up.

5. Put practicing physicians in the room. Safety rules that affect every household shouldn’t be written only by people who will never treat the 24-year-old with chest pain. Frontline doctors need a real seat at the table.

“We’re done accepting ‘trust us’ from agencies that kept a broken alarm running and then pointed to the silence,” Varon said. “If they want the public’s trust back, they can start by taking the fox out of the henhouse.”

The BMJ investigation is available at bmj.com. To arrange an interview with one of our doctors, contact Lynne@imahealth.org.

About Dr. Joseph Varon

Dr. Joseph Varon is a critical care physician, professor, and president and chief medical officer of the Independent Medical Alliance. He has authored over 1000 peer-reviewed publications and serves as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Independent Medicine. You can read more of Dr. Varon’s IMA posts here.

For more:

__________________

https://read.sayerji.com/p/correct-the-record-make-accountability?

Peer-Reviewed Misinformation: The Journals That Lent Science’s Authority to a Blacklist

How the “Disinformation Dozen” narrative moved into academic literature—and why major publishers must answer for the claims they published.

Sayer Ji

Oct 08, 2026

An open letter to Springer Nature, ACM, Sage, and The BMJ, exposing discrepancies between their published claims and editorial correction policies—with highlighted policy-versus-passage exhibits and a demand for stronger scientific accountability and the issuance of formal corrections.

Share the X thread for this open letter.

This investigation is part of a broader effort to establish accountability for the use of misinformation designations against identifiable Americans.

In September 2026, we launched Restore the First, a national citizens’ coalition bringing together 20 organizations and eight independent media outlets to address censorship, government accountability, and enforceable protections for First Amendment rights.

The coalition was convened by six Americans named in the original “Disinformation Dozen” report. Our work now extends beyond the conduct of government agencies and technology platforms to a question of scientific accountability: What happens when published research perpetuates inaccurate or unsupported allegations against the very people targeted for censorship?

We are calling on scientific publishers to examine the documented discrepancies, correct consequential errors, and strengthen their correction policies so that no individual is denied an impartial review because of their views or reputation.

The institutions that claim authority to identify misinformation must themselves be accountable for the accuracy of their claims.

The Organization Behind the Blacklist Now Faces Federal Scrutiny

In a striking development, Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate—the organization responsible for the original “Disinformation Dozen” campaign—is now the subject of U.S. government deportation proceedings. In September 2026, a federal district court dismissed his lawsuit challenging the government’s actions, and Ahmed appealed.

Although these immigration proceedings do not constitute a judicial finding that CCDH’s research was false, they place renewed scrutiny on an organization whose allegations helped shape media coverage, government pressure, and subsequent academic publications.

The question for scientific publishers is unavoidable: Did they independently scrutinize CCDH’s evidence before lending their institutional authority to allegations against identifiable Americans?

The credibility of a scientific claim must rest on its evidence—not on the influence or perceived authority of the organization promoting it. (See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

It was recently exposed by MedPage Today that ACIP decisions were “really made” behind closed doors, in violation of FAHA.

The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) requires that advisory committees serving the executive branch operate with strict public transparency, establishing that meetings must generally be open to public attendance and announced in advance via the Federal Register.

For more:

The worst purveyors of ‘misinformation’ for the past six years have been our public ‘health authorities,’ government, science publications, mainstream medicine, the White House, & media, Big Tech, globalists, Big Pharma, and ‘professional’ medical groups.

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses