Author Archive

The COVID Dossier

THE COVID DOSSIER

‘COVID was not a public health event’

A record of military and intelligence coordination of the global Covid event.

Please watch the interview with Debbie Lerman and Sasha Latypova.  (Approx. 30 Min)

Also, read the COVID Dossier pdf file in the top link which is a set of facts and references compiled by Lerman and Latypova.

All measures deployed were not public health measures They are ineffective, dangerous, and were simply intended to spread fear and panic so the public would embrace whatever countermeasure was introduced, which in this case was the experimental mRNA gene therapy never used in humans before.

Latypova gives an executive summary here going back five years.

Bulletpoints:

  1. Two declarations for CBRN (weapons of mass destruction) emergencies – EUA and PREP Act – made by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, were registered on this date. [ref][ref]
  2. A pharmaceutical executive was caught on tape saying that the U.S. Department of Defense called to inform him “that the newly discovered Sars-2 virus posed a national security threat.” [ref]
    1. On February 4, 2020, there were fewer than 12 confirmed cases in the US and zero deaths. Worldwide, the death count was less than 500, proving Covid was rooted in national security, not public health. No public health parameters justifying that a novel virus posed a “threat to national security” existed at the time of the EUA and PREP Act declarations. Within 6 weeks of this date, in order to ensure a market for the countermeasures, the lockdown-until-vaccine response – which is a military/counterterrorism plan and has nothing to do with public health [ref] – went into effect all over the world.
  3. Covid was a globally coordinated response, based on legal frameworks intended for biodefense/biowarfare situations. Nothing about the response – masking, distancing, lockdowns, ‘vaccines’ – was part of a public health plan.
Who ordered and directed these operations?
Who benefited from them?

Who was and still is covering them up?

The researchers have been investigating these questions for the last several years, and they hope many who read this will join them moving forward.

CALL TO ACTION

Most journalists in both corporate and alternative spaces are either unaware or unwilling to cover the military/intelligence/biodefense/global coordination aspects of Covid. We need to change that.

Please help us shift the conversation to focus on the true nature of the Covid response and the existential questions raised by it.

The top link also includes dossiers on Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Germany, and Italy as well.

For more:

Military/IC-affiliated groups involved in messaging/propaganda/censorship:

  • Ministry of Defense team [ref]
  • iSAGE [ref]
  • 77th Brigade [ref]
  • Nudge Unit [ref from March 11 2020] / Behavioral Insights Team – now “fully owned by Nesta” (National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts) [ref]
  • RAF analysts [ref]
  • Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL) (crossover US/UK)[ref]

Key figures in Covid response linked to military, IC, UN/WHO

  • Roy Anderson [ref]
  • Dominic Cummings [ref][ref]
  • Jeremy Farrar [ref] [ref][ref]
  • Clare Gardiner [ref]
  • Richard Hatchett (crossover US/UK) [ref][ref][ref][ref]
  • Tom Hurd [ref] [ref]
  • Thomas Waite [ref]
  • Simon Manley (UK Director-General Covid-19) [ref]

Who’s Trying to Stop America From Being Healthy Again?

Asking who is trying to stop us from being healthy should be important to everyone, but particularly to Lyme/MSIDS patients.  You don’t have to be in Lymeland for very long before realizing ‘things are not right.’

Lyme Monsters: Doctors who repeatedly attack sick patients, advocates, nonprofits, and Lyme literate doctors”.

It’s also important to ask due to the fact an alarming new study shows deaths of Americans aged 25-44 spiked to 70% above the expected rate in 2023.  They examined over 3.3 million deaths.

Predictably ignoring the elephant in the room, drug overdoses, suicides, alcohol, and the pandemic are blamed for the trend, despite the fact the causes of these deaths normally kill much older people, as well as the sudden contribution of cardiometabolic conditions.

Dr. Pierre Kory notes:

“the inexplicable and unprecedented rises in group term life insurance claims among young people 25-44, which occurred suddenly in the 3rd quarter of 2021 when mandates were all the rage.”

Dr. James Thorp is also sparking widespread concern that babies from COVID ‘vaccinated’ mothers are dying from placentas failing to grow and blood flowing incorrectly to the umbilical cord.

In the following article, A Midwestern Doctor gives the sordid history.  Please remember the many and varied Big Pharma tactics including the fact that Merck created a hit list to ‘destroy,’ ‘neutralize,’ or ‘discredit’ dissenting doctors.  This tactic is common everywhere in ‘public health‘ and the medical industrial complex and was routinely used during COVID.

________________

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whos-trying-to-stop-america-from?

Who’s Trying to Stop America From Being Healthy Again?

Untangling the century of dark industry tactics that have poisoned the health of America

Silencing Dissent

Since COVID-19 began, those who tried to warn the public about the clear dangers of how we were addressing COVID-19 (e.g., lockdowns, vaccines, and remdesivir) have been targeted and silenced. While many were initially in disbelief our government could do something like this, more cynical parties (e.g., myself) suspected something like this would happen (as it always does) and caught the early warning signs of it.

In my eyes, beyond the over-the-top marketing throughout the media to promote the COVID boondoggle, there were three particularly noteworthy (and interwoven) facets to this campaign:

  1. Widespread censorship of opposing ideas (e.g., GoFundMe deleting fundraisers for individuals who had severe COVID vaccine injuries and nowhere else to turn for help since those fundraisers alerted people to the vaccines not being completely “safe and effective” and most of the news networks refusing to question the COVID narrative). Of note, from the start, I assumed there had to be shadow banning occurring (as I could see the effects of it happen in real time) and coordination between the social media platforms and the Biden administration—an illegal activity which was gradually confirmed by lawsuits (e.g., due to the Twitter file) and other leaks that revealed shadow banning was widespread on the tech platforms.
  2. The establishment targeted anyone who dissented against the narrative in a coordinated fashion. For example, many absurd complaints were used to target the medical licenses of physicians who were saving patients from dying from COVID (e.g., Meryl Nass, whose suspension was so absurd that 13 members of Maine’s legislature formally complained to the medical board about it).
  3. A very aggressive and coordinated campaign to neutralize anyone who disputed the narrative on social media. Early on, I began to suspect this was happening because I’d see the same bad actors (typically doctors) use the same sculpted talking points. In April 2024, I found out an industry funded group did indeed exist, and that: •Many of the people I’d suspected were in a coordinated conspiracy did indeed belong to a secret group (“Shots Heard”) dedicated to fighting misinformation online.  •That group was tied to the Federal Government and funded by the pharmaceutical industry. •That group, one by one, would target dissident healthcare workers and attempt to both get them removed from social media, to have their medical licenses taken away or get them fired from work, and in some cases, to directly harass them at their homes.

(See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Once again, a very astute piece by AMD on important history that is imperative to understand.

A brief bullet-point of items discussed:

  • A chronology of the FDA’s war against America’s health and how many toxic food additives got ‘grandfathered’ into or food supply as ‘generally recognized as safe,’ as well as the cutthroat lobbying from the food industry and the resulting monopolization of food.
  • Due to powerful lobbyists defending industries that contribute to poor health, actions to address ‘the root causes of disease,’ are never taken.
  • The power of public relations and the common tactic they underhandedly deploy:
    • by paying a ‘trusted’ 3rd party ‘expert’ to promote their message
    • by creating an organization with a name that implies the opposite of what it actually does and then having the group promote policies that harm their stated cause to support the industry that in turn funds it all

N-of-1 Trials: The Only Hope for Lyme Patients & the Vaccine Injured

https://johncatanzaro.substack.com/p/n-of-1-trials-the-only-hope-for-long?

N-of-1 Trials: The Only Hope for Long COVID, Spike Protein Complications, and Vaccine-Injured Patients

Signal-Based Medicine | N-of-1 Trials

Feb 03, 2025

The Current Dilemma

The current medical system is failing those suffering from Long COVID and vaccine injuries—patients are gaslit, dismissed, and left to deteriorate without real solutions. The reason? Our healthcare model is built around randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were never designed for individualized treatment.

What Is an N-of-1 Trial?

An N-of-1 trial is a personalized, single-patient clinical study that aligns treatment based on the individual’s unique biomolecular response. Instead of relying on population-based statistics, this method uses real-time molecular surveillance, patient-specific peptide therapeutics, and adaptive treatment adjustments to achieve true precision medicine.

Unlike traditional one-size-fits-all drug development, N-of-1 trials are built around the patient—tracking their unique exome, transcriptome, and proteome to correct faulty molecular signaling at the source.

We do not have time to wait for mass-scale trials designed for bureaucratic approval pipelines rather than real-world recovery. Lives are deteriorating daily, careers are lost, and families are crumbling. The answer is clear: we need a personalized, adaptive medical model that responds to the patient in real-time—not a slow-moving, industry-driven system.

A Stark Illustration:

Recent breakthroughs in gene-based therapies have demonstrated impressive success in conditions like spinal muscular atrophy, sparking renewed hope for addressing complex neurogenetic diseases. However, many of these interventions are designed to target specific genetic variations, and the rigid structure of traditional clinical trials has created a severe bottleneck in innovation.

Economic and bureaucratic barriers ensure that commercial development is prioritized only for high-prevalence druggable genetic variants— those deemed profitable and feasible for large-scale trials. As a result, countless patients with rare or individualized molecular disruptions are left without viable treatment options, reinforcing the urgent need for N-of-1 trials that bypass these restrictive models and deliver precision-driven solutions in real-time.

Unfortunately, this progress has not extended to Long COVID and vaccine-related injuries, where patients are suffering from Spike-protein-induced immune dysregulation, severe cardiac damage, neuroinflammation, and persistent spike-related organ damage with no viable path to treatment.

The reason is clear: traditional clinical trial models prioritize druggable conditions with large, commercially profitable patient populations while existing N-of-1 trials are still shackled by the same flawed system, failing to deliver the personalized, compassionate care that patients with complex, individualized needs urgently require. The solution is simple: individualized N-of-1 trials must operate independently, untainted by the dysfunction of the current medical research model.

The Catastrophic Failure of RCTs in Chronic Disease

RCTs were designed for standardized drug testing, not complex, multi-systemic conditions like Long COVID and vaccine injuries. These illnesses vary drastically between individuals, yet the medical system continues to force them into rigid study parameters that discard individualized responses.

Why the System Is Broken:

• Deliberate Exclusion of the Suffering – Long COVID and vaccine-injured patients don’t fit neatly into RCT parameters, so they are ignored.

• Slow, Bureaucratic Approval Processes – Years-long trials mean patients deteriorate while waiting for an answer.

• Generalized Data Over Personalized Care – RCTs focus on “majority response,” discarding those who don’t fit the mold.

This isn’t science—it’s systemic neglect.

A System Rigged Against Individualized Care

We don’t see this approach in mainstream medicine because it threatens the financial strength of the pharmaceutical industry.

• Precision-targeted treatments mean fewer mass-produced drugs—which cuts into Big Pharma’s profit margins.

• A truly individualized medical system means fewer hospitalizations, fewer unnecessary interventions, and fewer chronic patients dependent on expensive lifelong medications.

• RCT-based gatekeeping ensures only patented, billion-dollar drugs get approval—while peptide and precision small molecule therapeutics remain buried under regulatory red tape.

This system is not designed to heal people—it is designed to sustain an industry. We Can’t Afford to Wait—Patients Are Deteriorating Now  (See link for article)

Further reading:

  1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01519-y
  2. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2829260?guestAccessKey=37236d8c-7c7d-4581-b9a3-a0bc7166de92&utm_source=silverchair&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=article_alert-jamaneurology&utm_content=olf&utm_term=012725&adv=004812881201
  3. https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.2425

__________________

**Comment**

I was struck with how this article directly pertains to many of the problems in Lymeland.  RCTs have been the bane of research for Lyme/MSIDS.  Because mainstream medicine denies this complex illness can be chronic with persistent pathogen infection, and the inclusion of numerous coinfections, RCTs only include those who test positive on a test that misses nearly 90% of cases, and have a rash that is highly variable.  Maternal-fetal transmission was identified in 1985, but it took 27 years to recognize and investigate. While ‘the powers that be’ acknowledge it can be transmitted congenitally, they still claim it’s rare.  Due to this stance, doctors continue to fail to acknowledge and treat it.

Everything’s rare, until it isn’t.

The sickest patients are not represented in the research.

Herbs For Bartonella & Babesia

https://iladef.org/herbs-for-bartonella-and-babesia/?

The International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS) is a nonprofit, international, multidisciplinary medical society dedicated to the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme and other complex inflammatory diseases. With these educational blog posts from experts and members of our board, ILADS aims to promote awareness and understanding of health and wellness, especially as it relates to complex inflammatory diseases, so that we can all learn and grow together. If you have any questions or want more information, you can email us at contact@ilads.org. 

Disclaimer: Every patient is an individual with unique characteristics. This blog article is not medical advice. It does not constitute a physician-patient relationship. It is for educational purposes only. Do not try out what is in this article without medical advice, working with your licensed physician and licensed healthcare providers

For people grappling with chronic Lyme disease, Bartonella and Babesia are increasingly in the spotlight. These stealthy microbes are often linked to some of the most debilitating symptoms, yet there’s a puzzling twist: they rarely cause severe acute illness in otherwise healthy individuals. This paradox may hold the key to understanding why traditional antibiotics often fall short—and why herbs, with their complex and synergistic properties, might offer a more promising path to lasting relief.

Babesia

Babesia is a protozoan. It shares characteristics with Plasmodium, the protozoa that cause malaria, but its potential to make people acutely ill is much lower. Instead of mosquitoes, it’s spread primarily by ticks. The most common species of Babesia are Babesia microtiBabesia divergins, and Babesia duncani, but about a dozen species have been associated with human illness.

Like Plasmodium, Babesia invades erythrocytes (red blood cells). Symptoms associated with an acute infection of Babesia, however, tend to be mild and may not appear at all: About 1 in 4 cases are asymptomatic. Symptomatic cases in immunocompetent (healthy) individuals generally resolve without treatment. Significant acute illness is mostly isolated to immunocompromised individuals and those lacking a spleen. Because most cases resolve without treatment, only about 2,000 cases are reported in the U.S. each year.

Bartonella

Bartonella is a slow-growing, gram-negative bacterium. The most common species include Bartonella quintana (trench fever) and Bartonella henselae (cat scratch fever), but a variety of Bartonella species infect humans; in fact, every mammalian species on earth (including whales!) harbors some species of Bartonella. Bartonella is spread primarily by insect and other arthropod vectors, including fleas, lice, and ticks.

Bartonella is a facultative intracellular bacterium, meaning it can live either inside or outside cells. It has a preference for invading endothelial cells lining small blood vessels. Like a tiger waiting for prey, this places the bacteria at an ideal location to invade and scavenge nutrients from erythrocytes.

As with Babesia, symptoms of acute infection with Bartonella are generally mild, and asymptomatic infections are not uncommon. Most infections in immunocompetent individuals resolve without treatment and go unreported.

A Balanced Relationship is a Natural State

Their main survival strategy is persistence, not aggression. (This is true of Borrelia and all the Lyme coinfections as well). Overwhelming a host with infection doesn’t work in the microbes’ favor. An equilibrium in which the host isn’t severely affected but the microbes can persist offers a stable environment for the microbes and — importantly — allows ongoing opportunities to spread to new hosts.

Of course, the host’s immune system would rather not have them there at all and makes every effort to root them out. The microbes, however, match that effort with sophisticated moves that allow them to persist. It’s a chess game that’s been going on between hosts and microbes for millions of years. In the end, a balanced host-microbe relationship is a natural outcome.

Mechanisms of Persistence

A key strategy used by all the Lyme microbes is invading and surviving inside cells. The internal environment of a living cell offers isolation from both the immune system and antibiotics. Different microbes invade different cells. Babesia and Bartonella have a preference for invading erythrocytes (red blood cells).

Another key strategy is the ability to slow their growth or even go dormant. Slowed growth or dormancy (quiescence) allows microbes to remain inside a cell without affecting the cell’s functions or alerting the immune system that the cell has been compromised.

Babesia parasites are cleared primarily by macrophages in the spleen (which is why not having a spleen is a big risk factor for severe acute illness). When red blood cells become swollen with parasites, the swollen red blood cells become trapped and then eliminated. By slowing their growth rate, red blood cells infected with parasites don’t swell, which allows infected red blood cells to pass through the spleen undetected.

Persistence of Babesia for greater than two years has been documented in asymptomatic individuals. Transmission of Babesia by blood transfusion is a leading risk to the blood supply in the United States, suggesting that individuals harboring Babesia asymptomatically are not uncommon.

The same strategy is used by Bartonella. It has been documented that the bacteria can achieve a slow enough growth rate to survive undetected for the lifespan of infected erythrocytes. In addition to lodging within erythrocytes, these bacteria may exist within lymphocytes and other cells in the body. Numerous studies have documented an asymptomatic carrier state for Bartonella in healthy individuals.

That isn’t to say that Babesia and Bartonella aren’t pathogens. They most certainly are. But they wait until they have the advantage. And they can wait — quietly residing inside cells — for a long time.

And it isn’t just Babesia and Bartonella. All the Lyme microbes use intracellular persistence as a strategy, though each microbe goes about it in a different way and has preference for different cell types. Together they form a silent reservoir of pathogens hiding out in blood and tissues — all waiting for an opportunity.

Reaching the Boiling Point

That opportunity comes if the host’s health is compromised. 

Sometimes it’s a sudden event — like a severe trauma or infection with a more virulent microbe, such as SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) — that tips the balance. But more often it’s multiple factors adding up over time: years of eating a poor diet, inadequate sleep, chronic exposure to toxic substances, or a sedentary lifestyle. All of those factors may weaken cells.

Once infected cells are weakened by stress, the microbes are free to grow unchecked. Unchecked microbes destroy cells. The types of symptoms that result correspond to the types of cells that are damaged.

Destruction of erythrocytes by Babesia results in symptoms including anemia, headache, muscle and joint aches, air hunger, an enlarged spleen and liver, brain fog, jaundice, bruising, petechiae, and dark urine.

Invasion of endothelial cells (cells that line blood vessels) by Bartonella bacteria can cause constriction of blood flow, which can result in symptoms including bone pain, pain in the soles of feet, endocarditis, and liver or spleen enlargement. Damage to red blood cells can result in anemia. Entry into the central nervous system can cause a range of neurological symptoms.

Babesia and Bartonella, of course, don’t account for all the symptoms that occur with chronic Lyme disease. Compromised host status allows the unchecked growth of not only Babesia and Bartonella but also Borrelia and any other pathogens that might be lurking in the host’s blood and tissues. Because different microbes invade and damage different cells in the body, a wide range of symptoms is possible.

It’s like a pot boiling over on the stove. Increased microbial activity compounds stress on the host, which unleashes greater microbe activity. It becomes a vicious cycle with cellular destruction caused by a frenzy of unleashed microbes throughout tissues.

Where Treatments Fall Short

Whereas, antibiotics might seem like the logical solution, antibiotics only kill active microbes, but have minimal impact on the total reservoir of slow-growing or dormant intracellular microbes in tissues. As soon as the antibiotics are discontinued, new microbes emerge and the patient relapses.

What’s more, antibiotics don’t restore the body’s ability to contain the microbes. In fact, prolonged use of antibiotics further compromise this ability by:

  • Disrupting normal flora in the gut and skin, which are a key part of the body’s natural defenses
  • Generating antibiotic-resistant pathogens, which has become a major health hazard worldwide
  • Being toxic to cells and mitochondria in the body

Winning the battle requires long-term suppression of microbe activity — without causing further stress to the body. In other words, you have to counter the microbes with the same strategy they use — with persistence instead of aggression.

The best suited option to achieve that goal is herbal therapy.

The Herbal Advantage

Herbs are plants. Like all living organisms, plants must maintain defenses against invasive microorganisms. They accomplish that task with a sophisticated defense system made up of hundreds of chemical substances known as phytochemicals.

It’s not a random collection of chemicals, however. The plant phytochemical defense system functions somewhat like an immune system. It’s selective for a wide range of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, and parasites — but doesn’t adversely affect normal flora.

This gives herbs a distinct advantage over synthetic antibiotics. The regular use of herbs actually balances the microbiome of the gut and skin, instead of disrupting it. Though well recognized, this phenomenon has been documented by science.

The advantages don’t stop there.

Antimicrobial resistance occurs most rapidly with the use of synthetic antibiotics. This creates antibiotic-resistant “superbugs.” In contrast, the same type of resistance doesn’t occur to herbs. In a world where antibiotic-resistant pathogens have become a major problem, herbs may be our best hope.

Instead of being toxic to cells (like antibiotics and many therapies), the phytochemical defense provided by herbs protects cells throughout the body from a wide range of stress factors by neutralizing free radicals, harmful radiation and toxic substances. This provides a high level of protection to cells.

Herbs are plants that humans have selectively consumed for hundreds or even thousands of years as both food and medicines. Not surprisingly, the most commonly used herbs have a very low potential for toxicity.

While all herbs provide broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, some herbs are more potent than others — and many of these herbs have found their way to treatment of chronic Lyme disease.

People have been using herbal therapy to treat chronic Lyme disease with good results for over two decades. Their stories and accounts, posted on the internet and social media, provide strong support for herbal therapy as a viable option for overcoming chronic Lyme disease.

The popularity of herbs for Lyme disease caught the attention of researchers at Johns Hopkins University. In a study published in 2020, a dozen herbs commonly used for treatment of chronic Lyme disease were evaluated for activity against Borrelia burgdorferi. Of the twelve, seven herbal extracts were found to have greater activity against both motile and cyst (dormant) forms of the bacteria than commonly used antibiotics.

The list included

  • Cryptolepis sanguinolenta
  • Juglans nigra (Black walnut)
  • Polygonum cuspidatum (Japanese knotweed)
  • Artemisia annua (Sweet wormwood)
  • Uncaria tomentosa (Cat’s claw)
  • Cistus incanus
  • Scutellaria baicalensis (Chinese skullcap)

In the same year, two other studies were published using some of these same herbs against Babesia and Bartonella.  In one study published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection MicrobiologyCryptolepis sanguinolentaArtemisia annuaScutellaria baicalensis, Alchornea cordifolia, and Polygonum cuspidatum were found to have good in vitro inhibitory activity against Babesia duncani in the hamster erythrocyte model.

In a second study done at Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory, Cryptolepis sanguinolentaJuglans nigra, and Polygonum cuspidatum were able to eradicate all stationary phase Bartonella henselae cells within 7 days.

The fact that several of the herbs — Polygonum cuspidatum (Japanese knotweed), Scutellaria baicalensis (Chinese skullcap), and Cryptolepis sanguinolenta — had good activity against more than one of the microbes shows the wide range of activity found in herbs. When herbs with strong broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties are combined with immunomodulating and adaptogenic herbs and medicinal mushrooms, the results can be phenomenal.

Rebuilding the Body Back Better

The low potential for toxicity associated with these herbs allows you to do something that isn’t possible or practical with most chronic Lyme therapies — never let up. Herbal therapy can be continued until all symptoms are resolved, even if that takes years. Instead of being in a perpetual war, however, you can think of it as rebuilding your body from the ground up.

Learn more about Dr. Rawls’ approach to treating chronic illness with herbal therapy on RawlsMD.

References

An X, Bao Q, Di S, et al. The interaction between the gut Microbiota and herbal medicines. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118:109252.

Akel T, Mobarakai N. Hematologic manifestations of babesiosis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16(1):6.

Bloch EM, Kumar S, Krause PJ. Persistence of Babesia microti Infection in Humans. Pathogens. 2019;8(3):102.

Bush JC, Robveille C, Maggi RG, Breitschwerdt EB. Neurobartonelloses: emerging from obscurity!. Parasit Vectors. 2024;17(1):416.

Cheslock MA, Embers ME. Human Bartonellosis: An Underappreciated Public Health Problem?. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019;4(2):69.

Deng H, Pang Q, Zhao B, Vayssier-Taussat M. Molecular Mechanisms of Bartonella and Mammalian Erythrocyte Interactions: A Review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:431.

Eicher SC, Dehio C. Bartonella entry mechanisms into mammalian host cells. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14(8):1166-1173.

Feng J et al. Evaluation of Natural and Botanical Medicines for Activity Against Growing and Non-growing Forms of B. burgdorferi. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Feb 21;7:6.

Goc A, Niedzwiecki A, Rath M. In vitro evaluation of antibacterial activity of phytochemicals and micronutrients against Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia garinii. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;119(6):1561-1572.

Goc A, Rath M. The anti-borreliae efficacy of phytochemicals and micronutrients: an update. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2016;3(3-4):75-82.

Jalovecka M, Sojka D, Ascencio M, Schnittger L. Babesia Life Cycle – When Phylogeny Meets Biology. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35(5):356-368.

Jin X, Gou Y, Xin Y, et al. Advancements in understanding the molecular and immune mechanisms of Bartonella pathogenicity. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1196700.

Ma X, Leone J, Schweig S, Zhang Y. Botanical Medicines with Activity against Stationary Phase Bartonella henselae. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Scherler A, Jacquier N, Greub G. Chlamydiales, Anaplasma and Bartonella: persistence and immune escape of intracellular bacteria. Microbes Infect. 2018;20(7-8):416-423.

Vannier EG, Diuk-Wasser MA, Ben Mamoun C, Krause PJ. Babesiosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29(2):357-370.

Xi Y, Li X, Liu L, et al. Sneaky tactics: Ingenious immune evasion mechanisms of BartonellaVirulence. 2024;15(1):2322961.

Zhang Y, Alvarez-Manzo H, Leone J, Schweig S, Zhang Y. Botanical Medicines Cryptolepis sanguinolenta, Artemisia annua, Scutellaria baicalensis, Polygonum cuspidatum, and Alchornea cordifolia Demonstrate Inhibitory Activity Against Babesia duncani. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:624745.

_______________

**Comment**

Please keep in mind this is one doctor’s opinion who just happens to make money off the very thing he promotes, so there’s a definite conflict of interest.

Also, since treating over a long period of time is often required, keep an open mind, and be willing to experiment.  It is common knowledge that people respond quite differently to treatment.  Wisdom and finesse is required for this journey.  Your best bet is to see an experienced Lyme literate doctor.

Personally, I can say I’ve used nearly everything out there – and some things definitely worked better than others, but again, what worked for me may not work for you.  Also, it’s important to understand dosages, pulsing, and cycling of treatments as these issues can make all the difference.

For more:

The ‘Silent Tsunami’: Is Your WiFi Contributing to the Rise of Superbugs?

https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/the-silent-tsunami-is-your-wifi-contributing?

The ‘Silent Tsunami’: Is Your WiFi Contributing to the Rise of Superbugs?

Olle Johansson: Bacteria exposed to mobile phones and WiFi radiation become resistant to antibiotics

What if the wireless tech that powers your everyday life—your phone, WiFi, and even baby monitors—was silently fueling the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria?

In this article Olle Johansson, Ph.D, delivers a chilling wake-up call: our love for convenience and progress might be helping bacteria outsmart the very antibiotics designed to save us.

The World Health Organization already calls antibiotic resistance the “silent tsunami”—a threat so severe it surpasses even the Covid-19 pandemic in its potential devastation. But Johansson takes it a step further, presenting evidence that electromagnetic radiation from devices like cell phones and WiFi may be accelerating bacterial resistance. Could our tech obsession be creating a perfect storm for superbugs to thrive? If left unchecked, this invisible threat could make once-minor infections untreatable and life-threatening. It’s time to hit pause on our wireless world—for the sake of life itself.


Stop! In the Name of Life!

Bacteria Exposed to Mobile Phones and WiFi Radiation Become Resistant to Antibiotics

Article Excerpts:

Occurrence of new, antibiotic-resistant, high-risk bacterial clones

A short time ago, in November 2024, I read that a multi-resistant strain of the Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria has taken hold in Europe. According to a new study, the occurrence of new, more resistant forms of a high-risk clone has increased sharply in recent years, including also in my own country, Sweden. Traditionally, E. coli bacteria are spread via water, food and contact with infected humans, the latter especially in hospitals where a lot of antibiotics are used.

By mapping the genetic mass of the E. coli bacteria, the European infection control
agency, The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), in collaboration with, among others, the Swedish Public Health Agency, has been able to show how the resistant bacteria that carry ESBL-CARBA (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase with Carbapenemase Activity, a substance found in some bacteria that makes them resistant to certain antibiotics) has spread within and between European countries. The study was recently published in the journal Eurosurveillance (Kohlenberg et al. 2024).

”The study gives further evidence of the serious increase in multi-resistant bacteria that risks reducing the possibility of treating severe bacterial infections in the future. Urgent measures are required to counter the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in Sweden and globally”, says Vilhelm Müller, investigator at the Swedish Public Health Agency.

Infections difficult to treat now will become very difficult, or even impossible, to treat in the near future … and that will also include ordinary, everyday ones!

Resistant bacteria a global health threat

The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies carbapenem-resistant bacteria as a global health threat and of the highest priority for research and development of new treatment methods. The ECDC study emphasizes the importance of continuing to develop and improve the conditions for reducing the spread of multi-resistant bacteria.

Antibiotic resistance, cell phone and WiFi radiations, and bacterial communication using microwaves

Surprisingly enough, nothing is – however – mentioned about the very recent results of several international research units like that of Taheri et al. (2017, see here), who have demonstrated that the exposure to 900 MHz GSM mobile phone radiation and 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from common Wi-Fi routers made Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli bacteria resistant to different antibiotics. These findings naturally have direct implications for the management of serious infectious diseases (cf. above), and may potentially lead to a future collapse of the global human population.

Another very important study is the US DARPA-funded one (Rao et al. 2022) which has found that bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, biofilms communicate using frequencies that are in the range used by Wi-Fi and 5G C-band. The experiment found that notable radiation is observed in the 3-4 GHz band coming from the Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Radiation from three identical biofilm samples was monitored and recorded over 70 days. Two distinct frequency bands, namely the 3.18 GHz and the 3.45 GHz bands, were identified as potential “communication bands”. Furthermore, long-term and short-term cycles of the total radiation intensity within the band were observed over the course of the experiment.

So this recent study indicates that bacterial cells in biofilms may use electromagnetic signals to communicate which are of the similar type as our own cell phone and WiFi signals! Biofilms are one of the most ubiquitous forms of biological systems on earth, and are commonly associated with infectious diseases. They are also responsible for contamination of medical devices and implants, deterioration of water quality, and microbial-induced corrosion.

This work confirms the presence of electromagnetic radiation within bacterial communities, which is a key requirement to demonstrate electromagnetic signalling among bacterial cells. The insight could lead to breakthroughs in demystifying how cells communicate as well as the advancement of important technologies in biology and communication systems. But, much more importantly, this is a very firm and strong warning to mankind to stop playing with biology here on Earth – we may have to very profoundly regret it.

Soil bacteria are also affected by radiation from mobile phone towers

It must also be noted that Sharma Antim Bala and coworkers (2018) have demonstrated the impact of the radiations transmitted by mobile tower base stations on microbial diversity in soil and antibiotic resistance patterns. Soil samples were taken from near four different base stations located in Dausa City, India, while control samples were taken far from any base stations.

A statistically significant greater antibiotic resistance was observed in microbes present in the soil near base stations compared to the control, using nalidixic acid and cefixime as antimicrobial agents (p<0.05). The authors stated that ”our findings suggest that mobile tower radiation can significantly alter the vital systems in microbes and turn them multidrug-resistant, which is the most important current threat to public health”.

The functional impairment electrohypersensitivity, food, bacteria, and artificial radiation

Finally, it should be noted that people with severe electrohypersensitivity have noticed a direct relationship between the severity of their functional impairment and sugar ingested (not white sugar, but sugary food), and as a result, heightened levels of electromagnetic field sensitivity. Such a direct relationship to their diet/internal bad gut load just from one day of cheating on a diet can result in a massively overwhelming and irritating increase of the electromagnetic field sensitivity during the next day.

So the impact on gut bacteria (E. coli; Candida albicans?) by diet perhaps may trigger attacks of electrohypersensitivity?

(See link for article)

_________________

For more: