Misdiagnosis of Lyme-caused rash can have potentially fatal consequences
Wendy Adams gave the following statement via telephone, during the July 8 meeting of the federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group.
I’m Wendy Adams of Bay Area Lyme Foundation, and I was a member of the inaugural Tick-Borne Disease Working Group, and most recently a member of the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology subcommittee.
Medical information and physician training on Lyme and other tick-borne disease is shockingly inadequate, and this inadequacy has caused fatalities.
Even simple undisputed facts, like the definition of an erythema migrans, are routinely misunderstood and miscommunicated by the physician and science community.
The terms “bull’s-eye” or “target rash” are often used synonymously with erythema migrans. But an EM is not required to have central clearing. An EM presents with central clearing in only about 20% of cases where a rash is present. That means that only one in six total Lyme cases will have a rash with a target appearance.
Mischaracterizing EM rashes
The mischaracterization of an EM as a bull’s-eye is seen in many places. Official NIAID reports on Lyme disease, FDA notifications, peer reviewed papers in major journals and presentations at scientific conferences by ID professors all have misstated an EM as a bull’s-eye.
Even a recently published textbook, edited by department chairs at Brigham and Women’s and Tufts Medical, states than an EM is a bull’s-eye rash.
Possibly more alarming, at least 12 state departments of health make this same mischaracterization on their public-facing Lyme disease webpages. Six of these 12 states—Ohio, Iowa, Illinois, North Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia—directly border a CDC-classified endemic state.
Almost a dozen cases of acute Lyme fatalities have been published recently. Most have a common theme – patients present multiple times to their PCP or ER with characteristic Lyme symptoms during an endemic season, that are dismissed as viral or idiopathic.
Even disseminated EMs are being mischaracterized, or worse, diagnosed as Lyme and then not treated.
These patients are then either found dead at home, or deteriorate and die in the hospital because they have not been treated in time.
Other TBI case fatalities from misdiagnosis are published as well. Diagnosing patients early is the best way to protect someone from life threatening infection.
When only one third of patients present with a known tick bite and the test is less accurate than a coin flip, all we have are providers’ diagnostic skills. They must be better educated about tick-borne diseases, because their inadequate training is causing fatalities that could and should have been avoided by timely antibiotic treatment.
Wendy Adams is Research Grant Director of Bay Area Lyme Foundation, and serves on its advisory board.
Yet we are told ad nauseum that Lyme doesn’t kill people and only requires a few weeks of antibiotics.
The lack of education about tick-borne illness is killing people, yet doctors smugly state chronic Lyme doesn’t even exist and they are clueless about the coinfections that commonly come with it: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/fake-diagnoses-not-fake-diseases/ These uneducated doctors typically write blogs such as these on sites that make sure ‘science’ is in the title, yet they refuse to listen to patients and look at the world-wide research themselves. Instead, they give ‘same old, same old’ IDSA rebuttals (a group made up of members with conflicts of interest who own patents on Lyme test kids and vaccines) about a disease that’s not slowing down for anyone.
Borrelia is one of the most complex bacteria(ish) organisms known to man that is pleomorphic and stealthy in that it is designed to survive. It doesn’t hang out in the blood stream long and loves immunopriviledged sites like the brain and spine. Then there’s the issue of coinfection – which is far more common than mainstream research and medicine will admit. What little work is done shows these coinfected patients are far sicker than if they were infected with one pathogen alone, yet the CDC/IDSA/NIH continue the dogma they’ve held for over 40 years.
The best quote I can give those who state they are relying upon ‘science’ is,
Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Along with that: Peer-Reviewed Evidence of Persistence of Lyme:MSIDS copy